WEBVTT

1
00:06:47.588 --> 00:06:49.437
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Good afternoon.

2
00:06:49.617 --> 00:06:52.538
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It is It is 2:02 on Tuesday, October 27th.

3
00:06:52.653 --> 00:06:56.281
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I am calling to order this meeting of the City Life Committee.

4
00:06:57.230 --> 00:06:58.595
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Keelan, could you please call the roll?

5
00:06:58.805 --> 00:06:59.536
<v Keelan McClymont>Good afternoon.

6
00:06:59.617 --> 00:07:01.779
<v Keelan McClymont>Zimmerman?

7
00:07:01.892 --> 00:07:02.966
<v Eric Zimmerman>Here.

8
00:07:03.730 --> 00:07:04.295
<v Keelan McClymont>Avalos?

9
00:07:05.379 --> 00:07:06.608
<v Candace Avalos>Present.

10
00:07:07.723 --> 00:07:09.875
<v Keelan McClymont>Ryan?

11
00:07:10.230 --> 00:07:10.846
<v Keelan McClymont>Morillo?

12
00:07:11.767 --> 00:07:12.026
<v Angelita Morillo>Here.

13
00:07:13.029 --> 00:07:13.358
<v Keelan McClymont>Pirtle-Guiney?

14
00:07:13.637 --> 00:07:13.819
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Here.

15
00:07:16.192 --> 00:07:18.569
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Kevin, could you please read our rules of order?

16
00:07:19.550 --> 00:07:21.622
<v Keelan McClymont>Welcome to the meeting of the City Life Committee.

17
00:07:21.879 --> 00:07:34.939
<v Keelan McClymont>To testify before this committee in person or virtually, you must sign up in advance on the committee agenda at www.portland.gov/council/agenda/city-life-committee or by calling 311.

18
00:07:35.293 --> 00:07:37.956
<v Keelan McClymont>Information on engaging with the committee can be found at this link.

19
00:07:38.423 --> 00:07:41.956
<v Keelan McClymont>Registration for virtual testimony closes 1 hour prior to the meeting.

20
00:07:42.252 --> 00:07:45.189
<v Keelan McClymont>In-person testifiers must sign up before the agenda item is heard.

21
00:07:45.720 --> 00:07:51.613
<v Keelan McClymont>If public testimony will be taken on an item, individuals may testify for 3 minutes unless the chair states otherwise.

22
00:07:52.031 --> 00:07:53.925
<v Keelan McClymont>Your microphone will be muted when your time is over.

23
00:07:54.456 --> 00:07:55.660
<v Keelan McClymont>The chair preserves order.

24
00:07:55.821 --> 00:08:04.139
<v Keelan McClymont>Disruptive conduct such as shouting, refusing to conclude your testimony when your time is up, or interrupting others' testimony or committee deliberations will not be allowed.

25
00:08:04.653 --> 00:08:06.660
<v Keelan McClymont>If you cause a disruption, a warning will be given.

26
00:08:07.045 --> 00:08:09.567
<v Keelan McClymont>Further disruption will result in ejection from the meeting.

27
00:08:09.935 --> 00:08:13.110
<v Keelan McClymont>Anyone who fails to leave once ejected is subject to arrest for trespass.

28
00:08:13.574 --> 00:08:17.245
<v Keelan McClymont>Additionally, the committee may take a short recess and reconvene virtually.

29
00:08:17.709 --> 00:08:19.778
<v Keelan McClymont>Your testimony should address the matter being considered.

30
00:08:20.130 --> 00:08:22.182
<v Keelan McClymont>When testifying, state your name for the record.

31
00:08:22.615 --> 00:08:25.341
<v Keelan McClymont>If you are a lobbyist, identify the organization you represent.

32
00:08:25.742 --> 00:08:28.834
<v Keelan McClymont>Virtual testifiers should unmute themselves when the clerk calls your name.

33
00:08:29.108 --> 00:08:29.411
<v Keelan McClymont>Thank you.

34
00:08:30.855 --> 00:08:32.009
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you very much, colleagues.

35
00:08:32.072 --> 00:08:37.620
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>The first item on our agenda today is approval of our meeting minutes for our 2 September meetings.

36
00:08:37.668 --> 00:08:39.655
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm sure everybody has read them thoroughly.

37
00:08:39.751 --> 00:08:41.547
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Do I have unanimous consent to adopt the minutes?

38
00:08:43.774 --> 00:08:48.951
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Not seeing any objections, we will adopt the minutes for our 2 September meetings.

39
00:08:50.090 --> 00:08:52.110
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Keelan, could you please call the next item on our agenda?

40
00:08:52.991 --> 00:08:59.484
<v Keelan McClymont>Item 2, document 2026-383, public input on City Life Committee topics.

41
00:09:00.669 --> 00:09:01.182
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

42
00:09:01.392 --> 00:09:16.576
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And for folks who are listening in for the first time, every week we make sure to have time for people to talk about items that fall within the jurisdiction of the City Life Committee but that are not on our agenda, and I believe we have a few people signed up today.

43
00:09:16.655 --> 00:09:18.479
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Keelan, could you please call up our first testifier?

44
00:09:21.128 --> 00:09:25.761
<v Keelan McClymont>Uh, first up today we have Galib Bin Imhotep El.

45
00:09:28.297 --> 00:09:28.652
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Welcome.

46
00:09:28.764 --> 00:09:29.620
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you for joining us.

47
00:09:37.351 --> 00:09:39.028
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>Greetings, committee members.

48
00:09:39.365 --> 00:09:51.243
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>Um, usually I have a speech or something to say about city life that's more pertinent or civilly, you know, progressive.

49
00:09:52.640 --> 00:10:02.826
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>But today I'm just going to talk about something that happened here over the past week and a half that I think solidified my position in this city as far as whether I'm going or staying.

50
00:10:04.351 --> 00:10:11.754
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>About, I want to say, 4, maybe 5 years ago, I can't remember exactly how long, but LeBron James somehow slipped up and became a Los Angeles Laker.

51
00:10:13.120 --> 00:10:14.325
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I stopped watching basketball.

52
00:10:15.626 --> 00:10:26.440
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I could not bear to know that my team from birth decided to pick up a guy who I just can't look at as far as great basketball players.

53
00:10:26.615 --> 00:10:27.515
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I just don't see it in him.

54
00:10:28.384 --> 00:10:30.327
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>Great athlete, not great basketball player.

55
00:10:30.874 --> 00:10:35.100
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>Anyway, he left the Lakers and I said, great, now I can watch basketball.

56
00:10:35.533 --> 00:10:38.104
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>Then lo and behold, he left something behind.

57
00:10:38.152 --> 00:10:38.216
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>What?

58
00:10:40.032 --> 00:10:41.702
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>His son, Bronny.

59
00:10:42.764 --> 00:10:44.434
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I can't be a Laker fan, I'm sorry.

60
00:10:45.110 --> 00:10:55.520
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>So I made a switch, and what better switch to make than a team that I've always kind of enjoyed watching play basketball, a very gritty team, Portland Trail Blazers.

61
00:10:55.649 --> 00:10:56.918
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I'm in the city, why not?

62
00:10:58.043 --> 00:11:01.595
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>So, um, the first game of the season happens.

63
00:11:05.596 --> 00:11:08.032
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I get to see 21 points scored.

64
00:11:10.039 --> 00:11:17.868
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>Ja Morant and Damian Lillard get hot and get on fire before anything else happens in the NBA.

65
00:11:18.807 --> 00:11:21.004
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>What a welcome as a fan.

66
00:11:23.342 --> 00:11:27.735
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I'd like to go on public record to tell the Portland Trail Blazers, thank you for such a great welcome package.

67
00:11:27.927 --> 00:11:34.086
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>The best opening game in the history of the Portland Trail Blazers was this season's opening game.

68
00:11:34.136 --> 00:11:34.254
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>Thank you.

69
00:11:34.894 --> 00:11:37.004
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>They won by, I think it was 42 points.

70
00:11:37.778 --> 00:11:38.679
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>It was outlandish.

71
00:11:38.825 --> 00:11:45.657
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I, I watched it from probably the 5th minute of the first quarter to the end, and I smiled the entire time.

72
00:11:46.111 --> 00:11:46.924
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>They never let up.

73
00:11:47.655 --> 00:11:50.288
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>They look like they're going to do great things this year.

74
00:11:51.897 --> 00:11:56.730
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I can easily see in 5 years a team of this nature making it a long way.

75
00:11:58.422 --> 00:12:03.530
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>Hopefully they make it another 2 decades and 5 years in this same city.

76
00:12:05.041 --> 00:12:12.703
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>I just wanted to let you guys know that I love the Portland Trail Blazers, I love the city of Portland, and I love you all unconditionally.

77
00:12:13.009 --> 00:12:13.865
<v Galib Bin Imhotep El>Thank you.

78
00:12:14.947 --> 00:12:19.418
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you for being here and for the recounting of that fantastic game.

79
00:12:21.384 --> 00:12:24.106
<v Keelan McClymont>Next up, we have Anita Davidson joining us online.

80
00:12:25.653 --> 00:12:26.571
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Welcome, Ms. Davidson.

81
00:12:26.700 --> 00:12:27.424
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you for being here.

82
00:12:28.432 --> 00:12:28.928
<v Anita Davidson>Thank you.

83
00:12:29.474 --> 00:12:33.511
<v Anita Davidson>Yes, my name is Anita Davidson, and I own a condominium downtown in District 4.

84
00:12:34.201 --> 00:12:39.618
<v Anita Davidson>I'm here to give you a ratepayer's report card on Clean and Safe and to introduce a couple of new concerns.

85
00:12:40.291 --> 00:12:52.903
<v Anita Davidson>Unfortunately, from our perspective, and I speak for more than myself, almost nothing has improved since the city auditor reported recommendations in late 2020, and the consultant hired by the city echoed those in 2024.

86
00:12:53.672 --> 00:12:55.322
<v Anita Davidson>The first category was governance.

87
00:12:55.754 --> 00:12:59.489
<v Anita Davidson>The ESDs were to become more representative, transparent, and accountable.

88
00:13:00.403 --> 00:13:07.085
<v Anita Davidson>Ratepayer representation at Clean and Safe has not increased, however, and directors are still bound by nondisclosure agreements.

89
00:13:07.630 --> 00:13:13.716
<v Anita Davidson>Ratepayers still have no access to meetings, minutes, budgets, agendas, resolutions, or reports.

90
00:13:14.456 --> 00:13:17.587
<v Anita Davidson>The program measures Clean and Safe reports also need updating.

91
00:13:18.937 --> 00:13:21.201
<v Anita Davidson>The second recommendation had to do with oversight.

92
00:13:21.346 --> 00:13:26.548
<v Anita Davidson>The city established an ESD coordinator position, and the job has become one of liaison and advocacy.

93
00:13:26.741 --> 00:13:27.751
<v Anita Davidson>That has its purpose.

94
00:13:28.345 --> 00:13:31.086
<v Anita Davidson>Unfortunately, those are incompatible with oversight.

95
00:13:31.873 --> 00:13:34.886
<v Anita Davidson>A good cop, bad cop can rarely be done by one person.

96
00:13:35.640 --> 00:13:46.513
<v Anita Davidson>The 3rd recommendation had to do with creating guidelines, which was done in 2024 in a draft ESD handbook and draft ESD petition packet when Clean and Safe lobbied for expansion.

97
00:13:47.892 --> 00:13:56.297
<v Anita Davidson>However, the documents were flawed, were public— never publicly vetted, never run through City Council for approval, or approved as administrative rules.

98
00:13:56.907 --> 00:14:02.397
<v Anita Davidson>Essentially, the ESDs are running on procedures created by the ESD coordinator, and they remain flawed.

99
00:14:02.975 --> 00:14:11.980
<v Anita Davidson>In 2024, we raised multiple issues about those specifically related to insufficient notification and lack of criteria for the repair support required.

100
00:14:12.623 --> 00:14:18.048
<v Anita Davidson>The guidelines were rolled out anyway, and, and then the flaws have been caught by these new neighborhoods now considering ESDs.

101
00:14:18.802 --> 00:14:29.110
<v Anita Davidson>This committee itself has before it the tabled ordinance for— proposed ordinance for Parkrose with similar objections, and St. Johns and Pearl neighborhoods have withdrawn.

102
00:14:30.024 --> 00:14:34.991
<v Anita Davidson>So I consider this, this area of guidelines also to be a failure so far.

103
00:14:35.873 --> 00:14:40.119
<v Anita Davidson>But now I have my 2 new concerns because I've done additional research since.

104
00:14:40.504 --> 00:14:45.855
<v Anita Davidson>Actually, the days of enhanced services are gone, and I'd like the City Life Committee to consider this.

105
00:14:46.351 --> 00:14:57.719
<v Anita Davidson>Everything Clean and Safe does offers is now a basic service funded and provided more efficiently and more cost-effectively by our government than through Clean and Safe with its 20% overhead.

106
00:14:58.296 --> 00:15:16.767
<v Anita Davidson>The city's realized that— realized this, that we need this for revitalization, and now provides its own sidewalk cleaning, graffiti removal, extra security, extra lighting, year-round holiday lighting, PBOT pays TriMet to clean and secure the transit mall.

107
00:15:17.297 --> 00:15:24.880
<v Anita Davidson>The state has paid Clean and Safe to provide extra security downtown, and parks now are using Clean and Safe to run the extra parks.

108
00:15:25.346 --> 00:15:30.456
<v Anita Davidson>But why are we ratepayers required to pay for these as enhanced services?

109
00:15:31.355 --> 00:15:37.413
<v Anita Davidson>Finally, I'd just like to say that there is a better picture, a better model, and that is in Seattle.

110
00:15:37.557 --> 00:15:40.578
<v Anita Davidson>The links and so forth are in my written testimony.

111
00:15:41.092 --> 00:15:42.860
<v Anita Davidson>Thank you for the opportunity to speak today.

112
00:15:42.908 --> 00:15:43.068
<v Anita Davidson>Thank you.

113
00:15:43.663 --> 00:15:46.044
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you so much for raising these concerns.

114
00:15:46.721 --> 00:15:47.331
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We appreciate it.

115
00:15:48.409 --> 00:15:49.986
<v Keelan McClymont>Next up, we have Alex Stein.

116
00:15:52.543 --> 00:15:52.880
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Welcome.

117
00:15:52.946 --> 00:15:53.974
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you for being here with us.

118
00:15:54.150 --> 00:15:56.080
<v Alex Stein>Yo, yo, thank you for having me.

119
00:15:56.159 --> 00:15:57.702
<v Alex Stein>Yo, my name is Alex Stein.

120
00:15:57.750 --> 00:15:59.214
<v Alex Stein>I came from Texas.

121
00:15:59.293 --> 00:16:10.051
<v Alex Stein>I was here, uh, for a rehabilitation stint, and I'll be honest with you, Portland's got the cleanest and the best fentanyl In the world.

122
00:16:10.226 --> 00:16:14.730
<v Alex Stein>And I know a lot of other people, a lot of other cities, they say, oh, our fennel's the best in Vegas.

123
00:16:15.114 --> 00:16:16.172
<v Alex Stein>It's not as good.

124
00:16:16.412 --> 00:16:17.933
<v Alex Stein>And that's why I love Portland.

125
00:16:18.062 --> 00:16:19.600
<v Alex Stein>That's why I'm never leaving Portland.

126
00:16:20.000 --> 00:16:27.323
<v Alex Stein>And my great-great-great-grandmother was a slave, and my great-great-great-grandfather was a plantation owner.

127
00:16:27.388 --> 00:16:32.082
<v Alex Stein>So I'm 1/32nd Black, and I see a room full of whites.

128
00:16:32.434 --> 00:16:34.052
<v Alex Stein>I see like one other Black dude.

129
00:16:34.116 --> 00:16:35.335
<v Alex Stein>He's talking about LeBron James.

130
00:16:35.383 --> 00:16:36.793
<v Alex Stein>And I was like, that's what I'm talking about.

131
00:16:37.226 --> 00:16:40.350
<v Alex Stein>But LeBron James is not on fentanyl.

132
00:16:40.462 --> 00:16:46.918
<v Alex Stein>And so what I'm saying, if you thinking about coming to Portland, if you thinking about it, you need to get up on here.

133
00:16:47.081 --> 00:16:53.057
<v Alex Stein>So I made y'all a little song about how much and how clean the fentanyl is up in this.

134
00:16:53.265 --> 00:16:53.684
<v Alex Stein>All right?

135
00:16:53.764 --> 00:16:57.610
<v Alex Stein>So this is for all, all the people curious, all the addicts out there.

136
00:16:57.691 --> 00:16:58.030
<v Alex Stein>Yo.

137
00:16:59.568 --> 00:17:02.176
<v Alex Stein>Yo, I love that fentanyl.

138
00:17:02.726 --> 00:17:05.371
<v Alex Stein>I stick that needle in my vein.

139
00:17:05.666 --> 00:17:17.763
<v Alex Stein>I mix the fentanyl with a little cocaine, Portland, this city is insane, 'cause I'm freaking, I'm freaking.

140
00:17:17.958 --> 00:17:22.982
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think that we're gonna need to, uh, we need you in the chair, or—.

141
00:17:23.819 --> 00:17:25.736
<v Alex Stein>What am I doing wrong?

142
00:17:26.234 --> 00:17:27.798
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We're happy to hear from you.

143
00:17:27.864 --> 00:17:28.644
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>What am I doing wrong?

144
00:17:29.085 --> 00:17:30.615
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We're happy to hear from you, but—.

145
00:17:30.615 --> 00:17:32.470
<v Alex Stein>I'll leave, but just tell me why I'm leaving.

146
00:17:32.828 --> 00:17:33.122
<v Alex Stein>I never—.

147
00:17:33.153 --> 00:17:33.251
<v Alex Stein>Why?

148
00:17:34.655 --> 00:17:37.236
<v Alex Stein>Wait, wait, wait, wait, I have my First Amendment right to speak.

149
00:17:37.316 --> 00:17:40.488
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you very much for being here with us today.

150
00:17:40.568 --> 00:17:41.849
<v Alex Stein>Y'all got the cleanest fentanyl.

151
00:17:42.426 --> 00:17:43.613
<v Alex Stein>Y'all got the cleanest fentanyl.

152
00:17:43.805 --> 00:17:45.375
<v Alex Stein>It's causing illegitimate crap lives.

153
00:17:45.951 --> 00:18:01.366
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I will just add to that in the time that's left that, uh, we are not suggesting folks come here to use illegal drugs, um, but we do provide opportunity for anybody who wants to to sign up and speak.

154
00:18:05.087 --> 00:18:06.957
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Keelan, do we have anybody else signed up today?

155
00:18:07.135 --> 00:18:09.020
<v Keelan McClymont>That completes testimony for this item.

156
00:18:09.086 --> 00:18:10.174
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Hey, well, there we go.

157
00:18:12.836 --> 00:18:15.519
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, Keelan, could you please read the next thing on our agenda?

158
00:18:17.236 --> 00:18:35.663
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Uh, item 3, document 2026-371, declare 2 parcels of land as surplus property and authorize the Bureau of Transportation to dispose of the property for Thank you both for being here.

159
00:18:35.727 --> 00:18:50.961
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, I'll remind you that at our last meeting, we had a conversation about broadly when and why pieces of property are sold, when the city decides that we don't want to hold on to any property any longer.

160
00:18:51.041 --> 00:18:54.808
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So this is the, the next piece coming forward for us to consider.

161
00:18:54.905 --> 00:18:55.278
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dan Ryan.

162
00:18:55.392 --> 00:18:56.134
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Madam Chair.

163
00:18:59.584 --> 00:18:59.844
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

164
00:18:59.893 --> 00:19:04.176
<v David McEldowney>I'm going to have a hard time topping that last act.

165
00:19:06.059 --> 00:19:13.821
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>As long as you don't start dancing on the table there, we are fine with you continuing with content related to council.

166
00:19:13.919 --> 00:19:14.566
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We just—.

167
00:19:14.566 --> 00:19:15.865
<v David McEldowney>Thank you so much.

168
00:19:16.019 --> 00:19:16.820
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Don't dance on the table.

169
00:19:18.238 --> 00:19:19.682
<v David McEldowney>I am David McEldowney.

170
00:19:19.877 --> 00:19:23.092
<v David McEldowney>I'm the real— well, I should say good morning, councilors.

171
00:19:23.287 --> 00:19:23.661
<v David McEldowney>I'm David McEldowney.

172
00:19:24.406 --> 00:19:26.192
<v David McEldowney>I'm the Real Property Services Division Manager for Piedmont-Wilshire.

173
00:19:28.356 --> 00:19:32.605
<v David McEldowney>I'm joined by Kevin Balak, who is supervisor in our property management section.

174
00:19:34.116 --> 00:19:36.236
<v David McEldowney>And we've got the presentation up.

175
00:19:36.316 --> 00:19:36.575
<v David McEldowney>Great.

176
00:19:38.257 --> 00:19:49.574
<v David McEldowney>Yes, as you mentioned, we were here 2 weeks ago to talk about a broader conversation on the city's surplus property process, and these properties will look familiar.

177
00:19:50.586 --> 00:19:51.181
<v David McEldowney>Kevin, go ahead.

178
00:19:52.945 --> 00:20:05.980
<v David McEldowney>As a reminder, these these properties or these parcels are located at the east end of the Foster-Woodstock couplet, which is about 2 blocks east of I-205 in District 1.

179
00:20:06.878 --> 00:20:13.275
<v David McEldowney>And the parcels themselves are remnants left over from the construction of that project.

180
00:20:14.092 --> 00:20:18.676
<v David McEldowney>And combined, they total about 3,500 square feet.

181
00:20:19.398 --> 00:20:36.135
<v David McEldowney>They are zoned are considered a standalone building site, meaning that, you know, they're capable of housing and without being assembled to another property.

182
00:20:37.890 --> 00:20:39.611
<v David McEldowney>Kevin, you want to go to the next slide?

183
00:20:40.967 --> 00:20:41.795
<v David McEldowney>Some key points.

184
00:20:42.104 --> 00:20:46.146
<v David McEldowney>This is what we talked about 2 weeks ago about a Category 3 property.

185
00:20:47.137 --> 00:20:54.823
<v David McEldowney>So the Category 3 properties are the the highest level or most scrutiny is received by the review by the bureaus.

186
00:20:56.395 --> 00:21:06.893
<v David McEldowney>During that review, PBOT determined that we needed to review or retain 3 feet or a strip of property along Woodstock for future widening of the sidewalk there.

187
00:21:08.086 --> 00:21:12.968
<v David McEldowney>No other city bureaus nor outside agencies expressed any interest in these parcels.

188
00:21:14.721 --> 00:21:19.835
<v David McEldowney>As a Category 3, that also receives a public comment period.

189
00:21:20.238 --> 00:21:36.440
<v David McEldowney>During the public comment period, we did receive comments along the lines of, you know, yes, please develop that property, take care of this property, and folks who were just interested in buying it to develop it because they saw the signs that were posted out there.

190
00:21:37.059 --> 00:21:40.823
<v David McEldowney>Signs were also— or the information was also posted on the city's website.

191
00:21:42.842 --> 00:21:47.928
<v David McEldowney>As a reminder too, There's holding costs to this property.

192
00:21:49.228 --> 00:21:57.288
<v David McEldowney>Last year, the Impact Reduction Program manager reported that there were more than 300 campsite complaints here.

193
00:21:58.718 --> 00:22:10.904
<v David McEldowney>There were 60 risk assessments made by the city's contractor, resulting in 24 camp removals that totaled $45,000, or that was the estimate for last year.

194
00:22:11.926 --> 00:22:14.798
<v David McEldowney>And with that, I will conclude our presentation.

195
00:22:14.846 --> 00:22:17.003
<v David McEldowney>Happy to answer any questions that you may have.

196
00:22:18.575 --> 00:22:18.867
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

197
00:22:18.949 --> 00:22:20.299
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, questions?

198
00:22:25.963 --> 00:22:27.193
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Morillo, go right ahead.

199
00:22:28.750 --> 00:22:29.914
<v Angelita Morillo>Yeah, thank you so much for this presentation.

200
00:22:31.872 --> 00:22:39.189
<v Angelita Morillo>I was wondering if PHB considered this land for land banking in making this decision, or if it was, you know, not chosen for that for a certain reason.

201
00:22:39.915 --> 00:22:43.104
<v David McEldowney>Yes, they are definitely part of that process.

202
00:22:43.200 --> 00:22:44.529
<v David McEldowney>We always reach out to them.

203
00:22:45.058 --> 00:22:50.473
<v David McEldowney>The response back we receive from PHB is they're not really interested in onesies, twosies.

204
00:22:51.211 --> 00:22:53.837
<v David McEldowney>They need the economy of scale of larger land.

205
00:22:54.111 --> 00:23:00.406
<v David McEldowney>And so tomorrow you'll— the full council will hear about the ODOT trade we're doing.

206
00:23:00.519 --> 00:23:03.275
<v David McEldowney>Those larger parcels, that's what they're interested in.

207
00:23:03.563 --> 00:23:09.843
<v David McEldowney>It just doesn't pencil out trying to get the private capital for smaller parcels like this.

208
00:23:10.761 --> 00:23:11.068
<v Angelita Morillo>Gotcha.

209
00:23:11.230 --> 00:23:12.541
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay, that makes a lot of sense.

210
00:23:12.606 --> 00:23:16.460
<v Angelita Morillo>And so I take it no one has been considering this specific land 'cause it's just too small?

211
00:23:17.317 --> 00:23:17.932
<v David McEldowney>Correct, yeah.

212
00:23:18.046 --> 00:23:18.613
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay, great.

213
00:23:18.692 --> 00:23:19.049
<v Angelita Morillo>Thanks so much.

214
00:23:21.339 --> 00:23:22.103
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

215
00:23:23.077 --> 00:23:24.751
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Question along a similar line.

216
00:23:26.359 --> 00:23:41.579
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Have we— I know there was some, when you gave the presentation 2 weeks ago, there were some properties that were specifically offered to certain types of housing development from PHB, if I remember correctly.

217
00:23:43.855 --> 00:24:03.923
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Do we have a process whereby with a piece of land like this that is available for development for residential units, we check in with entities that develop the onesies-twosies for affordable housing to see if any of our providers of affordable housing opportunities were interested before we make it available on the open market?

218
00:24:05.906 --> 00:24:06.902
<v David McEldowney>Not that I'm aware of.

219
00:24:07.094 --> 00:24:13.673
<v David McEldowney>I'm not sure what PHB's process is when they get notified of these parcels, if they do something similar to that.

220
00:24:14.395 --> 00:24:22.050
<v David McEldowney>Um, typically what would happen is if council, the full council approved this as surplus, we would put it out on the open market.

221
00:24:22.115 --> 00:24:30.636
<v David McEldowney>If somebody was interested in that, they would have the same priority as any other purchaser, but I'm not aware of a specific process for that.

222
00:24:31.815 --> 00:24:42.907
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, I'd like to learn more about whether there is a process that we could be using there, and if we don't have something developed, whether we might consider developing something.

223
00:24:43.747 --> 00:25:17.009
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have a number of entities in the city who are trying to develop affordable homeownership opportunities through land banking outside of the city, and I, I recognize that perhaps the economies of scale are not there for land banking and development by the city, but we do have partners that do that work outside of the city, and it— I think we should consider, if affordable homeownership opportunities are a priority, a parcel like this for, for those partners.

224
00:25:17.749 --> 00:25:20.894
<v David McEldowney>I would be happy to connect with PHB following this meeting.

225
00:25:21.441 --> 00:25:22.517
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, I'd appreciate that.

226
00:25:23.528 --> 00:25:25.535
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, any other questions or comments?

227
00:25:26.900 --> 00:25:32.198
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, um, if the committee is interested in moving this forward to full council—.

228
00:25:32.198 --> 00:25:32.743
<v Keelan McClymont>Sorry, sorry.

229
00:25:32.856 --> 00:25:33.788
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Oh, do we have testimony?

230
00:25:34.045 --> 00:25:34.286
<v Keelan McClymont>We do.

231
00:25:34.461 --> 00:25:37.271
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I am sorry, I didn't think we had anybody signed up.

232
00:25:37.432 --> 00:25:38.444
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I apologize.

233
00:25:38.701 --> 00:25:40.259
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Uh, let's move to public testimony.

234
00:25:40.708 --> 00:25:41.142
<v Keelan McClymont>Great, thanks.

235
00:25:41.205 --> 00:25:43.260
<v Keelan McClymont>We have one person signed up, John Carmen.

236
00:26:01.791 --> 00:26:02.422
<v Keelan McClymont>John Carmen.

237
00:26:05.040 --> 00:26:06.496
<v Keelan McClymont>Okay, that completes testimony.

238
00:26:07.146 --> 00:26:15.473
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, um, is there a motion to move this to full council?

239
00:26:15.749 --> 00:26:16.184
<v Dan Ryan>So moved.

240
00:26:16.476 --> 00:26:18.141
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I assume that's with a do pass recommendation?

241
00:26:18.767 --> 00:26:18.943
<v Dan Ryan>Yes.

242
00:26:19.267 --> 00:26:20.557
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, is there a second?

243
00:26:21.025 --> 00:26:21.943
<v Eric Zimmerman>Yes, second.

244
00:26:22.250 --> 00:26:25.346
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, moved by Ryan, seconded by Zimmerman.

245
00:26:26.589 --> 00:26:28.134
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Uh, Keelan, could you please call the vote?

246
00:26:31.614 --> 00:26:32.000
<v Keelan McClymont>Zimmerman?

247
00:26:32.259 --> 00:26:32.275
<v Eric Zimmerman>Aye.

248
00:26:32.532 --> 00:26:34.176
<v Keelan McClymont>Avalos?

249
00:26:37.256 --> 00:26:37.271
<v Candace Avalos>Aye.

250
00:26:38.642 --> 00:26:38.853
<v Keelan McClymont>Ryan?

251
00:26:39.598 --> 00:26:39.760
<v Dan Ryan>Aye.

252
00:26:41.869 --> 00:26:42.681
<v Keelan McClymont>Thank you, Councilor.

253
00:26:42.924 --> 00:26:43.265
<v Keelan McClymont>Murillo?

254
00:26:44.221 --> 00:26:44.270
<v Angelita Morillo>Aye.

255
00:26:50.337 --> 00:26:50.354
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Aye.

256
00:26:50.644 --> 00:26:53.230
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I'll appreciate getting that additional information before full council.

257
00:26:54.483 --> 00:27:02.398
<v Keelan McClymont>A motion to refer the ordinance document number 2026-371 to City Council with the recommendation it be passed is approved.

258
00:27:02.721 --> 00:27:03.769
<v David McEldowney>Thank you.

259
00:27:05.348 --> 00:27:05.654
<v David McEldowney>Thank you.

260
00:27:09.861 --> 00:27:17.588
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, the final item on our agenda is a presentation By the— by our BPS staff.

261
00:27:17.733 --> 00:27:22.125
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And we were going to take a break first, but we've moved pretty quickly.

262
00:27:22.318 --> 00:27:28.123
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So if you are ready, Andrew, we can start now.

263
00:27:28.394 --> 00:27:31.713
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And then if we get a significant number of questions, we'll take a break.

264
00:27:31.842 --> 00:27:33.221
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And if not, we'll move through.

265
00:27:33.540 --> 00:27:34.278
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Does that sound all right?

266
00:27:34.487 --> 00:27:35.144
<v Andrew Speer>That's great.

267
00:27:35.305 --> 00:27:35.560
<v Andrew Speer>Thank you.

268
00:27:35.642 --> 00:27:36.971
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, perfect.

269
00:27:37.854 --> 00:28:02.404
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And colleagues, by way of background here, in the spring, we were given a fair amount of information about our cable regulatory environment, leading to some budget decisions around moving to regulating our cable industry ourselves as a city, as opposed to through a joint body with our neighboring cities.

270
00:28:03.144 --> 00:28:13.086
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And we heard about the financial unsustainability of the programs that are currently funded through Um, our cable regulation sources.

271
00:28:13.856 --> 00:28:40.607
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I had said at the time that it seemed to me that there was a need for a broader conversation about what the timeline looked like before we completely run out of funding to support the organizations that are currently supported through this funding stream, and also what the timeline looks like as more and more people within our community leave cable and receive their news and entertainment through other sources.

272
00:28:41.521 --> 00:28:47.020
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>There's also a piece of this around who we regulate and how we are able to regulate them.

273
00:28:47.838 --> 00:28:55.951
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And so we are bringing back a presentation today— thank you, Mr. Speier— to delve into some of those broader topics.

274
00:28:56.416 --> 00:29:05.219
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>There is no imminent action coming for this council to take, but we wanted to make sure you had this background following the conversations we had in the spring.

275
00:29:05.282 --> 00:29:05.378
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

276
00:29:05.731 --> 00:29:17.354
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Because there will be over the next few years actions that council can or eventually will have to take based on the direction that you'll see us heading in the charts that we have before us today.

277
00:29:18.715 --> 00:29:18.893
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Great.

278
00:29:19.919 --> 00:29:20.511
<v Andrew Speer>Thank you, Chair.

279
00:29:20.881 --> 00:29:22.002
<v Andrew Speer>Good afternoon, council.

280
00:29:22.548 --> 00:29:27.325
<v Andrew Speer>My name is Andrew Spear, and I'm the Franchise Utility Program Manager here at the city within BPS.

281
00:29:28.077 --> 00:29:39.914
<v Andrew Speer>I'll be walking through some data and a little bit of background and also some structural information on how we administer access to right-of-way.

282
00:29:39.980 --> 00:29:42.309
<v Andrew Speer>This is just an overview of the items we'll cover.

283
00:29:42.390 --> 00:29:54.390
<v Andrew Speer>But again, we're wanting to key you in on how do we allow access to the right-of-way as a starting point, just regardless of who the actor is in the right— that has assets in the right-of-way.

284
00:29:54.875 --> 00:30:03.968
<v Andrew Speer>And then go into a little bit of detail on what is cable-specific and how that impacts our ability as a jurisdiction to regulate that entity.

285
00:30:04.548 --> 00:30:14.538
<v Andrew Speer>And then there's some other nuance related to cable around certain fees that we assess cable providers that are unique from other providers in the right-of-way.

286
00:30:15.121 --> 00:30:23.377
<v Andrew Speer>And then lastly, got— I have a little bit of questions I think to pose or just engage in conversation with you all on, on what does the future look like.

287
00:30:25.796 --> 00:30:27.439
<v Andrew Speer>Uh, first up is the right-of-way access.

288
00:30:27.502 --> 00:30:30.757
<v Andrew Speer>So how do we administer access to the right-of-way?

289
00:30:31.352 --> 00:30:45.384
<v Andrew Speer>Uh, when I joined the city in 2023, we were working on an effort to replace franchise agreements and instead go to a code-based system, and so that we'd avoid the need to negotiate franchise agreements into the future.

290
00:30:45.689 --> 00:30:53.463
<v Andrew Speer>We still have franchise agreements that are— our last one expires in 2037, with the exception of Comcast.

291
00:30:54.122 --> 00:31:01.880
<v Andrew Speer>But as those franchise agreements expire, they'll be coming onto the right-of-way code, which is Chapter 12.15.

292
00:31:01.992 --> 00:31:07.180
<v Andrew Speer>And then on the right-hand side of the slide here, you have the different yes.

293
00:31:07.180 --> 00:31:11.220
<v Andrew Speer>So those are the entities that are registered either under right-of-way code or have a franchise agreement.

294
00:31:11.859 --> 00:31:23.470
<v Andrew Speer>Just for reference point, the core utilities listed there— PGE, Pacific Power, and Northwest Natural— they make up about 60% of the fees we recover from access to the right-of-way.

295
00:31:26.380 --> 00:31:33.720
<v Andrew Speer>I wanted to demonstrate a little bit of what the benefits have been and were when we were proposing right-of-way code.

296
00:31:33.720 --> 00:31:36.759
<v Andrew Speer>Namely, we don't have to negotiate franchise agreements.

297
00:31:36.759 --> 00:31:36.859
<v Andrew Speer>Franchise agreements are one-to-one contracts.

298
00:31:38.680 --> 00:31:41.616
<v Andrew Speer>Contracts between an entity and the jurisdiction.

299
00:31:41.681 --> 00:31:46.930
<v Andrew Speer>And so they can include a lot of different provisions that may not relate to the right-of-way.

300
00:31:47.363 --> 00:31:55.823
<v Andrew Speer>And so they can be one-off things that are just items that need to be negotiated that don't pertain to infrastructure that's in the right-of-way.

301
00:31:55.903 --> 00:32:01.393
<v Andrew Speer>Maybe it's related to permitting or some other item that doesn't relate to the fees.

302
00:32:01.905 --> 00:32:19.473
<v Andrew Speer>But we also, through the right-of-way code, are able to have one universal code that that creates a level playing field for users of the right-of-way, which I think has a lot of benefits because we're not arguing with one company over— that's a different argument from Company B.

303
00:32:19.683 --> 00:32:26.253
<v Andrew Speer>And so there's some economies of scale on how we can administer and ensure compliance.

304
00:32:29.884 --> 00:32:36.469
<v Andrew Speer>Wanted to give you a little overview about who are the bureaus across the city that interact or engage with the right-of-way.

305
00:32:37.693 --> 00:32:44.714
<v Andrew Speer>So we as BPS, we provide the legal access to the right-of-way via our code and then franchise agreements.

306
00:32:45.374 --> 00:32:49.454
<v Andrew Speer>And then PBOT operates and maintains the asset, the physical asset itself.

307
00:32:50.675 --> 00:32:56.605
<v Andrew Speer>BTS has infrastructure in the right-of-way that they pay fees on, namely fiber.

308
00:32:57.409 --> 00:33:03.722
<v Andrew Speer>And then the Revenue Bureau, they are the entity that we work with to process our payments.

309
00:33:04.076 --> 00:33:11.958
<v Andrew Speer>Just for reference point, again, we bring in about just over $100 million a year, and we're the 3rd largest contributor to the city's general fund.

310
00:33:13.079 --> 00:33:22.753
<v Andrew Speer>And then the Water Bureau, via water and sewer, pay into the fund also as part of their fees with their assets in the right-of-way.

311
00:33:26.920 --> 00:33:31.517
<v Andrew Speer>So earlier this year, we brought forward the items related to the Mt.

312
00:33:31.566 --> 00:33:32.990
<v Andrew Speer>Hood Cable Regulatory Commission dissolution.

313
00:33:33.055 --> 00:33:43.718
<v Andrew Speer>So I just wanted to level set with you all about what the commission performed on behalf of the jurisdictions, and then that'll kind of give some context to the rest of the presentation.

314
00:33:45.400 --> 00:33:52.002
<v Andrew Speer>So the Mount Hood Cable Regulatory Commission provided this list of duties on behalf of jurisdictions.

315
00:33:52.260 --> 00:33:55.993
<v Andrew Speer>I'd like to highlight the first bullet, which is negotiate the franchise agreement.

316
00:33:56.057 --> 00:34:12.307
<v Andrew Speer>So the franchise agreement was negotiated on behalf of all member jurisdictions, so all 6 member jurisdictions, and then— Uh, we also applied compliance of the franchise agreement, uh, across all jurisdictions as well.

317
00:34:12.387 --> 00:34:20.467
<v Andrew Speer>So there were some instances where we would, you know, call out, uh, certain violations and then resolve that with Comcast.

318
00:34:20.884 --> 00:34:27.693
<v Andrew Speer>Many times it wasn't— didn't result in a fine, but, uh, there were instances where a fine was working towards being assessed.

319
00:34:28.496 --> 00:34:37.849
<v Andrew Speer>Um, also did a lot of work on the the advocacy front, right, tracking and maintaining awareness on FCC and federal legislation.

320
00:34:38.938 --> 00:34:45.065
<v Andrew Speer>That was critical, I think, mostly in the '80s, the early part of the commission's formation.

321
00:34:45.753 --> 00:34:58.228
<v Andrew Speer>But I'll get to some stuff later here in these slides that will show some other angles of federal legislation that are trying to take away jurisdictional authority to administer it right away.

322
00:34:58.822 --> 00:34:59.271
<v Andrew Speer>Access.

323
00:35:00.425 --> 00:35:07.510
<v Andrew Speer>And then we also did the contracting for— the commission rather did contracting for the community media centers.

324
00:35:07.559 --> 00:35:13.827
<v Andrew Speer>So we had the 2 community media centers within the Cable Regulatory Commission, which was Open Signal and Metro East.

325
00:35:14.228 --> 00:35:30.577
<v Andrew Speer>So those contracts were through the commission, and then we also through the commission provided the funds out to the community media centers, which were PEG funds, the public education and government PEG funds for assets that purchased on behalf of PEG programming.

326
00:35:31.572 --> 00:35:44.856
<v Andrew Speer>And then lastly, the key item which I think really impacted community greatly was the grants program that the commission administered, which created original programming and content that would be aired on the cable channels.

327
00:35:48.416 --> 00:35:54.998
<v Andrew Speer>These next slides will show some of the trends we've been seeing both to revenue and customers over time.

328
00:35:55.903 --> 00:35:58.619
<v Andrew Speer>And I think we'll give some context to the remainder of the presentation.

329
00:36:00.416 --> 00:36:05.976
<v Andrew Speer>This first graph provides a look at the cable subscriber trend, right?

330
00:36:06.057 --> 00:36:10.664
<v Andrew Speer>The cutting the cord has been around for some time now, maybe 2 decades.

331
00:36:10.728 --> 00:36:19.036
<v Andrew Speer>But here we can kind of see the impact of it with 2016 being the peak of our cable subscribers here Uh, in the city.

332
00:36:20.181 --> 00:36:22.873
<v Andrew Speer>And you see the 2025 amount.

333
00:36:23.003 --> 00:36:32.217
<v Andrew Speer>We don't yet have the '26 amount, but I would expect that we are another $15,000 or more less than this '25 amount when we end this calendar year.

334
00:36:33.739 --> 00:36:36.594
<v Andrew Speer>So how does that impact our revenues?

335
00:36:37.498 --> 00:36:55.163
<v Andrew Speer>Uh, this slide, uh, the upper line, which is the blue line, is a representation of the franchise fees and just for reference point, the franchise fee is a standard assessment of a fee, which is 5% of gross revenues earned within the City of Portland.

336
00:36:56.014 --> 00:36:57.121
<v Andrew Speer>So that's the upper line.

337
00:36:57.233 --> 00:37:02.867
<v Andrew Speer>And then the lower line that's in orange is a representation of the PEG revenue.

338
00:37:02.932 --> 00:37:10.284
<v Andrew Speer>So the public education and government revenue that is only allowable for capital purchases related to PEG programming.

339
00:37:10.943 --> 00:37:18.882
<v Andrew Speer>That is assessed also on gross percentage of gross revenues, but but for the most of this line, it was at a 3% rate.

340
00:37:20.639 --> 00:37:26.360
<v Andrew Speer>And so I just wanted to also key you in on the start date in 2026.

341
00:37:26.536 --> 00:37:32.407
<v Andrew Speer>Earlier this year is when we renewed the franchise agreement with Comcast, which was a 10-year agreement.

342
00:37:32.891 --> 00:37:35.693
<v Andrew Speer>And then our end date is 2036.

343
00:37:35.871 --> 00:37:42.539
<v Andrew Speer>I wasn't able to get 36 on the graph for some reason, so apologies, but the end date is there in red text.

344
00:37:42.637 --> 00:37:42.818
<v Andrew Speer>Thank you.

345
00:37:44.557 --> 00:37:55.934
<v Andrew Speer>So you can see by the time we get out towards the last 2 or 3 years of the franchise agreement, we start to get well under $2 million for franchise fees.

346
00:37:56.192 --> 00:38:03.503
<v Andrew Speer>And then PEG, we're near— we're under $500,000, probably closer to $350,000 or $200,000.

347
00:38:04.016 --> 00:38:13.047
<v Andrew Speer>So that really doesn't allow for us to accommodate for either inflation or any other, right, cost trends.

348
00:38:13.159 --> 00:38:23.481
<v Andrew Speer>And so how do we then look at this going forward is, I think, the biggest question as a city for whether or not we have a franchise agreement going into the future for cable.

349
00:38:26.204 --> 00:38:31.172
<v Andrew Speer>This next slide is keying in on some legal frameworks that impact cable uniquely.

350
00:38:31.510 --> 00:38:33.268
<v Andrew Speer>And so I'll just walk through those.

351
00:38:34.822 --> 00:38:41.766
<v Andrew Speer>The Cable Act is the federal legislation which governs how cable operates across the country.

352
00:38:42.344 --> 00:38:47.702
<v Andrew Speer>It's what formed the PEG, Public Education and Government dollars and the use thereof.

353
00:38:48.295 --> 00:38:58.929
<v Andrew Speer>It also sets out the requirement to— for jurisdictions to have a franchise agreement, meaning we can't have cable or Comcast be under the right-of-way code.

354
00:38:59.121 --> 00:39:10.550
<v Andrew Speer>We need to have a franchise agreement in order for them to operate On the right-hand side is an FCC regulation that I wanted to make you aware of.

355
00:39:10.679 --> 00:39:17.230
<v Andrew Speer>And I think we've talked briefly in a couple other contexts in other presentations on this mixed-use rule.

356
00:39:17.342 --> 00:39:30.476
<v Andrew Speer>But in short, the mixed-use rule was passed in 2019 by the FCC, and it prevents jurisdictions from assigning fees for other services who are cable operators.

357
00:39:30.748 --> 00:39:32.081
<v Andrew Speer>So what does that mean?

358
00:39:33.061 --> 00:39:34.280
<v Andrew Speer>Think of Comcast as a cable operator.

359
00:39:34.329 --> 00:39:34.425
<v Andrew Speer>Right.

360
00:39:34.826 --> 00:39:46.106
<v Andrew Speer>Cable operator and an ISP, an internet service provider, we can only assess fees on the cable portion of their revenues earned within the city.

361
00:39:46.780 --> 00:39:52.516
<v Andrew Speer>The internet that they earn— internet revenues associated with internet service, we cannot assess fees on.

362
00:39:52.612 --> 00:40:00.768
<v Andrew Speer>And so that's, uh, as you go forward through time, right, their, their customer base and growth is in the internet side and the decline is in the cable side.

363
00:40:00.833 --> 00:40:00.945
<v Andrew Speer>Thank you.

364
00:40:06.501 --> 00:40:14.166
<v Andrew Speer>Um, couple threats just to think of more globally when it comes to federal, uh, legislation and/or the FCC.

365
00:40:14.634 --> 00:40:20.851
<v Andrew Speer>So over the past 2 and a half, 3 years, there's been an effort by Congress to propose some legislation.

366
00:40:20.898 --> 00:40:37.226
<v Andrew Speer>It was first started as House Bill, uh, 3557, which, you know, without going into too much detail, it provided a pathway that restricted the jurisdictions, the local jurisdiction's ability to govern its right-of-way.

367
00:40:37.369 --> 00:40:51.985
<v Andrew Speer>And so the best analogy that there is, uh, with wireless, um, the FCC has been able to institute rulemaking that, you know, prevents us as jurisdictions from siting a location in the right-of-way.

368
00:40:52.048 --> 00:41:05.452
<v Andrew Speer>For example, if, if AT&T or Verizon says, I want it here, there's uh, any way for us to prevent that location so long as it meets, you know, reasonable land use standards and safety requirements.

369
00:41:05.918 --> 00:41:14.713
<v Andrew Speer>So that 3557 legislation that's popped up twice now in 2 different Congresses is getting at that at a more global stage.

370
00:41:14.842 --> 00:41:48.623
<v Andrew Speer>And so across industries and would impact, you know, mostly in the telecom— telecommunications sector and prevent jurisdictions from, you know, not siting or similarly, with the FCC rulemaking, we've just seen a trend with wanting the FCC engaging in open dockets to explore other rulemaking that would prevent autonomy of the jurisdiction, namely in the space of shot clocks or siting of facilities again.

371
00:41:52.889 --> 00:41:53.425
<v Andrew Speer>Community media and PEGs.

372
00:41:53.523 --> 00:42:07.025
<v Andrew Speer>So the community media centers, and for us here in Portland, that's Open Signal, are a critical part of the public communications and then PEG being the public education and government revenues, which was the orange line that we saw on the graph with the revenue slide.

373
00:42:10.384 --> 00:42:11.541
<v Andrew Speer>Public education and government.

374
00:42:11.590 --> 00:42:15.847
<v Andrew Speer>So there's 2 different modes that cities and jurisdictions will take.

375
00:42:16.266 --> 00:42:22.338
<v Andrew Speer>Some do in-house airing and recording of their public meetings.

376
00:42:22.449 --> 00:42:28.811
<v Andrew Speer>So most, you know, relatable to us is Seattle has all that in-house for their city.

377
00:42:29.813 --> 00:42:35.335
<v Andrew Speer>We have the model of using a community media center, which is Open Signal, and we contract with them.

378
00:42:36.047 --> 00:42:49.659
<v Andrew Speer>As part of the dissolution, we just created a citywide procurement contract that any bureau that has public meetings can access and get Open Signal services for recording and airing that meeting.

379
00:42:51.385 --> 00:42:55.918
<v Andrew Speer>They also interface with Comcast for the— there's encoders that transfer the signal from—.

380
00:42:55.918 --> 00:42:56.208
<v Andrew Speer>The internet.

381
00:42:58.396 --> 00:43:01.784
<v Andrew Speer>The recording that Open Signal provides onto the cable network.

382
00:43:01.882 --> 00:43:07.661
<v Andrew Speer>And so they have those encoders and do that transfer of the signal onto the cable network.

383
00:43:08.208 --> 00:43:25.784
<v Andrew Speer>And then we also, as a city, provide— so we have their fee for service via the procurement contract, and then we also issue them PEG revenues for their capital needs related to airing the the content onto the cable network.

384
00:43:26.123 --> 00:43:33.436
<v Andrew Speer>And then we also provide them through BPS a grant for their digital equity work that they do in the community as well.

385
00:43:37.264 --> 00:43:44.469
<v Andrew Speer>So I'll start to get into some just questions, I think mostly, but I'll have some commentary on those questions as we go.

386
00:43:46.931 --> 00:43:54.643
<v Andrew Speer>I think the largest question in my mind is the first bullet, which is you know, is a cable franchise needed?

387
00:43:54.851 --> 00:43:59.184
<v Andrew Speer>And what does that look like through time as we look at the revenues?

388
00:43:59.360 --> 00:44:04.842
<v Andrew Speer>And then we think about the growth of ISP service or needs.

389
00:44:05.846 --> 00:44:11.195
<v Andrew Speer>And what are the— what's the opportunity costs that we're looking at from a revenue perspective?

390
00:44:11.259 --> 00:44:24.016
<v Andrew Speer>And then I think we need to be vigilant on the areas My previous slides that were calling out those federal and legislative threats, being able to monitor those, advocate.

391
00:44:24.161 --> 00:44:32.606
<v Andrew Speer>We do through my program's work, we also advocate with the FCC and provide responses to their dockets.

392
00:44:32.702 --> 00:44:33.746
<v Andrew Speer>So we're doing that work.

393
00:44:33.827 --> 00:44:47.346
<v Andrew Speer>And then we're also a member of an organization called NTOA, which we collaborate and advocate on behalf of local jurisdictional needs around right-of-way and cable and access and telecommunication issues.

394
00:44:49.528 --> 00:44:54.503
<v Andrew Speer>On the PEG piece, you know, what is the— you saw the decline of PEG or the forecast decline.

395
00:44:55.164 --> 00:45:05.047
<v Andrew Speer>What does that look like and how does that meet the needs or not meet the needs of our current situation with Open Signal and their future capital needs over time?

396
00:45:06.561 --> 00:45:13.753
<v Andrew Speer>And how do we— what are the needs of our service for recording as public meetings through time as well?

397
00:45:17.563 --> 00:45:31.630
<v Andrew Speer>This is my last content slide here, but when I think of our program's work and what it does on behalf of residents in the city, it's really ensuring that we recover fair compensation for use of the right-of-way.

398
00:45:31.693 --> 00:45:48.268
<v Andrew Speer>And so with that in mind, I reference back to that previous bullet on the first slide, on the last slide of you know, how do we ensure that Comcast is paying its share appropriately for the revenues it earns within the jurisdiction?

399
00:45:48.364 --> 00:46:01.771
<v Andrew Speer>And so that's, you know, again, just both how I approach this work and then wanting to ensure that we're recovering the appropriate fees for the use of these companies with their assets in the right-of-way.

400
00:46:02.876 --> 00:46:11.222
<v Andrew Speer>And then, you know, how do we think about and deal with that that decline of revenues with Open Signal and their capital needs.

401
00:46:13.550 --> 00:46:25.539
<v Andrew Speer>And, you know, I, I think these last 2 bullets were repeated on the earlier slide, but I'm really interested in also thinking through, through our MHCRC work, right?

402
00:46:25.588 --> 00:46:28.864
<v Andrew Speer>We had the community benefits via the grants program.

403
00:46:29.557 --> 00:46:33.414
<v Andrew Speer>With the commission being gone, we don't have that same grants program.

404
00:46:33.463 --> 00:46:38.869
<v Andrew Speer>And so how do we as a city think about community benefits in the telecom thank you.

405
00:46:38.918 --> 00:46:44.485
<v Andrew Speer>So the question is, what's the impact on community space or cable space, and what can we propose moving forward?

406
00:46:44.534 --> 00:46:52.550
<v Andrew Speer>That's a question that me and my team are thinking through and recommending kind of a few options up through our leadership.

407
00:46:52.632 --> 00:46:59.554
<v Andrew Speer>So how do we move forward in that space, given that cable is declining and peg— and that's impacting revenues?

408
00:47:01.378 --> 00:47:05.405
<v Andrew Speer>That concludes my presentation, and I'm happy to take any questions.

409
00:47:08.092 --> 00:47:11.123
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, does anybody want to start us off with questions?

410
00:47:12.438 --> 00:47:15.309
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Montavilla.

411
00:47:16.512 --> 00:47:17.121
<v Angelita Morillo>Um, thank you, Chair.

412
00:47:17.795 --> 00:47:19.222
<v Angelita Morillo>Um, thanks so much for this presentation.

413
00:47:19.800 --> 00:47:22.992
<v Angelita Morillo>Uh, I just had one or two questions.

414
00:47:23.648 --> 00:47:51.398
<v Angelita Morillo>Um, so it's my understanding that in 2018, the FCC adopted rules and regulations around fees related to small cells during the rise in 5G availability, um, and that ruling around allowed for one or two fee methodologies for local jurisdictions, a federally prescribed safe harbor fee, which the council adopted, or a fee calculation with the approximate actual costs of small wireless facility deployments, which is a cost recovery methodology.

415
00:47:52.137 --> 00:47:58.672
<v Angelita Morillo>Has any consideration of changing the methodology to bring in more revenue to cover program costs been considered?

416
00:48:01.590 --> 00:48:08.545
<v Andrew Speer>Yes, it has been considered and was when we were bringing right-of-way code to the council for approval.

417
00:48:08.836 --> 00:48:14.108
<v Andrew Speer>And so it's— there's a few layers.

418
00:48:14.155 --> 00:48:22.443
<v Andrew Speer>I think there's some practical right-of-way code updates that we need to make and that the bureau is working on and we are working on to bring forward to you all.

419
00:48:22.976 --> 00:48:33.137
<v Andrew Speer>And then within that, I think we can then look kind of shift gears to looking at the fees, um, but it has been on the list of to-dos to circle back to.

420
00:48:33.940 --> 00:48:34.246
<v Angelita Morillo>Gotcha.

421
00:48:34.293 --> 00:48:41.407
<v Angelita Morillo>So if we were to make a switch, we would have to address those things first and then consider that, or would we not do that at all?

422
00:48:42.755 --> 00:48:46.592
<v Andrew Speer>Do you mean address the right-of-way code updates and then the fees?

423
00:48:47.010 --> 00:48:47.123
<v Angelita Morillo>Yeah.

424
00:48:47.652 --> 00:48:53.851
<v Andrew Speer>Um, I, I don't— I think it's a little bit up to the willingness of what's recommended.

425
00:48:54.074 --> 00:49:10.677
<v Andrew Speer>I, I, from the programmatic end, I wanted to be able to get the, um, the administrative changes because that's really tying into our compliance enforcement and that being the first step before making any fee changes.

426
00:49:11.255 --> 00:49:11.577
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Gotcha.

427
00:49:11.818 --> 00:49:12.059
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay.

428
00:49:12.878 --> 00:49:16.619
<v Angelita Morillo>And are there any other fee increases that we should be considering at this time?

429
00:49:18.349 --> 00:49:30.036
<v Andrew Speer>There was, yeah, I mean, for the right-of-way code, there was one other small practical item related to the per-foot fees and the minimum payment associated with that.

430
00:49:30.231 --> 00:49:37.413
<v Andrew Speer>But that, it's somewhat of a nominal impact because there's not a lot of per-foot payers.

431
00:49:38.192 --> 00:49:41.797
<v Andrew Speer>So we're not talking hundreds of thousands, but maybe tens of thousands.

432
00:49:43.460 --> 00:49:43.750
<v Angelita Morillo>Gotcha.

433
00:49:43.831 --> 00:49:44.056
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay.

434
00:49:44.768 --> 00:49:47.206
<v Angelita Morillo>Um, all right, I think that's all the questions I had.

435
00:49:47.304 --> 00:49:47.981
<v Angelita Morillo>Thanks for your time.

436
00:49:48.483 --> 00:49:48.757
<v Andrew Speer>Thank you.

437
00:49:49.612 --> 00:49:50.210
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

438
00:49:50.259 --> 00:49:51.018
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Ryan.

439
00:49:51.309 --> 00:49:52.746
<v Dan Ryan>Thank you, Chair Pirtle-Guiney.

440
00:49:54.606 --> 00:49:55.686
<v Dan Ryan>And a couple questions.

441
00:49:56.137 --> 00:49:58.396
<v Dan Ryan>Um, first one is slide 14.

442
00:49:59.704 --> 00:50:07.099
<v Dan Ryan>I just want to know what you mean— I'm assuming what you mean by permitting shot clocks, perhaps because we had a basketball testimony earlier.

443
00:50:07.474 --> 00:50:07.847
<v Dan Ryan>What is that?

444
00:50:08.300 --> 00:50:08.932
<v Dan Ryan>What does that mean?

445
00:50:09.353 --> 00:50:21.284
<v Andrew Speer>Yeah, with Order 621 that was passed in 2019, it imposed on jurisdictions an amount of days in which they must process permits.

446
00:50:22.940 --> 00:50:32.900
<v Andrew Speer>And so it required— I forget the number of days, but I think it was— I want to say less than 60, but don't quote me.

447
00:50:34.697 --> 00:50:43.175
<v Andrew Speer>It required— it put that, um, onus on, for us, PBOT, to process those permits in that amount of time or less.

448
00:50:44.670 --> 00:50:46.563
<v Dan Ryan>So it was kind of what I was thinking.

449
00:50:46.981 --> 00:50:47.559
<v Andrew Speer>Um, yeah, yeah.

450
00:50:47.719 --> 00:50:48.570
<v Dan Ryan>Okay, thanks, Andrew.

451
00:50:48.684 --> 00:50:53.420
<v Dan Ryan>The second one is slide 18, and you asked what our concerns would be.

452
00:50:53.501 --> 00:51:02.751
<v Dan Ryan>Probably the only one that's really rattled in my head has been how does the city manage the public education government PEG, the services over time.

453
00:51:03.027 --> 00:51:07.244
<v Dan Ryan>That's probably the main thing that I've been thinking about when we have this conversation.

454
00:51:08.070 --> 00:51:11.708
<v Dan Ryan>So I look forward to any suggestions you have since you live and breathe this daily.

455
00:51:12.047 --> 00:51:20.094
<v Andrew Speer>Yeah, I mean, I, um, I, I think there's both an administrative and a policy question there, right?

456
00:51:20.239 --> 00:51:37.829
<v Andrew Speer>Um, I, as cable declines, and if we didn't, for instance, after 2036 have a cable franchise there would be nothing for us to air to, um, under the current system we're on now, right, with how we use Open Signal.

457
00:51:37.911 --> 00:51:49.985
<v Andrew Speer>And so, um, I, I mean, that, that's just a question for that future leadership and council, like, how do we, how do we need to operate in a kind of post-cable world?

458
00:51:50.677 --> 00:51:54.262
<v Andrew Speer>Um, I wasn't necessarily recommending anything either way.

459
00:51:55.572 --> 00:52:03.697
<v Andrew Speer>But just illustrating that other cities have different modes of, you know, recording and broadcasting their government meetings.

460
00:52:05.047 --> 00:52:08.338
<v Dan Ryan>Well, I think it's great that you're suggesting something because it's going to go away.

461
00:52:08.739 --> 00:52:10.554
<v Dan Ryan>And so I think we all want access.

462
00:52:10.811 --> 00:52:21.681
<v Dan Ryan>So I think hearing what some of those other systems are and that you're, as the leader of this unit within the city, you're explaining to us what future could look like.

463
00:52:23.014 --> 00:52:23.271
<v Andrew Speer>Thank you.

464
00:52:23.431 --> 00:52:34.478
<v Andrew Speer>Yeah, I, I think there's an opportunity to assess what the needs are, and then how does that needs align with community and access, which kind of my— has been my operating.

465
00:52:34.911 --> 00:52:38.588
<v Dan Ryan>I think what you just said is really easy to go like this to, like agreement.

466
00:52:39.070 --> 00:52:45.911
<v Dan Ryan>So, um, anyway, here for this journey, and, uh, just know that's the top of mind for me, is to make sure that the public has access to government.

467
00:52:46.456 --> 00:52:46.873
<v Dan Ryan>That's all.

468
00:52:47.514 --> 00:52:52.498
<v Dan Ryan>And I have to say, I kind of like this permitting clock for permits in general.

469
00:52:52.547 --> 00:52:53.012
<v Dan Ryan>Hi, Donnie.

470
00:52:53.670 --> 00:52:56.650
<v Dan Ryan>Um, I think it's a good language that we can keep putting into the culture.

471
00:52:57.836 --> 00:53:08.561
<v Andrew Speer>And I do want to note on the permitting shot clock, I think industry came in for the wireless side and said, hey, you know, we're going to deploy 700 small cells into your community.

472
00:53:09.235 --> 00:53:19.788
<v Andrew Speer>What we ended up with was under 300 Uh, total cell sites, and then of that, about 230 were small cells.

473
00:53:20.284 --> 00:53:32.815
<v Andrew Speer>And so, you know, I think there's a— I, I just want council over time to be aware that when these new deployments come forward, there's a lot of, uh, expectation and forecasts and promise made.

474
00:53:32.896 --> 00:53:39.601
<v Andrew Speer>But, um, in Seattle, talking to my colleagues up there, they had this similar experience where yes.

475
00:53:39.793 --> 00:53:41.768
<v Andrew Speer>A large number was forecasted.

476
00:53:41.815 --> 00:53:53.498
<v Andrew Speer>And so that— it's the tail wagging the dog where you have a lot of staffing up within anticipation for those permitting inflow, and then the shot clock stress.

477
00:53:53.818 --> 00:53:58.985
<v Andrew Speer>And in talking with PBOT, they don't have the demand nearly to what they had staffed for.

478
00:54:00.349 --> 00:54:03.333
<v Andrew Speer>So it's a tension that has existed.

479
00:54:03.623 --> 00:54:07.922
<v Andrew Speer>And they've more than met the shot clock requirements with all their providers.

480
00:54:08.436 --> 00:54:21.161
<v Andrew Speer>And on the wireless side, What many times will occur is that a site will be permitted for, and then it won't be built within the year time that the permit was issued, and so the permit expires.

481
00:54:21.900 --> 00:54:27.661
<v Andrew Speer>Um, so there's a lot of industry, you know, construction build-out issues.

482
00:54:27.838 --> 00:54:32.684
<v Dan Ryan>I was actually kind of having fun with that, but I was enjoying the fact that I was learning about the forecasting of sales.

483
00:54:32.813 --> 00:54:35.108
<v Dan Ryan>And, you know, you don't take these jobs unless you're curious.

484
00:54:35.155 --> 00:54:36.905
<v Dan Ryan>So anyway, thank you for that education.

485
00:54:37.773 --> 00:54:38.507
<v Dan Ryan>Appreciate it.

486
00:54:39.945 --> 00:54:40.711
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

487
00:54:41.088 --> 00:54:42.721
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I've got a couple of questions.

488
00:54:44.266 --> 00:55:04.909
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>As we are talking about this and we see that chart with fewer and fewer people subscribing to cable and less and less revenue coming in from that to monitor the programs, as I have heard people talk about this and as we had the conversation in the spring, we talk about one provider, we talk about Comcast.

489
00:55:04.974 --> 00:55:10.021
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>How many cable providers are there in our community at this Um, let's see.

490
00:55:10.244 --> 00:55:10.262
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I—.

491
00:55:11.449 --> 00:55:12.958
<v Andrew Speer>Oh, excuse me, cable providers?

492
00:55:13.007 --> 00:55:13.440
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Providers.

493
00:55:13.713 --> 00:55:15.400
<v Andrew Speer>We, we only have Comcast.

494
00:55:15.496 --> 00:55:19.590
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, so that is the last cable provider left in Portland.

495
00:55:19.894 --> 00:55:37.469
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And the FCC rule that you flagged, the mixed-use rule, did that say that you can't regulate an entity as an internet and a cable provider, or that you cannot regulate— that if If an entity provides some cable, you must regulate them as a cable provider.

496
00:55:37.934 --> 00:55:40.195
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>You can't regulate them as an internet provider.

497
00:55:40.579 --> 00:55:43.786
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is it an either/or, or is it an if A, then not B?

498
00:55:44.202 --> 00:55:46.831
<v Andrew Speer>Well, I think there's 2 ways to think about it.

499
00:55:47.088 --> 00:55:55.023
<v Andrew Speer>One is on the fee and the fee assessment, and then one is on the practical, like, operations of the right-of-way, so the permitting and construction side.

500
00:55:55.423 --> 00:56:01.967
<v Andrew Speer>So we have the ability through our— since it's a shared line that that, that their Comcast is using.

501
00:56:02.641 --> 00:56:13.175
<v Andrew Speer>We have full ability to regulate the construction and the permitting requirements as if it— we don't delineate between services there, right?

502
00:56:13.304 --> 00:56:24.849
<v Andrew Speer>But then on the fee side of things, for the compensation and use of the right-of-way, we can only assess fees on the gross revenues earned for cable and not internet.

503
00:56:24.896 --> 00:56:24.960
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

504
00:56:25.443 --> 00:56:29.744
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So essentially, we have many internet providers.

505
00:56:30.001 --> 00:56:32.844
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have one joint cable and internet provider.

506
00:56:33.871 --> 00:56:43.826
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It takes the same amount of staff work to regulate the use of the right-of-way for both our solely internet providers and our internet plus cable provider.

507
00:56:45.271 --> 00:56:58.018
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We can assess the full cost recovery from our internet providers and not from the provider that is yeah, there's a little bit of nuance there.

508
00:56:59.603 --> 00:57:05.797
<v Andrew Speer>The cable— we don't have maybe as many cable providers across the city as we might envision.

509
00:57:06.235 --> 00:57:12.507
<v Andrew Speer>We have Comcast, we have Lumen or CenturyLink, which—.

510
00:57:12.523 --> 00:57:12.992
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Providers.

511
00:57:13.090 --> 00:57:17.237
<v Andrew Speer>Yes, which used to be— which recently sold their fiber assets to Verizon.

512
00:57:17.478 --> 00:57:19.262
<v Andrew Speer>Sets to AT&T.

513
00:57:20.056 --> 00:57:25.389
<v Andrew Speer>So AT&T is, is its only entity providing ISP service.

514
00:57:25.630 --> 00:57:33.478
<v Andrew Speer>And then, um, Ziply, uh, Ziply Fiber, which provides telephone, wired telephone service and internet service.

515
00:57:35.050 --> 00:57:40.797
<v Andrew Speer>The, the market share of Comcast is about— is over 80%.

516
00:57:40.958 --> 00:57:47.481
<v Andrew Speer>So they're covering 80% of the jurisdiction, and then and the other 2 providers are roughly 20%.

517
00:57:47.820 --> 00:57:54.516
<v Andrew Speer>And so that's the lay of the land in terms of who's out there as providers.

518
00:57:54.630 --> 00:57:56.469
<v Andrew Speer>But I'm sorry, and I forgot your question.

519
00:57:56.567 --> 00:57:57.054
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That's okay.

520
00:57:57.135 --> 00:57:57.721
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That's okay.

521
00:57:58.355 --> 00:57:59.884
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That's actually helpful information.

522
00:58:00.628 --> 00:58:04.635
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>What would happen if we said we weren't regulating cable anymore?

523
00:58:04.827 --> 00:58:11.523
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We're going to reach a point where there are, I'm going to use the number 10, 10 subscribers left.

524
00:58:14.481 --> 00:58:14.884
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Sure.

525
00:58:14.965 --> 00:58:23.494
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Do we, are we in this environment until that number naturally gets to zero?

526
00:58:24.541 --> 00:58:28.204
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Or is there a point where we say we're not doing this anymore?

527
00:58:28.414 --> 00:58:31.367
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And if so, what happens to those subscribers at that point?

528
00:58:33.380 --> 00:58:39.123
<v Andrew Speer>Yeah, I mean, I think that's the policy question of, Is it right?

529
00:58:39.172 --> 00:58:50.733
<v Andrew Speer>So we have the franchise agreement, which could be terminated if it was mutually agreed upon early, but let's just say it goes to its full term to 2036.

530
00:58:51.246 --> 00:59:10.152
<v Andrew Speer>So do we— we, you know, companies will reach out about 2 years before the franchise agreement is expiring to start negotiations to re-up, so there's a question in my mind of, is there— you know, we, we can see here what the— we expect the revenues to be.

531
00:59:10.460 --> 00:59:27.699
<v Andrew Speer>That's not correlating to customer counts exactly, but, um, at that— that is kind of my question to you all, is like, at what point is, is the floor low enough that it's no longer viable to maintain a cable franchise in the city?

532
00:59:30.509 --> 00:59:39.246
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, for cities that, um, would no longer have cable franchises, I'm assuming this has happened somewhere.

533
00:59:39.376 --> 00:59:40.793
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We're not the only city facing this.

534
00:59:41.291 --> 00:59:41.371
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I—.

535
00:59:42.014 --> 00:59:49.445
<v Andrew Speer>We are, we are certainly not unique with what we're facing, but I don't know of any city that said no, we're not doing cable franchises.

536
00:59:49.978 --> 00:59:59.300
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Are there cities that do their, their PEG programming through other broadcast means, not through cable?

537
01:00:00.329 --> 01:00:04.538
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is there a city that's figured out we still want to have this public interest programming, right?

538
01:00:04.603 --> 01:00:08.425
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And not just the streaming of our meetings.

539
01:00:08.603 --> 01:00:18.146
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I know we are very funny and interesting and good-looking up here, but there's lots of other programming on Open Signal station.

540
01:00:18.836 --> 01:00:32.632
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So are there cities that have figured out beyond just the streaming of government meetings, those public and educational pieces of the PEG work, um, a space to move those to off of cable?

541
01:00:32.711 --> 01:00:34.686
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And what does that look like in those communities?

542
01:00:35.827 --> 01:00:45.846
<v Andrew Speer>Um, I've had conversations through conferences with, uh, entities that do the in-house work, um, where the employees are, are city employees.

543
01:00:46.585 --> 01:01:04.940
<v Andrew Speer>I've talked with a couple of them, and they, they're on the East Coast, I forget what jurisdictions, but they were telling me that they've worked out agreements with streaming services to provide like a, you know, kind of an on-demand option of accessing PEG-like offerings.

544
01:01:05.038 --> 01:01:07.829
<v Andrew Speer>So either council meetings or unique programming.

545
01:01:09.208 --> 01:01:15.289
<v Andrew Speer>But I don't know of any other tangible examples outside of those one or two conversations I've had.

546
01:01:15.929 --> 01:01:48.228
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So presumably when we reach the point where we say we're not regulating cable anymore, we don't have a franchise agreement anymore, and we regulate Comcast like we do our other internet providers, um, we could have some sort of agreement where some of the funds that come in from that regulation pay for access to on-demand content through a streaming service, both both for our meetings and for the other public and educational content that Open Signal provides.

547
01:01:49.880 --> 01:01:51.476
<v Andrew Speer>That, yes, that could be an option.

548
01:01:51.525 --> 01:01:56.721
<v Andrew Speer>I, I think one thing that's helpful to keep in mind is PEG channels are unique to cable.

549
01:01:56.769 --> 01:02:01.333
<v Andrew Speer>Like, you have to have cable in order to have access to the PEG channels.

550
01:02:02.396 --> 01:02:17.443
<v Andrew Speer>And so, right, people are accessing, for instance, council meetings through YouTube, and other, right, the other streaming, or Open Signal maintains the links to meetings through their website as well.

551
01:02:18.907 --> 01:02:25.617
<v Andrew Speer>So I just think it's important that within the discussion, the only access to PEG channels is through one having cable.

552
01:02:26.713 --> 01:02:31.208
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And when you put it on streaming, then it's limited to people who have that streaming subscription potentially.

553
01:02:31.887 --> 01:02:32.307
<v Andrew Speer>Correct.

554
01:02:32.534 --> 01:02:47.018
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Though if the city were to use fees to subsidize let's use YouTube, a YouTube channel that then provided all of the content, not just again our interesting conversations, but all of the PEG content.

555
01:02:47.565 --> 01:02:53.804
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And then we could also consider facilitating agreements with streaming services.

556
01:02:53.900 --> 01:03:01.472
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Would that be the, um, the best— would that maximize access?

557
01:03:01.519 --> 01:03:11.523
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm trying to think about how in the future we maximize access to the content that we are worried we're going to lose as the number of cable subscribers decreases?

558
01:03:12.710 --> 01:03:35.114
<v Andrew Speer>Yeah, I mean, I, I, I'm not sure I'm qualified to answer that question fully, but, um, I, I think there's— what stands out to me is that there's an opportunity to evaluate the need and then how access could be given out differently, um, through either Public spaces like YouTube or streaming services that are paid for.

559
01:03:35.193 --> 01:03:35.418
<v Dan Ryan>Yeah.

560
01:03:36.141 --> 01:03:36.606
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

561
01:03:36.768 --> 01:03:51.653
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I hope that as your team is considering that, you're looking not just at the streaming of our own meetings, but the other content that is currently, I'm going to say, somewhat subsidized through those fees that we collect.

562
01:03:51.702 --> 01:04:07.958
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And how do we make sure that as the paradigm of how people stream media changes, we continue to have access to that type of programming that is available to the entire community, whether or not you subscribe to a streaming service.

563
01:04:08.039 --> 01:04:14.907
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I hope that as you're asking the questions you listed, you're holding that as one of the goals that we ultimately get to in the answers.

564
01:04:16.222 --> 01:04:16.402
<v Andrew Speer>Yes.

565
01:04:16.451 --> 01:04:17.036
<v Andrew Speer>Yeah, for sure.

566
01:04:17.182 --> 01:04:17.525
<v Andrew Speer>Thank you.

567
01:04:17.963 --> 01:04:18.175
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Great.

568
01:04:19.217 --> 01:04:20.746
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, any other questions?

569
01:04:23.163 --> 01:04:23.885
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Zimmerman.

570
01:04:26.090 --> 01:04:26.527
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thanks.

571
01:04:26.623 --> 01:04:38.007
<v Eric Zimmerman>Um, as somebody who appeared on public access, I think my first time maybe at like 10, 9 or 10 years old, I also quickly learned in the '90s it was a great channel to go to in the middle of the night if you needed to fall back asleep.

572
01:04:39.778 --> 01:04:55.630
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so I just want to compliment you, Chair, for living up to the spirit of public access television today, that this session might be one of the greater monotonous sessions and I think it just made so much sense that there was no flair in this because— I appreciate you, Andrew.

573
01:04:55.679 --> 01:05:01.481
<v Eric Zimmerman>I'm being a little bit funny here because it is important and it's so dry and it's so difficult to like get through this.

574
01:05:01.530 --> 01:05:04.800
<v Eric Zimmerman>So I say all this because it's important.

575
01:05:04.976 --> 01:05:06.306
<v Eric Zimmerman>It's a part of our revenue stream.

576
01:05:06.626 --> 01:05:07.556
<v Eric Zimmerman>We're gonna have to figure it out.

577
01:05:07.909 --> 01:05:18.809
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I'm also just— for me on these types of things, I'm going to be looking for a staff recommendation for like what makes the most sense rather than A council-driven type of process.

578
01:05:18.905 --> 01:05:26.452
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I think sometimes we should say that out loud, that there are other people who are probably in the best position to make good recommendations.

579
01:05:26.516 --> 01:05:29.257
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I would say that you're one of those people right now for us, for the City of Portland.

580
01:05:29.320 --> 01:05:38.389
<v Eric Zimmerman>So you've done a great job living up to the public access spirit of committees and why we're boring, as government should be so many times.

581
01:05:38.438 --> 01:05:42.315
<v Eric Zimmerman>I hope that many people fall back asleep after watching this if they happen upon it.

582
01:05:42.380 --> 01:05:43.117
<v Eric Zimmerman>So thank you, Chair.

583
01:05:43.181 --> 01:05:43.420
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you, Andrew.

584
01:05:43.469 --> 01:05:43.565
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

585
01:05:43.873 --> 01:05:53.853
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We had a session today where somebody rapped and danced on the testimony table, so I'm not sure what's boring about today's meeting.

586
01:05:54.931 --> 01:06:21.949
<v Andrew Speer>If, if I could maybe highlight one thing to your point, Councilor Zimmerman, doing some back-of-the-envelope math, if we look at the number of households in Portland and then we assume 80% of those households are in Comcast district, you get to about $12 million, just under $12 million of fees that we could be assessing to Comcast but currently cannot.

587
01:06:22.159 --> 01:06:31.572
<v Andrew Speer>And so, you know, I think at one time, right, you can see on this graph in, you know, 2015 era, we were getting, you know, we were up past $10 million for sure.

588
01:06:32.101 --> 01:06:49.829
<v Andrew Speer>And so now that cable isn't at that adoption rate, That feels like the important nexus to discuss about, like, the recommendation being that internet service is the important thing to go after— not go after, but to ensure compensation of use of the right-of-way for.

589
01:06:53.599 --> 01:06:55.262
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, colleagues and, and Councilor.

590
01:06:55.309 --> 01:07:11.184
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>While this may be dry, I do think that when we talk about $12 million that could be used to ensure that the programming that while dry is important, is accessible.

591
01:07:11.923 --> 01:07:25.003
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And also to think about how we could better, better secure access for all members of our community to internet services if we had some of those funds coming in.

592
01:07:25.311 --> 01:07:40.757
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think there's a lot of opportunity for the community being left on the table and also So to think that we are assessing for the, the use of our smaller internet companies and not the largest provider seems a bit, a bit off.

593
01:07:41.782 --> 01:07:42.568
<v Dan Ryan>So still dry.

594
01:07:43.001 --> 01:07:43.418
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Still dry.

595
01:07:43.690 --> 01:07:44.298
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Ryan.

596
01:07:44.507 --> 01:07:55.376
<v Dan Ryan>To add to the dryness, and the person has the most experience putting Portlanders to sleep because I was on the school board on Channel 28 and the aux, um, I'm a civics nerd, and so I like C-SPAN.

597
01:07:55.648 --> 01:07:56.898
<v Dan Ryan>I like these kind of programs.

598
01:07:57.335 --> 01:08:05.923
<v Dan Ryan>Where you actually watch the meeting and you get it unfiltered, as opposed to sifting through whatever's happening today with a lot of spin.

599
01:08:06.681 --> 01:08:15.588
<v Dan Ryan>And, um, I just hope we do figure this out because I think that a democracy doesn't move forward without providing such access to public meetings.

600
01:08:16.480 --> 01:08:16.960
<v Dan Ryan>So thank you.

601
01:08:21.796 --> 01:08:32.148
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Seeing no one else in the queue, I think you've heard a little bit about some of our interests up here, and you and I have had additional conversations about what we might be able to do.

602
01:08:32.774 --> 01:08:40.087
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, like I said, there's nothing imminent coming forward, but this is a conversation that I think we just need to have in the back of our minds.

603
01:08:41.097 --> 01:08:49.663
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Our next meeting is in 2 weeks, and we are going to be touching on 2 really interesting topics, Councilor Zimmerman.

604
01:08:50.081 --> 01:08:51.796
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm not surprised.

605
01:08:51.909 --> 01:08:53.259
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dan Ryan.

606
01:08:53.306 --> 01:08:53.949
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Mayor.

607
01:08:54.029 --> 01:09:02.465
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We're talking about our city's cannabis program and the fees that come in from that program and how they are used and our cannabis code.

608
01:09:02.529 --> 01:09:08.104
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>There is— there are some amendments to that code that the administration has asked to bring forward.

609
01:09:08.795 --> 01:09:18.738
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And then you will remember last year we had a conversation about needing to change some of the equity and workforce provisions within the CIP in the P section.

610
01:09:19.309 --> 01:09:28.185
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And we will have an ordinance from the administration coming to us at our next meeting with a proposal for new equity and workforce provisions within that program as well.

611
01:09:28.961 --> 01:09:31.965
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>With that, I will see you all in 2 weeks, and we are adjourned.

612
01:09:37.530 --> 01:09:38.092
<v Dan Ryan>Thank you.

