WEBVTT

1
00:07:38.658 --> 00:07:40.629
<v Jamie Dunphy>Good afternoon, colleagues.

2
00:07:40.709 --> 00:07:44.608
<v Jamie Dunphy>Members of the council and the general public, I'm calling to order this work session of the Portland City Council.

3
00:07:44.673 --> 00:07:48.411
<v Jamie Dunphy>It is 2:01 PM on Wednesday, October 7th.

4
00:07:49.824 --> 00:07:54.187
<v Jamie Dunphy>Colleagues, welcome once again to the budget, the topic that never stops giving.

5
00:07:55.086 --> 00:08:01.281
<v Jamie Dunphy>Uh, we're here today to kick off our discussion of the Fall Technical Adjustment Ordinance, known colloquially here as the Fall TAO.

6
00:08:02.307 --> 00:08:08.389
<v Jamie Dunphy>Uh, to preview briefly the process ahead, the fall supplemental budget has been filed and is referred to the Committee of the Whole.

7
00:08:09.206 --> 00:08:14.512
<v Jamie Dunphy>As with all items referred by my office, it is visible to councilors and the public on the council documents page.

8
00:08:15.538 --> 00:08:19.305
<v Jamie Dunphy>Today's work session is intended to do the major informational work.

9
00:08:19.641 --> 00:08:26.742
<v Jamie Dunphy>By the end of today, we should have a strong shared understanding of the goals and the content of the TAO as proposed by the administration.

10
00:08:27.975 --> 00:08:36.534
<v Jamie Dunphy>In these 3 hours, staff will walk us through the ordinance as well as discuss and ask questions in preparation for the detailed work that will happen in the Committee of the Whole.

11
00:08:37.658 --> 00:08:39.570
<v Jamie Dunphy>Next week, we will take the item up in committee.

12
00:08:40.227 --> 00:08:46.714
<v Jamie Dunphy>The committee is the place— is the time and the place for us to debate and adopt any major amendments to the ordinance authored by councilors.

13
00:08:47.548 --> 00:08:55.464
<v Jamie Dunphy>Assuming that ordinance passes from committee, we will have agenda time held on the last 2 weeks of October in full council for the first and second readings.

14
00:08:56.057 --> 00:09:02.447
<v Jamie Dunphy>This is intended as a time for smaller tweaks and changes in response to public testimony on the document that has come out of committee.

15
00:09:03.506 --> 00:09:15.032
<v Jamie Dunphy>As I've said many times in this room, one of the most important stories of the first 2 years of the budget process under the new form of government is the steady transition in how documents that become— that come before council are developed before we see them.

16
00:09:15.769 --> 00:09:20.321
<v Jamie Dunphy>A lot of last year's fall TAO process was spent in discussion about carryover encumbrances.

17
00:09:21.154 --> 00:09:25.995
<v Jamie Dunphy>Bureaus still basically had latitude to set their own terms as to what was encumbered carryover and what was not.

18
00:09:26.508 --> 00:09:30.307
<v Jamie Dunphy>As we'll hear early in the presentation, the encumbrance policy has been tightened.

19
00:09:31.077 --> 00:09:38.384
<v Jamie Dunphy>We are slowly and continually moving this city government from a basket of quasi-independent bureaus to a single government.

20
00:09:38.961 --> 00:09:39.924
<v Jamie Dunphy>We're not there yet.

21
00:09:40.471 --> 00:09:43.859
<v Jamie Dunphy>There will be more problems, and we are absolutely going to talk about them.

22
00:09:44.245 --> 00:09:48.322
<v Jamie Dunphy>But I think it's a good sign that the problems of this year are not the same problems we had last year.

23
00:09:49.173 --> 00:09:50.458
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay, enough fellowship.

24
00:09:50.940 --> 00:09:56.464
<v Jamie Dunphy>CFO Biery and Budget Director Levine will be walking us through this presentation today.

25
00:09:56.784 --> 00:09:58.166
<v Jamie Dunphy>The presentation is in 3 parts.

26
00:09:58.293 --> 00:10:01.297
<v Jamie Dunphy>We will take a break midway through the second section around 3:30.

27
00:10:01.929 --> 00:10:06.418
<v Jamie Dunphy>And if and when we get to the budget calendar, I'll offer some additional framing and an update from my office.

28
00:10:06.548 --> 00:10:08.428
<v Jamie Dunphy>With that, Jonas and Ruth, take it away.

29
00:10:10.070 --> 00:10:10.504
<v Jonas Biery>Great.

30
00:10:11.212 --> 00:10:12.130
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you, Council President.

31
00:10:12.178 --> 00:10:14.610
<v Jonas Biery>For the record, Jonas Biery, Chief Financial Officer.

32
00:10:14.836 --> 00:10:17.782
<v Jonas Biery>And thank you for the tee-up regarding what we expect.

33
00:10:17.831 --> 00:10:27.028
<v Jonas Biery>And yeah, just to lean into that, you know, we're hoping that this space is really providing a preview for you of some of the key information.

34
00:10:27.994 --> 00:10:37.897
<v Jonas Biery>And opening up some of that initial dialogue so we can hopefully make more— most efficient use of our time at Finance and Governance Committee next week, and then ultimately the 2 council meetings at the end of October.

35
00:10:39.772 --> 00:10:44.879
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you, Council President, for teeing up some of the improvements that we've talked about.

36
00:10:44.993 --> 00:10:46.749
<v Jonas Biery>And we can skip ahead one slide, please.

37
00:10:47.571 --> 00:10:56.537
<v Jonas Biery>Really glad to have those recognized and wanted to provide a little more context about those to frame up some of those process improvements.

38
00:10:56.585 --> 00:10:56.715
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you.

39
00:10:57.623 --> 00:11:19.777
<v Jonas Biery>Ruth's going to talk about the numbers in details, but really wanted to highlight some of the upgrades that will emphasize sort of the broader conversations we're having around better analysis and quality of information, improving transparency, and aligning to initiatives that we've talked about recently in the context of financial stabilization.

40
00:11:20.625 --> 00:11:28.177
<v Jonas Biery>I believe that all of these improvements are consistent with feedback and requests we've heard from councilors, including some dialogue at this morning's council meeting.

41
00:11:28.225 --> 00:11:28.400
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you.

42
00:11:29.283 --> 00:11:32.664
<v Jonas Biery>Regarding consistency, predictability, and transparency.

43
00:11:32.729 --> 00:11:37.105
<v Jonas Biery>Those are values that we share and hope to continue prioritizing.

44
00:11:37.618 --> 00:11:41.754
<v Jonas Biery>So greatly appreciate council support as we continuously improve our processes.

45
00:11:42.731 --> 00:11:48.214
<v Jonas Biery>The key upgrades in this package in the fall TAO that you'll be considering in the coming weeks.

46
00:11:48.678 --> 00:11:53.904
<v Jonas Biery>The first is doing this work earlier and making more space for dialogue with you.

47
00:11:54.995 --> 00:12:04.875
<v Jonas Biery>The second, compared to recent years, we're expanding and enhancing our reporting on prior prior year fund balances and on contingencies and reserves, and we'll have some detail on that.

48
00:12:05.581 --> 00:12:14.937
<v Jonas Biery>In this fall TAO, we're taking leadership to recognize reserves in alignment with new guidance from the Department of Revenue.

49
00:12:15.628 --> 00:12:27.312
<v Jonas Biery>This change will also align with our own prior discussions on improving information regarding reserves, and it's included a robust citywide review of all contingencies and reserves.

50
00:12:27.729 --> 00:12:50.465
<v Jonas Biery>Ultimately, this is a huge transparency improvement, really a big level up and will be, I think, very, very helpful in the future and responsive to some difficult conversations we had in the past so that we can more properly categorize information as contingency versus reserves and be more clear about what those reserves are actually intended to be held for.

51
00:12:51.412 --> 00:12:53.466
<v Jonas Biery>And we'll share more detail about that.

52
00:12:54.703 --> 00:12:55.072
<v Jonas Biery>The—.

53
00:12:55.682 --> 00:13:14.774
<v Jonas Biery>The TAO package also includes creation and formal implementation of a business license tax stabilization reserve and the associated policy with that, which is in response to a fiscal 26-27 budget note and is also in alignment with the financial stabilization recommendations and actions that we discussed a couple of weeks ago.

54
00:13:16.120 --> 00:13:24.649
<v Jonas Biery>With a budget as large as the city's, there's always going to be a lot going on within the line item details, and we're certainly happy to share every single one of those with you.

55
00:13:25.658 --> 00:13:41.977
<v Jonas Biery>However, I do want to observe that with the exception of some kind of large net-zero packages related to the reserves reclassification I just mentioned and related to organizational realignment, generally this is a simpler and smaller fall TAO compared to prior years.

56
00:13:42.025 --> 00:13:50.097
<v Jonas Biery>And I think that's by intention and design and responding to some of the feedback that we've heard and tried to manage through our budget system.

57
00:13:51.013 --> 00:13:52.826
<v Jonas Biery>Council President mentioned encumbrance carryovers.

58
00:13:53.885 --> 00:13:55.153
<v Jonas Biery>That's received a lot of airtime.

59
00:13:55.410 --> 00:14:10.160
<v Jonas Biery>As a result of that feedback, we've instituted a much more kind of restrictive expectation around how encumbrance carryovers are used and a much more robust analytical process related to requests that do come forward.

60
00:14:10.578 --> 00:14:17.047
<v Jonas Biery>And so that improvement has limited the amount and volume of encumbrance carryovers compared to prior years.

61
00:14:17.095 --> 00:14:18.876
<v Jonas Biery>And so we'll share those details as well.

62
00:14:20.048 --> 00:14:26.126
<v Jonas Biery>Lastly, generally, This fall TAO continues the city's movement towards financial stabilization.

63
00:14:26.864 --> 00:14:37.043
<v Jonas Biery>I do expect we'll still be facing a budget challenge in fiscal '27-'28, and we obviously can't be complacent about the work we have remaining in fiscal '26-'27.

64
00:14:37.620 --> 00:14:46.389
<v Jonas Biery>But the big picture today will show that we're essentially on target with the adopted budget, and that's a massive improvement from where we stood at this point a year ago.

65
00:14:47.623 --> 00:15:09.379
<v Jonas Biery>Budgets are inherently complex, can sometimes be arcane, and budget conversations are rarely easy, but I did want to just take a minute and kind of set the tone to emphasize the effort that's been made and will continue to be made to shift away from some of those challenges of the past and move us towards an environment of transparency, confidence, and trust.

66
00:15:09.379 --> 00:15:12.200
<v Jonas Biery>All right, so Council President previewed the agenda.

67
00:15:12.200 --> 00:15:12.980
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, you can skip forward.

68
00:15:12.980 --> 00:15:13.899
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you.

69
00:15:13.899 --> 00:15:15.480
<v Jonas Biery>So kind of 3 sections.

70
00:15:15.480 --> 00:15:18.289
<v Jonas Biery>The first will be the prior year reporting.

71
00:15:18.399 --> 00:15:21.120
<v Jonas Biery>It's an area where we've heard requests for additional transparency.

72
00:15:21.220 --> 00:15:22.659
<v Jonas Biery>We agree with that.

73
00:15:22.659 --> 00:15:27.123
<v Jonas Biery>So I want to take some time to walk through some of the details around the the priority reporting.

74
00:15:27.541 --> 00:15:38.520
<v Jonas Biery>Second will be to talk about the proposed actions in the fall TAO, the adjustment ordinance itself, which includes some technical adjustments and a small amount of more discretionary items.

75
00:15:39.097 --> 00:15:42.356
<v Jonas Biery>And then we'll move to talking about a budget calendar.

76
00:15:43.592 --> 00:15:52.984
<v Jonas Biery>And just noting that the budget calendar, as we get there, processing calendar conversation does reflect the feedback that we heard from you all in the September 10th work session around process improvements.

77
00:15:53.032 --> 00:15:53.304
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you.

78
00:15:54.859 --> 00:15:59.456
<v Jamie Dunphy>And colleagues, I'll just note there's a dedicated time for Q&A, so I will not be having folks interrupt.

79
00:15:59.552 --> 00:16:01.331
<v Jamie Dunphy>Please hold your Q&A until there's time for it.

80
00:16:01.412 --> 00:16:01.748
<v Jonas Biery>So great.

81
00:16:01.812 --> 00:16:02.822
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, thank you, Council President.

82
00:16:02.870 --> 00:16:08.139
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, we do intend to have a little space after each section, so because they are kind of discrete topics to some degree.

83
00:16:09.245 --> 00:16:10.510
<v Jonas Biery>All right, so let's dig in.

84
00:16:11.489 --> 00:16:17.993
<v Jonas Biery>Wanted to start officially with a reminder of kind of what the fall TAO is and why we do a fall budget adjustment.

85
00:16:18.553 --> 00:16:24.448
<v Jonas Biery>The first rule of a mid-year budget adjustment is to maintain continued compliance with budget law and with city policy.

86
00:16:25.267 --> 00:16:40.239
<v Jonas Biery>Mid-year adjustments are allowed for urgent or unforeseen expense adjustments, to reconcile fund balances, to adjust contingencies, and et cetera, to match beginning fund balances, to align expenditures to city policy, and in limited circumstances to make other changes.

87
00:16:41.393 --> 00:16:57.390
<v Jonas Biery>The fall TAO is an important moment to review prior year actual expenditures, which are now known now that the fiscal year has ended and we've been able to do that work, and to understand why those amounts have changed and how those changes relate to fund balances and other potential decisions.

88
00:16:58.690 --> 00:17:04.236
<v Jonas Biery>So the first topic is prior year reporting and updates on contingency and reserve amounts.

89
00:17:05.342 --> 00:17:06.608
<v Jonas Biery>Why do we do prior year reporting?

90
00:17:07.346 --> 00:17:11.594
<v Jonas Biery>It's a best practice to track, monitor, and report on budget spending and status.

91
00:17:12.234 --> 00:17:41.565
<v Jonas Biery>And while reporting and monitoring of budgets has gone through sort of peaks and valleys at the city over the years, where sometimes we've done a little more robust work, in recent years done maybe a little bit less, we're currently working citywide to improve the budget monitoring process, to improve the reporting cadence, And also to ensure that that work is being done in a consistent and coordinated manner that can be sort of strategically implemented citywide rather than being maybe more ad hoc and inconsistent as it has been in the past.

92
00:17:42.382 --> 00:17:49.113
<v Jonas Biery>Improved budget tracking and reporting is also responsive to a prior budget note, I believe, Mario 3 from '25-'26.

93
00:17:50.153 --> 00:18:05.135
<v Jonas Biery>The budget monitoring detail that we're going to talk about next also provides context for why specific TAO adjustments may occur and helps illuminate why we need to make those changes to remain in budget balance and compliance.

94
00:18:07.210 --> 00:18:10.099
<v Jonas Biery>Lastly, priority reporting can help inform future decision-making.

95
00:18:10.212 --> 00:18:19.758
<v Jonas Biery>For example, if we observe underspending occurring every year in the same or similar circumstances, that may indicate that we actually need to make a change in what we're budgeting for.

96
00:18:19.823 --> 00:18:21.296
<v Jonas Biery>And so that's another important outcome.

97
00:18:22.969 --> 00:18:25.790
<v Jonas Biery>And then before I hand to Ruth, just a couple of caveats.

98
00:18:26.576 --> 00:18:29.351
<v Jonas Biery>First, you know, we're a large and complex organization.

99
00:18:30.025 --> 00:18:36.903
<v Jonas Biery>Financial data changes every single day as we make payments and receive payments, and data can often be messy.

100
00:18:38.042 --> 00:18:44.568
<v Jonas Biery>Actual expenditures differ from expected budgets for many reasons, and those reasons can sometimes not be super clear.

101
00:18:44.712 --> 00:18:56.204
<v Jonas Biery>And so that's part of the broader process improvement, both to make that clear in the initial budget adoption and to make that clear in ongoing reporting and to make that clear, of course, in these moments of adjustments.

102
00:18:58.203 --> 00:19:10.526
<v Jonas Biery>That sort of real or perceived obscurity also makes clear why moments like this are really important so we can have transparent communication and dialogue about what's happening.

103
00:19:11.587 --> 00:19:17.039
<v Jonas Biery>The second caveat is that it's not unusual for fund balances to change.

104
00:19:17.105 --> 00:19:19.057
<v Jonas Biery>We actually would expect that they change.

105
00:19:21.616 --> 00:19:21.778
<v Jonas Biery>They—.

106
00:19:21.778 --> 00:19:29.963
<v Jonas Biery>We typically would expect that they would actually increase, that fund balances would increase, i.e., be underspent, rather than decrease, i.e., be overspent.

107
00:19:30.028 --> 00:19:31.095
<v Jonas Biery>We don't want overspent budgets.

108
00:19:31.159 --> 00:19:32.451
<v Jonas Biery>We do want underspent budgets.

109
00:19:33.018 --> 00:19:37.496
<v Jonas Biery>That is why often we have additional fund balance that requires adjustment.

110
00:19:38.191 --> 00:19:40.817
<v Jonas Biery>That exists for a variety of reasons, all of which are healthy.

111
00:19:41.211 --> 00:19:55.933
<v Jonas Biery>Conservative forecasting, as I mentioned, which might mean revenues are coming in higher than expected, intentional efforts to reduce or eliminate costs, and then potentially program delays, which might be either anticipated or unexpected.

112
00:19:56.688 --> 00:20:12.713
<v Jonas Biery>So with that kind of tee-up about why we want to talk about priority reporting and why I think you'll be interested in it, Ruth is going to move to doing kind of a hypothetical explainer about fund balance, And then get into some of the actual numerical changes, importantly including contingency and reserve information.

113
00:20:14.900 --> 00:20:15.093
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Great.

114
00:20:15.255 --> 00:20:17.950
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay, so I'm starting way at the beginning here.

115
00:20:18.951 --> 00:20:25.944
<v Unidentified speaker>I just thought this was helpful because this is a confusing topic even for those of us who do this professionally and do it every year.

116
00:20:26.334 --> 00:20:29.344
<v Unidentified speaker>So I just, I thought maybe for the public this would be a helpful thing.

117
00:20:29.457 --> 00:20:39.509
<v Unidentified speaker>So this is a very simplified hypothetical example that's sort of in some sequential slides here to demonstrate why these true-ups are necessary and how they work.

118
00:20:40.423 --> 00:20:44.488
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, so in this example, we're starting with a prior year budget.

119
00:20:44.615 --> 00:20:46.688
<v Unidentified speaker>Obviously, in this case, this is '25-'26.

120
00:20:47.329 --> 00:20:50.542
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, revenues and expenditures are balanced as is required.

121
00:20:50.784 --> 00:20:55.265
<v Unidentified speaker>There are program expenses, all the stuff we pay for, and there's contingency.

122
00:20:56.404 --> 00:21:07.734
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, as Jonas mentioned, We, you know, typically per financial policy, we sort of are conservative in forecasting both our revenues and expenses.

123
00:21:07.832 --> 00:21:19.625
<v Unidentified speaker>So in this hypothetical example, the revenues come in a little bit higher at the end of the year than they were budgeted to, and the program expenses come in a little bit lower at the end of the year than was budgeted.

124
00:21:19.705 --> 00:21:22.086
<v Unidentified speaker>Mm-hmm.

125
00:21:23.915 --> 00:21:27.234
<v Unidentified speaker>And, you know, this, as we said, this is not an uncommon occurrence.

126
00:21:28.076 --> 00:21:32.740
<v Unidentified speaker>In reality, but it's not the only situation that could arise.

127
00:21:35.799 --> 00:21:42.421
<v Unidentified speaker>In order to maintain balanced budgets and for accounting purposes, the funds, the revenues and expenses have to equal at the end of the year.

128
00:21:43.112 --> 00:21:49.915
<v Unidentified speaker>That gap between the actual revenues and actual expenses is made up by actual ending fund balance.

129
00:21:50.028 --> 00:21:51.057
<v Unidentified speaker>That's the term.

130
00:21:52.182 --> 00:21:52.489
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

131
00:21:53.558 --> 00:21:55.500
<v Unidentified speaker>So now we move to the next year.

132
00:21:56.095 --> 00:22:08.000
<v Unidentified speaker>And as a reminder, you don't know what those actual numbers are typically for us until mid-August sometime, right, until after the fiscal year has closed and we're able to do all of those accounting true-ups and the like.

133
00:22:09.027 --> 00:22:13.439
<v Unidentified speaker>At that point, we have already adopted a budget, obviously under law.

134
00:22:14.161 --> 00:22:17.659
<v Unidentified speaker>And so we don't— at the time of the adoption, you don't know what that ending fund balance is.

135
00:22:17.770 --> 00:22:21.237
<v Unidentified speaker>So in this example, you've got a little bit more revenue and a little bit more expense.

136
00:22:21.285 --> 00:22:21.348
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah.

137
00:22:21.685 --> 00:22:26.372
<v Unidentified speaker>In the current fiscal year than in the previous fiscal year, and they're both balanced.

138
00:22:26.998 --> 00:22:40.397
<v Unidentified speaker>Now we come to the fall and we have to recognize that ending fund balance that appeared in at the end of the fiscal of the prior fiscal year and add it to our budget.

139
00:22:40.478 --> 00:22:43.688
<v Unidentified speaker>In this case, it's a, it's an increase in the during the true-up.

140
00:22:44.314 --> 00:22:51.278
<v Unidentified speaker>And as you can see in this example, so increases, that becomes what's called beginning fund balance, which is a revenue.

141
00:22:51.326 --> 00:22:51.375
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

142
00:22:51.792 --> 00:22:54.090
<v Unidentified speaker>Because it's extra resources, essentially.

143
00:22:54.830 --> 00:22:58.592
<v Unidentified speaker>And that has to be matched on the expenditure side by something.

144
00:22:58.785 --> 00:23:06.028
<v Unidentified speaker>In this example, it's matched both by an increase in both program expenses and contingency, as an example.

145
00:23:08.540 --> 00:23:13.486
<v Unidentified speaker>I note that this is a simplified example, although it's not an uncommon one.

146
00:23:16.343 --> 00:23:17.454
<v Unidentified speaker>But a couple of things.

147
00:23:17.553 --> 00:23:27.330
<v Unidentified speaker>The sort of true-up of ending fund balance and the expenses, the change in expenses is rarely kind of one-to-one when you get to the fall, right?

148
00:23:27.492 --> 00:23:33.315
<v Unidentified speaker>First of all, it could be split between program expenses and contingency, and there's often other stuff going on.

149
00:23:33.363 --> 00:23:36.771
<v Unidentified speaker>There might be other revenues changing, other expenditures changing.

150
00:23:36.819 --> 00:23:42.307
<v Unidentified speaker>So it often can be a little confusing once you get to the numbers in the fall.

151
00:23:42.921 --> 00:23:48.478
<v Unidentified speaker>We will, however, as part of this presentation, be going through the specific fund balance adjustments for all of the funds.

152
00:23:48.542 --> 00:23:48.853
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

153
00:23:49.667 --> 00:23:57.175
<v Unidentified speaker>And providing a spreadsheet after today that has all of the details about the contingencies and reserves.

154
00:23:58.390 --> 00:24:05.338
<v Unidentified speaker>So hopefully that will make it a little bit more transparent and that this explainer will help you to make sense of those numbers.

155
00:24:08.266 --> 00:24:08.539
<v Unidentified speaker>All right.

156
00:24:08.780 --> 00:24:16.586
<v Unidentified speaker>So, and just to really hit home on this, Why do we update the fund balances?

157
00:24:16.634 --> 00:24:19.080
<v Unidentified speaker>So why can't you just leave the ending fund balance there?

158
00:24:19.596 --> 00:24:22.381
<v Unidentified speaker>You have to reflect all of the city's resources in the budget.

159
00:24:24.460 --> 00:24:25.413
<v Unidentified speaker>And then what does it mean?

160
00:24:25.769 --> 00:24:29.505
<v Unidentified speaker>I touched on this a little bit, but what does it mean to update the fund balances in the fall TAO?

161
00:24:30.135 --> 00:24:31.478
<v Unidentified speaker>Does it mean there's new money?

162
00:24:32.000 --> 00:24:34.138
<v Unidentified speaker>Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn't.

163
00:24:34.220 --> 00:24:38.354
<v Unidentified speaker>So I gave a couple of examples of how this could play out differently.

164
00:24:39.352 --> 00:24:52.996
<v Unidentified speaker>These are not the only 2 examples, but— In one example, there's kind of a multi-year capital project that results in fund balance in year 1 because the capital project wasn't completed, and maybe that was even planned to not be completed in the first year.

165
00:24:53.525 --> 00:24:58.895
<v Unidentified speaker>Those expenses then travel with the revenue that becomes beginning fund balance.

166
00:24:58.976 --> 00:25:02.117
<v Unidentified speaker>The expenses, the obligation travels to the next fiscal year as well.

167
00:25:02.759 --> 00:25:05.373
<v Unidentified speaker>So there may not be another dollar available.

168
00:25:05.436 --> 00:25:06.815
<v Unidentified speaker>It's just the same work that's moved to the next fiscal year.

169
00:25:07.057 --> 00:25:07.557
<v Unidentified speaker>Fiscal year.

170
00:25:08.121 --> 00:25:19.114
<v Unidentified speaker>In the second example, it does result in new resources because, you know, again, maybe this is— we've got a volatile revenue stream, we've conservatively forecast it so it comes in with excess revenue.

171
00:25:19.517 --> 00:25:25.263
<v Unidentified speaker>There may be some new revenue available that we, you know, having closed the fiscal year, know came in.

172
00:25:26.848 --> 00:25:32.027
<v Unidentified speaker>There are numerous other ways that this could play out, but just to kind of highlight that.

173
00:25:33.020 --> 00:25:35.271
<v Unidentified speaker>And then what happens to those fund balances?

174
00:25:35.385 --> 00:25:40.588
<v Unidentified speaker>Well, Council obviously has to appropriate and make the decisions about all of them.

175
00:25:41.056 --> 00:25:46.480
<v Unidentified speaker>There is financial policy in some cases, and we're going to talk more about some of that later in the presentation today.

176
00:25:49.119 --> 00:25:55.962
<v Unidentified speaker>So the next slide looks at general fund ending fund balance and budgeted beginning fund balance over time.

177
00:25:56.010 --> 00:26:04.238
<v Unidentified speaker>So essentially the same as those graphs I just showed you in the hypothetical example, but the actual general fund numbers over time.

178
00:26:07.385 --> 00:26:10.733
<v Unidentified speaker>And let's see, a couple of things to note about this.

179
00:26:11.122 --> 00:26:16.460
<v Unidentified speaker>So the difference between the blue and the yellow is what you're sort of truing up in the next fiscal year.

180
00:26:17.036 --> 00:26:28.647
<v Unidentified speaker>It's not the case, though, that the entire gap is sort of available because there are some required adjustments that have to be made, and we'll talk more about those for this year later in the presentation.

181
00:26:30.055 --> 00:26:35.018
<v Unidentified speaker>The other obvious thing to note here is the shape of this graph is unusual.

182
00:26:35.195 --> 00:26:39.694
<v Unidentified speaker>I think the— and kind of raises questions about why it is.

183
00:26:39.807 --> 00:26:51.409
<v Unidentified speaker>And the big reason is there was sort of a bump in the snake, I guess, in fiscal year '22-'23, because you can see that really big gap in '21-'22 immediately post-COVID.

184
00:26:53.353 --> 00:26:58.607
<v Unidentified speaker>That created a whole bunch of one-time resource that we've talked about a lot as kind of the fiscal cliff.

185
00:26:59.468 --> 00:27:02.068
<v Unidentified speaker>And it took several years to work through that, right?

186
00:27:02.116 --> 00:27:07.913
<v Unidentified speaker>The more one-time you have allocated, the more is likely to carry over into the next year for several years in a row.

187
00:27:08.797 --> 00:27:14.560
<v Unidentified speaker>We're now back down to sort of below our pre-COVID numbers on this.

188
00:27:15.042 --> 00:27:24.259
<v Unidentified speaker>For this year, part of the reason beginning fund balance is so low is because we actually dipped into our contingencies during '25-'26 to make it through the fiscal year.

189
00:27:24.757 --> 00:27:33.950
<v Unidentified speaker>So often part of beginning fund balance is contingencies that once we get to spring, we say, great, we didn't need this, we can put it into next year as beginning fund balance.

190
00:27:34.416 --> 00:27:40.057
<v Unidentified speaker>We didn't have much of that this year, and so that's why we're kind of historically low in the current fiscal year.

191
00:27:42.817 --> 00:27:46.038
<v Unidentified speaker>And I will talk more later in the presentation about what that means for the fall TAP.

192
00:27:48.082 --> 00:27:48.919
<v Unidentified speaker>General fund returns.

193
00:27:50.144 --> 00:28:01.118
<v Unidentified speaker>As Jonas mentioned, we did a bit more prior year reporting than we have with bureaus in recent years, particularly around the general fund, to look at essentially where was their underspending.

194
00:28:01.954 --> 00:28:09.897
<v Unidentified speaker>This slide rolls all of that information up general fund-wide because I didn't have time to go through all 26 bureaus with you.

195
00:28:09.994 --> 00:28:16.087
<v Unidentified speaker>But we do have additional information, and if there are specific questions, we can come back next thank you.

196
00:28:16.167 --> 00:28:17.467
<v Unidentified speaker>I'll be back next week to answer them.

197
00:28:17.595 --> 00:28:26.384
<v Unidentified speaker>But essentially what this shows you is 2 kinds of general fund returns, one from last spring.

198
00:28:27.858 --> 00:28:30.874
<v Unidentified speaker>And so you can think of this as like true underspending.

199
00:28:30.986 --> 00:28:33.969
<v Unidentified speaker>Like it doesn't have the revenue side of the picture.

200
00:28:34.032 --> 00:28:35.653
<v Unidentified speaker>It's just the expenditure side of the picture.

201
00:28:35.717 --> 00:28:39.967
<v Unidentified speaker>How much less did we spend than we had originally budgeted for?

202
00:28:40.448 --> 00:29:02.510
<v Unidentified speaker>So $6.5 million was So the $14.8 million was sort of returned to the general fund in the spring, and then looking at the discretionary portion of the kind of the end of the fiscal year budget to what happened— sorry, the last revised budget to what happened at the end of the fiscal year in the general fund, that was $14.8 million.

203
00:29:03.423 --> 00:29:11.467
<v Unidentified speaker>Of that total, $4.6 million is proposed to be carried over through encumbrance carryovers in the fall, and we'll talk more about that.

204
00:29:11.530 --> 00:29:11.626
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

205
00:29:12.173 --> 00:29:12.221
<v Loretta Smith>Yes.

206
00:29:12.334 --> 00:29:13.778
<v Unidentified speaker>And we'll talk about that number later today.

207
00:29:15.047 --> 00:29:22.096
<v Unidentified speaker>But the net result of all of that is $16.8 million in what I would call like true general fund underspending.

208
00:29:23.316 --> 00:29:24.922
<v Unidentified speaker>A couple of things to note about this.

209
00:29:25.901 --> 00:29:32.773
<v Unidentified speaker>That is out of a total general fund allocation number of about $875 million.

210
00:29:33.304 --> 00:29:35.391
<v Unidentified speaker>So it's less than 2% of the total.

211
00:29:35.550 --> 00:29:36.289
<v Unidentified speaker>So that's one thing.

212
00:29:37.398 --> 00:29:37.511
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

213
00:29:37.787 --> 00:29:41.308
<v Unidentified speaker>Which is kind of roughly what I would expect.

214
00:29:43.710 --> 00:29:53.723
<v Unidentified speaker>Another thing is it includes $6 million of contingency that wasn't drawn, which includes $4.3 million that we budgeted as beginning fund balance.

215
00:29:54.142 --> 00:29:58.675
<v Unidentified speaker>That was from the housing ordinance that happened in the spring last year.

216
00:30:01.055 --> 00:30:12.135
<v Unidentified speaker>And then the other roughly $11 million is split between personnel vacancy savings and external materials and services underspending.

217
00:30:13.089 --> 00:30:23.555
<v Unidentified speaker>Both of those on some level I think can be tied to directions to restrict spending from the city administrator last year.

218
00:30:24.334 --> 00:30:28.847
<v Unidentified speaker>There was a hiring freeze in place, so that certainly resulted in some vacancy savings.

219
00:30:29.532 --> 00:30:35.123
<v Unidentified speaker>And then there were directions to, you know, reduce contract spending.

220
00:30:35.396 --> 00:30:39.535
<v Unidentified speaker>And we have more details on all of this and can provide additional during Q&A.

221
00:30:39.663 --> 00:30:44.828
<v Unidentified speaker>I have some of it handy, and then we can also provide more details in spreadsheet form after today.

222
00:30:46.013 --> 00:30:52.955
<v Unidentified speaker>But I just wanted to give you sort of the high-level view of this kind of prior year reporting that we completed in the general fund.

223
00:30:56.138 --> 00:31:17.732
<v Unidentified speaker>All right, and then outside of the general fund, in terms of fund balance adjustments, this slide shows you the biggest ones by dollar figure in terms of that difference between what was sort of expected, what was budgeted, and then how did it actually end at the end of the fiscal year.

224
00:31:18.380 --> 00:31:20.708
<v Unidentified speaker>And you can see it goes in both directions.

225
00:31:20.820 --> 00:31:23.342
<v Unidentified speaker>Some of them are a reduction and some of them are an increase.

226
00:31:24.042 --> 00:31:24.925
<v Unidentified speaker>In fund balance.

227
00:31:25.553 --> 00:31:34.287
<v Unidentified speaker>I'm not going to go through each line on this, but as I mentioned earlier, the— we'll provide a full spreadsheet on the contingencies and reserves.

228
00:31:34.400 --> 00:31:43.551
<v Unidentified speaker>And then exhibit 2, which is posted with the ordinance, has all of the appropriation changes, and there's for every single fund.

229
00:31:43.615 --> 00:31:50.410
<v Unidentified speaker>And so there's more details on every fund, um, in that exhibit once when you see that.

230
00:31:52.065 --> 00:31:54.491
<v Unidentified speaker>A couple of things to highlight here as well.

231
00:31:55.199 --> 00:32:01.278
<v Unidentified speaker>You'll see a lot of these relate to capital and debt financing, and that's pretty common.

232
00:32:01.392 --> 00:32:17.353
<v Unidentified speaker>A lot of the big swings in fund balance result from these multi-year capital projects or from debt financing, which obviously has multiple technical entries involved in multiple funds where the funding comes into one fund and then gets dispersed out to other funds.

233
00:32:17.404 --> 00:32:26.000
<v Unidentified speaker>So one delay in the— in a bond issuance has a big swing, um, in this case for multiple funds in the city.

234
00:32:28.270 --> 00:32:37.827
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, and then PSF at the bottom is the sort of multi-year projects, um, where the funding is carried from one fiscal year to the next.

235
00:32:40.160 --> 00:32:44.571
<v Unidentified speaker>All right, we're going to switch topics a little bit.

236
00:32:44.718 --> 00:32:45.743
<v Unidentified speaker>The next section of the thank you.

237
00:32:45.791 --> 00:32:48.232
<v Unidentified speaker>So the next presentation is on contingencies and reserves.

238
00:32:48.280 --> 00:32:55.410
<v Unidentified speaker>And as I sort of said, this is connected in some ways to the fund balance conversation, but it's also a distinct topic in and of itself.

239
00:32:56.711 --> 00:32:59.279
<v Unidentified speaker>And we're recommending a change in how we're budgeting this.

240
00:32:59.441 --> 00:33:06.472
<v Unidentified speaker>And so I've asked Allegra Wilhite, who's the Executive Director of the Tax Supervising Conservation Commission, to come.

241
00:33:07.050 --> 00:33:07.355
<v Unidentified speaker>Here she is.

242
00:33:07.773 --> 00:33:10.247
<v Unidentified speaker>So she's going to tee it up, and then I'll go into more of the details.

243
00:33:12.124 --> 00:33:16.260
<v Unidentified speaker>All right, good afternoon, councilors, city administrator, and mayor.

244
00:33:16.758 --> 00:33:21.376
<v Unidentified speaker>I'm Allegro Wilhite, and I'm the executive director of the Tax Supervising and Conservation Commission.

245
00:33:21.730 --> 00:33:24.022
<v Unidentified speaker>You may remember that I get to see you all once a year.

246
00:33:24.214 --> 00:33:29.330
<v Unidentified speaker>We're part of your budget process, as we are for almost all of the taxing districts here in Multnomah County.

247
00:33:29.907 --> 00:33:35.746
<v Unidentified speaker>So Ruth has talked a lot about some very wonky budget things, and I get to talk about even wonkier budget things.

248
00:33:35.938 --> 00:33:38.134
<v Unidentified speaker>So, so excited to be here today for that.

249
00:33:39.080 --> 00:33:46.134
<v Unidentified speaker>City staff had asked if I could come and provide a little bit context on one particular aspect of the TAO that you're hearing about today.

250
00:33:46.983 --> 00:33:57.144
<v Unidentified speaker>The intent for me to be here is just to provide a little bit of insight into the larger perspective of Oregon budget law that we're talking about here and why you're seeing certain proposed changes.

251
00:33:57.752 --> 00:34:05.156
<v Unidentified speaker>So the fall TAO includes moving some budgeted contingency funds to the budget category of reserve for future expenditures.

252
00:34:05.653 --> 00:34:12.385
<v Unidentified speaker>And in Oregon budget law, there is a clear definition and distinguishment between contingency and reserve.

253
00:34:12.449 --> 00:34:12.528
<v Loretta Smith>Yes.

254
00:34:13.204 --> 00:34:22.652
<v Unidentified speaker>Though in practice, some local governments have used the terms pretty interchangeably, and I would say generally speaking, the public and for most folks, it all means the same thing.

255
00:34:23.246 --> 00:34:28.918
<v Unidentified speaker>Oregon budget law is quite explicit about these being different definitions for different flavors of money.

256
00:34:29.175 --> 00:34:49.085
<v Unidentified speaker>So I think, Ruth, you might have a slide that kind of breaks it down, but I'll say from sort of the simplest way to think of it, I think, is that contingency is defined in law as So the example that I use when I'm giving trainings on this is that maybe, you know, you're going to have some kind of weather event every year.

257
00:34:49.632 --> 00:34:52.844
<v Unidentified speaker>You don't know what it's going to be, so you put money in contingency.

258
00:34:52.940 --> 00:35:06.190
<v Unidentified speaker>You know you're going to spend it, but you don't know if it's going to be purchasing materials and services for sandbags because of flooding, or if you might need that money for personnel services to enhance fire services because of wildfire encroachment on the city.

259
00:35:06.239 --> 00:35:06.579
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Smith.

260
00:35:06.925 --> 00:35:07.166
<v Unidentified speaker>Right?

261
00:35:07.278 --> 00:35:10.438
<v Unidentified speaker>You don't know, but you do know you're going to have to be spending something.

262
00:35:10.967 --> 00:35:13.693
<v Unidentified speaker>So those funds go into contingency from budget law.

263
00:35:14.559 --> 00:35:19.306
<v Unidentified speaker>Now, there are other things that we know that we're going to purchase, but it's not going to be in the current year.

264
00:35:19.451 --> 00:35:20.733
<v Unidentified speaker>It's going to be further out.

265
00:35:21.135 --> 00:35:23.012
<v Unidentified speaker>Another example is a fire engine.

266
00:35:23.380 --> 00:35:24.471
<v Unidentified speaker>They're really expensive.

267
00:35:24.648 --> 00:35:27.838
<v Unidentified speaker>We usually have to save for years, right, to buy one of those.

268
00:35:27.951 --> 00:35:31.992
<v Unidentified speaker>So we might know we're going to buy a fire engine in fiscal year 2029.

269
00:35:32.137 --> 00:35:36.387
<v Unidentified speaker>So we need some reserves for that, but we're not planning to purchase it in the current year.

270
00:35:36.451 --> 00:35:36.498
<v Unidentified speaker>Right.

271
00:35:37.494 --> 00:35:39.661
<v Unidentified speaker>So I'm looking up to see what your slides are here.

272
00:35:39.806 --> 00:35:43.788
<v Unidentified speaker>Yes, you've got that not anticipated, which again, I think is kind of that clear thing.

273
00:35:44.798 --> 00:35:59.905
<v Unidentified speaker>Another piece that's important to understand, I think, about the reserve for future expenditures piece is that if that purpose comes up sooner, let's say there's a big sale on fire engines and you can get one for half off this current year, great.

274
00:36:00.114 --> 00:36:06.103
<v Unidentified speaker>You can actually still access your reserve for future expenditures even though it was planned for fiscal year 2029.

275
00:36:06.166 --> 00:36:06.215
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

276
00:36:06.615 --> 00:36:08.333
<v Unidentified speaker>Because it's the same purpose.

277
00:36:08.813 --> 00:36:13.626
<v Unidentified speaker>So that's another way in which it's different from just like fund balance that's sitting there and you can't spend.

278
00:36:13.690 --> 00:36:19.481
<v Unidentified speaker>You can do a supplemental budget if the purpose for that money comes up sooner, if there's another opportunity.

279
00:36:19.721 --> 00:36:22.577
<v Unidentified speaker>So as decision makers, I think that's important for you to know.

280
00:36:23.891 --> 00:36:34.543
<v Unidentified speaker>So in terms of how we got to where we are now, as I mentioned, many local governments would use contingency and reserves somewhat interchangeably and use contingency as an overall savings account.

281
00:36:35.168 --> 00:36:43.844
<v Unidentified speaker>I believe one of the reasons for this is because it wasn't explicitly stated in budget law that you could have a reserve for future expenditure in any fund.

282
00:36:44.260 --> 00:36:48.784
<v Unidentified speaker>It looked like it could only be in reserve funds, and so people kind of ignored it and didn't use it very often.

283
00:36:49.777 --> 00:36:59.945
<v Unidentified speaker>We actually were having conversations with many different districts about this, this very issue this last spring, and so we went to Department of Revenue and said, can we get some clarity on this?

284
00:37:00.266 --> 00:37:05.146
<v Unidentified speaker>And their guidance back to us was, it's not forbidden to use it in other funds, and so you can.

285
00:37:05.916 --> 00:37:18.998
<v Unidentified speaker>So given that, we have updated our training and our guidance to say, let's take advantage of this definition of this tool in our budget handbook to be more transparent and clear about the flavor of this money.

286
00:37:19.143 --> 00:37:30.605
<v Unidentified speaker>And so that's what we're talking about here with reserves versus contingency, is the opportunity to have more transparency about exactly what those funds are committed for and how you're planning on spending them.

287
00:37:30.684 --> 00:37:30.844
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

288
00:37:31.735 --> 00:37:41.365
<v Unidentified speaker>So from a budget law perspective, I do see this change as better aligning with the legal budget law categories as well as providing improved transparency.

289
00:37:44.110 --> 00:37:44.884
<v Unidentified speaker>Great, thank you.

290
00:37:45.820 --> 00:37:47.726
<v Unidentified speaker>I'll let you talk about the specifics.

291
00:37:47.838 --> 00:37:48.226
<v Unidentified speaker>That's the—.

292
00:37:48.322 --> 00:37:49.744
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, the wonky budget law stuff is done.

293
00:37:49.856 --> 00:37:52.601
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, stay for questions on this section.

294
00:37:52.681 --> 00:37:56.085
<v Unidentified speaker>We'll go to questions, Q&A on this section in a few slides.

295
00:37:56.632 --> 00:38:08.317
<v Unidentified speaker>So, um, so yeah, so as Allegra mentioned, um, the fall TAO includes actions to make this shift for a number of different funds.

296
00:38:08.893 --> 00:38:13.307
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, and this slide kind of aligns with what Allegra just laid out.

297
00:38:13.644 --> 00:38:28.552
<v Unidentified speaker>And then at the bottom, it states that the total change that we're recommending based on this guideline, these guidelines, and our review with bureaus of all the different contingencies and reserves citywide the total change is $1.08 billion.

298
00:38:30.858 --> 00:38:42.807
<v Unidentified speaker>So that is $1.08 billion that would shift what is currently budgeted as contingency but would become budgeted as RFE, as reserve for future expenditure, to improve that distinction and transparency.

299
00:38:44.804 --> 00:38:51.329
<v Unidentified speaker>And the next slide has a little bit more of a breakdown of what that looks like across the different funds, but I do want to hit this thank you.

300
00:38:51.378 --> 00:39:00.114
<v Unidentified speaker>I want to make this point clearly because it will be significant because it is still sort of in the budget, but it is not appropriated.

301
00:39:00.563 --> 00:39:11.559
<v Unidentified speaker>And so importantly, when we report out the number of our total budget that is appropriated by City Council every year, it will be lower by $1.08 billion as a result of this change.

302
00:39:12.199 --> 00:39:26.005
<v Unidentified speaker>And so we're actually going to put out a press release about this next week and have it clearly on our website so that So when it's in the press in the spring, we can point back to this explainer and this moment when we said, this is why we're doing this.

303
00:39:26.697 --> 00:39:31.889
<v Unidentified speaker>And it will look funny when we run the year-over-year numbers as a result of this change.

304
00:39:34.253 --> 00:39:44.103
<v Unidentified speaker>But sort of separate aside on what numbers are the most useful to look at when we're talking about total budget, but for this purpose, that is one of the reasons we wanted to do it.

305
00:39:44.152 --> 00:39:44.492
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Smith.

306
00:39:44.606 --> 00:39:45.322
<v Unidentified speaker>To highlight that.

307
00:39:48.146 --> 00:39:55.655
<v Unidentified speaker>This slide, I couldn't list every fund for space, but these are the largest shifts by dollar value.

308
00:39:57.510 --> 00:40:05.150
<v Unidentified speaker>The biggest one is PSEF, and again, this is just because they have a clear 5-year spending plan.

309
00:40:06.550 --> 00:40:12.135
<v Unidentified speaker>And so rather than having the entire amount for that 5-year spending plan that's that's outside the current fiscal year.

310
00:40:12.583 --> 00:40:14.523
<v Unidentified speaker>In contingency, it splits out.

311
00:40:14.586 --> 00:40:27.389
<v Unidentified speaker>It remains— there's a significant amount that remains in true contingency, and there is an amount, about $300 million, that is for future fiscal years that moves to reserve for future expenditure.

312
00:40:27.469 --> 00:40:34.583
<v Unidentified speaker>And as Liger was saying, if for some reason council wanted to make a decision to pull some of that forward, you could still access that money and pull it forward.

313
00:40:34.759 --> 00:40:38.717
<v Unidentified speaker>It's just differentiating between the 2 different purposes of those funds.

314
00:40:38.780 --> 00:40:38.925
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

315
00:40:41.675 --> 00:40:50.407
<v Unidentified speaker>I won't go through each of the others, but, you know, they're some of the biggest funds in the city, so it's kind of no surprise that they have the largest contingencies and the largest shifts.

316
00:40:51.050 --> 00:41:04.798
<v Unidentified speaker>A lot of them also are capital funds that do a lot of capital investment, and so they have these large multi-year projects that, you know, and they have capital replacement needs out in future years.

317
00:41:04.849 --> 00:41:04.965
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

318
00:41:07.099 --> 00:41:15.599
<v Unidentified speaker>This again, all the detail will be provided to back this up, and those 23 other funds that are added together at the bottom will be broken out.

319
00:41:16.963 --> 00:41:22.527
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay, that is the conclusion of the slides for the first section, so we can do Q&A.

320
00:41:22.655 --> 00:41:26.713
<v Unidentified speaker>And maybe if you have questions on the contingencies first, we can do that.

321
00:41:27.163 --> 00:41:27.884
<v Jamie Dunphy>Absolutely.

322
00:41:28.028 --> 00:41:30.963
<v Jamie Dunphy>Colleagues, feel free to jump into the queue if anyone has any questions about this section.

323
00:41:31.690 --> 00:41:33.266
<v Jamie Dunphy>Prioritizing our time around contingencies.

324
00:41:34.927 --> 00:41:39.971
<v Jamie Dunphy>Oh, Councilor Smith, there we go.

325
00:41:44.018 --> 00:41:44.972
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you, Council President.

326
00:41:45.054 --> 00:41:49.068
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you all for, for giving this, um, presentation.

327
00:41:50.315 --> 00:41:59.380
<v Loretta Smith>And in terms of the encumbrances, uh, we had $4.5 million In encumbrances?

328
00:42:00.041 --> 00:42:17.173
<v Loretta Smith>I thought the encumbrances were not outside of the budget, that they were already in the budget with existing money from the previous budget or the existing fiscal year, and that they don't get paid for out of contingency.

329
00:42:17.271 --> 00:42:22.217
<v Loretta Smith>They get paid for out of the money they already have because we thought that they were going to pay the whole thing.

330
00:42:23.900 --> 00:42:24.170
<v Loretta Smith>Yeah.

331
00:42:24.271 --> 00:42:29.920
<v Loretta Smith>If, if our expectation is what budget law says that their expectation is that it's going to be spent in that fiscal year.

332
00:42:30.512 --> 00:42:30.849
<v Loretta Smith>Right.

333
00:42:31.121 --> 00:42:40.304
<v Unidentified speaker>So, um, the encumbrance— I'm going to come back to the specifics behind that $4.6 million in the encumbrance carryovers later, but it is not funded out of contingency.

334
00:42:40.384 --> 00:42:51.231
<v Unidentified speaker>So basically, the, the sort of example scenario is you have a project— say we had a project last year and we were paying bills up until the end of the fiscal year.

335
00:42:52.242 --> 00:42:59.003
<v Unidentified speaker>There may, in some cases, there's a certain amount left over from their budget, and these are general fund bureaus, right?

336
00:42:59.052 --> 00:43:01.751
<v Unidentified speaker>So if we didn't pull it forward, it would fall back into the general fund.

337
00:43:02.201 --> 00:43:10.103
<v Unidentified speaker>There's a certain amount left over from their budget, not from contingency, but from their external materials and services budget at the end of the fiscal year.

338
00:43:10.858 --> 00:43:17.909
<v Unidentified speaker>And they had to keep it open, essentially protect that budget because they might have had bills come due in June.

339
00:43:18.422 --> 00:43:20.972
<v Unidentified speaker>And so that's the scenario where they're pulling the money forward.

340
00:43:21.132 --> 00:43:25.927
<v Unidentified speaker>But it is, it's external materials and services money that would appear as underspending.

341
00:43:26.119 --> 00:43:34.153
<v Unidentified speaker>And then they're saying now this fiscal year, actually, we need that underspending from last year to pay for that project this year.

342
00:43:34.217 --> 00:43:37.474
<v Unidentified speaker>But we'll talk more about the details of that later in this presentation.

343
00:43:37.889 --> 00:43:39.958
<v Loretta Smith>And so that's considered an encumbrance?

344
00:43:41.097 --> 00:43:50.126
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, the encumbrance is the, um, is the sort action within the fiscal year to sort of hang on to the budget for a contract, right?

345
00:43:50.335 --> 00:43:51.329
<v Unidentified speaker>That's the part that's—.

346
00:43:51.456 --> 00:44:03.003
<v Loretta Smith>So for example, I had a— oh, it was a $30 million spend for software and some other fees that were associated with software.

347
00:44:03.869 --> 00:44:07.012
<v Loretta Smith>And I set that aside with my '25-'26 budget.

348
00:44:07.878 --> 00:44:17.550
<v Loretta Smith>And when we were going into this new budget, they said it was going to be This can be encumbered because you started this in this fiscal year.

349
00:44:18.416 --> 00:44:33.735
<v Loretta Smith>So my thought was that, that, that money that I had set aside, that that automatically comes over or set in a different pot that's encumbered, and it has nothing to do with the money that I have for this fiscal year.

350
00:44:34.521 --> 00:44:37.458
<v Loretta Smith>You just take it out of that other pot that we set aside.

351
00:44:37.570 --> 00:44:37.795
<v Loretta Smith>Yes.

352
00:44:38.148 --> 00:44:59.514
<v Loretta Smith>So this is really confusing to me because it sounds like if you've had any, um, if I had any, uh, unused monies, that that money is going to be used instead of the money that I thought was being moved into a separate pot of money that of my encumbered dollars from the current fiscal year.

353
00:45:00.751 --> 00:45:04.315
<v Jonas Biery>Councilor, let me try and see if I can shed some light on it.

354
00:45:05.101 --> 00:45:07.639
<v Jonas Biery>'Cause I think there's kind of 2 different things that are happening.

355
00:45:07.751 --> 00:45:09.099
<v Loretta Smith>There's bureau money and then there's—.

356
00:45:09.099 --> 00:45:10.224
<v Jonas Biery>And they're overlapping, right?

357
00:45:10.304 --> 00:45:14.302
<v Jonas Biery>And so the first is in your example of $30 million.

358
00:45:14.798 --> 00:45:19.809
<v Jonas Biery>$30 million is sort of budgeted, encumbered, expected to be spent in this current fiscal year.

359
00:45:20.418 --> 00:45:26.503
<v Jonas Biery>And we thought we were going to spend $30 million and we only spent $25 because the project didn't get delivered by June.

360
00:45:26.920 --> 00:45:32.090
<v Jonas Biery>So there's $5 million left unspent that we want to continue into the next budget.

361
00:45:32.137 --> 00:45:34.416
<v Jonas Biery>So it's the same kind of dollar.

362
00:45:34.543 --> 00:45:36.356
<v Jonas Biery>We're not having it come from a different pot.

363
00:45:36.469 --> 00:45:40.510
<v Jonas Biery>We're saying we had this $5 million remaining that we didn't spend.

364
00:45:40.559 --> 00:45:41.875
<v Jonas Biery>We know we need to spend it next year.

365
00:45:42.324 --> 00:45:45.420
<v Jonas Biery>Let's take that encumbrance and carry it over to the next year.

366
00:45:46.269 --> 00:45:46.510
<v Jonas Biery>Okay.

367
00:45:47.056 --> 00:45:58.909
<v Jonas Biery>Separately and simultaneously, we're making adjustments to total fund balance, which lead— the hypothetical example that Ruth gave— that leads to potential changes in contingency.

368
00:46:00.802 --> 00:46:05.965
<v Jonas Biery>So I think there's two— if I'm understanding the question, there's sort of two things happening simultaneously.

369
00:46:06.061 --> 00:46:17.864
<v Jonas Biery>One is the encumbrance carryovers, which again we're going to talk about in a little more detail and separately, but simultaneously the math around the change in contingency and fund balance.

370
00:46:19.211 --> 00:46:30.230
<v Jonas Biery>So another way to think of it is if we had in that example, that $30 million example, if we said We do need to carry some money over, but we only need to carry $4 million.

371
00:46:30.230 --> 00:46:31.690
<v Jonas Biery>We don't need the full $30 million.

372
00:46:31.690 --> 00:46:33.579
<v Jonas Biery>Now we only need to spend $29 million.

373
00:46:34.070 --> 00:46:37.929
<v Jonas Biery>So we're not going to carry— we're not going to do an encumbrance carryover of $5 million.

374
00:46:37.929 --> 00:46:40.949
<v Jonas Biery>We're only going to do an encumbrance carryover of $4 million.

375
00:46:41.230 --> 00:46:47.710
<v Jonas Biery>And that's some of the analysis that we've really done more deeply is to make sure that those encumbrance carryovers are accurate and needed.

376
00:46:47.710 --> 00:46:50.769
<v Jonas Biery>In that example, there's $1 million left, right?

377
00:46:50.769 --> 00:46:52.469
<v Jonas Biery>So that $1 million in theory—.

378
00:46:52.469 --> 00:46:52.550
<v Jonas Biery>That's not true.

379
00:46:52.813 --> 00:46:58.385
<v Jonas Biery>Would move to fund balance and become a consideration for the future year.

380
00:46:58.514 --> 00:46:59.835
<v Loretta Smith>Right, right.

381
00:47:01.559 --> 00:47:01.771
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

382
00:47:03.298 --> 00:47:03.851
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor.

383
00:47:04.193 --> 00:47:04.989
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Smith.

384
00:47:05.072 --> 00:47:05.737
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.

385
00:47:06.306 --> 00:47:07.478
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Council President.

386
00:47:09.235 --> 00:47:13.108
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I appreciate this overview of what's changing between contingency and reserves.

387
00:47:13.302 --> 00:47:22.612
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I just want to make sure that I understand what I think were more straightforward pieces of contingency and reserves and whether they staying in their current categories or not.

388
00:47:24.576 --> 00:47:31.557
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So money put aside for cost overruns on a construction project, that continues to be contingency?

389
00:47:33.320 --> 00:47:44.976
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, I think by and large, unless it was set aside for— unless you wouldn't— you're not going to know about it until 3 years out and you're waiting until that 3 years out time to assess whether you need it.

390
00:47:45.041 --> 00:47:48.260
<v Unidentified speaker>But yeah, I think generally, like We're doing a construction project right now.

391
00:47:48.371 --> 00:47:52.161
<v Unidentified speaker>We don't know exactly how much it's going to cost, so we've got a little extra in case it goes over.

392
00:47:52.385 --> 00:47:53.414
<v Unidentified speaker>That would stay in contingency.

393
00:47:53.686 --> 00:48:03.690
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, and then I'm gonna use a very imprecise term, but I'll say true what-if contingency.

394
00:48:03.737 --> 00:48:18.302
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So the BLT fund that's set aside, the percentage of our budget that through our budget policies we set aside Every year, those what we have called contingencies in the past, are those still contingencies?

395
00:48:18.798 --> 00:48:41.061
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, the only real shift of those sort of regular kind of general fund contingencies is we've had a confusingly labeled commitment item called major maintenance reserves, and that that would in many cases shift to a later year.

396
00:48:41.126 --> 00:48:53.079
<v Unidentified speaker>So if you're building a new structure and you know it's going to need maintenance at some point in the future, and you're saving for that future maintenance on this new building, you would put that into RFE.

397
00:48:53.704 --> 00:49:00.786
<v Unidentified speaker>And some of that type of contingency— some of that type of funding was held in contingency previously, and we've shifted some of it.

398
00:49:01.570 --> 00:49:05.929
<v Unidentified speaker>Some of it, again, to your point, it might be needed this year, and so we've left that part in contingency.

399
00:49:06.427 --> 00:49:35.697
<v Jonas Biery>And if I may, I would just add the sum of it is actually kind of important because the work that's been done, I don't want to lose sight of the fact that CBO team and dozens of others have put in many, many hours to do that analysis that we frankly haven't really done meaningfully in the past to identify what the sum of it is and why so that we can be intentional and direct and ultimately transparent to the public and to you about why something is in a contingency.

400
00:49:35.795 --> 00:49:36.018
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you.

401
00:49:36.387 --> 00:49:38.664
<v Jonas Biery>Expected to be spent this year versus why is it not.

402
00:49:39.177 --> 00:49:47.561
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And that's work I assume that your team, Ruth, is doing with our bureaus and part of that work to have a more centralized understanding of our budgeting within your office.

403
00:49:48.059 --> 00:49:50.815
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, we've sort of coordinated that work.

404
00:49:50.864 --> 00:49:51.873
<v Unidentified speaker>We've gathered all the data.

405
00:49:51.922 --> 00:49:54.262
<v Unidentified speaker>We will share it with you later this week.

406
00:49:54.871 --> 00:50:07.914
<v Unidentified speaker>And I think in the future, we're also looking at ways— this goes to the later part of the conversation— in the budget book to kind of have more explanation of what different contingencies and reserves are for.

407
00:50:08.123 --> 00:50:24.436
<v Unidentified speaker>That's been pretty scant in the past, and so hoping to institute that so it's transparent, you know, as you all are reading through and saying, oh, okay, this fund has a contingency for this much and an RFE of this much, you know, do we want to pull some of the RFE forward?

408
00:50:24.501 --> 00:50:26.523
<v Unidentified speaker>Is this contingency the right size, et cetera?

409
00:50:26.588 --> 00:50:27.327
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay.

410
00:50:27.936 --> 00:50:48.335
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Should we expect one of the outcomes of this change to be that we see fewer instances of dollars being carried over multiple years in a row as they remain in a fund unspent because they're being moved from contingency to that longer-range reserve, which is outside of that normal budgeting process?

411
00:50:48.672 --> 00:50:51.737
<v Unidentified speaker>So I— interestingly, I don't think that will be the result.

412
00:50:51.786 --> 00:50:56.780
<v Unidentified speaker>It seems like it should be, but it will still fall to fund balance and be reappropriated.

413
00:50:56.860 --> 00:51:00.346
<v Unidentified speaker>It just— you would expect, you know, oops, sorry.

414
00:51:00.764 --> 00:51:08.346
<v Unidentified speaker>If PSEF has a $300 million RFE number, we expect, you know, if council doesn't change it, that's still going to be there.

415
00:51:08.425 --> 00:51:14.304
<v Unidentified speaker>It will fall to balance at the end of the fiscal year in PSEF, and they'll pick it up in the fall and rebudget it as RFE.

416
00:51:14.657 --> 00:51:14.835
<v Angelita Morillo>Got it.

417
00:51:14.980 --> 00:51:18.255
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So we will still go through that technical process.

418
00:51:19.315 --> 00:51:20.679
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But it will be within the new category.

419
00:51:21.097 --> 00:51:27.083
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Council President, can I ask a question on an unrelated slide that we have been through, or do you want this to just be about contingencies and reserves?

420
00:51:27.420 --> 00:51:28.239
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Anything we've seen so far.

421
00:51:28.480 --> 00:51:39.505
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, on the major non-general fund balance adjustments, there were the 2 largest funds there say that they were because of a bond issuance delay.

422
00:51:40.179 --> 00:51:48.056
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is that because of a delay in the work or because of an issue with the bond issuance or because of changes in the markets that you're expecting in the future?

423
00:51:48.519 --> 00:51:53.824
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And when should we expect to see those bonds sold, and does that have any effect on the timeline for the projects?

424
00:51:53.969 --> 00:51:55.715
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, no, those are good questions all.

425
00:51:56.132 --> 00:52:02.286
<v Jonas Biery>Um, so I think in the case of the water bonds, um, it has— they have in fact now been issued.

426
00:52:02.702 --> 00:52:07.878
<v Jonas Biery>Uh, it was just a matter of not falling within the fiscal year end the way we thought they would.

427
00:52:08.472 --> 00:52:20.141
<v Jonas Biery>Um, and I'll just note that's, that's actually having that kind of a fund balance adjustment and a delay is not uncommon 'cause sometimes we don't exactly know what the timeline is to do that issuance.

428
00:52:20.188 --> 00:52:25.215
<v Jonas Biery>So we have to budget it in the earliest year we think it might happen so that we have that appropriation.

429
00:52:26.387 --> 00:52:30.434
<v Jonas Biery>It's way more often that it gets delayed than it gets accelerated.

430
00:52:30.481 --> 00:52:34.465
<v Jonas Biery>And so that often means we do have to sort of delay that issuance and it falls into the next fiscal year.

431
00:52:34.512 --> 00:52:46.070
<v Jonas Biery>So that's just an indicative of needing to do the planning ahead so we have the earliest possible budget authority but ultimately we issue it at a timeline that matches the project and repayment capacity.

432
00:52:46.135 --> 00:52:55.568
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But we shouldn't worry that there are project delays or that we are playing the market in such a way that it wasn't a good time to sell the bonds?

433
00:52:56.547 --> 00:52:57.237
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, correct.

434
00:52:57.284 --> 00:53:01.199
<v Jonas Biery>I mean, these are not— the bond delay is not indicative necessarily of a project delay.

435
00:53:01.456 --> 00:53:01.728
<v Jonas Biery>It can.

436
00:53:01.858 --> 00:53:04.826
<v Jonas Biery>If the project is delayed, we certainly would also delay the bond issue.

437
00:53:05.628 --> 00:53:10.346
<v Jonas Biery>And then just for transparency, uh, we don't, we don't play the market in that way.

438
00:53:10.586 --> 00:53:15.257
<v Jonas Biery>Um, I mean, we certainly wouldn't issue if we knew it was a very, very volatile, difficult market.

439
00:53:15.722 --> 00:53:23.121
<v Jonas Biery>Um, but we typically issue bonds when we, um, when we need the money and don't, and don't try to, um, be, be tricky about timing the market in that way.

440
00:53:23.425 --> 00:53:23.778
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

441
00:53:24.710 --> 00:53:24.965
<v Mitch Green>Thank you.

442
00:53:25.431 --> 00:53:26.329
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.

443
00:53:26.411 --> 00:53:26.940
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Green.

444
00:53:27.934 --> 00:53:28.255
<v Mitch Green>Thank you.

445
00:53:28.481 --> 00:53:30.791
<v Mitch Green>Um, thanks for the presentation.

446
00:53:30.887 --> 00:53:32.686
<v Mitch Green>I, I, I really like it so far.

447
00:53:32.829 --> 00:53:36.916
<v Mitch Green>I think it's I think we're improving, especially the encumbrance carryover piece.

448
00:53:37.077 --> 00:53:39.989
<v Mitch Green>I feel like just like you guys listened and we're doing the work.

449
00:53:41.440 --> 00:53:43.922
<v Mitch Green>One specific question, just trying to track the numbers here.

450
00:53:44.840 --> 00:53:47.322
<v Mitch Green>The general fund returns all make sense.

451
00:53:47.371 --> 00:53:49.853
<v Mitch Green>It's $16.5 million-ish, somewhere around there.

452
00:53:51.552 --> 00:53:55.157
<v Mitch Green>How is it different from the ending balance?

453
00:53:55.675 --> 00:53:59.699
<v Mitch Green>I know we're going to get that into a later slide, but there's about a $2 million delta that I can't square in my head.

454
00:54:00.036 --> 00:54:00.902
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, great question.

455
00:54:01.655 --> 00:54:03.257
<v Unidentified speaker>There are 2 reasons it's different.

456
00:54:03.402 --> 00:54:07.840
<v Unidentified speaker>The first is that I'm counting the spring returns on this slide.

457
00:54:08.289 --> 00:54:16.204
<v Unidentified speaker>Some of that money actually got spent last year, and so it didn't appear in the ending fund balance because we needed it to get through the fiscal year.

458
00:54:16.251 --> 00:54:17.550
<v Unidentified speaker>So that's reason number one.

459
00:54:17.998 --> 00:54:20.577
<v Unidentified speaker>Reason number 2 is this is just the expenditure side.

460
00:54:20.626 --> 00:54:27.034
<v Unidentified speaker>It doesn't show the revenue portion, and our general fund discretionary revenues came in about $2 million under budget.

461
00:54:28.492 --> 00:54:29.650
<v Unidentified speaker>Once all was said and done.

462
00:54:29.795 --> 00:54:31.338
<v Unidentified speaker>So there's an adjustment there.

463
00:54:31.530 --> 00:54:35.146
<v Unidentified speaker>Like the fund balance adds together the change in expenditure and the change in revenue.

464
00:54:35.467 --> 00:54:38.155
<v Unidentified speaker>And so this is just isolating the return.

465
00:54:38.219 --> 00:54:41.864
<v Unidentified speaker>So it's just slightly different things, but it's close to the same number.

466
00:54:43.000 --> 00:54:43.771
<v Mitch Green>Okay, that's good enough for me.

467
00:54:43.914 --> 00:54:44.155
<v Mitch Green>Thanks.

468
00:54:46.068 --> 00:54:47.208
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you very much, Councilor Green.

469
00:54:47.289 --> 00:54:47.980
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Zimmerman.

470
00:54:48.960 --> 00:54:49.168
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thanks.

471
00:54:49.217 --> 00:54:55.420
<v Eric Zimmerman>So looking at what was moving from contingency to the reserves, can you talk a little bit about who makes that decision?

472
00:54:57.829 --> 00:55:00.695
<v Unidentified speaker>Ultimately, council has to decide.

473
00:55:00.775 --> 00:55:03.690
<v Unidentified speaker>It's a budget action to move from contingency to reserves.

474
00:55:03.739 --> 00:55:06.219
<v Unidentified speaker>And again, we're going to provide the full details on this.

475
00:55:06.556 --> 00:55:06.960
<v Unidentified speaker>This was—.

476
00:55:06.960 --> 00:55:07.362
<v Raymond C. Lee>In the TAO?

477
00:55:07.525 --> 00:55:07.621
<v Angelita Morillo>Yeah.

478
00:55:07.686 --> 00:55:08.690
<v Unidentified speaker>Is that when you're going to provide it?

479
00:55:08.737 --> 00:55:09.789
<v Unidentified speaker>Like the end of this week.

480
00:55:10.436 --> 00:55:14.353
<v Unidentified speaker>The spreadsheet has every line, like within a given fund, right?

481
00:55:14.400 --> 00:55:19.431
<v Unidentified speaker>Within the transportation fund, there's multiple lines of contingency with different actions happening.

482
00:55:20.126 --> 00:55:24.538
<v Unidentified speaker>And so that has all the details and you can kind of assess and ask questions.

483
00:55:24.635 --> 00:55:29.963
<v Unidentified speaker>And if there's some that seem wrong to you or you don't understand it, feel free to reach out.

484
00:55:30.996 --> 00:55:42.190
<v Unidentified speaker>This was our joint sort of recommendation with the bureaus and the fund managers for each of the funds, along with our review and OIGRA's guidance on the budget law.

485
00:55:42.416 --> 00:55:47.762
<v Eric Zimmerman>Okay, so right now these are recommendations from the staff.

486
00:55:48.244 --> 00:55:56.967
<v Eric Zimmerman>Can we go back a few slides to, um, it was— I think it was the, the ending fund.

487
00:55:57.032 --> 00:56:01.818
<v Eric Zimmerman>There's another slide that showed some complete numbers, um, earlier in the presentation that I was hoping to ask about.

488
00:56:03.376 --> 00:56:04.806
<v Eric Zimmerman>Uh, keep going.

489
00:56:04.920 --> 00:56:05.240
<v Raymond C. Lee>Right here.

490
00:56:05.402 --> 00:56:05.692
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That one.

491
00:56:06.592 --> 00:56:17.474
<v Eric Zimmerman>All right, so we adopted a $600 million PISA fund and It's going to be $154 more million than we adopted just some 90 days ago?

492
00:56:19.103 --> 00:56:19.717
<v Unidentified speaker>Correct.

493
00:56:20.072 --> 00:56:20.135
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay.

494
00:56:20.184 --> 00:56:20.231
<v Raymond C. Lee>Yeah.

495
00:56:20.858 --> 00:56:24.378
<v Eric Zimmerman>And out of that, it's very preschool for all of us.

496
00:56:24.925 --> 00:56:39.085
<v Eric Zimmerman>So our $750 million that's sitting in the bank account, $750 million that's sitting in the bank account, only $300 million of that will be in reserve based on the previous slide we just looked at.

497
00:56:40.244 --> 00:56:46.742
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so based on the use of contingency, I'd like to reiterate, you mentioned earlier contingency.

498
00:56:46.822 --> 00:56:49.610
<v Eric Zimmerman>And Allegro, remind us, how long did you spend at Multnomah County?

499
00:56:50.512 --> 00:56:53.557
<v Unidentified speaker>I was at Multnomah County for about 3 and a half years.

500
00:56:54.119 --> 00:56:54.893
<v Eric Zimmerman>They were great years for us.

501
00:56:54.942 --> 00:56:55.748
<v Unidentified speaker>Being your budget analyst.

502
00:56:55.844 --> 00:56:57.085
<v Jonas Biery>We appreciated your service there.

503
00:56:57.860 --> 00:57:01.777
<v Eric Zimmerman>But the point that Allegro is making is contingency is supposed to be used in the year of.

504
00:57:03.552 --> 00:57:15.695
<v Eric Zimmerman>Okay, I want to make sure that but if that's the case, just please clarify that we are then putting out— what's— we're putting out $400-some-odd million this year in PSF.

505
00:57:15.791 --> 00:57:16.579
<v Eric Zimmerman>Is that accurate?

506
00:57:17.335 --> 00:57:18.123
<v Unidentified speaker>So my guess—.

507
00:57:18.123 --> 00:57:19.331
<v Eric Zimmerman>It's going to go into the community.

508
00:57:22.186 --> 00:57:23.543
<v Unidentified speaker>We'll get back to you on the details.

509
00:57:24.367 --> 00:57:32.230
<v Unidentified speaker>I think what is happening is that in the outgoing grants, they encumber a full amount for multiple years.

510
00:57:32.666 --> 00:57:35.429
<v Unidentified speaker>Now, that's a decision that could be changed.

511
00:57:35.735 --> 00:57:52.447
<v Unidentified speaker>I think, and we will get back to you on the details, that they— that the $310 million that's on this later slide assumes they're encumbering multiple years of outgoing grants in one year, which means you have to have the budget in that year to support that multi-year encumbrance.

512
00:57:52.833 --> 00:57:57.958
<v Unidentified speaker>The alternative would be to encumber only the one fiscal year at a time and then re-encumber it the next year.

513
00:57:58.007 --> 00:57:58.054
<v Loretta Smith>Okay.

514
00:57:58.829 --> 00:58:12.170
<v Eric Zimmerman>Do you know, is that programming based upon the money that was in the bank in the first few years where we grew a lot more than we thought, or is it based on the amount of revenue that's coming in each year?

515
00:58:12.260 --> 00:58:17.820
<v Eric Zimmerman>Now, I can understand, and I actually think it's a good practice to say, hey, we want to contract you for more than 1 year.

516
00:58:17.820 --> 00:58:19.420
<v Eric Zimmerman>That makes a ton of sense to me.

517
00:58:19.420 --> 00:58:25.019
<v Eric Zimmerman>And it's going to be a $1 million program every year for the next 5, and you don't have to reapply until 5.

518
00:58:25.019 --> 00:58:25.619
<v Eric Zimmerman>I get that.

519
00:58:25.619 --> 00:58:25.739
<v Sameer Kanal>But it's not based on revenue.

520
00:58:26.684 --> 00:58:36.219
<v Eric Zimmerman>But this is a large enough amount of money that it seems like we're— we have encumbered funds that are not part of our yearly revenue.

521
00:58:36.284 --> 00:58:39.992
<v Eric Zimmerman>We've encumbered some one-time that we don't expect that we're going to bring back.

522
00:58:40.556 --> 00:58:42.329
<v Eric Zimmerman>Am I— that's somewhat accurate there?

523
00:58:42.556 --> 00:58:53.436
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, so right, if they're earning roughly $200 million a year, it's not exactly right, but if that were true, there may be more encumbrances than the total annual revenue.

524
00:58:54.110 --> 00:59:01.467
<v Unidentified speaker>So it actually requires kind of, in a budgetary sense, relying on some of that fund balance to support those multi-year encumbrances.

525
00:59:01.902 --> 00:59:02.128
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

526
00:59:02.545 --> 00:59:02.594
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah.

527
00:59:02.643 --> 00:59:17.286
<v Eric Zimmerman>So if we are bringing in about $200 million a year from that, and the change in fund balance is $154 million from when we adopted the budget 90 days ago, what did we account for 90 days ago in terms of the revenue in this?

528
00:59:17.494 --> 00:59:23.335
<v Eric Zimmerman>And does $154 represent on top of the $200, or what does $154 represent?

529
00:59:25.610 --> 00:59:30.818
<v Unidentified speaker>I don't think it is an increase in— I don't think it is revenue coming in above forecast.

530
00:59:31.126 --> 00:59:31.288
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

531
00:59:31.514 --> 00:59:36.190
<v Unidentified speaker>But we can get you the full breakdown of the $154 million.

532
00:59:36.288 --> 00:59:36.659
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thanks.

533
00:59:37.987 --> 00:59:47.777
<v Eric Zimmerman>I wanted— the reason I'm bringing this up is, right, you know, it was right when we got to office, several of you tried to catch the hair on my head on fire, and you were unsuccessful for several reasons.

534
00:59:48.233 --> 00:59:53.561
<v Eric Zimmerman>But it was, why do we have a $500 million contingency fund for things that are not going to be used this year.

535
00:59:53.914 --> 01:00:00.016
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so this put me on a very quick path, which was the City of Portland uses these words incorrectly.

536
01:00:00.081 --> 01:00:14.018
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so thank you, Allegra, for highlighting that from kind of an outside perspective, because coming from 3 other governments, this was a very confusing first couple of budgets given how we use and don't use reserves and contingencies.

537
01:00:14.065 --> 01:00:18.960
<v Eric Zimmerman>So I just want to give credit to aligning.

538
01:00:19.219 --> 01:00:22.123
<v Eric Zimmerman>This is important work and all these bureaus have been doing it differently.

539
01:00:22.706 --> 01:00:32.586
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I recognize the challenge from the central office to get 26 disparate organizations at times to align.

540
01:00:32.635 --> 01:00:40.878
<v Eric Zimmerman>So thank you for that because we were, for the first 2 years of this new council's budget, we were using various words and descriptions.

541
01:00:41.894 --> 01:00:46.161
<v Eric Zimmerman>And policy different from each bureau, right?

542
01:00:46.226 --> 01:00:53.985
<v Eric Zimmerman>And that really did not make for good decision-making because it had to do with who was the last person to give you the definition book, and that's not great.

543
01:00:54.324 --> 01:01:21.364
<v Eric Zimmerman>So I appreciate this work and will note, I'll get into more details with each of these programs and who set the number and set the goal, but this is the first step, colleagues, to saying we want a reserve that represents this ability to do this thing or this size of our ongoing to be able to react to a thing in the catastrophic moment, and then also what we think is the amount you should have in the savings for that year.

544
01:01:21.445 --> 01:01:32.791
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think that's the area where our policy discussions can get really robust and frankly make some of the arguments that happen during budget season a little less live-wired because they're rooted in just basic policies of good governance.

545
01:01:32.840 --> 01:01:36.750
<v Eric Zimmerman>So like, This is important work, and so thank you for that.

546
01:01:37.202 --> 01:01:42.690
<v Eric Zimmerman>It's been challenging to see, but I think it will make us better decision makers in the out years.

547
01:01:42.739 --> 01:01:43.521
<v Eric Zimmerman>So appreciate it.

548
01:01:43.601 --> 01:01:44.431
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you, Council President.

549
01:01:45.001 --> 01:01:46.043
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you very much, Councilor Zimmerman.

550
01:01:46.739 --> 01:01:48.155
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay, no one else in the queue.

551
01:01:48.237 --> 01:01:49.364
<v Jamie Dunphy>Let's move on to section 2.

552
01:01:50.990 --> 01:01:51.458
<v Loretta Smith>Great.

553
01:01:51.715 --> 01:01:53.132
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you.

554
01:01:53.550 --> 01:01:54.614
<v Unidentified speaker>All right.

555
01:01:55.822 --> 01:01:56.963
<v Unidentified speaker>All right.

556
01:01:57.027 --> 01:02:02.996
<v Unidentified speaker>The next section of this presentation is focused on other than fund balance and contingencies, the actions that you're gonna see in the fall TAO.

557
01:02:03.043 --> 01:02:06.806
<v Unidentified speaker>And there's a couple of different subsections.

558
01:02:07.244 --> 01:02:13.929
<v Unidentified speaker>The first subsection is about sort of realignments and net-zero changes, so things that don't sort of draw resources.

559
01:02:17.730 --> 01:02:20.963
<v Unidentified speaker>So the first— whoops, sorry.

560
01:02:22.385 --> 01:02:31.387
<v Unidentified speaker>The first piece of this is the sort of follow-up to the core services realignment work that happened in the adopted budget process yes.

561
01:02:31.516 --> 01:02:32.670
<v Unidentified speaker>For this fiscal year.

562
01:02:33.632 --> 01:02:46.172
<v Unidentified speaker>So the core services realignment was discussed with the goal of reducing duplication, creating more consistent citywide service model, and better aligning responsibility and accountability for core services.

563
01:02:46.829 --> 01:02:52.875
<v Unidentified speaker>The adopted budget made the primary organizational and position changes that were effective July 1st.

564
01:02:53.420 --> 01:03:04.639
<v Unidentified speaker>The implementation has been sort of phased so that we can maintain service continuity support employees through this transition and work through the operational details of bringing these functions together.

565
01:03:05.297 --> 01:03:18.885
<v Unidentified speaker>And so what you're going to see in the fall TAO is the kind of technical budget alignment that we sort of knew would be required at some level as we do this implementation process for core services realignment.

566
01:03:20.155 --> 01:03:27.369
<v Unidentified speaker>And so the adjustments that are included move position funding and the associated materials and services thank you.

567
01:03:27.449 --> 01:03:36.193
<v Unidentified speaker>And then we also moved the materials and services costs— sorry, move the materials and services costs with the position funding to better align the budgets to where the responsibility now sits.

568
01:03:37.409 --> 01:03:47.648
<v Unidentified speaker>This was sort of a piece that was technically difficult in the adopted budget process, and so we came back and did that in this portion.

569
01:03:54.295 --> 01:03:55.836
<v Unidentified speaker>Embedded service model.

570
01:03:56.704 --> 01:04:06.039
<v Unidentified speaker>We need to make sure those resources sit in the correct places so that people can accurately monitor their budgets and the like in the current fiscal year.

571
01:04:07.532 --> 01:04:12.096
<v Unidentified speaker>These adjustments don't represent new programming or expansion of services.

572
01:04:12.931 --> 01:04:22.231
<v Unidentified speaker>They're budget changes that are needed to implement the organizational decisions that were essentially made and included in the budget process.

573
01:04:22.896 --> 01:04:37.668
<v Unidentified speaker>We expect some additional refinement to occur in the '27-'28 budget process, particularly around where the funding sits and the complex funding relationships that kind of still need— some of which still need to be resolved.

574
01:04:40.125 --> 01:04:44.784
<v Unidentified speaker>The priority for this year is to make the transition thoughtfully while maintaining services.

575
01:04:45.318 --> 01:04:56.862
<v Unidentified speaker>So the broader objective has not changed: more consistent, accountable, citywide model for core services with clearer ownership, better transparency, and the resources aligned with the responsibility.

576
01:04:57.679 --> 01:05:03.896
<v Unidentified speaker>And DCA Warren is here and available for questions on this section.

577
01:05:04.971 --> 01:05:28.902
<v Unidentified speaker>And the other thing just to note about these changes that's a little bit more technical is in the Um, TAO itself, there is a directive for reflecting certain changes that are included in the TAO in CAL, in our process to set the budgets for next— the base budgets for next fiscal year.

578
01:05:29.447 --> 01:05:39.643
<v Unidentified speaker>So there is a net increase in the general fund of $121,000 as a result of these changes that would be carried forward into next fiscal year.

579
01:05:39.690 --> 01:05:39.786
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

580
01:05:41.411 --> 01:05:57.565
<v Unidentified speaker>A lot of, as you can kind of see on these slot— in the slide here, some of this, some of that has to do with changing the funding for positions that are— were part of core services realignment.

581
01:05:57.614 --> 01:06:06.371
<v Unidentified speaker>So if positions were in, say, Public Works and now they're in general fund overhead, that results in a hit to the general fund.

582
01:06:06.418 --> 01:06:11.887
<v Unidentified speaker>It's not that there's So it's not more positions or more cost happening.

583
01:06:11.985 --> 01:06:13.666
<v Unidentified speaker>It's a shift in how they're being paid for.

584
01:06:16.340 --> 01:06:16.452
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

585
01:06:16.532 --> 01:06:24.119
<v Unidentified speaker>And then outside of core services realignment, the fall TAO includes 2 sort of realignments of staff within service areas.

586
01:06:24.570 --> 01:06:30.909
<v Unidentified speaker>And these mainly include staff that work on budget and finance type functions within these service areas.

587
01:06:31.527 --> 01:06:37.351
<v Unidentified speaker>Those staff were not included in the core services realignment yes.

588
01:06:38.255 --> 01:06:44.025
<v Unidentified speaker>And they are specific to Community and Economic Development Service Area and the Public Works Service Area.

589
01:06:44.650 --> 01:06:55.351
<v Unidentified speaker>I'll note that for both Public Safety and City Operations, they already have kind of cohesive enterprise services teams.

590
01:06:55.447 --> 01:07:10.393
<v Unidentified speaker>And so the other 2 service areas are moving to reflect how the and so these changes don't change the number of FTE or significantly change the work they're doing.

591
01:07:10.458 --> 01:07:12.833
<v Unidentified speaker>They just pull them into a service area team.

592
01:07:13.490 --> 01:07:25.106
<v Unidentified speaker>The goals are somewhat similar to improve service delivery and provide more consistent practices, sort of pool resources for some bureaus that are smaller, don't have to do very much of a given thing.

593
01:07:25.233 --> 01:07:25.987
<v Unidentified speaker>So it's efficiencies there.

594
01:07:26.101 --> 01:07:26.309
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

595
01:07:26.438 --> 01:07:35.518
<v Unidentified speaker>Of scale to do certain actions like that, and then cross-train staff on those different types of budget and finance things.

596
01:07:37.949 --> 01:07:38.061
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

597
01:07:38.481 --> 01:07:43.614
<v Unidentified speaker>So that's the other kind of major— those are the other major realignments that you'll see in the ordinance.

598
01:07:45.726 --> 01:07:49.045
<v Unidentified speaker>Outside of the general fund, I just wanted to highlight a few things.

599
01:07:51.170 --> 01:07:51.726
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>BES.

600
01:07:52.336 --> 01:07:57.585
<v Unidentified speaker>Has, uh, some draws on contingency of $13.5 million.

601
01:07:58.050 --> 01:08:06.043
<v Unidentified speaker>These are to fund sort of urgent and unforeseen costs, some of which relate to the Lake Oswego, um, uh, treatment facility.

602
01:08:06.940 --> 01:08:10.007
<v Unidentified speaker>The next is in the co-op program.

603
01:08:10.231 --> 01:08:21.788
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, this would draw $350,000 of what is now— what would now be classified as reserved for future expenditure forward to use in the current fiscal year.

604
01:08:23.603 --> 01:08:34.085
<v Unidentified speaker>The third is the PPA Health Fund had higher— experienced higher claims costs than projected, and so this would draw down $1.5 million of the contingency in that fund.

605
01:08:34.567 --> 01:08:53.506
<v Unidentified speaker>And then in Parks, there are multiple draws on Parks Levy contingency for a few different costs in the current fiscal year, including some pool repairs, graffiti removal, Programming support, small programming support in a few places, and some maintenance costs there.

606
01:08:55.617 --> 01:09:03.002
<v Unidentified speaker>And again, there are complete details for all decision packages in the fall TAO are in exhibit 5 when you look at that.

607
01:09:05.769 --> 01:09:07.768
<v Jonas Biery>Okay.

608
01:09:08.010 --> 01:09:08.188
<v Jonas Biery>All right.

609
01:09:08.235 --> 01:09:09.025
<v Jonas Biery>So back to Jonas.

610
01:09:09.220 --> 01:09:10.235
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, thanks, Ruth.

611
01:09:10.283 --> 01:09:16.774
<v Jonas Biery>So the next kind of category is talking about the business license tax stabilization reserve.

612
01:09:16.838 --> 01:09:26.563
<v Jonas Biery>I'm realizing that We should probably just acknowledge that every single time you see or hear from me over the next year, you'll probably hear the word stabilization.

613
01:09:26.996 --> 01:09:28.792
<v Jonas Biery>And so I'm leaning into that here again.

614
01:09:30.045 --> 01:09:38.823
<v Jonas Biery>So the fiscal '26-'27 budget, adopted budget included an initial allocation.

615
01:09:38.872 --> 01:09:42.885
<v Jonas Biery>It ended up at $3.5 million towards this new reserve concept.

616
01:09:43.606 --> 01:09:48.309
<v Jonas Biery>That $3.5 million was around 1.6% of total BLT revenues.

617
01:09:48.998 --> 01:09:55.884
<v Jonas Biery>Significantly lower than the 15% target that was indicated in the budget note.

618
01:09:56.671 --> 01:10:02.865
<v Jonas Biery>That budget note also directed development of a policy to more formally guide creation of the reserve.

619
01:10:03.363 --> 01:10:08.692
<v Jonas Biery>So we're now bringing that forward in an ordinance that will come alongside the TAO to create that policy.

620
01:10:09.189 --> 01:10:14.244
<v Jonas Biery>And then we do expect to transfer a small amount via the TAO, and we'll talk about that in a minute as well.

621
01:10:14.292 --> 01:10:14.469
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you.

622
01:10:15.786 --> 01:10:22.627
<v Jonas Biery>But we wanted to sort of provide some space to talk about what does the policy, this new policy, actually do.

623
01:10:22.853 --> 01:10:27.929
<v Jonas Biery>And I wanted to back up a little bit and just remind everyone about BLT, business license tax.

624
01:10:28.796 --> 01:10:40.569
<v Jonas Biery>So while many locally based companies do also pay the business license tax, the vast majority of that revenue collection is driven by the net income of large national and multinational corporations.

625
01:10:40.921 --> 01:10:50.429
<v Jonas Biery>And therefore are typically highly sensitive to national economic cycles, to taxpayer behavior, to financial market conditions, and federal tax policy changes.

626
01:10:51.166 --> 01:11:10.356
<v Jonas Biery>And because of that kind of volatility, it has historically been true on occasion that revenues can decline by as much as 15 to 20% in a fiscal— in a single fiscal year as a result of economic downturns, as a result of federal tax policy changes, as we've experienced over the last couple budget cycles.

627
01:11:10.453 --> 01:11:10.628
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you.

628
01:11:11.234 --> 01:11:13.649
<v Jonas Biery>Or other events that may be outside the city's control.

629
01:11:15.250 --> 01:11:26.305
<v Jonas Biery>For context, in fiscal '26-'27, BLT revenues are projected at approximately $220 million, which is nearly 30% of the total general fund discretionary revenue.

630
01:11:26.354 --> 01:11:31.283
<v Jonas Biery>So a very important source to fund general fund expenses.

631
01:11:33.101 --> 01:11:51.747
<v Jonas Biery>Establishing a reserve, establishing and funding a reserve specific to that volatility will protect the city against the potential forced reductions in the event of that unexpected revenue decline and supports the city's strategy to maintain a high credit rating and the financial benefits that that high credit rating provides.

632
01:11:52.277 --> 01:12:08.470
<v Jonas Biery>So as proposed, the BLT Stabilization Reserve Policy is to reach a fully funded target of 15% of BLT revenues and to do that by funding incrementally from one-third, sort of the first one-third, of available discretionary resources.

633
01:12:08.567 --> 01:12:12.567
<v Jonas Biery>And typically that would happen now in the fall TAO or in the adopted budget.

634
01:12:13.707 --> 01:12:20.838
<v Jonas Biery>And so an upcoming slide is going to show how that's calculated for purposes of the fall TAO, assuming policy adoption.

635
01:12:21.979 --> 01:12:27.104
<v Jonas Biery>The policy as drafted also sets expectations around conditions when the fund balance can be withdrawn.

636
01:12:28.404 --> 01:12:33.715
<v Jonas Biery>It's a little bit funky Uh, wonky, to use the word that was used earlier.

637
01:12:34.180 --> 01:12:45.462
<v Jonas Biery>Um, this policy element is, is kind of nested within the larger, uh, former policy— the larger policy that was formerly called FIN 2.03 around financial planning.

638
01:12:46.038 --> 01:12:51.390
<v Jonas Biery>Um, so the idea is it just fits within that existing policy kind of category.

639
01:12:51.984 --> 01:12:56.439
<v Jonas Biery>Additionally, the City Attorney's Office has recommended a couple of additional changes.

640
01:12:56.614 --> 01:13:23.715
<v Jonas Biery>One making a handful of very, very technical administrative changes to update really language post-charter, taking out references to Office of Management and Finance and changes that don't substantially change the actual meaning of the policy, and recommending transferring the full language from the FIN 2.03, including the new BLT reserve element, to become a new Portland City Code 5.90.

641
01:13:23.842 --> 01:13:28.934
<v Jonas Biery>So moving away from the FIN Series structure and into, into a more proper code.

642
01:13:29.528 --> 01:13:37.896
<v Jonas Biery>So we're not proposing beyond those administrative updates, the very technical updates from City Attorney, and adding the new BLT reserve.

643
01:13:37.944 --> 01:14:02.167
<v Jonas Biery>We're not proposing any substantive changes to what's now PCC 590, formerly FIN 2.13, though certainly we would expect that as we've talked about financial stabilization, and looking at having a broader look at financial policy, this will be in that bucket of policies we also want to come back and look at in that project, although expect that the BLT piece may not need to be looked at then.

644
01:14:02.826 --> 01:14:15.242
<v Jonas Biery>And then again, just a reminder that that will be— I think there's 3 documents for passage as part of the fall TAO package, and one of those will be an ordinance to adopt this policy.

645
01:14:15.595 --> 01:14:18.128
<v Jonas Biery>And Ruth will talk about the numbers here in the next section.

646
01:14:20.042 --> 01:14:35.216
<v Jonas Biery>The other thing I wanted to mention and preview, again with the numbers, numbers coming, by creating this BLT reserve, it kind of jumps in front of the existing capital set-aside policy.

647
01:14:36.762 --> 01:14:45.092
<v Jonas Biery>For the last 4 or 5 years, we haven't actually used the capital set-aside policy, either because we didn't have money to put in it.

648
01:14:45.140 --> 01:14:45.189
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah.

649
01:14:45.972 --> 01:14:50.302
<v Jonas Biery>Or we made a decision that policy was waived and we didn't contribute.

650
01:14:50.847 --> 01:14:57.198
<v Jonas Biery>But I do want to remind folks, we do still have the capital set-aside policy to put funding in there.

651
01:14:57.295 --> 01:15:03.261
<v Jonas Biery>It's also— that language is also reflected in the FIN 2.03, soon to be PCC 590.

652
01:15:03.854 --> 01:15:10.846
<v Jonas Biery>That policy says that half of the excess revenues, excess available one-time general fund revenues, go towards capital investment.

653
01:15:10.895 --> 01:15:11.215
<v Jonas Biery>So that's not a new policy?

654
01:15:12.676 --> 01:15:22.193
<v Jonas Biery>And so the effect of adding in the BLT is essentially the BLT reserve gets the first third of available resource, the capital set-aside gets the next third.

655
01:15:22.850 --> 01:15:25.210
<v Jonas Biery>So 50% of what's remaining is how that's nested.

656
01:15:25.274 --> 01:15:32.384
<v Jonas Biery>And then once the BLT reserve is filled, then we don't have to contribute back to that reserve and the capital set-aside goes back to the full 50%.

657
01:15:33.845 --> 01:15:40.551
<v Jonas Biery>But do want to be clear about the fact that we expect to actually fund not to waive the capital set-aside via the fall TAO.

658
01:15:41.240 --> 01:15:45.925
<v Jonas Biery>That's also consistent with recommendation and action from the Financial Stabilization and Recovery Plan.

659
01:15:46.679 --> 01:15:49.838
<v Jonas Biery>And then I'll preview, and I think we'll get to the number here in a minute.

660
01:15:49.886 --> 01:15:52.341
<v Jonas Biery>It's $1.5 million-ish, something like that.

661
01:15:53.110 --> 01:15:55.309
<v Jonas Biery>Maybe $2 million.

662
01:15:55.356 --> 01:15:56.511
<v Jonas Biery>I can't— $2.5 million.

663
01:15:56.560 --> 01:15:56.863
<v Jonas Biery>Thank you.

664
01:15:57.698 --> 01:16:18.368
<v Jonas Biery>So the suggestion is that that capital set— that be put in kind of capital set-aside functionally and be held to address capital expenses at the Moda Center, which we know will be required to support that city asset, even if a broader redevelopment opportunity isn't reached.

665
01:16:18.417 --> 01:16:22.908
<v Jonas Biery>We still have an obligation to invest in that large asset, at least to the tune of $2.5 million.

666
01:16:25.668 --> 01:16:26.426
<v Jonas Biery>And I think—.

667
01:16:26.475 --> 01:16:28.234
<v Unidentified speaker>Questions?

668
01:16:28.911 --> 01:16:29.668
<v Unidentified speaker>Sure.

669
01:16:30.055 --> 01:16:46.018
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, why don't we— we're going to go off script and we can maybe take a few questions just on that part before the next section we'll move into, some of the more technical pieces around what's actually in the TAO outside of these, sort of the balancing and decision point efforts.

670
01:16:46.067 --> 01:16:55.907
<v Jonas Biery>But maybe we can pause and talk about either the reserve or the other technical net zero adjustments.

671
01:16:56.373 --> 01:16:56.614
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay.

672
01:16:57.354 --> 01:17:00.059
<v Jamie Dunphy>Colleagues, feel free to jump into the queue if you have any questions about this section.

673
01:17:00.171 --> 01:17:01.748
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Murillo, followed by Smith and Green.

674
01:17:04.198 --> 01:17:06.278
<v Angelita Morillo>Um, I think mine's for the next section, so I can wait.

675
01:17:06.341 --> 01:17:07.082
<v Jamie Dunphy>Sounds good.

676
01:17:07.341 --> 01:17:07.533
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you.

677
01:17:07.599 --> 01:17:08.131
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Smith.

678
01:17:08.550 --> 01:17:09.064
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

679
01:17:09.194 --> 01:17:16.824
<v Loretta Smith>When do we plan to change the, um, the BLT policy, the FIN rules on that, and who has a vote on that?

680
01:17:19.177 --> 01:17:23.319
<v Jonas Biery>Um, Councilor, are you asking when are we changing that, the policy I just described?

681
01:17:23.384 --> 01:17:23.561
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah.

682
01:17:23.851 --> 01:17:32.125
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, so that will be, um, in— so what is in the, the package, uh, accompanying the fall TAO Will be an ordinance that includes that.

683
01:17:32.670 --> 01:17:33.855
<v Jonas Biery>It currently does not exist.

684
01:17:34.127 --> 01:17:38.021
<v Loretta Smith>No, but what I'm saying, are you going to change the policy and vote on the TAO at the same time?

685
01:17:38.920 --> 01:17:49.993
<v Jonas Biery>Uh, so the suggestion would be— I haven't thought about the order, but essentially we would have an ordinance that would create the policy, and then the TAO itself would, would put some money back into that.

686
01:17:50.314 --> 01:17:51.371
<v Jonas Biery>So we already did set some—.

687
01:17:51.371 --> 01:17:52.926
<v Loretta Smith>That's really uncommon.

688
01:17:53.118 --> 01:18:04.032
<v Loretta Smith>We would have no opportunity to speak about how we change the financial policies if you're going to do it in either concurrently or consecutively in the same day.

689
01:18:04.432 --> 01:18:10.662
<v Loretta Smith>That, that seems like you need to change the policy and then write the TALP according to the new policy.

690
01:18:11.081 --> 01:18:12.220
<v Loretta Smith>That just seems so—.

691
01:18:13.247 --> 01:18:15.431
<v Jonas Biery>The opportunity exists to do that.

692
01:18:15.511 --> 01:18:31.247
<v Jonas Biery>I'll just remind folks that we did in the adopted budget, we sort of set money aside and said, let's hold this in— I think it's actually in just general fund discretionary, um, to put into this fund, this new, uh, but we don't have a policy yet.

693
01:18:31.408 --> 01:18:38.152
<v Jonas Biery>And so we could take that same approach in the, in the fall TAO and just sort of park it somewhere and come back later and create a policy.

694
01:18:38.216 --> 01:18:45.713
<v Loretta Smith>What I think you need to do is you need to go to the Committee of the Whole and have it come through the committee because we don't have a— they have a finance jurisdiction.

695
01:18:45.827 --> 01:18:45.875
<v Jonas Biery>Right.

696
01:18:45.970 --> 01:18:52.444
<v Jonas Biery>So, so, Councilor, the next step in this process, this is a work session to preview all of this will be coming to Committee of the Whole next week.

697
01:18:52.909 --> 01:18:53.086
<v Jonas Biery>Okay.

698
01:18:53.568 --> 01:18:55.255
<v Jonas Biery>Together to have that dialogue.

699
01:18:55.496 --> 01:19:00.283
<v Loretta Smith>And we're going to talk— are we talking about the TAO or are we talking about changing the FIN policy?

700
01:19:01.038 --> 01:19:01.778
<v Jonas Biery>Both and either.

701
01:19:02.228 --> 01:19:08.043
<v Jonas Biery>They will both have to pass through Finance and Governance Committee scheduled for next week.

702
01:19:08.108 --> 01:19:08.203
<v Raymond C. Lee>Okay.

703
01:19:08.252 --> 01:19:19.873
<v Loretta Smith>That's what I was like, you have not given us a chance to really look at this and to see if this is the right policy in terms of us going forward and, and what the forecast looks like.

704
01:19:19.939 --> 01:19:22.186
<v Loretta Smith>So it's some different things that you have to look at.

705
01:19:22.347 --> 01:19:23.189
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, no, appreciate that.

706
01:19:23.253 --> 01:19:26.340
<v Jonas Biery>This is, this is just intended to be a preview of what is coming to committee.

707
01:19:26.484 --> 01:19:27.386
<v Loretta Smith>Okay, thank you.

708
01:19:27.452 --> 01:19:29.384
<v Loretta Smith>You didn't tell that.

709
01:19:30.833 --> 01:19:31.929
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you much, Councilor Smith.

710
01:19:32.185 --> 01:19:32.653
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Green.

711
01:19:35.181 --> 01:19:36.603
<v Mitch Green>Uh, thank, thank you, Mr. Beery.

712
01:19:36.862 --> 01:19:40.318
<v Mitch Green>Um, fully support sort of formalizing this.

713
01:19:40.592 --> 01:19:43.548
<v Mitch Green>We've talked about it, I think, for a while in a couple different venues.

714
01:19:44.369 --> 01:19:54.489
<v Mitch Green>I just want to make sure I clarify, and for everyone reaching along, because I think you might come away with the wrong impression if you just glance at the bullet points.

715
01:19:54.489 --> 01:19:57.680
<v Mitch Green>You're not saying we're going to do $10 million a year.

716
01:19:57.680 --> 01:20:02.340
<v Mitch Green>You're saying it's a third of whatever we have that's available.

717
01:20:02.710 --> 01:20:07.210
<v Mitch Green>So if we have a lean year, if it's $1 million, it'd be $300,000 of that, right?

718
01:20:07.210 --> 01:20:09.289
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, Councilor, that's correct.

719
01:20:09.289 --> 01:20:11.970
<v Jonas Biery>It's just drafted to be whatever's available.

720
01:20:11.970 --> 01:20:13.689
<v Jonas Biery>It takes the first third of whatever's available.

721
01:20:13.689 --> 01:20:18.131
<v Jonas Biery>If there's zero available, There's zero that goes into the fund per this policy.

722
01:20:18.195 --> 01:20:22.489
<v Jonas Biery>Council could always choose to do something otherwise, you know, above policy.

723
01:20:23.306 --> 01:20:33.113
<v Jonas Biery>If it's $30 million that's available, then $10 million would go into the fund, obviously until the fund is fully funded, and then we would only transfer what we need to get to that 15% target.

724
01:20:33.480 --> 01:20:41.347
<v Mitch Green>I just wanted to reinforce that point because it's sort of automatically scaled by where we're at in the business cycle, where we're at in the volatility.

725
01:20:41.412 --> 01:20:42.005
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, that's correct.

726
01:20:42.052 --> 01:20:56.122
<v Jonas Biery>And it might be worth noting too with the amount that was sort of set aside in the adopted budget and with this proposed transfer, if council adopts all of that, we're still only at less than 3%.

727
01:20:57.069 --> 01:21:04.426
<v Jonas Biery>And so while it's good that we're putting money in there, it's still quite a ways off from the kind of prudent 15% target.

728
01:21:05.422 --> 01:21:05.680
<v Dan Ryan>Thank you.

729
01:21:06.484 --> 01:21:07.189
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Green.

730
01:21:07.430 --> 01:21:08.137
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.

731
01:21:09.295 --> 01:21:10.418
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Council President.

732
01:21:11.800 --> 01:21:17.671
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>First piece, going back a section, I just want to make sure we will have details when we hear this in Committee of the Whole.

733
01:21:17.944 --> 01:21:24.907
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>You mentioned that on the net zero and non-general fund decisions, there are a number of parks decisions that draw on the parks levy.

734
01:21:25.725 --> 01:21:49.230
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I will want to know when we get the more detailed presentation what that does to the future sustainability of the parks levy and the ability to ensure that at the end of the parks levy, we are still spending at a sustainable level, and we haven't drawn down in front years so much that we will have boxed ourselves into asking Portlanders for an increase again at the end.

735
01:21:51.082 --> 01:22:10.653
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Moving back forward to the most recent slides, you said that the recommendation we should expect this year is that the funding for— the funding in our financial policy that goes to infrastructure maintenance, the recommendation will be that that go to the Moda Center.

736
01:22:11.904 --> 01:22:29.618
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Will that— is that funding that you are foreseeing as being available to help offset a city cost for a full remodel there, or is that funding that you see as being available for ongoing upkeep and maintenance of the facility?

737
01:22:30.277 --> 01:22:37.186
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Those are very different things, and if we're talking about ongoing upkeep and maintenance, which we've previously funded through other sources.

738
01:22:38.770 --> 01:22:47.798
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I at least would think about that recommendation very differently than money that you are saying, hey, we know we're going to have a large project coming soon.

739
01:22:47.863 --> 01:22:49.730
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We've been talking about it for quite a while.

740
01:22:50.536 --> 01:22:53.836
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>This is the first part of trying to find the dollars to go toward that.

741
01:22:54.078 --> 01:22:55.902
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, it's a good question, Councilor.

742
01:22:55.998 --> 01:23:06.435
<v Jonas Biery>I think the intent is that, A, it's, it's that's sort of available to help contribute to a more immediate large redevelopment plan if that goes forward.

743
01:23:06.483 --> 01:23:09.015
<v Jonas Biery>And I think we'll learn more about that soon.

744
01:23:09.350 --> 01:23:18.068
<v Jonas Biery>And recognizing if that doesn't go forward, we still will have a need to do some major investment outside of sort of the normal upkeep and maintenance that—.

745
01:23:19.046 --> 01:23:19.430
<v Jonas Biery>If that—.

746
01:23:19.703 --> 01:23:32.823
<v Jonas Biery>My understanding is if that building is to retain— remain viable, we'll have to come up with sort of an alternative plan that will still require significant capital investment and likely city capital investment.

747
01:23:32.887 --> 01:23:47.015
<v Jonas Biery>And so it's really about kind of keeping optionality open around that, recognizing that that's potentially one of the larger obligations that the city knows we have coming on the— capital obligations that we have coming on the near— in our near term.

748
01:23:47.065 --> 01:23:47.873
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you for that clarification.

749
01:23:49.479 --> 01:23:49.668
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you.

750
01:23:49.720 --> 01:23:50.528
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.

751
01:23:51.498 --> 01:23:53.216
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think we can move to the next section.

752
01:23:54.197 --> 01:23:56.412
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, okay, I think we're gonna take a short break.

753
01:23:56.604 --> 01:23:57.423
<v Jamie Dunphy>Oh, is this time for a break?

754
01:23:57.505 --> 01:23:58.645
<v Unidentified speaker>Let's take a break if you want one.

755
01:23:58.773 --> 01:23:59.287
<v Jamie Dunphy>That's great.

756
01:23:59.414 --> 01:24:01.743
<v Jamie Dunphy>Uh, folks, let's have everybody back here at 3:30.

757
01:24:02.466 --> 01:24:03.220
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you.

758
01:40:20.230 --> 01:40:25.958
<v Jamie Dunphy>You know, all right, welcome back, folks.

759
01:40:26.621 --> 01:40:31.292
<v Jamie Dunphy>Jonas, Ruth, take us on through the second half of chunk number 2.

760
01:40:31.697 --> 01:40:46.451
<v Unidentified speaker>All right, so the next, uh, section of material we're going to go through is how the fall TAO as proposed, as filed for committee next week balances the general fund.

761
01:40:46.610 --> 01:40:53.805
<v Unidentified speaker>So we talked about the fund balance change earlier, and this sort of picks up from there and then says, now what do we do, right?

762
01:40:54.238 --> 01:41:04.189
<v Unidentified speaker>So the first line— well, this slide is kind of an overview of all of the different changes, and I'm actually going to walk through them one by one on the subsequent slides.

763
01:41:05.149 --> 01:41:06.832
<v Unidentified speaker>So this is the first piece.

764
01:41:06.896 --> 01:41:24.411
<v Unidentified speaker>That is what we showed, what I showed at the beginning with the actual ending fund balance and then the budgeted beginning fund balance, which once you subtract that, you end up with about $14.7 million as kind of the starting fund balance.

765
01:41:25.689 --> 01:41:28.206
<v Unidentified speaker>And so that's kind of what— that's where we start.

766
01:41:28.367 --> 01:41:33.045
<v Unidentified speaker>And there's a little tracker at the bottom that shows how we get from there down to zero.

767
01:41:33.449 --> 01:41:37.923
<v Unidentified speaker>And again, that's just because we're filing a balanced A balanced budget.

768
01:41:38.037 --> 01:41:41.637
<v Unidentified speaker>And so there has to— it has to go somewhere in the filing.

769
01:41:43.630 --> 01:41:48.594
<v Unidentified speaker>So this slide shows all of the— they're called required adjustments.

770
01:41:48.980 --> 01:41:52.993
<v Unidentified speaker>They're adjustments that are governed by existing policies or legal requirements.

771
01:41:54.149 --> 01:42:02.903
<v Unidentified speaker>And some of these we talked about last fall, but we filed with sort of fulfilling all of those existing policies and legal requirements.

772
01:42:02.952 --> 01:42:03.064
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

773
01:42:03.166 --> 01:42:03.246
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

774
01:42:03.744 --> 01:42:17.153
<v Unidentified speaker>The first one is the way previous council set up a funding mechanism for short-term rental revenue to go to the Housing Investment Fund.

775
01:42:17.201 --> 01:42:23.029
<v Unidentified speaker>It specifically directs us to send it in the fall TAO, the amount that came in above the forecast.

776
01:42:23.484 --> 01:42:25.657
<v Unidentified speaker>And so this year that number is $2.1 million.

777
01:42:26.014 --> 01:42:27.975
<v Unidentified speaker>So that moves over to the Housing Investment Fund.

778
01:42:28.739 --> 01:42:35.893
<v Unidentified speaker>There's $40,000 of labor contract pieces that are required.

779
01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:40.266
<v Unidentified speaker>The next one is a clean air construction policy carryover.

780
01:42:40.347 --> 01:42:54.158
<v Unidentified speaker>That's essentially a sort of required carryover amount of anything they didn't spend is sort of— there's a policy to carry that forward, and that amount is $387,000 this year.

781
01:42:54.908 --> 01:43:11.654
<v Unidentified speaker>And then there's a $700,000 settlement amount for PFFA for sort of an amount from the fire health and wellness funds that were sort of incorrectly removed from that fund in the proposed budget.

782
01:43:11.783 --> 01:43:14.384
<v Unidentified speaker>And so this would backfill that amount.

783
01:43:15.701 --> 01:43:19.747
<v Unidentified speaker>And so once you make all of those adjustments, those total $3.2 million.

784
01:43:20.118 --> 01:43:23.006
<v Unidentified speaker>You're left with $11.5 million.

785
01:43:24.797 --> 01:43:29.494
<v Unidentified speaker>The next page is sort of true technical corrections in that they were like errors in the budget.

786
01:43:31.010 --> 01:43:38.649
<v Unidentified speaker>And so there's 2 of them, and they actually increase the fund balance together by half a million dollars.

787
01:43:41.109 --> 01:43:43.356
<v Unidentified speaker>And so that gets you to $12 million.

788
01:43:44.828 --> 01:43:47.445
<v Unidentified speaker>After that, we get into encumbrance carryovers.

789
01:43:47.493 --> 01:43:47.559
<v Jamie Dunphy>Yes.

790
01:43:48.407 --> 01:44:04.934
<v Unidentified speaker>As a reminder, Jonas mentioned this at the start of the presentation, but we've had guidance about what is— what the criteria are for encumbrance carryovers, and we sort of tightened those and reiterated them for bureaus this year as we went into the fall TAO process.

791
01:44:06.216 --> 01:44:08.748
<v Unidentified speaker>So these are for the general fund only.

792
01:44:08.877 --> 01:44:14.439
<v Unidentified speaker>So other funds also do carryovers in their own way, but this is for general fund encumbrance carryovers.

793
01:44:15.935 --> 01:44:19.275
<v Unidentified speaker>The bureau has to have had actual underspending to cover it.

794
01:44:21.002 --> 01:44:26.462
<v Unidentified speaker>They are— it says that they're supposed to be unable to absorb the expense in the current fiscal year's budget.

795
01:44:27.662 --> 01:44:30.872
<v Unidentified speaker>So it's not just we had this underspending, we want it back.

796
01:44:32.239 --> 01:44:36.301
<v Unidentified speaker>The request is supposed to be one-time in nature, so it shouldn't be for ongoing programming.

797
01:44:36.414 --> 01:44:39.793
<v Unidentified speaker>It should be for a one-time thing that didn't get completed in the prior fiscal year.

798
01:44:39.842 --> 01:44:39.988
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

799
01:44:40.724 --> 01:44:43.791
<v Unidentified speaker>And then that the request is critical for operations.

800
01:44:44.471 --> 01:44:55.087
<v Unidentified speaker>And so through the process of sort of reiterating those, we ended up with many fewer encumbrance carryover requests this year than we have in previous years.

801
01:44:55.216 --> 01:44:58.717
<v Unidentified speaker>So I think that was positive overall in terms of the process.

802
01:45:01.283 --> 01:45:03.118
<v Unidentified speaker>This slide gives a little bit more detail.

803
01:45:03.213 --> 01:45:09.056
<v Unidentified speaker>And again, we have full details for all of the decision packages in Exhibit 5.

804
01:45:09.154 --> 01:45:09.298
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

805
01:45:09.912 --> 01:45:19.070
<v Unidentified speaker>We also collected information preemptively that council was interested in last year when we went through this encumbrance carryover process.

806
01:45:19.152 --> 01:45:35.796
<v Unidentified speaker>So bureaus have submitted— we have a complete spreadsheet with all of the purchase orders that each of these dollars is connected to, what it's for, why it was underspent, and what would happen if sort of this funding wasn't allocated.

807
01:45:37.930 --> 01:45:42.020
<v Unidentified speaker>And happy to answer additional questions on that.

808
01:45:42.756 --> 01:45:52.427
<v Unidentified speaker>But this is— that's the breakdown by bureau, and then the total amount was— is $4.6 million.

809
01:45:53.020 --> 01:46:01.248
<v Unidentified speaker>So if those are funded, that sort of comes out of the ending fund balance because that underspending fell to balance in the general fund and became part of that $14.7 number.

810
01:46:01.313 --> 01:46:01.457
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

811
01:46:02.804 --> 01:46:07.711
<v Unidentified speaker>So that leaves us with $7.4 million.

812
01:46:09.122 --> 01:46:20.860
<v Unidentified speaker>That $7.4 million is the basis on which we calculated the amounts per the BLT policy and capital set-aside policy that Jonas talked about a little bit ago.

813
01:46:21.261 --> 01:46:28.719
<v Unidentified speaker>So the way those, those policies read, that's— this is kind of the point in the process where that gets applied.

814
01:46:30.130 --> 01:46:42.345
<v Unidentified speaker>And so the way that math works out is a third of that total goes to BLT, that's $2.5 million, and then 50% of the remainder goes to capital set-aside.

815
01:46:42.393 --> 01:46:45.293
<v Unidentified speaker>The other 50% stays sort of unallocated.

816
01:46:45.935 --> 01:46:49.140
<v Unidentified speaker>50% Of 2/3 is 1/3, so they all get 1/3.

817
01:46:49.766 --> 01:47:02.426
<v Unidentified speaker>And so it's $2.5 million to each of those buckets, $2.5 million to BLT reserve, $2.5 million to cap set-aside, and then the remaining $2.5 million is sort of available to be allocated.

818
01:47:05.465 --> 01:47:11.238
<v Unidentified speaker>Then we move to kind of more discretionary decision points.

819
01:47:11.367 --> 01:47:18.398
<v Unidentified speaker>This list is also much smaller than it has been in previous years, and most of them are a little, like, somewhat technical.

820
01:47:18.462 --> 01:47:20.475
<v Unidentified speaker>I already talked about the core services realignment.

821
01:47:20.685 --> 01:47:20.992
<v Unidentified speaker>Piece.

822
01:47:21.104 --> 01:47:24.835
<v Unidentified speaker>That's a $342,000 hit to the general fund.

823
01:47:24.963 --> 01:47:30.195
<v Unidentified speaker>Again, most of that is from changing the way things are being paid for, not by adding things.

824
01:47:31.710 --> 01:47:34.377
<v Unidentified speaker>The Vision Zero amount is not a new request.

825
01:47:34.537 --> 01:47:37.333
<v Unidentified speaker>It's also changing the way we're paying for something.

826
01:47:37.430 --> 01:47:55.826
<v Unidentified speaker>Essentially, it was raised that we were paying for this through the public works bureaus and that it was supposed to be a citywide allocation, and that sort of to legally— to remain compliant with Anderson and legal guidance around that, we should move it to general fund overhead.

827
01:47:57.180 --> 01:48:06.265
<v Unidentified speaker>Right, for right now, for the current fiscal year, we're putting it into general fund discretionary because we don't rerun the overhead numbers in the middle of the fiscal year.

828
01:48:08.039 --> 01:48:09.594
<v Unidentified speaker>So that's what that is.

829
01:48:09.643 --> 01:48:11.016
<v Unidentified speaker>It's not a new thing.

830
01:48:11.131 --> 01:48:12.145
<v Unidentified speaker>It's just changing how we pay for it.

831
01:48:12.194 --> 01:48:12.375
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

832
01:48:12.782 --> 01:48:28.872
<v Unidentified speaker>And then the auditor's compensation set-aside package, that $240,000 is essentially an amount that was intended to be included in the budget, but because we were changing how we did compensation set-aside, there was some confusion around that process.

833
01:48:30.188 --> 01:48:39.740
<v Unidentified speaker>They weren't the only bureau that had that issue, but in terms of just getting it correct in the proposed, and so okay.

834
01:48:39.822 --> 01:48:45.791
<v Unidentified speaker>So, but the fall TAO as filed includes that amount going to the auditor's office.

835
01:48:48.409 --> 01:49:02.958
<v Unidentified speaker>So all of those decisions, if council were to fund all of those, that would be about $800,000 of the remaining $2.5 million, and then for rounding, $2.4 million.

836
01:49:03.300 --> 01:49:16.872
<v Unidentified speaker>And then the— what's left then is $1.6 million, and that is the amount that's kind of— once you run through all these different things, what you're left with.

837
01:49:18.819 --> 01:49:29.511
<v Unidentified speaker>The fall TAO as filed recommends placing that into unrestricted general fund contingency this year, and I will talk on the next slide about why that is.

838
01:49:31.386 --> 01:49:38.561
<v Unidentified speaker>As a reminder, we have less than normal contingency at this point of the fiscal year because of the July supplemental.

839
01:49:40.189 --> 01:49:54.103
<v Unidentified speaker>And so this would avoid kind of putting all that pressure on the spring and kind of preload a little bit of that amount that was discussed for the spring to replenish those contingencies.

840
01:49:57.231 --> 01:49:58.497
<v Unidentified speaker>A few things on this slide.

841
01:49:59.447 --> 01:50:08.731
<v Unidentified speaker>About kind of remaining current year uncertainties other than all of the regular uncertainties about things that none of us can control or know at this point in the fiscal year.

842
01:50:10.128 --> 01:50:11.880
<v Unidentified speaker>There are some sort of known unknowns.

843
01:50:13.020 --> 01:50:22.273
<v Unidentified speaker>The first is around council operations related to potential council transition costs and then Open Signal needs for the Open Signal budget.

844
01:50:23.542 --> 01:50:33.273
<v Unidentified speaker>Parks also did not get the compensation set-aside amount included in their current year budget, but we've recommended waiting until the spring to fill that amount.

845
01:50:34.557 --> 01:50:45.894
<v Unidentified speaker>There are some early projections for the Police Bureau on their spending, although it is very early in the fiscal year, so I want to emphasize that we don't have a lot of certainty around that right now.

846
01:50:46.680 --> 01:50:52.043
<v Unidentified speaker>And then there's other dynamics happening that could impact personnel costs citywide.

847
01:50:53.542 --> 01:50:55.246
<v Unidentified speaker>That's all on the expense side.

848
01:50:55.310 --> 01:51:04.595
<v Unidentified speaker>On the revenue side, there's a little bit of continued BLT volatility around the impacts of HR 1 and how that may play out in the current fiscal year.

849
01:51:07.920 --> 01:51:07.935
<v Raymond C. Lee>I—.

850
01:51:08.128 --> 01:51:09.885
<v Unidentified speaker>Oh, a couple more things.

851
01:51:10.095 --> 01:51:17.060
<v Unidentified speaker>I think this is the last thing on fall TAO, is just we wanted to highlight some of the grant adjustments.

852
01:51:17.779 --> 01:51:30.060
<v Unidentified speaker>There are Both carryovers of multi-year grant awards, so amounts that were appropriated last year but for a multi-year time frame and have to be reappropriated this year.

853
01:51:30.813 --> 01:51:37.846
<v Unidentified speaker>And then there's also appropriations of new grants, and that's that right-hand column there of $10.5 million.

854
01:51:38.359 --> 01:51:59.640
<v Unidentified speaker>We do have backup also for all of this, so we can share a spreadsheet that details all of the grants, whether they're new or have So I think we can do any questions at this point on fall TAO before we turn to budget process and calendar.

855
01:52:01.841 --> 01:52:02.278
<v Jamie Dunphy>Sounds good.

856
01:52:02.326 --> 01:52:03.993
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Murillo and then Councilor Smith.

857
01:52:06.539 --> 01:52:07.204
<v Angelita Morillo>Um, thank you.

858
01:52:08.015 --> 01:52:11.471
<v Angelita Morillo>Uh, thanks for bringing up the July supplemental.

859
01:52:11.601 --> 01:52:13.662
<v Angelita Morillo>I had one question on that part.

860
01:52:15.605 --> 01:52:28.319
<v Angelita Morillo>So when anticipated funds from underspending, interest accruals, and other resources develop in the spring TAO, the funds will be used to restore the general fund contingency.

861
01:52:29.078 --> 01:52:31.610
<v Angelita Morillo>And I think it was $9.96 million that I saw.

862
01:52:32.949 --> 01:52:36.430
<v Angelita Morillo>Was— and this isn't a trick question, I'm just genuinely asking sort of the rationale for this.

863
01:52:36.542 --> 01:52:43.667
<v Angelita Morillo>Was there any consideration of using the $5 million you currently propose to allocate to the BLT stabilization reserve and capital set aside?

864
01:52:45.046 --> 01:52:46.992
<v Angelita Morillo>To buy down that future liability now?

865
01:52:49.443 --> 01:52:53.033
<v Angelita Morillo>Because it feels like we don't have any answers for how that's going to come back in the spring.

866
01:52:55.141 --> 01:53:01.541
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, Councilor, I'll attempt to answer the question, and I think there's kind of a twofold answer.

867
01:53:02.557 --> 01:53:28.317
<v Jonas Biery>One is, at least as if we assume that the BLT policy passes as proposed, The way those— between the new BLT stabilization reserve policy element and the existing capital set-aside would, if we are following those policies, it would not be, frankly, I think, an administrative decision to fund those otherwise.

868
01:53:28.413 --> 01:53:30.212
<v Jonas Biery>That would be something that council would have to decide.

869
01:53:30.277 --> 01:53:36.588
<v Jonas Biery>So just calling out that fact that we're sort of just trying to follow the policies or assumed policies.

870
01:53:39.418 --> 01:53:55.411
<v Jonas Biery>And the second piece to the answer is I agree with you for sure that we are continuing to run really lean with regard to contingency, recognizing those future expectations.

871
01:53:56.920 --> 01:54:10.248
<v Jonas Biery>So there is a path that council could choose to differently apply policies or waive policies and put more money to sort of fill that future contingency challenge.

872
01:54:11.292 --> 01:54:23.007
<v Jonas Biery>I think, you know, our perspective was that we were always going to be in a place where we were going to need to carefully manage underspending to fill that gap in the spring.

873
01:54:23.685 --> 01:54:25.414
<v Jonas Biery>We will continue to need to do that.

874
01:54:25.787 --> 01:54:39.733
<v Jonas Biery>If we're able to put this $1.6 million It gives us a greater chance of success, but there's certainly other pathways to do that that would just have different trade-offs, i.e., you know, not shoring up kind of other reserves, et cetera.

875
01:54:41.180 --> 01:54:42.658
<v Angelita Morillo>Gotcha.

876
01:54:42.882 --> 01:54:50.210
<v Angelita Morillo>So to summarize what you've said in plain language, maybe let me reiterate it and see if I fully understand it.

877
01:54:50.838 --> 01:54:56.085
<v Angelita Morillo>We borrowed general fund contingency for this budget ordinance to the tune of $10 million.

878
01:54:56.689 --> 01:55:01.771
<v Angelita Morillo>Roughly, and the ordinance requires us to repay that from whatever might be available in the spring.

879
01:55:02.514 --> 01:55:09.904
<v Angelita Morillo>But today we have $5 million that we could put into the general fund contingency to relieve pressure on the general fund bureaus to underspend.

880
01:55:10.676 --> 01:55:17.391
<v Angelita Morillo>So wouldn't that be a better use of that money to pay down those current obligations before we set up reserves for new ones?

881
01:55:19.842 --> 01:55:22.699
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, I think it's— they're different.

882
01:55:24.639 --> 01:55:26.770
<v Jonas Biery>Different flavors of similar risk, right?

883
01:55:26.836 --> 01:55:43.462
<v Jonas Biery>We're sort of taking a $5 million amount that we expect we need to sort of hold for safety or other future needs, which by the way, we could take back in the spring as well if we needed, and continuing to sort of build the rigor around the underspending.

884
01:55:44.994 --> 01:55:55.769
<v Jonas Biery>And again, just reiterate, I think, The perspective that I would take is I don't think it's the administration's role to suggest not following policy.

885
01:55:57.244 --> 01:56:06.726
<v Jonas Biery>So again, I just flagged that would be something if council wanted to consider, for example, waiving the capital set-aside policy as we have in the recent past.

886
01:56:07.127 --> 01:56:14.378
<v Jonas Biery>If council wanted to consider not funding the BLT reserve, that would be something that we'd look to y'all to propose.

887
01:56:16.335 --> 01:56:16.655
<v Angelita Morillo>Gotcha.

888
01:56:16.960 --> 01:56:23.212
<v Angelita Morillo>And when you're talking about the policy that you don't want to waive, or you're talking about 2.03, right?

889
01:56:23.693 --> 01:56:24.525
<v Jonas Biery>Uh, correct.

890
01:56:24.591 --> 01:56:28.518
<v Jonas Biery>So the, the capital set-aside policy is embedded within 2.03.

891
01:56:28.597 --> 01:56:30.810
<v Jonas Biery>It might be another subsection, I can't remember exactly.

892
01:56:31.466 --> 01:56:33.439
<v Jonas Biery>Um, uh, we can look that up for you.

893
01:56:34.112 --> 01:56:37.783
<v Jonas Biery>Um, that references, um, that sort of that first 50%.

894
01:56:37.895 --> 01:56:42.881
<v Jonas Biery>Uh, so that is a policy that would be, um, technically would need to be waived.

895
01:56:43.489 --> 01:56:54.792
<v Jonas Biery>Uh, and then the BLT policy is the, the new proposed kind of insert into that that we discussed earlier, subject to council adoption of that ordinance and policy.

896
01:56:56.127 --> 01:57:09.091
<v Angelita Morillo>Yeah, because for— so my understanding is that Financial Policy 2.03 is supposed to be 50% of general fund discretionary money goes towards infrastructure and maintenance replacement.

897
01:57:09.685 --> 01:57:26.811
<v Angelita Morillo>But so I'm not suggesting that we waive that policy, but I am asking if we should address current liabilities before we start following new policies or policies that we haven't followed in a few years, because to my knowledge, I don't recall us using that policy last year.

898
01:57:27.646 --> 01:57:32.123
<v Angelita Morillo>And I don't think the city has followed 2.03 for the past 6 years.

899
01:57:33.264 --> 01:57:40.548
<v Angelita Morillo>And, you know, maybe we should because we have a lot of parks and roads that have dire need for maintenance upgrades.

900
01:57:42.909 --> 01:57:49.750
<v Angelita Morillo>But I suspect that these dollars are going to be set aside for a different project than the existing projects that we have now.

901
01:57:50.283 --> 01:57:50.606
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, yeah.

902
01:57:50.752 --> 01:57:58.064
<v Jonas Biery>And Councilor, you're correct that we have, we have not transferred funds into that capital set aside for the last many years.

903
01:57:58.177 --> 01:58:05.082
<v Jonas Biery>I know it was at least 4 or 5, maybe it's even 6, partially because like last year, I think there just wasn't— there was $0.

904
01:58:05.551 --> 01:58:08.703
<v Jonas Biery>So the application, you know, 50% of 0 is 0.

905
01:58:09.430 --> 01:58:10.545
<v Jonas Biery>I think that's been the case in at least one other year.

906
01:58:11.859 --> 01:58:20.628
<v Jonas Biery>And then you're right, absolutely, that there have been multiple years where that policy was waived to fund other things in that year.

907
01:58:21.082 --> 01:58:30.521
<v Jonas Biery>And so it is a very specific recommendation that we're making to not waive the policy again and to actually use that as intended.

908
01:58:30.604 --> 01:58:33.314
<v Jonas Biery>But again, up to council's discretion to make that choice.

909
01:58:35.645 --> 01:58:35.806
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay.

910
01:58:36.243 --> 01:58:40.399
<v Angelita Morillo>So basically that policy is obviously only enforced when there's funds to move.

911
01:58:40.447 --> 01:58:41.385
<v Angelita Morillo>And in the years that we haven't done it, they're not going to move it.

912
01:58:43.466 --> 01:58:44.877
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay, that makes sense.

913
01:58:45.631 --> 01:58:47.378
<v Angelita Morillo>I think that's all I have for this section.

914
01:58:47.828 --> 01:58:50.393
<v Unidentified speaker>Sorry, can I just clarify one other thing on that?

915
01:58:50.457 --> 01:59:01.618
<v Unidentified speaker>So the July supplemental, part of the funding from that came from the BLT reserve, and that BLT reserve is held in contingency.

916
01:59:01.682 --> 01:59:05.739
<v Unidentified speaker>So it is still— it can still be accessed in the current year.

917
01:59:05.787 --> 01:59:08.033
<v Unidentified speaker>So it's not like moving it out entirely.

918
01:59:08.097 --> 01:59:09.765
<v Unidentified speaker>It's still able to be accessed in the current year.

919
01:59:12.426 --> 01:59:13.387
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay, thank you so much.

920
01:59:13.693 --> 01:59:16.096
<v Angelita Morillo>Um, I think that's all my questions for this portion for now.

921
01:59:16.337 --> 01:59:16.594
<v Angelita Morillo>Thanks.

922
01:59:17.154 --> 01:59:17.957
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Maria.

923
01:59:18.261 --> 01:59:18.725
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Smith.

924
01:59:19.720 --> 01:59:20.826
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you, Council President.

925
01:59:20.905 --> 01:59:21.306
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

926
01:59:21.724 --> 01:59:26.596
<v Loretta Smith>Could we go back to the $2.1 million in the short-term rental investment?

927
01:59:26.676 --> 01:59:36.470
<v Loretta Smith>Can you walk me through why we are paying something back, or is this based on the rental, uh, the number of rental rates?

928
01:59:36.519 --> 01:59:38.086
<v Loretta Smith>Because you could you explain that one to me?

929
01:59:38.328 --> 01:59:40.364
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, so we're not paying anything back.

930
01:59:40.429 --> 01:59:44.179
<v Unidentified speaker>It's just the policy as it was written, and I can get you the citation.

931
01:59:44.243 --> 01:59:47.796
<v Unidentified speaker>I think it was a 2016 resolution that was adopted.

932
01:59:50.015 --> 02:00:01.873
<v Unidentified speaker>It just set up that as essentially when they were early in creating that short-term rental revenue fee, they directed some of it to the Housing Investment Fund.

933
02:00:02.828 --> 02:00:19.963
<v Unidentified speaker>And part of the policy at that time was to take amounts that came in, because it comes into the general fund, amounts that come in above the forecast were direct— were to be transferred in the fall bump at the time to the Housing Investment Fund.

934
02:00:20.414 --> 02:00:21.416
<v Unidentified speaker>So that's just the policy.

935
02:00:21.609 --> 02:00:23.585
<v Unidentified speaker>That's just how they wrote the policy at the time.

936
02:00:23.698 --> 02:00:25.140
<v Loretta Smith>And we've been following this policy?

937
02:00:25.819 --> 02:00:26.595
<v Unidentified speaker>We have.

938
02:00:27.421 --> 02:00:31.394
<v Unidentified speaker>And but council has, you know, You could decide not to follow it.

939
02:00:31.474 --> 02:00:31.844
<v Loretta Smith>We just—.

940
02:00:31.876 --> 02:00:32.310
<v Unidentified speaker>That's how we follow it.

941
02:00:32.373 --> 02:00:44.680
<v Loretta Smith>Well, what I'm trying to figure out is, because this $2.1 million looks very similar to a $2.1 million that we had in our Spring Towel, and is this an attempt to get that money back?

942
02:00:48.568 --> 02:00:48.761
<v Mitch Green>No.

943
02:00:49.226 --> 02:00:53.613
<v Loretta Smith>I still don't know what the— how you calculated $2.1 million.

944
02:00:53.981 --> 02:01:05.823
<v Loretta Smith>So are you saying that we— the money that we received on the rental Um, the short-term rental monies that we received $2.1 million above that?

945
02:01:06.759 --> 02:01:13.850
<v Unidentified speaker>Whatever was budgeted, we received $2.1 million more than that, and it comes— it falls into the general fund, and then we send it out.

946
02:01:14.349 --> 02:01:19.261
<v Unidentified speaker>So this is just the mechanism that was established in that resolution per that council.

947
02:01:19.390 --> 02:01:31.814
<v Loretta Smith>Seems like that could be fool's gold because you could put— I'm going to budget $2.1 million and say, you know what you are likely to have come in, and then you just take another $3 million and put it in there.

948
02:01:32.252 --> 02:01:40.693
<v Loretta Smith>So I don't know how you can budget $2.1 million lower.

949
02:01:41.222 --> 02:01:42.960
<v Loretta Smith>How do you budget that?

950
02:01:43.009 --> 02:01:45.338
<v Loretta Smith>That seems like an awfully big number.

951
02:01:45.860 --> 02:01:53.253
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, Councilor, let me— I think this is around the revenue that's collected, not the expense.

952
02:01:53.319 --> 02:02:06.773
<v Jonas Biery>So what happens is You know, the Housing Bureau budgets an amount, an expense amount, based upon what they expect to receive, the amount of revenues they expect to receive, so that their revenues match expenditures as required.

953
02:02:07.333 --> 02:02:14.033
<v Jonas Biery>What happens, what happened this year is that fund, the short-term rental revenue, was more than expected.

954
02:02:14.402 --> 02:02:15.701
<v Jonas Biery>So it's $2.1 million.

955
02:02:16.614 --> 02:02:22.368
<v Jonas Biery>Ergo, the existing policy council direction says take that additional revenue.

956
02:02:22.417 --> 02:02:22.465
<v Jonas Biery>Okay.

957
02:02:23.106 --> 02:02:25.130
<v Jonas Biery>And adjust in the fall TAO.

958
02:02:25.371 --> 02:02:28.502
<v Loretta Smith>So no fund money, that's, that's straight general fund money, right?

959
02:02:28.838 --> 02:02:29.192
<v Loretta Smith>It could be—.

960
02:02:29.208 --> 02:02:31.328
<v Jonas Biery>It's collected into the general fund.

961
02:02:31.537 --> 02:02:32.067
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah.

962
02:02:32.820 --> 02:02:36.948
<v Jonas Biery>And sorry, the other thing I would just note is, you know, we call these required adjustments.

963
02:02:37.011 --> 02:02:42.567
<v Jonas Biery>As Ruth said, uh, there's probably a pathway where council could choose to modify or adjust the policy.

964
02:02:42.614 --> 02:02:51.970
<v Jonas Biery>We call them required because we feel like they're required for us to make because they're reflective of existing because you knew what I was getting ready to say.

965
02:02:52.819 --> 02:02:58.092
<v Loretta Smith>Because I was going to tell you, you're taking our job away and you just put that $2.1 million where you want it to.

966
02:02:58.654 --> 02:02:59.054
<v Eric Zimmerman>Yeah, yeah.

967
02:02:59.135 --> 02:03:05.801
<v Jonas Biery>And just, I, you know, we don't— I would say from my seat, um, I don't have a position where I can do things outside of what council directs.

968
02:03:05.881 --> 02:03:08.190
<v Jonas Biery>And so these are things that we've been directed by council.

969
02:03:08.606 --> 02:03:12.310
<v Jonas Biery>If council directs to do something otherwise, then, uh, then that's what can be reflected.

970
02:03:12.677 --> 02:03:15.034
<v Loretta Smith>Yeah, but wouldn't you take that money out?

971
02:03:15.099 --> 02:03:16.332
<v Loretta Smith>Why are you taking it out now?

972
02:03:16.461 --> 02:03:22.471
<v Loretta Smith>Because this could be used as a part of a bump and not waiting to take it out of this, the, the spring budget?

973
02:03:22.712 --> 02:03:24.368
<v Loretta Smith>Why are you taking it out now?

974
02:03:24.577 --> 02:03:31.340
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, as Ruth said, I believe that's specifically what the language in the legislation says, is do it in the fall, uh, fall adjustment.

975
02:03:31.470 --> 02:03:32.835
<v Loretta Smith>So do it in the fall adjustment.

976
02:03:33.502 --> 02:03:33.680
<v Loretta Smith>Okay.

977
02:03:34.614 --> 02:03:49.247
<v Loretta Smith>Um, the, the other piece is, uh, why would the new grants be appropriated out of the fall adjustment and not the bigger budget?

978
02:03:50.079 --> 02:03:53.583
<v Loretta Smith>Shouldn't that be in the bigger budget already, the new grants?

979
02:03:54.859 --> 02:03:57.797
<v Loretta Smith>Because if they're new, you know you're going to appropriate so many grants.

980
02:03:57.863 --> 02:03:59.815
<v Loretta Smith>Why was that not put in the original budget?

981
02:04:02.139 --> 02:04:07.474
<v Unidentified speaker>So I believe we can get you the details, and we have a full spreadsheet of all of the grants.

982
02:04:07.523 --> 02:04:14.581
<v Unidentified speaker>I believe these are things that have come in this fiscal year that they may not— that bureaus may not have known they were going to get this fiscal year.

983
02:04:15.110 --> 02:04:24.011
<v Loretta Smith>Okay, so these are grants that we got awarded from outside sources that we are now getting ready to award, but we're using our own general fund money?

984
02:04:25.167 --> 02:04:26.823
<v Unidentified speaker>No, it's entirely in the grants fund.

985
02:04:26.871 --> 02:04:28.670
<v Unidentified speaker>It's all grant money.

986
02:04:28.926 --> 02:04:34.036
<v Loretta Smith>I really don't even understand the grants money because all of a sudden it's a big multi-hundred million dollar grant.

987
02:04:34.083 --> 02:04:42.055
<v Loretta Smith>I don't know where they get their money or how they get but so are you saying that they did not know about this in the spring, this $10 million?

988
02:04:43.908 --> 02:04:45.470
<v Unidentified speaker>I don't know specifically on all of them.

989
02:04:45.534 --> 02:04:48.079
<v Unidentified speaker>Again, I— we can get you the details on each one.

990
02:04:48.417 --> 02:04:48.466
<v Unidentified speaker>I—.

991
02:04:49.143 --> 02:04:51.835
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, so I don't, I don't know all the details of each line item.

992
02:04:52.368 --> 02:05:01.010
<v Loretta Smith>Because this right here to me is— it is also another egregious thing that we should have known about in the spring.

993
02:05:01.211 --> 02:05:11.190
<v Loretta Smith>This high of a number, you don't just pull This out of your back pocket and say, oh, I have, I have new grants and $10 million, we got to get that out of the, um, the fall TAO.

994
02:05:12.136 --> 02:05:13.259
<v Loretta Smith>That doesn't make sense to me.

995
02:05:14.204 --> 02:05:22.604
<v Loretta Smith>It, it just— they don't even have enough time to even put out an RFP and get it back quick enough to know that they need another $10 million.

996
02:05:23.197 --> 02:05:24.880
<v Loretta Smith>They knew about this prior to.

997
02:05:25.841 --> 02:05:30.890
<v Loretta Smith>It's too early in, in the process for them to know that they have new grants.

998
02:05:30.970 --> 02:05:32.613
<v Jonas Biery>Councilwoman Smith, Yes.

999
02:05:35.573 --> 02:06:00.630
<v Loretta Smith>So I— this is, um, it's, it's difficult for me to, to buy, and it is taking up a big chunk of money, especially when they got multi-hundreds of millions of dollars in the grant fund, and you're saying it's not coming out of that grant fund It's coming out of the general fund.

1000
02:06:00.630 --> 02:06:02.560
<v Unidentified speaker>Sorry, it's not coming out of the general fund.

1001
02:06:02.569 --> 02:06:03.789
<v Unidentified speaker>It is in the grants fund.

1002
02:06:03.789 --> 02:06:10.390
<v Unidentified speaker>And apologies, I probably should have put this slide in the earlier section of the presentation, but none of this is general fund money.

1003
02:06:10.390 --> 02:06:10.869
<v Unidentified speaker>It's all grants.

1004
02:06:10.869 --> 02:06:12.460
<v Loretta Smith>So why are we trying to adjust this?

1005
02:06:13.409 --> 02:06:16.720
<v Loretta Smith>Because they've already— they already knew what they were going to do.

1006
02:06:17.329 --> 02:06:26.100
<v Jonas Biery>Well, I think, and again, we'll have— I mean, we do have, I just don't know if it's published yet, the sort of detail with each I think it's literally a line item detail of every grant.

1007
02:06:27.060 --> 02:06:35.430
<v Jonas Biery>On the new grant piece, and again, I don't have, as Ruth indicated, we don't have detail on each specific piece that's in there.

1008
02:06:35.479 --> 02:06:40.439
<v Jonas Biery>My understanding is that by and large, these are grants that we have received.

1009
02:06:40.439 --> 02:06:43.600
<v Jonas Biery>So we're receiving a new grant and we're appropriating now doing something with that grant.

1010
02:06:43.600 --> 02:06:44.060
<v Loretta Smith>That's what I asked.

1011
02:06:44.439 --> 02:06:45.960
<v Loretta Smith>These are outside monies?

1012
02:06:45.960 --> 02:06:48.890
<v Loretta Smith>And she said no, this is money that was in the grants fund.

1013
02:06:48.899 --> 02:06:51.199
<v Jonas Biery>Well, it's budgeted in the grants fund.

1014
02:06:51.229 --> 02:06:55.162
<v Jonas Biery>Fund is where we capture that reality.

1015
02:06:56.381 --> 02:07:05.947
<v Jonas Biery>And it is true that in an ideal world, we see all that ahead of time in advance so that we can just reflect it at one moment in the budget.

1016
02:07:06.509 --> 02:07:11.740
<v Jonas Biery>But often that isn't the case because we're getting things happening, you know, in real time throughout the 12-month fiscal year.

1017
02:07:12.109 --> 02:07:16.010
<v Loretta Smith>And so I want to go back to my original ordinance from last year.

1018
02:07:16.122 --> 02:07:22.242
<v Loretta Smith>I don't know if it's still good, But again, you waited 3 months.

1019
02:07:22.337 --> 02:07:28.555
<v Loretta Smith>You're supposed to— if you get new grant money in within that 15 days, you need to tell us that you got— you received it.

1020
02:07:28.603 --> 02:07:31.286
<v Loretta Smith>So when you give us this, it looks crazy.

1021
02:07:32.426 --> 02:07:34.434
<v Loretta Smith>You waited 3 months and then called the ordinance.

1022
02:07:34.595 --> 02:07:36.073
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, thank you for flagging that as well.

1023
02:07:36.362 --> 02:07:48.913
<v Jonas Biery>I believe— and I don't— I think this is in the information in the spreadsheet, but I know we had at least a conversation about tracking this as well so that we can identify in that bigger spreadsheet at what point it had been communicated.

1024
02:07:48.962 --> 02:07:51.909
<v Jonas Biery>Typically through the city administrator report would be where that happened.

1025
02:07:52.198 --> 02:07:55.420
<v Jonas Biery>I don't have that crosswalk in front of me, but yes, hear you.

1026
02:07:55.627 --> 02:08:07.134
<v Jonas Biery>We're working on making sure that we both do that reporting in alignment with that direction and that we're connecting that tissue so that we can see that transparency and transparently in these actions.

1027
02:08:07.630 --> 02:08:07.886
<v Loretta Smith>Okay.

1028
02:08:08.367 --> 02:08:08.608
<v Loretta Smith>All right.

1029
02:08:08.752 --> 02:08:09.153
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

1030
02:08:09.393 --> 02:08:10.979
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Smith.

1031
02:08:11.332 --> 02:08:12.021
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.

1032
02:08:13.015 --> 02:08:14.186
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Council President.

1033
02:08:15.005 --> 02:08:30.627
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, the Council President told me that this would be the right time to preview an amendment that I will be bringing when we hear the fall TAO in Committee of the Whole, and I wanted to make sure to do that before we get to that time next week and it comes as a surprise to anybody.

1034
02:08:31.238 --> 02:08:39.193
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So I want to speak briefly about the Community Opportunities and Enhancement Program, or COEP program, that was mentioned briefly on slide— what was that?

1035
02:08:42.609 --> 02:08:54.318
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>This is one of the programs that Ruth listed as a non-general fund decision where money is being put into the program from a self-contained fund.

1036
02:08:55.038 --> 02:08:57.604
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>This program does not touch the general fund currently.

1037
02:08:58.551 --> 02:09:08.029
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I want to start before I get into the details by thanking DCA Warren, folks in procurement and the budget office for working with us to understand what happened to co-op funding after the last budget.

1038
02:09:08.095 --> 02:09:08.350
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

1039
02:09:09.056 --> 02:09:20.530
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And importantly, to all those folks in the mayor's office for helping us to make sure that some of that was in— some of those funds were replaced in the TAO proposal that is being brought forward to council.

1040
02:09:21.172 --> 02:09:25.521
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And also to Councilor Zimmerman for his partnership on this work as we move forward.

1041
02:09:26.484 --> 02:09:28.988
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So Co+op exists for a very straightforward reason.

1042
02:09:29.051 --> 02:09:45.050
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>When the city invests billions of dollars in construction, we need to make sure that those public investments create opportunities for Portlanders who pre-apprenticeship programs, which are funded through the co-op program, are a critical part of making that happen.

1043
02:09:45.220 --> 02:09:55.829
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>They help people get the training, certifications, support, and connections that they need to have a real shot when they apply for an apprenticeship program and move into union construction careers.

1044
02:09:56.340 --> 02:10:01.380
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That's especially important in light of the commitments that the city has made through our regional work plan to workforce increase the number of apprenticeships in Portland.

1045
02:10:01.731 --> 02:10:03.255
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Equity Agreement, or our WEA.

1046
02:10:03.574 --> 02:10:08.559
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I know some of these terms are new to some folks up here, but I know there are many of you who do know about these programs.

1047
02:10:09.889 --> 02:10:27.418
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>These create a pathway into the trades for people who have historically faced barriers, and we have programs in Portland that work with Black Portlanders, that work with young people, that work with women, that work with formerly incarcerated individuals to make sure that they can enter the trades and work on these very expansive projects.

1048
02:10:28.145 --> 02:10:29.777
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

1049
02:10:32.061 --> 02:10:39.716
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Last year in the budget, we transferred the co-op program from Prosper Portland back to our city bureaus.

1050
02:10:40.622 --> 02:10:50.396
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>When we did that, there was a discussion about the necessity of that change and about the fact that the program would continue without changes when it moved back to the city.

1051
02:10:51.920 --> 02:10:53.016
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Unfortunately, that's not what happened.

1052
02:10:54.307 --> 02:10:58.725
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And the co-op program was not funded and was stalled.

1053
02:10:59.743 --> 02:11:07.890
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So I'm glad we're releasing $350,000 in co-op funding, which exists as a separate bucket within our budget in the fall TAO.

1054
02:11:08.663 --> 02:11:12.461
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I am sincerely appreciative to folks who worked with us to get that there.

1055
02:11:14.029 --> 02:11:15.963
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We were— I apologize.

1056
02:11:18.157 --> 02:11:21.574
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>In doing this, we also need to address the long-term funding stability of co-ops.

1057
02:11:21.623 --> 02:11:21.737
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

1058
02:11:22.438 --> 02:11:30.149
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And double down on the importance of these programs through the renegotiation of our WIA, which will be coming up in the next year or so.

1059
02:11:30.792 --> 02:11:36.862
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Otherwise, I fear we are going to say goodbye to the pathways that help so many Portlanders into these union apprenticeship programs.

1060
02:11:38.840 --> 02:11:50.377
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Co-op funding levels over the last 2 years were significantly elevated because of one-time construction revenues from the Bull Run project, so we knew that these these programs would be taking a financial hit.

1061
02:11:51.341 --> 02:12:09.958
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>The hit down to zero was obviously not what anybody thought was coming, and even with the addition of the $350,000, which will help to ensure that we are less likely to lose any of those programs over the coming year, those programs are still looking at a significant cut.

1062
02:12:10.680 --> 02:12:22.994
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Specifically, they were facing a total $2 million with Councilor Zimmerman, I will be bringing an amendment to further restore a portion of the cut funds to the tune of $600,000 additional.

1063
02:12:23.911 --> 02:12:29.755
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>This will get programs back to just under 50% of the funding they had previously received.

1064
02:12:30.510 --> 02:12:39.148
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Again, we're not trying to reach back to the full amount of funding because there was an artificial increase in funding because of dollars coming in through the Bull Run project.

1065
02:12:40.305 --> 02:12:43.036
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But we do need to get these programs back up to that 50% level.

1066
02:12:44.240 --> 02:12:49.510
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We wanted to flag for you all, or I wanted to flag for you all, that this amendment was coming so that it didn't come as a surprise.

1067
02:12:49.703 --> 02:13:02.764
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm happy to answer any questions over the next week about the co-op program, the importance of it, and what seems to have happened when the program was moved over, as well as the conversations that we're already having about sustainable funding.

1068
02:13:03.519 --> 02:13:14.318
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>The amendment will be pre-filed and available to the public well before the hearing next week, but I wanted to make sure you all had the time to ask questions even in advance of that as well.

1069
02:13:14.752 --> 02:13:15.090
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

1070
02:13:15.555 --> 02:13:16.539
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.

1071
02:13:17.104 --> 02:13:17.636
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Knoll.

1072
02:13:17.990 --> 02:13:19.103
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Council President.

1073
02:13:19.199 --> 02:13:21.859
<v Sameer Kanal>Councilor Pirtle-Guiney, where's the money coming from?

1074
02:13:24.000 --> 02:13:27.793
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Co-op has a separate fund.

1075
02:13:28.613 --> 02:13:32.135
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I hesitate to use the word fund because fund means different things within our budget.

1076
02:13:33.106 --> 02:13:46.092
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Co-op has a separate line item which has been funded through a surcharge on projects that are— that the city— construction projects that the city needs to construct.

1077
02:13:46.734 --> 02:13:47.887
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Using duplicative words here.

1078
02:13:49.057 --> 02:13:53.113
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>There are additional dollars in that fund that are sitting aside right now.

1079
02:13:53.243 --> 02:13:55.694
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That is where the $350,000 came from.

1080
02:13:55.807 --> 02:13:57.762
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It is where we will pull this $600,000 from.

1081
02:13:58.800 --> 02:14:00.385
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So it doesn't touch other programs.

1082
02:14:00.434 --> 02:14:08.514
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It just releases some of the money that is already set aside for these programs in the next year so that we don't lose the providers who we work with.

1083
02:14:09.060 --> 02:14:10.042
<v Sameer Kanal>Great, thank you.

1084
02:14:10.895 --> 02:14:15.399
<v Sameer Kanal>I have a question on the same slide, so that's why I jumped on it here.

1085
02:14:15.494 --> 02:14:16.588
<v Sameer Kanal>It's about the next line.

1086
02:14:19.079 --> 02:14:26.536
<v Sameer Kanal>Can you speak to— we increased the PPA Health plan.

1087
02:14:26.631 --> 02:14:37.229
<v Sameer Kanal>And then in part of last year, Councilors Smith and I put up a paired amendments, one to PPA and one to the general health plan for everybody else.

1088
02:14:37.774 --> 02:14:48.516
<v Sameer Kanal>And as part of that, we also ensured that we were funding it and there was supposed to be a little bit of extra wiggle room there, but also aware that we didn't have a ton of money in the fund.

1089
02:14:48.581 --> 02:14:48.694
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay.

1090
02:14:49.336 --> 02:15:02.104
<v Sameer Kanal>So my understanding is that that was designed to avoid this situation effectively, where we'd be taking more money out of a smaller fund to fund something that, um, was not fully funded in the first place.

1091
02:15:02.425 --> 02:15:04.287
<v Sameer Kanal>Can you just kind of square that circle for me?

1092
02:15:04.431 --> 02:15:05.685
<v Sameer Kanal>Like, what, what am I, what am I missing?

1093
02:15:05.733 --> 02:15:06.777
<v Sameer Kanal>How do we get to this point?

1094
02:15:07.900 --> 02:15:18.032
<v Unidentified speaker>I may need to phone a friend, or we might need to get back to you, um, because I don't have a ton of details on— I Yeah, I just don't have all the details.

1095
02:15:18.095 --> 02:15:24.029
<v Unidentified speaker>I mean, the baseline is what I said earlier, which is that claims came in much, much higher than forecast.

1096
02:15:24.573 --> 02:15:32.976
<v Unidentified speaker>It's not dissimilar to what happened in the LMBC fund, the main health plan fund for the rest of the city.

1097
02:15:34.114 --> 02:15:46.094
<v Unidentified speaker>The claims costs just— we have a third-party actuarial firm that provides projections for both health funds in terms of how much our expenses are forecast to be.

1098
02:15:46.381 --> 02:15:50.488
<v Unidentified speaker>And it was just, they just came in higher than that.

1099
02:15:51.514 --> 02:16:03.765
<v Unidentified speaker>But as to what you're speaking to with the amendment and the like, we can get you more details on exact numbers and where we are vis-à-vis what was expected when council adopted that.

1100
02:16:04.503 --> 02:16:05.305
<v Sameer Kanal>Great, thank you.

1101
02:16:05.707 --> 02:16:10.453
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah, I mean, obviously we wanna make sure that we're not leaving a deficit some variety here.

1102
02:16:11.014 --> 02:16:28.783
<v Sameer Kanal>And I, I just, um, I want to make sure that I understand that so that for the next time when we have this conversation, we're, uh, able to set this up for success so that we're not needing to drain a fund that— my understanding, I remember the shape of the graph— is not, um, not as at its highest level.

1103
02:16:28.863 --> 02:16:28.960
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah.

1104
02:16:29.360 --> 02:16:37.870
<v Sameer Kanal>And so we, we need to, you know, and I know, uh, CFO Biery's probably already working, if not all, um, in progress on it in, in shoring up that fund over time.

1105
02:16:38.335 --> 02:16:45.365
<v Sameer Kanal>But in terms of, um, and BHR as well, but in terms of, uh, how do we make sure that we're not taking more money out of it?

1106
02:16:45.461 --> 02:17:01.174
<v Sameer Kanal>Because I, I basically, my, my understanding is the point of the vote last time included a caveat, not only increasing to the highest, uh, of the 3 options of the PPA, um, health plan options, but also ensuring that we wouldn't need to do this.

1107
02:17:01.302 --> 02:17:03.693
<v Sameer Kanal>So that, that's just the part I'm trying to Okay.

1108
02:17:04.175 --> 02:17:04.513
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah.

1109
02:17:05.365 --> 02:17:06.893
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks, Council President.

1110
02:17:07.310 --> 02:17:08.162
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Kanal.

1111
02:17:08.902 --> 02:17:12.986
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay, that exhausts the queue of councilors.

1112
02:17:13.405 --> 02:17:14.193
<v Jamie Dunphy>Onto the next section.

1113
02:17:14.404 --> 02:17:15.594
<v Unidentified speaker>Great.

1114
02:17:17.672 --> 02:17:19.298
<v Jamie Dunphy>Am I teeing this one up?

1115
02:17:19.845 --> 02:17:21.054
<v Unidentified speaker>You can go ahead and do that.

1116
02:17:21.427 --> 02:17:21.814
<v Loretta Smith>Great.

1117
02:17:22.842 --> 02:17:23.275
<v Loretta Smith>All right.

1118
02:17:23.341 --> 02:17:23.790
<v Loretta Smith>So—.

1119
02:17:24.400 --> 02:17:29.947
<v Unidentified speaker>Sorry, there's— sorry, there's a quick slide on process improvements, and then can I pass it over to you?

1120
02:17:30.575 --> 02:17:31.217
<v Mitch Green>Absolutely.

1121
02:17:31.793 --> 02:17:44.372
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay, so this slide, before we jump into the calendar part, which is what Council President's going to speak to, we wanted to circle back on the last time we were at Council on September 10th.

1122
02:17:44.452 --> 02:17:54.274
<v Unidentified speaker>We had a conversation about budget process improvements, gathering all of the feedback that we'd heard over the prior months, and coming to you with kind of options about what could change going forward.

1123
02:17:54.468 --> 02:18:09.587
<v Unidentified speaker>So we wanted to come back to that and say, Here is what— this is an incomplete list, and I could spend much more time talking about this, but here's what we're planning to incorporate from that discussion at the work session.

1124
02:18:09.716 --> 02:18:22.529
<v Unidentified speaker>And then subsequent to the work session, I also had 2 sessions with council staff and some councilors more informally to talk specifically about budget materials and what folks wanted to see in budget materials.

1125
02:18:22.722 --> 02:18:35.880
<v Unidentified speaker>So here are the things I just wanted to highlight here, focusing— again, these focus on the things that sort of council is interested in on the public engagement and information portion of budget process.

1126
02:18:38.102 --> 02:18:50.422
<v Unidentified speaker>Within the sort of information and access theme, we're looking to improve program offers, which exist within the current budget book and in our dashboard, but could be more robust and helpful.

1127
02:18:50.823 --> 02:18:59.872
<v Unidentified speaker>And so we're adding FTE information, incorporating performance measures, and rolling decision package information up to the program offer level.

1128
02:18:59.969 --> 02:19:04.591
<v Unidentified speaker>And that's the plan for the proposed and adopted books for '27-'28.

1129
02:19:05.826 --> 02:19:25.211
<v Unidentified speaker>The second bullet there under number one is we're working on creating a budget data open data website, essentially a new website that where all of the spreadsheets can be stored and there's a proper data dictionary, and so that any member of the public could download it and figure out what it means, hopefully.

1130
02:19:25.631 --> 02:19:41.735
<v Unidentified speaker>And then the third bullet is, Council President will speak to this, work sessions on sort of what I would call base budget or what if nothing changed budget information about all of the bureaus starting in January.

1131
02:19:41.930 --> 02:19:43.645
<v Unidentified speaker>So much earlier.

1132
02:19:43.950 --> 02:19:50.363
<v Unidentified speaker>Working on increasing council information sharing and providing additional trainings and analytical support.

1133
02:19:50.684 --> 02:19:55.078
<v Unidentified speaker>And I'll be talking about that more in the coming weeks with councilors.

1134
02:19:56.458 --> 02:20:07.906
<v Unidentified speaker>In the second budget decision-making support, looking at producing the sort of a current service level complete budget with a CA budget report in February.

1135
02:20:08.100 --> 02:20:15.289
<v Unidentified speaker>And that would sort of expand again similar content to what you would hear in the work sessions in January, but in written form in February.

1136
02:20:16.202 --> 02:20:31.064
<v Unidentified speaker>And then on the budget engagement front, Laura Oppenheimer, our interim engagement officer, is going to speak more to this in a couple of slides, but essentially doing earlier engagement to gather high-level priorities well in advance of the mayor's proposed.

1137
02:20:32.331 --> 02:20:35.684
<v Unidentified speaker>So happy to have conversation about that.

1138
02:20:36.038 --> 02:20:46.647
<v Unidentified speaker>Again today, but that's kind of the shortlist of things that I wanted to bring back to you all to say, here's what we're doing, in hopes that the next year will be smoother and more transparent.

1139
02:20:47.799 --> 02:20:49.243
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay, now I can hand it to you.

1140
02:20:49.787 --> 02:20:50.764
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay, thank you very much.

1141
02:20:51.182 --> 02:20:55.861
<v Jamie Dunphy>So colleagues, I just wanted to very quickly frame up the budget calendar conversation.

1142
02:20:56.918 --> 02:21:02.095
<v Jamie Dunphy>We're going to be looking at a budget process schedule resolution that comes alongside the, the how?

1143
02:21:02.466 --> 02:21:05.820
<v Jamie Dunphy>And I want to talk in the big picture about how I'm approaching this budget schedule.

1144
02:21:06.543 --> 02:21:09.627
<v Jamie Dunphy>I will not be the council president next year, and I don't know who will be.

1145
02:21:10.477 --> 02:21:18.023
<v Jamie Dunphy>The next person may want to make a lot of changes to the budget process, and they may want to make a very few— make some very few.

1146
02:21:18.281 --> 02:21:19.004
<v Jamie Dunphy>That's not a sentence.

1147
02:21:19.566 --> 02:21:20.737
<v Jamie Dunphy>They want to make very few.

1148
02:21:21.011 --> 02:21:23.082
<v Jamie Dunphy>They may have a good idea of how they want to operate.

1149
02:21:23.403 --> 02:21:26.679
<v Jamie Dunphy>They may even be on a steep learning curve like I was.

1150
02:21:27.111 --> 02:21:30.611
<v Jamie Dunphy>The next president may not even be somebody who's currently elected to this body.

1151
02:21:31.829 --> 02:21:44.442
<v Jamie Dunphy>The main goal, my main goal, is to leave a roadmap for the next council president and for the next— or for this next council that is an iterative step forward from what we did in 2026.

1152
02:21:44.763 --> 02:21:50.427
<v Jamie Dunphy>I'm trying to offer something complete enough for the next president to follow if they want to without having to reinvent the wheel.

1153
02:21:51.183 --> 02:21:57.086
<v Jamie Dunphy>It's meant to provide the administration with enough information to plan and do their work during a leadership transition.

1154
02:21:57.745 --> 02:22:04.772
<v Jamie Dunphy>And finally, it's meant to be something that this council and the next president can change either this month or early next year.

1155
02:22:05.845 --> 02:22:09.792
<v Jamie Dunphy>This calendar is pretty close to what I shared a couple weeks ago with a couple of minor tweaks.

1156
02:22:10.514 --> 02:22:14.814
<v Jamie Dunphy>The mayor's proposed due date is set at April 20th.

1157
02:22:15.728 --> 02:22:25.911
<v Jamie Dunphy>The big new thing is the inclusion of dates for council to pre-file budget amendments for CBO review and a date with the— when those pre-filed budget amendments will be made public.

1158
02:22:26.631 --> 02:22:28.572
<v Jamie Dunphy>Both of those are voluntary deadlines.

1159
02:22:28.620 --> 02:22:34.102
<v Jamie Dunphy>The mayor's charter deadline is May 5th, and council has no hard deadline for amendments at all.

1160
02:22:34.229 --> 02:22:40.706
<v Jamie Dunphy>However, both voluntary deadlines really helped us out last year, even if both had some problems with implementation.

1161
02:22:40.817 --> 02:22:43.461
<v Jamie Dunphy>So they're both on the calendar for us to think about.

1162
02:22:44.183 --> 02:22:45.867
<v Jamie Dunphy>And again, this is a roadmap.

1163
02:22:46.171 --> 02:22:52.976
<v Jamie Dunphy>Council should feel free to change it as we work through this TAO process and to remove detail where they feel it's excessive.

1164
02:22:53.875 --> 02:22:54.823
<v Jamie Dunphy>I won't be offended.

1165
02:22:54.918 --> 02:23:04.170
<v Jamie Dunphy>This is simply a tool to try and be helpful for all of us, the 12 of us sitting up here, and for the entire administration that has to deal with whatever nonsense comes off this dais.

1166
02:23:04.251 --> 02:23:08.345
<v Jamie Dunphy>So Ruth, I'm gonna turn it back to you for the rest of this presentation.

1167
02:23:08.971 --> 02:23:09.486
<v Unidentified speaker>Great.

1168
02:23:09.549 --> 02:23:19.015
<v Unidentified speaker>So yes, so along with the TAO ordinance and the the financial policy code ordinance.

1169
02:23:19.096 --> 02:23:21.009
<v Unidentified speaker>There is a calendar resolution.

1170
02:23:21.752 --> 02:23:26.632
<v Unidentified speaker>All 3 of those are filed currently and going to be discussed at committee next week.

1171
02:23:26.698 --> 02:23:27.540
<v Unidentified speaker>So just to be clear.

1172
02:23:29.319 --> 02:23:38.656
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay, so this— the next 3 slides go through 3 months at a time, what will happen over the next 9 months, roughly speaking.

1173
02:23:39.011 --> 02:23:40.222
<v Unidentified speaker>Here we are today at the beginning.

1174
02:23:40.274 --> 02:23:40.308
<v Loretta Smith>Wow.

1175
02:23:42.018 --> 02:23:49.088
<v Unidentified speaker>So the— in October, the hope is to— sorry, one other thing to note.

1176
02:23:49.168 --> 02:23:58.315
<v Unidentified speaker>Some of the things on these slides are not on that— in the calendar resolution just because they're a little bit more internal-facing, but I thought it would be helpful to note them here.

1177
02:23:59.829 --> 02:24:07.888
<v Unidentified speaker>So the hope is to have sort of both budget— mayor's budget guidance and budget process guidance out to the bureaus by the end of this month.

1178
02:24:08.699 --> 02:24:19.250
<v Unidentified speaker>That is earlier than it has been in recent years, and I think would be a big help to getting information to you all and to the public earlier in the process.

1179
02:24:19.380 --> 02:24:20.548
<v Unidentified speaker>So that's just one thing to note.

1180
02:24:22.575 --> 02:24:33.959
<v Unidentified speaker>In November, we are sort of on a parallel track of a whole lot of technical work that has to happen in order to get the budget systems and our— and SAP ready for the next year.

1181
02:24:34.074 --> 02:24:34.647
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

1182
02:24:34.879 --> 02:24:43.442
<v Unidentified speaker>Next fiscal year's budget development, as well as beginning to develop budget options, and can talk more about how that will happen.

1183
02:24:43.507 --> 02:24:46.335
<v Unidentified speaker>But that's kind of the work for November.

1184
02:24:47.347 --> 02:24:54.352
<v Unidentified speaker>In December, we'll be coming to you all with a forecast information work session on the 9th.

1185
02:24:54.818 --> 02:25:04.763
<v Unidentified speaker>Hopefully we'll have the citywide, a new citywide revenue and expenditure forecast released 2 days before that, so that's an improvement.

1186
02:25:07.189 --> 02:25:12.890
<v Unidentified speaker>And then continuing the work on the sort of budget development in the background with that in December.

1187
02:25:14.569 --> 02:25:39.345
<v Unidentified speaker>And then looking to early in the new year, the budget calendar has those early budget committee work sessions, which are focused on sort of base budget information and, you know, the what-if-nothing-changed version of the budget for all of the bureaus.

1188
02:25:39.459 --> 02:25:48.139
<v Unidentified speaker>And there is a suggestion— suggested order in the budget calendar resolution, but again, totally up to council to change the order of that.

1189
02:25:50.040 --> 02:25:57.722
<v Unidentified speaker>At the end of January, we expect to have a budget calendar We expect bureaus to submit all of their budget information to the CA.

1190
02:25:57.963 --> 02:26:06.143
<v Unidentified speaker>That will go into the CA's budget report, and it will also begin the process of talking about how to actually balance the proposed budget.

1191
02:26:09.569 --> 02:26:18.219
<v Unidentified speaker>And then moving into February, those work sessions continue, and then the estimated date for the city administrator's budget report release yes.

1192
02:26:18.958 --> 02:26:20.805
<v Unidentified speaker>Is, uh, February 19th.

1193
02:26:22.170 --> 02:26:30.503
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, and then that, um, in the beginning of March would come before, um, council.

1194
02:26:31.563 --> 02:26:34.195
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, the date on the resolution is March 4th.

1195
02:26:34.773 --> 02:26:42.048
<v Unidentified speaker>Um, on March 10th, there is a suggested council, um, budget priorities work session.

1196
02:26:42.095 --> 02:26:49.138
<v Unidentified speaker>This is similar to what happened last year that was added into the budget calendar, but it's a bit earlier in the process.

1197
02:26:49.590 --> 02:27:00.039
<v Unidentified speaker>And so the hope is that it's— I mean, I think this timing sets it up so that the mayor can hear that feedback and still incorporate it into his proposed budget in time.

1198
02:27:02.090 --> 02:27:12.828
<v Unidentified speaker>The spring TAO also begins around the end of March, so there would be a work session that last week after spring break.

1199
02:27:14.764 --> 02:27:20.718
<v Unidentified speaker>And then we get into the thick of it, April, May, and June.

1200
02:27:20.814 --> 02:27:22.621
<v Unidentified speaker>The start of April is the spring TAO.

1201
02:27:23.574 --> 02:27:34.030
<v Unidentified speaker>Again, that timing is to maximize the amount of financial data we have available before we have to file that so that we actually have a decent forecast of what the year will look like.

1202
02:27:35.235 --> 02:27:37.040
<v Unidentified speaker>And but that also happens yes.

1203
02:27:37.412 --> 02:27:41.036
<v Unidentified speaker>You know, before the proposed is released, before things get really crazy.

1204
02:27:42.729 --> 02:27:47.079
<v Unidentified speaker>And then the mayor's proposed release would be April 20th.

1205
02:27:47.595 --> 02:28:00.128
<v Unidentified speaker>The proposed budget hearings, which are required under state budget law and include public testimony, and they're hearings because it's both the city and Prosper, would be Thursday, April 22nd.

1206
02:28:03.806 --> 02:28:09.483
<v Unidentified speaker>And then immediately the following week would be Budget Committee work sessions.

1207
02:28:10.617 --> 02:28:12.111
<v Unidentified speaker>Those work sessions would begin.

1208
02:28:13.283 --> 02:28:20.933
<v Unidentified speaker>And there again, there are some suggested topics in the calendar, but up to council to figure out how you all want to schedule those.

1209
02:28:23.551 --> 02:28:26.890
<v Unidentified speaker>Oh, sorry, the 5/5 is supposed to be the date.

1210
02:28:26.956 --> 02:28:27.718
<v Unidentified speaker>We can remove that.

1211
02:28:27.929 --> 02:28:28.075
<v Unidentified speaker>Apologies.

1212
02:28:28.208 --> 02:28:29.369
<v Angelita Morillo>Oh, apologies.

1213
02:28:29.708 --> 02:28:45.638
<v Unidentified speaker>5/11 Is the budget amendment due date to CBO, and then 5/13— sorry, some last-minute work on the slides here— it would be the public posting date.

1214
02:28:45.752 --> 02:28:48.988
<v Unidentified speaker>So essentially, the posting date would be a Thursday.

1215
02:28:49.943 --> 02:29:03.068
<v Unidentified speaker>We're asking for 2 days ahead of that to be able to do the to do the work in the background of vetting them, getting legal review when necessary and the like.

1216
02:29:03.694 --> 02:29:08.595
<v Unidentified speaker>And then Monday the 17th, the approved budget hearing would begin.

1217
02:29:08.916 --> 02:29:14.042
<v Unidentified speaker>And as again scheduled, it would be scheduled for 3 days similar to what it was this year.

1218
02:29:14.861 --> 02:29:20.100
<v Unidentified speaker>And then the June calendar is fairly prescriptive.

1219
02:29:20.197 --> 02:29:20.325
<v Unidentified speaker>Okay.

1220
02:29:20.722 --> 02:29:25.994
<v Unidentified speaker>There's a work session on the 2nd, TSCC hearing on the 8th, adopted budget first reading.

1221
02:29:26.989 --> 02:29:32.935
<v Unidentified speaker>Council President added a day there so that it would span 2 days, and then the final vote would be on the 17th.

1222
02:29:38.236 --> 02:29:38.816
<v Unidentified speaker>I know that's a lot.

1223
02:29:42.615 --> 02:29:48.378
<v Unidentified speaker>Do you want to— we can do quick questions on calendar before we turn to Communications and community engagement if you want to.

1224
02:29:49.021 --> 02:29:49.762
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think that's a good idea.

1225
02:29:50.019 --> 02:29:51.450
<v Jamie Dunphy>All right, so colleagues, anyone in the queue?

1226
02:29:51.531 --> 02:29:55.251
<v Jamie Dunphy>We're going to have, uh, questions about this section specific to the calendar.

1227
02:29:55.379 --> 02:29:56.415
<v Jamie Dunphy>Start with Councilor Connell.

1228
02:29:57.079 --> 02:29:58.261
<v Sameer Kanal>Uh, Council President, thank you.

1229
02:29:58.373 --> 02:30:03.699
<v Sameer Kanal>I had a question on the slide that actually was the queue up for it as well, and I think it's the same question.

1230
02:30:05.747 --> 02:30:08.532
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, can you go back 2 more slides, please?

1231
02:30:11.530 --> 02:30:15.725
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah, so this— it went 2 questions.

1232
02:30:15.853 --> 02:30:22.760
<v Sameer Kanal>First, can you explain what the CA budget report is as differentiated from what we got 2 years ago or a year and a half ago?

1233
02:30:24.930 --> 02:30:26.326
<v Raymond C. Lee>That hasn't been defined yet.

1234
02:30:26.487 --> 02:30:30.022
<v Raymond C. Lee>We're still going through the process to define what that CA report will look like.

1235
02:30:30.441 --> 02:30:32.529
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, well, first, thank you for including it.

1236
02:30:32.978 --> 02:30:40.568
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, I think after it happened the first time, it was probably 1 to 11 up here whether it was a good idea, but I was the one So I'm very grateful.

1237
02:30:41.420 --> 02:30:52.322
<v Sameer Kanal>So, you know, I think it gave us a lot of additional information from previous CA Jordan, and I think it really also set us up for success.

1238
02:30:52.417 --> 02:31:00.879
<v Sameer Kanal>I think combining that with the, again, replicating the earlier release date of the mayor's budget, which I'm very grateful for the mayor's proposal to do, is great.

1239
02:31:01.956 --> 02:31:04.413
<v Sameer Kanal>Have thoughts on what should be in it, happy to follow up in an email or something.

1240
02:31:04.460 --> 02:31:04.604
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

1241
02:31:05.827 --> 02:31:13.456
<v Sameer Kanal>On this slide it says budget engagement and it says conducting earlier engagement, and then 2 slides later up at the top it says mayor-led engagement.

1242
02:31:14.466 --> 02:31:16.625
<v Sameer Kanal>And I just wanted to— is that going to be in the next section?

1243
02:31:16.673 --> 02:31:17.495
<v Sameer Kanal>Are we digging into that?

1244
02:31:17.703 --> 02:31:17.897
<v Unidentified speaker>Yes.

1245
02:31:18.106 --> 02:31:18.768
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay.

1246
02:31:19.621 --> 02:31:26.318
<v Sameer Kanal>And what is the timeline on having a permanent chief city engagement officer?

1247
02:31:29.350 --> 02:31:35.177
<v Raymond C. Lee>As we concluded kind of this last presentation with council to better define what that role is.

1248
02:31:35.354 --> 02:31:45.941
<v Raymond C. Lee>I'll be sitting down with the team to kind of really clarify how we move forward in really developing a profile for the next recruitment that we'll do for this role.

1249
02:31:46.456 --> 02:31:51.764
<v Raymond C. Lee>I'm anticipating this role not to come on probably until the new year.

1250
02:31:52.519 --> 02:32:08.778
<v Raymond C. Lee>I would want to keep the work that we're doing right now and the work that Laura's doing as we get right hot and heavy with the actual budget work from an engagement standpoint so we can keep that continuity going forward, but having that process start sometime in the new year.

1251
02:32:08.986 --> 02:32:10.077
<v Sameer Kanal>That's new calendar year?

1252
02:32:10.415 --> 02:32:10.833
<v Raymond C. Lee>Correct.

1253
02:32:11.331 --> 02:32:11.893
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, thanks.

1254
02:32:12.278 --> 02:32:24.944
<v Sameer Kanal>2 years ago, as chair of the then Finance Committee, Councilor Zimmerman had come up with a plan to do engagement that had to be adapted with a new citywide engagement officer coming on at the same time.

1255
02:32:25.522 --> 02:32:41.064
<v Sameer Kanal>So I'm hoping that we can be— don't slow it down, it's good, you know— but, uh, I'm hoping that we can be in communication with everybody who's relevant to this, which obviously may change, uh, in the new year from which councilors, in a way that allows us to be involved.

1256
02:32:41.289 --> 02:32:45.085
<v Sameer Kanal>And the way in which we'll be involved, I'm sure we'll talk about in the next slide, so I can, I can leave it there.

1257
02:32:45.149 --> 02:32:54.850
<v Sameer Kanal>But, um, I'm, I'm very interested in this and ensuring that there's sort of continuity not only within the administration but in terms of planning for this specific budget engagement process.

1258
02:32:56.055 --> 02:32:56.825
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Knell.

1259
02:32:57.099 --> 02:32:57.629
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Ryan.

1260
02:32:58.047 --> 02:32:59.574
<v Dan Ryan>Yeah, thank you, Council President.

1261
02:32:59.670 --> 02:33:01.341
<v Dan Ryan>It's good to keep the process changes up.

1262
02:33:01.662 --> 02:33:04.127
<v Dan Ryan>I think I put my hand up during that section as well.

1263
02:33:04.819 --> 02:33:11.327
<v Dan Ryan>I wanted to actually say thank you for including the FTE data and also performance measures.

1264
02:33:12.337 --> 02:33:29.941
<v Dan Ryan>Our conversation earlier, was it earlier this morning, about performance measures and KPIs, So I'm happy to see that, but based on our conversation this morning, is that going to be a discipline that's realistic throughout the enterprise?

1265
02:33:31.995 --> 02:33:42.735
<v Dan Ryan>Or is it— I know when I had the opportunity to be over BDS, was permitting BDS, that culture was pretty aligned with having performance metrics.

1266
02:33:43.141 --> 02:33:46.379
<v Dan Ryan>But the other bureaus that I had an opportunity to oversee did not.

1267
02:33:46.813 --> 02:33:52.828
<v Dan Ryan>So is this something where we're moving forward and trying to get some symmetry across the city?

1268
02:33:53.599 --> 02:33:54.176
<v Raymond C. Lee>Absolutely.

1269
02:33:54.898 --> 02:33:55.299
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

1270
02:33:55.540 --> 02:33:58.172
<v Dan Ryan>And your goal is for that to be included this year?

1271
02:33:58.989 --> 02:33:59.182
<v Raymond C. Lee>Yes.

1272
02:33:59.295 --> 02:34:03.851
<v Raymond C. Lee>I know this is going to be a work in progress, and we're a continuous improvement organization.

1273
02:34:03.947 --> 02:34:09.466
<v Raymond C. Lee>So we know we're going to keep getting better with each iteration of this and each cycle of it.

1274
02:34:09.802 --> 02:34:10.604
<v Raymond C. Lee>But we have to start now.

1275
02:34:10.670 --> 02:34:10.798
<v Raymond C. Lee>Yeah.

1276
02:34:11.247 --> 02:34:11.889
<v Dan Ryan>I love that answer.

1277
02:34:12.210 --> 02:34:15.309
<v Dan Ryan>There's no such thing as best practice in my opinion.

1278
02:34:15.358 --> 02:34:17.012
<v Dan Ryan>They're just better and they keep improving.

1279
02:34:17.460 --> 02:34:28.251
<v Dan Ryan>So also when I looked at the calendar, I recall everyone having some challenges with the release of the mayor's budget and then when the amendments were due.

1280
02:34:29.326 --> 02:34:32.569
<v Dan Ryan>It still seems tight for me, but was it tighter last year than this?

1281
02:34:33.036 --> 02:34:33.308
<v Raymond C. Lee>It was.

1282
02:34:34.545 --> 02:34:35.075
<v Jonas Biery>No wonder.

1283
02:34:36.712 --> 02:34:37.852
<v Dan Ryan>But how much tighter?

1284
02:34:37.996 --> 02:34:41.547
<v Dan Ryan>'Cause was it just like, was it 6 days or 7?

1285
02:34:41.611 --> 02:34:42.301
<v Dan Ryan>Like now it's 10.

1286
02:34:43.763 --> 02:34:45.320
<v Jonas Biery>It is loosely better.

1287
02:34:45.561 --> 02:34:47.489
<v Dan Ryan>It's not dramatically better this year.

1288
02:34:47.875 --> 02:34:48.211
<v Dan Ryan>Okay.

1289
02:34:48.341 --> 02:34:48.646
<v Raymond C. Lee>But it is.

1290
02:34:49.239 --> 02:34:54.138
<v Jamie Dunphy>And I'll tell you that this is something that I think will require some iteration and some dedication from this council.

1291
02:34:54.604 --> 02:34:58.667
<v Jamie Dunphy>I also encourage all of our colleagues to file their amendments as soon as physically possible.

1292
02:34:58.716 --> 02:35:01.013
<v Jamie Dunphy>But yes, it does.

1293
02:35:01.608 --> 02:35:05.189
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, and Council President, if I can add some context.

1294
02:35:05.397 --> 02:35:11.899
<v Dan Ryan>I have a moment of clarity because this was such an item last year and I just can't tell if this is much of an improvement.

1295
02:35:11.948 --> 02:35:16.700
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, so it is, I think, maybe a couple business day improvement, which is not a lot.

1296
02:35:16.941 --> 02:35:18.096
<v Jonas Biery>Still too little.

1297
02:35:18.547 --> 02:35:23.122
<v Jonas Biery>But I think I just wanted to put it also in the broader context of all of the improvements.

1298
02:35:23.346 --> 02:35:33.843
<v Jonas Biery>And we talked about some of this on September 10th that, you know, I think we've had an unintentional kind of habit over the last couple years of kind of looking at everything at the last second.

1299
02:35:34.195 --> 02:35:57.935
<v Jonas Biery>And so there's a lot of these improvements are around getting some of that base information to you all and to the community earlier and in a more robust form so that both the mayor's proposed is better, better reflective of that input, better reflective perhaps of your input, is clearer and easier to interpret, and makes it easier for you all to develop those amendments.

1300
02:35:57.984 --> 02:35:58.224
<v Jonas Biery>So it doesn't—.

1301
02:35:58.255 --> 02:35:58.769
<v Jonas Biery>I think that's a great point.

1302
02:35:59.138 --> 02:36:01.718
<v Jonas Biery>Solve that timing challenge because we do have that.

1303
02:36:02.152 --> 02:36:18.298
<v Jonas Biery>But a major objective of all of this process change is to pull a lot of that all forward so that we can get both recognizing we're always going to have a limited timeframe, but what we can improve is the quality of information getting into that to make that shorter timeframe easier to manage.

1304
02:36:18.361 --> 02:36:24.052
<v Jonas Biery>It'll never be fun or easy, but at least better, to use your terminology, and maybe a little easier.

1305
02:36:24.213 --> 02:36:32.755
<v Dan Ryan>Well, I think the more transparent we are leading up to the mayor's proposed budget about what our interests are, that will help.

1306
02:36:34.209 --> 02:36:43.192
<v Dan Ryan>I think that some of us wait to see if our lobbying efforts paid off and we've got to see what we wanted.

1307
02:36:44.656 --> 02:36:50.679
<v Dan Ryan>But I also think it's interesting to have everything pre-baked before the mayor releases his budget.

1308
02:36:50.792 --> 02:36:53.494
<v Dan Ryan>So it's just a— it's an art form.

1309
02:36:54.298 --> 02:36:55.051
<v Dan Ryan>Yeah, thanks.

1310
02:36:56.400 --> 02:36:57.172
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Ryan.

1311
02:36:57.347 --> 02:36:57.814
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Green.

1312
02:36:58.906 --> 02:36:59.210
<v Mitch Green>Thank you.

1313
02:36:59.290 --> 02:37:05.247
<v Mitch Green>There was an earlier slide that had the timelines that I didn't necessarily see in the same format posted.

1314
02:37:05.311 --> 02:37:10.722
<v Mitch Green>Can you go back to the City Administrator's report slide?

1315
02:37:11.558 --> 02:37:11.862
<v Mitch Green>This one?

1316
02:37:12.136 --> 02:37:12.713
<v Mitch Green>Yeah, perfect.

1317
02:37:12.939 --> 02:37:13.887
<v Mitch Green>I wanted to verify the date.

1318
02:37:14.545 --> 02:37:23.569
<v Mitch Green>So for the February 19th report, do we anticipate I hope so.

1319
02:37:26.469 --> 02:37:28.969
<v Raymond C. Lee>That's the initial plan to have it within that report.

1320
02:37:28.969 --> 02:37:38.760
<v Mitch Green>Okay, I think that'd be really helpful because I think we've talked, you know, multiple times over the summer to be like, we, we definitely want to know what, what actions could happen in that next budget.

1321
02:37:39.350 --> 02:37:40.350
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks.

1322
02:37:40.350 --> 02:37:41.549
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Green.

1323
02:37:41.549 --> 02:37:42.729
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.

1324
02:37:42.729 --> 02:37:43.659
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Council President.

1325
02:37:43.770 --> 02:37:44.950
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>A question and a comment.

1326
02:37:45.615 --> 02:37:52.649
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Last year during that amendment process, council was able to work with Ruth, one of your analysts, which was incredibly helpful.

1327
02:37:52.778 --> 02:37:55.933
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We learned today that he is now in a different position at the city.

1328
02:37:56.046 --> 02:37:58.209
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think all of our offices are mourning that.

1329
02:37:59.010 --> 02:38:04.873
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Will we have somebody on your team who we are able to work with through this process in that same very hands-on detailed way?

1330
02:38:05.563 --> 02:38:11.138
<v Unidentified speaker>Yes, we're— and I'm actually coming to the heads of staff meeting next week to discuss it.

1331
02:38:11.411 --> 02:38:20.932
<v Unidentified speaker>I'm also mourning, but We are planning to fill that position, and I'll talk to your offices about collaborating on that process.

1332
02:38:21.364 --> 02:38:22.085
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Great, thank you.

1333
02:38:22.309 --> 02:38:35.135
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And just a note on this council— on this calendar, Council President, on the next page in April, the Jewish holiday of Passover begins on, I believe, April 21st.

1334
02:38:35.215 --> 02:38:40.424
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>You have on here that we are going to have a hearing on the mayor's budget on April 22nd.

1335
02:38:41.075 --> 02:38:44.507
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>The first and second nights of that holiday are major celebrations.

1336
02:38:45.087 --> 02:38:51.244
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I, for one, will likely be remote that day because I usually have 25 people at my house for the second night of Passover.

1337
02:38:52.257 --> 02:39:01.131
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>If we have Jewish members of our community, either councilors, staff, or members of the public who are expecting to be a part of this, those 2 days are not great.

1338
02:39:02.747 --> 02:39:03.168
<v Jamie Dunphy>Good flag.

1339
02:39:03.493 --> 02:39:03.799
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you.

1340
02:39:04.463 --> 02:39:05.760
<v Jamie Dunphy>We'll take a look at that.

1341
02:39:06.676 --> 02:39:07.622
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Pirtle-Guiney.

1342
02:39:08.536 --> 02:39:09.417
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Kanal.

1343
02:39:10.781 --> 02:39:11.903
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Council President.

1344
02:39:12.047 --> 02:39:17.882
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, I wanted to just follow up a little bit, if you can go to the next slide please, uh, on Councilor Ryan's questions.

1345
02:39:17.931 --> 02:39:33.994
<v Sameer Kanal>So, uh, I, I think having, um, whoop, this is— maybe I'm wrong on the slide I just saw, but, um, the idea of having, uh, 6 days, right, um, was Am I looking at the same slide we were looking at before?

1346
02:39:34.201 --> 02:39:34.411
<v Dan Ryan>Sorry.

1347
02:39:34.459 --> 02:39:39.122
<v Unidentified speaker>Sorry, I removed the 5/5 date because it was incorrectly labeled and I thought it was confusing.

1348
02:39:39.379 --> 02:39:39.877
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay, okay.

1349
02:39:40.101 --> 02:39:40.422
<v Angelita Morillo>Sorry.

1350
02:39:40.662 --> 02:39:48.341
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah, so, but what I think is, I appreciate that actually because it does show that we have from the 20th to the 11th, right?

1351
02:39:48.421 --> 02:39:48.629
<v Sameer Kanal>Correct.

1352
02:39:48.692 --> 02:39:49.431
<v Sameer Kanal>Which is significant.

1353
02:39:49.478 --> 02:39:50.087
<v Unidentified speaker>Yes, yes, yes.

1354
02:39:50.440 --> 02:39:51.353
<v Sameer Kanal>I think the—.

1355
02:39:52.316 --> 02:39:53.358
<v Sameer Kanal>Sorry.

1356
02:39:53.582 --> 02:40:03.424
<v Sameer Kanal>Which is a— and I'm not sure whether, Councilor Ryan, you meant last year as in last budget year as in A couple— 4 or 5 months ago versus last year's calendar year.

1357
02:40:03.811 --> 02:40:04.038
<v Sameer Kanal>So—.

1358
02:40:04.183 --> 02:40:06.701
<v Dan Ryan>Sorry, of course I was talking about the budget calendar.

1359
02:40:06.960 --> 02:40:15.930
<v Sameer Kanal>So obviously both what we did 4 or 5 months ago and this are, uh, by schedule much better than a year and a half ago or whatever.

1360
02:40:16.299 --> 02:40:29.736
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, I did want to mention the— that, and I, I don't mean to do this in a, in a negative way, the, the budget changed that we were amending after its initial release this year, the proposal.

1361
02:40:30.120 --> 02:40:36.738
<v Sameer Kanal>So I think that we are guaranteed 6 days by virtue of the charter, meaning you can't change it after the 5th.

1362
02:40:37.125 --> 02:40:42.408
<v Sameer Kanal>But I, I think if we're able to, to have that be locked, then it is actually a huge improvement.

1363
02:40:42.682 --> 02:40:47.581
<v Sameer Kanal>I think that that's a variable I wanted to acknowledge that, um, hopefully is being improved upon.

1364
02:40:47.646 --> 02:40:52.977
<v Sameer Kanal>And I, I think is a, you know, there's a trade-off there, obviously, but I, I, and I, I don't mistakes happen.

1365
02:40:53.025 --> 02:40:54.471
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm not trying to fault anyone.

1366
02:40:54.856 --> 02:41:00.558
<v Sameer Kanal>Also, since he's in the back of the room, I just also wanted to pile on with the thanks and mourning related to Owen moving over.

1367
02:41:00.638 --> 02:41:06.354
<v Sameer Kanal>But I know that PSSA needs good folks as well, and happy that they're going to have another good person over there.

1368
02:41:06.836 --> 02:41:07.077
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah.

1369
02:41:07.318 --> 02:41:12.505
<v Unidentified speaker>And thank you for mentioning the thing about the sort of budget accuracy.

1370
02:41:13.100 --> 02:41:21.370
<v Unidentified speaker>We are also making changes that I didn't highlight on that previous slide to lengthen the time for QA/QC prior to the mayor's proposed release.

1371
02:41:21.612 --> 02:41:36.360
<v Unidentified speaker>And so we're building that into the full calendar so that we can be more confident in the numbers once they've been released on the 20th and not have those changes that were confusing and difficult for folks to navigate.

1372
02:41:36.994 --> 02:41:37.477
<v Sameer Kanal>So great.

1373
02:41:38.397 --> 02:41:42.316
<v Sameer Kanal>Question for Council President, is this the last section for Q&A, or are there—.

1374
02:41:44.041 --> 02:41:50.640
<v Jamie Dunphy>We have one more Section after this that is going to be focused on engagement.

1375
02:41:50.915 --> 02:41:52.225
<v Jamie Dunphy>Yeah, engagement side of things still.

1376
02:41:52.434 --> 02:41:52.677
<v Raymond C. Lee>Got it.

1377
02:41:52.774 --> 02:41:56.104
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, I have questions that are not in the slides, so I'll save them for the last part.

1378
02:41:56.251 --> 02:41:56.444
<v Jamie Dunphy>Great.

1379
02:41:56.638 --> 02:41:56.897
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thanks.

1380
02:41:57.203 --> 02:41:58.368
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you very much, Councilor Kanal.

1381
02:41:58.433 --> 02:41:59.047
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Ryan.

1382
02:42:00.355 --> 02:42:05.095
<v Dan Ryan>I can wait, but I'm just going to say like 21 days is a lot different than 11, so I'm glad we caught that.

1383
02:42:05.631 --> 02:42:07.416
<v Dan Ryan>Yeah, thanks.

1384
02:42:08.537 --> 02:42:09.007
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you very much.

1385
02:42:09.202 --> 02:42:11.135
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay, let's move on to the last section.

1386
02:42:15.644 --> 02:42:17.620
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Good afternoon, everyone.

1387
02:42:18.376 --> 02:42:21.027
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Uh, for the record, my name is Laura Oppenheimer.

1388
02:42:21.123 --> 02:42:26.200
<v Laura Oppenheimer>I'm the city's Chief Communications Officer and Interim Chief Engagement Officer.

1389
02:42:26.811 --> 02:42:34.443
<v Laura Oppenheimer>I'm just going to briefly walk through a draft framework that shows an integrated plan for communications and engagement on the budget.

1390
02:42:35.005 --> 02:42:36.435
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Go ahead and next slide, please.

1391
02:42:36.549 --> 02:42:37.031
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Thank you.

1392
02:42:37.159 --> 02:42:38.522
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Thank you.

1393
02:42:39.181 --> 02:42:42.117
<v Laura Oppenheimer>I think and hope this will feel very familiar.

1394
02:42:42.422 --> 02:42:52.352
<v Laura Oppenheimer>It is responsive to what we heard from all of you during the budget process work session recently, as well as much of what we discussed during the Civic Life work session last week.

1395
02:42:53.636 --> 02:43:01.577
<v Laura Oppenheimer>This first slide, I'm just going to walk through our commitments and philosophy around budget engagement, and then we'll walk through a proposed calendar.

1396
02:43:02.363 --> 02:43:08.221
<v Laura Oppenheimer>First, we're committed to providing clear, accessible information on the challenges priorities and trade-offs.

1397
02:43:09.057 --> 02:43:16.157
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Secondly, and this is really key, you will see that each phase of engagement aligns with the budget milestones.

1398
02:43:16.271 --> 02:43:27.003
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We need to be absolutely certain that we're providing a clear purpose to each phase and that the feedback that we're requesting from community and employees is meaningful and can inform decision-making.

1399
02:43:28.158 --> 02:43:32.770
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Third, this is a lot of what we talked about in the Civic Life work session.

1400
02:43:32.817 --> 02:43:35.077
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We don't need to treat Thank you.

1401
02:43:36.049 --> 02:43:41.439
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We have a lot of great engagement practices and systems in place at the city, and we should leverage those.

1402
02:43:42.170 --> 02:43:53.356
<v Laura Oppenheimer>You'll see that the plan will include the Portland Insights survey, tapping into our community partnerships, the neighborhood system, the New Portlanders Policy Commission, and the Multnomah Youth Commission.

1403
02:43:55.002 --> 02:44:00.136
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We've heard a lot from you and from our employees that it would be really helpful to have some employee engagement.

1404
02:44:00.701 --> 02:44:06.577
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Of course, they are Portlanders, still welcome out at community events as well, but they have unique perspectives.

1405
02:44:07.889 --> 02:44:12.198
<v Laura Oppenheimer>So providing some tailored feedback opportunities is something we'd like to build in this year.

1406
02:44:14.123 --> 02:44:27.014
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We want to make sure that we circle back and close the feedback loop and let community members know how the input that we received from them influenced the budget and the decision-making process.

1407
02:44:27.078 --> 02:44:27.175
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Thank you.

1408
02:44:28.459 --> 02:44:41.292
<v Laura Oppenheimer>And then I have a feeling we're all on the same page with this one, that by planning an engagement program now, we can really improve clarity for everyone in this room, for the community, for our employees.

1409
02:44:42.111 --> 02:44:48.424
<v Laura Oppenheimer>And it will also allow us to maximize participation by planning this in advance and not having last-minute planning.

1410
02:44:48.889 --> 02:44:52.215
<v Laura Oppenheimer>So let's move on to what we're proposing.

1411
02:44:53.210 --> 02:45:00.900
<v Laura Oppenheimer>You will see that each phase does have a very explicit purpose and a format and a timing that aligns with the budget cycle.

1412
02:45:01.638 --> 02:45:13.001
<v Laura Oppenheimer>First, we want to focus on raising understanding and really kind of seeding that public conversation about the financial challenges, the economic trends, and the potential solutions on the table.

1413
02:45:13.514 --> 02:45:34.665
<v Laura Oppenheimer>That's more communications-focused, but is an opportunity to preview the engagement that will be available in 2027, which will be the reason for that timing, the week of December 7th, is to align with the economic forecast that we do have more information and can have a meaningful conversation there.

1414
02:45:36.272 --> 02:45:40.915
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Then in January, we'll be ready to roll out the results of the Portland Insights Survey.

1415
02:45:41.028 --> 02:45:46.532
<v Laura Oppenheimer>It will be— it comes out every other year, so it will be the first one that this council has received.

1416
02:45:47.677 --> 02:45:51.128
<v Laura Oppenheimer>And I really do want to emphasize, I think this has been an underutilized tool.

1417
02:45:51.240 --> 02:45:51.305
<v Raymond C. Lee>Yes.

1418
02:45:51.379 --> 02:45:51.476
<v Angelita Morillo>Yes.

1419
02:45:51.652 --> 02:46:06.786
<v Laura Oppenheimer>It's a really robust representative survey of our community, including targeted outreach toward communities who historically have been underrepresented to ensure that we can get results across districts, across demographic groups.

1420
02:46:07.265 --> 02:46:16.789
<v Laura Oppenheimer>And it asks them about their priorities for city spending, about their satisfaction with city services, about the biggest problems they see in their communities.

1421
02:46:16.980 --> 02:46:24.804
<v Laura Oppenheimer>So we will roll that out in partnership with our survey partners at Portland State University in January.

1422
02:46:25.638 --> 02:46:31.935
<v Laura Oppenheimer>The survey is just closing right now, and that should be really relevant to helping shape the rest of the budget engagement.

1423
02:46:33.155 --> 02:46:38.492
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Then utilizing that and building upon it, we would move into the values and priorities phase.

1424
02:46:38.540 --> 02:46:41.825
<v Laura Oppenheimer>This is before specific budget proposals are on the table.

1425
02:46:42.290 --> 02:46:51.667
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We're hoping that we can utilize what we've heard from that representative survey to pick themes and priorities that we would engage people more deeply in, in qualitative feedback.

1426
02:46:52.246 --> 02:46:55.811
<v Laura Oppenheimer>That's timed for following that City Administrator report.

1427
02:46:56.325 --> 02:47:02.494
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Again, want to ensure that we are sharing as much information as possible to inform the feedback that we're getting.

1428
02:47:03.810 --> 02:47:07.457
<v Laura Oppenheimer>I know there were questions around, is that the mayor's engagement?

1429
02:47:07.504 --> 02:47:09.031
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Is that the council's engagement?

1430
02:47:09.174 --> 02:47:20.319
<v Laura Oppenheimer>While a core purpose is to inform the mayor's proposed budget, I think everyone around this dais has an interest in the values and priorities and having those thank you.

1431
02:47:20.319 --> 02:47:20.319
<v Laura Oppenheimer>I think that's really important.

1432
02:47:20.319 --> 02:47:24.819
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We know that public comment is something that continues to shape the decisions made around the budget.

1433
02:47:24.819 --> 02:47:40.459
<v Laura Oppenheimer>So I think we can show up as a city and we're proposing to do those as in-district open houses as well as a digital component for those who prefer to participate that way and then employee-focused opportunities as well.

1434
02:47:40.459 --> 02:47:49.819
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We do wanna make sure that that occurs by early March to provide time for a feedback report that the mayor can really thoroughly consider in advance of decision-making around the proposed budget.

1435
02:47:50.652 --> 02:47:51.118
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Thank you.

1436
02:47:51.855 --> 02:47:53.782
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Then you see that date of April 21st.

1437
02:47:53.926 --> 02:47:56.319
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Thank you for the note around the holidays.

1438
02:47:56.897 --> 02:48:01.007
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We will certainly look at that in terms of the timing of these aspects.

1439
02:48:02.036 --> 02:48:14.061
<v Laura Oppenheimer>It's really more of a communications touchpoint and rolling out that proposed budget, but we're committed to doing so in a way that helps break it down and clearly explain the choices and trade-offs for community members and for employees.

1440
02:48:15.235 --> 02:48:15.988
<v Laura Oppenheimer>That is a really tight timeline.

1441
02:48:16.069 --> 02:48:25.046
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Great timeline then to conduct the next phase of engagement after the proposed budget is out, but before you all have to move into decision-making.

1442
02:48:25.718 --> 02:48:30.656
<v Laura Oppenheimer>You'll see we've proposed to do that in late April into early March.

1443
02:48:30.768 --> 02:48:39.534
<v Laura Oppenheimer>That's a piece where I think we'd really want Council to shape what that engagement looks like, to work closely with the Council Operations team and your new outreach coordinator there.

1444
02:48:40.786 --> 02:48:48.888
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Civic Life is here and ready to show up and support and kind kind of co-lead that engagement, but believe it, you know, ought to be council-owned.

1445
02:48:50.239 --> 02:48:52.969
<v Laura Oppenheimer>So that's the process we're mapping out.

1446
02:48:53.019 --> 02:49:01.476
<v Laura Oppenheimer>And to that point about leadership transition, at whatever point we're at in onboarding the new Chief Engagement Officer, I'm not going far.

1447
02:49:02.022 --> 02:49:05.145
<v Laura Oppenheimer>You know, we're gonna make sure that we have continuity through the process.

1448
02:49:08.858 --> 02:49:09.656
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you very much.

1449
02:49:10.052 --> 02:49:10.986
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you.

1450
02:49:11.260 --> 02:49:15.688
<v Jamie Dunphy>Colleagues, any questions, comments, concerns, short stories, or interpretive dance?

1451
02:49:15.833 --> 02:49:16.380
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Ryan.

1452
02:49:18.650 --> 02:49:19.521
<v Dan Ryan>Tempted on the last one.

1453
02:49:19.716 --> 02:49:19.941
<v Dan Ryan>Yeah.

1454
02:49:20.103 --> 02:49:21.658
<v Dan Ryan>Um, thank you, Council President.

1455
02:49:22.209 --> 02:49:32.957
<v Dan Ryan>When you talk about the values and priorities, the late February, early March, did you make it clear would be both council— well, actually council, CA, and the mayor?

1456
02:49:33.763 --> 02:49:34.871
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Yes, that is the intent.

1457
02:49:34.924 --> 02:49:38.978
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We would do one per District and go out, and councilors would be welcome to join.

1458
02:49:39.106 --> 02:49:45.279
<v Laura Oppenheimer>I know the mayor is really interested in making sure he's getting feedback from across the city to inform the proposed budget.

1459
02:49:46.641 --> 02:49:51.835
<v Laura Oppenheimer>But yes, absolutely, I think it's an opportunity for councilors to also participate alongside him.

1460
02:49:52.156 --> 02:49:54.545
<v Dan Ryan>I think it worked out really well when we were all there together.

1461
02:49:56.004 --> 02:49:58.200
<v Dan Ryan>I also have a question about economic forecast.

1462
02:49:58.247 --> 02:49:59.402
<v Dan Ryan>I know there's one in December.

1463
02:49:59.531 --> 02:50:01.934
<v Dan Ryan>Isn't there one in late April, early May?

1464
02:50:03.233 --> 02:50:10.075
<v Dan Ryan>And did that always kind of— is that the reason why the mayor's proposed would come out after you had a chance to digest that?

1465
02:50:11.565 --> 02:50:12.734
<v Unidentified speaker>Historically, yes.

1466
02:50:12.845 --> 02:50:25.022
<v Unidentified speaker>So there is a moment for a forecast update in April, and that's kind of the last minute to make a change based off of tax revenue.

1467
02:50:25.102 --> 02:50:33.361
<v Unidentified speaker>The issue with it is there's not a ton of information available until the last 2 weeks of April because of Tax Day.

1468
02:50:34.389 --> 02:50:41.409
<v Unidentified speaker>And the ability to really roll that into the proposed has always been strained, frankly.

1469
02:50:41.572 --> 02:50:45.278
<v Unidentified speaker>Even just— it's hard timing-wise.

1470
02:50:47.063 --> 02:50:52.388
<v Unidentified speaker>And so— and in the last few years, there hasn't been much of an update.

1471
02:50:52.566 --> 02:51:06.725
<v Unidentified speaker>It's been a zero update, I think, 2 years in a row, and small in prior So I think, you know, that obviously is still true that we will get additional information in April and there will still be an opportunity to update council.

1472
02:51:06.820 --> 02:51:12.022
<v Unidentified speaker>I think it will just come as a joint update to the mayor and council because it's really—.

1473
02:51:12.537 --> 02:51:15.154
<v Dan Ryan>If in fact the impact is different than has been the last few years.

1474
02:51:15.201 --> 02:51:19.682
<v Unidentified speaker>Correct, because it's really right around May 1st that there's any meaningful update.

1475
02:51:19.745 --> 02:51:24.219
<v Dan Ryan>Thanks, just jogging my memory on why that was the mayor's proposal came out later.

1476
02:51:24.369 --> 02:51:25.606
<v Dan Ryan>I think it was— all right, thanks.

1477
02:51:28.051 --> 02:51:28.790
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Ryan.

1478
02:51:28.854 --> 02:51:29.336
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Knoll.

1479
02:51:29.963 --> 02:51:30.927
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Council President.

1480
02:51:31.007 --> 02:51:37.049
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, so I mentioned a negative thing that happened 2 years ago in this space, uh, or 2 budget years ago.

1481
02:51:37.210 --> 02:51:40.126
<v Sameer Kanal>Last year, I, I agree with what Councilor Ryan was starting off with.

1482
02:51:40.190 --> 02:51:49.352
<v Sameer Kanal>I think working with the, uh, the, um, engagement officer, we were able to plan something that I think reflected, in District 2 at least, every I know your district was a little different.

1483
02:51:49.433 --> 02:51:54.163
<v Sameer Kanal>But in District 2, at least something that where we were all there together, it reflected all of our interests.

1484
02:51:54.307 --> 02:51:58.860
<v Sameer Kanal>I think I'm not speaking for Councilor Pirtle-Guiney, but I think that she agrees.

1485
02:51:59.917 --> 02:52:01.393
<v Sameer Kanal>You know, I'll give her a chance to speak.

1486
02:52:01.457 --> 02:52:04.085
<v Dan Ryan>Oh yeah, she put all the charts up and dots and yeah.

1487
02:52:04.182 --> 02:52:06.795
<v Sameer Kanal>And obviously, you know, Mayor, Administrator, they were there too.

1488
02:52:06.906 --> 02:52:11.731
<v Sameer Kanal>So I think that approach was really helpful for that in both of those 2 timeframes.

1489
02:52:11.781 --> 02:52:12.903
<v Sameer Kanal>And I really appreciate that.

1490
02:52:15.790 --> 02:52:23.754
<v Sameer Kanal>Very interested in digging in, in particular on that and the last one entirely, 'cause that is when it's more in the council wheelhouse.

1491
02:52:24.460 --> 02:52:31.316
<v Sameer Kanal>After any questions that anyone else has on engagement, I have questions on other things, so I'll just get outta the queue and hop back in.

1492
02:52:31.445 --> 02:52:31.638
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks.

1493
02:52:31.943 --> 02:52:32.313
<v Jamie Dunphy>Sounds good.

1494
02:52:32.890 --> 02:52:33.485
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Knoll.

1495
02:52:33.549 --> 02:52:34.239
<v Jamie Dunphy>Councilor Zimmerman.

1496
02:52:35.700 --> 02:52:36.134
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

1497
02:52:36.439 --> 02:52:45.506
<v Eric Zimmerman>This is the only government I've worked at where our employees are utilizing the public comment periods during the budget, and, and not in a small manner.

1498
02:52:45.650 --> 02:52:47.078
<v Eric Zimmerman>And some days they were the majority.

1499
02:52:48.459 --> 02:52:55.968
<v Eric Zimmerman>That tells me that we have an opportunity to build in an employee moment for, for public feedback or public comment.

1500
02:52:56.400 --> 02:53:02.770
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I think that actually would protect the, the nature of the, of the public comment moments.

1501
02:53:03.138 --> 02:53:14.967
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I think finding a way to, to divorce 2 from being the same thing because it has a growing trend, and I think it can actually be a more fruitful conversation if we are more deliberate and plan that out.

1502
02:53:15.031 --> 02:53:18.643
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I'm not seeing that here reflected quite, and if I've missed it, please tell me.

1503
02:53:18.722 --> 02:53:22.414
<v Eric Zimmerman>But it has grown to be such a huge trend at this point.

1504
02:53:22.718 --> 02:53:22.992
<v Eric Zimmerman>It—.

1505
02:53:23.217 --> 02:53:25.399
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think we, I think we mentioned it last year.

1506
02:53:25.463 --> 02:53:38.248
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think a few people mentioned it last year, and I think we really need to get deliberate about that because I would hope that I think that members of the public who don't have access to us all day, all the time, are able to take those slots a lot.

1507
02:53:38.313 --> 02:53:40.016
<v Eric Zimmerman>There were people who didn't get heard last year.

1508
02:53:41.737 --> 02:53:46.718
<v Eric Zimmerman>And employee feedback is clearly a very important thing because so many are showing up.

1509
02:53:46.799 --> 02:53:51.782
<v Eric Zimmerman>So let's find an opportunity in a different manner, in a different place, in a different time to have that occur.

1510
02:53:53.788 --> 02:54:04.826
<v Eric Zimmerman>Because I think that there are community conversations, public conversations about the services from and I mean this in the best way, the layperson's perspective for what they expect from the city.

1511
02:54:05.564 --> 02:54:09.666
<v Eric Zimmerman>And then there's the internal workings of an organization going through change.

1512
02:54:09.891 --> 02:54:13.851
<v Eric Zimmerman>And those conversations got quite muddied last year.

1513
02:54:14.731 --> 02:54:19.894
<v Eric Zimmerman>So I think we can be better just across the board for both audiences and both perspectives.

1514
02:54:19.941 --> 02:54:21.704
<v Eric Zimmerman>So I hope we can build that into engagement.

1515
02:54:21.769 --> 02:54:22.105
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

1516
02:54:22.730 --> 02:54:23.468
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Yeah, thank you.

1517
02:54:23.772 --> 02:54:32.483
<v Laura Oppenheimer>We did briefly note under that values and priorities phase, building in some employee-focused We have not mapped out the details of what that will look like yet.

1518
02:54:32.594 --> 02:54:44.685
<v Laura Oppenheimer>I agree that looking at some peer organizations for the defining details would be helpful, but we do think that employees will really appreciate as well having some employee-focused opportunities.

1519
02:54:44.878 --> 02:54:45.969
<v Eric Zimmerman>Let me rephrase it then.

1520
02:54:46.082 --> 02:54:48.876
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think I didn't realize that what you meant by that, that I see that line now.

1521
02:54:49.774 --> 02:54:54.254
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think that having more than one of these phases incorporate is gonna be important.

1522
02:54:55.057 --> 02:54:56.707
<v Eric Zimmerman>Given what we saw the last 2 years.

1523
02:54:56.754 --> 02:54:58.212
<v Eric Zimmerman>But I am now noting that.

1524
02:54:58.277 --> 02:55:01.337
<v Eric Zimmerman>So thank you for highlighting that one in values and priorities.

1525
02:55:01.402 --> 02:55:01.641
<v Dan Ryan>Thanks.

1526
02:55:01.962 --> 02:55:02.747
<v Laura Oppenheimer>Yeah, absolutely.

1527
02:55:02.843 --> 02:55:08.724
<v Laura Oppenheimer>And did just wanna chime in too on the aspect of shaping exactly how each of these opportunities happen.

1528
02:55:10.038 --> 02:55:12.168
<v Laura Oppenheimer>There will be ample opportunity for that.

1529
02:55:12.441 --> 02:55:17.665
<v Laura Oppenheimer>I do plan to work with all the parties involved here to get feedback on exactly how it should look.

1530
02:55:17.986 --> 02:55:31.495
<v Laura Oppenheimer>I think what we're hoping to do at this stage is get agreement on the phases the purpose of each phase so that we can kind of move on to the planning and be able to lock things in at a much earlier date and then work on the details.

1531
02:55:32.952 --> 02:55:35.261
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Zimmerman.

1532
02:55:35.789 --> 02:55:47.295
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay, colleagues, I'm going to open the queue to questions about the engagement, but also if there are any other last questions that you have about this presentation, the TAO set, even some questions about the coming budget cycle.

1533
02:55:47.793 --> 02:55:48.727
<v Jamie Dunphy>So Councilor Kanal.

1534
02:55:49.950 --> 02:55:50.225
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

1535
02:55:52.156 --> 02:55:57.083
<v Sameer Kanal>So there are a lot of questions I have around specific decision packages.

1536
02:55:57.130 --> 02:56:06.253
<v Sameer Kanal>I think the ones that I think are worth getting into here, there's one about, it's 28495 on the Portland Tennis Center.

1537
02:56:07.059 --> 02:56:12.707
<v Sameer Kanal>The other one is 28401 on the shelter program encumbrance carryover.

1538
02:56:13.387 --> 02:56:16.968
<v Sameer Kanal>And a third one is $28,580 on the convention tourism fund balance true-up.

1539
02:56:17.416 --> 02:56:21.719
<v Sameer Kanal>I think the convention tourism one is maybe illustrative of some other things.

1540
02:56:22.154 --> 02:56:26.809
<v Sameer Kanal>This one effectively shows that we had extra money, that there was unspent dollars last year.

1541
02:56:26.873 --> 02:56:32.316
<v Sameer Kanal>We're carrying it over as beginning fund balance, but then it says it's putting it into external materials and services.

1542
02:56:32.895 --> 02:56:35.639
<v Sameer Kanal>And I'm curious, there's no detail on that.

1543
02:56:36.025 --> 02:56:47.108
<v Unidentified speaker>How would one find out what the expected Uh, we would have to ask them and provide more information in the decision package, so I will do that and we can update it.

1544
02:56:47.784 --> 02:56:52.427
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, uh, I have a few others that are kind of in this space too, so I'll just give the full list to you, uh, offline.

1545
02:56:53.009 --> 02:57:07.130
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, the question I have on 28401, yeah, um, which is a shelter program encumbrance carryover, is less about the carryover and more about the, uh, It's the beginning of service impacts.

1546
02:57:07.194 --> 02:57:09.215
<v Sameer Kanal>It's the very beginning of page 16 of that.

1547
02:57:09.680 --> 02:57:16.620
<v Sameer Kanal>The shelter program's approved and planned budget for fiscal year '26-'27 relies on this $2.76 million carryover.

1548
02:57:17.453 --> 02:57:28.000
<v Sameer Kanal>And my question is, isn't that the exact thing we were trying to avoid last year is building— and even earlier today on the fireside, but at least there was detail in the budget.

1549
02:57:28.111 --> 02:57:33.096
<v Sameer Kanal>But the idea that it was— that we were not building around an expectation of a carryover.

1550
02:57:33.161 --> 02:57:33.209
<v Sameer Kanal>Yes.

1551
02:57:33.879 --> 02:57:36.521
<v Sameer Kanal>So can I get some more information on this one and what happened there?

1552
02:57:38.649 --> 02:57:48.231
<v Unidentified speaker>Yeah, I think probably— I mean, I don't know if you want to do it right now, but I think probably will be easiest to have the Portland Solutions staff respond to that.

1553
02:57:48.424 --> 02:57:51.108
<v Unidentified speaker>But I don't know if you want to do that now, if they're still in the room or not.

1554
02:57:51.381 --> 02:58:03.774
<v Sameer Kanal>This is less a programmatic question and more— didn't— wasn't the idea behind the budget we voted on that the deliverables in the budget we voted on and the money that was in the budget we were voting on yes.

1555
02:58:04.433 --> 02:58:13.762
<v Jonas Biery>Yeah, and I would just say you're absolutely right, Councilor, um, um, that philosophically that is the intent and the norm.

1556
02:58:14.549 --> 02:58:30.829
<v Jonas Biery>Um, I think this is a circumstance, and again, I think once we have time to have a little more dialogue about it, there's sort of unique elements of this request related to transfer of funds multi-jurisdictionally, etc., that made that ideal norm a little more challenging.

1557
02:58:30.941 --> 02:58:37.781
<v Jonas Biery>So I wanted to acknowledge that you're right, that is the intent, and also true that sometimes that isn't 100% possible.

1558
02:58:38.247 --> 02:58:40.352
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, and then I'll follow up on the programmatic side.

1559
02:58:40.399 --> 02:58:47.656
<v Sameer Kanal>I guess the big picture is the more we can do to not make Portland Solutions an exception to every rule, the better we will be.

1560
02:58:47.961 --> 02:58:58.608
<v Sameer Kanal>And I'm looking forward to it either being the 5th service area or part of a service area, but not this thing that exists last question.

1561
02:59:00.078 --> 02:59:01.356
<v Sameer Kanal>Portland Tennis Center funding request.

1562
02:59:03.983 --> 02:59:19.452
<v Sameer Kanal>I find it challenging to even wrestle with the idea that we're supposed to vote on something related to putting money into sidewalk repairs that relate to it when we were originally told in the budget process that we were going to vote on whether or not to transfer it over in the first place.

1563
02:59:19.501 --> 02:59:19.920
<v Sameer Kanal>I think that's a fair point.

1564
02:59:20.059 --> 02:59:29.260
<v Sameer Kanal>First place, and now we're being asked because of a request that came in from the chosen partner, which we had no influence over, to, to do this.

1565
02:59:29.789 --> 02:59:35.923
<v Sameer Kanal>And then it's also talking about access to something that, as far as we know, is going to get closed off to the public at some point.

1566
02:59:36.629 --> 02:59:44.255
<v Sameer Kanal>So we have— I mean, we have no information, at least I've been given none despite asking, on what has even happened.

1567
02:59:44.656 --> 02:59:52.497
<v Sameer Kanal>This was signed, you know, Um, during our council recess after we were promised that it was going to be brought back to council.

1568
02:59:53.092 --> 02:59:56.698
<v Sameer Kanal>So I'm, I'm just big picture trying to understand what is going on with this one.

1569
02:59:57.548 --> 03:00:04.233
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, and sort of the legal framework as well about like, we budgeted for something where it would come back to us.

1570
03:00:04.313 --> 03:00:05.915
<v Sameer Kanal>It was in the, the conversation.

1571
03:00:05.979 --> 03:00:07.359
<v Sameer Kanal>I run the transcripts.

1572
03:00:07.406 --> 03:00:08.945
<v Sameer Kanal>I've read them out loud several times up here.

1573
03:00:09.010 --> 03:00:15.631
<v Sameer Kanal>I won't do it again about won't we have a chance to weigh in on whether or not we're privatizing this thing.

1574
03:00:17.492 --> 03:00:31.450
<v Sameer Kanal>And then we're told we would, got privatized, private partner is now asking for $200,000 to be spent for something, and we don't even know if Portlanders are going to be allowed into this thing for free or not or how that's going to work.

1575
03:00:31.869 --> 03:00:36.903
<v Sameer Kanal>So can I— I think this is more of a programmatic question and a legal question than for the folks sitting up here.

1576
03:00:37.361 --> 03:00:45.894
<v Sameer Kanal>But can we get some information on what exactly is going on and, and even just the basic guarantee that access will remain open to the City of Portland's residents?

1577
03:00:46.216 --> 03:00:47.556
<v Sameer Kanal>Because we don't even have that right now.

1578
03:00:50.486 --> 03:00:52.431
<v Raymond C. Lee>Yeah, we'll follow up on you on that, Councilor.

1579
03:00:52.495 --> 03:00:54.199
<v Raymond C. Lee>I'll make sure I follow up personally on that.

1580
03:00:54.520 --> 03:00:55.259
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

1581
03:00:56.030 --> 03:01:00.824
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, and I'll follow up as well with Parks on just the very specific stuff, but I thank you for the big picture.

1582
03:01:02.509 --> 03:01:03.263
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Kanal.

1583
03:01:03.379 --> 03:01:07.049
<v Jamie Dunphy>Well, colleagues, any further questions, conversations, comments?

1584
03:01:12.611 --> 03:01:13.611
<v Jamie Dunphy>If you got another question.

1585
03:01:15.863 --> 03:01:19.859
<v Sameer Kanal>Uh, say, question on the HomeShare pilot carryover.

1586
03:01:20.636 --> 03:01:22.350
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, what happened here?

1587
03:01:22.818 --> 03:01:30.278
<v Sameer Kanal>Uh, because this one we budgeted $500,000 and $471,000 is currently a request for, for being carried over.

1588
03:01:32.345 --> 03:01:36.299
<v Sameer Kanal>I know this is a priority for you, Mayor, and I appreciate you being here and being able to answer this.

1589
03:01:36.412 --> 03:01:44.478
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm not sure if it is your question or administrator or somebody else, but what wasn't— why did it not get all spent this year is really my question.

1590
03:01:46.488 --> 03:01:47.291
<v Unidentified speaker>I'll take the first shot.

1591
03:01:47.355 --> 03:01:51.422
<v Jonas Biery>It's a pilot, so the pilot's being rolled out and it's picking up steam.

1592
03:01:52.079 --> 03:01:56.263
<v Jonas Biery>But as far as the encumbrance carryover, it's just taking the funds and still isolating in that program.

1593
03:01:56.952 --> 03:02:02.372
<v Jonas Biery>That's being advertised and we're accepting applications and we're expanding the providers.

1594
03:02:03.352 --> 03:02:06.495
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, so it's a ramp-up to the—.

1595
03:02:06.495 --> 03:02:06.896
<v Sameer Kanal>Right.

1596
03:02:07.136 --> 03:02:09.510
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, appreciate that clarification.

1597
03:02:09.558 --> 03:02:13.390
<v Sameer Kanal>I'll follow up with the rest offline, but thank you, Council President.

1598
03:02:13.550 --> 03:02:14.400
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, Councilor Kanal.

1599
03:02:15.171 --> 03:02:18.442
<v Jamie Dunphy>All right, we have reached the conclusion of our work session.

1600
03:02:18.522 --> 03:02:22.274
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you all so much for this first conversation about the next budget cycle.

1601
03:02:22.371 --> 03:02:23.756
<v Jamie Dunphy>It's always budget season here.

1602
03:02:24.449 --> 03:02:37.074
<v Jamie Dunphy>Um, as promised, colleagues, the next big conversation and opportunity for us to actually meddle with the TAO is going to be at the Committee of the Whole, in which we can actually have conversations about any potential amendments, as we heard Councilor Pirtle-Guiney and potentially others.

1603
03:02:37.734 --> 03:02:41.034
<v Jamie Dunphy>With that, I am adjourning this work session of the Portland City Council.

1604
03:02:41.100 --> 03:02:41.422
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you.

1605
03:02:46.916 --> 03:02:47.496
<v Angelita Morillo>Thank you.

