WEBVTT

1
00:06:03.220 --> 00:06:04.247
<v Olivia Clark>Good morning, everyone.

2
00:06:04.584 --> 00:06:07.089
<v Olivia Clark>It's a thin crowd out there today.

3
00:06:07.797 --> 00:06:10.541
<v Olivia Clark>Um, I'd like to—.

4
00:06:11.185 --> 00:06:11.875
<v Hannah Morrison>Where are our fans?

5
00:06:12.067 --> 00:06:12.807
<v Mitch Green>Where are our fans?

6
00:06:13.629 --> 00:06:13.805
<v Olivia Clark>Rideshare.

7
00:06:14.370 --> 00:06:15.206
<v Olivia Clark>Or a parking space.

8
00:06:15.350 --> 00:06:17.137
<v Olivia Clark>Or let's see, or the, or the door.

9
00:06:17.442 --> 00:06:18.295
<v Olivia Clark>Which door are we using?

10
00:06:18.343 --> 00:06:22.060
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, I'm going to call the meeting of the Public Works Committee to order.

11
00:06:22.252 --> 00:06:26.860
<v Olivia Clark>It is Tuesday, October 13th, at 9:32.

12
00:06:28.552 --> 00:06:30.276
<v Olivia Clark>Diana, can you please call the roll?

13
00:06:31.290 --> 00:06:31.742
<v Unidentified speaker>Good morning.

14
00:06:32.096 --> 00:06:32.305
<v Unidentified speaker>Green?

15
00:06:34.416 --> 00:06:35.029
<v Mitch Green>Here.

16
00:06:36.286 --> 00:06:36.497
<v Unidentified speaker>Smith?

17
00:06:37.882 --> 00:06:38.204
<v Loretta Smith>Here.

18
00:06:41.353 --> 00:06:43.475
<v Unidentified speaker>Here.

19
00:06:43.848 --> 00:06:44.122
<v Olivia Clark>Here.

20
00:06:45.970 --> 00:06:48.384
<v Olivia Clark>And Christopher, can you please read the statement of conduct?

21
00:06:48.723 --> 00:06:50.036
<v Olivia Clark>And good morning, nice to have you here.

22
00:06:50.800 --> 00:06:53.591
<v Unidentified speaker>Good morning, uh, welcome to the meeting of the Public Works Committee.

23
00:06:53.656 --> 00:07:04.514
<v Unidentified speaker>To testify before this committee in person or virtually, you must sign up in advance on the committee agenda at www.portland.gov/council/agenda/public-works-committee or by calling 311.

24
00:07:05.391 --> 00:07:08.456
<v Unidentified speaker>Registration for virtual testimony closes 1 hour prior to the meeting.

25
00:07:08.600 --> 00:07:11.343
<v Unidentified speaker>In-person testifiers must sign up before the agenda item is heard.

26
00:07:11.663 --> 00:07:16.346
<v Unidentified speaker>If public testimony will be taken on an item, individuals may testify for 3 minutes unless the Chair states otherwise.

27
00:07:16.764 --> 00:07:18.528
<v Unidentified speaker>Your microphone will be muted when your time is over.

28
00:07:19.266 --> 00:07:20.100
<v Olivia Clark>The Chair preserves order.

29
00:07:20.148 --> 00:07:26.644
<v Unidentified speaker>Disruptive conduct such as shouting, refusing to conclude your testimony when your time is up, or interrupting others' testimony or committee deliberations will not be allowed.

30
00:07:26.980 --> 00:07:28.713
<v Unidentified speaker>If you cause disruption, a warning will be given.

31
00:07:28.793 --> 00:07:30.781
<v Unidentified speaker>Further disruption results in ejection from the meeting.

32
00:07:30.894 --> 00:07:33.877
<v Unidentified speaker>Anyone who fails to leave once ejected is subject to arrest for trespass.

33
00:07:34.101 --> 00:07:36.553
<v Unidentified speaker>Additionally, the committee may take a short recess and reconvene virtually.

34
00:07:37.050 --> 00:07:38.927
<v Unidentified speaker>Your testimony should address the matter being considered.

35
00:07:38.990 --> 00:07:40.754
<v Unidentified speaker>When testifying, state your name for the record.

36
00:07:40.802 --> 00:07:43.319
<v Unidentified speaker>If you're a lobbyist, identify the organization you represent.

37
00:07:43.560 --> 00:07:46.237
<v Unidentified speaker>Virtual testifiers should unmute themselves when the clerk calls your name.

38
00:07:46.430 --> 00:07:46.750
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

39
00:07:47.552 --> 00:07:48.946
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Christopher.

40
00:07:49.011 --> 00:07:54.862
<v Olivia Clark>Colleagues, today we have a very full, meaty agenda, very meaty topics.

41
00:07:55.021 --> 00:07:59.158
<v Olivia Clark>We're going to spend the first part of our meeting discussing the citywide asset management strategy.

42
00:07:59.911 --> 00:08:03.495
<v Olivia Clark>And then move to policy concepts for regulating autonomous vehicles.

43
00:08:04.250 --> 00:08:07.560
<v Olivia Clark>We'll take a break, and we have 2 ordinances from PBOT.

44
00:08:07.624 --> 00:08:19.192
<v Olivia Clark>First is an ordinance to address parking issues in the Lloyd District, Lloyd Event District, and the second ordinance is a real property transfer and an MOU between ODOT and PBOT.

45
00:08:20.012 --> 00:08:25.877
<v Olivia Clark>So with that, um, Diana, could you please call the first item?

46
00:08:27.666 --> 00:08:35.288
<v Unidentified speaker>Item number 1, document number 2026-358, Citywide Asset Management Strategy.

47
00:08:36.754 --> 00:08:40.745
<v Olivia Clark>Colleagues, you know this is our long-anticipated citywide asset management strategy.

48
00:08:41.085 --> 00:08:44.509
<v Olivia Clark>It's here, uh, almost complete.

49
00:08:45.043 --> 00:08:57.658
<v Olivia Clark>Um, I'm delighted to welcome our city's first-ever Chief Asset Management Officer, Emily I know there are some people that want to call your last name Trench, which we think would be very appropriate for Public Works.

50
00:08:58.365 --> 00:09:04.605
<v Olivia Clark>And Emily is here along with Tate White, who's been shepherding this work for the last couple of years.

51
00:09:05.264 --> 00:09:13.945
<v Olivia Clark>And we're going to talk about the initial strategy, keeping in mind that we're anticipating the funding strategy, more information to come to us in December.

52
00:09:14.346 --> 00:09:21.068
<v Olivia Clark>But what I'd first like to do is to invite our City Administrator Raymond Lee to make some opening comments about this topic.

53
00:09:21.405 --> 00:09:22.883
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you so much for being here with us.

54
00:09:24.037 --> 00:09:30.525
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you, Vice President Clark, and just thank the committee for having me this morning to talk about this topic.

55
00:09:31.744 --> 00:09:42.270
<v Unidentified speaker>When we look at some of the core things that are impacting not where we are today only, but where we will be in the future, assets is at the top of that conversation.

56
00:09:43.424 --> 00:09:50.490
<v Unidentified speaker>How we are maintaining what we have today to build a prosperous future is really decisions that are going to be made today.

57
00:09:51.052 --> 00:10:15.969
<v Unidentified speaker>Now, I know this elected body did not put us in the position that we are in today, and I know this elected body, though, will have to make some very hard decisions as it relates to how do we move forward as a city that is investing in its infrastructure and its assets overall, and what are we saying is important to us as a city, and what are our priorities in this.

58
00:10:16.802 --> 00:10:27.524
<v Unidentified speaker>This work that we're doing right now is much bigger than just providing a report to the City Council as it relates to what our assets are, what are the condition that they're in currently.

59
00:10:28.053 --> 00:10:32.259
<v Unidentified speaker>It's really talking about how are we building towards our future as a city.

60
00:10:33.013 --> 00:10:43.013
<v Unidentified speaker>This will be a building block in that larger system of really investing in our infrastructure and our assets overall As a city.

61
00:10:44.072 --> 00:10:48.635
<v Unidentified speaker>There will be future conversations as it relates to potential bond programs.

62
00:10:48.989 --> 00:10:59.192
<v Unidentified speaker>There will be future conversations as it relates to what are we prioritizing within a bond program, because we're so far behind on our assets today.

63
00:10:59.609 --> 00:11:21.880
<v Unidentified speaker>There's no other avenue for us to really explore financially outside of looking at those financial tools to bring us back into a condition that we all see as sufficient for our city of our size and scope and the services that we're delivering to a vast community and really region.

64
00:11:22.379 --> 00:11:30.870
<v Unidentified speaker>'Cause we know we talk about the city of Portland's population roughly around 650,000, but our region population is 2.4 million.

65
00:11:31.688 --> 00:11:42.186
<v Unidentified speaker>And that region still uses this city as a hub for resources and services, and that has a tremendous amount of impact on our resources as a city.

66
00:11:42.779 --> 00:11:56.470
<v Unidentified speaker>One of the biggest things that concerned me when coming into the city and getting a tour— Tate at that time was a part of that tour— and looking at our assets as a whole, it's very concerning, uh, the condition that we're in as a city.

67
00:11:57.047 --> 00:12:10.341
<v Unidentified speaker>Uh, and I can say right now we're not at the position that I would say, from my professional expertise, We need to be as a city as it relates to the investments that we're making in the assets and infrastructure that we have as a city.

68
00:12:10.869 --> 00:12:12.648
<v Unidentified speaker>So I welcome this conversation.

69
00:12:12.759 --> 00:12:15.067
<v Unidentified speaker>I want to be at the forefront of this conversation.

70
00:12:15.163 --> 00:12:41.120
<v Unidentified speaker>This is a part of the reason that we're dedicated, and thank you, Council, for approving the budget to upgrade, uh, this position in the city, uh, so it can have the, uh, the level of expertise but also the hierarchy within the organization to truly have guidance in where we're heading as a city and be able to influence that and be intentional about how that influence happens.

71
00:12:41.248 --> 00:12:47.937
<v Unidentified speaker>So I know this is a commitment from this council as we went through the budgeting process, as we continue to have these conversations.

72
00:12:48.370 --> 00:12:57.788
<v Unidentified speaker>I want you to know it's at the top of my list as well as a city administrator to ensure that we're setting the city up not for only current success but long-term success as well.

73
00:12:58.477 --> 00:13:03.226
<v Unidentified speaker>And I'm sorry, Councilor, I won't be able to run because it is budget season and we got some budget meetings starting off.

74
00:13:03.307 --> 00:13:05.905
<v Unidentified speaker>It seemed like we just ended, but we're back in the mix again.

75
00:13:06.659 --> 00:13:11.360
<v Olivia Clark>Well, thank you so much for being here and really providing us a context for this discussion.

76
00:13:11.456 --> 00:13:15.659
<v Olivia Clark>I appreciate the— your look at the region and the state and really put it in context.

77
00:13:16.269 --> 00:13:20.889
<v Olivia Clark>I'm sure that in your experience, we don't stack up very well against other cities of our size.

78
00:13:20.937 --> 00:13:21.980
<v Olivia Clark>We are so far behind.

79
00:13:22.383 --> 00:13:26.480
<v Olivia Clark>And this is the first issue that this committee took up 2 years ago.

80
00:13:26.721 --> 00:13:27.974
<v Olivia Clark>We knew the gravity of it.

81
00:13:28.489 --> 00:13:32.135
<v Olivia Clark>We had read the auditor's reports about how bad off we are.

82
00:13:32.666 --> 00:13:45.472
<v Olivia Clark>And some of us talk about it all the time in the community because I don't think the community, the people who live in Portland, understand that we own over $80 billion worth of assets and so many of them are on the verge of failure.

83
00:13:46.163 --> 00:13:47.625
<v Olivia Clark>So this is critical.

84
00:13:48.059 --> 00:13:50.221
<v Olivia Clark>So much appreciate your leadership in this.

85
00:13:51.335 --> 00:13:55.254
<v Olivia Clark>So let's call up our 2 folks, Emily and Tate.

86
00:13:55.916 --> 00:14:02.264
<v Olivia Clark>Do you want to come on up and walk us through this, give us a little status report?

87
00:14:02.585 --> 00:14:03.373
<v Olivia Clark>And welcome.

88
00:14:04.514 --> 00:14:05.623
<v Olivia Clark>Good to see you again, Tate.

89
00:14:05.720 --> 00:14:06.506
<v Olivia Clark>And Emily, welcome.

90
00:14:06.941 --> 00:14:09.158
<v Olivia Clark>First time, I think, before a committee.

91
00:14:10.159 --> 00:14:10.714
<v Emily Trish>Thank you very much.

92
00:14:11.960 --> 00:14:12.605
<v Tate White>Good morning.

93
00:14:12.961 --> 00:14:19.616
<v Tate White>Thank you, Chair Clark, Vice Chair Smith, good morning, Councilor Smith and Councilors Koyama Lane, Kanal, and Green.

94
00:14:20.210 --> 00:14:21.621
<v Tate White>My name is Tate White.

95
00:14:21.813 --> 00:14:26.913
<v Tate White>I use she/they pronouns, and I'm the Deputy Director of the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability.

96
00:14:27.827 --> 00:14:37.096
<v Tate White>While I get us set up, I am really thrilled to introduce, um, Chief Asset Management Officer Emily Trish, our first one.

97
00:14:37.370 --> 00:14:39.471
<v Tate White>Do you want to say a few opening remarks, Emily?

98
00:14:39.630 --> 00:14:40.592
<v Emily Trish>Sure, thank you.

99
00:14:41.700 --> 00:14:42.404
<v Emily Trish>Good morning, Council.

100
00:14:42.501 --> 00:14:46.591
<v Emily Trish>My name is Emily Trish, and I am your Chief Asset Management Officer.

101
00:14:46.831 --> 00:14:52.058
<v Emily Trish>I'm very happy to be here joining you in this important mission for infrastructure and for Portland.

102
00:14:52.683 --> 00:14:58.456
<v Emily Trish>I want to thank you for your vision recognizing infrastructure asset management as foundational to Portland's future.

103
00:14:59.498 --> 00:15:05.285
<v Emily Trish>The infrastructure we plan, build, operate, and maintain is more than just a collection of physical assets.

104
00:15:05.495 --> 00:15:11.042
<v Emily Trish>It underpins our economy, it's key to public safety, and it supports the quality of life of every Portlander.

105
00:15:12.067 --> 00:15:25.759
<v Emily Trish>Going forward, we will create a shared approach to managing our assets supporting better-informed decisions, directing resources where they provide the greatest value, and strengthening our ability to deliver for Portland's needs today and for the long term.

106
00:15:26.674 --> 00:15:30.576
<v Emily Trish>So the strategy you'll be receiving this morning is an important step in this process.

107
00:15:31.668 --> 00:15:40.708
<v Emily Trish>I'm looking forward to working with partners across the city to align our efforts, making the best use of our resources, and delivering better outcomes for the people we serve.

108
00:15:41.589 --> 00:15:45.884
<v Emily Trish>Now I'll turn it back over to Deputy Director White to present the asset management strategy.

109
00:15:48.190 --> 00:15:51.520
<v Tate White>All right, thank you, Officer Trish.

110
00:15:52.765 --> 00:16:00.798
<v Tate White>So I'm really proud to present you all the first iteration of the citywide asset management strategy.

111
00:16:01.009 --> 00:16:08.205
<v Tate White>It's Portland's first, and I want to thank the many colleagues who have worked with me on this strategy.

112
00:16:09.345 --> 00:16:19.845
<v Tate White>Before we get into the strategy's vision and objectives, we will review a current state of infrastructure and asset management in Portland.

113
00:16:19.957 --> 00:16:27.969
<v Tate White>We'll review that over— overall, and we'll talk about the many benefits that we can achieve from good practices in asset management.

114
00:16:29.254 --> 00:16:35.466
<v Tate White>We'll then end by talking about governance and implementation, and we really welcome your questions.

115
00:16:37.796 --> 00:16:53.485
<v Tate White>So in short, asset management is a system of tools that allow us to maintain, expand, and improve infrastructure to deliver outcomes to the community, including services and achieving equitable outcomes.

116
00:16:54.626 --> 00:16:58.320
<v Tate White>Assets are physical items that provide a value or a service.

117
00:16:59.203 --> 00:17:08.741
<v Tate White>Our focus is on the built and natural assets gray and green infrastructure that provide important services to our community and the organization.

118
00:17:09.882 --> 00:17:27.640
<v Tate White>When we talk about infrastructure asset management, we are talking about how we take care of roads, parks, bridges, natural systems, community facilities, and the massive urban framework that forms the backbone of public services to our community, because that's really what it's about.

119
00:17:29.500 --> 00:17:41.000
<v Tate White>So the City Asset Managers Group, also known as CAMG for short, has been producing an annual report on the status and condition of the city's infrastructure for over 20 years.

120
00:17:41.113 --> 00:17:42.765
<v Tate White>That's actually in city policy.

121
00:17:44.223 --> 00:17:52.083
<v Tate White>In the June presentation, I mentioned that we are working on this report in tandem with the strategy, and it is provided as an attachment.

122
00:17:53.060 --> 00:17:57.230
<v Tate White>Dozens of professionals and data systems contribute to this annual report.

123
00:17:57.695 --> 00:18:02.536
<v Tate White>And it provides good information on overall portfolio trends and context.

124
00:18:03.865 --> 00:18:12.182
<v Tate White>However, I do want to note that there are inconsistent methods and reliability that underpin the data collection, processing, and reporting.

125
00:18:13.576 --> 00:18:22.775
<v Tate White>The strategy aims to address this variability with stronger data governance and the development of citywide standards and frameworks.

126
00:18:24.387 --> 00:18:31.767
<v Tate White>These will promote accountability and consistency while retaining flexibility for specific asset class differences.

127
00:18:33.000 --> 00:18:41.265
<v Tate White>The Chief Asset Management Officer will be accountable for this reporting going forward in coordination with the many professionals who contribute to it.

128
00:18:44.413 --> 00:19:05.101
<v Tate White>So the City of Portland, as we've been discussing, manages an estimated $82 billion in public infrastructure spanning water, sewer, transportation, parks and natural areas, civic facilities, emergency response equipment, technology systems, cultural venues, and economic development properties.

129
00:19:06.159 --> 00:19:13.984
<v Tate White>The value shown is known as replacement value, which means the capital cost of rebuilding something in today's monetary value.

130
00:19:15.220 --> 00:19:17.209
<v Tate White>$82 billion is a lot of money.

131
00:19:17.609 --> 00:19:21.727
<v Tate White>So even the smaller percentages on here are really significant values.

132
00:19:23.362 --> 00:19:33.819
<v Tate White>We are providing some citywide highlights from the report today, but it is— there's more service area and program-specific information in that report that you can dig into for reference.

133
00:19:36.479 --> 00:19:44.064
<v Tate White>So the chart on this slide shows current asset condition for each program weighted for replacement value.

134
00:19:45.448 --> 00:19:54.894
<v Tate White>Each bar is a bureau or a program, and the colors within that bar represent the percentage of their assets in the condition shown in the legend.

135
00:19:55.808 --> 00:20:02.576
<v Tate White>Without reading it, you can get a good sense of condition profiles by looking at the color distribution.

136
00:20:03.330 --> 00:20:08.576
<v Tate White>Blue and green are good, yellow fair, and orange and red poor and very poor.

137
00:20:09.762 --> 00:20:14.156
<v Tate White>While many asset portfolios are in fair to good condition, Which is of note.

138
00:20:15.118 --> 00:20:28.167
<v Tate White>Others, particularly transportation pavement, parks facilities, public safety facilities, and older cultural venues, have a growing— have growing shares of assets in poor to very poor condition.

139
00:20:29.321 --> 00:20:36.646
<v Tate White>In some instances, a level of poor condition is both expected and strategically managed with a run-to-failure approach.

140
00:20:37.175 --> 00:20:40.960
<v Tate White>We talked about this last time, and I used the example of tires on a car.

141
00:20:41.568 --> 00:20:44.663
<v Tate White>You wouldn't necessarily replace them all when they're in fair condition.

142
00:20:44.711 --> 00:20:51.070
<v Tate White>You'd sort of to wait for them to get to the end of their life cycle because it makes sense from a cost standpoint.

143
00:20:55.759 --> 00:21:10.934
<v Tate White>So across all bureaus, annual and forecasted 10-year capital gaps continue to grow as aging assets meet inflation, stricter regulatory requirements, seismic vulnerability, and accelerating climate impacts.

144
00:21:11.730 --> 00:21:22.909
<v Tate White>Most of these gaps are related to maintenance or replacement needs, and gaps from the less mature groups are likely underestimated compared to the more mature utility bureaus.

145
00:21:25.270 --> 00:21:32.888
<v Tate White>The graph on this slide shows each bureau's 10-year capital funding gap as a percentage of that group's overall asset value.

146
00:21:33.853 --> 00:21:41.567
<v Tate White>This perspective is important because it shows the significance of each bureau's reported funding gap relative to the size of their portfolio.

147
00:21:45.071 --> 00:21:57.212
<v Tate White>Resulting, resulting failures of assets from lack of investment can challenge service reliability, safety, access, and livability for Portlanders.

148
00:21:58.051 --> 00:22:06.512
<v Tate White>If we don't invest in asset management, we are likely to see exponentially increasing closures and decreases in services to to the community.

149
00:22:07.930 --> 00:22:16.723
<v Tate White>We risk catastrophic failures of major assets like bridges, with escalating negative impacts to public safety and economic development.

150
00:22:19.670 --> 00:22:40.186
<v Tate White>Failures of some assets could lead to major service disruptions and threats to public health and environmental quality, and continued deterioration of amenities will have cumulative negative impacts on community experience and quality of life.

151
00:22:41.400 --> 00:22:46.518
<v Tate White>Issues will continue to be pushed off on future generations and become more and more costly.

152
00:22:50.798 --> 00:22:58.174
<v Tate White>Early intervention in an asset's deterioration cycle helps prevent these more significant and costly failures.

153
00:22:59.440 --> 00:23:04.132
<v Tate White>Asset management can be used to achieve efficiencies and cost savings.

154
00:23:05.029 --> 00:23:12.453
<v Tate White>For example, every $1 of planned maintenance can avoid roughly $5 to $10 of reactive repair.

155
00:23:13.528 --> 00:23:18.211
<v Tate White>Higher upfront costs can produce substantially lower lifetime costs.

156
00:23:18.996 --> 00:23:30.252
<v Tate White>The figures on the slide are intended to provide a sense of relative scale, and actual values depend on asset class, maintenance, maintenance strategy, and failure mode.

157
00:23:31.007 --> 00:23:35.608
<v Tate White>The key point is that addressing the investment gap is not simply a revenue problem.

158
00:23:36.058 --> 00:23:37.871
<v Tate White>It is a systems problem as well.

159
00:23:39.185 --> 00:23:40.484
<v Tate White>But we can do something about it.

160
00:23:41.351 --> 00:23:56.073
<v Tate White>Managing for risk, focusing on infrastructure services and outcomes, prioritizing care for what we own over building new, funding maintenance, and so on are all opportunities to chip away at a challenge that's compounded over time.

161
00:23:57.404 --> 00:24:09.603
<v Tate White>Implementing the objectives and actions of the strategy will provide improved systems and tools to better understand the risk and value trade-offs of prioritizing one gap over another.

162
00:24:10.967 --> 00:24:14.000
<v Tate White>And so I'm going to pass it to Emily for this slide.

163
00:24:14.417 --> 00:24:14.673
<v Emily Trish>Great.

164
00:24:14.722 --> 00:24:20.146
<v Emily Trish>Well, uh, Council, as part of our annual asset status and condition reporting, we like to share some accomplishments.

165
00:24:20.355 --> 00:24:33.517
<v Emily Trish>And also relevant to the work products before you, uh, we want to share, uh, some initiatives going on across the organization, and these are aligned directly with City's financial— City Financial Policy 2.19 on asset management.

166
00:24:34.463 --> 00:24:42.633
<v Emily Trish>Solutions, efficiencies, and innovations like these will be amplified and extended through implementation of the strategy that we'll be discussing in a moment.

167
00:24:43.386 --> 00:24:51.202
<v Emily Trish>This list is, of course, not exhaustive, but merely representative of the great work that asset managers across the organization are doing all the time.

168
00:24:51.978 --> 00:25:06.590
<v Emily Trish>So clockwise from the upper left, I wanted to highlight the Water Bureau's efforts to predict future water main failures by developing renewal rate recommendations, managing future service levels.

169
00:25:07.594 --> 00:25:11.859
<v Emily Trish>The data in this chart is based on failure rates and replacement rates of Portland pipes.

170
00:25:13.536 --> 00:25:21.124
<v Emily Trish>In the innovation category, BES is rolling out this Fall, AI pipe defect grading.

171
00:25:21.316 --> 00:25:28.471
<v Emily Trish>And so this is utilizing technology to identify some defects that we can address before they become larger failures.

172
00:25:30.170 --> 00:25:35.740
<v Emily Trish>The facilities team is currently working to implement the capital planning module in FacilityForce.

173
00:25:35.854 --> 00:25:41.407
<v Emily Trish>And so this will help to optimize their capital portfolio.

174
00:25:42.538 --> 00:25:47.334
<v Emily Trish>On the bottom right, you're familiar with some of the financial tools recently rolled out and approved through council.

175
00:25:47.398 --> 00:25:47.593
<v Emily Trish>Thank you.

176
00:25:49.642 --> 00:25:54.474
<v Emily Trish>Through the passage of the Transportation Utility Fee and the Street Damage Restoration Fee.

177
00:25:55.727 --> 00:26:02.904
<v Emily Trish>This includes funding also to help with the sidewalk improvements as part of the Sidewalk Improvement and Paving Program, the SIP.

178
00:26:04.237 --> 00:26:17.483
<v Emily Trish>And then finally, I want to call out the, the work with both PBOT and Parks and Rec in partnership with the Bureau of Transportation implementing the same updated cloud version of Maximo, which is an enterprise asset management tool.

179
00:26:17.564 --> 00:26:17.676
<v Emily Trish>Thank you.

180
00:26:18.384 --> 00:26:24.037
<v Emily Trish>And this will improve the interoperability and provide lower long-term support costs over alternatives.

181
00:26:24.182 --> 00:26:29.327
<v Emily Trish>So we're making progress all the time, and we hope to ramp it up as part of the strategy implementation.

182
00:26:29.996 --> 00:26:30.420
<v Emily Trish>Back to you, Tate.

183
00:26:32.462 --> 00:26:33.574
<v Tate White>Thank you, Officer Trish.

184
00:26:34.477 --> 00:26:46.144
<v Tate White>So this slide serves as a reminder of the work dozens of people across the city engaged in to develop the citywide asset management strategy that we're presenting today.

185
00:26:49.577 --> 00:26:55.798
<v Tate White>I'm going to read out the vision to give you all time to absorb it, but I first want to note that this is really forward-looking.

186
00:26:56.476 --> 00:26:57.752
<v Tate White>It's more long-term.

187
00:26:58.253 --> 00:27:09.340
<v Tate White>The objectives and the actions of the strategy we envision will be implemented sooner, and we see this as a living document that will be revisited and updated over time.

188
00:27:11.500 --> 00:27:13.684
<v Tate White>So getting back to the vision, it's 2035.

189
00:27:14.922 --> 00:27:17.102
<v Tate White>And what, what do we want to see?

190
00:27:18.048 --> 00:27:36.723
<v Tate White>Portland at that time will deliver reliable, equitable services promoted or supported by mature integrated asset management systems where decisions are data-informed and transparent, reduce risk, and deliver value for community over an asset's life cycle.

191
00:27:37.846 --> 00:27:47.556
<v Tate White>Portlanders will enjoy dependable services that meet community expectations and support positive social, economic, and environmental outcomes.

192
00:27:50.346 --> 00:28:05.239
<v Tate White>So the first paragraph of this vision is rather internally focused, and that's because the strategy is really focused on getting the organization better equipped to manage assets more effectively across bureaus.

193
00:28:06.306 --> 00:28:15.111
<v Tate White>However, the strategy also considers how we would better integrate equity and community impacts and level of service planning, analysis, and decision-making.

194
00:28:15.320 --> 00:28:22.952
<v Tate White>So that second sentence connects asset management practices to responsibly providing services to the community.

195
00:28:25.567 --> 00:28:28.998
<v Tate White>So here's a collection of the strategy's 6 objectives.

196
00:28:29.515 --> 00:28:32.217
<v Tate White>We will be walking through a slide for each one.

197
00:28:35.000 --> 00:28:38.616
<v Tate White>So Objective 1 focuses on establishing asset management governance.

198
00:28:39.106 --> 00:28:47.009
<v Tate White>And organizational capacity, which is considered a critical immediate action to serve as a catalyst for the other objectives.

199
00:28:48.602 --> 00:28:55.667
<v Tate White>We will talk about governance later in the presentation, but we have had a big win already with a Chief Asset Management Officer.

200
00:28:57.357 --> 00:29:08.950
<v Tate White>This objective also includes actions to build organizational capacity, asset management culture, and competence through training and defining a citywide level of service framework.

201
00:29:09.759 --> 00:29:25.214
<v Tate White>Supporting strategy language asserts that level of service should be connected to community outcomes, cost of service, and budget decisions so that the city commits to deliver— what the city commits to delivering is matched by the resources required to sustain it.

202
00:29:28.218 --> 00:29:34.772
<v Tate White>Objective 2 is about supporting decisions through the identification of common asset data elements.

203
00:29:35.383 --> 00:29:47.634
<v Tate White>Intentional data governance, governance, data standards, system design, and integration, aligning these to strategic and operation needs as well as risk priorities.

204
00:29:48.532 --> 00:30:00.205
<v Tate White>Critical to this work is developing and maintaining a citywide asset register to have a single source of truth for tracking, managing, and accounting for physical assets throughout their life cycle.

205
00:30:01.137 --> 00:30:10.479
<v Tate White>The Chief Asset Management Officer is envisioned to lead this work, with asset owners being responsible for organizing their data into the standards created.

206
00:30:12.440 --> 00:30:21.489
<v Tate White>The second action of defining data stewards will help with effective implementation and maintaining this register over time.

207
00:30:23.012 --> 00:30:29.144
<v Tate White>Objective 3 focuses on implementing objective citywide frameworks for investment prioritization.

208
00:30:30.138 --> 00:30:44.855
<v Tate White>The first action, to develop a simple shared method for evaluating risk, values, and long-term needs that every service area can use regardless of staff expertise, has been identified as a critical immediate action.

209
00:30:46.188 --> 00:31:07.047
<v Tate White>Additional actions include creating guidance for asset onboarding, decommissioning, evaluating renewal and return on investment, Establishing value-based decision criteria around levels of service, funding, and decision trade-offs, and developing a citywide investment prioritization model to help prioritize citywide resources.

210
00:31:07.806 --> 00:31:08.855
<v Olivia Clark>Excuse me.

211
00:31:10.372 --> 00:31:15.849
<v Tate White>The strategy goes into more detail about actionable next steps to achieve these objectives.

212
00:31:16.432 --> 00:31:26.445
<v Tate White>Critical to this one is recognizing the various factors that should be considered to define trade-offs and assess risk so informed decisions can be made.

213
00:31:27.599 --> 00:31:32.846
<v Tate White>Decision-making criteria is a recommended tool to provide guidance for these critical choices.

214
00:31:35.435 --> 00:31:41.104
<v Tate White>Objective 4 states that decisions should be grounded in life cycle reality, equity, and community need.

215
00:31:41.957 --> 00:31:48.454
<v Tate White>As discussed in Objective 1, it's important to connect service commitments to life cycle costs and maintenance funding.

216
00:31:49.451 --> 00:31:56.747
<v Tate White>Adopting a common citywide equity framework for asset and service decisions at a citywide level is another action.

217
00:31:57.755 --> 00:32:03.974
<v Tate White>And finally, integrating this framework into the previous objective's investment prioritization model.

218
00:32:06.064 --> 00:32:12.325
<v Tate White>Objective 5 calls for incorporating seismic and climate mitigation and adaptation into decision-making.

219
00:32:13.356 --> 00:32:24.404
<v Tate White>Actions include adopting resilience screening and an evaluation framework that allows bureaus to assess seismic and climate risks across infrastructure assets.

220
00:32:24.903 --> 00:32:28.301
<v Tate White>This will promote consistency and inform decision criteria.

221
00:32:29.248 --> 00:32:53.863
<v Tate White>Establishing a scalable citywide method for applying seismic and climate change information to prioritization is also included and should be incorporated into the previous with various initiatives like the climate change risk assessment and action plan happening right now, we have the opportunity to integrate a resilience lens into all city assessments and plans.

222
00:32:56.299 --> 00:33:04.897
<v Tate White>Okay, the final objective— we're almost there— is focused on earning public trust through meaningful engagement, performance management, and reporting.

223
00:33:05.824 --> 00:33:30.519
<v Tate White>A key action to help guide this is the establishment of citywide community engagement expectations, which include defining minimum standards for engagement on asset and service decisions, applying best practices to promote inclusive, representative, and transparent engagement, utilizing tools like effective communication and language access to define levels of service.

224
00:33:31.806 --> 00:33:36.454
<v Tate White>And closing the feedback loop through continuous engagement that explains trade-offs.

225
00:33:37.259 --> 00:33:46.532
<v Tate White>The other actions to achieve this objective focus on developing systems to track performance and be transparent with the community about service outcomes.

226
00:33:49.731 --> 00:33:55.491
<v Tate White>So we will start to close by looking back to the first objective on asset management governance.

227
00:33:56.233 --> 00:34:00.575
<v Tate White>This chart shows a recommendation for what that could look like moving forward to successfully implement the strategy.

228
00:34:03.715 --> 00:34:15.733
<v Tate White>The Chief Asset Management Officer will hold authority and accountability for developing and implementing citywide asset management standards, processes, and system decisions.

229
00:34:18.639 --> 00:34:36.226
<v Tate White>The Executive Steering Committee that was made up of DCAs for strategy development would shift to being made up of directors of asset-owning and enabling bureaus to have critical seats to advise on and make key decisions for how to implement the objectives and actions of the strategy.

230
00:34:37.599 --> 00:34:46.201
<v Tate White>Everyone has a role to play in infrastructure management for the city, and we look forward to working together to deliver on this work.

231
00:34:46.911 --> 00:34:49.458
<v Tate White>And I'm going to pass it to Officer Trish to close.

232
00:34:51.260 --> 00:34:51.469
<v Emily Trish>Great.

233
00:34:51.532 --> 00:34:53.833
<v Emily Trish>So looking forward, some next steps for you.

234
00:34:54.188 --> 00:35:02.588
<v Emily Trish>Vice President Clark already indicated that there's a financial strategy that will be coming before you targeting winter of 2026, uh, with CFO Berry.

235
00:35:03.489 --> 00:35:13.596
<v Emily Trish>Um, I, uh, plan to come before the larger council, uh, in the spring to offer some refinements and some details of implementation activities, uh, related to this strategy.

236
00:35:14.576 --> 00:35:22.434
<v Emily Trish>Um, and part of that, uh, will be, um, working on risk framework, uh, service level targets, and evaluating for infrastructure performance.

237
00:35:22.690 --> 00:35:25.503
<v Emily Trish>And so those were some of the objectives you heard about a moment ago.

238
00:35:26.146 --> 00:35:29.728
<v Emily Trish>Looking at our decision framework and where our greatest areas of risk are.

239
00:35:30.099 --> 00:35:34.838
<v Emily Trish>And so we look forward to continuing that conversation with you and answering any questions you have today.

240
00:35:35.465 --> 00:35:35.980
<v Emily Trish>Thank you very much.

241
00:35:36.510 --> 00:35:36.766
<v Loretta Smith>Great.

242
00:35:36.992 --> 00:35:38.342
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you both for the presentation.

243
00:35:38.438 --> 00:35:39.675
<v Olivia Clark>I know we have some questions.

244
00:35:39.724 --> 00:35:43.838
<v Olivia Clark>We've got about 10, 15 minutes available for a discussion here.

245
00:35:43.918 --> 00:35:47.469
<v Olivia Clark>And, you know, I'm very anxious to get what I call the list.

246
00:35:47.614 --> 00:35:47.773
<v Olivia Clark>Right.

247
00:35:48.239 --> 00:35:49.155
<v Olivia Clark>I want the list.

248
00:35:49.300 --> 00:35:51.679
<v Olivia Clark>I want to know what's at greatest risk.

249
00:35:52.016 --> 00:35:53.059
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, by each bureau.

250
00:35:53.157 --> 00:35:56.239
<v Olivia Clark>But this has got some great information, and I really appreciate it.

251
00:35:56.914 --> 00:35:59.838
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, Councilor Smith, you want to kick off the discussion?

252
00:36:00.047 --> 00:36:01.043
<v Loretta Smith>Uh, yes, thank you.

253
00:36:01.733 --> 00:36:02.407
<v Loretta Smith>Welcome, Trish.

254
00:36:02.697 --> 00:36:07.273
<v Loretta Smith>I, um, appreciate you, and you got a big job ahead of you.

255
00:36:08.077 --> 00:36:08.992
<v Loretta Smith>Uh, a couple things.

256
00:36:09.041 --> 00:36:12.043
<v Loretta Smith>I'm, I'm like the, um, the chair.

257
00:36:12.815 --> 00:36:33.541
<v Loretta Smith>I was fully expecting, with the time that it took to get to this vision, I was fully expecting to see a registry I was expecting to see a spreadsheet that equaled the $82 billion, that had a headline of each bureau and how much they had and what it was specifically.

258
00:36:34.364 --> 00:36:43.853
<v Loretta Smith>And I guess it is, it is the style of the city because the budget office, when they talk to us about things, they talk in percentages.

259
00:36:44.594 --> 00:36:46.572
<v Loretta Smith>And I don't want to know what 82% is.

260
00:36:46.862 --> 00:36:48.197
<v Loretta Smith>I want to know what 82% is.

261
00:36:48.902 --> 00:36:51.293
<v Loretta Smith>And what the dollar value is.

262
00:36:51.827 --> 00:37:02.094
<v Loretta Smith>If you can say only 20% of your assets are, are workable, I want to know what 20% is in condition, in great condition and operational.

263
00:37:02.789 --> 00:37:40.954
<v Loretta Smith>So for me, this is— this was kind of underwhelming to me because I was— I had a big expectation of having a, a list, a registry with, with Um, and I'm not so wedded to spreadsheets, but I, I expected to see something that would look like an $82 billion book that I would be able to include the status of each, of each of the, um, assets and how much would it take to get operational in the, in the, in the good, to the good.

264
00:37:41.101 --> 00:37:41.327
<v Loretta Smith>Mm-hmm.

265
00:37:41.686 --> 00:37:42.655
<v Loretta Smith>For better than good.

266
00:37:43.219 --> 00:37:45.998
<v Loretta Smith>And so for me, I still don't know any more than I know now.

267
00:37:46.224 --> 00:37:49.130
<v Loretta Smith>I don't know what you all are considering an asset.

268
00:37:49.777 --> 00:37:51.244
<v Loretta Smith>You haven't identified it.

269
00:37:52.018 --> 00:37:54.501
<v Loretta Smith>I don't know what street our asset is on.

270
00:37:54.936 --> 00:37:57.257
<v Loretta Smith>I wanted to see, this is Asset 3 in PBOT.

271
00:37:57.596 --> 00:38:05.152
<v Loretta Smith>We have 10, uh, trucks, 5 that are operational, and then they're going to go away.

272
00:38:05.554 --> 00:38:25.362
<v Loretta Smith>And I, I, I just had a different expectation since this— and I know you just got here, Trish, But it— I, I see, um, DCA, uh, Williams has come to the table, but I— this is just a long list of visions that I have about a whole lot of stuff.

273
00:38:25.509 --> 00:38:26.507
<v Loretta Smith>I was expecting more.

274
00:38:27.617 --> 00:38:28.018
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

275
00:38:28.581 --> 00:38:29.835
<v Millicent Williams>If I may, uh, good morning.

276
00:38:29.882 --> 00:38:32.710
<v Millicent Williams>Millicent Williams, Interim Deputy City Administrator for Public Works.

277
00:38:32.903 --> 00:38:35.378
<v Millicent Williams>Thank you very much for your question, Councilor Smith.

278
00:38:35.880 --> 00:38:42.297
<v Millicent Williams>Uh, we anticipated that, uh, this committee would have concerns along the lines that you've mentioned.

279
00:38:42.523 --> 00:38:45.987
<v Millicent Williams>And Emily Trich, her first name is Emily.

280
00:38:46.291 --> 00:38:46.612
<v Millicent Williams>Yeah.

281
00:38:46.693 --> 00:38:56.028
<v Millicent Williams>So she and I have talked extensively, as well as had conversations with Tate about the expectations for today.

282
00:38:56.974 --> 00:39:05.076
<v Millicent Williams>We can assure you that when Emily comes before this body in January, you will have a collection of data.

283
00:39:05.860 --> 00:39:07.336
<v Millicent Williams>It will come in many forms.

284
00:39:07.465 --> 00:39:26.382
<v Millicent Williams>Some of it will be lists, some of it will be maps, some of it will be dashboarded information that she will be able to provide for this body so that there's a level of comfort about not just the list of assets, the general condition of the assets, but where those assets are.

285
00:39:26.896 --> 00:39:27.105
<v Millicent Williams>Absolutely.

286
00:39:27.152 --> 00:39:36.788
<v Millicent Williams>That will help to inform what the city administrator was discussing regarding how we will get to the request of a potential bond in the future.

287
00:39:37.092 --> 00:39:41.731
<v Millicent Williams>We can't do that unless we have integrity in the information and data that we have.

288
00:39:42.326 --> 00:39:47.623
<v Millicent Williams>And so the commitment from the administration is to ensure that we have that information.

289
00:39:48.090 --> 00:39:50.465
<v Millicent Williams>And frankly, a lot of that already exists.

290
00:39:50.755 --> 00:39:58.235
<v Millicent Williams>It's just in various and sundry forms that make it a little challenging to bring together.

291
00:39:58.541 --> 00:40:00.034
<v Millicent Williams>Yeah, it's decentralized.

292
00:40:00.259 --> 00:40:11.208
<v Millicent Williams>So, you know, we have We have over 1,000 capital projects that we could provide, but that doesn't tell you— that doesn't provide the narrative that you're wanting to know.

293
00:40:11.369 --> 00:40:14.692
<v Millicent Williams>I can tell you right now, PBOT has 225 capital projects.

294
00:40:14.996 --> 00:40:16.025
<v Millicent Williams>I can tell you where they are.

295
00:40:16.266 --> 00:40:18.706
<v Millicent Williams>That doesn't speak to the general condition of those assets.

296
00:40:18.769 --> 00:40:22.559
<v Millicent Williams>And so that's the work that we anticipate will begin in earnest.

297
00:40:23.186 --> 00:40:25.931
<v Millicent Williams>The asset managers from across the city have been working very hard.

298
00:40:26.300 --> 00:40:34.789
<v Millicent Williams>But again, without having that central point of coordination that is tasked with and charged with ensuring that there is that strategy.

299
00:40:35.525 --> 00:40:43.175
<v Millicent Williams>We have not been able to show up in ways that I think not just you councilors are expecting, but also that the public would expect.

300
00:40:43.239 --> 00:40:46.927
<v Millicent Williams>And so I know that the next several months will be spent working on that.

301
00:40:47.632 --> 00:40:56.485
<v Loretta Smith>And I think it would be helpful, because we've been in cut exercises, to see, do we have multiple vans?

302
00:40:56.628 --> 00:41:05.009
<v Loretta Smith>I know every Every month or however they take it out, money is taken out of my account for facilities for cars.

303
00:41:05.442 --> 00:41:07.092
<v Loretta Smith>I have not— I have yet to use one.

304
00:41:08.150 --> 00:41:10.295
<v Loretta Smith>I don't know what kind of cars you all have.

305
00:41:10.409 --> 00:41:15.856
<v Loretta Smith>I sometimes— I see those— I used to see those cars that say the City That Works or something like that.

306
00:41:16.336 --> 00:41:17.858
<v Loretta Smith>I have no idea.

307
00:41:18.900 --> 00:41:35.403
<v Loretta Smith>I do know I've been in one of PBOT's trucks, but I'm trying to figure out if we can also, as you're looking at this, Create an equity lens so that our assets, where they are, so that we know.

308
00:41:35.547 --> 00:41:46.413
<v Loretta Smith>And, and, and I expect to see something like, you know, we have 25 parks in District 1, and here, here are the things that need to be updated in these parks.

309
00:41:46.460 --> 00:41:48.800
<v Loretta Smith>And those are the kind of things that I, I need to see.

310
00:41:49.329 --> 00:42:22.009
<v Loretta Smith>And if we're going to do public-private partnerships like they did over at Sellwood House, You know, what looks to be as an opportunity to do a public-private— I don't want to privatize the city, but I just want to see if there are ways in which, if there are assets that we need to, that are not being used, that maybe we should consider either selling them, putting them so that we can upgrade other assets that we really need to keep in play, those kind of things.

311
00:42:22.057 --> 00:42:23.626
<v Loretta Smith>That's That's what I'm thinking about.

312
00:42:24.237 --> 00:42:53.594
<v Loretta Smith>But at any rate, um, I will also be talking to you and setting up a time to talk to you, uh, Interim DCA Williams, in regards to, um, how we, uh— there's— we have a place setter bill in the, in the legislature that would, um, identify— that would allow cities who have surplus properties to, uh, rezone them For other things, particularly housing.

313
00:42:55.315 --> 00:43:01.076
<v Loretta Smith>And I think that we can't create any more land, but we have to repurpose the land that we do have.

314
00:43:01.141 --> 00:43:02.108
<v Loretta Smith>It's not being used.

315
00:43:02.172 --> 00:43:03.447
<v Loretta Smith>If it needs it, if it's a brownfield.

316
00:43:04.152 --> 00:43:05.202
<v Loretta Smith>And that's the other thing I want to know.

317
00:43:05.510 --> 00:43:08.320
<v Loretta Smith>How many of these assets are brownfields?

318
00:43:09.467 --> 00:43:11.875
<v Loretta Smith>And by district and those kinds of things.

319
00:43:12.246 --> 00:43:15.121
<v Loretta Smith>So that is where my head is at.

320
00:43:15.525 --> 00:43:17.349
<v Loretta Smith>I appreciate you all coming up with the vision.

321
00:43:17.398 --> 00:43:17.512
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

322
00:43:17.577 --> 00:43:27.003
<v Loretta Smith>And that gives you the starting point so that you But the registry, a spreadsheet, I guess I am just a spreadsheet girl.

323
00:43:27.068 --> 00:43:32.900
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Smith, I appreciate your channeling my frustration as well.

324
00:43:32.965 --> 00:43:33.724
<v Olivia Clark>So I appreciate that.

325
00:43:34.094 --> 00:43:38.505
<v Olivia Clark>And I think it's good that we give folks feedback, but we only have about 10 more minutes left on this.

326
00:43:38.967 --> 00:43:41.364
<v Olivia Clark>So if it's okay with you, I'd like to move on to Councilor Green.

327
00:43:43.159 --> 00:43:43.976
<v Mitch Green>Thank you, Chair Clark.

328
00:43:45.840 --> 00:43:46.061
<v Mitch Green>Thank you.

329
00:43:46.454 --> 00:43:47.034
<v Mitch Green>Welcome, Emily.

330
00:43:47.150 --> 00:43:49.650
<v Mitch Green>We're excited to have you on board.

331
00:43:49.972 --> 00:43:52.809
<v Mitch Green>Tate, thank you for your ongoing service to this project.

332
00:43:53.275 --> 00:43:54.364
<v Mitch Green>I just have one question.

333
00:43:54.461 --> 00:43:58.373
<v Mitch Green>So at the very last slide, you mentioned a risk framework that's forthcoming.

334
00:43:59.192 --> 00:44:01.389
<v Mitch Green>I'd like to hear a little bit more about that.

335
00:44:01.436 --> 00:44:06.856
<v Mitch Green>And specifically, are you going to be engaging in the ISO 31000 standard to guide that?

336
00:44:07.610 --> 00:44:09.326
<v Emily Trish>Thank you very much for that question.

337
00:44:09.391 --> 00:44:10.753
<v Emily Trish>And you're speaking my language, right?

338
00:44:10.849 --> 00:44:16.427
<v Emily Trish>So the International Standards Organization has several standards relevant to infrastructure asset management.

339
00:44:16.829 --> 00:44:21.170
<v Emily Trish>And yes, we will be working off of the standards of ISO.

340
00:44:21.315 --> 00:44:33.155
<v Emily Trish>We'll also be looking at GASB 33, for those keeping score at home, and also looking at the commitments, the policy and standards we have here within the City of Portland.

341
00:44:33.668 --> 00:44:52.922
<v Emily Trish>My intention is to engage stakeholders inside and outside of the city because the way people are interacting with our infrastructure and how that helps them create that, uh, the safety, the new business, the affordable housing and development is so critical to what I understand, uh, the city is wanting to, um, become.

342
00:44:53.708 --> 00:44:55.025
<v Emily Trish>Uh, so you'll be hearing about that.

343
00:44:55.090 --> 00:45:13.644
<v Emily Trish>That will tie in nicely to the prioritization framework or the investment framework, uh, and, um, uh, as well as the, uh, equity, uh, resilience and the other goals we have of the organization that you will help, um, determine and dictate how we Pour the projects into the machine and what comes out the other side.

344
00:45:14.094 --> 00:45:14.739
<v Mitch Green>I appreciate that.

345
00:45:14.802 --> 00:45:15.125
<v Mitch Green>Thank you.

346
00:45:15.286 --> 00:45:23.762
<v Mitch Green>And, you know, for folks watching along, I'm so obsessed with this because we can't do all of the projects.

347
00:45:23.827 --> 00:45:31.228
<v Mitch Green>Like, even if we're to go out and float a bond, it's— the scale of it is so large that we have to figure out which ones to do first.

348
00:45:31.751 --> 00:45:36.677
<v Mitch Green>And the way you do that is applying sort of a risk lens to be like, what would be the impact of failure?

349
00:45:36.972 --> 00:45:39.059
<v Mitch Green>So it's not just like, will this— is this old?

350
00:45:39.139 --> 00:45:40.039
<v Mitch Green>Is it— does it need help?

351
00:45:40.103 --> 00:45:43.425
<v Mitch Green>But it's like, if this fails, does this then create cascading conditions?

352
00:45:43.474 --> 00:45:47.246
<v Mitch Green>So sounds like that's exactly the, the lens and frame that you're taking.

353
00:45:47.311 --> 00:45:47.391
<v Mitch Green>I'm—.

354
00:45:47.503 --> 00:45:49.751
<v Mitch Green>I'll, I'll look forward to seeing that in January.

355
00:45:49.815 --> 00:45:53.686
<v Mitch Green>And, um, thanks for, uh, uh, thanks for the work on it.

356
00:45:53.750 --> 00:45:53.990
<v Olivia Clark>Thanks.

357
00:45:54.135 --> 00:45:54.489
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

358
00:45:54.568 --> 00:45:56.672
<v Olivia Clark>I think we're all, we're all itching to get there.

359
00:45:57.586 --> 00:45:58.373
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, Councilor Kanal.

360
00:45:59.047 --> 00:46:00.317
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Chair Clark.

361
00:46:00.557 --> 00:46:02.034
<v Sameer Kanal>Uh, thanks and welcome to the city, Emily.

362
00:46:02.324 --> 00:46:06.208
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, Thanks as well for being here, DCA Williams and Tate.

363
00:46:06.255 --> 00:46:17.264
<v Sameer Kanal>I think if there's some behind-the-scenes thing that has not been worked on for a long time at the level that it needs to be, and now someone's working on it, 9 times outta 10, I see your name attached to it, Tate.

364
00:46:17.409 --> 00:46:20.731
<v Sameer Kanal>And I really appreciate that about your time here.

365
00:46:21.340 --> 00:46:22.978
<v Sameer Kanal>I have a couple questions about 2 slides.

366
00:46:23.027 --> 00:46:24.824
<v Sameer Kanal>Can we go to the slide with all the bar charts?

367
00:46:26.172 --> 00:46:32.081
<v Sameer Kanal>And first, just verifying that the PP in the, In the header there is Prosper Portland.

368
00:46:32.932 --> 00:46:33.094
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay.

369
00:46:33.237 --> 00:46:33.431
<v Sameer Kanal>Yes.

370
00:46:33.817 --> 00:46:35.889
<v Sameer Kanal>So at some point we should have that, that one.

371
00:46:36.050 --> 00:46:36.485
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah.

372
00:46:37.512 --> 00:46:39.965
<v Sameer Kanal>So I had a question here.

373
00:46:40.871 --> 00:46:42.778
<v Sameer Kanal>So PF&R's got its own column.

374
00:46:43.637 --> 00:46:46.192
<v Sameer Kanal>Fleet and Facilities manages PPB precincts, right?

375
00:46:46.530 --> 00:46:47.695
<v Sameer Kanal>So they'd be included in that.

376
00:46:47.760 --> 00:46:49.998
<v Sameer Kanal>I know North Precinct is in dire need of some work.

377
00:46:50.239 --> 00:46:50.722
<v Tate White>Correct.

378
00:46:50.818 --> 00:46:51.012
<v Tate White>Correct.

379
00:46:51.061 --> 00:46:51.222
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay.

380
00:46:52.815 --> 00:46:54.601
<v Sameer Kanal>So I guess this highlights a question.

381
00:46:54.827 --> 00:47:06.547
<v Sameer Kanal>Is there a long-term plan of splitting up this sort of data by the type of asset instead of bureau ownership as we simultaneously move to having everything owned by a city instead of 27 bureaus in a trench coat?

382
00:47:07.581 --> 00:47:17.478
<v Emily Trish>Yes, so very much so by strategic priority and by some of the thematic areas that we're seeing.

383
00:47:17.577 --> 00:47:22.525
<v Emily Trish>I'm already starting to get a sense from folks about what that might look like, and that could inform a future bond.

384
00:47:23.226 --> 00:47:25.166
<v Sameer Kanal>Great, that makes sense.

385
00:47:25.246 --> 00:47:28.965
<v Sameer Kanal>And I'd love to talk about FYRE uniquely and separately at some point.

386
00:47:29.014 --> 00:47:38.311
<v Sameer Kanal>That probably cannot be now because there's also the broader conversation about where our assets are located.

387
00:47:38.456 --> 00:47:47.561
<v Sameer Kanal>Obviously, we talk about East Portland and that's a huge part of it, but also CEI Hub and some other locations there and west of the railroad cut in North Portland as well.

388
00:47:48.619 --> 00:47:49.663
<v Sameer Kanal>So that's one piece.

389
00:47:50.081 --> 00:47:54.320
<v Sameer Kanal>I also would like to go to the slides about Objective 6 and engagement.

390
00:47:54.432 --> 00:48:04.356
<v Sameer Kanal>And I just wanted to kind of understand if you're breaking this apart, because I think it's a little different if we're talking about engaging with people about upkeep versus actual change.

391
00:48:04.934 --> 00:48:08.981
<v Sameer Kanal>So if a, you know, it's a short-term inconvenience if your road's being repaved, right?

392
00:48:09.045 --> 00:48:11.295
<v Sameer Kanal>But it will go back to normal after that.

393
00:48:11.375 --> 00:48:11.438
<v Sameer Kanal>Right.

394
00:48:11.615 --> 00:48:12.739
<v Sameer Kanal>I think that's different.

395
00:48:13.045 --> 00:48:15.663
<v Sameer Kanal>And the engagement standard is probably different as well.

396
00:48:16.353 --> 00:48:21.009
<v Sameer Kanal>Than if you're taking a 2-lane road and making it 1 lane in either direction as part of this.

397
00:48:21.090 --> 00:48:23.530
<v Sameer Kanal>And that can be something you do at the same time.

398
00:48:24.284 --> 00:48:32.827
<v Sameer Kanal>So I just, I wanted to just get an understanding of sort of how are you working through that and how are you establishing the standards on that?

399
00:48:32.891 --> 00:48:41.257
<v Sameer Kanal>Because I think PBOT has been criticized over time, in particular on engagement, for being deep but narrow.

400
00:48:41.320 --> 00:48:41.385
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah.

401
00:48:42.523 --> 00:48:47.159
<v Sameer Kanal>So like the people who live on the road, but not the people who drive on the road every day.

402
00:48:48.280 --> 00:48:55.978
<v Sameer Kanal>And I think that's, you know, a unique problem because there are other bureaus that aren't even getting the acknowledgement of the depth of their engagement.

403
00:48:56.139 --> 00:48:58.079
<v Olivia Clark>Do you mind if I intervene at this point?

404
00:48:58.159 --> 00:48:59.490
<v Olivia Clark>Those are great questions.

405
00:48:59.603 --> 00:49:00.436
<v Olivia Clark>I really appreciate them.

406
00:49:01.351 --> 00:49:04.318
<v Olivia Clark>Can we take those offline as well since we're running out of time?

407
00:49:04.398 --> 00:49:07.605
<v Olivia Clark>And I don't know that Emily is going to have deep answers to that.

408
00:49:07.686 --> 00:49:11.842
<v Olivia Clark>At this point on engagement, but you raise some really important issues.

409
00:49:12.050 --> 00:49:15.599
<v Olivia Clark>Unless there's a quick response, I, I think it's pretty complicated.

410
00:49:16.673 --> 00:49:18.135
<v Tate White>I can follow up really briefly.

411
00:49:18.536 --> 00:49:18.840
<v Tate White>Thank you.

412
00:49:19.161 --> 00:49:25.775
<v Tate White>Um, I did want to highlight there's a long-range public safety facilities master plan that I think you would all be interested in that I'll share with you.

413
00:49:26.545 --> 00:49:30.574
<v Tate White>And Emily is going to integrate all these wonderful pieces together.

414
00:49:31.039 --> 00:49:38.536
<v Tate White>And I think we do have a citywide engagement officer that will need to be replaced, or that work will go forward.

415
00:49:38.599 --> 00:49:46.876
<v Tate White>And I think That's the kind of direction we're going in, and the strategy talks about the importance of having sort of those citywide standards.

416
00:49:46.940 --> 00:49:52.826
<v Tate White>And we have the opportunity to do engagement more as a— as one city, and I think we could go in that direction.

417
00:49:53.418 --> 00:49:56.177
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah, I'm fine taking this off of today's agenda.

418
00:49:56.483 --> 00:50:03.539
<v Sameer Kanal>I just— my concern is that we're going to end up with a chief engagement officer who tries to do it out of the administration again.

419
00:50:04.164 --> 00:50:09.891
<v Sameer Kanal>And so I'm hoping that as we work through this, that there— when we talk about one city, that was this side of the dais too.

420
00:50:10.583 --> 00:50:25.666
<v Sameer Kanal>And so I think we do need to discuss it because as long as this position is housed under the administrator, which I've, you know, raised issues with, but as long as it's there, we have to make sure we're giving clear guidance on it or we're going to keep replicating decades of bad engagement at the city.

421
00:50:25.762 --> 00:50:29.184
<v Olivia Clark>Well, I hope Emily will put a pin in that and we'll come back to that.

422
00:50:29.793 --> 00:50:31.255
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Koyama Lane.

423
00:50:31.802 --> 00:50:32.893
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you, all of you.

424
00:50:33.166 --> 00:50:36.764
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you for the presentation, but thank you even more for the report.

425
00:50:37.005 --> 00:50:39.458
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I think that's where I found the most helpful information.

426
00:50:40.050 --> 00:50:53.590
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And, um, kind of my colleagues started the conversation around equity, and I want to point us to page 17 of the strategy document, um, which talks about adopting a citywide equity framework.

427
00:50:54.072 --> 00:50:55.385
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I really appreciate that.

428
00:50:55.449 --> 00:50:56.956
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I think that's incredibly important.

429
00:50:57.117 --> 00:51:01.715
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I also appreciate that there was language around targeted universalism.

430
00:51:02.324 --> 00:51:09.244
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Um, And I was just wondering if we— if anyone could speak to where we're at in developing or adopting a framework like this.

431
00:51:11.550 --> 00:51:12.001
<v Tate White>Thank you.

432
00:51:12.373 --> 00:51:15.800
<v Tate White>I'm, I'm glad you're focusing in on that and reviewing the report.

433
00:51:15.847 --> 00:51:31.139
<v Tate White>We had a lot of great equity practitioners take part in this work, and, um, Officer Tillman, our equity officer, has been really involved, and I would have to defer to her probably on how we're approaching that.

434
00:51:31.219 --> 00:51:42.023
<v Tate White>But I really appreciated— not everyone loves asset management, is, is really keen to review our, our work on it, and she really was, and she really dug into it.

435
00:51:42.072 --> 00:51:46.856
<v Tate White>So I think that Officer Trish and Officer Tillman will continue to work together on that.

436
00:51:47.193 --> 00:51:48.141
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>What an amazing answer.

437
00:51:48.221 --> 00:51:54.675
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I love that you're going to be doing that together, and I just can't help but underscore part of that conversation.

438
00:51:54.739 --> 00:52:05.132
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Just want to As we're talking about our assets being accessible, just want to make sure we're making sure we're also focusing on age-friendly and thinking about how we're meeting Portlanders' needs at critical ages and stages.

439
00:52:05.789 --> 00:52:33.201
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And then on page 8 of that report talks about the governance charter, um, which I'm really excited to just— I'm a big fan of cross-bureau coordination and just, I'm wondering if there are any details that can be shared about how that governance charter would be used to help with that coordination across bureaus, like for assets like when we're replacing curb cuts or other projects where different bureaus' service areas are going to be crossing, coordinating?

440
00:52:34.436 --> 00:52:35.206
<v Tate White>Yes, definitely.

441
00:52:35.398 --> 00:52:42.585
<v Tate White>I think we're already seeing this in the Unified Public Works capital program work that they're doing.

442
00:52:42.681 --> 00:52:51.329
<v Tate White>I know Carrie Rubin's with us today, and they're already like— the governance work will really help everyone come together and sort of identify joint projects.

443
00:52:51.922 --> 00:52:58.925
<v Tate White>And opportunities to really combine forces and find efficiencies and savings and partnering together.

444
00:52:59.311 --> 00:53:02.233
<v Tate White>And I think that will spill over to the engagement aspect as well.

445
00:53:02.523 --> 00:53:08.672
<v Tate White>So we're again engaging more as one city and not doing all these projects in separate silos.

446
00:53:08.929 --> 00:53:24.969
<v Tate White>And then as we get down to implementing things like citywide prioritization and thinking about having more of a citywide capital plan, I think that governance will be really important to work through that and make decisions about which projects to prioritize.

447
00:53:25.628 --> 00:53:26.206
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you.

448
00:53:26.302 --> 00:53:27.248
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>So glad you're here.

449
00:53:27.329 --> 00:53:28.501
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Excited to see next steps.

450
00:53:28.757 --> 00:53:29.864
<v Emily Trish>Thank you very much.

451
00:53:30.121 --> 00:53:30.876
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Councilor.

452
00:53:31.260 --> 00:53:32.737
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor, we're really out of time.

453
00:53:32.849 --> 00:53:49.141
<v Olivia Clark>I'm going to forego, uh, asking any questions at this point, but I'm going to encourage Emily to reach out to each member of this committee to schedule some time because we haven't had really adequate time today to but I think if you sit down with each of us, it'll be a much more robust conversation.

454
00:53:49.255 --> 00:53:50.306
<v Olivia Clark>But we appreciate your work.

455
00:53:50.403 --> 00:53:51.230
<v Olivia Clark>We're glad you're here.

456
00:53:51.278 --> 00:53:53.820
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Tate, for everything that you've done up to this point.

457
00:53:54.351 --> 00:53:56.978
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, thank you, DCA, and we will see you again.

458
00:53:57.672 --> 00:53:58.945
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you so much for today.

459
00:54:00.489 --> 00:54:02.476
<v Olivia Clark>In the interest of time, let's move right ahead.

460
00:54:02.541 --> 00:54:04.367
<v Olivia Clark>Diana, can you please call the next item?

461
00:54:05.514 --> 00:54:07.599
<v Unidentified speaker>Item number 2, document number 2026-357.

462
00:54:11.056 --> 00:54:13.927
<v Unidentified speaker>Local regulation of automated vehicles.

463
00:54:15.324 --> 00:54:15.965
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Diana.

464
00:54:16.110 --> 00:54:23.858
<v Olivia Clark>Colleagues, we're returning to our discussion on regulating the commercial operation of for-hire autonomous vehicles on Portland streets.

465
00:54:24.934 --> 00:54:31.494
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, I don't think that as a city we're really ready for these vehicles, um, and I'm afraid they're coming.

466
00:54:32.233 --> 00:54:37.510
<v Olivia Clark>Um, I believe we need to get ahead of this and have a framework ready to regulate this industry.

467
00:54:38.327 --> 00:54:47.449
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, not to mention, it's important that we send a signal to the state legislature that we are invested in ensuring the safe operations of these vehicles in our city.

468
00:54:48.282 --> 00:54:59.936
<v Olivia Clark>Autonomous vehicle companies have thus far managed to avoid any city regulations across the country by working on state-level preemption, and I'm afraid that might happen here.

469
00:55:00.706 --> 00:55:09.889
<v Olivia Clark>It's important that we move quickly on regulation to make it clear that as a city we care about safety, accountability, and our private-for-hire workers.

470
00:55:10.802 --> 00:55:14.168
<v Olivia Clark>I've asked PBOT to bring forward policy concepts.

471
00:55:15.193 --> 00:55:29.039
<v Olivia Clark>I think hopefully they've met with most of you, um, and we will discuss this today and then get our feedback and then bring back a potential ordinance and resolution at our October 27th meeting for, for a hearing.

472
00:55:30.034 --> 00:55:34.706
<v Olivia Clark>PBOT shared draft code language as well as policy concepts for committee members to consider.

473
00:55:35.155 --> 00:55:36.536
<v Olivia Clark>I hope you've had time to review it.

474
00:55:36.938 --> 00:55:41.161
<v Olivia Clark>We have time for questions today after we get a PBOT presentation.

475
00:55:41.273 --> 00:55:43.971
<v Olivia Clark>So I think— welcome, great to see you.

476
00:55:44.179 --> 00:55:45.496
<v Olivia Clark>Shoshana, do you want to kick it off?

477
00:55:46.476 --> 00:55:47.262
<v Shoshana Cohen>Uh, yes, good morning.

478
00:55:47.438 --> 00:55:50.103
<v Shoshana Cohen>Thank you, Council Vice President Clark and members of the committee.

479
00:55:50.666 --> 00:55:52.882
<v Shoshana Cohen>For the record, my name is Shoshana Cohen.

480
00:55:52.978 --> 00:55:55.048
<v Shoshana Cohen>I'm the Chief of Staff at the Portland Bureau of Transportation.

481
00:55:56.668 --> 00:56:01.061
<v Shoshana Cohen>As was just noted, we're here again today to talk about automated vehicles.

482
00:56:01.878 --> 00:56:06.079
<v Shoshana Cohen>And as we've discussed with you all before, this is a quickly evolving new technology.

483
00:56:06.143 --> 00:56:09.766
<v Shoshana Cohen>It's already having a big impact on multiple cities across the country.

484
00:56:10.952 --> 00:56:16.130
<v Shoshana Cohen>You last heard from us specifically in July when we brought some policy concepts to this committee for discussion.

485
00:56:17.108 --> 00:56:24.719
<v Shoshana Cohen>And since then, we've continued to learn about the impacts of AVs from peer cities, And have continued to think about what a regulatory framework could look like here.

486
00:56:26.288 --> 00:56:38.112
<v Shoshana Cohen>We have further refined the policy concepts that we discussed with you then, and as Chair Clark just said, we're beginning to prepare a package of potential code updates that could be implemented along with administrative rule updates.

487
00:56:38.699 --> 00:56:39.280
<v Shoshana Cohen>Next slide, please.

488
00:56:40.960 --> 00:56:42.525
<v Shoshana Cohen>So here's our agenda.

489
00:56:43.318 --> 00:56:49.164
<v Shoshana Cohen>We'll start with a little bit of refresh of some background and updates on policy development, both here and in the state.

490
00:56:49.230 --> 00:56:49.326
<v Shoshana Cohen>Thank you.

491
00:56:49.815 --> 00:56:51.237
<v Shoshana Cohen>And the state of the industry in Oregon.

492
00:56:51.900 --> 00:57:00.675
<v Shoshana Cohen>We'll then discuss the proposed code and administrative rules with a focus on some of the most significant policy areas, and then finally close out with a summary of next steps.

493
00:57:03.199 --> 00:57:10.016
<v Shoshana Cohen>So I'd like to begin again with a quick recap of what's been going on in Portland and Oregon and the work to date.

494
00:57:10.744 --> 00:57:36.219
<v Shoshana Cohen>Back in 2017, a previous Portland City Council passed the Safe Automated Vehicle Initiative, SAVI, which charged PBOT with developing initial AV regulations to ensure based on that directive, PBOT adopted administrative rules the following year that allowed for the testing of AVs with a permit and prohibited commercial deployment.

495
00:57:36.380 --> 00:57:40.190
<v Shoshana Cohen>However, no testing permits under that administrative rule were ever issued.

496
00:57:40.960 --> 00:57:49.380
<v Shoshana Cohen>That same year, the state of Oregon created a task force on automated vehicles, and the city of Portland and many other stakeholders participated in that task force.

497
00:57:49.380 --> 00:57:49.420
<v Shoshana Cohen>Thank you.

498
00:57:49.420 --> 00:57:56.092
<v Shoshana Cohen>The task force which issued 2 reports, one in 2018 and one in 2019, before being disbanded, dissolved.

499
00:57:57.396 --> 00:58:08.228
<v Shoshana Cohen>It then became clear that automated vehicles were actually some years away from commercial operations, and while staff continued to track the topic, we paused significant staff work on the topic.

500
00:58:09.929 --> 00:58:21.139
<v Shoshana Cohen>Last fall then, we became aware of a bill in the state legislature that would have enabled the commercial operations of AV statewide and preempted Portland as well as other local jurisdictions' regulatory authority around AVs.

501
00:58:21.221 --> 00:58:22.713
<v Shoshana Cohen>Next slide, please.

502
00:58:25.949 --> 00:58:26.353
<v Shoshana Cohen>At—.

503
00:58:26.755 --> 00:58:28.945
<v Shoshana Cohen>Oh, sorry, I think I did next slide too quickly.

504
00:58:29.025 --> 00:58:35.153
<v Shoshana Cohen>But at that same time, we became aware that Waymo was interested in commercial operations in Portland.

505
00:58:35.764 --> 00:58:41.242
<v Shoshana Cohen>And we also saw AV operators preparing to launch operations in greater number of cities around the US.

506
00:58:41.755 --> 00:58:45.722
<v Shoshana Cohen>And this caused us to realize that it really was necessary to sort of dive back into this work.

507
00:58:46.429 --> 00:58:52.708
<v Shoshana Cohen>That's when we began processing the process of updating our administrative rules and to think about code updates.

508
00:58:53.318 --> 00:59:02.085
<v Shoshana Cohen>And at that time, importantly, we also made it clear, even though we had the existing AV testing rules, we wouldn't offer any testing permits until rules had been updated.

509
00:59:02.969 --> 00:59:03.498
<v Shoshana Cohen>Now, next slide.

510
00:59:04.831 --> 00:59:11.416
<v Shoshana Cohen>So in early 2026, the city and others submitted testimony against that state AV bill, and it didn't move forward.

511
00:59:12.202 --> 00:59:21.047
<v Shoshana Cohen>We also— that's when we began presenting at what was then the City Council's Transportation Infrastructure Committee about the first draft of the administrative rules in February.

512
00:59:21.978 --> 00:59:25.333
<v Shoshana Cohen>And then we held an extended public comment period for the draft rules.

513
00:59:25.766 --> 00:59:33.358
<v Shoshana Cohen>We engaged a variety of stakeholders, private-for-hire drivers, all of our modal committees, Oregon Disabilities Commission, as well as others.

514
00:59:33.936 --> 00:59:39.795
<v Shoshana Cohen>And we published a summary of the over 200 comments we received during that feedback period on our website.

515
00:59:40.135 --> 00:59:41.956
<v Shoshana Cohen>And spoke to you one of the times we were here.

516
00:59:43.159 --> 00:59:50.530
<v Shoshana Cohen>And during this time, we've also been connecting with colleagues around the country who have been experiencing AVs firsthand to learn about the impacts they're seeing.

517
00:59:52.219 --> 00:59:56.759
<v Shoshana Cohen>The next milestone was that in April, Waymo began mapping in Portland.

518
00:59:57.467 --> 01:00:03.286
<v Shoshana Cohen>And while they are mapping, they have a licensed human driver operating, so they don't need a permit from us at this stage.

519
01:00:03.693 --> 01:00:06.657
<v Shoshana Cohen>We also know they're mapping in some of the other cities around the region.

520
01:00:07.753 --> 01:00:14.293
<v Shoshana Cohen>And then as we already said, we brought 7 key policy concepts to this committee in July for discussion and we've continued to refine since then.

521
01:00:15.592 --> 01:00:23.670
<v Shoshana Cohen>The last note is that we're also now getting ready again for the 2027 state legislative session where we do expect at this point to see more AV legislation.

522
01:00:24.809 --> 01:00:31.268
<v Shoshana Cohen>Already during the recent September legislative days in Salem, Waymo presented at the House Committee on Transportation.

523
01:00:31.943 --> 01:00:38.900
<v Shoshana Cohen>The presentation was focused on safety and the Waymo public policy manager said that he looked forward to building on the legislation yes.

524
01:00:39.108 --> 01:00:40.134
<v Shoshana Cohen>—Presented in the past.

525
01:00:40.838 --> 01:00:48.757
<v Shoshana Cohen>And Representative McClain, the chair of the committee, stated that she wanted to avoid the piecemeal regulation scenario that happened with transportation network companies.

526
01:00:49.896 --> 01:00:56.340
<v Shoshana Cohen>At the same time, our neighbors to the north in Washington State are also facing pressure to enable automated vehicles statewide.

527
01:00:56.789 --> 01:01:04.692
<v Shoshana Cohen>We've just recently been given a copy of draft legislation that we've heard is a collaboration between 2 robotaxi companies, Zoox and Waymo.

528
01:01:05.300 --> 01:01:28.717
<v Shoshana Cohen>And we haven't had a chance yet to sort of dig in closely enough, but we will, and we expect it may all of this has been happening here and in Oregon, um, and at the same time is happening within the context of a national conversation about the potential challenges, uh, that robotaxi operations may introduce to our cities, as well as the potential benefits.

529
01:01:29.121 --> 01:01:34.269
<v Shoshana Cohen>I want to pause and acknowledge sometimes we're saying robotaxi companies and sometimes we're saying automated vehicles.

530
01:01:34.724 --> 01:01:40.833
<v Shoshana Cohen>It's, I think, um, Jargon of the industry that has made its way into our talking points, but it's the same thing.

531
01:01:43.295 --> 01:02:04.217
<v Shoshana Cohen>And like our discussions here, many others are grappling with concerns such as negative impacts to traffic safety and other right-of-way users, the loss of jobs, privacy concerns, potential to grow vehicle miles traveled, add congestion, and impact land use, as well as other things.

532
01:02:04.998 --> 01:02:12.724
<v Shoshana Cohen>And, and these potential challenges have been driving the regulatory policy proposals that we're bringing to you today for consideration.

533
01:02:13.528 --> 01:02:17.400
<v Shoshana Cohen>At the same time, not all the national discourse has been negative.

534
01:02:17.849 --> 01:02:27.072
<v Shoshana Cohen>We all know our transportation system around the country has real traffic safety problems, so the potential for AVs to bring safety benefits is part of the national conversation.

535
01:02:27.987 --> 01:02:35.161
<v Shoshana Cohen>The first major third-party study looking at Waymo safety data was recently conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

536
01:02:35.773 --> 01:02:46.577
<v Shoshana Cohen>And while we definitely want to still dig in and better understand this study, so far we've heard that it found that per mile, Waymo vehicles were involved in 68% fewer crashes than human drivers.

537
01:02:47.443 --> 01:02:53.815
<v Shoshana Cohen>And then there's also the potential for AVs to provide personal safety benefits and to feel safer and more comfortable for some users.

538
01:02:55.346 --> 01:03:01.195
<v Shoshana Cohen>While some of us are just considering potential challenges or benefits, other cities, on the other hand, are already experiencing them.

539
01:03:01.242 --> 01:03:05.847
<v Shoshana Cohen>There are at least 15 other cities where AVs are already operating.

540
01:03:06.699 --> 01:03:07.101
<v Shoshana Cohen>Next slide.

541
01:03:08.224 --> 01:03:17.523
<v Shoshana Cohen>And in these 15 cities, they're all operating where they have been preempted by state legislation, and without— and so they don't have the local regulatory oversight.

542
01:03:17.972 --> 01:03:21.780
<v Shoshana Cohen>So without this regulatory oversight, these cities are experiencing challenges.

543
01:03:22.454 --> 01:03:25.472
<v Shoshana Cohen>They don't know how many for-hire AVs are operating in their cities.

544
01:03:25.987 --> 01:03:32.860
<v Shoshana Cohen>They don't receive data on where pickups and drop-offs are happening, so they can't work to manage curb space or thoughtfully prioritize different users.

545
01:03:33.759 --> 01:03:39.940
<v Shoshana Cohen>We're seeing cities struggle with managing how robotaxis interact with large events or even regular events like farmers markets.

546
01:03:40.664 --> 01:03:45.802
<v Shoshana Cohen>And perhaps most importantly, these cities have no way to suspend or revoke AV company permits.

547
01:03:46.443 --> 01:03:55.099
<v Shoshana Cohen>If these cities have issues or complaints, they have to raise them to state regulators who may not understand the local context or take any action.

548
01:03:56.878 --> 01:04:07.340
<v Shoshana Cohen>On the other hand, the AV companies want to see regulation at the state level rather than the city level, and they— and we've heard them say that without statewide consistency, there'll be a patchwork of regulations they can't operate in.

549
01:04:08.108 --> 01:04:12.163
<v Shoshana Cohen>This is the same argument that we heard for many years from transportation network companies.

550
01:04:13.235 --> 01:04:23.778
<v Shoshana Cohen>However, the City of Portland has worked very hard over the years to maintain our local authority to regulate transportation network companies, and we're one of the few cities across the country that has maintained this authority.

551
01:04:24.436 --> 01:04:36.438
<v Shoshana Cohen>And it's allowed us to do all sorts of things, to collect trip-level data, to understand the impacts of TNCs on our system, to set our own trip fees, and to do things like create the recently passed Drivers Resource Center.

552
01:04:37.449 --> 01:04:41.114
<v Shoshana Cohen>And we have not seen a patchwork of regulations develop.

553
01:04:41.643 --> 01:05:01.659
<v Shoshana Cohen>Portland's regulations serve as the region's regulations, so drivers can go seamlessly between Portland, Beaverton, Gresham, wherever else they need to drive So we're here today again to share, just to share some options for what regulations could potentially look like here.

554
01:05:02.126 --> 01:05:03.733
<v Shoshana Cohen>This is a complex area.

555
01:05:03.894 --> 01:05:10.568
<v Shoshana Cohen>No other city in the country, as Chair Clark said, has passed regulations for commercial robotaxi service yet.

556
01:05:11.114 --> 01:05:17.253
<v Shoshana Cohen>Minneapolis and Washington, D.C. are sort of like us and close in thinking about it, developing a regulatory framework.

557
01:05:17.719 --> 01:05:20.217
<v Shoshana Cohen>And the Minneapolis City Council recently passed a proposal, but it was later vetoed by the mayor.

558
01:05:20.268 --> 01:05:36.240
<v Shoshana Cohen>So we're here today to talk about So while there's no complete city model we can look to, the ideas we've shared with you today have very much been informed by the experiences of other cities, both those who have them and who are considering what might happen.

559
01:05:37.139 --> 01:05:42.905
<v Shoshana Cohen>And the options we're presenting are also designed to be aligned with Portland safety, climate, equity, and mobility goals.

560
01:05:43.483 --> 01:05:48.784
<v Shoshana Cohen>And in addition to looking and talking to peer cities, we've spoken with subject matter expert staff from across city bureaus.

561
01:05:48.831 --> 01:05:49.025
<v Shoshana Cohen>Thank you.

562
01:05:50.710 --> 01:06:03.050
<v Shoshana Cohen>And the final thing before I hand it over is that the current proposals are intended to go slow with the rollout to verify that companies are meeting our standards and to ensure that we can continue to evaluate the program and update our regulations as needed.

563
01:06:03.306 --> 01:06:06.773
<v Shoshana Cohen>And with that, I'll hand it over to Jacob Sherman to dive in more.

564
01:06:06.918 --> 01:06:08.088
<v Jacob Sherman>Great, thanks so much, Shoshana.

565
01:06:08.137 --> 01:06:11.282
<v Jacob Sherman>Good morning, Council Vice President Clark, members of the committee.

566
01:06:11.347 --> 01:06:12.887
<v Jacob Sherman>For the record, my name is Jacob Sherman.

567
01:06:13.353 --> 01:06:16.208
<v Jacob Sherman>I lead the city's work on emerging technology at the Bureau of Transportation.

568
01:06:16.289 --> 01:06:16.929
<v Jacob Sherman>Transportation.

569
01:06:17.762 --> 01:06:28.706
<v Jacob Sherman>My team and I work on policy and projects including electric vehicle car charging, goods movement, zero-emission freight, the private-for-hire industry, shared micromobility, and automated vehicles.

570
01:06:29.474 --> 01:06:30.179
<v Jacob Sherman>Next slide.

571
01:06:30.740 --> 01:06:37.757
<v Jacob Sherman>I'd like to give a quick overview of the code package and administrative rules that kind of shape up our regulatory approach.

572
01:06:37.967 --> 01:06:59.967
<v Jacob Sherman>I'm going to go through this at a really high level to help you get kind of the complete picture, and then I'm going to hand it over to my colleague Hannah, who's going to dive in on some of I think in many ways, kind of presenting this complete picture as a puzzle and not focusing so much on the individual pieces, but the big picture, so you can understand that again before diving in.

573
01:07:00.963 --> 01:07:10.213
<v Jacob Sherman>First, want to note that the draft administrative rules that we're proposing will not go into effect until at least July 1st, 2027 at the earliest.

574
01:07:10.615 --> 01:07:11.804
<v Jacob Sherman>Anything that you pass will take time to implement.

575
01:07:11.853 --> 01:07:11.949
<v Jacob Sherman>Thank you.

576
01:07:12.126 --> 01:07:16.369
<v Jacob Sherman>Time for us to build the systems and processes to actually implement.

577
01:07:16.786 --> 01:07:21.463
<v Jacob Sherman>And so we'll need— we would need any time and would not be issuing any permits in the meantime.

578
01:07:21.655 --> 01:07:22.362
<v Jacob Sherman>Next slide.

579
01:07:24.050 --> 01:07:29.626
<v Jacob Sherman>So this is the set of regulations that together we think will manage the operation of for-hire vehicles.

580
01:07:29.835 --> 01:07:31.797
<v Jacob Sherman>I'd like to highlight a few things.

581
01:07:32.215 --> 01:07:47.440
<v Jacob Sherman>First, all AV companies would be required to submit a map of the area of the city that they intend to operate, as well as a description of what time, what roads, what speed limits, what weather, And what other kind of conditions they would be operating in.

582
01:07:48.050 --> 01:07:56.835
<v Jacob Sherman>Before they could begin those operations, city staff and the city administrator would have to review and approve these materials known as an operational design domain.

583
01:07:57.331 --> 01:08:05.378
<v Jacob Sherman>If the companies wanted to change those at any aspect in the future, then they would have to resubmit and get reapproved operational design domains.

584
01:08:05.588 --> 01:08:08.184
<v Jacob Sherman>This is something that happens in the state of California currently.

585
01:08:08.969 --> 01:08:14.644
<v Jacob Sherman>Second, our proposal requires that for-hire AVs be fully battery electric and registered in Oregon.

586
01:08:15.288 --> 01:08:31.380
<v Jacob Sherman>This would automatically require them to be enrolled in the ORIGO program, which is Oregon's road usage charge program that results in a per-mile vehicle mile traveled fee to help offset the state's lack of gas tax that comes from AVs or from EVs.

587
01:08:32.006 --> 01:08:37.096
<v Jacob Sherman>We think this is a really kind of important approach and wanted to highlight that for you all.

588
01:08:37.466 --> 01:08:37.979
<v Jacob Sherman>Next slide.

589
01:08:38.992 --> 01:08:44.146
<v Jacob Sherman>We also have a set of different regulations that together focus on safety and reporting in Vision Zero.

590
01:08:44.612 --> 01:08:56.987
<v Jacob Sherman>To better understand any company's safety record, all companies would be required to provide a description of their experience, including all reported crashes, injuries, and incidents that negatively impacted the traffic system.

591
01:08:57.581 --> 01:09:07.582
<v Jacob Sherman>Companies would also be required to share any crash records that they must file with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration with PBOT, as well as with the State of Oregon.

592
01:09:08.721 --> 01:09:24.581
<v Jacob Sherman>All companies would be required to submit and review and receive approval for that operations plan detailing how they'll handle Portland-specific elements of the transportation system, such as some of our bike buses or our unique bicycle infrastructure that we have.

593
01:09:26.203 --> 01:09:36.996
<v Jacob Sherman>We're also working with the city's attorney's office on a set of insurance and liability levels to protect all Portlanders, both passengers inside the AVs as well as everyone else in the public right-of-way.

594
01:09:37.045 --> 01:09:37.936
<v Jacob Sherman>Next slide.

595
01:09:39.104 --> 01:09:46.984
<v Jacob Sherman>While there's many promises to some of this new technology, They're going to have to be— require coordination with the city to really be realized.

596
01:09:47.386 --> 01:10:02.921
<v Jacob Sherman>So for example, we think AV companies must comply with city-issued geofences to ensure that their vehicles are not disrupting events in the street, such as a Sunday Parkways event, a crash that could occur, the Portland Marathon, or other kinds of first responder events.

597
01:10:03.497 --> 01:10:14.400
<v Jacob Sherman>Additionally, we'd like AV companies to share trip data with the city so we can fully understand the impact of this new technology and use that data to help inform policy and, and changes in the future.

598
01:10:14.947 --> 01:10:20.240
<v Jacob Sherman>By sharing where pickup and drop-offs occur, we can add pickup and drop-off spaces to the curb.

599
01:10:20.947 --> 01:10:31.006
<v Jacob Sherman>We currently have some of these known as fast stops to help ensure that we're doing safe pickup and drop-off and not doing pickup and drop-off in things like the bicycle lane.

600
01:10:32.257 --> 01:10:38.595
<v Jacob Sherman>We have a set of data privacy requirements that Hannah will dive— Hannah will dive deeper into in a moment.

601
01:10:39.077 --> 01:10:39.688
<v Jacob Sherman>Next slide.

602
01:10:41.198 --> 01:10:49.029
<v Jacob Sherman>The final kind of big picture overview set of regulations is to use our local authority to actively manage the pace of change.

603
01:10:49.712 --> 01:10:59.240
<v Jacob Sherman>As Shoshana said earlier, our proposed strategy is to go slow and verify compliance and safe operations of AVs and to evaluate change as needed.

604
01:10:59.756 --> 01:11:13.820
<v Jacob Sherman>To this end, PBOT is proposing we'd conduct an annual review of operations and We develop a report that would help inform changes to fleet caps, which Hannah will talk about next, as well as any other changes that may be needed.

605
01:11:14.399 --> 01:11:26.904
<v Jacob Sherman>We'll also require companies to conduct training and demonstration events with first responders to help ensure that police, fire, and other first responders know how to manage AVs in an emergency situation.

606
01:11:27.289 --> 01:11:27.963
<v Jacob Sherman>Next slide.

607
01:11:28.478 --> 01:11:31.528
<v Jacob Sherman>So together, kind of big picture, we think this package of thank you.

608
01:11:31.591 --> 01:11:36.055
<v Jacob Sherman>This package of policy proposals is designed to set a high bar for AV operations.

609
01:11:36.554 --> 01:11:43.363
<v Jacob Sherman>Some of the policies we're discussing will be advanced through city code, while other would be advanced through administrative rules.

610
01:11:44.278 --> 01:11:51.936
<v Jacob Sherman>And this is because there's a few different factors that we think about when determining whether we recommend something be in city code or admin rule.

611
01:11:52.451 --> 01:12:15.389
<v Jacob Sherman>City code, as you might know, is generally reserved for policies that are bigger picture and more foundational and durable rather than kind fine-grained, um, uh, fine-grained implementation things that might need to change in the future, such as administrative rules, which is the place where we really define how policies are implemented and can be dynamic and updated more regularly.

612
01:12:15.886 --> 01:12:19.706
<v Jacob Sherman>Administrative rules, though, it's important to note, have a public process.

613
01:12:20.074 --> 01:12:27.503
<v Jacob Sherman>They're shared with City Council before any review, uh, or before any approval happens, and they're also subject to public scrutiny.

614
01:12:28.176 --> 01:12:41.582
<v Jacob Sherman>So given the nature of trying to regulate a brand new technology that's rapidly evolving, we're proposing putting some policy in code and other policy in administrative rules so that we can manage change as we go forward.

615
01:12:41.712 --> 01:12:47.307
<v Jacob Sherman>I'm going to hand it over to Hannah now, who's going to dig in on some of those specific policy proposals.

616
01:12:48.141 --> 01:12:48.863
<v Hannah Morrison>Thanks, Jacob.

617
01:12:49.505 --> 01:12:52.198
<v Hannah Morrison>Good morning, Vice President Clark and councilors.

618
01:12:52.789 --> 01:12:56.943
<v Hannah Morrison>For the record, my name is Hannah Morrison, and I'm a planner on the Mobility Innovation Section at PBOT.

619
01:12:57.880 --> 01:13:07.628
<v Hannah Morrison>As you may remember, we brought a set of policy concepts to you all this summer to get feedback and direction, and based on those conversations we've had with you all, we've refined those policies, and I'm going to dig in a little deeper.

620
01:13:10.015 --> 01:13:13.551
<v Hannah Morrison>The first policy proposal is the one that sets the stage really for everything else.

621
01:13:13.792 --> 01:13:27.637
<v Hannah Morrison>The city has regulated private-for-hire transportation for over 100 years, and we need to add definitions of automated vehicles into our private-for-hire code to make it clear that the companies using AVs to offer a private-for-hire service are regulated like others in the industry.

622
01:13:28.344 --> 01:13:31.652
<v Hannah Morrison>This proposal has not changed substantially since July.

623
01:13:31.779 --> 01:13:41.479
<v Hannah Morrison>In addition to adding a definition for automated vehicles, we have added a few other AV-specific definitions, as you see on the slide, and added some AV-specific language to a few other definitions.

624
01:13:42.153 --> 01:13:47.259
<v Hannah Morrison>And all of these are based on language from the Society of Automobile Engineers, which really sets the national standard.

625
01:13:50.182 --> 01:13:55.341
<v Hannah Morrison>The second policy concept is to establish the authority to set fleet caps for AVs in city code.

626
01:13:55.952 --> 01:14:00.225
<v Hannah Morrison>These fleet caps would apply to both AVs with testing permits and for-hire permits.

627
01:14:01.029 --> 01:14:05.979
<v Hannah Morrison>And setting these caps on AVs will help us safely manage this change to our streets and the for-hire industry.

628
01:14:06.734 --> 01:14:19.777
<v Hannah Morrison>This proposal sets the expectation that based on the annual evaluation of operational impacts of AVs that Jacob just talked about, The city administrator would propose updates to both the per-company fleet cap and the citywide for-hire AV fleet cap.

629
01:14:20.771 --> 01:14:33.038
<v Hannah Morrison>Since we are proposing the actual fleet cap numbers to be set in administrative rule, any update to the fleet cap numbers would then go through the administrative rule public process with a 30-day public comment period and option for a public hearing.

630
01:14:33.778 --> 01:14:41.436
<v Hannah Morrison>This public engagement process would help ensure that any changes to AV fleet caps occur through transparent conversation with the public and with City Council.

631
01:14:42.180 --> 01:14:53.670
<v Hannah Morrison>With that in mind, I do want to share an initial proposal of per-company and citywide AV fleet caps for the first year.

632
01:14:54.569 --> 01:14:57.250
<v Hannah Morrison>We considered a few things while developing this proposal.

633
01:14:57.689 --> 01:15:01.810
<v Hannah Morrison>First, there are currently over 15,000 permitted Uber and Lyft drivers in the city.

634
01:15:02.170 --> 01:15:07.430
<v Hannah Morrison>While they're not all driving full-time, so it's not a one-to-one comparison, we tried to keep the number of AVs in the city small in line with the number of drivers.

635
01:15:07.764 --> 01:15:09.819
<v Hannah Morrison>Compared to the number of human-for-hire drivers.

636
01:15:10.559 --> 01:15:20.823
<v Hannah Morrison>We also looked at fleet caps or fleet sizes in other cities, which is admittedly challenging since no other cities have regulations that require companies to tell them just how many AVs are operating in their city.

637
01:15:21.497 --> 01:15:27.072
<v Hannah Morrison>But third parties have estimated over 1,000 AVs in San Francisco, which is likely the largest for-hire market.

638
01:15:28.083 --> 01:15:43.386
<v Hannah Morrison>So these proposed year 1 fleet caps would limit the AV fleet to roughly 1.5% of Portland's total private for-hire fleet, Allowing for a small rollout of this new technology while the rest of our regulations that Jacob shared work in concert with each other to manage daily operations.

639
01:15:46.500 --> 01:15:49.984
<v Hannah Morrison>The next policy proposal is to clearly define testing permit metrics.

640
01:15:50.564 --> 01:16:00.426
<v Hannah Morrison>So under this proposal, every AV company would be required to begin local operations with a testing permit to ensure that they prove their technology can navigate the unique aspects of Portland streets.

641
01:16:00.994 --> 01:16:04.694
<v Hannah Morrison>This testing permit is a required first step before AV companies could offer any paid rides.

642
01:16:04.806 --> 01:16:04.970
<v Hannah Morrison>Thank you.

643
01:16:05.416 --> 01:16:06.813
<v Hannah Morrison>Before with a for-hire permit.

644
01:16:07.744 --> 01:16:19.997
<v Hannah Morrison>All companies' AV driver, or that software system that is their AV driver, would be required to log 50,000 miles cumulatively across their fleet with a testing permit before becoming eligible to apply for that for-hire AV permit.

645
01:16:21.009 --> 01:16:38.404
<v Hannah Morrison>This 50,000-mile requirement is based off of best practices from California state-level regulations, but we also believe it's the right balance, or could be the right balance, between proving that the AV driver can safely navigate our city while not being too many miles that we're encouraging, uh, empty vehicle miles traveled on our streets.

646
01:16:39.284 --> 01:16:46.399
<v Hannah Morrison>And while the same AV driver would be completing the entire 50,000-mile requirement, this proposal does split testing into 2 phases.

647
01:16:46.577 --> 01:16:49.396
<v Hannah Morrison>Again, this is something based off of best practices in California.

648
01:16:49.862 --> 01:17:02.873
<v Hannah Morrison>The first 25,000 miles of a testing permit must be completed with a licensed human driver in the vehicle, while the second 25,000 miles could be completed with no human driver in the vehicle.

649
01:17:02.921 --> 01:17:06.797
<v Hannah Morrison>Uh, next is the proposal around metrics for permit suspension for that AV driver.

650
01:17:07.412 --> 01:17:13.774
<v Hannah Morrison>And these metrics were really informed by the many claims from AV companies that their AV drivers are much safer than human drivers.

651
01:17:14.532 --> 01:17:20.631
<v Hannah Morrison>These metrics were informed— um, we have a standard for human private-for-hire drivers, uh, to ensure that we're permitting safe drivers.

652
01:17:21.293 --> 01:17:29.636
<v Hannah Morrison>And in Portland, we suspend a human taxi, Uber, or Lyft driver if they get 2 traffic violations in a single year or a total of 3 violations in 5 years.

653
01:17:29.814 --> 01:17:33.395
<v Hannah Morrison>And here we're really proposing holding the robotaxis to a similar standard.

654
01:17:34.887 --> 01:17:46.226
<v Hannah Morrison>One key difference is that since AV drivers— AV companies treat their software as a singular driver, we would be considering violations by any car within a company's fleet as accumulating to that same AV driver.

655
01:17:46.676 --> 01:17:59.252
<v Hannah Morrison>So if 2 separate vehicles within one company's fleet each get a traffic violation or are otherwise found to be operating in an unsafe manner, that would count as 2 violations for that company's AV driver and would be grounds for suspending the company's permit.

656
01:18:00.006 --> 01:18:08.037
<v Hannah Morrison>This permit would be suspended until the company can certify to the city that the issue or issues for which their AV driver received the violations are resolved.

657
01:18:08.646 --> 01:18:11.355
<v Hannah Morrison>And this process would repeat for subsequent violations.

658
01:18:11.868 --> 01:18:22.997
<v Hannah Morrison>So additionally, if the AV driver continues to repeat that same unsafe behavior that the company has already certified that they've resolved, This could become grounds for additional action like fines or permit revocation.

659
01:18:23.935 --> 01:18:33.216
<v Hannah Morrison>We believe this is a much higher standard for any potential permit suspension than anything else we've seen proposed in the states, and then it could help address some of the challenges we've seen in other cities.

660
01:18:36.202 --> 01:18:38.792
<v Hannah Morrison>This next policy concept is also safety-focused.

661
01:18:39.421 --> 01:18:47.935
<v Hannah Morrison>We have had many conversations about the safety hazard of AVs and vehicles in general stopping in bicycle lanes to wait to pick yes.

662
01:18:49.027 --> 01:18:58.774
<v Hannah Morrison>So there is existing city code that currently states that all drivers are limited to stopping in any street, bicycle lane, or transit lane for no more than 30 seconds to load or unload passengers.

663
01:18:59.592 --> 01:19:06.802
<v Hannah Morrison>So our suggestion here is that we would reaffirm the maximum stop time of 30 seconds for all private-for-hire drivers in city code.

664
01:19:07.862 --> 01:19:17.396
<v Hannah Morrison>Given that AVs sometimes wait for 2 minutes, if not more, for passengers to enter the AV and start their ride, this this should prohibit them from waiting in bicycle lanes to pick up passengers.

665
01:19:18.310 --> 01:19:25.817
<v Hannah Morrison>I do want to note that there is another option for this policy concept, and that would be to fully ban pickup and drop-offs in bicycle lanes or transit lanes.

666
01:19:26.570 --> 01:19:32.007
<v Hannah Morrison>This policy move would probably make more sense to implement across the entire private-for-hire industry, not just AVs.

667
01:19:32.970 --> 01:19:43.106
<v Hannah Morrison>This could lead to more stopping in travel lanes and potentially have unintended safety or mobility consequences, but we just wanted to acknowledge that this is another policy option to consider should you all want to go further.

668
01:19:43.154 --> 01:19:43.283
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

669
01:19:46.457 --> 01:20:00.612
<v Hannah Morrison>This next policy proposal focuses on limitations on the sale, sharing, or transferring of data collected by AVs, and we've proposed adding this to the administrative rules so that we can dynamically respond to any changes in data collected or new privacy best practices that may emerge.

670
01:20:01.782 --> 01:20:05.260
<v Hannah Morrison>We know that AVs collect data both inside and outside of their vehicles.

671
01:20:05.453 --> 01:20:12.248
<v Hannah Morrison>Most AVs use a combination of LiDAR, radar, 360-degree video and audio data collected from their vehicles.

672
01:20:12.524 --> 01:20:19.596
<v Hannah Morrison>And while some of this data is used for safe operations of AVs, we do know it will be critical to put strong safeguards around the use of this data.

673
01:20:20.274 --> 01:20:29.622
<v Hannah Morrison>So we have consulted with the City Data and Privacy Office to ensure that these regulations would be consistent with related city policy on surveillance and privacy and are considered best practices.

674
01:20:31.206 --> 01:20:37.360
<v Hannah Morrison>The first proposal is to prohibit AV companies from selling any data collected by their AVs on City of Portland streets.

675
01:20:38.097 --> 01:20:41.175
<v Hannah Morrison>Companies should not get to profit off of the data that they collect in our city.

676
01:20:42.184 --> 01:20:47.087
<v Hannah Morrison>The second proposal is to require city administrator approval before sharing or transferring any data.

677
01:20:47.712 --> 01:20:56.188
<v Hannah Morrison>We don't anticipate many use cases for this, but we could potentially be interested in sharing data with a third party to help us analyze trip location data and operations.

678
01:20:57.086 --> 01:21:13.975
<v Hannah Morrison>Finally, we would require a warrant signed by a judge before any data collected on our streets is shared with or transferred to another governmental together, we think that these policies will allow companies to operate while also enacting strong, strong regulations that protect Portlanders from unnecessary surveillance.

679
01:21:17.787 --> 01:21:22.425
<v Hannah Morrison>Next, I'd like to introduce a new policy proposal, which is to define remote operators in city code.

680
01:21:23.260 --> 01:21:30.264
<v Hannah Morrison>Remote operators refer to humans who intervene in AV operations if the AV encounters an unknown situation or is uncertain on how to proceed.

681
01:21:30.328 --> 01:21:30.538
<v Hannah Morrison>Thank you.

682
01:21:31.804 --> 01:21:45.162
<v Hannah Morrison>It has been really difficult to get a complete picture of how often remote operators intervene in AV operations, but a Senate investigation earlier this year found that remote operators could be located overseas and that many do not hold U.S. driver's licenses.

683
01:21:46.301 --> 01:21:56.900
<v Hannah Morrison>With the current lack of federal guidance on remote operations, we feel it's really important here to set minimum requirements that all remote operators must hold a U.S.-based driver's license and be based in the United States.

684
01:21:56.948 --> 01:21:57.045
<v Hannah Morrison>Thank you.

685
01:21:58.184 --> 01:22:18.581
<v Hannah Morrison>California has also recently taken steps to define remote operators, and new regulations from the California DMV, which will become active in July 2028, state the same requirements we have proposed here, that all remote operators for fleets active in California have a U.S.-based driver's license and be based in the U.S. and then this is the final policy proposal.

686
01:22:19.930 --> 01:22:31.713
<v Hannah Morrison>First, AVs would be subject to the same fees as TNCs, including all permit and per-trip In addition is the establishment of a per-trip driver support fee to support workers due to this unprecedented change.

687
01:22:32.708 --> 01:22:37.814
<v Hannah Morrison>A driver support fee could provide funds for things like job training, job placement, or other support.

688
01:22:38.328 --> 01:22:44.717
<v Hannah Morrison>We know council just passed the Driver Resource Center ordinance, and there may be a way to connect these workforce transition activities to that new center.

689
01:22:45.632 --> 01:22:50.690
<v Hannah Morrison>The driver support fee would be included in the fee schedule, which is the same as the TNC per-trip fee and permit fees.

690
01:22:50.738 --> 01:22:50.835
<v Hannah Morrison>Thank you.

691
01:22:51.636 --> 01:22:59.701
<v Hannah Morrison>The fee schedule is updated on an annual basis each fiscal year and has City Council oversight, and we propose to follow that existing annual process here with this new fee.

692
01:23:01.110 --> 01:23:09.063
<v Hannah Morrison>And finally, we do want to acknowledge that there may be a need for other impact fees due to the continued growth and impacts of the entire private-for-hire industry on our streets.

693
01:23:09.832 --> 01:23:16.484
<v Hannah Morrison>However, we do think that any additional impact fees should be considered after we've had a chance to evaluate the actual impact of AVs on our streets.

694
01:23:17.143 --> 01:23:22.323
<v Hannah Morrison>And that these impact fees should be considered for the private hire— private-for-hire industry as a whole, not just for AVs.

695
01:23:23.476 --> 01:23:25.979
<v Hannah Morrison>Thank you, and I'd now like to hand it back to Shoshana for next steps.

696
01:23:27.470 --> 01:23:28.930
<v Shoshana Cohen>Uh, thank you, Hannah.

697
01:23:29.010 --> 01:23:29.859
<v Shoshana Cohen>I think next slide.

698
01:23:30.533 --> 01:23:45.671
<v Shoshana Cohen>So just briefly to recap again, uh, we know there's additional proposals that could be considered, but the entire package of proposed code and administrative rules that we've just heard is designed to protect the public interest and allow the city to actively manage this change.

699
01:23:46.408 --> 01:23:57.555
<v Shoshana Cohen>We've also integrated evaluation and review to our proposed regulations, acknowledging that policies may need to change as this quickly evolving industry changes and we see more about the impacts on our streets.

700
01:23:58.277 --> 01:24:03.552
<v Shoshana Cohen>And then finally, of course, none of us can know what will happen in the 2020 state legislative session around this topic.

701
01:24:03.873 --> 01:24:09.502
<v Shoshana Cohen>We have some hope that a local regulatory package may help to reduce pressure to move forward with state Preemptory.

702
01:24:10.128 --> 01:24:10.994
<v Shoshana Cohen>Preemptory.

703
01:24:11.122 --> 01:24:11.926
<v Shoshana Cohen>I don't know how to say that word.

704
01:24:12.054 --> 01:24:12.695
<v Shoshana Cohen>Legislation.

705
01:24:14.060 --> 01:24:25.868
<v Shoshana Cohen>And then before we dive into discussion, just briefly, as was already said, the current plan is that we would return to this committee in 2 weeks with an ordinance with specific code.

706
01:24:26.493 --> 01:24:32.654
<v Shoshana Cohen>And the ordinance could actually also offer sort of direction on the administrative rules.

707
01:24:33.554 --> 01:24:43.889
<v Shoshana Cohen>And then, and I believe Derek Bradley's in the room, we're continuing to coordinate really really closely with the Office of Government Relations and other partners around the state as we get ready for the state session.

708
01:24:44.403 --> 01:24:47.420
<v Shoshana Cohen>And that's all we have today, and welcome questions.

709
01:24:47.596 --> 01:24:50.438
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you so much, Shoshana, Hannah, and Jacob.

710
01:24:50.502 --> 01:24:52.042
<v Olivia Clark>That was an excellent overview.

711
01:24:52.814 --> 01:24:58.430
<v Olivia Clark>I'm very impressed by the research that you've done across the country, all the work that you put into this.

712
01:24:58.528 --> 01:25:07.564
<v Olivia Clark>I know that we've been pushing you pretty hard to get this done because I was really hoping that we could do this before the end of the year, or at least before the state legislature meets.

713
01:25:08.092 --> 01:25:10.659
<v Olivia Clark>So I appreciate all the work that you've put into this.

714
01:25:10.739 --> 01:25:12.649
<v Olivia Clark>It's, it's really, um, terrific.

715
01:25:13.146 --> 01:25:29.462
<v Olivia Clark>So, um, I know we have about half an hour for discussion of this, and I know that, um, you've also met with some of the— my colleagues individually, um, and gotten their feedback, and I'm sure you'll continue to do that before we finally draft something.

716
01:25:30.136 --> 01:25:35.797
<v Olivia Clark>Let me first turn it over to my vice thank you, Chairwoman Clark.

717
01:25:36.056 --> 01:25:39.563
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you all for the presentation, and I'll get right to it.

718
01:25:39.771 --> 01:25:46.837
<v Loretta Smith>What protections or transition opportunities could be available for workers displaced by this new technology?

719
01:25:50.569 --> 01:25:53.559
<v Jacob Sherman>Yeah, um, thanks, uh, Councilor Smith.

720
01:25:53.979 --> 01:26:06.173
<v Jacob Sherman>Uh, you know, one of the primary things that we're thinking about in this proposal is that driver support fee and using that fee in order to invest in resources that could support driver activities.

721
01:26:06.238 --> 01:26:12.773
<v Jacob Sherman>That could be retraining, that could be scholarships, that could be other small business support.

722
01:26:12.885 --> 01:26:18.681
<v Jacob Sherman>I mean, there's a variety of different activities that we could look to stand up.

723
01:26:18.922 --> 01:26:24.172
<v Jacob Sherman>This is, I think, something we'd be looking very closely to you all to give us some guidance and some direction on.

724
01:26:24.622 --> 01:26:34.457
<v Jacob Sherman>Just as you gave us guidance and direction on the Driver Resource Center, this is something that is, pun intended, very much outside of our lane as a transportation agency.

725
01:26:34.569 --> 01:26:38.708
<v Jacob Sherman>And we'd be looking to you to help us understand how to best program those resources.

726
01:26:40.168 --> 01:26:48.896
<v Jacob Sherman>It is also the kind of thing we could go out to RFP with a variety of different potential providers in order to deliver those resources.

727
01:26:49.730 --> 01:27:17.613
<v Loretta Smith>We've started some kind of preliminary modeling and forecasting on what those and to the interim PBOT director, I, I appreciate that, but have you all evaluated the potential economic impact on Portland residents who currently work as a rideshare taxi or professional driver?

728
01:27:17.694 --> 01:27:25.319
<v Loretta Smith>Because I am concerned that we're going to put a lot of folks out of work in this transportation industry?

729
01:27:26.155 --> 01:27:26.817
<v Shoshana Cohen>Thank you for the question.

730
01:27:28.662 --> 01:27:35.414
<v Shoshana Cohen>And I'm not sure if you were directing that to the interim director who is in the room, although still getting up to speed on this.

731
01:27:35.463 --> 01:27:37.220
<v Shoshana Cohen>So if it's okay, I'll answer.

732
01:27:38.640 --> 01:27:39.685
<v Shoshana Cohen>Yes.

733
01:27:40.587 --> 01:27:48.590
<v Shoshana Cohen>Well, I just wanted to add one of the other things is really the limit on, you know, we're proposing a very small fleet size and that could stay very small.

734
01:27:49.166 --> 01:27:55.578
<v Shoshana Cohen>And, you know, fundamentally, yes, this cars without drivers will replace cars with drivers.

735
01:27:55.931 --> 01:27:57.939
<v Shoshana Cohen>That will have an economic impact.

736
01:27:58.819 --> 01:28:03.891
<v Shoshana Cohen>I think the reason to bring this is not to replace drivers.

737
01:28:03.988 --> 01:28:08.402
<v Shoshana Cohen>Obviously it is because it is— it may be coming.

738
01:28:08.579 --> 01:28:11.009
<v Shoshana Cohen>And so how can we set up as thoughtfully as possible?

739
01:28:11.349 --> 01:28:14.813
<v Shoshana Cohen>But there's no way around a significant economic impact to drivers who are replaced.

740
01:28:14.860 --> 01:28:14.958
<v Shoshana Cohen>Thank you.

741
01:28:15.242 --> 01:28:20.911
<v Shoshana Cohen>And as Jacob already said, to some degree, some of that is outside of our policy lane.

742
01:28:21.328 --> 01:28:25.858
<v Shoshana Cohen>So we're trying to propose thoughtful regulations within that context.

743
01:28:26.002 --> 01:28:27.335
<v Shoshana Cohen>But yes, there will be an impact.

744
01:28:27.382 --> 01:28:36.954
<v Loretta Smith>But the City of Portland does have a policy lane to make sure that certain industries and industries in the city are not impacted by the policies that we create.

745
01:28:37.789 --> 01:28:41.725
<v Loretta Smith>And for, you know, I'll tell you a couple of things, and this is just my bias.

746
01:28:42.287 --> 01:28:44.118
<v Loretta Smith>I am concerned about the safety issues.

747
01:28:44.872 --> 01:29:05.074
<v Loretta Smith>I'm concerned that the elderly who, uh, who need transportation, that they will not get that extra push in an ice storm of don't walk on this sidewalk, or I can try to get you closer, and you can actually identify potential problems for, for riders who, um, who may use this, uh, new technology.

748
01:29:05.588 --> 01:29:07.934
<v Loretta Smith>But I am really concerned about that.

749
01:29:08.014 --> 01:29:20.470
<v Loretta Smith>I'm concerned that, you know, we're trying to create Some sort of tax to do a driver's education piece, but that's not good enough because people are going to be losing their jobs.

750
01:29:21.162 --> 01:29:24.657
<v Loretta Smith>And I think it's going to— this will have some sort of impact.

751
01:29:24.784 --> 01:29:37.287
<v Loretta Smith>And Elon Musk put out a— there were— there's a whole fleet of new autonomous drivers, and he's, you know, these folks can work because you don't have those limits.

752
01:29:37.335 --> 01:29:37.414
<v Loretta Smith>Yeah.

753
01:29:38.951 --> 01:29:43.381
<v Loretta Smith>These, these, this technology allows the cars to be used 24 hours a day.

754
01:29:44.842 --> 01:29:50.768
<v Loretta Smith>So if you're a human, you cannot compete with that kind of, of work product.

755
01:29:51.667 --> 01:30:02.039
<v Loretta Smith>So I, I would like us to at least be a little— I mean, I'm— I was listening to your presentations, but it didn't seem like you all really cared about that to me.

756
01:30:06.420 --> 01:30:08.762
<v Shoshana Cohen>Yeah, I guess thank you for that feedback.

757
01:30:08.827 --> 01:30:13.847
<v Shoshana Cohen>Yeah, we, we are very much aware of it and don't disagree with any of those things.

758
01:30:13.960 --> 01:30:14.778
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Councilor Smith.

759
01:30:14.826 --> 01:30:16.494
<v Olivia Clark>I think we all have those concerns.

760
01:30:16.671 --> 01:30:22.398
<v Olivia Clark>I think though, if we don't do something and we're preempted by the state, then those drivers are SOL anyway.

761
01:30:22.846 --> 01:30:32.197
<v Olivia Clark>You know, I think that we're trying to get a handle on it so that we might provide some protection and some resources for those people that may be So that's part of the goal here.

762
01:30:33.350 --> 01:30:35.016
<v Olivia Clark>Um, Councilor Koyama, are you done?

763
01:30:35.529 --> 01:30:36.377
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Koyama Lane.

764
01:30:37.676 --> 01:30:38.349
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you, Chair.

765
01:30:38.653 --> 01:30:40.224
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you, Vice Chair, for that.

766
01:30:40.655 --> 01:30:49.019
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I do want to say I see that all of you are doing your jobs and you're approaching this thoughtfully and you're trying really hard to do that.

767
01:30:49.148 --> 01:30:53.121
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I understand that we have concerns about being preempted at the state.

768
01:30:53.618 --> 01:30:59.337
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Um, we also don't want to like restart policy timeline if new councilors are taking positions in January.

769
01:31:00.108 --> 01:31:09.998
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Um, and I also am more aligned with Vice Chair Smith in concerns around safety, surveillance.

770
01:31:10.143 --> 01:31:12.215
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'm also opening our roads to billionaires.

771
01:31:13.113 --> 01:31:21.350
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'm worried about, rather than letting some little bit in and seeing what happens, I'm worried about what will happen.

772
01:31:21.462 --> 01:31:24.755
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And, and I, I am more wanting to start with no.

773
01:31:25.319 --> 01:31:29.809
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And then see what happens and then go from there.

774
01:31:30.405 --> 01:31:32.247
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I do have a couple questions.

775
01:31:34.460 --> 01:31:37.828
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Like, one is, this is connected to Policy Concept 4.

776
01:31:38.037 --> 01:31:48.877
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'm wondering if you all can speak to how the city would plan to address in real time issues like AVs blocking an emergency vehicle from accessing someone in distress.

777
01:31:51.905 --> 01:31:58.454
<v Jacob Sherman>Thanks, Councilor Koyama Lane, and appreciate your opening comment about us being thoughtful and working hard to do our jobs.

778
01:31:59.515 --> 01:32:21.069
<v Jacob Sherman>You know, I think this is something where we have kind of within the agency a bunch of regulatory enforcement staff that are on a regular basis taking taxi rides, taking Uber and Lyft rides, going out to the airport, making sure that people are permitted, making sure that the vehicles don't have substantial wear and tear or damage to them.

779
01:32:21.743 --> 01:32:28.462
<v Jacob Sherman>And so we would probably be using some of those regulatory enforcement specialists to be out monitoring these kinds of things.

780
01:32:29.698 --> 01:32:39.689
<v Jacob Sherman>We need to have further discussions with the City Attorney's Office about how we can build cases to take potential regulatory action.

781
01:32:39.784 --> 01:32:48.317
<v Jacob Sherman>One thing that we've heard from our colleagues in California as well as Texas is that social media is often the place you hear about some of these incidents first.

782
01:32:48.429 --> 01:32:48.524
<v Jacob Sherman>Yeah.

783
01:32:49.182 --> 01:33:01.329
<v Jacob Sherman>And so I think one thing we're very interested in is how might we use some of that information as part of developing a potential violation or a code or a package that we could then take action on.

784
01:33:01.442 --> 01:33:06.640
<v Jacob Sherman>And so we have some more work to do there, but that's kind of preliminary how we're thinking about this.

785
01:33:07.234 --> 01:33:14.729
<v Jacob Sherman>You know, when the City of Portland first had e-scooters arrive in our city, it wasn't because we wanted them or invited them.

786
01:33:14.936 --> 01:33:18.770
<v Jacob Sherman>It was because we also found out that companies were coming and getting ready to deploy them.

787
01:33:19.587 --> 01:33:28.516
<v Jacob Sherman>And we kind of developed a very similar approach, took a policy, created a policy framework, told the companies they had to wait, told the companies that they had to come and play by the rule.

788
01:33:28.645 --> 01:33:34.271
<v Jacob Sherman>And then we had staff working on this on a daily basis and picking up the phone and solving some of those problems.

789
01:33:34.657 --> 01:33:36.773
<v Jacob Sherman>We'd be taking a very similar approach here.

790
01:33:36.900 --> 01:33:41.998
<v Jacob Sherman>It would be very hands-on for probably the first year or more, or the first few years.

791
01:33:44.438 --> 01:33:49.779
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I had another question about fees, maybe per trip fees, or if we're going to do per mile fees.

792
01:33:50.036 --> 01:34:01.956
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I'm wondering if there's been any consideration about having higher fees for certain vehicles that are maybe taller or heavier, lower price for ones that are shorter, lighter vehicles.

793
01:34:02.003 --> 01:34:08.356
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And we know that smaller, lighter vehicles are safer, and just wondering if there's been any conversation around that.

794
01:34:08.404 --> 01:34:08.564
<v Mitch Green>Thank you.

795
01:34:08.985 --> 01:34:15.186
<v Shoshana Cohen>You know, those are all good questions, and I think some initial thoughts.

796
01:34:15.364 --> 01:34:17.649
<v Shoshana Cohen>Those are things that could absolutely be considered.

797
01:34:17.811 --> 01:34:23.137
<v Shoshana Cohen>You know, again, might make sense across the private-for-hire industry, but absolutely could be considered.

798
01:34:24.842 --> 01:34:32.536
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And has there been any community engagement related to the recommendations, and what has that been like, and can you tell us about that?

799
01:34:33.329 --> 01:34:40.314
<v Shoshana Cohen>Yeah, well, yeah, I think it's fair to say we've been doing engagement this whole year, maybe, at different levels.

800
01:34:40.572 --> 01:34:51.551
<v Shoshana Cohen>And, you know, we did sort of the— went through the official administrative rule engagement process, had a public hearing, put the rules out far and wide, met with individual groups.

801
01:34:52.033 --> 01:34:57.018
<v Shoshana Cohen>We've continued to do sort of ongoing stakeholder engagement.

802
01:34:57.082 --> 01:35:03.559
<v Shoshana Cohen>We've met, you know, just in the last couple weeks, we met with some of the regular transportation advocacy groups and other groups.

803
01:35:03.622 --> 01:35:03.958
<v Shoshana Cohen>Thank you.

804
01:35:04.216 --> 01:35:19.523
<v Shoshana Cohen>Like Disability Rights Oregon and folks sort of continuing to try to take people's temperature and continue to hear lots and lots of reservations and also concern about what might happen if it were to be done at the state level.

805
01:35:19.570 --> 01:35:22.889
<v Shoshana Cohen>So I think we're— we continue to hear similar things, I think.

806
01:35:23.530 --> 01:35:25.293
<v Shoshana Cohen>But yeah, I don't know what else you all want to say about it.

807
01:35:25.453 --> 01:35:37.309
<v Jacob Sherman>And maybe just to underline a specific piece of engagement, you know, we also working on broader private-for-hire issues including Uber and Lyft issues, we meet regularly with the Oregon Drivers Union and their representatives.

808
01:35:37.421 --> 01:35:50.926
<v Jacob Sherman>We've got a standing monthly meeting, and this is a topic that we discuss often and have, I think in the last 2 months, have probably discussed it 2 or 3 times, including an hour and a half session a week and a half ago.

809
01:35:52.016 --> 01:35:57.300
<v Jacob Sherman>So I think in many ways we know some of those concerns.

810
01:35:57.717 --> 01:35:59.564
<v Jacob Sherman>I think some of those concerns are definitely shared.

811
01:35:59.613 --> 01:35:59.756
<v Jacob Sherman>Thank you.

812
01:36:00.365 --> 01:36:14.296
<v Jacob Sherman>And as Chair Clark said, I think we're trying to put forward what we consider to be kind of a nationally leading framework that is going to hopefully solve the vast majority of the problems.

813
01:36:14.890 --> 01:36:17.582
<v Jacob Sherman>It might not be perfect, but it might be really good.

814
01:36:18.657 --> 01:36:30.534
<v Shoshana Cohen>And maybe just last thing on that point, just again, we've met with some people in the last week or so and have heard some additional specific recommendations which haven't yet been incorporated, but absolutely could be.

815
01:36:30.984 --> 01:36:39.305
<v Shoshana Cohen>So we're still, So this is sort of, I think, if this keeps moving, which maybe it will not, but if it does, feel like it's sort of a continuous conversation.

816
01:36:39.402 --> 01:36:42.625
<v Shoshana Cohen>And know there's some other specific proposals out there as well.

817
01:36:43.106 --> 01:36:48.173
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I want to acknowledge the commitment to community engagement and that you all are open and are continuing to do that.

818
01:36:48.238 --> 01:36:49.841
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>That's really important.

819
01:36:50.868 --> 01:37:02.643
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And for me personally, it's unclear if there's— if this moving forward, if AVs would benefit Vision Zero Portland values, age-friendly values.

820
01:37:02.850 --> 01:37:17.012
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'm not saying that's what you all are saying here, but what I'm— where I'm at is that even if we have strong policies in place, I'm worried about introducing untested technology onto our roads that are going to mix with pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers.

821
01:37:18.073 --> 01:37:22.697
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I keep hearing from constituents that they are worried when they see the different Waymos around.

822
01:37:22.810 --> 01:37:23.547
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I feel the same way.

823
01:37:23.708 --> 01:37:26.970
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>They just feel creepy when I see them.

824
01:37:27.115 --> 01:37:33.479
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I would like us to have a frank conversation about what it looks like to really just say no to AVs in Portland.

825
01:37:33.957 --> 01:37:34.680
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'll leave it there for now.

826
01:37:36.416 --> 01:37:37.685
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Councilor Koyama Lane.

827
01:37:38.184 --> 01:37:45.529
<v Olivia Clark>I seem to recall that one of the, um, one of the things that you heard in your outreach that was at the top of the list was safety.

828
01:37:45.935 --> 01:37:48.787
<v Olivia Clark>I thought that was sort of the universal concern, was safety.

829
01:37:49.726 --> 01:37:50.650
<v Olivia Clark>Thanks for those questions.

830
01:37:50.779 --> 01:37:51.121
<v Olivia Clark>Excellent.

831
01:37:51.202 --> 01:37:51.898
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Kanal.

832
01:37:53.289 --> 01:37:54.109
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Chair Clark.

833
01:37:54.654 --> 01:37:55.569
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks everybody for being here.

834
01:37:55.634 --> 01:37:56.757
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you for all your work.

835
01:37:57.063 --> 01:38:00.483
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, I'm obviously a critic of this industry and, and this proposal.

836
01:38:00.676 --> 01:38:06.054
<v Sameer Kanal>I want to be clear that I think that the work that you've done is what you've been asked to do, uh, and that you've done a good job of it.

837
01:38:06.215 --> 01:38:09.586
<v Sameer Kanal>And nothing I say going forward is, is a criticism of either you or your work.

838
01:38:10.229 --> 01:38:14.371
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, and all my questions and comments are for the 3 people up here, just to get— be clear.

839
01:38:14.885 --> 01:38:16.201
<v Sameer Kanal>One quick question before I start.

840
01:38:16.345 --> 01:38:24.280
<v Sameer Kanal>The guidance to staff that this entire project sort of started from in terms of authorization to pursue this is the resolution in 2017, right?

841
01:38:25.057 --> 01:38:27.309
<v Sameer Kanal>This all kind of stems from that 2017 resolution?

842
01:38:29.536 --> 01:38:31.516
<v Shoshana Cohen>We had a standing administrative rule.

843
01:38:31.645 --> 01:38:41.581
<v Shoshana Cohen>So I think when we heard that AVs were becoming active again in Oregon, we knew that that rule needed to be updated.

844
01:38:41.774 --> 01:38:44.444
<v Shoshana Cohen>It was, I don't know, 8 years old or something like that at that point.

845
01:38:45.935 --> 01:38:53.795
<v Shoshana Cohen>And since it was on the books as a testing permit, we needed to sort of start there and look at what we needed to do.

846
01:38:56.060 --> 01:38:57.721
<v Jacob Sherman>Yeah, and I think that's correct.

847
01:38:58.011 --> 01:39:02.064
<v Jacob Sherman>As Shoshana was saying, we have an existing administrative rule on the books.

848
01:39:02.225 --> 01:39:10.119
<v Jacob Sherman>That administrative rule on the books is undergirded by that resolution, the Smart Autonomous Vehicle Initiative resolution from 2017.

849
01:39:10.881 --> 01:39:30.432
<v Jacob Sherman>And I think the, The SAVI resolution is undergirded by our broader kind of charter and the authorities that are granted to us as the steward of the right-of-way, which we use to then regulate, in this instance, not just proposed automated vehicles, but also shuttles and taxis and limousines.

850
01:39:31.252 --> 01:39:37.000
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah, I was mostly referring not to the authorization to come up with ideas, but the sort of directional element of it there.

851
01:39:38.028 --> 01:39:48.212
<v Sameer Kanal>I personally respectfully disagree with the chair, uh, in saying it's important that we send a signal to the state legislature that we're invested in ensuring the safe operation of these vehicles in the city.

852
01:39:48.438 --> 01:39:53.320
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm interested in ensuring the safe operations of vehicles, but not these vehicles.

853
01:39:53.514 --> 01:39:58.542
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, I agree with the idea that if we don't do something, there's a problem because the state will do their thing.

854
01:39:59.039 --> 01:39:59.426
<v Sameer Kanal>That's true.

855
01:39:59.537 --> 01:40:00.550
<v Sameer Kanal>I think we should just ban it.

856
01:40:00.662 --> 01:40:01.497
<v Sameer Kanal>That's doing something.

857
01:40:02.172 --> 01:40:07.661
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, and I will personally commit to spending time in Salem to, to help with That, um, to the degree that it is, it is helpful.

858
01:40:08.270 --> 01:40:15.305
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, you know, we've heard several times things like we've heard or citations on safety from industry-funded studies.

859
01:40:15.738 --> 01:40:37.546
<v Sameer Kanal>I've still not seen, and I've asked, and if anyone watching this would love to email it to me, I would love a, a, a study that is proven to not be industry-funded that actually shows anything about, uh, safety in the, um, in the long term and not just the part where there's someone in the vehicle But the overall, since these vehicles are just circling the cities that they're in even when they don't have passengers.

860
01:40:39.268 --> 01:40:44.841
<v Sameer Kanal>I floated an amendment to replace all proposed text with, quote, all vehicles require a human driver, end quote.

861
01:40:44.936 --> 01:40:45.694
<v Sameer Kanal>It's 6 words long.

862
01:40:45.791 --> 01:40:46.854
<v Sameer Kanal>Everyone can understand it.

863
01:40:47.159 --> 01:41:02.386
<v Sameer Kanal>Today I realize we may also need to add one other thing to that amendment, which is a repeal of Resolution 37296 to change the direction that we're giving to staff On this and should probably also override the administrative rule that Shoshana just referenced.

864
01:41:03.155 --> 01:41:09.789
<v Sameer Kanal>I want to acknowledge that the drivers union has been reaching out and I, you know, we, they've asked for human safety operators.

865
01:41:10.559 --> 01:41:13.475
<v Sameer Kanal>This provides needed access and assistance to people with disabilities.

866
01:41:14.085 --> 01:41:18.796
<v Sameer Kanal>That is an important part of this conversation regardless of whether these are autonomous vehicles or not.

867
01:41:18.876 --> 01:41:22.208
<v Sameer Kanal>That is one of the functions of the human operator of a vehicle.

868
01:41:22.882 --> 01:41:29.543
<v Sameer Kanal>There are countless safety scenarios that a computer cannot navigate, and a human safety operator ensures accountability and safety.

869
01:41:29.623 --> 01:41:32.319
<v Sameer Kanal>This is similar to what Minneapolis put in as well.

870
01:41:32.993 --> 01:41:37.664
<v Sameer Kanal>I will note that because the mayor vetoed it there, mayor can't veto here, so there's slight differences there.

871
01:41:37.809 --> 01:41:43.234
<v Sameer Kanal>But I do think that it is slightly less preferable than a ban, but I wanted to put that on the table.

872
01:41:44.212 --> 01:41:48.368
<v Sameer Kanal>Looking at the policy concepts, I really appreciate the work that you've done on the definitions.

873
01:41:48.721 --> 01:41:51.819
<v Sameer Kanal>One, as well as on the concept of US driver's licenses.

874
01:41:52.556 --> 01:41:57.161
<v Sameer Kanal>I think the numbers of 7 and 8 got swapped, so I don't remember which one it is, but the driver's licenses one.

875
01:41:58.011 --> 01:42:11.423
<v Sameer Kanal>I have no concern about the idea of setting fleet caps and authority to do so, but they're way too lax with 100 vehicles per company and then allowing the mayor to effectively waive them after 2 years by setting a large fleet cap.

876
01:42:12.130 --> 01:42:21.337
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm also concerned that the concept of an impact I think the impact fees creates a financial incentive to give away Portlanders' privacy and seems like a clear attempt to get the support of the drivers union.

877
01:42:21.402 --> 01:42:26.623
<v Sameer Kanal>But I want to note we can fund the Drivers Resource Center without this particular source of revenue.

878
01:42:27.203 --> 01:42:27.752
<v Sameer Kanal>We have to.

879
01:42:29.856 --> 01:42:31.354
<v Sameer Kanal>I wish we'd done a testing permit.

880
01:42:31.869 --> 01:42:32.868
<v Sameer Kanal>Concept 3 is great.

881
01:42:32.917 --> 01:42:34.818
<v Sameer Kanal>I just wish we'd done it in 2017.

882
01:42:35.896 --> 01:42:38.006
<v Sameer Kanal>I do want to spend a little time on 5 and 6.

883
01:42:38.699 --> 01:42:49.265
<v Sameer Kanal>The loading and unloading and bicycle lanes piece I appreciate the note, Hannah, you raised on the other option, but I think that the other option kind of proves why this is a bad idea.

884
01:42:49.329 --> 01:43:06.479
<v Sameer Kanal>Because although disallowing stopping in bicycle lanes might have negative effects on safety and mobility, that's also kind of upside down because mobility includes bicycles that are prevented from navigating effectively if there's an autonomous vehicle or any vehicle.

885
01:43:06.542 --> 01:43:06.654
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

886
01:43:07.055 --> 01:43:07.890
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, in a bike lane.

887
01:43:07.954 --> 01:43:08.965
<v Sameer Kanal>Same thing for safety.

888
01:43:10.024 --> 01:43:15.238
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, but I really want to spend time on Concept 6, which is the thing that proves why this can't work.

889
01:43:15.654 --> 01:43:17.659
<v Sameer Kanal>A regulatory structure cannot work.

890
01:43:18.206 --> 01:43:29.659
<v Sameer Kanal>There is no way to honor the, quote, reasonable expectation of privacy that Portlanders have, end quote, with 250 at first and eventually an unlimited number of rolling surveillance vehicles on the ground.

891
01:43:30.012 --> 01:43:39.131
<v Sameer Kanal>Pair this with the forthcoming administrative push to allow cameras in every inch of our sky with Amazon's drone facility, and we're building a surveillance state here even faster than Washington, D.C. is.

892
01:43:40.368 --> 01:43:42.181
<v Sameer Kanal>The policy concept is unenforceable.

893
01:43:42.295 --> 01:43:52.219
<v Sameer Kanal>The only way to guarantee non-transfer of data is to not create it in the first place and will inevitably result in both private companies using it and transfers to ICE and other malign actors.

894
01:43:53.118 --> 01:43:58.208
<v Sameer Kanal>Specifically, the proposal is to put it into administrative rules, which gives no accountability to the public for any changes.

895
01:43:58.914 --> 01:44:05.681
<v Sameer Kanal>The idea that administrative rules will be changed to allow unfettered surveillance is already being acknowledged yes.

896
01:44:06.150 --> 01:44:18.743
<v Sameer Kanal>You know, it was acknowledged that, quote, city code, as you might know, is generally reserved for policies that are bigger picture and more foundational and durable rather than kind of fine-grained implementation things that might need to change in the future, such as administrative rules.

897
01:44:19.956 --> 01:44:30.644
<v Sameer Kanal>So I just want to put this out there that the mayor will be able to waive that at any point in the future and allow us to have unfettered transfer of thank you.

898
01:44:31.927 --> 01:44:36.841
<v Sameer Kanal>And the drivers union raised this issue in their letter as well, and I, I really appreciate that.

899
01:44:37.291 --> 01:44:38.800
<v Sameer Kanal>Councilor Smith, I agree completely.

900
01:44:38.849 --> 01:44:40.646
<v Sameer Kanal>There's nothing in here on protecting workers.

901
01:44:41.225 --> 01:44:50.890
<v Sameer Kanal>The discussion about the fees that came from that made it clear that, that the idea from the companies, not from staff, but from the companies, is to promote large-scale worker displacement of an entire industry.

902
01:44:51.516 --> 01:44:54.777
<v Sameer Kanal>And I'm personally not interested in assisting in the unemployment of any workforce.

903
01:44:55.194 --> 01:45:06.806
<v Sameer Kanal>And I should note, it's particularly important when we're discussing a workforce that So with all that said, I want to be very clear about my ask here.

904
01:45:07.033 --> 01:45:14.327
<v Sameer Kanal>I am begging my colleagues not to actively support the creation of a dystopia in our city.

905
01:45:14.761 --> 01:45:21.078
<v Sameer Kanal>Between the drone conversation and this, those are both really important parts of that.

906
01:45:21.600 --> 01:45:25.015
<v Sameer Kanal>And so I ask for support in changing the direction here and not supporting this.

907
01:45:25.064 --> 01:45:25.260
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

908
01:45:25.309 --> 01:45:25.488
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

909
01:45:26.260 --> 01:45:27.966
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Councilor.

910
01:45:30.789 --> 01:45:33.791
<v Olivia Clark>And you're certainly welcome to offer amendments on the policies as well.

911
01:45:34.936 --> 01:45:35.550
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Green.

912
01:45:36.309 --> 01:45:37.615
<v Mitch Green>Thank you, Chair Clark.

913
01:45:39.270 --> 01:45:44.565
<v Mitch Green>I'm just going to echo the 3 of my colleagues who spoke before me all hit on my primary concerns.

914
01:45:45.010 --> 01:45:51.042
<v Mitch Green>I do want to talk about the— you guys have been very well engaged with my office.

915
01:45:51.833 --> 01:46:07.590
<v Mitch Green>I think that that you're bringing a deep desire to build a policy given the guidance that you've received and within the sort of context of trying to avoid a world where we get preempted and then lose control of the situation.

916
01:46:07.637 --> 01:46:08.920
<v Mitch Green>So I want to acknowledge that.

917
01:46:10.282 --> 01:46:15.634
<v Mitch Green>I think that I have a higher risk tolerance for taking that fight on.

918
01:46:15.987 --> 01:46:23.877
<v Mitch Green>Like, you know, I think the person who championed the bill last time represents cities in Washington County.

919
01:46:23.989 --> 01:46:29.658
<v Mitch Green>And I'll note that Washington County has revolted against AI data farms and the like.

920
01:46:29.724 --> 01:46:34.487
<v Mitch Green>And so I don't know that the political appetite is there to continue to pursue that.

921
01:46:34.583 --> 01:46:35.929
<v Mitch Green>And so we'll see how that fight goes.

922
01:46:36.720 --> 01:46:58.110
<v Mitch Green>But there's one thing I wanna uplift that we haven't really talked about a little bit is that, you know, I also share some skepticism of industry-funded studies, but it's probably true that on a per-trip basis in isolation, these autonomous vehicle trips are safer on average than others.

923
01:46:58.786 --> 01:47:00.264
<v Mitch Green>But that's not really the stakes.

924
01:47:00.313 --> 01:47:08.172
<v Mitch Green>The stakes are whether we are producing better or worse outcomes in terms of safety for the system as a whole.

925
01:47:08.286 --> 01:47:10.729
<v Mitch Green>So this is a holistic greater than the sum of its parts problem.

926
01:47:11.408 --> 01:47:18.493
<v Mitch Green>And what you also find in these studies is, is robotaxis or AVs generate increased VMT.

927
01:47:18.960 --> 01:47:20.180
<v Mitch Green>So that's vehicle miles traveled.

928
01:47:20.726 --> 01:47:24.439
<v Mitch Green>And that's particularly exacerbated in a situation where there's no place to park.

929
01:47:25.145 --> 01:47:38.333
<v Mitch Green>And because the City of Portland doesn't have the appetite to appropriately price on-street parking to disincentivize storing a car basically for free in the public right-of-way, Okay.

930
01:47:38.958 --> 01:47:46.045
<v Mitch Green>And then we have a lot of places downtown in particular where it's like, this is valet parking, this is loading and unloading just for trucks.

931
01:47:46.109 --> 01:47:50.117
<v Mitch Green>And so there's not a lot of extra space to just pull over and park for a bit.

932
01:47:50.436 --> 01:47:53.884
<v Mitch Green>You're gonna get way more deadheading and a lot more vehicle miles traveled.

933
01:47:54.509 --> 01:48:05.872
<v Mitch Green>And that may actually result in increasing safety risks faster than it does the sort of reduction on the, Kind of like driver versus robot lens.

934
01:48:05.985 --> 01:48:10.680
<v Mitch Green>And so they— this is a problem that can only really be ascertained with more data.

935
01:48:10.777 --> 01:48:15.612
<v Mitch Green>And I would suggest that— I'm not sure that's a risk I want to take.

936
01:48:15.773 --> 01:48:18.488
<v Mitch Green>I support Councilor Kanal's sort of direction here.

937
01:48:18.698 --> 01:48:21.978
<v Mitch Green>It's the only place where we can talk about that more than 1 or 2 people at a time.

938
01:48:22.025 --> 01:48:24.203
<v Mitch Green>So that's the appetite that I have.

939
01:48:24.347 --> 01:48:33.889
<v Mitch Green>But if we can't, if we can't do an outright ban, I think my My next best option is the human safety operator.

940
01:48:34.514 --> 01:48:51.323
<v Mitch Green>And I feel like if you want AVs in Portland because you want to have experienced the sort of potential that they are a safer trip for you, that should still be true with the safety officer in the seat.

941
01:48:51.404 --> 01:48:57.548
<v Mitch Green>And so if we have to go some sort of direction that's Less than a ban, that's the direction I want to go.

942
01:48:58.078 --> 01:49:05.534
<v Mitch Green>Um, I, I also, I, I want to laud your focus on minimizing the time that's in the bike lanes.

943
01:49:05.728 --> 01:49:15.962
<v Mitch Green>I want to extend that to, um, you know, to the extent that we can, uh, prevent them from idling in, in, in, uh, daylight at intersections too, because that's, I mean, the biggest threat to pedestrian safety.

944
01:49:16.011 --> 01:49:17.618
<v Mitch Green>So I'll leave it there for now.

945
01:49:18.020 --> 01:49:18.261
<v Olivia Clark>Thanks.

946
01:49:19.530 --> 01:49:20.559
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Councilor Green.

947
01:49:21.056 --> 01:49:28.908
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, colleagues, we're really at time, so I'm going to make some concluding remarks here and then we'll take a break, if that's okay with everybody.

948
01:49:29.421 --> 01:49:46.088
<v Olivia Clark>First of all, I just want to thank the team again for all the work that you've put into this, how responsive that you've been to everyone, how you've tried to, um, take into consideration all the things that the other cities have told you, um, about what it's like to be preempted.

949
01:49:46.523 --> 01:49:50.775
<v Olivia Clark>And you've tried to design the best package that you possibly can to protect us.

950
01:49:51.561 --> 01:49:56.634
<v Olivia Clark>Um, I think, uh, Councilor Kanal's comment about dystopian future— I, I don't want that either.

951
01:49:57.179 --> 01:50:03.181
<v Olivia Clark>I'm— let's be really clear that I'm not supportive of Waymo being here either, or whatever company.

952
01:50:03.840 --> 01:50:12.730
<v Olivia Clark>Um, but I'm also— I've worked in the legislature most of my career and fought preemption, and I'm quite concerned that we will be preempted.

953
01:50:13.389 --> 01:50:20.076
<v Olivia Clark>And I feel like the canary in the coal mine sometimes here, but we have 15 other cities to learn from.

954
01:50:20.140 --> 01:50:32.247
<v Olivia Clark>And if we could be the city that actually designed something that worked, imperfect as it may be, and prevent the state legislature from taking away our power, I think that's the direction we could go.

955
01:50:32.729 --> 01:50:37.828
<v Olivia Clark>But clearly, I think I'm— I could be outvoted here, but I'm going to keep trying.

956
01:50:38.261 --> 01:50:47.171
<v Olivia Clark>Because I think that, um, if you really believe that, um, the legislature won't preempt us, then you win, and that's great, and I think that's super.

957
01:50:47.636 --> 01:51:01.351
<v Olivia Clark>If they do, uh, I think that you all ought to start working on getting a governor's veto after the election, because I think the composition of the legislature, even though it's changing and maybe getting better in some people's opinion, I think that we will lose this debate.

958
01:51:01.431 --> 01:51:15.265
<v Olivia Clark>So we need to prepare for it, and I thought this was the best way for to prepare for it, to design the best package we could based on what other cities have experienced when they've been preempted and don't get any data, don't get money, they get nothing.

959
01:51:16.516 --> 01:51:19.342
<v Olivia Clark>So I was hoping that we could actually get something out of this.

960
01:51:19.408 --> 01:51:23.838
<v Olivia Clark>But in any event, we will, we will continue this conversation.

961
01:51:23.886 --> 01:51:30.567
<v Olivia Clark>We will draft something that is the best thing we can do, bring that back in 2 weeks, and we'll see how the chair feels about that.

962
01:51:30.631 --> 01:51:30.774
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

963
01:51:31.752 --> 01:51:32.673
<v Olivia Clark>So thank you, everybody.

964
01:51:32.738 --> 01:51:37.284
<v Olivia Clark>Thanks for your excellent comments, the work that you did on going through all the concepts.

965
01:51:37.333 --> 01:51:38.886
<v Olivia Clark>I really appreciate that very much.

966
01:51:39.210 --> 01:51:40.115
<v Olivia Clark>And thanks to the staff.

967
01:51:40.539 --> 01:51:43.231
<v Olivia Clark>So let's take a 10-minute break.

968
01:51:43.457 --> 01:51:45.618
<v Olivia Clark>Um, why don't we come back here at 11:26?

969
01:51:50.045 --> 01:51:51.173
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

970
02:05:47.944 --> 02:05:49.271
<v Olivia Clark>All right, we have a quorum.

971
02:05:49.350 --> 02:05:52.845
<v Olivia Clark>So let's go ahead and, um, let's see.

972
02:05:52.942 --> 02:05:56.356
<v Olivia Clark>Diana, would you please read the next item?

973
02:05:57.819 --> 02:06:14.345
<v Unidentified speaker>Item number 3, document number 2026-364, amend transportation fee schedule to establish an event parking rate within the Lloyd Event District and Zone V parking permit area.

974
02:06:14.673 --> 02:06:20.974
<v Olivia Clark>Amend thank you so much.

975
02:06:21.394 --> 02:06:28.295
<v Olivia Clark>So colleagues, this legislation is to address parking issues in the Lloyd Event District during events at the Moda Center.

976
02:06:29.019 --> 02:06:35.565
<v Olivia Clark>I think they've impacted neighborhood residents and their ability to find their own parking during peak events.

977
02:06:37.420 --> 02:06:38.733
<v Olivia Clark>And is this your district, Councilor?

978
02:06:38.895 --> 02:06:39.576
<v Olivia Clark>It is your district.

979
02:06:39.623 --> 02:06:40.320
<v Loretta Smith>Mm-hmm.

980
02:06:41.027 --> 02:06:43.466
<v Olivia Clark>With that, let me just hand this off to PBOT staff.

981
02:06:43.612 --> 02:06:44.606
<v Olivia Clark>Glad to see you here.

982
02:06:45.521 --> 02:06:47.287
<v Olivia Clark>Kristen, are you here to kick it off?

983
02:06:47.448 --> 02:06:48.604
<v Kristen Hall>I am.

984
02:06:48.668 --> 02:06:54.545
<v Kristen Hall>For the record, I'm Kristen Hall, PBOT's Interim Director for Planning Programs and Projects.

985
02:06:54.609 --> 02:06:58.381
<v Kristen Hall>I'm here with Raylee Stark, our Parking District Project Manager.

986
02:06:58.927 --> 02:07:06.907
<v Kristen Hall>We're here to discuss an ordinance to amend the transportation fee schedule to adjust the hourly rate in the Zone B permit area in the Eliot neighborhood.

987
02:07:08.078 --> 02:07:15.689
<v Kristen Hall>As we dive in, I want to acknowledge the many people at PBOT who work on parking districts, including our parking operations team, especially Erica Neville and Kristen Aldrin.

988
02:07:16.059 --> 02:07:20.090
<v Kristen Hall>I think they're here in the back, as well as our meter shop and parking enforcement team.

989
02:07:20.475 --> 02:07:24.296
<v Kristen Hall>It's truly a whole bureau effort to manage our parking system.

990
02:07:25.180 --> 02:07:27.765
<v Kristen Hall>I also want to acknowledge the timeliness of this ordinance.

991
02:07:28.246 --> 02:07:32.372
<v Kristen Hall>The residents of the Zone B permit area are impacted by events throughout the year.

992
02:07:32.742 --> 02:07:35.185
<v Kristen Hall>But blazer season is a particularly big deal.

993
02:07:35.634 --> 02:07:43.699
<v Kristen Hall>Given the season is kicking off, we're bringing this ordinance forward now, which would allow us to implement the changes as soon as 30 days after approval by City Council.

994
02:07:45.729 --> 02:07:46.002
<v Kristen Hall>Next slide.

995
02:07:46.324 --> 02:07:46.631
<v Kristen Hall>Thank you.

996
02:07:47.596 --> 02:07:54.132
<v Kristen Hall>We manage on-street parking because it's a limited resource where demand far exceeds supply in many parts of our city.

997
02:07:54.697 --> 02:08:03.418
<v Kristen Hall>Without management through pricing and other tools, parking spaces become impossible to find negatively impacting businesses, employees, and residents.

998
02:08:06.573 --> 02:08:08.555
<v Kristen Hall>Parking management has many benefits.

999
02:08:08.829 --> 02:08:14.567
<v Kristen Hall>It improves safety in line with our Vision Zero goals, and it ensures that customers can shop at our small businesses.

1000
02:08:15.576 --> 02:08:24.399
<v Kristen Hall>At its core, it matters because it reflects what Portlanders want: a vibrant city with thriving businesses, convenient access to services, and walkable, safe neighborhoods.

1001
02:08:25.199 --> 02:08:27.554
<v Kristen Hall>Achieving that vision requires thoughtful parking management.

1002
02:08:28.206 --> 02:08:33.078
<v Kristen Hall>And I stress the word thoughtful here because the needs of different stakeholders can be in conflict.

1003
02:08:33.493 --> 02:08:37.467
<v Kristen Hall>Successfully managing parking requires that everyone compromises a little bit.

1004
02:08:38.654 --> 02:08:41.170
<v Kristen Hall>So how do we do it?

1005
02:08:41.922 --> 02:08:45.993
<v Kristen Hall>We manage parking based on the land use context and the community's goals for an area.

1006
02:08:46.537 --> 02:08:53.716
<v Kristen Hall>For each of these contexts, we use our suite of management tools, including time limits, parking permits, and paid parking to manage that on-street parking supply.

1007
02:08:53.780 --> 02:08:54.085
<v Kristen Hall>Thank you.

1008
02:08:54.623 --> 02:09:11.158
<v Kristen Hall>When we look at a commercial Main Street like the West End, we manage parking so visitors are able to find a space when they want to visit a restaurant or shop, and we make— try to make sure each space, parking space, sees more visitors per day.

1009
02:09:13.672 --> 02:09:18.528
<v Kristen Hall>We manage parking for neighborhoods adjacent to an employment or event center, like here in the Eliot neighborhood.

1010
02:09:20.194 --> 02:09:23.215
<v Kristen Hall>To ensure that space is available for residents during events.

1011
02:09:23.568 --> 02:09:32.345
<v Kristen Hall>That means that a resident returning home from work or who needs to run to the grocery store during an event can find a place to park, even on an event night.

1012
02:09:34.479 --> 02:09:37.862
<v Kristen Hall>We manage parking in dense residential neighborhoods like Slabtown.

1013
02:09:38.521 --> 02:10:02.542
<v Kristen Hall>When parking is managed, we can continue to grow and housing can be built without unintended consequences like congestion PBOT has 5 parking districts, and in our most dense neighborhoods, we're also working with businesses and residents to establish a 6th parking district in North Northeast Portland, which should be ready for council consideration in the coming months.

1014
02:10:03.462 --> 02:10:07.783
<v Kristen Hall>Importantly, in these areas, it is not just designating an area parking district.

1015
02:10:08.363 --> 02:10:31.115
<v Kristen Hall>More importantly, it's a partnership between PBOT and the neighborhood to manage parking and make it easier to get stakeholders implement parking management tools as— or we work with stakeholders implement parking management tools, as well as making it easier to bike, walk, and take transit to create the walkable, thriving neighborhoods and business districts that Portlanders want.

1016
02:10:31.854 --> 02:10:40.270
<v Kristen Hall>So we're here today to talk about this ordinance to increase the hourly parking rates in one portion of the Eliot neighborhood where it overlaps with the Zone B permit program.

1017
02:10:40.350 --> 02:10:40.447
<v Kristen Hall>Thank you.

1018
02:10:41.137 --> 02:10:46.067
<v Kristen Hall>The mechanism to do that is an amendment to the transportation fee schedule by adding a new line item.

1019
02:10:46.387 --> 02:10:49.760
<v Kristen Hall>I'm going to pass it to Raylee to get into the specifics of the proposal.

1020
02:10:49.921 --> 02:10:51.237
<v Raylee Stark>Okay, thank you.

1021
02:10:51.912 --> 02:10:52.842
<v Raylee Stark>Good morning, councilors.

1022
02:10:53.436 --> 02:11:05.046
<v Raylee Stark>For the record, my name is Raylee Stark, and I'm a parking district project manager within the transportation planning section, and I've been working with the Eliot neighborhood for the past 3 years on their parking issues.

1023
02:11:07.721 --> 02:11:12.074
<v Raylee Stark>So to frame what we're talking about today, this is the Lloyd Event District.

1024
02:11:12.592 --> 02:11:17.382
<v Raylee Stark>It was established in 2022 to better manage parking during large events at the Moda Center.

1025
02:11:18.354 --> 02:11:26.766
<v Raylee Stark>So when there's a large event or a combination of events with 10,000 or more attendees, the district is activated and you must pay to park.

1026
02:11:28.475 --> 02:11:32.069
<v Raylee Stark>It is activated approximately 120 days or a third of the year.

1027
02:11:37.400 --> 02:11:41.247
<v Raylee Stark>Highlighted here in red is the Zone B Permit District.

1028
02:11:41.969 --> 02:11:47.627
<v Raylee Stark>This was created in 2024 to help prioritize parking for residents during large events.

1029
02:11:48.381 --> 02:11:59.841
<v Raylee Stark>And this came to fruition because there was a number of residents in the Eliot neighborhood who have been asking for years to help support them on the congestion that they are experiencing in their neighborhood.

1030
02:12:02.354 --> 02:12:07.360
<v Raylee Stark>I want to highlight that this, this program was designed for the neighborhood by the neighborhood.

1031
02:12:07.408 --> 02:12:15.301
<v Raylee Stark>So back in 2024 when it was created, a couple things I want to highlight is that there are income-based permits.

1032
02:12:15.559 --> 02:12:20.475
<v Raylee Stark>So based on your income, the rate for an annual permit is $65 or $155.

1033
02:12:22.844 --> 02:12:24.782
<v Raylee Stark>There's also guest permits.

1034
02:12:24.831 --> 02:12:33.277
<v Raylee Stark>So this was really important to the committee for caregivers and any visitors to the neighborhood to— that are regular and routine visitors.

1035
02:12:33.326 --> 02:12:39.543
<v Raylee Stark>So we have a guest permit program, and we also have nonprofit permits available because there's a number of nonprofits in the neighborhood.

1036
02:12:41.560 --> 02:12:48.161
<v Raylee Stark>So we have worked with the neighborhood for a couple of years, and since the establishment of the permit, we have been evaluating ever since.

1037
02:12:49.369 --> 02:12:51.863
<v Raylee Stark>We then added a pay-to-park to this area.

1038
02:12:51.927 --> 02:12:57.007
<v Raylee Stark>So if the— if you are not a permit holder, you must pay to park.

1039
02:12:57.234 --> 02:12:58.485
<v Raylee Stark>The current rate is $5.40.

1040
02:13:05.257 --> 02:13:15.250
<v Raylee Stark>Here on the screen is an occupancy study that was done during a Blazers and Winterhawks game in March of '26.

1041
02:13:16.671 --> 02:13:19.809
<v Raylee Stark>During this year's data collection, the peak occupancy was 96%.

1042
02:13:19.920 --> 02:13:23.502
<v Raylee Stark>96%, Which matches what we heard anecdotally from the neighborhood.

1043
02:13:23.969 --> 02:13:28.837
<v Raylee Stark>Parking is still extremely constrained, and residents are having difficulty parking during events.

1044
02:13:31.220 --> 02:13:39.956
<v Raylee Stark>As you can see from the screen, any, any block face in red is considered constrained, so 96% is really high for the neighborhood.

1045
02:13:42.743 --> 02:13:45.337
<v Raylee Stark>We talk a lot about occupancy when it comes to parking management.

1046
02:13:45.988 --> 02:13:48.596
<v Raylee Stark>And I want to show you a diagram about why this matters.

1047
02:13:50.869 --> 02:13:59.694
<v Raylee Stark>So the peak occupancy in Eliot was 96%, which is— which means that some blocks were actually 100% and you could not find a space anywhere.

1048
02:14:01.449 --> 02:14:13.086
<v Raylee Stark>When parking is this constrained, we also have other issues, mostly safety issues, because people tend to then park in front of fire hydrants, block vision clearance, And park over crosswalks.

1049
02:14:14.969 --> 02:14:19.765
<v Raylee Stark>If you lived in Eliot and came home during a game, this is what you would experience.

1050
02:14:26.226 --> 02:14:30.850
<v Raylee Stark>How PBOT manages parking is to, to keep the occupancy under 85%.

1051
02:14:31.542 --> 02:14:34.140
<v Raylee Stark>So ideally, there'd be 1 to 3 spaces available.

1052
02:14:35.345 --> 02:14:38.337
<v Raylee Stark>As you can see by the diagram that shows an 80% occupancy.

1053
02:14:39.029 --> 02:14:44.506
<v Raylee Stark>So when a resident comes home from work or running an errand, we want them to be able to find a space on the street.

1054
02:14:45.533 --> 02:14:50.849
<v Raylee Stark>And if they're a business or a nonprofit, we want their, their guests, their customers to be able to find a spot.

1055
02:14:54.439 --> 02:15:07.323
<v Raylee Stark>Our proposal today is to increase the rate from $5.40 to $8 per hour only on the block faces that are experiencing the highest demand.

1056
02:15:07.421 --> 02:15:14.425
<v Raylee Stark>So we will update— the proposal is to update the transportation fee schedule to create a new line item for an $8 rate.

1057
02:15:18.292 --> 02:15:30.064
<v Raylee Stark>For event parking, if eventgoers must drive, we want them to be able to park in the area of the remaining area of the Lloyd Event District and not in the Eliot neighborhood.

1058
02:15:30.880 --> 02:15:36.418
<v Raylee Stark>The rest of the Lloyd Event District is— are different types of uses, and the capacity for parking is there.

1059
02:15:39.609 --> 02:15:44.759
<v Raylee Stark>Here is a zoomed-in version of that so you can see specifically which block faces are being impacted.

1060
02:15:51.506 --> 02:16:01.533
<v Raylee Stark>Right, this is our proposal today, um, and as I said, I've been working with the neighborhood, and I am committed to making this program work Thank you.

1061
02:16:01.679 --> 02:16:05.559
<v Olivia Clark>Is that the end?

1062
02:16:05.784 --> 02:16:06.380
<v Kristen Hall>That's it.

1063
02:16:06.429 --> 02:16:06.798
<v Kristen Hall>We're here.

1064
02:16:06.927 --> 02:16:08.908
<v Kristen Hall>I'm sorry, we're happy to answer questions.

1065
02:16:09.199 --> 02:16:09.713
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Raylee.

1066
02:16:10.099 --> 02:16:14.984
<v Olivia Clark>Um, uh, before we do that, is there— has anybody signed up to testify on this?

1067
02:16:15.176 --> 02:16:16.992
<v Kristen Hall>We do have one invited testimony.

1068
02:16:17.168 --> 02:16:17.715
<v Olivia Clark>One invited.

1069
02:16:17.828 --> 02:16:20.864
<v Olivia Clark>Can we hear from that person before we have our conversation?

1070
02:16:22.262 --> 02:16:22.729
<v Olivia Clark>Welcome.

1071
02:16:23.512 --> 02:16:24.395
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you for joining us.

1072
02:16:25.649 --> 02:16:25.970
<v Jason Franklin>Thank you.

1073
02:16:26.065 --> 02:16:27.525
<v Jason Franklin>Thank you for— thanks for having me.

1074
02:16:27.734 --> 02:16:29.274
<v Jason Franklin>Uh, for the record, I'm Jason Franklin.

1075
02:16:29.418 --> 02:16:37.072
<v Jason Franklin>I live at 1907 Northeast Rodney Avenue, so within the parking district and within the proposed, um, $8 increase area.

1076
02:16:37.152 --> 02:16:43.168
<v Jason Franklin>So, um, first I want to say thanks to Ray Lee and all the staff who've been working with the neighborhood for a long time.

1077
02:16:43.458 --> 02:16:52.987
<v Jason Franklin>Uh, my wife and I have lived at our current, um, residence for 28 years, so we've seen the traffic, uh, gradually increase over the years.

1078
02:16:53.325 --> 02:16:59.620
<v Jason Franklin>Um, Partially to more and more events in the district, which is great, and also more residents, which is also great.

1079
02:17:00.150 --> 02:17:05.646
<v Jason Franklin>But as was pointed out, parking is a scarce resource and needs to be managed adequately.

1080
02:17:06.014 --> 02:17:08.007
<v Jason Franklin>And currently that's just not the case.

1081
02:17:08.264 --> 02:17:20.250
<v Jason Franklin>So as was pointed out, we do pay a yearly rate for our parking privilege of parking in front of, hopefully close to our house, and that's $155 a year.

1082
02:17:21.132 --> 02:17:27.361
<v Jason Franklin>And that is in no way guarantees that we'll have any place to park on a game day or a major event.

1083
02:17:27.554 --> 02:17:29.415
<v Jason Franklin>And so we just, we don't go out, right?

1084
02:17:30.105 --> 02:17:41.727
<v Jason Franklin>You want to make sure that you have groceries and don't have anything come up during a game day because you're not getting a space to park anywhere close to your house if you're in that impacted area that, that really indicated.

1085
02:17:41.841 --> 02:17:47.362
<v Jason Franklin>So hopefully this increase will help alleviate that somewhat.

1086
02:17:47.683 --> 02:17:59.415
<v Jason Franklin>I'm I'm not entirely convinced that $8 is even enough, really, given that it's, you know, $50 to park next to the arena and $25 to park across the street or whatever it is.

1087
02:18:00.056 --> 02:18:06.049
<v Jason Franklin>So I think there will continue to be parking impacts, but this first step is important to take.

1088
02:18:06.146 --> 02:18:16.325
<v Jason Franklin>And I think moving in more of a dynamic pricing, giving staff a little more leeway to continue to manage the district as we move forward, Working with the neighborhood association is going to be important.

1089
02:18:16.406 --> 02:18:25.463
<v Jason Franklin>So, um, again, I want to thank you for your time and encourage you to vote yes on this resolution, move it to, um, or this ordinance, and move it to full council.

1090
02:18:25.769 --> 02:18:25.994
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

1091
02:18:26.748 --> 02:18:27.326
<v Olivia Clark>Well, thank you.

1092
02:18:27.390 --> 02:18:28.531
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you for being here today.

1093
02:18:29.237 --> 02:18:32.176
<v Olivia Clark>Colleagues, I don't see any hands up yet, so I'm going to ask a question.

1094
02:18:32.915 --> 02:18:34.954
<v Olivia Clark>Um, can you— oh, we do.

1095
02:18:35.019 --> 02:18:35.629
<v Olivia Clark>We have testifiers.

1096
02:18:35.742 --> 02:18:36.513
<v Olivia Clark>Oh, we have another person.

1097
02:18:36.945 --> 02:18:39.307
<v Unidentified speaker>We have, we have 2 testifiers today.

1098
02:18:39.435 --> 02:18:40.528
<v Olivia Clark>Yes, I thought it was just one.

1099
02:18:40.639 --> 02:18:41.074
<v Unidentified speaker>Great.

1100
02:18:41.447 --> 02:18:41.786
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

1101
02:18:41.865 --> 02:18:42.173
<v Olivia Clark>Super.

1102
02:18:42.720 --> 02:18:46.123
<v Unidentified speaker>We have Alan Redwick and Edan Krolowitz.

1103
02:18:46.365 --> 02:18:47.220
<v Olivia Clark>Hi, Alan.

1104
02:18:47.317 --> 02:18:48.139
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you for being here.

1105
02:18:49.165 --> 02:18:49.625
<v Alan Redwick>Hello.

1106
02:18:50.084 --> 02:18:52.720
<v Alan Redwick>I have extensive notes, but I'll try to be brief.

1107
02:18:54.301 --> 02:18:54.672
<v Alan Redwick>Good morning.

1108
02:18:54.769 --> 02:18:55.829
<v Alan Redwick>My name is Alan Redwick.

1109
02:18:55.975 --> 02:18:58.918
<v Alan Redwick>I'm currently the co-chair of the Eliot Neighborhood Association.

1110
02:18:58.983 --> 02:19:01.509
<v Alan Redwick>I've been very involved in all of the committee meetings.

1111
02:19:01.969 --> 02:19:05.426
<v Alan Redwick>There have been many, more than 20 over the years, talking about this process.

1112
02:19:07.628 --> 02:19:10.291
<v Alan Redwick>You know, the first attempt for this was in 1992.

1113
02:19:10.852 --> 02:19:15.073
<v Alan Redwick>In 2011, there was a mini area permit program that was created.

1114
02:19:15.665 --> 02:19:20.929
<v Alan Redwick>In 2018, there were 2, like, pilot areas, Boise and Eliot, that were created.

1115
02:19:22.004 --> 02:19:24.218
<v Alan Redwick>The parking task force started in 2022.

1116
02:19:24.971 --> 02:19:26.047
<v Alan Redwick>This is now the second round.

1117
02:19:26.094 --> 02:19:28.341
<v Alan Redwick>We tried permits, enforcement couldn't do it.

1118
02:19:28.757 --> 02:19:38.956
<v Alan Redwick>Now we have meters, the price isn't high enough, and and we also have a larger plan, the North Northeast Plan, which is still waiting for you guys.

1119
02:19:39.004 --> 02:19:50.540
<v Alan Redwick>We're waiting for staff to bring something to you guys that you could let us create a committee today, but you could also wait and instruct staff to come back with a little bit more information for you about that.

1120
02:19:51.939 --> 02:19:55.120
<v Alan Redwick>But as Jason said, you know, people can't park in front of their house.

1121
02:19:55.248 --> 02:19:58.029
<v Alan Redwick>The entire purpose of this district was to let people park in front of their house.

1122
02:19:58.110 --> 02:20:07.930
<v Alan Redwick>So a lot of money, you know, $25,000 a year from residents, plus sounds like $750,000 in meter revenue, is going to not accomplish anything.

1123
02:20:08.250 --> 02:20:14.209
<v Alan Redwick>I mean, revenue is great, but that's not what we tried to do, and we're quite frustrated.

1124
02:20:14.209 --> 02:20:20.629
<v Alan Redwick>This Zone V was supposed to be like one of many things that we talked about during this parking area plan.

1125
02:20:20.629 --> 02:20:34.717
<v Alan Redwick>As you know, like, we have several commercial districts in the area, and parking around those areas has been constrained as more housing has gotten built, and we aren't able to deal with any of those issues until the North Northeast Parking Plan is adopted.

1126
02:20:34.846 --> 02:20:46.442
<v Alan Redwick>I think you guys have some potential language you could amend to the ordinance you have in front of you today if you wanted to pass that in my written testimony online.

1127
02:20:48.180 --> 02:20:50.938
<v Alan Redwick>But there's a couple other problems with the current setup.

1128
02:20:51.068 --> 02:21:03.570
<v Alan Redwick>One is most of the newer parking permit areas share 51% of their revenue with the area that they're set up in, but this one is currently just dumping all of its money somewhere else.

1129
02:21:03.650 --> 02:21:04.797
<v Alan Redwick>We're not getting any benefits.

1130
02:21:05.184 --> 02:21:13.319
<v Alan Redwick>We had tried to subsidize low-income permits, provide guest permits, which I guess disappeared in one of the iterations of this plan.

1131
02:21:14.950 --> 02:21:26.858
<v Alan Redwick>So there were supposed to be some perks to the neighborhoods in the area that have been lost I think having a North Northeast parking district would allow us to continue the conversations and kind of get some of that stuff back.

1132
02:21:28.920 --> 02:21:31.558
<v Alan Redwick>But we're pretty— I personally am frustrated.

1133
02:21:31.622 --> 02:21:33.242
<v Alan Redwick>The people that live in the area are frustrated.

1134
02:21:33.307 --> 02:21:36.367
<v Alan Redwick>I mean, they have additional enforcement, so they're getting parking tickets.

1135
02:21:36.415 --> 02:21:52.700
<v Alan Redwick>I know someone is getting like their paychecks garnished to pay parking tickets based on the new district that was created because, you know, if you park in front of a anywhere that you're not supposed to, now you're gonna get— there's a lot of enforcement going around, so now you're gonna get ticketed.

1136
02:21:53.510 --> 02:22:00.049
<v Alan Redwick>But there's, you know, the whole point of this was you should be able to park on your block or close to your house during the event.

1137
02:22:00.200 --> 02:22:09.149
<v Alan Redwick>So I'm nervous that $8 is not gonna be enough, that this is not gonna come back to you for another 2 years and it'll be a totally different group of faces.

1138
02:22:09.149 --> 02:22:16.092
<v Alan Redwick>And, you know, we're gonna be stuck dealing with the realities of this semi-failing parking district for a while.

1139
02:22:16.204 --> 02:22:24.185
<v Alan Redwick>So if you want, I can read the suggested amendment language, but I don't know if that's worth your time.

1140
02:22:24.266 --> 02:22:27.235
<v Alan Redwick>It's written down in the written testimony.

1141
02:22:28.106 --> 02:22:41.667
<v Alan Redwick>I can give you more information about all the many, many meetings and phone calls I've had about this, but also, you know, I don't want to I'd love to have more of a discussion if that's—.

1142
02:22:41.667 --> 02:22:44.343
<v Olivia Clark>Colleagues, um, do we have an opinion on the amendment?

1143
02:22:46.174 --> 02:22:48.497
<v Mitch Green>I, I would like for the testifier to read it.

1144
02:22:48.820 --> 02:22:49.998
<v Olivia Clark>Okay, okay, go ahead.

1145
02:22:50.611 --> 02:23:02.006
<v Alan Redwick>Okay, so there's 3 pieces, um, that the Deputy City Administrator in Public Works is authorized to implement the North Northeast Parking District as outlined in the Parking Management Action Plan.

1146
02:23:02.602 --> 02:23:03.745
<v Alan Redwick>This is a long document.

1147
02:23:04.228 --> 02:23:07.370
<v Alan Redwick>It was created over 2 years second.

1148
02:23:08.235 --> 02:23:09.325
<v Alan Redwick>Second.

1149
02:23:10.302 --> 02:23:20.990
<v Alan Redwick>The Portland Bureau of Transportation director is authorized to appoint a North Northeast Park and District Stakeholder Advisory Committee to inform future actions.

1150
02:23:21.680 --> 02:23:28.441
<v Alan Redwick>Part 3, the Portland Bureau of Transportation will return to council to establish any new meter or permit programs.

1151
02:23:28.825 --> 02:23:32.094
<v Alan Redwick>Without council action, meter or permit programs cannot be implemented.

1152
02:23:32.711 --> 02:23:36.066
<v Alan Redwick>You know, I would love to not see that last one, but I know you guys will probably want control.

1153
02:23:36.453 --> 02:23:40.034
<v Alan Redwick>So basically, this isn't really allowing us to do anything except keep talking.

1154
02:23:40.956 --> 02:23:46.522
<v Alan Redwick>Um, otherwise, we're gonna have to come back and ask for permission again to continue that work.

1155
02:23:47.167 --> 02:23:53.287
<v Alan Redwick>Um, so I'd love to not have to spend y'all's time—.

1156
02:23:53.496 --> 02:23:54.111
<v Olivia Clark>No, thank you.

1157
02:23:54.386 --> 02:23:55.565
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you very much for that.

1158
02:23:55.743 --> 02:24:06.147
<v Olivia Clark>I'm, um, not as familiar with the process that PBOT uses on parking districts, so I'm not sure how— what their reaction is to this.

1159
02:24:07.765 --> 02:24:10.067
<v Olivia Clark>And it's not my district.

1160
02:24:10.131 --> 02:24:15.157
<v Olivia Clark>I'm curious to know what Councilor Kanal might think about this.

1161
02:24:17.162 --> 02:24:17.308
<v Olivia Clark>Okay.

1162
02:24:17.631 --> 02:24:17.762
<v Olivia Clark>All right.

1163
02:24:17.809 --> 02:24:23.120
<v Olivia Clark>Let's see if there's— are there other witnesses, other folks here to testify?

1164
02:24:23.203 --> 02:24:24.387
<v Unidentified speaker>That concludes testimony.

1165
02:24:24.452 --> 02:24:27.075
<v Unidentified speaker>Are there Testifier chose not to today.

1166
02:24:27.156 --> 02:24:27.431
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

1167
02:24:27.801 --> 02:24:28.754
<v Olivia Clark>Okay, thank you.

1168
02:24:29.255 --> 02:24:29.691
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

1169
02:24:30.225 --> 02:24:34.165
<v Olivia Clark>Yes, well, we have, um, a bunch of hands up starting with Councilor Smith.

1170
02:24:34.778 --> 02:24:39.295
<v Olivia Clark>Okay, thank you.

1171
02:24:39.827 --> 02:24:41.134
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you for reading that.

1172
02:24:41.280 --> 02:24:51.921
<v Loretta Smith>Uh, how will PBOT measure whether the proposed $8 parking rates improves parking availability without creating unnecessary financial burden Really?

1173
02:24:52.176 --> 02:24:53.763
<v Kristen Hall>You want to talk about that?

1174
02:24:53.876 --> 02:24:54.004
<v Loretta Smith>Yes.

1175
02:24:55.415 --> 02:25:03.846
<v Raylee Stark>So the reason why we proposed $8 is because we have a parking management manual that helps us dictate how much parking should be.

1176
02:25:04.601 --> 02:25:10.916
<v Raylee Stark>And it also, based on that, we were— we doing $8 an hour, we're hoping to see a decrease in occupancy.

1177
02:25:11.815 --> 02:25:19.262
<v Raylee Stark>Now, we are actively working with the property managers in the neighborhood to make sure that residents are purchasing permits.

1178
02:25:20.083 --> 02:25:35.926
<v Raylee Stark>And we know that if there, if there, the, there is a low-income discount, so we are, are promoting that and just making sure that they have permits because it is much more inexpensive than paying for parking on a daily basis.

1179
02:25:41.013 --> 02:25:42.125
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Kanal.

1180
02:25:43.832 --> 02:25:45.420
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Chair Clark.

1181
02:25:45.659 --> 02:25:48.948
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, so first, uh, thanks for bringing this forward.

1182
02:25:49.043 --> 02:25:49.203
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm—.

1183
02:25:49.203 --> 02:25:50.486
<v Sameer Kanal>It's my district, obviously.

1184
02:25:50.534 --> 02:25:53.646
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm happy to see the, the, the work that PBOT's done in this.

1185
02:25:54.238 --> 02:26:01.551
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, while I'm very, um, excited about the idea, you know, obviously Moda Center, Veterans Memorial Coliseum bring necessary business to the district.

1186
02:26:01.695 --> 02:26:09.825
<v Sameer Kanal>Obviously we see, um, the effects of that when you're at Cartside or Tamale Boy or, or anywhere else, um, on Williams, for example.

1187
02:26:09.889 --> 02:26:13.540
<v Sameer Kanal>Uh, it's, it's There's a lot of impact as well on adjacent neighbors.

1188
02:26:15.200 --> 02:26:21.514
<v Sameer Kanal>We've seen a lot of testimony and emails come in around event parking spilling into the neighborhood.

1189
02:26:22.719 --> 02:26:25.403
<v Sameer Kanal>You've obviously backed that up with the data today.

1190
02:26:25.547 --> 02:26:42.668
<v Sameer Kanal>And I think the idea is that we should be taking a step to make it a little less attractive for eventgoers to park on residential streets and therefore create more spaces while protecting as we implement that, residents and permit holders from any of the potential negative effects.

1191
02:26:43.359 --> 02:26:46.153
<v Sameer Kanal>I did have a question around a few different things.

1192
02:26:46.265 --> 02:26:58.806
<v Sameer Kanal>So heard about from neighborhood businesses like Lazydays Brewing, for example, about some of the unintended impacts of this approach around customer access and confusion about when event pricing is in effect.

1193
02:26:58.853 --> 02:26:59.094
<v Sameer Kanal>Mm-hmm.

1194
02:26:59.352 --> 02:27:07.843
<v Sameer Kanal>And so I wanted to just kind of understand that as someone who's been to Lazydays a few times, trying to, you know, make sure that they're able to succeed.

1195
02:27:07.940 --> 02:27:14.728
<v Sameer Kanal>But how is— yeah, it seems like you know where this question is going, so I'll just let you do it.

1196
02:27:15.082 --> 02:27:18.468
<v Kristen Hall>Yeah, we have heard from Lazydays Brewing as well.

1197
02:27:19.559 --> 02:27:24.038
<v Kristen Hall>That area is not proposed for a change in the pricing meter parking.

1198
02:27:25.418 --> 02:27:29.302
<v Kristen Hall>The top part, we're not proposing to change the meter rate.

1199
02:27:29.351 --> 02:27:32.255
<v Kristen Hall>So it's a little bit separate from the ordinance we brought today.

1200
02:27:32.897 --> 02:27:41.504
<v Kristen Hall>But we also, We are really glad that through this process we have opened up the avenues for more engagement with those stakeholders in that area.

1201
02:27:41.567 --> 02:27:53.240
<v Kristen Hall>It's— there's some office buildings, there's some new multifamily housing, there's Harriet Tubman School, Lazydays Brewing, and we want to continue to work with them to figure out what the solution to the problem is there.

1202
02:27:53.594 --> 02:28:02.614
<v Kristen Hall>Is it the way the signage is displayed, which I rode my bike by this morning and looked at and It's a little confusing, so I think we can work on it.

1203
02:28:02.679 --> 02:28:03.850
<v Kristen Hall>So can we work on the signage?

1204
02:28:03.977 --> 02:28:08.661
<v Kristen Hall>Can we understand better what the issues are from all the stakeholders and figure out what the solution is?

1205
02:28:08.772 --> 02:28:12.798
<v Kristen Hall>So we are committed to continuing that conversation and figuring it out.

1206
02:28:12.846 --> 02:28:24.474
<v Kristen Hall>I don't have an easy solution to offer you today, but we are going to stay in the conversation, and that is not impacted by the ordinance that is before you today.

1207
02:28:25.034 --> 02:28:25.179
<v Kristen Hall>Right.

1208
02:28:25.675 --> 02:28:33.358
<v Sameer Kanal>And I think you're raising, it's a good pivot into my next question, 'cause signage is another thing that's come up and broadly enforcement.

1209
02:28:33.469 --> 02:28:34.560
<v Sameer Kanal>We get a lot of emails.

1210
02:28:35.539 --> 02:28:51.334
<v Sameer Kanal>I know that Councilor Perlegany has also mentioned it to me that there have been concerns about enforcement, concerns about lack thereof, meaning there are people who are alleged to be parking longer than the stated time limits as well as not paying at all.

1211
02:28:52.781 --> 02:29:00.796
<v Sameer Kanal>And obviously it can feel like I, you know, if you're a resident there, I have to pay for a $110 a year permit and other people are kind of getting away with not doing so.

1212
02:29:00.843 --> 02:29:05.486
<v Sameer Kanal>So I wanted to, I wanted to just kind of ask about that.

1213
02:29:05.566 --> 02:29:11.622
<v Sameer Kanal>There's one side of it, which is ensuring that everybody knows what the standard is, and signage is a part of that.

1214
02:29:11.671 --> 02:29:13.422
<v Sameer Kanal>But the other piece is sort of PBOT's enforcement.

1215
02:29:14.000 --> 02:29:15.445
<v Sameer Kanal>Can you speak to how that's going to work?

1216
02:29:15.510 --> 02:29:22.319
<v Kristen Hall>Yeah, I really appreciate the framing of the two-sided equation of both making our expectations Communication's clear and then making sure everyone follows the same set of rules.

1217
02:29:22.914 --> 02:29:25.884
<v Kristen Hall>We've had a lot of conversations about how to improve enforcement in this area.

1218
02:29:25.948 --> 02:29:27.457
<v Kristen Hall>Do you want to talk about the strategies?

1219
02:29:27.889 --> 02:29:28.130
<v Olivia Clark>Sure.

1220
02:29:29.158 --> 02:29:39.817
<v Raylee Stark>Yeah, we know that pricing alone is not the only tool that's going to fix this issue, so we are working with parking enforcement on a couple other strategies.

1221
02:29:40.332 --> 02:29:50.039
<v Raylee Stark>We plan to have, especially during the, the beginning of the season, really have focused enforcement in that area.

1222
02:29:50.695 --> 02:29:52.251
<v Raylee Stark>So that is one plan.

1223
02:29:52.603 --> 02:30:37.836
<v Raylee Stark>We also are still engaging with the residents on ensuring them that they get permits and then putting out some temporary signs, letting people know the rules and knowing also what the potential citations could be so that it encourages them to pay to and then along— and one other thing along with this proposal is that it actually will allow for us to highlight this neighborhood and send it to, you know, work with Rip City Communications so that they can now put a map on, you know, on their website that says, do you know, we do not encourage you to park here, we encourage you to park in the rest of the event district.

1224
02:30:37.996 --> 02:30:39.073
<v Raylee Stark>And we did not have that prior.

1225
02:30:39.120 --> 02:30:39.248
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

1226
02:30:42.041 --> 02:30:43.490
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, I appreciate that.

1227
02:30:43.877 --> 02:30:59.146
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, so, you know, in the financial and budgetary impacts, it says that the anticipation is that this is going to be revenue neutral because even though we're increasing the number— or sorry, we're decreasing the number of people who pay even as we're increasing the amount each person pays.

1228
02:31:00.000 --> 02:31:01.963
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, I had 2 questions related to that.

1229
02:31:02.045 --> 02:31:04.674
<v Sameer Kanal>One is, can we earmark any additional revenue to pay for this?

1230
02:31:04.722 --> 02:31:04.788
<v Sameer Kanal>Yes.

1231
02:31:05.873 --> 02:31:10.117
<v Sameer Kanal>Revenue that does come in if those projections are off for signage and enforcement?

1232
02:31:12.564 --> 02:31:14.641
<v Sameer Kanal>Is that something doable on your end?

1233
02:31:14.818 --> 02:31:18.844
<v Kristen Hall>We can certainly talk about how any additional revenues get spent.

1234
02:31:19.505 --> 02:31:25.809
<v Kristen Hall>I would want to consult with our interim director who's sitting in the back about how we might do that.

1235
02:31:26.326 --> 02:31:26.440
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Okay.

1236
02:31:27.132 --> 02:31:37.595
<v Sameer Kanal>And then similarly, has there been analysis done on if there's an expected increase to revenues in the parking garages.

1237
02:31:39.433 --> 02:31:49.987
<v Sameer Kanal>Because if the idea is to displace event parking from the streets, some of that may end up being transit, of course, but some of it may also end up being parking in the Rip City garages.

1238
02:31:50.920 --> 02:31:51.647
<v Olivia Clark>I think the—.

1239
02:31:51.761 --> 02:32:06.789
<v Kristen Hall>I think, you know, with the city's on-street parking management in this small area going up to $8 an hour, we're hoping that it helps people find parking in other areas, whether that's off-street in a lot or in the rest of the event district where the parking rates aren't changing.

1240
02:32:07.286 --> 02:32:15.756
<v Kristen Hall>So most of the Lloyd District event district will remain at that $5.40 an hour, and there is capacity for more people to park in the rest of that Lloyd event district.

1241
02:32:15.820 --> 02:32:37.876
<v Kristen Hall>So we're hoping instead of parking in the, in the residential neighborhood that has a negative impact on the people who live there, people instead park in the rest of the Lloyd District where the land use context is, is more that opens up a question of if that makes those areas above 85%, should we expect that you're checking that frequently and coming back to us at that point?

1242
02:32:37.940 --> 02:32:46.013
<v Sameer Kanal>Because I'd prefer that over, you know, neighborhood associations raising it and not feeling like that's reflected, right?

1243
02:32:47.192 --> 02:32:48.743
<v Raylee Stark>Yeah, we will continue to monitor.

1244
02:32:49.308 --> 02:32:51.279
<v Raylee Stark>So we will be doing another parking study.

1245
02:32:51.860 --> 02:32:53.475
<v Raylee Stark>We do one once to twice a year.

1246
02:32:53.957 --> 02:33:00.617
<v Raylee Stark>Year to check to make sure that the occupancy is at that level that we want to see it at.

1247
02:33:00.762 --> 02:33:05.202
<v Raylee Stark>So we do the entire Lloyd Event District once to twice a year.

1248
02:33:06.135 --> 02:33:06.360
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay.

1249
02:33:08.690 --> 02:33:16.845
<v Sameer Kanal>The last thing that I wanted to raise is, you know, when we're on the topic of earmarks, and I don't think there's enough revenue to make this all work, but I am concerned about affordability.

1250
02:33:16.925 --> 02:33:24.878
<v Sameer Kanal>I appreciate that there is a That there is an option for low-income residents to get a $65 permit annually instead of a $110.

1251
02:33:25.458 --> 02:33:28.050
<v Sameer Kanal>But obviously, if you live elsewhere, it's free to park on the street.

1252
02:33:28.603 --> 02:33:35.816
<v Sameer Kanal>So I just wanted to understand in terms of one, making sure that there's awareness of the eligibility for the discount program.

1253
02:33:35.961 --> 02:33:36.717
<v Sameer Kanal>Mm-hmm.

1254
02:33:37.391 --> 02:33:40.354
<v Sameer Kanal>I know there's a lot of folks who don't know that they could get that.

1255
02:33:42.270 --> 02:33:46.992
<v Sameer Kanal>And then the other piece is there's Streamlining of the online application.

1256
02:33:47.040 --> 02:33:52.306
<v Sameer Kanal>We've gotten feedback on that being a fairly arduous process to my office.

1257
02:33:52.370 --> 02:33:55.470
<v Sameer Kanal>So also, just one other thing.

1258
02:33:56.326 --> 02:34:00.332
<v Sameer Kanal>Is this in fact going to be the highest rate for event parking anywhere in the city?

1259
02:34:00.995 --> 02:34:03.110
<v Sameer Kanal>Because that's— I've gotten that in email, but I don't know if that's true.

1260
02:34:04.765 --> 02:34:14.431
<v Raylee Stark>Right now, in the Northwest Parking District around Providence Park, I think the rate right now is $7 an hour.

1261
02:34:15.738 --> 02:34:16.870
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, so this would pass that.

1262
02:34:16.950 --> 02:34:25.672
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, so then, you know, I would request that, you know, when we're talking about farmers markets and neighborhood association meetings and all that, just being visible to kind of let people know what's changing.

1263
02:34:25.948 --> 02:34:32.188
<v Sameer Kanal>I think the first time they should learn about it would ideally not be the ticket that they get, right?

1264
02:34:32.333 --> 02:34:34.457
<v Sameer Kanal>Which it happens everywhere.

1265
02:34:34.504 --> 02:34:39.907
<v Sameer Kanal>It's not specific to this part of the city or even the city, but I just wanted to excellent point.

1266
02:34:40.293 --> 02:34:44.721
<v Sameer Kanal>I will move to refer it with a do pass recommendation.

1267
02:34:44.947 --> 02:34:45.668
<v Olivia Clark>Oh, the amendment?

1268
02:34:45.764 --> 02:34:46.423
<v Sameer Kanal>No, the ordinance.

1269
02:34:46.566 --> 02:34:47.065
<v Olivia Clark>Oh, the ordinance.

1270
02:34:47.129 --> 02:34:47.707
<v Olivia Clark>Oh, thank you.

1271
02:34:48.557 --> 02:34:49.230
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you very much.

1272
02:34:49.921 --> 02:34:52.872
<v Olivia Clark>And actually Providence Park is $7.40.

1273
02:34:53.708 --> 02:34:53.884
<v Olivia Clark>Okay.

1274
02:34:54.045 --> 02:34:56.179
<v Olivia Clark>So maybe this is inflation.

1275
02:34:56.259 --> 02:34:57.365
<v Sameer Kanal>I always take the max, so I'm—.

1276
02:34:57.478 --> 02:34:59.355
<v Olivia Clark>Right, right.

1277
02:34:59.725 --> 02:35:00.061
<v Olivia Clark>Great.

1278
02:35:00.703 --> 02:35:05.020
<v Olivia Clark>So I have a— the motion's been moved by Councilor Kanal.

1279
02:35:05.084 --> 02:35:05.421
<v Loretta Smith>Is there a second?

1280
02:35:05.743 --> 02:35:06.240
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

1281
02:35:10.070 --> 02:35:13.679
<v Olivia Clark>It's been seconded by Councilor Smith.

1282
02:35:15.068 --> 02:35:25.674
<v Olivia Clark>I— sorry, we can have some more discussion, but I was going to ask PBOT for their opinion about the amendment that our witness has offered up.

1283
02:35:26.762 --> 02:35:40.406
<v Kristen Hall>So the amendment that the witness offered is very similar to what we hope to bring to you as a north— when we ask you to consider the north-northeast parking Plan in its complete form.

1284
02:35:42.479 --> 02:35:52.555
<v Kristen Hall>Whether or not you want to consider that today without the presentation and full discussion of the North and Northeast Parking Plan is really up to you as the council committee.

1285
02:35:52.603 --> 02:35:54.310
<v Olivia Clark>Kristen, when do you intend to bring that?

1286
02:35:54.712 --> 02:35:56.129
<v Kristen Hall>It's ready to bring to you.

1287
02:35:56.243 --> 02:36:10.238
<v Kristen Hall>It's been a minute since we finished it, and so Rayleigh has actually been doing a bit more stakeholder engagement to make make sure stakeholders who have moved into the area since we completed our outreach are aware of the plan and how it will impact them.

1288
02:36:10.302 --> 02:36:23.591
<v Kristen Hall>So we would, um, I think in our perfect world, we would finish that outreach over the next, uh, 6 to 8 weeks and come back to you, I think, probably in January, given what— how we understand your, um, current agendas.

1289
02:36:24.023 --> 02:36:25.950
<v Kristen Hall>But we could be ready to come back sooner if you'd like.

1290
02:36:26.897 --> 02:36:29.784
<v Olivia Clark>Well, I'm open, uh, should someone like to move that amendment.

1291
02:36:33.864 --> 02:36:41.108
<v Alan Redwick>I just wanted to say that a bunch of the concerns that Commissioner Kanal is bringing up, we right now have like an ad hoc email list where we talk about these things.

1292
02:36:41.302 --> 02:36:46.558
<v Alan Redwick>We— creating a committee would be actually quite helpful to address all of those concerns in a more structured way.

1293
02:36:46.655 --> 02:36:48.337
<v Alan Redwick>So if that's—.

1294
02:36:48.402 --> 02:36:49.566
<v Olivia Clark>Let's stay on point here.

1295
02:36:49.727 --> 02:36:53.976
<v Olivia Clark>So, um, I don't see anybody offering— what?

1296
02:36:54.584 --> 02:36:55.967
<v Olivia Clark>Oh, I'm sorry, in the queue.

1297
02:36:56.503 --> 02:36:57.242
<v Olivia Clark>I forgot the queue.

1298
02:36:57.691 --> 02:37:00.406
<v Olivia Clark>How about Councilor Green gets an opportunity?

1299
02:37:00.905 --> 02:37:02.302
<v Mitch Green>Thank you, Chair Clark.

1300
02:37:02.431 --> 02:37:11.700
<v Mitch Green>Um, I was going to ask, uh, Councilor Kanal, who is the only member of the committee who lives in the district, what your appetite is for the specific language.

1301
02:37:11.828 --> 02:37:13.097
<v Mitch Green>You think it's appropriate at this time?

1302
02:37:14.399 --> 02:37:19.443
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah, I, I— it's not about the time, it's about the legislative vehicle.

1303
02:37:19.700 --> 02:37:20.938
<v Sameer Kanal>I just want to be clear about that.

1304
02:37:20.986 --> 02:37:26.656
<v Sameer Kanal>I think that there are a lot of things in the plan So, you know, looking at, there's 3 things that were floated in here.

1305
02:37:27.971 --> 02:37:38.762
<v Sameer Kanal>You know, one is on authorization to implement the plan, which I think is the broader conversation that our staff was just talking about in terms of doing that.

1306
02:37:40.255 --> 02:37:42.808
<v Sameer Kanal>The second thing is appointing a stakeholder committee.

1307
02:37:43.065 --> 02:37:52.315
<v Sameer Kanal>The third thing I think is fair to talk about the idea that whether or not council needs to approve any further meter or permit programs.

1308
02:37:52.493 --> 02:37:58.031
<v Sameer Kanal>I think that's already effectively in place in terms of— we have to change the rates, right?

1309
02:37:58.102 --> 02:38:01.765
<v Sameer Kanal>So if there is a new program, no problem with that piece.

1310
02:38:01.879 --> 02:38:10.664
<v Sameer Kanal>But in terms of committee, obviously I've expressed, not based on being in District 2, but just my experience with committees of wanting to make sure we do that right.

1311
02:38:12.299 --> 02:38:18.290
<v Sameer Kanal>And then the second piece is I would like to hear the I think there's, there's a lot more in there.

1312
02:38:18.561 --> 02:38:19.797
<v Sameer Kanal>It is a very long document.

1313
02:38:19.844 --> 02:38:20.212
<v Olivia Clark>That's fair.

1314
02:38:20.902 --> 02:38:21.912
<v Olivia Clark>So we will reschedule.

1315
02:38:22.007 --> 02:38:26.031
<v Olivia Clark>I don't know, uh, Acting Director just stepped up and I think wants to maybe make a comment.

1316
02:38:27.153 --> 02:38:38.451
<v Tate White>Yes, I'm Interim Director Wendy Cully for PBOT, and I just wanted to share that we would be glad to bring this back to you after Rayleigh finishes her outreach.

1317
02:38:38.996 --> 02:38:39.461
<v Jacob Sherman>There's some—.

1318
02:38:39.990 --> 02:38:44.561
<v Tate White>It's been a complicated plan and we've put a lot of effort into it and just want to make sure that It's complete.

1319
02:38:44.933 --> 02:38:46.399
<v Tate White>So I would appreciate the extra time.

1320
02:38:47.029 --> 02:38:47.334
<v Unidentified speaker>Great.

1321
02:38:47.529 --> 02:38:48.432
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Councilor Kanal.

1322
02:38:48.495 --> 02:38:49.431
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Green, do you have any—.

1323
02:38:49.462 --> 02:38:51.414
<v Mitch Green>Yeah, yeah, still have some discussion here.

1324
02:38:53.092 --> 02:39:09.331
<v Mitch Green>So, um, I heard, um, I, I think what I'm worried about is, and I don't think this is the intent of the Bureau, but, um, you know, 8 weeks becomes maybe 10 weeks, and then it— I feel like there's been a lot of engagement on this probably hitherto.

1325
02:39:09.865 --> 02:39:10.202
<v Mitch Green>To date.

1326
02:39:10.427 --> 02:39:20.222
<v Mitch Green>And, um, I wonder if there's just some appetite to put some declarative language that, like, there's a time certain this comes back, maybe before the end of the calendar year or something like that.

1327
02:39:20.543 --> 02:39:25.649
<v Mitch Green>Um, I don't know if we can do that on the fly, if that's something that can happen after this committee, before council.

1328
02:39:26.726 --> 02:39:28.733
<v Olivia Clark>Um, I don't think we have time on our agenda.

1329
02:39:28.972 --> 02:39:31.220
<v Mitch Green>Okay, well, I'll tell you what I'm going to do.

1330
02:39:31.381 --> 02:39:35.138
<v Mitch Green>I am going to think about what to do before this goes to the full body.

1331
02:39:35.679 --> 02:39:41.574
<v Mitch Green>To put some sort of assuring language in that we are not in the business of— like, we want to move fast, we really do.

1332
02:39:42.058 --> 02:39:44.927
<v Mitch Green>And, um, but I'm going to respect that it's your district, Councilor Kanal.

1333
02:39:45.554 --> 02:39:55.259
<v Mitch Green>So maybe I'll talk to you about that offline before we— but so I'll support this getting out of committee, but then I think I want to make sure that we can maybe add something before the full council.

1334
02:39:55.522 --> 02:39:56.950
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, I appreciate that.

1335
02:39:58.520 --> 02:40:04.123
<v Olivia Clark>All right, colleagues, we have a motion on the floor it's been moved by Councilor Kanal, seconded by Councilor Smith.

1336
02:40:04.219 --> 02:40:05.870
<v Olivia Clark>If there's not any more discussion—.

1337
02:40:05.870 --> 02:40:06.769
<v Sameer Kanal>30 Seconds.

1338
02:40:07.184 --> 02:40:09.253
<v Olivia Clark>Okay, we're running behind, just a warning.

1339
02:40:09.444 --> 02:40:17.875
<v Sameer Kanal>So yeah, first, just one, I want to follow up on lazy days and the signage and all that stuff, and I'd love a briefing with you on that.

1340
02:40:17.939 --> 02:40:26.754
<v Sameer Kanal>Secondly, just want to make sure that we're— I agree with the idea of ensuring that there's a timeline pursuant to whatever limitations we have on the schedule.

1341
02:40:27.138 --> 02:40:28.709
<v Sameer Kanal>I do want to have the big conversation.

1342
02:40:28.837 --> 02:40:31.016
<v Sameer Kanal>I think there are probably a lot of stakeholders who want to be involved.

1343
02:40:31.179 --> 02:40:32.808
<v Sameer Kanal>In the conversation when we get to that plan.

1344
02:40:33.244 --> 02:40:36.552
<v Sameer Kanal>And I think before the end of the year is, is, is a— would be a goal for me.

1345
02:40:37.198 --> 02:40:43.072
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, if it needs till January, I, you know, I understand, but it is also complicated with our schedule situation changing.

1346
02:40:43.346 --> 02:40:43.588
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks.

1347
02:40:45.605 --> 02:40:45.847
<v Raylee Stark>Thank you.

1348
02:40:45.912 --> 02:40:48.311
<v Olivia Clark>And we, we'll take a look at the schedule, Councilor Green.

1349
02:40:48.504 --> 02:40:50.031
<v Olivia Clark>We'll take it— we'll take another look.

1350
02:40:50.738 --> 02:40:51.477
<v Olivia Clark>Um, great.

1351
02:40:51.702 --> 02:40:54.340
<v Olivia Clark>Um, there's no further discussion.

1352
02:40:54.998 --> 02:40:56.429
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, Diana, would you please call the roll?

1353
02:40:58.450 --> 02:40:58.852
<v Loretta Smith>Green?

1354
02:40:59.995 --> 02:41:00.042
<v Mitch Green>Aye.

1355
02:41:00.832 --> 02:41:01.105
<v Olivia Clark>Smith?

1356
02:41:03.134 --> 02:41:03.182
<v Loretta Smith>Aye.

1357
02:41:04.036 --> 02:41:04.245
<v Unidentified speaker>Kanal?

1358
02:41:04.663 --> 02:41:04.760
<v Sameer Kanal>Aye.

1359
02:41:05.404 --> 02:41:05.934
<v Unidentified speaker>Koyama Lane?

1360
02:41:06.192 --> 02:41:06.370
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Aye.

1361
02:41:06.659 --> 02:41:07.158
<v Unidentified speaker>Clark?

1362
02:41:07.399 --> 02:41:07.448
<v Olivia Clark>Aye.

1363
02:41:08.286 --> 02:41:16.940
<v Unidentified speaker>Uh, with 5 ayes, the motion to refer the ordinance document number 2026-364 to the City Council with a recommendation it be passed has passed.

1364
02:41:17.818 --> 02:41:18.811
<v Olivia Clark>Great, thank you all.

1365
02:41:18.877 --> 02:41:20.163
<v Olivia Clark>Thanks for all your good work, Raylee.

1366
02:41:20.325 --> 02:41:21.058
<v Olivia Clark>I appreciate it.

1367
02:41:21.400 --> 02:41:25.768
<v Olivia Clark>And, um, I'm sure we'll see you again, potentially soon.

1368
02:41:27.338 --> 02:41:29.766
<v Olivia Clark>Um, Diana, would you please call or read the next item?

1369
02:41:31.549 --> 02:41:46.925
<v Unidentified speaker>Item number 4, document number 2026-365, authorize the acceptance of real property from the Oregon Department of Transportation and approve a memorandum of understanding for future property transactions.

1370
02:41:49.343 --> 02:41:54.762
<v Olivia Clark>This ordinance accepts the transfer from an ODOT-owned parcel of land to the city.

1371
02:41:55.290 --> 02:42:01.140
<v Olivia Clark>It's located adjacent to the intersection of Southwest Naito Parkway and South Sherman Street.

1372
02:42:01.766 --> 02:42:06.222
<v Olivia Clark>It also approves an MOU between the city and ODOT for future property transactions.

1373
02:42:06.271 --> 02:42:10.069
<v Olivia Clark>So with that, um, David, you want to take over?

1374
02:42:11.384 --> 02:42:11.816
<v David McEldowney>Thank you.

1375
02:42:12.185 --> 02:42:16.843
<v David McEldowney>Um, good morning, Councilor— or Chair Clark, good evening, Council Clerk and councilors.

1376
02:42:16.924 --> 02:42:18.231
<v David McEldowney>My name is David McEldowney.

1377
02:42:18.844 --> 02:42:28.480
<v David McEldowney>I am PBOT's— excuse me— Real Property Services Division Manager, and I'm joined by Kevin Ballock, who's a supervisor in the property management section.

1378
02:42:29.497 --> 02:42:32.420
<v David McEldowney>Um, do you want to get the presentation up on the screen?

1379
02:42:38.174 --> 02:42:40.056
<v Olivia Clark>It's not letting me share here.

1380
02:42:42.900 --> 02:42:46.253
<v David McEldowney>So when the presentation gets up there, we'll have a map.

1381
02:42:46.350 --> 02:42:50.201
<v David McEldowney>I just wanted to give you a little additional orientation here.

1382
02:43:01.713 --> 02:43:02.119
<v David McEldowney>Do we have it?

1383
02:43:02.216 --> 02:43:04.354
<v Olivia Clark>I think we all have it handy.

1384
02:43:04.630 --> 02:43:05.360
<v David McEldowney>Okay, great.

1385
02:43:06.921 --> 02:43:14.531
<v David McEldowney>So while you continue to work on that, as Councilor Clark mentioned— yes, here we go.

1386
02:43:15.889 --> 02:43:18.733
<v David McEldowney>The property is bounded by Southwest Naito.

1387
02:43:21.164 --> 02:43:27.022
<v David McEldowney>The picture, the left hand is north and right hand is south.

1388
02:43:27.539 --> 02:43:28.683
<v David McEldowney>Top of the picture is east.

1389
02:43:30.702 --> 02:43:32.572
<v David McEldowney>I-405 is just off to the east.

1390
02:43:36.170 --> 02:43:37.010
<v Mitch Green>Yes.

1391
02:43:37.236 --> 02:43:47.790
<v David McEldowney>The ordinance that PBOT is bringing today involves the MOU with ODOT that contemplates the transfer of land to the city as well as future property transfers.

1392
02:43:48.691 --> 02:44:02.774
<v David McEldowney>I believe the committee is familiar with some of these parcels from a previous trade that we had with ODOT that resulted in the expansion of the Saferest Village, which you can see there at the bottom of the screen on the south side of Naito Parkway.

1393
02:44:02.952 --> 02:44:05.884
<v David McEldowney>I'll cover some history really quickly here.

1394
02:44:07.389 --> 02:44:08.639
<v David McEldowney>Kevin, I think I have the slides out of order.

1395
02:44:08.689 --> 02:44:10.557
<v David McEldowney>If you'll go to slide 3, please.

1396
02:44:12.549 --> 02:44:12.841
<v David McEldowney>One more.

1397
02:44:13.309 --> 02:44:13.730
<v Kristen Hall>That's on there.

1398
02:44:14.927 --> 02:44:15.364
<v David McEldowney>One more.

1399
02:44:19.750 --> 02:44:20.135
<v David McEldowney>One more.

1400
02:44:24.041 --> 02:44:24.426
<v David McEldowney>There we go.

1401
02:44:24.507 --> 02:44:24.909
<v David McEldowney>Thank you.

1402
02:44:25.632 --> 02:44:25.873
<v David McEldowney>Okay.

1403
02:44:26.211 --> 02:44:32.875
<v David McEldowney>The parcels we're discussing today were formally improved with the Harbor Freeway, yes.

1404
02:44:32.940 --> 02:44:37.150
<v David McEldowney>The majority of the former freeway land was jointly owned by ODOT and the city.

1405
02:44:39.049 --> 02:44:47.096
<v David McEldowney>So in order to assemble the land needed for the Safe Rest Village, the 2 agencies traded property rights in 2021 and 2025.

1406
02:44:47.871 --> 02:44:58.938
<v David McEldowney>Presently, ODOT and PBOT have reached a tentative agreement in which the state will transfer to the city 2 parcels of land adjacent to the International Kevin, if you go back to slide 2.

1407
02:44:59.959 --> 02:45:01.141
<v David McEldowney>These are the 2 parcels.

1408
02:45:01.254 --> 02:45:05.641
<v David McEldowney>They sit in between the International School property and Naito Parkway.

1409
02:45:07.239 --> 02:45:16.957
<v David McEldowney>The slide shows the 2 parcels of land that would be immediately transferred to the city if the ordinance is passed.

1410
02:45:17.811 --> 02:45:27.597
<v David McEldowney>And if they look familiar, that's because we had traded our 60% undivided interest to the state in the last trade to secure the rest of the land for the Safe Rest Village.

1411
02:45:29.721 --> 02:45:42.148
<v David McEldowney>PBOT is anticipating that if the ordinance is approved, the city will resume our prior relationship with the International School as it relates to stewardship of this land while long-term options are evaluated.

1412
02:45:42.637 --> 02:45:43.403
<v David McEldowney>Slide 4, please.

1413
02:45:46.289 --> 02:45:46.586
<v David McEldowney>Okay.

1414
02:45:48.802 --> 02:45:49.466
<v David McEldowney>This is 4.

1415
02:45:53.167 --> 02:45:53.425
<v David McEldowney>There we go.

1416
02:45:53.490 --> 02:45:53.895
<v David McEldowney>Thank you.

1417
02:45:54.702 --> 02:46:00.878
<v David McEldowney>Following the initial property transfer, the heart of the MOU addresses the remaining lands, which you see on your screen now.

1418
02:46:01.750 --> 02:46:14.002
<v David McEldowney>As you can see, the property on the north end is owned 100% by ODOT, while the other parcels are jointly owned 60/40, with the city having 60% and the state having 40%.

1419
02:46:15.003 --> 02:46:31.618
<v David McEldowney>The MOU provides the city with options to either A, completely acquire ODOT's property interests through cash purchase, B, trade the property rights or trade property rights of equivalent value with ODOT to decouple joint ownership.

1420
02:46:31.762 --> 02:46:42.908
<v David McEldowney>What that may look like is ODOT would own some of the land, we would own, you know, another part of that land, or C, decouple joint ownership through a combination of property rights and cash.

1421
02:46:44.176 --> 02:46:48.076
<v David McEldowney>All 3 options would allow the city to land bank these parcels for future use.

1422
02:46:49.393 --> 02:46:52.281
<v David McEldowney>The properties would be appraised to determine the market value.

1423
02:46:52.538 --> 02:46:53.195
<v David McEldowney>Slide 5.

1424
02:46:54.384 --> 02:47:09.801
<v David McEldowney>PBOT is requesting that the committee move forward the— or move the ordinance forward to the full council, and that the council authorize the city administrator to approve and accept the transfer deed from ODOT For the 2 parcels next to the International School.

1425
02:47:11.227 --> 02:47:24.977
<v David McEldowney>We are recommending that council authorize PBOT to pursue the terms of the MOU, and if the property trades are recommended under options B or C, return to council and seek authorization for such transactions.

1426
02:47:25.715 --> 02:47:27.333
<v David McEldowney>This concludes our presentation.

1427
02:47:27.413 --> 02:47:29.144
<v David McEldowney>We'd be happy to answer any questions you may have.

1428
02:47:29.720 --> 02:47:30.314
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, David.

1429
02:47:31.163 --> 02:47:31.708
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Smith.

1430
02:47:32.444 --> 02:47:32.540
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

1431
02:47:35.188 --> 02:47:36.343
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you for the presentation.

1432
02:47:36.871 --> 02:47:46.144
<v Loretta Smith>What is the potential for affordable or workforce housing development on these properties, and what would it cost the city to pursue that opportunity?

1433
02:47:46.480 --> 02:47:48.228
<v David McEldowney>That's an excellent question.

1434
02:47:48.742 --> 02:48:06.859
<v David McEldowney>I don't know if the report ever came out, but there was a draft report here a couple years ago that evaluated city-owned properties, and these properties were, I don't know, in the top 15 or 20, whatever it was, for affordable housing properties.

1435
02:48:07.279 --> 02:48:14.457
<v David McEldowney>Not the 2 by the International School per se, but everything else that you saw in that last slide.

1436
02:48:16.469 --> 02:48:21.073
<v David McEldowney>They, as far as the cost, I can't answer that question for you.

1437
02:48:21.138 --> 02:48:23.105
<v David McEldowney>That'd be a Portland Housing Bureau question.

1438
02:48:23.561 --> 02:48:26.816
<v David McEldowney>But I do know that they were high on the list for candidates.

1439
02:48:32.138 --> 02:48:34.334
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks, Chair Clark.

1440
02:48:34.398 --> 02:48:36.176
<v Sameer Kanal>Just a process question on this.

1441
02:48:36.386 --> 02:48:42.907
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, for the— in the, uh, MOU, the, the transfer makes perfect sense to me, and I appreciate it, and I appreciate you being here and all the work.

1442
02:48:44.076 --> 02:48:52.906
<v Sameer Kanal>On the MOU, there's Part 5, uh, which is on inability to perform, and it's what happens if we can't agree, and it says transferring it back.

1443
02:48:53.227 --> 02:49:03.145
<v Sameer Kanal>Why was the default transferring it back as opposed to just paying the If we pay the appraised value, then there is no need.

1444
02:49:03.257 --> 02:49:04.167
<v David McEldowney>There is no default.

1445
02:49:04.799 --> 02:49:10.653
<v David McEldowney>I mean, that is an option that, that would fall in one of the other options that I presented to you.

1446
02:49:11.040 --> 02:49:14.965
<v Sameer Kanal>So maybe outside of the scope of this, it sounds like the preferred option is trading land though.

1447
02:49:16.639 --> 02:49:21.538
<v David McEldowney>Well, I've heard interest in the city acquiring all of the land, all of the ownership.

1448
02:49:21.904 --> 02:49:23.210
<v David McEldowney>And land banking that.

1449
02:49:23.597 --> 02:49:24.163
<v David McEldowney>Yeah.

1450
02:49:26.100 --> 02:49:36.694
<v David McEldowney>But the other options are really if the city is unable to come up with the funds to do that, then that provides us options to trade away portions of that land.

1451
02:49:37.880 --> 02:49:46.887
<v David McEldowney>And the reality of it is if we did that, you'd still have another bite at the apple because of the— and I know Councilor Clark's very familiar with the state's rules.

1452
02:49:47.834 --> 02:49:55.242
<v David McEldowney>Surrounding surplus property, but we would have another crack to acquire that from the state at that point.

1453
02:49:55.370 --> 02:49:58.279
<v David McEldowney>But it shouldn't need to go that far.

1454
02:49:58.841 --> 02:50:08.722
<v David McEldowney>This is just— it's always nice to have an option in an MOU or any agreement that allows you to reset things if you can't reach agreement.

1455
02:50:09.189 --> 02:50:09.638
<v Sameer Kanal>That makes sense.

1456
02:50:09.832 --> 02:50:19.451
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah, I guess just— I appreciate this because clear control of these is a good— it's a city interest, I think, to open the door to future affordable housing or social housing development.

1457
02:50:19.500 --> 02:50:21.170
<v Sameer Kanal>So would love to do that.

1458
02:50:21.234 --> 02:50:23.272
<v Sameer Kanal>And I know many of us care about land banking a lot.

1459
02:50:23.481 --> 02:50:23.818
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks.

1460
02:50:24.043 --> 02:50:25.441
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Councilor Kanal.

1461
02:50:25.504 --> 02:50:27.463
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Green, do you have a question or comment?

1462
02:50:27.593 --> 02:50:31.414
<v Mitch Green>No, I'd just like to move to refer this to the full council with our do-pass recommendation.

1463
02:50:31.702 --> 02:50:32.072
<v Millicent Williams>Second.

1464
02:50:32.344 --> 02:50:32.826
<v Unidentified speaker>Second.

1465
02:50:32.954 --> 02:50:33.388
<v Olivia Clark>Terrific.

1466
02:50:34.014 --> 02:50:38.527
<v Olivia Clark>It's been moved and seconded by Councilor Green and Councilor Kanal.

1467
02:50:39.302 --> 02:50:43.299
<v Olivia Clark>I don't think we have anybody signed up to testify on this, do we?

1468
02:50:43.930 --> 02:50:44.755
<v Keelan McClymont>No one signed up.

1469
02:50:45.225 --> 02:50:45.612
<v Olivia Clark>Great.

1470
02:50:46.018 --> 02:50:51.748
<v Olivia Clark>Um, if there's not any further discussion, uh, will the clerk please call the roll?

1471
02:50:52.959 --> 02:50:53.184
<v Tate White>Green?

1472
02:50:54.814 --> 02:50:54.895
<v Mitch Green>Aye.

1473
02:50:55.734 --> 02:50:56.007
<v Unidentified speaker>Smith?

1474
02:50:56.588 --> 02:50:56.637
<v Loretta Smith>Aye.

1475
02:50:59.574 --> 02:51:00.040
<v Unidentified speaker>Koyama Lane?

1476
02:51:00.702 --> 02:51:00.751
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Aye.

1477
02:51:01.525 --> 02:51:01.832
<v Unidentified speaker>Clark?

1478
02:51:02.171 --> 02:51:02.316
<v Olivia Clark>Aye.

1479
02:51:02.961 --> 02:51:13.680
<v Unidentified speaker>Uh, and with 5 ayes, the motion to refer the ordinance document number 2023- Thank you.

1480
02:51:13.680 --> 02:51:14.500
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, David.

1481
02:51:14.500 --> 02:51:15.920
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, staff, for being here.

1482
02:51:15.920 --> 02:51:19.700
<v Olivia Clark>I know it's been kind of an arduous, arduous deal.

1483
02:51:19.700 --> 02:51:20.489
<v Olivia Clark>Appreciate your time.

1484
02:51:21.739 --> 02:51:24.219
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, colleagues, look at us, we caught up.

1485
02:51:24.219 --> 02:51:26.540
<v Olivia Clark>We're, we're, we're a good team.

1486
02:51:26.540 --> 02:51:29.809
<v Olivia Clark>Um, our next meeting is in 2 weeks.

1487
02:51:29.940 --> 02:51:31.059
<v Olivia Clark>What, you're laughing at me?

1488
02:51:31.059 --> 02:51:31.360
<v Olivia Clark>No, I like it.

1489
02:51:31.360 --> 02:51:32.329
<v Raylee Stark>We just got a gold star.

1490
02:51:32.459 --> 02:51:33.180
<v Olivia Clark>We are.

1491
02:51:34.369 --> 02:51:37.100
<v Olivia Clark>Um, just call me Teacher Clark.

1492
02:51:37.227 --> 02:51:38.416
<v Olivia Clark>Yeah, that's good.

1493
02:51:38.530 --> 02:51:44.924
<v Olivia Clark>Um, we're going to reconvene on October the 27th, and we'll continue the discussion of autonomous vehicles.

1494
02:51:45.438 --> 02:51:49.824
<v Olivia Clark>We'll have probably some more administrative items from PBOT, I'm thinking.

1495
02:51:50.579 --> 02:51:54.418
<v Olivia Clark>We'll see what— if we have any other time for other things that came up today.

1496
02:51:55.495 --> 02:52:00.668
<v Olivia Clark>So if there's not any other discussion, I will adjourn the meeting of the Public Works Committee.

