Transcript
Automatically generated transcript. It may contain errors and includes testimony in languages other than English that is not individually marked up for assistive technology.
Marcelino Alvarez 1:59 - 2:01
Let's thank you.
Dana Dickman 2:03 - 2:07
Test, test, test, test.
We see captions.
Dan Ryan 2:07 - 2:07
That's better.
Sameer Kanal 2:07 - 2:08
Oh, I hear it.
Dan Ryan 2:08 - 2:10
That's better.
Sameer Kanal 6:49 - 7:01
Good morning.
We'll call this meeting of the Committee of the Whole of the Portland City Council to order at 9:33 a.m. on July 23rd, 2026.
Rebecca, will you please call the roll?
Rebecca Dobert 7:02 - 7:03
Koyama Lane?
Tiffany Koyama Lane 7:03 - 7:03
Here.
Rebecca Dobert 7:05 - 7:05
Morillo?
Angelita Morillo 7:05 - 7:06
Here.
Rebecca Dobert 7:06 - 7:07
Novick?
Steve Novick 7:07 - 7:07
Here.
Rebecca Dobert 7:08 - 7:09
Clark?
Green?
Mitch Green 7:10 - 7:11
Here.
Rebecca Dobert 7:12 - 7:12
Zimmerman?
Eric Zimmerman 7:12 - 7:12
Here.
Rebecca Dobert 7:13 - 7:17
Avalos?
Dunphy?
Jamie Dunphy 7:17 - 7:17
Here.
Rebecca Dobert 7:17 - 7:24
Smith?
Pirtle-Guiney?
Ryan?
Kanal?
Sameer Kanal 7:24 - 7:25
Here.
Dana Dickman 7:26 - 7:27
Hi, Avalos is here.
Rebecca Dobert 7:27 - 7:29
Apologies.
Noted.
Thank you.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 7:29 - 7:30
Avalos is present.
Sameer Kanal 7:31 - 7:41
Thanks.
I know we have a couple people who are just running a couple minutes behind today.
Uh, Christopher, will you please read the statement of conduct?
Welcome to the meeting of the Finance and Governance Committee of the Whole.
Dana Dickman 7:41 - 7:54
To testify before this committee in person or virtually, you must sign up in advance on the committee agenda at www.
Portland.gov/council/agenda/committee-whole, or by calling 311.
Information on engaging with the committee can be found at this link.
Sameer Kanal 7:55 - 8:00
Registration for virtual testimony closes 1 hour prior to the meeting.
In-person testifiers must sign up before the agenda item is heard.
Rebecca Dobert 8:01 - 8:33
If public testimony will be taken on an item, individuals may testify for 3 minutes unless the chair states otherwise.
Your microphone will be muted when your time is over.
The chair preserves order.
Disruptive conduct such as shouting, refusing to conclude your testimony when your time is up, or interrupting others' testimony or committee deliberations will not be allowed.
If you cause a disruption, a warning will be given.
Further disruption anyone who fails to leave once ejected is subject to arrest for trespass.
Additionally, the committee may take a short recess and reconvene virtually.
Your testimony should address the matter being considered.
When testifying, state your name for the record.
If you're a lobbyist, identify the organization you represent.
Sameer Kanal 8:33 - 12:09
Virtual testifiers should unmute themselves when the clerk calls your name.
Thank you.
Thank you.
We have 3 items on our agenda today.
We have reappointments of 2 members of the Prosper Portland Board of Commissioners.
We have Vision Zero updates.
We also have an ordinance proposing yes.
Approving consent to franchise transfer from Zenith Energy Terminal Holdings LLC to ISQ Springer Holdings LLC.
Um, we normally do the chair update.
I can do it in my remarks and just do it, but it won't be allowed to be put into the record.
There was a little mistake in filing, so in order to let me put the written document into the record, I'd ask for unanimous consent to let me add that as a formal agenda item.
Seeing—.
Okay, thank you very much.
Um, all right, so we have the Chair's update today.
I've updated all of the document.
This will be posted online shortly for the public.
Sorry for the delay on that.
It's just a slight update to the first table that you've seen, which is what's coming up on the agenda.
Trying to be as transparent as possible while noting, of course, that things do get moved around a little bit.
For example, we just got told there will be a proposed ordinance on pinball and pool revenue regulatory program changes.
And so trying to make sure there's space and time for that on the agenda.
The other thing I wanted to flag is on August 6th, Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
Today we're gonna hear a presentation on Vision Zero updates.
There were a lot of people who wanted to be able to testify on that, in particular in line with the last couple weeks and what's occurred in Portland with traffic deaths and injuries.
And we were unable to get that on the agenda for this week's meeting.
After the filing deadline, there's a process and it just wasn't able to happen.
So we'll be putting that public hearing on the agenda for our next meeting, which is in 2 weeks.
Testifying on that.
It is a little bit separated temporally from today's presentation.
We want to make sure that folks have the opportunity to talk to us about Vision Zero as well.
We're picking up our budget process discussion as well, and you can see a few different touchpoints along the way there between August 6th, September 3rd, and so on.
The other thing that's worth mentioning is that next week would've been a Committee of the Whole meeting.
That has been replaced by a full council work session on the Moda Center term sheet.
So we'll pick back up on August 6th as a Committee of the Whole.
Moving on to the second part, updated list there.
I'm gonna be asking councilors if there's anything that's not on this list, please let me know.
And if there's something that you put on here that I could use more detail on, in particular the potential oversight topics, please update me there so we can get that added or changed.
And then the other thing is I'm gonna be adding a section to this report with updated, sorry, with upcoming report backs from the administration.
So for example, we set a, we did a resolution last year on that adopted the investment policy for the city.
We also amended it to ask the administration to give us some information back on that by August 31st.
And just to have that all in one place where we're tracking it, I'm gonna add that to this list so you can see what's coming up.
Okay.
Probably not more than 20 of those at any given time is my guess, but between budget notes and legislation, they do exist.
So if there's anything you know of, please let me or the vice chairs know.
We can get that in here as well.
And that's kind of it for Section 3.
So I will pivot to Section 4 in a moment, but I do see 2 people in the queue.
So if you have questions for me, and then I'll pass it to Chair of the City Life Committee, Councilor Zimmerman, and then Novick.
Marcelino Alvarez 12:10 - 12:10
Thank you.
Mitch Green 12:10 - 12:19
Um, Chair, I noticed that it looks like foreclosed properties have been getting sent to the Housing and Permitting Committee for some reason.
Cornel Wesley 12:19 - 12:24
That historically was going to the Finance Committee.
This committee now is the Finance Committee, as best I can tell.
Mitch Green 12:25 - 12:30
And so, uh, while a foreclosure may— if you don't understand what a foreclosure is—.
Cornel Wesley 12:30 - 12:43
May seem like a housing issue, it is not.
It is a financial issue.
And so I'd encourage you to argue within the leadership team that those start coming back to the Finance Committee, which is in my estimation the best and most appropriate place for them.
Thanks.
Sameer Kanal 12:43 - 12:56
Thanks.
Yeah, I'm happy to bring that up and see where it's at and talk to the folks.
I believe Chair Avalos, her committee had it this last time, so we'll make sure that we're talking with her as well.
Councilor Novick and then Green.
Dan Ryan 12:57 - 12:57
Thank you, Mr.
Olivia Clark 12:57 - 12:58
Chair.
Sameer Kanal 12:59 - 13:27
So I was wondering, maybe this is a thing for City Life, but I think something we'd all be interested in under oversight.
I was wondering if we might have time at some point to do like a span of control session starting with the 50-odd people that supervise fewer than 4 people.
That would, I think, fall into the category of one of those budget-related things that we should talk about before we get into next year's budget.
Thanks, Councilor Novick.
Happy to add that to the list.
Councilor Green.
Mitch Green 13:28 - 13:54
Yeah, thank you, Chair Kanal.
I just jumped in the queue to lend some support to the idea of the foreclosures coming to this committee.
I think that we've made an effort to make sure that we have district representation on all of our committees.
But I think we— there was a lot of foreclosure actions that we were considering on Tuesday.
And we're getting into some interesting stuff there.
So it really is appropriate for this.
So just as another plus one.
Sameer Kanal 13:55 - 14:05
Thanks.
And for either Councilors Green or Zimmerman, there were commercial properties in that list.
There were a few, yeah.
Okay.
That to me also is a distinction that we should— Misunderstanding of what a foreclosure is.
Mitch Green 14:06 - 14:08
Okay, it's a finance issue.
Sameer Kanal 14:09 - 14:16
Thanks.
Seeing no one else in the queue, I, I'll, uh, pass it over to Chair Pirtle-Guiney for the, uh, committee report.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 14:16 - 20:02
Thank you so much, Chair Kanal, and thank you broadly for the opportunity for us to provide these reports and make sure that everybody's hearing about the, the work of the committees.
For today, this is the first update from the City Life Committee.
I want to start with a bit of a broad I'm going to start with a broader theory overview and then touch on some of the specifics that the committee is working on as well.
So as you all know, City Life Committee has a very broad portfolio, and I know that there was some concern amongst folks at the dais when committees were first formed that given the broad scope of the work, important issues within our purview might get lost.
Sharing that concern, I've tried to set up some of our early meetings to take a broad approach, because I do believe that the purpose of the committee is to think holistically and creatively about the everyday experience of Portlanders in our city, and that we can do that best with all of these topics together.
I'll take a moment of personal privilege and just say, when I ran for City Council, I first started thinking about this work because I was asking questions about the experience my kids would have growing up in Portland.
Will they have a safe, clean environment around them, access to good parks to play in with summer programs, real career prospects in a labor market where everyone who works in our city can afford to live in our city?
Will they be able to appreciate arts and culture scenes and even want to be here as they get older?
And these questions in many ways form the fundamental propositions that this committee is meant to grapple with.
So when I started as thank you.
So as chair, my team helped to create a visual to break down our work into 3 distinct buckets, and that visual is up on the screen just so that everybody has the opportunity to see it.
And this is how we are focusing our committee work.
What is the future of Portland's economy?
How are we building an economy again where people who work in Portland can afford to live here, creating the jobs of the future, good jobs that will actually second, how are we building community resilience?
And what does that mean for Portland?
How do we make sure that each of our distinct communities prepare for, withstand, and recover from disruptions, whether natural disasters, economic downturns, or social challenges?
And how are we building that fabric within our community?
And finally, what is that everyday experience of Portlanders?
Thank you, Councilor Smith.
People both who live here and who visit here.
2 separate and important things, but with lots of areas of overlap.
How do we make sure that this is a city with public spaces that people want to visit, a thriving arts scene, strong venues, sports teams that we rally around?
How do we make sure this is a place people want to live and a place that people want to visit?
So on the first day of committee, we had this very strategic meeting where we invited in more than a dozen of stakeholders, more than a dozen community stakeholders.
And partners to think through each of these topic areas.
And I'm happy to share more information there individually.
I don't want to take too much time on that today, but that was really meant to help committee members start to frame out what it is that we want to tackle in our work.
So this is a lot on the ideas end.
I want to get to some of the specifics, which is what I'll hope to report on regularly in these in the upcoming reports as we move through our rotations.
As you all know, because you see what comes out of committee and comes to this council, we have had a significant amount of our focus over the last few meetings on what I call the, the get it done items from the administration, those things that we just kind of technically have to get done to ensure the city keeps working.
But we've also made sure to prioritize time in every meeting for some large council items.
So the council president's arts tax legislation, work being done to protect TNC drivers, Council Zimmerman's EV charging station ordinance, and a robust conversation just last week about ESDs.
Looking ahead, there are a couple of large items coming up on our agendas.
One of those my team has shared information about with all of you.
We'll be having a discussion about city-owned performance venues, including both what the landscape is for our venues, how the P5 transfer, the Portland 5 venue operation transfer from Metro back to the city is going, and then looking at the future of our large performing arts venues and the work that's been happening with PSU and advocates for the Keller facility.
Around ensuring that we have a state-of-the-art large-scale performing arts venue in our city moving forward.
We also will be having a climate-focused session that we'll get information to— out to everybody on coming up in about a month and a half, where we'll look at the city's progress in meeting our climate goals and actionable strategies to move us closer to those goals, including work that is being done in our city there's certainly a lot more coming, and I am working with a few folks around some big conversations around economic development, workforce, and labor, among others.
And importantly, I would love to hear from all of you if there are topics you want to make sure we take on beyond individual legislation.
Legislative items that you're introducing.
I'd like to make sure we get those on the agenda now before things fill up too much.
And I will look forward to having another update in— what is it, 4 weeks?
Sameer Kanal 20:03 - 20:05
With the gap, it'll be a gap of 6 or 8 weeks.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 20:05 - 20:10
Yeah, perfect.
Well, thanks so much, Chair Kanal, for the opportunity to share a little bit about what we're doing.
Sameer Kanal 20:11 - 20:24
Thank you, Chair Pirtle-Guiney, and credit goes to Vice President Clark for the suggestion.
But also, thank you for raising the bar by having slides here.
I see Councilor Green in the queue.
Dan Ryan 20:25 - 20:25
So go for it.
Marcelino Alvarez 20:27 - 20:28
Yeah.
Mitch Green 20:28 - 21:45
Thank you, Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.
I also appreciate the slide.
I wanted to kind of link— thanks for mentioning the kind of visioning around the future of the large-scale performing arts venues and just sort of highlighting that flows through your committee.
I want to appreciate that your office sent an email a couple days ago saying, heads up, colleagues, councilors, this is going to be a big one, and mark your calendars.
Maybe you want to come testify and provide some of that.
You know, it is a resolution that will be considered, but in the broad context of the asset management work and the other things, I'm wondering if you've had any thoughts or—.
Yes.
Discussions around the potential to sort of link together a joint committee conversation.
Maybe it's moot because we have a Committee of the Whole at this point, but maybe sort of saying, okay, there is a sort of prioritization theme in that item that's going to be coming from the mayor's office to your committee, but there's also a big financial aspect to that.
And then do you think that's appropriate to kind of spin off as a side conversation?
I think that's appropriate.
Before it goes to the full council?
I'd be, I'd be very interested in that because I think that's something we really need to ground ourselves in.
I know that a lot of my constituents are really concerned about that.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 21:46 - 24:44
So I think there's 3 layers to this, and the first is that there has been an ongoing work group of folks from across our performing arts ecosystem around how we continue to have operation of a large performing arts space, right?
That 3,000-seat space.
And what, if any, gaps there are in our performing arts venues in the community.
And the resolution that's coming will absolutely have financial implications, but it is at its core a conversation about what do we do with the recommendations from that workgroup.
To ensure that we are, that we have the performing arts venues that we need.
So I think that's why that conversation is coming to City Life.
There will absolutely need to be a conversation about what the city's investment is in any changes.
This resolution is just saying, hey, the preview, it's posted, anybody can look it up, but the resolution solution is essentially to ensure that we are giving direction to the administration to have conversations with PSU if that's the direction that we decide to move in.
That's the recommendation from the workgroup.
And then also to give us a space to have a conversation about what do we want the next steps to be on Keller, because we need to make sure that that work is moving forward simultaneously.
So we are not committing any dollars in this resolution.
We are saying, yes, we want the conversations to move forward on these paths.
I think that's very much a City Life conversation.
There will be a next step where we will certainly be asked to commit dollars that comes out of those conversations.
And while I may ask that we first touch that in City Life so that we can have that policy overview, I do think that's I think that's very much a conversation that needs to come through this body as the finance body to talk about what we want to be on the hook for, what the trade-offs are between having state-of-the-art performing arts venues and the cost of that, and what other funding mechanisms there might be outside of city dollars.
So that's 2.
Separately, placing this within the conversations I know that you all are having in Councilor Clark's Committee about asset management, I think, is a really great idea because we do, I think, want to make sure that one piece of asset management doesn't get so far ahead of the others that we are prioritizing without having a conversation about prioritizing.
And I'd love to work with either or both of you about thinking around thinking about what that might look like.
Mitch Green 24:44 - 25:42
I I appreciate that.
And I think you've probably heard it in your own conversations with folks who are vested in this.
I know that we have in the old Arts and Economy Committee.
I know that there was some frustration from like the Downtown Neighborhood Association folks and folks close to the Keller for feeling that they didn't really get much of a place to speak to the public and with the public about this.
And so I expect what will happen next week is you'll get some of those folks to sign up for Aye.
Recognizing that there's a couple layers to what is going to be actually on the docket and that other financial considerations will have to happen.
So I'm committed to helping facilitate those conversations in whatever the appropriate committee space is.
I think that my— I think Councilor Clark, we've had conversations to this end that are sort of making sure that those folks have a space to talk with us.
So I don't see—.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 25:42 - 26:07
Councilor Green, not only will we have room for public testimony, but the presentation from the administration on the recommendations from the workgroup will be followed by panels both speaking to the PSU project and speaking to the future of Keller.
And we will have an invited panel I appreciate that.
Mitch Green 26:09 - 26:14
And I'm going to try to make time to come to your committee and also provide some comments.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 26:14 - 26:23
And we do for District 4 have Councilor Zimmerman on the committee.
So I'm expecting that he'll have some things to share on behalf of those groups as well.
Thank you.
Great.
Olivia Clark 26:23 - 26:24
Thanks.
Sameer Kanal 26:24 - 26:26
So I'll go to Councilor Clark next and then I'll close us out.
Olivia Clark 26:26 - 27:45
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
I appreciate that privilege.
Just to build off of what Councilor Smith said, what Councilor Green has said, that I think, um, I'm hoping that you're open to amendments on the resolution.
Uh, I think that some of us may be coming in with those, um, possibly not immediately, but, um, given, uh, having been a participant in the ex officio committee and working closely with, um, the Downtown Neighborhood Association, I think you can expect some of that.
There's a lot of, um, detail that's not in that resolution.
Just, I just skimmed it.
I haven't looked at it in depth, but it needs, uh, it needs work.
Um, you probably didn't expect to have this much conversation on this particular issue, um, but the dollar figure does really, um, bother me, uh, what we're going to be expected to do.
And I realize that we have to do this resolution in order for PSU to access the bond money— sound familiar, folks?— to access the bond money that the state has set up for them.
So I appreciate that.
But I, um, I do think that we need to put a finer point on what's in that resolution.
And just one other thing, thank you for the chart.
I see that you listed Parks and Recreation.
I think their parks also comes under Public Works.
We've been dealing with parks as well, so we can talk more about that offline later if there's any kind of complication.
Thank you, Mr.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 27:45 - 28:23
Chair.
If I remember correctly, parks kind of and parks as an asset of the city and part of the Public Works portfolio is years, and we'll have to continue navigating that.
And I am expecting we'll need to have a lot of discussion on the resolution and even outside of the resolution what our intent is for the administration to be pursuing around both of the venues and the venue itself.
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 28:23 - 28:59
Um, I'll close this out by just adding, um, on a different topic, I'd love to have a conversation, um, or for— have your committee have a conversation about, um, equity and about the future there of the office.
Um, I think now that there is a citywide equity officer, who I'm excited to, um, see in action, I think that's a great opportunity to have in place.
I think having the conversation about everything ranging from the KPIs that were in the budget, which I mentioned earlier, but also just kind of how do we integrate that work better where it's less forced into a place of being commentary after the fact and actually helping shape things.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 29:00 - 29:11
That's great.
And we had not done as much in that space because we didn't have a director.
And I appreciate the highlight that now that we we can bring that back in in a more meaningful way.
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 29:11 - 29:27
Thanks.
Seeing no one else in the queue, that'll close out the chair update.
Thanks everybody for letting me add that to the agenda, and I'll get the slide as well as the report added to the document with the clerk's office.
Rebecca, could you please call what is now item 2?
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 29:29 - 29:48
Thank you for pointing that out.
I just want to note that the agenda is in the process of being reordered.
So yeah, the remaining items will now be items 2, 3, and 4.
Item 2, reappoint Marcelino Alvarez and Eric Kress to the Prosper Portland Board of Commissioners for terms to expire September 5th, 2029.
Document number 2026-224.
Sameer Kanal 29:50 - 30:11
Thank you.
And colleagues, this is a report that's being proposed, uh, with the request to be forwarded on to the— referred on to the full City Council from Mayor Wilson.
We have with us, uh, Cornell Wesley, Executive Director of Prosper Portland.
Gustavo Cruz Jr., the board chair of Prosper Portland, and I believe one of our 2, uh, candidates for reappointment.
But I'll pass it to Director Wesley, or I guess whoever is going to start.
Cornel Wesley 30:20 - 31:59
Well, good morning, Chair Kanal, Vice Chairs Koyama Lane and Ryan, and members of the committee.
Once again, for the record, I am Cornel Wesley, Executive Director of Prosper Portland.
Glad to be joining you again.
Next slide.
I will provide some introductory remarks about our agency before turning it over to our board chair, Gustavo Cruz, and one of the mayor's appointees, Marcelino Alvarez, for their remarks.
We hope the majority of the time can then be sent and be spent in discussions with you all.
I'd also note that due to the reappointment deadline approachment approaching, we needed to get this on your schedule soon.
And unfortunately, that means we were not able to have Commissioner Kress in person with us due to previously scheduled travel.
He sends his apologies, and we hope that the conversations you had with him when you considered his reappointment in March are present and still relevant.
Next slide.
Prosper Portland is the city's economic and urban development agency.
Like hundreds of economic and urban development authorities around the country, we were established as a separate entity by voters to carry out certain work on behalf of the city government.
And we also implement city goals pursuant to Oregon state statute.
That being said, we work closely with the mayor and city council to deliver on the city priorities.
Our budget has been approved by council since 2007.
Council appoints our community leadership committees.
And every tax increment finance district and subsequent action plan is directly approved by council.
I would like to now turn it over to Chair Cruz for a brief overview of the board.
Gustavo Cruz 32:01 - 35:27
Good morning, everyone.
It's a pleasure to be here today.
Thank you very much for hearing us.
I really appreciate your time.
For the record, my name is Gustavo Cruz, and I currently serve as the chair of the Prosper Portland Board of Commissioners.
I've been a member of the board since 2015.
Prosper Portland is governed by a 5-member volunteer board who are appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the full city council.
These volunteers donate 3 years of their time each term, and some are reappointed to subsequent terms as determined by the mayor and as we're dealing with today.
Next slide, please.
DCA Donny Oliveira couldn't be here this morning, so it's my pleasure to introduce—.
To Excuse me.
To remind you all of the qualifications of Eric Kress, who was recently appointed to fill a 7-month board vacancy, and to introduce you to Marcelino Alvarez, one of the mayor's nominees for reappointment to the Prosper Portland board.
As Director Wesley stated, due to scheduling issues, Commissioner Kress is unable to join us in person, but I know that he appreciated his time with you and appreciated your perspectives and support.
In this critical time for our city, it's essential that we continue strong community-centered leadership on our board.
The mayor believes, as do I, that Commissioners Kress and Alvarez demonstrate the values, the real-life experiences, community leadership, and volunteer service experience to guide Prosper Portland through this pivotal period of our city's future.
As a reminder, Commissioner Kress is a real estate principal and civic leader.
He currently serves as president and founder of UDP Partners, Excuse me.
Urban Development Partners, UDP, and brings nearly 2 decades of executive leadership in the real estate sector.
Eric has built a reputation for managing complex urban mixed-use projects that drive economic activity.
He's organized 7 private equity funds deployed across projects in Oregon and Northern California.
He has led the acquisition and development and asset management of projects valued at over $500 million.
Including multiple LEED-certified developments.
As an added bonus, Eric began his career as an engineer.
His earlier work included roles in design and research for technology firms such as Cypress Semiconductor and Maple Optical Systems, as well as the National Science Foundation's Research Center for Computational Field Dynamics.
He holds 8 US patents and multiple publications in error-correcting code research.
Prosper Portland has already benefited from the extraordinary real estate and business development acumen that he brings to this volunteer role.
Now I'd like to spend a moment discussing Commissioner Alvarez.
It's been my pleasure to work alongside Commissioner Alvarez for the last 3 years.
During that time, his perspective and experience have been invaluable, especially through several key moments of agency transition.
Commissioner Alvarez is the CEO of Photon Marine, which is building the world's most powerful and intelligent electric outboard motor system tailored to commercial boat fleets.
Marcelino began his career in advertising, producing digital campaigns at firms like Wieden and Kennedy.
He later founded Uncorked Studios, a product design firm that helped companies like Nike, Intel, and Adidas bring innovative software and hardware products to the market.
Marcelino also serves as a mentor for PIE— that's the Portland Incubator Experiment— and as a member of the board of directors of the Freshwater Trust.
It's my pleasure now to turn it over to Commissioner Alvarez, who would also like to share a few words.
Marcelino Alvarez 35:29 - 39:43
Good morning, Chair Kanal, Vice Chairs Koyama Lane and Ryan, and members of the committee.
For the record, my name is Marcelino Alvarez.
Thank you, Chair Cruz and Director Wesley, for the warm introduction.
It's certainly been an eventful few years since my first appointment.
Our city has navigated a few transitions, certainly the director of Prosper Portland as well as this new form of government.
As an entrepreneur, I can say that I feel kinship towards each of you as I watch you iterate upon the design of our city, perhaps from version 1.0 to 2.0, to manage a limited set of resources and the trials and tribulations of that iterative process.
If no one has done so yet, allow me to be the first to welcome you to the startup community.
It's the world that we live in.
And we're now living through a moment that I believe is really going to define the next generation of Portland.
It has certainly been a tremendous honor to be a part of it for the last 3 years and to have played a small role in all of this.
Sitting here in front of you is an extreme privilege.
I'm grateful for all the work that you are each doing every single day to carry our city forward to its next chapter.
I thought it would be helpful to perhaps share a little bit more beyond the bio that Chair Cruz shared about me, and I'd like to preface it with a quote from the '90s band, the Toties.
I come from the water.
I was born in Dominican Republic.
I am the son of a Cuban and Puerto Rican father and mother, and I grew up in South Florida.
I spent most of my free time above, in, or around the water.
It has played a transformational role in my life.
It helped convene my community.
It served as a source of inspiration and recreation.
And now it is an absolute privilege to call it my professional focus as we try to decarbonize marine.
I came to Portland in 2006, so nearly 20 years ago, to work in advertising.
I had the fortune of working on the Nike account and really discovering how important the apparel and outdoor industry is to our region.
I left advertising to run a design studio where we placed human-centered design and led with empathy to build technology products that solved real-world problems.
It was then that our then-landlord Brad Malsin from Beam Development connected me to the Portland Development Commission, now Prosper, and encouraged us to get involved with them.
And at the time, that felt strange.
We were just a 6-person design studio, and I had no idea what I could offer our city.
But he pushed, as Brad does, and we got involved.
First, participating in neighborhood initiatives like Produce Row.
I got to judge the city's Startup PDX Challenge for a number of years, contributed to ecosystem development programs like TechTown PDX.
And even traveled as part of a delegation to Oakland on a best practices trip where I spent some time with then-Director Branham learning about Oakland and some of its trials and tribulations.
I had an opportunity to witness the agency's commitment to moving the city forward and building an economy that's both thriving neighborhood by neighborhood.
My vision for Portland is putting innovation to work in a way that solves problems through technology innovation and human-centered design.
With a focus on growing businesses.
And it'll surprise no one that I'm incredibly passionate about the efforts to reimagine our waterfront, which I think could be transformational for our region.
Efforts like the Albina Vision Trust, the OMSI redevelopment, the Willamette Falls Trust, and even MLB PDX have the potential to convene community, provide inspiration, recreation, and most importantly, drive economic development for decades to come.
As a father of 3 who's now married to a native Portlander whom I met in advertising.
I'm incredibly proud to call Portland home, and as I enter my 21st year here, it would be an honor and a privilege to continue to serve you as a commissioner to the Board of Props of Portland.
Thank you.
Cornel Wesley 39:46 - 39:50
Well, thank you again for your time and consideration.
That concludes our remarks.
Sameer Kanal 39:52 - 40:40
Thank you, Director Wesley.
Thank you, Chair Cruz.
Thank you to Marcelino as well.
Colleagues, we have testimony later, so we're going to start with all right, we'll start with any clarifying questions or any proposed amendments, and then we'll get into— or I guess floated amendments— and then we'll get into testimony and come back and do discussion.
Is there— sorry, is nobody in the queue right now?
I'm gonna pause however many seconds the council president normally tells me to pause, and then I have a question.
Okay, I'll go first just to make sure we get it out of the way here.
First, Director Wesley, you said when you were talking about Eric Kress, that the conversation— you hope that the conversations we had in March when we considered his reappointment are present and still relevant.
Yes, sir.
Missed something?
Were there— I don't remember there being—.
Cornel Wesley 40:40 - 40:44
No, his appointment, meaning when he originally came before you.
Correct.
Sameer Kanal 40:44 - 42:10
Okay, copy that.
Awesome.
So my question, I guess, is good in this case because it's only for Marcelino in this case, 'cause I'm asking about something that occurred last year.
You were in office, If I recall correctly, prior to June 5th of last year?
Yes, that's correct.
On that date, there was a settlement of a lawsuit that was approved by the City Council.
It was proposed to us.
It was from some of the people who were displaced in Albina during the proposed expansion of Legacy Emanuel.
It was proposed to us as $1 million from Prosper Portland and $1 million yes.
It was amended up to a total of $8.5 million.
At the time, we were told that because Prosper's board had not weighed in on it yet, we would need to approve it as $7.5 million from the City of Portland and the original $1 million from Prosper Portland, but that that conversation would continue through and that it might need to take until the next budget year, which is the one that Budget Prospectus is going to be approved.
Which is the one that finished last month, to get Prosper to pay its fair share.
That has not happened yet as far as I'm aware, and I'm wanting to hear why Prosper has not ponied up the full $4.25 million and when we can expect there to be a vote on the remaining $3.25 million from Prosper to make whole both the city and the people who were displaced.
Cornel Wesley 42:13 - 44:38
Councilor, we appreciate that question.
The displacement of Black Portlanders caused real generational harm.
Prosper Portland has acknowledged its role alongside other institutions as well.
However, EDPA II resolved the claims of the 26 individual plaintiffs in that lawsuit specifically.
It is also not the full scope of Prosper Portland's work on displacement.
Prosper Portland and this city have invested more than $135 million in North Northeast Portland over the past decade through affordable housing, homeownership, home repair, and community development, including $10 million in recently the Williams and Russell Redevelopment, supporting Black wealth building, are the first of its kind from a reparative project.
However, investments don't erase displacement's harms, which is why the agency continues strengthening community partnerships and reparative development work throughout the city.
But in respect to the claim, the bottom line is Prosper's committed share has always been $1 million, the same figure from the original deal.
It was never half of the $8.5 million through the city's insurance and claims fund.
An accurate recollection will say that on May 30th, $1 million from the city, $1 million from Prosper Portland, $2 million total, plus non-cash terms.
Then, to your credit, June 5th, an amendment was mentioned.
Introduced that raised that from $1 million to $7.5 million.
Prosper's $1 million obligation was never changed by that amendment.
The final approved amendment reads $7.5 million from the city and $1 million from Prosper Portland.
Now, if we're having a different discussion, or rather there's a desire for deeper involvement, I would point to our record and what we're also doing throughout the city.
But I think at this time, Prosper Portland has honored its commitment and it is still going well beyond that particular investment for those 27 plaintiffs.
Sameer Kanal 44:39 - 45:50
Thanks.
And Director Wesley, you weren't in the room when this conversation happened, so I want to respect that, that I don't hold you accountable for any of this because, yeah.
And I'll note that D.C. Oliveira is not here.
So if this is referred on, I will probably ask that he is available, and if the administration and the council president can coordinate so that it makes sense with his schedule, so that I can ask this question there, because that's the source of this conversation, this interpretation of what the next step would be.
Because I asked this question repeatedly on that date of whether or not— and I don't mind putting up to the $7.5 million for the city.
That's the dollar amount to us is not my concern.
My concern is who caused the harm putting up an equal share of the money.
Yes.
I'm taking that answer to mean that there is no current plan to discuss this.
My vote on this at the council will be dependent on this issue because I've raised it for well over a year now.
So when we, when we get to that point, I have a pretty significant concern about it.
Councilor Dunphy.
Jamie Dunphy 45:50 - 46:17
Yeah, thank you.
I had a couple questions for Mr. Alvarez.
So you've been on the Prosper board through a pretty rough patch of Portland's economy and through the transition of this new form of government, which was also rough.
What do you think success looks like in this new chapter, this new term that will be in there.
What can we expect from you and how you will influence the outcomes from Prosper's board?
Marcelino Alvarez 46:17 - 47:57
Yeah, absolutely.
Thank you for the question.
You know, as an entrepreneur, I bring sort of the perspective of a startup.
I bring the perspective of having run a small business from beginning to end.
And as I think about some of the challenges that we face, you know, I think it starts with livability, affordability, being able to build and grow here.
And I think, you know, through the last 3 years and certainly, you know, some of the time that preceded that, like, I think we've seen real challenges to our ability to grow businesses here in our region.
I think, you know, for me, success, maybe through the lens of the small business owner or entrepreneurs, I'd love to be able to see local homegrown talent take an idea from concept to formation and success and to be able to recruit and build employees both locally and regionally.
To come here and for those people to be able to afford to live here and get to work and feel safe along the way.
There are times where we see glimmers of that, where we see pieces of that.
And I think that, you know, sitting on the board of Prosper has afforded me the opportunity to see the very real effects that the Prosper team has put into action through, you know, some of the community leadership councils that are part of TIF districts to enable those efforts on a neighborhood-by-neighborhood basis.
I'd love for us to be a city that is not just a cool place on the West Coast, but that people come to because it's the best place on the West Coast and not the least worst of a bunch of other options.
And there are glimmers of that every day, and there's certainly challenges to that every day.
But I'd love to see it thrive in a way that, again, starts with small business that can grow and succeed.
Jamie Dunphy 48:04 - 48:21
Building off of that, you know, Portland is a small business town, right?
9 Out of 10 employers employ fewer than 10 employees.
But we're also facing a crisis in our downtown core.
And the reality is that 10-person small businesses are not going to fill up the office space that is downtown right now.
Sameer Kanal 48:21 - 48:23
Do you think it is Prosper's responsibility to try to attract more small businesses to downtown?
Jamie Dunphy 48:23 - 48:32
Absolutely.
To attract larger employers to come to Portland or to try to support existing or new smaller employers as a core of your mission?
Marcelino Alvarez 48:32 - 50:02
Yeah, I mean, you have to do both, right?
And I say this as someone who currently has fewer than 10 employees, and it's my goal to grow it to greater than 10 employees, but it's also my goal to get acquired by someone that's much bigger and that would keep us here and allow us to grow, right?
You have to be able to do both.
There are not enough small businesses to support the tax structure that we need to support all the social programs that we need.
We have been part of economic development trips where we have led groups to New York to work with ecosystem development partners to build out our capacity.
And I think part of it involves connecting the small businesses here that are on a high-growth trajectory with the financial resources and the customer resources that exist in other markets.
I build electric motors.
I don't have a customer in Oregon.
My customers are Washington and California.
And that is because of a lack of policy at a state level, right?
And so I still choose to be in Portland even if my customer base is elsewhere.
And I think that that's going to be true of some of the businesses that you're talking to here.
This is an incredible place to live, but you need to get to scale and you need a flywheel in order to achieve that.
So I think you need to be able to do both.
And it's certainly the role—.
Thank you.
Of an economic development agency to both balance out retention, because you don't want to, you know, have talent leave, while also creating sort of the acquisition and growth paths that are going to be part of a larger economic ecosystem.
So you absolutely have to do both, period.
Jamie Dunphy 50:03 - 50:57
Well, you know, one of my kind of worries is that we're with such cheap real estate suddenly developing in Portland because everybody's trying to get this lot I think Portland is equipped for a great next chapter.
But what I'm worried about is giant predatory corporations coming in and using their large capital positions to be able to push some of our smaller local businesses out.
I'm very worried about, I mean, monopoly power and influencing local folks here.
I've said repeatedly I'm still worried about Live Nation coming to Portland and forcing out our local independent music venues.
How do you see the responsibility of Prosper Portland as the economic development agency to balance that, to try and protect our local businesses in a very intentional way while recognizing that, as you said, we need to attract bigger employers anyway?
What should the role of Prosper be in protecting our locals?
Marcelino Alvarez 50:57 - 53:42
Yeah, I mean, I think of a number of the loans and programs that are run through the Office of Small Business.
I think of the efforts that Mitch Doherty has done for decades, even before joining Prosper Portland.
You know, those are grants and programs that are never going to go to a large outside organization, right?
And they help businesses with amounts from $10,000 to $200,000, which move the needle for those businesses.
Again, a large company is not ever going to come in and take that.
I also think just the role that Prosper had in connecting a number of businesses that are contemplating Portland to the right real estate developers and landlords.
And this is a region that has a number of people who put the portfolio of companies that reside in their buildings first over necessarily the unit economics of it.
And Prosper as a facilitator, as a convener, as a connector to those small businesses can help ensure that a small business or a startup is entering into a 1, 3, 5-year relationship with someone who's not going to turn them around, flip them out on the street when someone comes in and acquires that building.
And then the other part of it is just the ecosystem development programs like incubator programs that give those startups and small businesses opportunities to thrive and the resources that are part of that.
And again, these are resources that aren't available to larger corporations, nor are they going to be a part of it.
However, they could be housed within some of those larger corporations and within it.
And we benefited from— we helped co-create a program that Autodesk held in their headquarters here.
And then many years later, I resided in Autodesk's Portland offices for free, leveraged all those incentives that a large startup might have when we had no money, and were able to be part of a bigger ecosystem.
And again, I think that as we think about the types of corporations and businesses that we want to be the larger fish in our pond, I think that Prosper and others play sort of a role in cultivating the right types of businesses that are going to cultivate because they might ultimately acquire some of those companies, right?
And might help grow them and see them to the next chapter.
So I'd say we play a role at both ends of that, at the small end and then at the larger acquisition.
Make sure you've got the right people here in town.
And look, I'll be honest, I share those concerns too.
I share it from a— I'm in tech and I worry about tech.
And I say that not necessarily to sort of wave this, you know, sort of cudgel of fear of technology, but just making sure—.
Yeah.
We're entering into business with people who are asking the right questions about the technologies that we're building, how they're used, and what their impacts are, whether intentional or unintentional, on the communities that either get pushed out or displaced because of them.
Jamie Dunphy 53:42 - 54:00
Thank you.
My last question, which builds, I think, well off of that, is you have— we have all been deep in the conversation about the future of the Moda Center.
What do you think should be Prosper Portland's role in the redevelopment and the future of the Moda Center?
Marcelino Alvarez 54:00 - 55:49
Yeah, I'll answer this a couple of ways.
I mean, I think first and foremost, I'm a sports fan, right?
I came here to work for a sports brand.
I've seen the stories that Wyden Kennedy told, you know, on the pitch, on the basketball court, on the baseball field.
It would be a travesty if we were to lose our team.
And I say this as a person who grew up in South Florida as a Marlins fan.
I'm not sure if there's a lot of baseball fans here, but it has been a very painful existence my entire life.
We went through various owners from a garbage truck magnate that looked like a Tony Soprano knockoff to a hedge fund manager to an art dealer from Canada to Derek Jeter, who took our marquee player and traded him back to the Yankees.
I have been through a lot as a sports fan, and I would say that it is really easy to look at the conversations ahead of us and say this is between us and an owner.
And I think the 13-year-old in me would ask you to think of all the 13-year-olds in the city and think about the passion that they have for their sports teams.
The connective tissue that it is for their families, and how we find the balance to find an ability to keep that team here that doesn't necessarily put us in a place that is gonna leave a bad taste in everyone's mouth.
And I get that that's not an easy thing to do.
All of that being said, there's currently not an issue or an item for consideration of the board.
We are here to implement the mayor and council's decision on this.
Thank you very much.
Sameer Kanal 55:49 - 55:52
Thank you, Council President.
We'll go to Councilor Green, followed by Pirtle-Guiney.
Mitch Green 55:55 - 57:23
Uh, thank you so much, uh, Chair Cruz and Director Wesley and Mr. Alvarez for, uh, signing up again to, uh, continue to serve.
Um, I just have a couple questions and then we'll get into testimony.
I might have more later, but I just wanted to but make sure that I had the right information.
I'm going to follow up on what Council President had raised around the Moda Center piece.
I know that publicly it's been floated as potentially Prosper might contribute some money from the Strategic Investment Fund as part of this capital stack.
And, you know, the Strategic Investment Fund has been a topic of conversation at this body over the last year and a half.
I've been at the center of a lot of that.
But I think what I'm interested in from your position as a commissioner, as someone who cares about development and incubation in support of our kind of homegrown economic development projects, the SIF is there to provide opportunities for capital and then also get a return to Prosper.
And so every capital choice is a choice about opportunity costs.
And so how are you going to kind of move when that decision ultimately comes to the board to consider maybe using the SIF as part of the Moda Center capital stack in terms of articulating the tradeoffs?
What are we not going to do with the SIF that we would have otherwise done with the SIF, and how are we going to evaluate that?
I'm curious what your thoughts are at this moment, understanding that there's no item before you yet, but just broadly.
Marcelino Alvarez 57:24 - 59:36
Yeah, I understand the question and understand, again, there's no specific issue to respond to.
Yeah.
Just in a hypothetical, how am I gonna look through this decision?
Again, I'm gonna bring my expertise to bear as a former small business owner and a current entrepreneur, right?
I think for me, understanding like what are the impacts to, you know, starting first with the potential redevelopment project, like what are the impacts of the small businesses around the Moda Center?
What are the impacts to the employees?
What are the business-first decisions that are gonna affect our community?
There is a large organization, but there are ancillary businesses that are affected by any of the decisions that we need to undertake.
The second part of it is sort of related to community livability access, right?
How do the decisions that we make impact the ability for people to continue to enjoy these facilities and recreate?
And I say this as a father of 3 kids, it is really expensive to go to a Portland Pickles game.
Right?
Like, you know, and this is the neighborhood, you know, sort of ballgame, right?
So how do we ensure that the decisions that we are making are such that they're gonna provide equitable access to communities and people down the line?
And yes, every dollar spent is an opportunity cost against, you know, a dollar spent elsewhere.
But also, it is our job to look at, you know, Individual requests in the service of that specific request or among others that are alongside it.
And it would really depend, I guess, on the timing of it, what it is up against at a particular moment in time to understand like what are the trade-offs relative to a specific thing versus the hypothetical of, well, how might we spend this elsewhere 2, 3, 5, 7 years down the line?
So again, I think it would be—.
Yeah.
I think helpful, you know, as I think about ways that we can, we as Prosper can collaborate more closely with council, understanding, you know, maybe some of the, maybe kind of flipping that on its head, like what are some of the pulls and considerations that you would like us to, you know, contemplate as part of that, I think would be helpful inputs into our conversations and negotiations.
Mitch Green 59:36 - 1:00:34
I appreciate that.
And just to kind of follow that up just a little bit, during the budget process that Portland City Council just went through and also Prosper Portland, one of the innovations I was more excited about was a kind of a refresh around Advance Portland and some opportunities for the Strategic Investment Fund to seize the moment we're in to provide kind of an opportunity to acquire maybe some commercial and/or residential properties.
I think with the goal of providing both returns to Prosper but also kind of lower that burden, that hurdle rate for some of our commercial tenants in this town.
And so I guess as we get into this conversation more, I would ask you to keep in mind that that's a plan that is in place that I think has a lot of promise.
And if we're going to make decisions on the SIF that are not in line with that vision, I would be concerned.
And so I just would want a pretty transparent conversation around what we're going to give up on some of those opportunities.
Marcelino Alvarez 1:00:35 - 1:00:40
Sure, I'd welcome an opportunity to learn more.
And then certainly I wasn't absolutely part of all those conversations, so would defer to Director West and Lulu.
Mitch Green 1:00:40 - 1:01:49
Appreciate that.
Uh, the other piece I have is you, you mentioned something about waterfront activations and, uh, connectedness to the water.
That's something I care a lot about.
Um, I think there's a lot of folks in this room right now care about that for a lot of different reasons.
But, um, one of the issues that some of my thank you.
One of the issues that my constituents in District 4 have been grappling with in the South Portland Neighborhood Association in the kind of, you know, the area, the newly redeveloped area down by Zidell Yards and the like, is really wanting access and completion of a trail system.
And I know that that's conversations that folks like Roger, if you're listening, and others have been pushing on.
Partnership with Prosper Portland.
And I think those are small grants and those are small pieces and not part of the bigger picture, but I was piqued in interest that waterfront access and connectedness is a big part of kind of your own story.
So I wonder, as a commissioner, how you might communicate to this council and then my constituents some level of commitment in sort of not waiting another couple decades to finish a trail.
Marcelino Alvarez 1:01:49 - 1:02:56
Sure.
Again, I'm not able to make necessarily any commitments, but like I said, I'm pro-water, if that's a platform, and I would welcome an opportunity.
I mean, I think certainly as real estate decisions have come in front of PROSPER, I have always asked, is there an opportunity to connect this to the water?
And I know that Live Nation, as an example, was contentious, but one of the things that I asked in that testimony was, are there opportunities to connect the docks nearby on the Springwater Corridor such that someone might be able to get there by water, whether by kayak or personal boat or other form of modality?
I live, you know, the Springwater Corridor runs through my neighborhood and I'm very familiar with the trail of which you speak.
So as a personal Portlander, I also would love to see us, you know, move forward on waterfront developments and also not necessarily to have decades, you know, part of this.
I mean, I think, you know, some of the, Projects that you mentioned and I've mentioned, you know, have all been in the works for many decades.
And, you know, I'd love for it to not be my children's grandchildren that are the ones that get to enjoy it, but that we can see some of the benefits of these programs in our lifetime.
So—.
Gustavo Cruz 1:02:57 - 1:02:57
Thank you.
Mitch Green 1:02:57 - 1:03:21
And, you know, I'd be remiss if I didn't also talk about the other part of the north reach of the Willamette River and the future of connectedness between the communities who live in the area around the CEI Hub and being able to get access to the river there.
That is inherently linked with economic development.
So as a commissioner, I'm curious what you're thinking about over the next few decades.
What does redevelopment down there look like to you?
Marcelino Alvarez 1:03:22 - 1:03:23
Sorry, I missed which part of it.
Sorry.
Mitch Green 1:03:24 - 1:03:52
So the north reach of the Willamette River is everything kind of like downriver from our last kind of local bridge, and it speaks to the area that's part of the Northwest Industrial Area that's historically kind of closed off from folks who want to access the river in a more connected way.
And so cities change.
Oftentimes if you do a good job, your economic development gets cleaner and cleaner and cleaner and relies less on dirty, heavy industry.
And so do you have a vision for that?
Marcelino Alvarez 1:03:53 - 1:05:25
I mean, I would point to 2 things.
One is, not to be self-promoting, I gave a talk a couple years ago just about reimagining our city on the water.
And part of it was connecting to both the economic development that Kaiser did while building ships in our region and sort of how that transformed it to how we got rid of a proposed 6-lane highway that is now where Tom McCall Waterfront Park is.
So consider me an ally for how we reimagine that waterfront and access.
I, again, would love to see more access, more restaurants, more entry points into the water, just a friendlier ecosystem.
I'm out on the Willamette testing electric boats multiple times a week, and I can't tell you how many times it's a beautiful sunny day and the river's empty, and it breaks my heart.
And you go to other places and it's not that case.
I will also acknowledge having at least, no pun intended, tipped my toes in the water in some of these areas to understand what are some of the restrictions.
Clearly a lot of stakeholders involved at a state, federal level for some of these access points.
I know that at a state level, Department of State Lands obviously has purview into some of this.
Would certainly welcome conversations that could allow us to move things more quickly.
I look north to the other side of the Columbia River and see what Vancouver has done, and I constantly ask myself, well, why not here?
And would love to see more of that here.
So.
Thank you.
Let us know how we can help.
Mitch Green 1:05:26 - 1:05:26
Thank you so much.
Sameer Kanal 1:05:27 - 1:05:30
I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Councilor Pirtle-Guiney, then Novick, then Ryan.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 1:05:32 - 1:05:42
And Chair, my questions are more in line with some of these what are your thoughts questions.
Do you want me to wait until after testimony and do just technical questions now, or is this an appropriate time?
Sameer Kanal 1:05:42 - 1:05:50
I mean, if you think it's helpful to, um, the potential testifiers to hear here the topics you might raise, I think it makes sense okay.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 1:05:50 - 1:06:43
Why don't I ask just one question now then?
And that is, you know, I had 2 questions written down about kind of what is your vision, how do you approach your work?
And one was around the work of Prosper broadly that I think you answered well as you were in conversation with President Dunphy.
But I'm wondering if you can speak to your thoughts on the work of Prosper on the role of the PROSPER Board of Commissioners in coordination or not in coordination with the role of City Council as you are tasked with doing some very specific and important economic development work, and as we as an elected body representing Portlanders take on some economic development strategies ourselves, and how do we make sure that there is some coordination and collaboration there, or should there not be?
Marcelino Alvarez 1:06:44 - 1:08:16
100% Should be collaboration.
I mean, we are the implementers of the strategy that is set forth.
So whether that is Advance Portland, whatever comes beyond Advance Portland, it is our role to implement that.
I think the advantages that we have by, you know, well, I'll say this, being independent does not necessarily mean separate, right?
I would say that opportunities for conversation to understand like what are priorities for each of the councilors.
What are priorities for some of your constituents?
You know, it's just encouraging your constituents to attend our board meetings, right?
They are publicly held.
We listen to testimony from people.
So I would welcome more opportunities to connect, you know, on a month-by-month basis so that we can hear the voice of your constituents.
I think the second part of that is, you know, some of the scope of the projects that we are undertaking.
Sort of either exceed the term of office for any one of you or perhaps span multiple terms.
And so having some level of consistency across those where we can be carrying those and not necessarily be driven by, you know, an electoral cycle, I think is beneficial.
It only works if we're all talking.
So I think, you know, pragmatically speaking, I would just encourage more dialogue versus less.
More productive dialogue versus just talking in circles, right?
Like, how do we, how do we get to the heart of the matter?
What are the issues that are driving you and your constituents so that we can make the best use of that as we consider items that get brought to us?
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 1:08:17 - 1:08:19
Great, thank you.
I appreciate that.
Sameer Kanal 1:08:20 - 1:08:28
Thank you, Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.
Councilor Novick and then Ryan, and then we'll go to testimony.
I can hold my question till after testimony.
Thank you, Councilor Novick.
Councilor Ryan?
Dan Ryan 1:08:28 - 1:10:10
Yeah, thanks.
I think this is big picture and would thank you, Mr. Mayor.
Thank you, Mr. Mayor, for your help with the testimony.
It's good to see all of you.
Thank you, Prosper Portland leadership, for being here.
Mr. Wesley, Mr. Cruz.
First, I will be supporting both you, Mr. Alvarez.
Thanks for being here.
It's been wonderful to listen to you.
And also Mr. Kress' appointments.
But this is more for Prosper leadership.
I want to listen to you share thoughts on how we can learn from recent challenges that we've experienced.
Some before you were here.
I watched the developer walk— was it '21 or '22 on the Broadway corridor?
It was— what year was that?
Those years are all blended together, right?
When the developer walked from the Broadway corridor, is that '22?
'21?
Yeah, somewhere in that.
Okay, we're all saying it's one of those 2 years.
Okay, got it.
And that area is continues to sit shovel-ready.
That's the good part.
And we even have some of the infrastructure all set up.
And we all know earlier, a decade earlier, that wouldn't be the story.
There would have been major development already taking place there, and all the renderings we voted on when we were excited about it would have all come to fruition.
We also have the Centennial Mills that's experienced so many fits and starts over the years, and it kind of sits there waiting as well.
These are projects that Prosper's driving, and I just want to hear what we've learned, how City Council could be better partners with you, because this is kind of red alert time that we have such activity taking place that just sits there.
Give me some hope that there'll be some development occurring sooner than later.
And again, how can we be partners to see this through?
Cornel Wesley 1:10:11 - 1:11:57
Okay, so let's start with the partnership.
Um, question in that I want to tag on to what our commissioner has already stated.
This is an opportunity for us to work closer with council, which is my desire, which is why we tried to double down on transparency and communication and being more consistent and clear in what we're working on.
But I also want to call out the lessons we've learned around some of those deals.
Some of those deals are independent of Prosper.
Some of those things slow down because of economic conditions, and they're changing, right?
Real estate is where it is today because of economic conditions, and there are a lot of different reasons why we are in this space.
But from an organizational standpoint, how can we be more efficient in our— in financial stewardship and underwriting?
And so we've done a couple things internally to ensure the product and how we underwrite and review the product improves.
2 New recent hires that we've made here, is direct evidence in correlation to that.
We, we're doing some structural reform with development and investment, which is what it was historically known as.
Now it is capital access led by one particular executive and real estate and community development led by another executive, because what we found is having it embedded in one person diluted them both.
And so we have to do a better job in how we underwrite and, and how we review and what we invest in, but also calling out that Prosper is designed to make big swings.
We're not a bank.
We, we invest in projects that are at times speculative in nature, because if the bank wanted it, then Prosper wouldn't likely exist.
So there is a space that we play in that is unique, but we can also bring, uh, more robust tools to make sure that the end goal is still met, even if economic conditions change.
Dan Ryan 1:12:02 - 1:12:21
Did you want to add anything, Chair?
Um, no, that's—.
I think what I'm trying to get at is this is a decade earlier, this would have happened.
Yes.
And I know we can talk about the national conditions.
Yeah.
But let's focus on Portland conditions.
Yeah.
And what is— because some of these same projects in some other parts of the country would have been developed by now.
Gustavo Cruz 1:12:23 - 1:15:34
Well, I think I, I, I hear you and I agree with you to some degree, uh, but I think with respect to Broadway Corridor, um, we've seen a pretty dramatic change in capital availability since that project was begun.
Um, and I don't think there's any— you know, the, the number of folks that are willing to come to Portland and invest dollars from money centers, uh, is far different now than it was 10 years ago.
Um, and when we When we initially embarked on the post office project, if you will, it was a totally different environment.
And I feel like, and I think most people would agree who've watched the whole thing come along, that the city actually got a very good deal on that property.
And I still stand by that.
The post office, they needed to move out of downtown.
That was the economically rational thing for them to do.
I think the city And we were able to facilitate that.
We were able to buy a sizable piece of downtown real estate that was suddenly available for development and that would provide a lot of activity and economic development activity and other benefits, housing activity for our city.
So it was, you know, I think if you look back on it, we've had some bad timing with COVID and capital access.
And we had other problems with the site.
There are environmental issues with the site and a variety of things that have come along over the years.
But I think we will get back to it.
And we've got development online now.
There's things coming up with respect to affordable housing down there.
And I think gradually over time it'll come back.
I think, you know, I think all of us run a danger of looking at things in a very short short-term environment.
And that's actually one of the benefits of having commissioners on the Prosper board that are independent from regular election cycles, that we do see things in a long— from a longer view.
So for example, way back when, Dan, you know, I know you're a native Portlander, as am I.
We saw the transition in Portland from a resource-based economy to a totally different economy, you know.
We watched the spotted owl issue go by.
We saw the movement of timber companies out of Portland.
People said the sky was falling.
And to Commissioner— Councilmember Dunphy's point about cheap real estate and what that does in activity, well, what did that bring?
That brought activity amongst restaurateurs and other investors in downtown.
Which brought Portland along.
And 10, 15, 20 years later, we had tremendous activity by the '90s that we didn't have in the early '80s.
Right.
You know, so we have to take a long view.
And I would just say with respect to Broadway Quarter and with respect to Centennial Mills, Centennial Mills is another, a whole nother issue that we could talk about at some length.
But these projects take, do take a long time and are subject to a lot of external factors that unfortunately we don't really have a lot of control over.
Dan Ryan 1:15:35 - 1:17:01
Yeah, I appreciate that, and I definitely take the long view.
And we're partners in this work.
Yes.
And it is embarrassing sometimes that it's not moving the way it should.
And that's on us.
That's on you.
Like, how can we do that?
And I noticed it wasn't lost on me that our investment ranking nationally really tanked after the exit of the developer at that— at the Broadway corridor.
So these dots are all kind of connected.
Yeah.
So we have to be working together as a team.
And I hope when you're on the board that you all have these really serious board-like conversations about vision and culture restructuring and how to work in a maybe a more bold way with us so we can get some economic development going again.
Because all right, clearly I'm more comfortable with development than some of my colleagues, but it's because I like revenue.
I want our budget to actually have money in it again.
I want us to see the revenues coming back to our city.
And when business taxes are flat, when property values are going down, that's taking quite a hit on both the county and the city.
And that's why we're in our budget conundrum that we're in.
I agree.
So we have to figure out how to be more active with Prosper Portland, and we have to be more bold.
And I'm expecting the board to really have those serious conversations and keep us up to date on that action.
Keyword, action.
Thanks.
Marcelino Alvarez 1:17:01 - 1:17:01
Thank you.
Cornel Wesley 1:17:02 - 1:17:02
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 1:17:05 - 1:17:08
Thank you, Councilor Ryan.
Councilor Clark, is it for before or after?
Olivia Clark 1:17:08 - 1:17:22
Just a quick question.
Just to build off of Councilor Ryan.
I'm just I'm really excited about what is happening at Broadway Quarter.
I have been down to look at the infrastructure and walk around.
What's the thoughts on the train station?
Cornel Wesley 1:17:24 - 1:17:51
Well, we have recently signed a new lease, and so we are still obviously the landowner.
That one is far more complicated because, you know, this is federal and multilayered.
But it is an amazing asset for us.
I would love to debrief you in a different setting around what the possibilities are on that site and what are the current conditions and constraints.
Olivia Clark 1:17:53 - 1:17:54
Let's do that.
I appreciate that.
Dana Dickman 1:17:54 - 1:17:55
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 1:17:55 - 1:17:59
Thanks.
And just a quick question, would that normally be in City Life?
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 1:18:02 - 1:18:04
Which piece of it?
The conversation about the future of—.
Sameer Kanal 1:18:05 - 1:18:25
Sort of prosperous general activity.
But yeah, I guess the future of the train station.
Yes.
Okay, thanks.
I feel that way about our committee too.
All right, I think that we'll pick back up with Councilor Novick after testimony.
Rebecca, will you please call testimony?
Then we might have questions and discussion with you after as well.
Marcelino Alvarez 1:18:26 - 1:18:27
Thank you.
Dana Dickman 1:18:27 - 1:18:36
First, we have Jordan Lewis.
Emily H., Skylar Cruz, Victoria Burka.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 1:18:37 - 1:18:40
Jordan is online.
You can unmute and go ahead, Jordan.
Rebecca Dobert 1:18:45 - 1:18:46
Hello, can you hear me?
Dana Dickman 1:18:47 - 1:18:47
We can.
Sameer Kanal 1:18:49 - 1:21:05
Awesome.
Good morning, Committee of the Whole.
I'm Jordan Lewis.
I'm a volunteer lobbyist for the Portland Democratic Socialists of America.
I'm using this opportunity to speak on the topic of Vision Zero because there was no formal opportunity to testify on it at today's meeting.
This was distressing for a lot of community members who recognize just how cheap life is, human life is, when a car is involved.
We have exhaustive scientific evidence that driving speeds correlate with traffic injuries and deaths for all road users.
We know this.
Leaders choose to do nothing because they enjoy traveling at high speeds through urban environments and have decided that bodies in the hospital and in the morgue are worth their commute.
As a chemist, one of the most fundamental concepts we learn is the ideal gas law.
This law states that properties of a gas are proportional to each other.
If you take the same quantity of gas and put it into a larger container, the pressure must go down.
If you increase the temperature, the pressure must go up.
We see a similar phenomenon with traffic safety.
We have to slow down cars to save lives, period.
To save lives, we must depart from the throughput overall mentality of the 20th century.
We must slow cars down by putting things in the road: traffic lights, tighter curbs, bollards, and rocks.
We won't get there by taking out another traffic diverter or doing a stealth repave of Burnside with no transformational project elements, or by watching transit service get cut and say, not my jurisdiction.
I'm going to apologize here.
We have to slow down cars to save lives.
I apologize here for interrupting, Jordan.
Um, we do have rules of conduct that say testimony has to be on the matter at hand.
I apologize for that.
Uh, we are going to have testimony on Vision Zero after the presentation at our next meeting.
Uh, so I apologize for having to cut you off there, but we do have the rules of conduct.
And I'll ask any, any future testifiers who may have signed up for this item with the intent of doing that to, uh, refrain and please sign up as soon as we make that testimony available, which I do intend to do and, uh, did try to get it on for this, this week's agenda as well.
I just wasn't able to do it, and I apologize for that as well.
I look forward to the next shoe incubator.
Thanks.
Um, sorry, go for it, Rebecca.
I don't know who—.
Dana Dickman 1:21:05 - 1:21:12
Uh, Emily Hawley, Skyler Cruz, Victoria Berka.
Skyler, you can unmute and go ahead online.
Rebecca Dobert 1:21:16 - 1:24:28
Hello everyone, uh, my name is Skyler Cruz.
My pronouns are she/her.
I'm a resident of District 4 here in the Goose Hollow neighborhood.
I wanted to speak to Prosper about, you know, I think your work is incredibly important.
I think we do need to focus on economic development of Portland.
And I kind of want to talk about my experience of living on West Burnside for the past, what, I think 5 years at this point.
Um, you know, I moved into my building and I was very happy to see several businesses around me, even during COVID that could supply me with things like pizza and services.
And over time, I've just seen a lot of places close.
There's a lot of reasons for this.
You know, I'm not putting any blame on Prosper here, but I would like to just remind everybody that, like, part of the problem with a lot of the local businesses is how difficult it is to get around.
I live right on West Burnside, and I find it very uncomfortable to walk around this neighborhood for a variety of reasons.
So I hope that when we look at what is development, we're not just saying, let's give a bunch of money to a shoe manufacturer.
Let's look at the broader picture of how we make this place, the city of Portland, not just a place where people drive in and visit, but a place where people live, work, and play.
I have a car, but I try to avoid using it because I work in Vancouver, Washington, but I prefer to spend my time in Portland, Oregon.
I take a tax hit.
To be able to stay here in Portland because this is the city I love.
I think it's worth our time to invest in our neighborhoods and our communities.
I think since, you know, looking at how we pretty much kind of agreed that the Lloyd Center is not an economically viable option, we need to move away from sort of this infrastructure of driving people in and having the people who live here have affordable rent, be able to have that extra money to spend in the city.
I know a lot of people who live in the city of Portland who can't really afford to spend at their local businesses.
They end up DoorDashing because they're afraid of things like even tipping.
They don't want to have to deal with the commute time, the travel time.
Paying for parking becomes difficult, and I think parking is something people should pay for.
The problem is housing.
We don't have enough money to spend after we spend all of our money on rent.
So I hope that we can spend more time thinking about how the people who currently live in Portland can have the extra funds necessary to actually support local businesses.
Housing is our number one priority, in my opinion, and spending money on shoe manufacturing companies with bad business models is a waste of our time.
I think we should be really prioritizing low-income folks who would love to spend money here in Portland, who would love to provide the economic growth.
But end up ultimately just giving all their paycheck to their rent until they're unfortunately forced out of their homes and living on the streets.
And that causes other problems.
You know, if we don't address that problem first and foremost, everything else crumbles, and we can't do things like have police to take care of it.
It doesn't make any goddamn sense.
So thank you for your time.
I hope you do great work in the future.
Keep up the good work, and I hope to see good things from you in the future.
Thank you so much.
Eric Engstrom 1:24:28 - 1:24:28
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 1:24:29 - 1:24:29
Thank you.
Dana Dickman 1:24:31 - 1:24:48
Christopher Olson, Robin Bogusiewicz, Anthony Resh, JP Nash.
That concludes testimony.
Steve Novick 1:24:51 - 1:26:00
All right, thank you, colleagues.
We'll now move into discussion, uh, and eventually consideration of the report.
Uh, Councilor Novick, you're first in the queue.
Mr.
Alvarez, I just wanted to say that I really appreciated everything you had to say, with one exception.
To old baseball fans, thinking of Florida Marlins fans as long-suffering is a deeply offensive concept because this is a team that won 2 World Series in its first 11 years of existence.
I also, if time allowed, would love to ask you about the prospects for electrification in the marine industry because that's a really encouraging thank you.
Thank you, Councilor Novick.
I believe there was someone else who had mentioned they had other questions for after.
Is it okay?
Um, I have a question for Council President, which is, you know, I have questions that are going to affect my final vote that are unable to be answered based on, you know, DCA Olivera not being able to be here today.
Um, I, at the risk of not wanting to pull this off of the consent agenda at the full council, but also not wanting to hold this up here, I just wanted to know if you had preferences on how we handle that.
Jamie Dunphy 1:26:02 - 1:26:18
You know, the consent agenda is for when we have broad consent because we have done the work, we have heard testimony, we have debated the merits and don't need to debate it again.
We didn't get the full presentation today because there's questions to be asked, so I would have no I have no problem putting this on the regular agenda.
Sameer Kanal 1:26:18 - 1:26:40
Okay, I'll try to ask, uh, if, if the 2 members, uh, can come up, I'll try to ask enough questions to get to what I'm getting at here.
The first question is actually for the Chair Cruz, and the second question is for the prospective reappointee.
Um, but I'll let— while you're coming up, I'll let Councilor Koyama Lane go first if you're okay with that.
Do you mind questions first?
Tiffany Koyama Lane 1:26:40 - 1:27:23
Yeah, that's great.
Thank you, Chair.
We're aware, all aware of the challenges related to Prosper, specifically in Old Town.
That's played out really publicly in the press.
Although it is important to know what, what has happened and where things are at, it makes me also think about oversight and the role that Prosper plays in that.
And I'm just wondering if given the challenges, the failure of Made in Old Town, other related real estate and business investment in that area, what's Prosper's vision for where we go next and how does oversight play a role?
Cornel Wesley 1:27:25 - 1:28:43
So in reference to Made in Old Town, we're not going to hide the fact that the loan didn't perform the way we had hoped.
But I will also call out that Prosper Prosper's tools exist precisely to fund higher-risk, higher-impact projects that, again, conventional lenders won't touch.
And that means some will fail.
I think the relevant question isn't whether Prosper ever takes a loss.
It's whether the agency responds with discipline when one occurs.
And here's what happened.
This board acted immediately.
They did not provide any additional inducement.
There was no additional renegotiating of favorable terms and unanimous— unanimously voted to reclaim the collateral through a deed in lieu of foreclosure rather than absorb further losses that protected the public's position as a secured lender and not a grantor.
And so they exercised their accountability with the tools available to them.
Now, there is also a structural issue here that is worthy of calling out.
How did we get there?
Which is why I called out the structural reforms in my previous comments.
It was embedded in one particular department, which diluted both.
These 2 new leaders will prevent these style of deals from occurring in the future, and I have full faith in that.
Anything, Matt?
Gustavo Cruz 1:28:43 - 1:31:23
Yeah, I could just elaborate maybe.
Executive Director Wesley did a great job, I think, of explaining some of the details, but big picture-wise, I would just note that Prosper councilor Smith.
Our role is not to be a commercial bank.
That's the background that I come from.
I was a commercial lender.
I'm now a corporate lawyer.
I represent banks and financial institutions.
The deals that commercial banks do are completely different from what Prosper does.
Occasionally we will have a deal that a lender would look at, but oftentimes we're driven by community requirements and what do folks in the community want and what are people in industry doing and how are we activating a neighborhood that that needs activation.
There's sort of, there's subtle drivers of some of these projects that are difficult to work into an ROI calculation.
And this was one of them.
Made in Old Town was backed by the Old Town Chinatown community.
It was heavily pushed by the sneaker and apparel industry.
There was a lot of industry momentum behind this.
And I will say that a lot of the deliberation that goes on at PROSPER, a bit of it happens behind the scenes just as it does at City Council.
We have to be careful about quorum requirements.
But we do talk about things and we do go back and forth with staff quite a bit.
On our deals, and this was one that actually consumed quite a bit of time.
And there were other things that I think the board would've preferred to have in the Maiden Old Town deal that we didn't actually get.
But at the end of the day, there were enough public policy reasons and investment reasons and activation reasons, if you will, that encouraged us to make the loan.
It was not— it was obviously not something that one of my clients would have done.
So in any event, we, as Executive Director Wesley mentioned, I think we've dealt with it well from a workout standpoint, and I think we move on to the next project.
So, and I think there's good news in the sense that we have the building back.
You know, Prosper knows that building well.
We used to be in that building.
So we know that it's of good quality and that there will eventually be uses for that that will provide a good return.
So I hope that helps.
Tiffany Koyama Lane 1:31:23 - 1:31:55
Thank you for speaking to that.
And as a longtime public school teacher, I know there's always room for growth and reiterating and learning lessons.
And I know when I, you know, I'm knocking doors, I'm talking to constituents, the public really wants to feel like they can trust that funds are going to be managed well and there is oversight.
So thank you for speaking to this.
Are you able to share some high-level lessons learned or things that will be different going forward based on that experience?
Cornel Wesley 1:31:55 - 1:32:40
Absolutely.
What I can tell you is when I first got here, that was one of the things that dropped right in my lap as the new executive director.
And so immediately I audited every programmatic lane within the Prosper.
Every grant, every loan, every policy and procedure has been audited.
I've commissioned 2 independent studies to reimagine how we chart our new policies and procedures and guardrails and underwriting guidelines forward, moving forward.
So we have gone through robust structural change and it will be reflected Thank you.
Tiffany Koyama Lane 1:32:41 - 1:33:49
And appreciate, as you're sharing about the need to activate certain neighborhoods that need activation, and when I think about that, I think about who's included in that conversation.
I hear with this specific project that the Old Town Chinatown community was supporting this, but what I know about that area and some of that well, I know that a lot of people actually don't know that all of that area of Old Town was called Nihonmachi at one point, was Japantown before World War II.
And I know that there are communities, community organizations down there like the Japanese American Museum of Oregon that is really important, the China Portland Chinatown Museum and Lan Su Gardens.
And I know that there's been question if those folks are at the table and are also considered part of that community and heard.
And I'm wondering if you can speak to how it's decided which groups are brought in, because it's really important to think about which groups are representing historic and present-day communities when we're trying to activate those neighborhoods.
Cornel Wesley 1:33:50 - 1:34:21
Well, our cultural institutions are extremely important to us.
They are economic drivers for our city.
They drive tourism.
People come in town just to see Lan Su.
And so our door is always open.
We— I have been extremely loud about my view, my personal view, and my economic experience with cultural institutions as tourism drivers.
In real time, we're working with Lan Su right now on a project hopefully that will reinvigorate Old Town if it comes to fruition, and Prosper Portland stands ready to play its role.
Tiffany Koyama Lane 1:34:23 - 1:34:33
That's so great to hear.
And I would love to personally invite you to come to the Japanese American Museum of Oregon with me if you'd like to.
I would love that.
Okay, sounds great.
We will set that up.
Thanks so much.
Gustavo Cruz 1:34:35 - 1:35:58
If I could also add, you know, Prosper has been heavily involved in promoting those projects over the years.
So we're on that side of it too.
We've also been involved in lots of other economic I'm thinking off the top of my head, the Hoxton Hotel project.
Prosper was involved when that was originally spearheaded by the Naito family and then was later sold to the Hoxton Group, which is actually based in London.
And so we've had— there've been a lot of iterations over many years with those projects.
And unfortunately, as I was describing with respect to Broadway Quarter, it takes a long time, but we're very sensitive to that.
You know, looking back over many years, you can see how the makeup of businesses down there has changed dramatically.
Yeah.
I'd like to see some of those businesses come back.
The fact that there basically aren't any Chinese restaurants left anymore, you know, there aren't any small shops left anymore.
It's, to me, that's a tragedy, and I'd like to see more of that come back.
And there's a lot of communication and connection between Prosper and the Old Town neighborhood— excuse me, Old Town Chinatown Neighborhood Association.
And there's been turnover in that group lately.
I won't elaborate, but we're working on it.
So thank you for hearing me out.
Sameer Kanal 1:35:59 - 1:36:18
Thank you.
This opened up a lot of questions for me, but I'm going to— I think I'm hearing that we need to have a broader conversation about Prosper, so I'm just going to ask the ones so the first question for Chair Cruz, how are agendas set?
Do board members all play a part in that?
Does that come from the director?
Does it come from you?
Gustavo Cruz 1:36:21 - 1:37:05
The director, well, staff and the director typically put together a first draft of the agenda.
They circulate it.
There's usually a kind of a pre-briefing call or meeting between me and the staff who've developed the agenda to kind of run through it and talk about things that we might include or not include.
Sometimes specific commissioners might have some issue that they have asked to be raised on an upcoming meeting, so there can be input there too.
Okay.
But again, we're always worried about public meetings laws, so usually those are just— those meetings are just me and Executive Director Wesley and maybe a couple of other folks.
Sameer Kanal 1:37:05 - 1:37:17
Okay, so my question then for Marcelino and specifically for Marcelino is, would you be willing to ask that there be a discussion of that settlement at a PROSPER board meeting in public?
Marcelino Alvarez 1:37:18 - 1:38:08
Again, I think Executive Director Wesley set it up in such a way that kind of established the history of it.
I think if there was a, Thank you.
Thank you, Mayor.
I think that's a very pressing conversation.
Obviously, it seems to be a clear point of discussion.
If there is a, I guess, if there is standing for Prosper to take that on, and we're saying that's input coming from council, I'm happy to recommend that as a discussion point.
I can't commit to any sort of action or changing necessarily the basis for it.
But if you're saying, hey, we think that Prosper needs to discuss this as input from the city, I mean, this is what we're here to collaborate and listen.
You're saying it's an issue.
Let's have a conversation.
Again, that doesn't change whether or not Prosper has standing on it.
So if the input is we'd love to talk about it and create a forum for it, I'm happy to make that recommendation.
Sameer Kanal 1:38:08 - 1:38:12
Thank you.
Councilor Green.
Mitch Green 1:38:12 - 1:41:05
Thank you.
Councilor Koyama Lane kind of touched on some stuff with the Main and Old Town that I think was an important conversation.
Thank you.
It's been a bailiwick of mine.
It's in my district.
So I won't repeat a lot of that.
There's one element to it, though, I want to connect back to.
This is relevant for you, Commissioner, is under the charter, PROSPERS, our urban renewal— well, we don't call it that anymore, but our economic development and our sort of TIF district management entity, and we've delegated that to yes.
But it's always conditioned upon council-approved plans and action plans.
That's Chapter 25 of the charter.
And so for Old Town, that was the Old Town Action Plan.
And I think what I'd like some assurance with, just to kind of close the loop a little bit on this conversation, is there is the underwriting part of that conversation, and we've talked about that, but there's also the sort of, is the investment yes.
And the Old Town Action Plan had significant outlays or sort of intention for investing in cultural institutions and kind of the building up of a cultural district.
And it does point to sort of like grounding that in community.
I think community is ill-defined and maybe lacks a little bit of definition there.
And so I think when you have a board that gets taken over by interests thank you.
So when we're talking about board of directors who are principals in the party to transaction, that's something that I always want the board at Prosper to be looking at carefully.
It's like, does the Old Town Community Association represent the community more broadly, or is it representing the commercial interests of those who have the majority votes on the board?
And that's going to be true for all of our TIF districts.
That's going to be true for all of our neighborhood associations.
And so that's an important piece of this kind of like I think that's a soft oversight question that we need to be engaging on.
We recently had a briefing from Metro on the polling numbers on the next housing bond, and it's not looking good.
And when you ask respondents why they're not going to open their wallets up again, they say there's been a lack of oversight and transparency on public funds.
And so I think that's probably directed at the jurisdictions, City of Portland, you know, All the city governments.
But I— but we— but people are reading stories about Made in Old Town during all, all that.
And so Prosper Portland's balance sheet matters too when we think about that public confidence and transparency.
And so, um, before we move on from this episode with Made in Old Town, I, I really need to understand— I really need to know that we are looking closely at what does it mean to have good governance around the connectedness between our action plan on the and I think Councilor Colonel Millane kind of hit on that there, and I just, I wanted to connect it back as a councilor for this district.
I don't know if you have a response for that.
Marcelino Alvarez 1:41:06 - 1:43:09
Happy to.
Sure.
I mean, I think at a high level, obviously I don't have a sense of who's on the board of the neighborhood association for Old Town specifically or the background and context, but I think through the lens of what we saw at the process Portland board, you know, there were a number of members from community, from industry, from the neighborhood that, you know, did pledge their support in terms of the program.
You know, I think Executive Director Wesley talked about, you know, some of the lessons from, you know, the Prosper perspective and how we look at programs like this in the future from a peer governor's perspective.
And I think that's an important part of it.
You know, I think again, through the lens of an entrepreneur and of someone, you know, who is and, you know, obviously the risky business of starting companies, you know, there are, you know, 70% of companies that will fail, right?
And I think anytime that we present our company to an investor, we have to present, you know, a set of due diligence documents.
I think when we're on the receiving end of that, on the Prosper side, we're kind of asking, we are asking the same questions that, you know, through the lens of investment.
And, You know, we have to take what is presented in front of us and do the research on top of that to come to an equitable decision.
And sometimes we get it right, sometimes we get it wrong.
I think to your point, and maybe this is more of a personal point for me to kind of take and carry on forward, just understanding whether or not the voices that are being heard at a particular testimony are necessarily representative of the community writ large.
And again, I think perhaps that's an invitation for more connections with Council, where as agenda items are coming up and there are, you know, issues that perhaps, uh, or agenda items that are, um, you know, important to the communities or will have impact on the communities, uh, working with your offices to make sure that the right voices are there at the table and just making sure, you know, if you have the beat on who those should be, that we're inviting them to participate for either public testimony or even just meeting with, uh, the Prosper Board ahead of, ahead of a I appreciate that invitation.
Gustavo Cruz 1:43:10 - 1:43:10
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 1:43:11 - 1:43:18
Thank you.
Seeing that the queue is exhausted, we need a, uh, we would need a motion to refer this item to council, uh, full council.
Olivia Clark 1:43:18 - 1:43:19
So moved.
Or second?
Sameer Kanal 1:43:19 - 1:43:28
I'll take the motion from Vice Chair Ryan and second from Councilor Clark.
Is there any further discussion?
Seeing none, Rebecca, will you please call the roll?
Dana Dickman 1:43:32 - 1:43:36
Calling the roll on 2026-224.
Rebecca Dobert 1:43:37 - 1:43:38
Koyama Lane?
Tiffany Koyama Lane 1:43:38 - 1:43:38
Aye.
Rebecca Dobert 1:43:39 - 1:43:40
Murillo?
Angelita Morillo 1:43:40 - 1:43:40
Aye.
Rebecca Dobert 1:43:41 - 1:43:41
Novick?
Steve Novick 1:43:42 - 1:43:42
Aye.
Rebecca Dobert 1:43:42 - 1:43:43
Clark?
Olivia Clark 1:43:43 - 1:43:46
Thank you for your willingness to serve.
Aye.
Rebecca Dobert 1:43:46 - 1:43:46
Green?
Mitch Green 1:43:47 - 1:43:47
Aye.
Rebecca Dobert 1:43:48 - 1:43:48
Zimmerman?
Eric Zimmerman 1:43:48 - 1:43:48
Aye.
Rebecca Dobert 1:43:49 - 1:43:50
Ryan?
Dan Ryan 1:43:51 - 1:43:51
Aye.
Rebecca Dobert 1:43:59 - 1:43:59
Kanal.
Sameer Kanal 1:44:00 - 1:44:03
Thanks for stepping up.
Looking forward to talking about this at council.
Aye.
Dana Dickman 1:44:04 - 1:44:06
And the motion is approved with 11 ayes, 1 vote.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 1:44:07 - 1:44:15
The report, document number 2026-224, is, uh, referred to City Council with the recommendation it be accepted.
Cornel Wesley 1:44:15 - 1:44:16
Thank you.
Marcelino Alvarez 1:44:16 - 1:44:17
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 1:44:17 - 1:56:28
Uh, colleagues, we're going to take a, a 10-minute break for, uh, before we come back and do Vision Zero.
And I just wanted to mention also, for those who who signed up to testify for Zenith, we're not shortening testimony.
Anyone who doesn't— we don't get to today, we will pick up at the next meeting.
Um, so you will get your 3 minutes.
I just wanted to be clear about that.
Thanks.
We'll be back at, uh, 11:21.
We have someone back.
All right, we're gonna bring it back.
Welcome back.
It appears our committee room has gotten very lively.
We'll, we'll be resuming the meeting.
Um, I'm about to do a clap once if you can hear me thing, but I'm not going to get there.
Uh, all right, we're gonna pick back up with, uh, item 3.
And we will, which is, sorry, Rebecca, would you please call item 3?
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 1:56:29 - 1:56:33
Item 3, Vision Zero Updates, document number 2026-262.
Sameer Kanal 1:56:34 - 1:56:42
Thank you.
And I'm gonna pass it, I'm not sure if I should be passing it to who first, but I think to Vice Chair Koyama Lane to introduce the item and then to Dana Dickman.
Dana Dickman 1:56:43 - 1:56:43
Thank you, Chair.
Tiffany Koyama Lane 1:56:44 - 1:59:11
It will be no surprise to anyone that I'm looking forward to this discussion about Vision Zero today.
Dana Dickman, our citywide Vision Zero lead, is here to talk with us about what she and many of the city employees often call hard work and heart work.
As a reminder, in September 2025, we unanimously recommitted to Vision Zero, which aims to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries.
Our commitment on this council backs up the work that city staff and community have been doing and reaffirms that we because of that commitment, Vision Zero is truly a citywide initiative impacting all districts in Portland.
We asked for this briefing to come before the Committee of the Whole so every councilor has an opportunity to ask questions and get information at the same time.
Like many of our constituents, I've personally seen and felt the impacts of deaths in District 3 very directly in my own neighborhood and community.
This includes a beloved community elder, a neighborhood librarian.
Each life lost matters, and each person lost is a neighbor.
These preventable deaths leave huge holes in our communities, and I would like to honor them with a moment of silence.
Aye.
The numbers this year are not going in the direction that we want in specific areas and districts.
Even while overall rates are trending downward, the numbers are always more dire in marginalized communities, communities of color, low-income neighborhoods.
This is not okay.
Reaching and sustaining zero traffic deaths and serious injuries will require significant investment and changes to our streets and our communities.
I want to genuinely thank every single one of my colleagues here for their support on our Vision Zero goals, and I want to continue to underscore the need for ongoing collaboration.
As requested by my colleagues, the presentation we're about to hear will touch on trends in all districts because this touches all of us.
So please help me welcome our citywide Vision Zero lead, Dana Dickman.
She's going to talk about the city's work to further develop a citywide approach to eliminating traffic deaths and to share some current crash information to get us on the same page for future budget and policy decisions.
And with that, I will pass it over to Dana Dickman.
Thank you for being here.
Dana Dickman 1:59:18 - 2:21:06
There we go.
Now I see the green light.
For the record, good morning, councilors.
My name is Dana Dickman.
I'm the Vision Zero policy manager for the city.
Thank you so much for having me here today.
I'm really excited to have this conversation.
There's no specific decisions or actions that I need you to take today, but this is really setting the stage for shared information, shared understanding, for discussions that we're going to continue to have in the future, and for opportunities for you all to reach out to me and our colleagues across the city to understand more about the policies and the budget decisions that you're making.
I really want to be a resource.
In that frame, I just want to remind everyone that my role is now focused citywide to be a technical liaison and lead to help guide the city towards zero deaths.
I work with our city administrator, our DCAs, directors, and staff within the bureaus to help us figure out what implementation looks like for Vision Zero and Safe Systems.
And in that role, I'm also a resource to all of you.
So again, this is an open discussion for you all to get more information and to think about the places that you might want us.
And when I say us, that's broadly myself and folks working across all the service areas to come back and talk to you about Vision Zero work.
There are staff here today from PBOT, from the Police Bureau, from BPS, and agency partners, including Multnomah County.
Public Health that will can support our discussion.
If there are questions that are very specific to their work, we can call them up and bring them in as part of the discussion.
I also just want to acknowledge and thank the tireless and dedicated community members who are true ongoing partners in this work today.
I know that Oregon Walks and Families for Safe Streets are here, and.
I just want to continue to lift up that those community members are so important.
I heard during the previous piece that there are more folks that want to engage and talk about Vision Zero, and I just want to acknowledge that dedication.
So our agenda today is really an update on last fall's resolution.
We haven't had a chance to kind of come back and talk about the work that's ongoing.
A lot of that is sort of largely unseen but happening.
Share what's called the Safe Systems Pyramid, which is really helping to ground us in those connections to a public health approach.
Have some current data, some district data, and then kind of some— make some of those connections from that data to that multidisciplinary approach.
Councilor Koyama Lane already went over this a little bit, but I want to just remind everyone what was in that resolution.
There was that recommitment to the work of eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries, the direction to really have cross-bureau collaboration and to implement strategies to reduce traffic violence and fatalities, and a specific direction to establish a Vision Zero task force and to update our action plan with a citywide focus, meaning that we would have actions across all the service areas.
There was also a specific reference to more reporting and accountability.
So that is part of the reason why I'm in here today, to make sure that we are having this ongoing dialogue about the work.
So we'll first talk about the task force.
We have established a group internally to work, again, across all the service areas.
We began meeting this last April, and the task force is essentially 2 different bodies working together.
We have an executive leadership group.
Thank you.
Which is comprised of deputy city administrators, directors from key bureaus, and chiefs or their designees from police and fire.
That's about 14 people.
And then we also have the technical team, which includes subject matter experts from across all the service areas and leads, folks that are really deeply involved in implementing the work in their various disciplines.
So that comprises about 40 people.
Really working to focus on Vision Zero across the city.
The work that we're focusing on this year is developing that shared citywide action plan, understanding the work across teams.
One of the most amazing things that I've found when we're getting together in these groups is how eager people are to more deeply understand each other's work and to support each other.
We have sort of a long history of keeping our blinders on and working on the thing that we work on.
And it's been really inspiring to see folks just get, you know, pretty jazzed about collaborating to eliminate traffic fatalities.
The last piece is just like identifying those areas where we can really leverage each other's skills, data, and the investments that are happening across the city for this shared goal.
The work of the action plan is, it's really just a beginning, but we are, we have started that work.
This graphic that you're seeing is really just a high-level timeline for a year-long process where we are gonna be developing a prioritized work plan across the bureaus that move us towards zero fatalities.
We know that a 1-year timeline is fairly ambitious for something that we're trying to create collaboration across the whole city, but we're moving towards that in order to create a framework for allocating staff resources, supporting annual budget discussions, and providing clarity to the public about the work that we are doing.
So I frame that up because I wanna lift up that it will be an iterative process.
We're looking at a 5-year plan, 2027 through 2032.
Thank you.
31, But there will be iterative actions within there, things we're working on the first year that will then build in, in the subsequent years.
I will just reference the schedule, a couple of things.
We are already in, you know, July, August, so we're working into this sort of gap analysis phase where we're looking at where do we want to be and where are the gaps in the work that we're doing.
As you move through that schedule, you can expect to be hearing back either through committee or through council what some of the drafts of those actions are coming out.
And around April or May, that's when we're looking to come back with a draft plan and share that.
So not too long from now, really looking at an updated action plan, but you can expect to be getting more updates throughout the process.
And and to that point, I'm going to talk a little bit more about the reporting.
You all have been getting weekly updates on year-to-date crash data.
Sometimes I don't send them weekly.
If there has not been a fatal crash, I send them biweekly.
That's in part because I want to preserve everyone's brains, including my own, and not necessarily focus on that every week unless we need to.
Also, on a monthly basis, you're getting the year-to-date update, which is also a public-facing document in the City Administrator's Report.
And starting next month, there's going to be a resolution update memo in the City Administrator's Report quarterly.
So just a short memo that's going to update on all the different things happening with the action plan, the task force.
So you'll have access to that information, and also the public will have access We'd also like to add district briefings on alternate months starting in September and October.
And that can be either things that I know that you having more information would be helpful, or I can work with you and your chiefs to understand what the district might need more information about.
And then when timely, committee briefings on policy and program issues.
I know this sounds like a lot.
I think it's a lot.
But you're already engaging with Vision Zero issues every day.
And this is an opportunity to make sure that you are getting the right information and have the ability to act in a really proactive matter on these issues.
But be thinking about that there are new opportunities through those district briefings, and I'm always willing to work with our bureau partners to come and bring more information to committee meetings.
I want to touch on a couple of key amendments from the resolution as well.
There was deep concern amongst council members about the overrepresentation of folks experiencing houselessness in our community in our fatal crashes.
It's a deep concern of everyone who works on this, of our partners at Public Health.
In early winter of this year, we worked with our partners to essentially scope a deeper analysis of risk factors for people experiencing houselessness.
We're kind of working through that, looking at the findings and developing recommendations, and we hope to have a report that will come back to you in the fall that can then inform actions and next steps in our action plan.
Another piece that was brought up and lifted up in that conversation was the desire to have meaningful public engagement in the analysis.
In the action plan.
But a big kind of sticking point was around informing communities of the new action plan, making sure that people understood what work was coming, what changes were coming, and how it might impact and engage in their neighborhoods.
That is something that is really important to all of us that work on this.
I really want to underscore that we already have a lot of information from community.
We are fortunate to have been working on this for 10 years.
We have information that comes through projects, through programs, through 311.
We know a lot about what people want to see in their communities in terms of safety.
So I'll just sort of say that before I jump into the piece of— we requested specific funds through outreach internally through a response to the budget amendments last We're all very well aware of our fiscally constrained situation.
So we do not have those specific funds for outreach.
We also asked for external funds, for grant funding from the state.
They limited those funds, and those funds are also not available this year.
So as we are working as a broader city team to work on community outreach, what I am doing is working to look at existing events and see if we can places where people are already out in community and connecting with those opportunities to talk about Vision Zero.
An example this summer is typically transportation wouldn't have a big presence at National Night Out, but we are connecting on Vision Zero with our public safety partners and talking about it.
That is a place where community members are already gonna be gathering.
There's already organizing behind it, and we're gonna use those opportunities to get out in community even though we don't have resources specifically I'm going to pivot.
That's kind of the end of the update on the resolution.
Again, we're going to have time after where you can ask more questions, dig deeper.
I'm also happy to come back and dig a little bit deeper into information.
We're going to talk about the Safe Systems Pyramid, which is a framework that further connects the work of, sorry, transportation safety to a prevention and proactive approach through public health.
Vision Zero policies are rooted in safe system principles.
You've all seen this graphic before.
This is looking at the layers, protective layers in a system that we are using to create that, Ability to avoid crashes or reduce severity should they occur.
I'll reiterate some of the basic principles.
Deaths and serious injuries are preventive— I'm sorry, are unacceptable.
Safety is proactive and grounded in prevention.
Humans are vulnerable.
People are going to make mistakes in the system.
Responsibility is shared and redundancy is crucial.
Thank you.
Again, these are things that you've heard before, but I want to kind of ground us in that as we talk about kind of public health practice.
Public health practice, I'm gonna read this slide, just bear with me, is founded on the idea that health problems are preventable when addressed at the population level, and that we should focus on preventing and controlling risk factors while promoting protective factors when possible.
So think about how we are moving to that population impact frame as we think about traffic safety.
Many road interventions are effective at the individual level, but require individual effort to have the attendant effect.
Think about seatbelts or other mechanisms that require an individual action to have that effect.
This can result in decreasing population health impact.
So improving road safety in the aggregate as we're shifting is really about prioritizing effectiveness of the intervention itself as well as the public health impact.
So let's take a look at this graphic.
What this is showing is a series of measures, series of things that we can do to impact traffic safety and where you need more of that increased individual effort for it to be effective and where it's going to have more of an increased population impact.
So at the bottom of the period, we have a, like, a big chunk through socioeconomic factors.
Socioeconomic factors are things like affordable housing.
Areas designed to have access to transit, zoning reform, big picture pieces that are connected to people's income, social determinants of health, ways in which people are accessing their community.
At the next level, it's built environment.
So this is what we typically think of.
These are street design changes, can be roundabouts, can be road reorganizations, raised crosswalks, different interventions on the street that really change the built environment.
Then we're moving up into latent safety measures, signal timing, speed safety cameras, active measures.
And at this level, you're starting to have more of that need to have individual action.
So looking at signs, officer enforcement, and then at the top, we have driver education programs, And campaigns.
I want to be clear that I'm not saying we don't need to do all of these things.
We do.
But that we're going to have more of that population or more impact at those population levels.
Those investments take longer.
They're more expensive.
And I'll also add that they may be something that creates more pushback in community when we're talking about changes to housing, land use, built environment, those are gonna be changes that are gonna be felt by community members.
And so we are talking about investment both financially and politically in those population impact layers of the pyramid.
Again, I wanna be really clear that I'm not saying that we can't— we're gonna accept bad behavior and that we don't expect people to be decent, Thank you.
I don't think that we need to be decent and we don't need to have education and active measures, but relying on individuals is not the most effective investment strategy or prevention strategy to get us the safety outcomes.
We're going to leave this here, but we'll come back to it.
We'll come back to it today, and I'm going to continue to come back to it as we talk about kind of policy and budget and how we think about the citywide approach to Vision Zero.
Now we're going to push into some data.
I know that a lot of you were asked what you wanted to hear today.
Folks definitely said they wanted to understand what was happening with current data and then have a little bit about district information as well.
I know we don't have a ton of time, so I'm not diving super deep into the data, but there— if there is something that you want to dive into, again, we can do that follow-up.
I think all of you know that this is actually one off by one.
We are at 25 fatalities this year.
Um, I prepped the data before we had a fatal crash on Sunday night.
Um, that's worse than last year in July, but it's still noticeably better than the previous 4 years.
You can see as you're looking at this data, we did have a significantly better year last year, but we are still doing better than we had in the previous 4 years.
This graphic represents kind of a change in that 4-year data by mode and overall.
We're still trending 12% down.
From that 4-year average.
So we're still seeing a decrease.
We're still seeing a decrease in pedestrian deaths, which is great to see.
A significant drop in our vehicle crash deaths.
But you can see that big orange line in the center.
We have a huge spike with motorcycle fatalities this year.
We're up 67%.
11 Of our 25 fatalities have involved people on motorcycles.
There's some trends we're seeing, not just this year but previous years.
Definitely some driver behavior with people turning in front of motorcycles, but also on the part of the motorcycle operators, excessive speed, impairment, lane splitting, passing on the right, behaviors that are very dangerous when you're riding a motorcycle.
When we see trends like this, there's not a lot that we can do to pivot really quickly.
But there are some things that we can do.
PPB and PBOT have now partnered twice on news releases to again raise awareness of this spike.
In April, when we saw multiple motorcycle crashes, there was a news release and some press.
And then also this week, you may have seen the press on Tuesday, just again reminding folks how vulnerable people are on motorcycles.
And how powerful they are, really trying to get those messages out.
So when we see something like this, we can't shift super fast, but we can be talking about it in community and really acknowledging these challenges.
This graphic is an extended period of data, and I just wanted to share it because what it shows us is that significant spike kind of for all modes during the COVID periods.
This is a rolling average over 12 months, but you can see we're starting to trend down.
We're still far too high.
39 people last year is still far too many, but we're getting down more to that baseline that we were before we saw that really significant spike during the COVID years.
So that gives me—.
Thank you.
A lot of hope that we can press in and reduce that number further.
I'm going to get us into some district data now.
This is just a high-level map that's a little bit different than what you've seen before.
This is a 5-year data set.
I'll remind everyone that when we're looking at serious injuries and fatal crashes, we're relying on data from the state 2024 is the most— is the last year that we have complete data of serious injury and fatal.
That's why we have it only through 2024.
This graphic represents a more detailed view, concentration of serious injuries and deadly crashes.
So this is looking at segmented segments across the city.
Where we have repeat crashes on roadways in the city.
The information on the side— oh, I should mention, and you probably are all realizing this, you all have versions of these in your packets.
So high-resolution versions that you can look at, you can look at in more detail, and they have a little bit more information than what is on the slides.
Thank you.
Mr.
Cornel Wesley 2:21:06 - 2:21:09
Chair, what constitutes a serious crash?
Dana Dickman 2:21:10 - 2:32:42
It's usually someone in— it usually includes bicycle and pedestrian crashes, but it's some sort of—.
It could—.
It doesn't always include life-altering injury, but something that requires transporting or something that requires medical attention.
So if you are in a vehicle crash and you have some aches and pains and you never reported it, that would not be included in this, even though there might be an injury.
So the information that's included on this slide is really just compiling that deadly crash data.
Again, we have almost 70% of our fatal crashes involve impairment, and that's impairment of all people involved in the crash.
That could be driver, that could be the pedestrian or bicyclist.
And about 40%, it's— we know it's the driver.
We have a significant number of hit-and-run crashes that we don't know the impairment of the driver.
So I share that because we know that it's a significant contributing factor, but the data isn't always 100% In 49% of our fatal crashes, speed was noted to play a role.
So in almost 50%, we know that it was excessive speeds or something contributing to the crash.
I flag this because this wouldn't be noted as a contributing factor to the crash if you're driving on a street that's 40 miles per— posted at 40 miles per hour and you were going 40.
But we'll talk a little bit later about speed, and we heard in some testimony that when we're operating at those speeds, it is a contributing factor to the crash, but it doesn't get counted as that in kind of our fatal crash data.
56% Of our fatal crashes were on streets with 4 or more lanes.
Again, I flag this because it's such a clear street design issue.
And for pedestrians, that number rises to almost 60%.
Now we're going to jump a little bit more into the district data.
One of the reasons I wanted to share this is because it's pretty interesting that we have some, a lot of similarities across the districts.
We see that pedestrians are represented at about 15, 16%.
There are some differences in percentages, but those modal trends are consistent across the districts.
We see higher numbers in District 1 overall.
I know that we didn't have that last year, but that's— that was last year was sort of inconsistent with the ongoing 5 and 10-year trends.
And then we see District 2 and District 3 being fairly similar often, and District 4 being kind of the lowest for overall traffic fatalities and serious injuries.
This is a cropped-in view of just District 1.
I want to call out sort of the high density of multi-lane streets and intersections with those high crash concentrations.
You can see it's like virtually all of the east-west corridors are some of the streets that are having those high-risk factors and those repeated crashes with injury and fatalities.
I don't think this is a surprise to anyone, but I can list multiple corridors, like on both the north-south and east-west, where we can expect to see serious injuries and fatalities.
In District 2, you can see a little bit more spread, but the couple of things that I really want to call out is we continue to have issues with the areas with industrial industrial land uses and our freight corridors.
Again, no surprise to the District 2 councilors that we can— we continue to see a lot of fatalities on Columbia Boulevard, on Lombard, on Marine Drive.
One of the unique things that your district experiences though is a preponderance of street racing and sideshow activity, and that has contributed to fatal crashes and certainly injuries and injuries.
So that again, like, you see that there are these trends across the city, but each one of the districts is facing slightly unique problems around traffic safety and traffic violence.
In District 3, again, we have those high-volume multimodal streets.
We have state-ordained corridors.
Powell Boulevard is consistently in our top 3 for fatalities when we look at 5- and 10-year data.
And then a kind of a unique thing about the district is we have multiple schools directly on high-crash streets.
We have Cleveland and Kellogg directly on Powell, and we have Vestal and McDaniel directly on 82nd.
And those are a vulnerable population, and it really brings together that nexus of wanting to care for our most vulnerable and like those issues around high-crash wide streets.
So that it's something that's a bit unique to District 3.
While I'm talking about that though, I'll just sort of bring up that the corridors, the crashes don't care anything about the districts.
82Nd is a really good example of where multiple districts intersect that particular street.
It's a high-crash corridor.
We have a number of challenging intersections.
I'm thinking of Holgate and McLaughlin that is both District District 3 and District 4.
So when I'm sharing the data with you this way, because it's easier for you to understand and how you're thinking about the work that you're doing in your district, but we're, we're not necessarily thinking about that way.
We're looking at the corridors, we're looking at how they're intersecting with each other all the time.
And then in District 4, you can see those concentrations in the density sections of downtown.
But then you're also seeing, like, there isn't a lot of— there aren't a lot of corridors, but what there are are those multi-lane streets with little friction and high speeds.
And when I say that, I'm talking about Barbur Boulevard, Beaverton Hillsdale Highway.
They have lower density land use.
They function a little bit more like a highway.
And those are some of the highest crash areas in District 4.
Those larger streets, those places where you're seeing a lot of volume and not a lot of cues for people to look for multimodal use and to slow down.
Now I'm going to jump a little bit into something that's bringing together the data, the citywide work, and what we learned about the safe systems pyramid.
I know you've all seen this graphic before, but it's really important again to ground ourselves in that information that risk of death and serious injury rises dramatically as speeds go up.
When we're talking about population-level impact, when we're talking about the work we need to do, that piece of slowing speeds in the city is truly fundamental and needs to be part of In the 5 years between 2020 to 2024, 555 people were killed or seriously injured in crashes where speed was a primary factor.
That's a lot of people in a 5-year period that were impacted by high speeds in the city.
If we think about that in this public health frame, Speed is acting as essentially a pathogen in our environment that can impact severity or incidence of a crash.
We really want to hone in on that risk factor and try to address it in our prevention framework.
This graphic that you're now seeing is data over a longer period of time, and what this is is speed-related deaths and serious injury data by time of day and day of week.
Oh, wow.
And what you'll notice is that you can see that the red, the higher number of crashes, are really spreading towards those darkness hours.
Again, this is something you've all heard before.
We have more crashes, particularly pedestrian crashes at night.
But what I'm seeing there is that is places where we have the least congestion in the city as well.
So that means that speeds are able to go up, people are able to travel faster.
Yeah.
And that's leading to more serious and fatal crashes.
I'll just note that last piece on the bottom of the slide.
68% Of traffic deaths and serious injuries with pedestrians occurred from dusk to dawn.
We have the increase in speed and a lessened ability to actually see people and interact out on the street.
So you've got kind of the double whammy of increased speed with less knowledge and less ability to react to it.
This data essentially shows highway speeds on non-highway streets.
So what you're looking at, the dots that you're looking at, are representing areas where we have count data, or not count data, but speeds data, 5-year data that is telling us where we have 85th percentile or 85% of the people traveling on roads where they're exceeding 40 miles per hour.
And if we're going back to that acknowledgement that if you're going 40 miles per hour, you're outside a vehicle, you're basically 80% likely to have a fatal incident.
We have places all over the city where people are traveling significantly over that.
And many of these, we— I think most of you know, we don't have a lot of places with 50 and 60 mile per hour.
Yeah.
These are places where folks are traveling 10, 15, 20 miles per hour over the speed limit on a regular basis.
So we're going to expect to see fatal and serious crashes in these locations.
This is a graphic that takes the data that you've been looking at in all of those district pieces and just highlights where we have streets with 4 or more lanes.
Again, not a lot of surprises here, but I want to hone in on the fact that this is only 4% of the streets in the city, and that's where we're having that 56% of fatal crashes is just on 4% of the streets.
So that combination of the ability to speed, challenges with crossing, challenges with turning movements, that multi-lane environment, those are the places where we're seeing kind of the most We're going to go back to our safe systems pyramid and talk through the ways in which we're doing work currently and things that we want to dig in on more to kind of address this issue.
So at the top of that pyramid, I know that many of you weren't here, but most of you were in the city.
You'll remember our 20 Is Plenty campaign, really trying to get people to recognize slower speeds on local streets are safe.
Olivia Clark 2:32:43 - 2:32:43
I think that's a great point.
Dana Dickman 2:32:43 - 2:35:58
Were very important.
We've had the Struck campaign and other speed-focused campaign work.
We also have officer enforcement.
Our traffic division focuses on the high-crash network, really does a lot of work looking at those places where we have consistent history of crashes, really focusing the limited resources we have on the places where we think we can have the most impact.
We have a speed safety camera program.
We're working on Rest in Red on signals.
You've heard a little bit about that.
That's essentially having signals on main corridors stay in a red focus for in the evening hours between 10 PM and say 6 AM so that people aren't seeing a green all the way down the corridors.
I bring that one up because it's an opportunity to use existing infrastructure to help us figure out how to slow speeds and address these safety issues.
We also do have road reorganization, center medians, things like trees in the curb zone.
We're about to have a significant investment in climate that could also be connected to Vision Zero.
Thousands of trees could be used to create vertical enclosure, a different environment that can help us to deal with this issue of speed on our streets.
And then in that socioeconomic factors, the work that we have done as a city to focus on Main Street development with pedestrian-oriented streets and access to transit, that actually does help us in this work around speed.
So it's like making those connections and continuing to understand how there is this through line between all of these different pieces that we're doing in order to address that's all the information that I have for you today, but I have a couple of requests, and then we'll get into the discussion.
The first one is just to reach out and ask questions when you get those weekly and biweekly crash notes.
If you want to know more about the crash, I can connect you with the crash investigators.
If you just want to understand more about what's happening in your districts, Please do use that as an opportunity to get more information.
Because we do not have a lot of resources to do outreach, I'm asking all of you to share summer and fall opportunities when you will be out in community and can share Vision Zero information.
Myself or other staff from the bureaus could join and could have just an opportunity to engage around Vision Zero.
So please do share if that feels like a good opportunity with work that you're already going to be doing.
And then contact us early for data and information when conflicts arise in implementation of projects or policies.
I am a resource.
The folks in the— technical folks in the bureaus are amazing and ready to help support you in policy and budgeting discussions.
So please contact us early so we can get that information.
Thank you.
To you.
And with that, I just want to turn it back over to you.
Thank you so much.
Sameer Kanal 2:35:59 - 2:36:16
Thank you, Dana.
Appreciate it.
And thank you to Councilor Koyama Lane, Vice Chair Koyama Lane as well.
Um, colleagues, we have a limited amount of time for this item before we get to the next, so I'm going to ask 2 questions.
Um, just process-wise, are you able to come back to us when we do the testimony on this as well?
Dana Dickman 2:36:16 - 2:36:17
Oh, absolutely.
Okay.
Sameer Kanal 2:36:18 - 2:36:33
Uh, and then we We'll probably talk about continuing as opposed to closing the item then as a result of it.
So I'm going to take myself out of the queue.
I'll ask if we can keep this going for about 8 more minutes.
And then, yeah, so I'll go to Clark, then Green.
And if we can just try to keep it as brief as you can.
Olivia Clark 2:36:33 - 2:38:17
Thank you, Mr.
Chair.
I'll try to be real quick.
And you don't have to answer this today, Dana.
Thank you so much for all the data and information.
It's very helpful.
I understand that Vision Zero is really a national program, and I was wondering if maybe you can come back with some comparative analysis, how we stack up against other comparable cities, what's going on nationwide, and—.
Absolutely.
You know, what are we doing right, what are we doing wrong compared to what other cities have done?
You don't have to do that today.
I think that would be helpful for us.
I also would like to hear more about what our plans are for more of the, what you call the reader boards, and some of those higher things that are higher on the hierarchy.
And more speed cameras, how we can get more speed cameras.
I know they've been really effective in District 4 on Beaverton Hillsdale Highway.
And I'd like to hear also, maybe you can bring in somebody from the traffic division to talk a little bit about their resources, how they deploy their resources.
I think they have very limited resources to deploy.
Where are they focused?
You mentioned high crash corridors, but there's also the speed racing issue that I'd like to hear more about.
Um, I think that's really dangerous, and it's happening in probably all of our districts.
I can hear them at night, um, through my bedroom window on the Sewall Bridge.
Um, yeah, um, and just other, um, other deterrents.
Um, you know, we can't control human behavior.
I know that when I've been involved It's amazing the distracted drivers putting on their makeup, brushing their teeth, whatever, on their phone.
Unbelievable.
Anyway, if you could come back with some of those, I'd be really appreciative.
Dana Dickman 2:38:18 - 2:38:39
We have a couple of folks from the traffic division here with us.
I feel like that is a larger conversation to have.
But if you want to hear just about how they deploy their current I don't know, do we have time for that, or should we— I'm happy to have them come back and do more of a presentation on their work too.
There's a lot there.
Olivia Clark 2:38:40 - 2:38:43
I would like to hear from the traffic division maybe next time you come back.
Tiffany Koyama Lane 2:38:44 - 2:38:44
Great.
Dana Dickman 2:38:46 - 2:38:52
And I do have a colleague here, Michael Espinoza, that's taking detailed notes so that I will have all the things that you're asking for.
Olivia Clark 2:38:52 - 2:38:53
Terrific.
Thanks, Dana.
Gustavo Cruz 2:38:55 - 2:38:55
Thanks.
Sameer Kanal 2:38:55 - 2:38:56
Councilor Green, then Ryan.
Mitch Green 2:38:57 - 2:41:16
Thanks.
And I'm being mindful of time here.
I'm going to tee some questions up or some themes that maybe when we have more time at the next— when we carry this over, we can get into more detail.
But I really appreciate the work and the dedication to the data.
It's not lost on me that West Burnside in my district is one of the big high-crash corridors.
It's also one of the corridors that has like maybe some of the narrowest sidewalks proportional to the vehicle volume that happens through there.
And then we're also going to pursue a repaving project right now that doesn't address some of the lower-tiered investments that we would do to address the threat of pedestrian deaths there.
And I'd like to hear a little bit more from DCA Donna Paul and the city administrator next time when we have more time why we're proceeding on a paving project like this.
What is the decision process that has led us down that road when we also know that we've recommitted as a council to take Vision Zero seriously?
And you can't do your job if we don't have the partnership with the rest of the city administration and organization to say, let's sequence these things in a way that makes sense.
Because if we just do a paving project without considering those other aspects, we're probably not going to come back to it anytime soon.
And that's just the fact of the matter and the reality.
And so I'm really curious to see where that's coming from, because it's not coming from the adopted plans, because if it were, it wouldn't happen this way.
So I guess— and I'm also really worried that most recently, very recently, we were scrapping or shelving plans to do bike lane enhancements on Alder, and that seems to be a sort of thank you.
I think that's a theme where it's like there's a narrow set of feedback that pushes back against a thing that's really rooted in our plans, that is designed to address pedestrian safety.
And then I don't know if it's a few councilors or it's the mayor or someone who says, don't worry, I got it, we'll roll this back.
That is not Vision Zero.
And so I know that you can only do so much here because your role is— I mean, you're not a deputy city administrator, you're not the city administrator, but and I know that we're on the clock here, but these are really pressing issues for the community and they're in my district.
So I just invite a conversation around this and would like to know more.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 2:41:17 - 2:41:17
Thank you, Councilor Green.
Dana Dickman 2:41:17 - 2:41:29
This is DC Priyadana Paul for Public Works.
We are taking notes on all the different issues that you brought up and we are happy to follow up at the next presentation or an email to council.
Mitch Green 2:41:29 - 2:41:30
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 2:41:30 - 2:41:44
Thanks.
And we'll probably not have a chance to get too deep into this today, but I am going to continue the item on.
I'll just say I want to make sure that all 4 of the folks in the queue have a chance to get questions on the record that we can revisit going forward.
So I'll go Councilor Ryan and then Koyama Lane.
Dan Ryan 2:41:47 - 2:43:09
Thank you, Chair.
Thank you, Dana Dickman, for showing up and giving a thorough update.
When reviewing the data from '21 to '24, 2 things continue to stick out very clearly to me.
Our homeless population, which makes up 2% of the population, represents 49% of the pedestrian deaths.
And so I want to dig into that a little bit more.
It's so sad.
I'm focusing on this population and getting to the bottom of these challenges and being bold to actually improve services so that things can improve will always be my North Star.
And with that in mind, I'm going to pivot to our meeting that we had in March.
A little over 4 months ago, I was able to finally receive information that I asked for several years ago about the data coming from the coroner's office on who tracks the level of methamphetamines, um, AKA fentanyl and meth, in the bloodstream of those pedestrians who perished on our streets from traffic accidents.
And as you recall, the data was, um, it was lagging, mostly due to what was told, not being a budget priority.
And so I think it dated back to '21, '22.
And the number of those revealing that methamphetamines were in their bloodstream was quite high.
Do you recall that percentage?
I recall 82% to 84%.
That sounds right.
Dana Dickman 2:43:09 - 2:43:11
Yeah, that it was in the high 80s.
Dan Ryan 2:43:11 - 2:43:46
Yeah, it was in the high 80s.
Yeah.
So that was startling.
And so I think when I listen to you talk about the safe system pyramid, what are we doing with this information?
What's the action plan to get to the bottom of the fact that of those people who are perishing on our streets, according to the data from the coroner, quite scientific and accurate, it's in the 80% that have methamphetamines in their bloodstream?
That's sad.
Like, what are we doing with that information?
It took me 3 years to even get an answer.
Dana Dickman 2:43:46 - 2:44:42
Right.
As I said earlier, one of the things that we're doing is doing that cross-analysis, digging into some of that data and comparing it to other risk factors, things that we understand from the crash data, and combining it with that information from the medical examiner that the city doesn't typically have access to.
So we are trying to look at those risk factors to determine what some next steps should be.
We're kind of in the middle of it right now, but as I said, we hope to bring a report back this fall where we're going to have some findings and just a deeper understanding of kind of the multiple risk factors.
We know that just exposure is one of the risk factors.
If you are out on the streets 24 hours a day, you have more exposure to traffic and to traffic violence.
So we know that that's part of it.
But this is a deeper dive to understand it in a more complete way, and we'll bring that information back to you.
Dan Ryan 2:44:42 - 2:45:38
Yeah, the impact of our drug crisis is, is very sad, and Portland-McLennan County Behavioral Health has really failed to focus on this.
And I think that I had to daylight it here in this meeting.
I've been very patient and persistent to try to get to the bottom of it because I care.
Right.
And I think that unless we start doing better cross-referencing with public health when it relates to Vision Zero and bringing in more of a, like, SWAT team analysis to really get to the bottom of this, I think we're going to continue to see high numbers.
And we can't mask it with, with other things because that's a significant number and an impact.
And I'll end there, but I wanted to make sure that that was daylighted because I had the privilege of getting that information finally after waiting a few years, and I wanted to make sure other people understood the severity and the challenge we're dealing with here.
Olivia Clark 2:45:39 - 2:45:39
Right.
Dana Dickman 2:45:39 - 2:45:40
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 2:45:40 - 2:45:55
Thanks.
With the permission of those still in the queue, I'd like to continue this on to next week— I'm sorry, next meeting, which is in 2 weeks, to make sure we have the chance to have the presentation on the next item today.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 2:45:55 - 2:46:00
Mayor, I have a very short yes or no question that is kind of timely.
Sameer Kanal 2:46:00 - 2:46:04
Okay, I'll let each of you go through it.
Councilor Koyama Lane, then Morillo, then Pirtle-Guiney.
Tiffany Koyama Lane 2:46:05 - 2:46:35
All right, real quick, piggybacking on Councilor Green's questions and comments about what has come up from advocates with respect to the Burnside repaving project, I'm wondering if there's an opportunity for PBOT to conduct safety analysis— analyses before there are projects that was one question.
And the other one is wanting to hear a little bit more about how Vision Zero and Safe Systems connect specifically to neighborhood greenways and areas near schools.
And I will leave my other questions for now.
Sameer Kanal 2:46:35 - 2:46:37
Thanks.
Councilor Morillo.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 2:46:37 - 2:47:25
Thank you.
I'll be very brief.
For one thing, I don't want to leave us on a note, especially for folks here in the audience, that the people who are getting hit by cars are in any way at fault regardless of whether they have used drugs or not, because it is the vehicle that is killing people, not the person.
And the reality is that a few years ago, houseless advocates didn't advise us on what would happen if we were doing more sweeps, moving people around.
And the reality is that puts people who are unhoused in more danger of being hit by cars because they don't have their regular pathways cleared that they have established and are familiar with.
Secondly, my question actually is about how these budget cuts are going to impact your team, specifically around doing community outreach and engagement for Vision Zero.
And I just wanted to know what council can do to support you moving forward when we get the chance to hear from you again.
Thank you all for being here.
Sameer Kanal 2:47:26 - 2:47:27
Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 2:47:28 - 2:47:53
Thank you, Chair.
Has the Vision Zero team been engaged at all in ensuring that when I-5 is closed later this year and we have people who are used to traveling on a freeway on neighborhood streets, worried about getting to work on time, navigating neighborhoods in North Portland.
Have you been engaged at all on what tools you might be able to help provide to keep our neighbors safe during that period of time?
Dana Dickman 2:47:54 - 2:47:57
I have not, but I believe that PBOT has.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 2:47:57 - 2:48:05
No, PBOT is engaged.
I'm wondering if we're looking to our Vision Zero tools to help, and if not, if we can make good morning.
Dana Dickman 2:48:05 - 2:48:33
Melissa Williams, Director of the Portland Bureau of Transportation.
The PBOT team has established an internal tiger team to address the very things that have been mentioned.
And so one of the folks that is on the list for us to engage is Dana and our Vision Zero team members within the bureau.
So yes, that is going to be happening.
More transparently, um, but it is a priority for us.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 2:48:33 - 2:48:34
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 2:48:35 - 2:49:10
Thank you.
So, uh, we're going to continue this item, uh, to 2 weeks from now.
We will have testimony.
Again, my apologies to those who wanted to testify for us not getting that on the schedule.
Um, as we're cycling out to our next folks, I'll just, uh, put into the ether, um, that I would like a, a data point on not just how many streets are high— are wide but what's the vehicle miles traveled on each?
That weighting, that is the most important way for me to assess.
Um, with that said, we'll continue this on.
Um, if we could get item 4 please called while our Zenith transfer folks come up to present.
Dana Dickman 2:49:11 - 2:49:17
Item 4, consent to franchise transfer from Zenith Energy Terminals Holdings LLC to ISQ Springer Holdings LLC.
Eric Engstrom 2:49:17 - 2:49:18
Amend—.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 2:49:18 - 2:49:24
Uh, excuse me, amend Ordinance 188551.
For document number 2026-263.
Sameer Kanal 2:49:25 - 2:50:16
And I'm sure everyone here has probably deduced by now, we were told that this presentation's about 15 minutes.
So we are going to go up those 15 minutes, hear the presentation, and then there's probably not gonna be time to testify.
I did wanna tell everyone that everyone who is currently registered will receive an updated meeting link the next time that this is called, which will almost certainly be August, uh, 6th.
Yeah, August 6th, the Thursday morning on that date.
Um, and testimony sign-up remains open for this item.
Um, we'll be continuing it at the end of the meeting.
So just wanted to flag all of that, but we will hear the presentation today and then pick up with, uh, clarifying questions and, um, all of that next time.
And with that, sorry, I'm going to introduce, uh, Eric Engstrom, the director of BPS and our franchise utility program manager Andrew Spear.
Thanks for being here.
Eric Engstrom 2:50:17 - 2:59:57
Thank you, councilors.
Again, my— for the record, my name is Eric Kingstrom, Director of Planning and Sustainability.
Andrew Spear, Franchise Utility Manager.
We're here today to talk about the requested transfer of a utility franchise from Zenith Energy to ISQ Springer Holdings.
Andrew's pulling up the presentation as I speak.
I'm going to cover a couple things in my brief presentation.
First, we'll talk about what a franchise is and a little bit of background on the proposal.
We'll secondly just remind you what else is happening in this space surrounding the Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub.
Third, we'll talk about what we're allowed to consider with a transfer of this type.
And then finally, talk about what we found in our research of the material we were given.
Next slide, please.
So just to remind you, a franchise is a contract between the city and another entity, in most cases a utility provider, that allows the entity to install or maintain or operate assets in the city's right-of-way.
And the picture on the right side of the slide here just illustrates the types of things you might see be subject to franchise agreements.
Very often it's pipes and other infrastructure under the street, sometimes wires, sometimes wireless facilities.
Um, a franchisee pays the city, uh, compensation for the access to the right-of-way, and we have 3 different payer types.
Some payers pay per foot, others pay as a percentage of their gross revenues, and others pay per site, for example wireless facilities.
Um, franchise agreements are adopted by council via an ordinance, as are transfers, as we're here to talk about today.
Negotiations of those agreements tend to be multi-year processes.
And just a reminder, the city has moved away from negotiating new franchise agreements and is now operating with a more standardized right-of-way code model that applies a more uniform set of requirements to right-of-way users rather than individually negotiating franchises.
But this— what we're considering today is one of our legacy agreements that predates that new approach.
And our current franchise users will eventually transition to that new system as their agreements expire.
Franchise agreements can vary in length from 5 years to 30 years.
Andrew, correct me if I get this wrong, but I believe this one expires in 2037?
Correct, yes.
Next slide, please.
So this particular franchise is related to a pipe that's operated under Northwest Front Avenue.
The picture on the slide, you can see the area of the Zenith facility, and the area that we've marked in red is the portion of the right-of-way that the pipe in question crosses under.
Zenith pays an annual payment to the city to use the right-of-way.
I believe that's roughly— last year's payment was roughly $48,000 for reference.
The facilities in this case again are pipes that transport next slide.
Franchise agreements generally have a section in them that governs how a franchise can be transferred from one owner to another.
This happens periodically, and I believe it's actually happened before with this particular franchise.
Um, the terms also usually identify the specific review criteria for that transfer.
In this agreement, Section 8 outlines the specific process for a transfer, and it allows the city to review the transfer in terms of technical, legal, and financial capacity of the, of the company requesting to take over the franchise.
These are the lenses that staff are allowed to review the request, and that's what informed our questions that we asked of, of ISQ when, when this application was received.
Next slide.
So I want to just take a quick step back and remind you that there's other work happening related to the, the Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub.
As you're probably all aware, we have some other pending policy proposals coming to council this fall, notably Title 33 and comprehensive plan policy updates to further limit expansion of existing bulk fuel terminals.
And then there's a corresponding Title 17 proposal to require terminals to reduce their storage capacity by 2036 by 20%.
So, um, just want to take note of that other activity.
The next step for those projects is slated for the fall when we intend to bring findings and the proposals to this body, the council, that is.
Um, is there any legal connection between the franchise transfer and that CEI Hub project?
No.
Um, the transfer we're discussing today is a, is a business agreement between a seller and a purchaser where the city can verify that the purchaser has the technical and legal and financial ability to take on those duties.
Um, the CEI Hub projects are code changes, and they don't address these specific facilities in the right-of-way or franchises in general.
Um, so while we have that ongoing work, um, to regulate bulk liquid fuel facilities.
Those are on a separate track from this particular transfer.
And whoever the future owner of the franchise may be, the franchisee will be subject to those future codes at any time that policy might become effective.
And today's decision has no impact on that or the decision you'll eventually make on this action.
Next slide.
So returning to the, the question of this transfer, per Section 8 of the franchise agreement, staff evaluated the information provided by ISQ using the lenses of technical, legal, and financial.
So the technical refers to whether the company has the technical background to safely operate the facility in question.
Next slide.
The legal lens refers to whether the company has a legal understanding and experience with local, state, and federal laws to ensure compliance with those laws as they operate that facility.
Next slide.
The financial lens refers to whether the company has the financial backing to ensure long-term stability of those operations.
Next slide.
I want to, um, just briefly before we talk about the— our findings, I want to just talk a bit about the structure of the company.
This slide depicts the corporate structure of ISQ Springer Holdings, which is owned under another company.
And as you can see on the slide, there's kind of a chain of ownership that goes up to I Squared Capital Advisors.
And this is relevant to some of the analysis we did.
Next slide.
So to— I'll talk about the staff findings regarding the regarding the technical capabilities, we found that the company does own similar facilities in other jurisdictions.
We also— and so we concluded that the company— sorry, and we concluded that the company has a plan to staff the facility with employees who are experts in operating this type of facility and to ensure safe operations.
Next slide.
Regarding the legal expertise, we found that ISQ will retain local counsel and ensure compliance with which has expertise in ensuring compliance with local and state laws.
ISQ also stated that they will be hiring in-house counsel to manage the federal regulatory components of the facility.
Next slide.
To the financial capabilities, as a holding company, ISQ has significant financial backing to ensure long-term stability of operations.
The business structure of the parent company also provides additional stability regarding the payment of franchise fees.
Next slide.
Sorry, I lost my place here.
Under the franchise agreement, the city has certain obligations to how we look at the transfer.
As I mentioned earlier, we're focused on the things I mentioned above, the legal, technical, and financial qualifications.
And any conditions we may attach to that should be tied to those particular issues.
So we must review those criteria stated in the agreement, and the agreement also mentions that we can't unreasonably delay the transfer.
This happens through an ordinance, as I mentioned earlier.
Next slide.
So before I conclude, I just want to remind you what's in scope and out of scope in this decision.
The city can verify and inquire about the qualifications that I mentioned above under Section 8 of the agreement that I talked about, and we can condition the transfer based on those criteria.
Um, we can't otherwise renegotiate the franchise or change the basic terms of the franchise agreement through this action.
And next slide.
I'll just conclude with that based on our review of the criterion in Section 8 of the agreement, again, the technical, legal, and financial, we believe ISQ has sufficient qualifications to operate the facility to the satisfaction of these criterion.
Therefore, staff has recommended that you adopt the ordinance to transfer the agreement from Zenith to ISQ.
And we'll of course remain in the room as you hear testimony to answer Thank you both for being here, and thanks for the presentation.
Sameer Kanal 2:59:58 - 3:00:01
Um, Rebecca, how many people have signed up to testify so far?
Rebecca Dobert 3:00:01 - 3:00:02
53.
Sameer Kanal 3:00:02 - 3:00:14
Okay, so obviously we're not going to get through that today, uh, in a meeting that's scheduled to end in 3 minutes.
Um, does anyone have any, any brief technical questions?
You can also— you'll also have this chance at the next meeting.
Olivia Clark 3:00:15 - 3:00:37
Mr. Chairman, I only only questions that are outside the scope of the franchise agreement, and, um, which legal, technical, financial.
So I would hope that the people who are in line to testify understand, uh, what are— what kind of questions you can actually ask that are inside the scope of the franchise agreement.
Sameer Kanal 3:00:38 - 3:01:00
Yeah, you know, we're going to be posting, um, if we can get your slides as well as a link to the Yeah.
Councilor President?
Jamie Dunphy 3:01:00 - 3:01:20
Yeah, thank you.
I just had a very quick question.
It seems like this is sort of a by-right, almost, uh, an action that, that we have to counsel as a body why is this a legislative action then if it's a— it feels like it's almost an administrative action.
Eric Engstrom 3:01:21 - 3:01:28
I believe it's by charter that franchise agreements and transfers have to be an ordinance.
Jamie Dunphy 3:01:29 - 3:01:49
But just to be clear, I mean, you know, in theory, there are consequences if we as legislators take our legislative power and say yay or nay, we are somehow violating parts of this?
Is that my misunderstanding?
I mean, it seems like we are required to approve this.
Is that wrong?
Eric Engstrom 3:01:49 - 3:01:50
You always have a choice.
Jamie Dunphy 3:01:51 - 3:01:52
Okay.
Eric Engstrom 3:01:52 - 3:01:55
And I would maybe look to the city attorney to elaborate.
Dana Dickman 3:01:55 - 3:01:58
Hi, Nancy Thorington, Deputy City Attorney.
Dan Ryan 3:01:58 - 3:02:00
You're not required to approve it.
Dana Dickman 3:02:00 - 3:02:01
You're required to consider it.
Jamie Dunphy 3:02:02 - 3:02:02
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 3:02:04 - 3:02:15
Thanks.
All right, so we're going to continue this item after Councilor Pirtle-Guiney's question, and then— and actually last after her, and we'll continue it.
But go for it.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 3:02:15 - 3:02:42
I, I just want to dig a little more on the way that you worded that.
We don't have to approve it, we have to consider it.
But I think Council President was getting at an important piece by saying, is this similar to a by-right item?
Maybe it's not precisely that.
Can we amend it, or is this really an up or down vote given the legal limitations in what we look at?
Dana Dickman 3:02:44 - 3:03:17
The legal limitations are you— what you can do is you can, you know, look at the legal, technical, and financial qualifications and if in looking at what's in the record you don't think that that's sufficient, you can condition it.
Um, you know, uh, you don't— or you could find that they don't meet the qualifications, but you would have to have evidence, you know, articulable evidence that they don't meet one of those criteria.
Elana Pirtle-Guiney 3:03:19 - 3:03:19
Thank you.
Sameer Kanal 3:03:22 - 3:04:28
Thank you, Councilor.
Um, so with that, we're going to continue the item to the next meeting, uh, which will be Thursday, August 6th at 9:30, uh, AM.
Colleagues, in about a minute we're going to adjourn.
I just wanted to take a moment to observe and thank you all for bearing with us as we fill up our agendas and see whether or not the requested timelines of items lines up with the allocated time on an agenda, lines up with the the actual time spent.
I think, um, Prosper obviously requires some conversation, as do all of these.
So, um, on an unrelated note, but just since we have the floor, I wanted to take the opportunity to share support, uh, for friends in the Midwest.
We're in the Twin Cities.
People are remembering Speaker of the House Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark Hortman, whose murderer was sentenced in court, uh, today.
And to the people in Madison, Wisconsin, we're on the same street where police killed Tony Robinson in 2015.
Uh, Corey Ruiz was killed by police yesterday.
Uh, my thoughts are with everyone affected by gun violence regardless of who caused it, and I appreciate the opportunity to take a few seconds today.
Our next meeting is Thursday, August 6th at 9:30 AM.
It is 12:31 PM, and this meeting of the Committee of the Whole is adjourned.
Thank you.
