WEBVTT

1
00:07:12.680 --> 00:07:13.718
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Good afternoon.

2
00:07:13.815 --> 00:07:14.173
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Good morning.

3
00:07:14.384 --> 00:07:14.935
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Good morning.

4
00:07:15.048 --> 00:07:24.747
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It is 10:33 on Wednesday, August I am calling to order a special meeting of the Portland City Council.

5
00:07:26.338 --> 00:07:28.050
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, Rebecca, could you please call the roll?

6
00:07:29.374 --> 00:07:29.922
<v Rebecca Dobert>Koyama Lane?

7
00:07:30.762 --> 00:07:31.084
<v Loretta Smith>Here.

8
00:07:31.649 --> 00:07:32.117
<v Rebecca Dobert>Morillo?

9
00:07:33.101 --> 00:07:33.279
<v Angelita Morillo>Here.

10
00:07:33.990 --> 00:07:34.473
<v Rebecca Dobert>Novick?

11
00:07:34.781 --> 00:07:34.894
<v Loretta Smith>Here.

12
00:07:35.329 --> 00:07:35.586
<v Rebecca Dobert>Clark?

13
00:07:35.682 --> 00:07:35.860
<v Loretta Smith>Here.

14
00:07:36.165 --> 00:07:36.454
<v Rebecca Dobert>Green?

15
00:07:37.129 --> 00:07:37.242
<v Dan Ryan>Here.

16
00:07:37.627 --> 00:07:38.045
<v Rebecca Dobert>Zimmerman?

17
00:07:38.319 --> 00:07:38.415
<v Eric Zimmerman>Here.

18
00:07:38.961 --> 00:07:39.266
<v Olivia Clark>Avalos?

19
00:07:39.620 --> 00:07:39.942
<v Nancy Thorington>Present.

20
00:07:40.408 --> 00:07:40.826
<v Rebecca Dobert>Dunphy?

21
00:07:40.987 --> 00:07:41.163
<v Nancy Thorington>Here.

22
00:07:41.485 --> 00:07:41.838
<v Rebecca Dobert>Smith?

23
00:07:42.675 --> 00:07:42.786
<v Loretta Smith>Here.

24
00:07:43.461 --> 00:07:43.767
<v Rebecca Dobert>Ryan?

25
00:07:44.259 --> 00:07:44.324
<v Loretta Smith>Here.

26
00:07:44.845 --> 00:07:45.398
<v Rebecca Dobert>Pirtle-Guiney.

27
00:07:45.838 --> 00:07:45.951
<v Angelita Morillo>Here.

28
00:07:47.221 --> 00:07:47.692
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

29
00:07:47.855 --> 00:07:48.423
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm here too.

30
00:07:52.709 --> 00:07:53.713
<v Rebecca Dobert>Apologies, I didn't hear that.

31
00:07:53.795 --> 00:07:54.119
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you.

32
00:07:54.346 --> 00:07:55.173
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thanks.

33
00:07:56.372 --> 00:08:00.487
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, could we please have our attorney go over the rules of order and decorum?

34
00:08:02.519 --> 00:08:04.158
<v Nancy Thorington>Welcome to the Portland City Council.

35
00:08:04.223 --> 00:08:10.766
<v Nancy Thorington>To testify before council in person or virtually, you must sign up in advance on the council agenda at www.portlandoregistration.org.

36
00:08:15.004 --> 00:08:15.908
<v Nancy Thorington>W.portland.gov/council/agenda.

37
00:08:15.958 --> 00:08:18.819
<v Nancy Thorington>Information on engaging with council can be found on the council clerk's webpage.

38
00:08:19.562 --> 00:08:23.586
<v Nancy Thorington>Individuals may testify for 3 minutes unless the presiding officer states otherwise.

39
00:08:24.088 --> 00:08:26.285
<v Nancy Thorington>Your microphone will be muted when your time is over.

40
00:08:26.915 --> 00:08:28.529
<v Nancy Thorington>The presiding officer preserves order.

41
00:08:28.869 --> 00:08:38.217
<v Nancy Thorington>Disruptive conduct such as shouting, refusing to conclude your testimony when your time is up, or interrupting other testimony or council deliberations will not be allowed.

42
00:08:39.057 --> 00:08:41.205
<v Nancy Thorington>If you cause a disruption, a warning will be given.

43
00:08:41.638 --> 00:08:44.171
<v Nancy Thorington>Further disruption will result in ejection from the meeting.

44
00:08:44.764 --> 00:08:48.980
<v Nancy Thorington>Anyone who fails to leave once ejected is subject to arrest for trespass.

45
00:08:49.509 --> 00:08:52.986
<v Nancy Thorington>Additionally, council may take a short recess and reconvene virtually.

46
00:08:53.659 --> 00:08:56.450
<v Nancy Thorington>Your testimony should address the matter being considered.

47
00:08:56.865 --> 00:08:59.479
<v Nancy Thorington>When testifying, 1, state your name for the record.

48
00:08:59.816 --> 00:09:01.322
<v Nancy Thorington>Your address is not necessary.

49
00:09:01.740 --> 00:09:04.961
<v Nancy Thorington>2, If you are a lobbyist, identify the organization you represent.

50
00:09:05.458 --> 00:09:09.866
<v Nancy Thorington>3, Virtual testifiers should unmute themselves when the council clerk calls your name.

51
00:09:10.010 --> 00:09:10.106
<v Nancy Thorington>Thank you.

52
00:09:10.557 --> 00:09:11.793
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

53
00:09:12.740 --> 00:09:15.116
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you very much, colleagues.

54
00:09:15.229 --> 00:09:30.195
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have 2 items on the agenda today, and we are adjourning our meeting in about 3 hours, but then we'll reconvene tomorrow at 2:30 if we have not concluded the business that we have before us.

55
00:09:30.884 --> 00:09:41.557
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Before we open up those 2 items though for public testimony and discussion, I'd like to just take a moment for something not on the agenda.

56
00:09:42.535 --> 00:09:44.250
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Do we need to approve today's agenda first?

57
00:09:45.325 --> 00:09:45.950
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Am I skipping this?

58
00:09:46.029 --> 00:09:47.585
<v Rebecca Dobert>Yes, item 1 is agenda approval.

59
00:09:47.712 --> 00:09:49.461
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, I apologize, colleagues.

60
00:09:49.716 --> 00:09:51.320
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Item 1 is approving the agenda.

61
00:09:51.961 --> 00:09:56.850
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Actually, before we do that though, I'll do this before we go to approving the agenda.

62
00:09:57.652 --> 00:10:07.269
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I just wanna take a moment because we had a new staff person start, our Council Operations Manager, Dana Richardson, on Monday.

63
00:10:07.365 --> 00:10:20.558
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I know some of you have had an opportunity to meet with her I think for some folks that's coming later this week still, but I just wanted to give Dana an opportunity to introduce herself in this setting.

64
00:10:21.874 --> 00:10:29.856
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>For folks watching or in the audience today, Council Operations is the group that does a lot of the support, especially for our committee meetings.

65
00:10:30.673 --> 00:10:41.365
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And we had an interim manager when we started who was here on a limited duration, intentionally came out of retirement to work with us short-term.

66
00:10:41.429 --> 00:10:41.687
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So Dana, welcome.

67
00:10:41.767 --> 00:10:41.927
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

68
00:10:42.039 --> 00:10:42.183
<v Angelita Morillo>Thank you.

69
00:10:42.231 --> 00:10:44.972
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Dana is our first permanent Council Operations Manager.

70
00:10:45.100 --> 00:11:07.527
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We are very glad to have her, and I wanted to make sure we had an opportunity again for folks on Council who hadn't had an opportunity yet to meet Dana, to get to hear a little bit from you, and also for the public who are watching to just know who you are, given that you do, and your team will— your team does, and you will do so much support for the work that we do, but often behind the scenes.

71
00:11:07.654 --> 00:11:08.697
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So please go ahead.

72
00:11:09.001 --> 00:11:13.618
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you for this opportunity, uh, Madam President, uh, Madam Vice President, and councilors.

73
00:11:14.195 --> 00:11:25.303
<v Rebecca Dobert>As the president mentioned, this is my 3rd day on the job as the Council Operations Manager, and I'm pleased to be here and eager to learn how my team can support this council in its success.

74
00:11:26.138 --> 00:11:35.355
<v Rebecca Dobert>As you probably know, I lead a team of 10 folks that are here for policy development and analysis, whether that's in your committees, in your districts.

75
00:11:35.532 --> 00:11:38.929
<v Rebecca Dobert>We have capacity in communications and coordination as well.

76
00:11:39.682 --> 00:11:40.708
<v Rebecca Dobert>So our brand is really simple.

77
00:11:41.126 --> 00:11:46.312
<v Rebecca Dobert>We're here to work for you, each of you as councilors, as the councilor— as the council as a whole.

78
00:11:47.083 --> 00:11:48.929
<v Rebecca Dobert>And I'm really privileged to be here today.

79
00:11:49.653 --> 00:11:53.024
<v Rebecca Dobert>And I told— I was told y'all will go easy on me, at least for now.

80
00:11:54.373 --> 00:11:56.798
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Perfect.

81
00:11:57.102 --> 00:12:01.357
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you so much, um, and welcome.

82
00:12:01.792 --> 00:12:07.111
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think this is the first time that we've gotten the opportunity to, to have you here.

83
00:12:07.225 --> 00:12:12.871
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm not sure if you were watching the committees earlier this week, but welcome and thank you for being here and being part of the team.

84
00:12:13.129 --> 00:12:13.470
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you.

85
00:12:13.600 --> 00:12:17.163
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Good luck.

86
00:12:17.259 --> 00:12:21.355
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, colleagues, the first item on our agenda is agenda approval.

87
00:12:22.232 --> 00:12:27.744
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>There has not been anything taken off the agenda or any requests to reorder the agenda.

88
00:12:28.067 --> 00:12:30.644
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Do we have unanimous consent for agenda approval?

89
00:12:34.182 --> 00:12:52.386
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, as we move into our agenda today, we have 2 items, um, adopting an ordinance on our council meeting schedule and a resolution establishing a new council committee structure.

90
00:12:52.885 --> 00:12:59.404
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Both of these items have been discussed by the full council in work sessions, but this is the first opportunity we'll have for public testimony.

91
00:13:00.164 --> 00:13:16.360
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'd like to open up, Rebecca, both items together so that if folks who are signed up to testify are interested in testifying on pieces of both, they can do that just one time and make sure to have a little bit more consistency amongst remarks there.

92
00:13:16.668 --> 00:13:18.464
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Would you please open items 2 and 3?

93
00:13:19.346 --> 00:13:26.980
<v Rebecca Dobert>Item 2, adopt council regular meeting schedule pursuant to code subsection 3.02.010.C.1.

94
00:13:28.094 --> 00:13:31.225
<v Rebecca Dobert>Item 3, establish new city council committee structure.

95
00:13:32.453 --> 00:13:33.000
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

96
00:13:34.283 --> 00:13:44.130
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And colleagues, we don't have our normal introductory overviews on these items because they were heard in work sessions.

97
00:13:44.259 --> 00:13:51.028
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So if there are not questions before we begin, I'd like to move us straight into public testimony.

98
00:13:51.621 --> 00:13:59.160
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But if there are any clarifying questions or amendments that haven't been filed that folks would like to share before we do so, now would be the time.

99
00:14:00.524 --> 00:14:01.214
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal.

100
00:14:01.886 --> 00:14:02.913
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Madam President.

101
00:14:03.234 --> 00:14:09.519
<v Sameer Kanal>I just wanted to make sure that potential testifiers were aware I had pre-filed an amendment and I'll officially move it here.

102
00:14:09.727 --> 00:14:18.691
<v Sameer Kanal>It's filed as Kanal 1 to the adopt council regular meeting schedule and it's a package that is based off of the feedback heard at the work session.

103
00:14:19.524 --> 00:14:19.750
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

104
00:14:20.407 --> 00:14:21.129
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

105
00:14:21.208 --> 00:14:25.313
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And colleagues, if you haven't had a chance to look at that, that has been filed.

106
00:14:25.361 --> 00:14:26.965
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It's been up for about a week.

107
00:14:27.285 --> 00:14:33.355
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I know we had some discussion that was straightforward and everyone was on the same page and some where there were some divisions.

108
00:14:33.403 --> 00:14:38.509
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think Councilor Knoll tried to capture the things where it was mostly straightforward and folks were on the same page.

109
00:14:38.942 --> 00:14:39.264
<v Dan Ryan>Correct.

110
00:14:39.327 --> 00:14:39.585
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

111
00:14:39.971 --> 00:14:40.147
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

112
00:14:40.388 --> 00:14:41.110
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

113
00:14:42.475 --> 00:14:43.086
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Smith.

114
00:14:43.679 --> 00:14:44.210
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

115
00:14:44.803 --> 00:14:47.389
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you, Madam President.

116
00:14:48.014 --> 00:14:58.062
<v Loretta Smith>I did want to add an amendment that would include having Wednesday meetings and on the 3rd Wednesday having only one night meeting.

117
00:14:58.500 --> 00:15:01.591
<v Loretta Smith>So would I do that here or would I do that after?

118
00:15:01.802 --> 00:15:03.270
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>You could absolutely do that now.

119
00:15:03.351 --> 00:15:09.244
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So that would be a floor amendment, and I'm trying to skim through this to see where that would go.

120
00:15:09.307 --> 00:15:18.298
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I believe that would be in the first, therefore, A2, where it says on the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of each month at 6:00 PM.

121
00:15:19.256 --> 00:15:20.731
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And you would amend?

122
00:15:20.956 --> 00:15:28.457
<v Loretta Smith>And I would amend that to have all meetings on Wednesdays, and on the 3rd Wednesday we have a night meeting so that we don't have to have 2 night meetings.

123
00:15:29.226 --> 00:15:31.294
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So this— I'm sorry, go ahead.

124
00:15:31.392 --> 00:15:32.256
<v Dan Ryan>Oh, I was seconding that.

125
00:15:32.417 --> 00:15:33.027
<v Dan Ryan>Is that a motion?

126
00:15:33.539 --> 00:15:35.158
<v Loretta Smith>It's not.

127
00:15:35.287 --> 00:15:36.616
<v Loretta Smith>I haven't— I did it from the floor.

128
00:15:37.291 --> 00:15:41.746
<v Candace Avalos>No, I know, but where were you just— Council President, you were saying— you were suggesting it could go somewhere.

129
00:15:41.794 --> 00:15:42.323
<v Candace Avalos>Where were you saying?

130
00:15:42.419 --> 00:15:53.520
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>On page 2 of— and I'm, I'm sorry, I'm working off of Councilor Kanal's proposed amendment right now rather than the original, but on Page 2 of Councilor Kanal's proposed amendment.

131
00:15:54.070 --> 00:15:58.366
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Now therefore, the council directs, A, council meetings will occur.

132
00:16:00.015 --> 00:16:16.263
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I believe, Councilor Smith, 1 would say on each Wednesday of the month at 9:30 with a recessed meeting, and then 2 would say on the 3rd Wednesday of each month.

133
00:16:16.311 --> 00:16:16.375
<v Rebecca Dobert>Yes.

134
00:16:17.681 --> 00:16:20.037
<v Loretta Smith>We have 2 meetings, one in the morning, one at night.

135
00:16:22.350 --> 00:16:25.629
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So you're not proposing a 9:30 and a 6:00 PM on that 3rd Wednesday?

136
00:16:25.740 --> 00:16:26.496
<v Loretta Smith>Yes, I am.

137
00:16:26.561 --> 00:16:27.493
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>You are proposing both?

138
00:16:27.686 --> 00:16:27.846
<v Olivia Clark>Both.

139
00:16:27.894 --> 00:16:29.903
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That every Wednesday we have a 9:30 and—.

140
00:16:29.952 --> 00:16:31.865
<v Loretta Smith>Not every Wednesday, but the 3rd Wednesday.

141
00:16:33.149 --> 00:16:40.749
<v Loretta Smith>Every Wednesday we have a, a, a city council meeting, and then on the 3rd Wednesday we have a night meeting as well as a day meeting.

142
00:16:42.429 --> 00:16:55.567
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So the resolution would read every Wednesday a 9:30 meeting, the recessed session at 2:00 PM on Wednesday or 2:00 PM on Thursday, and a 6:00 PM meeting on the 3rd Wednesday of each month.

143
00:16:55.714 --> 00:16:56.119
<v Loretta Smith>Correct.

144
00:16:56.765 --> 00:16:59.486
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Rebecca, are you capturing that or do you want somebody to send this to you?

145
00:17:01.677 --> 00:17:02.802
<v Rebecca Dobert>We do need the language sent.

146
00:17:03.364 --> 00:17:05.002
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, we'll work on that.

147
00:17:05.067 --> 00:17:05.228
<v Angelita Morillo>Okay.

148
00:17:05.452 --> 00:17:08.087
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So that's been seconded by Councilor Ryan.

149
00:17:08.424 --> 00:17:11.887
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I apologize, I don't think I heard a second to Councilor Kanal's original amendment that is here.

150
00:17:18.509 --> 00:17:18.758
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Second.

151
00:17:19.287 --> 00:17:20.164
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor Green.

152
00:17:24.200 --> 00:17:30.285
<v Candace Avalos>I guess I'm trying to understand, are we— because Councilor Kanal's is an amendment, so are we adding another amendment?

153
00:17:30.430 --> 00:17:30.734
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Correct.

154
00:17:30.847 --> 00:17:33.117
<v Candace Avalos>So are we now in Councilor Smith's amendment?

155
00:17:33.568 --> 00:17:40.915
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We are not in debate right now, but folks are putting amendments on the floor so that our testifiers know what the options are that they're responding to.

156
00:17:40.980 --> 00:17:41.077
<v Loretta Smith>Got it.

157
00:17:41.438 --> 00:17:45.378
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is there anything related?

158
00:17:48.596 --> 00:17:58.304
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have not had a consistent practice of having to offer amendments, but it is something that we have sometimes done in order to allow folks to know what is under consideration.

159
00:17:58.994 --> 00:18:10.294
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'll note that there are 2 amendments filed on the council committee structure as well, one by Councilor Dunphy and one by me.

160
00:18:10.358 --> 00:18:14.700
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We'll talk about those more when we get to that discussion.

161
00:18:14.814 --> 00:18:18.249
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But for folks who are testifying, I would assume that those are both in play as well.

162
00:18:20.160 --> 00:18:22.420
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I feel like— did you have something to add, Councilor Caramelline?

163
00:18:24.549 --> 00:18:48.338
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Yes, I also will be bringing a floor amendment that I just finished today, and we'll print— I printed out for everyone around making— as we are looking to have weekly council meetings currently, it takes— can take up to 3 months for an item to be placed on the full council agenda.

164
00:18:49.048 --> 00:18:57.315
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I am looking to make an amendment to change that to 45 days as we will be meeting twice as frequently.

165
00:18:58.853 --> 00:18:59.013
<v Steve Novick>Okay.

166
00:18:59.416 --> 00:19:00.287
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

167
00:19:01.833 --> 00:19:04.555
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And that's a floor amendment, but it looks like you have it on paper.

168
00:19:04.635 --> 00:19:06.198
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Can you make sure that the clerk's team has it?

169
00:19:06.407 --> 00:19:06.730
<v Olivia Clark>Absolutely.

170
00:19:07.132 --> 00:19:07.471
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

171
00:19:08.436 --> 00:19:09.255
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Morillo.

172
00:19:10.442 --> 00:19:12.623
<v Angelita Morillo>Yeah, I just wanted to request—.

173
00:19:12.623 --> 00:19:14.018
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Morillo.

174
00:19:14.386 --> 00:19:15.574
<v Angelita Morillo>Can you hear me?

175
00:19:16.070 --> 00:19:17.289
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Yeah, can you pause for one minute?

176
00:19:17.417 --> 00:19:20.786
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Was there a second to Councilor Koyama Lane's amendment?

177
00:19:21.027 --> 00:19:22.470
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And if not, we can do that later.

178
00:19:22.645 --> 00:19:23.608
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, I hear a second.

179
00:19:24.089 --> 00:19:25.211
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Morillo, go right ahead.

180
00:19:25.276 --> 00:19:25.821
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I apologize.

181
00:19:26.720 --> 00:19:27.265
<v Angelita Morillo>No, no worries.

182
00:19:27.361 --> 00:19:27.634
<v Angelita Morillo>Thank you.

183
00:19:27.730 --> 00:19:29.541
<v Angelita Morillo>Sorry, I jumped ahead on that one.

184
00:19:30.104 --> 00:19:36.309
<v Angelita Morillo>I'm just requesting that folks send an email with the updated amendment language so that we can all see it written.

185
00:19:36.519 --> 00:19:37.625
<v Angelita Morillo>I think that's helpful for me.

186
00:19:38.617 --> 00:19:46.124
<v Angelita Morillo>Also, I just wanted to say if I have to be camera off for a bit, just dealing with some chronic back pain today, and I don't think the public wants to see me laying on the floor.

187
00:19:47.076 --> 00:19:50.152
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So thank you, Councilor, and we absolutely understand.

188
00:19:52.009 --> 00:19:53.578
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I'll send an email your way right now.

189
00:19:55.609 --> 00:19:56.752
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Knoll, are you back in the queue?

190
00:19:57.155 --> 00:20:02.294
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah, I just wanted to clarify, uh, because when I first mentioned it, we hadn't done the second yet.

191
00:20:02.487 --> 00:20:07.933
<v Sameer Kanal>The intent behind that amendment was the amendment I put forward was to be friendly.

192
00:20:09.440 --> 00:20:16.738
<v Sameer Kanal>So I'd ask if my co-sponsors to that, to the ordinance, would be willing to accept the Kanal 1 amendment that was emailed out as friendly.

193
00:20:17.063 --> 00:20:18.217
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

194
00:20:19.988 --> 00:20:20.833
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I see nods yes.

195
00:20:22.175 --> 00:20:22.384
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

196
00:20:22.820 --> 00:20:23.547
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Novick.

197
00:20:24.467 --> 00:20:33.275
<v Steve Novick>I just wanted to note that I'll be proposing an amendment to the committee structure as well, which my staff is going to be emailing to the clerk shortly if they haven't already.

198
00:20:33.665 --> 00:20:34.964
<v Steve Novick>And then we'll distribute copies of it.

199
00:20:35.679 --> 00:20:39.722
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Can you give a 2-second so that folks testifying know what that is?

200
00:20:41.450 --> 00:20:59.832
<v Steve Novick>It would involve striking the idea of, actually I don't think that in the, it's formally referred to as a leadership committee, but it replaced the idea of the council president meeting with all of the committee chairs with an idea that committee chairs will meet with their counterparts in committees that have sort of overlapping jurisdictions.

201
00:21:00.885 --> 00:21:05.998
<v Steve Novick>And only have one committee meet with another at a time, and the council president and vice president could attend those meetings.

202
00:21:06.431 --> 00:21:14.571
<v Steve Novick>Because my idea is that the point of committee chairs meeting with each other is to exchange information.

203
00:21:14.827 --> 00:21:19.298
<v Steve Novick>And I think that that's important when you've got sort of overlapping jurisdiction.

204
00:21:19.474 --> 00:21:35.680
<v Steve Novick>But I don't— I think that it causes public meetings problems and also kind of exclusivity problems if there's a group of 6 people that meets, and then by definition they can't tell any of the other 6 what they met about because that would violate quorum rules.

205
00:21:35.940 --> 00:21:41.365
<v Steve Novick>So I just think that we could achieve the goal of transmitting information without having a leadership committee.

206
00:21:43.690 --> 00:21:44.373
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

207
00:21:46.263 --> 00:21:48.598
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dunphy.

208
00:21:49.227 --> 00:21:49.420
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you.

209
00:21:49.484 --> 00:22:01.598
<v Jamie Dunphy>Very briefly, just colleagues, I sent an— or my team sent an email around about this yesterday, but with regard to the committee structure, You'll note that the resolution as filed is pretty bare bones, and that was an intentional choice.

210
00:22:02.737 --> 00:22:10.780
<v Jamie Dunphy>I had— we pulled out any of these sort of contentious pinch points that we didn't have unanimity around.

211
00:22:11.085 --> 00:22:14.818
<v Jamie Dunphy>For example, vice chair or chair, vice chair versus co-chair models.

212
00:22:15.251 --> 00:22:21.548
<v Jamie Dunphy>And I have subsequently filed amendments so that we can individually have an up and down vote on either of those.

213
00:22:21.887 --> 00:22:28.034
<v Jamie Dunphy>The intention is that if the council decides that chair, vice chair is the model to go with, great.

214
00:22:28.130 --> 00:22:30.888
<v Jamie Dunphy>If this body decides that co-chairs are the model to go with, great.

215
00:22:31.421 --> 00:22:36.626
<v Jamie Dunphy>If we can't come to an agreement, it defaults to a position of maximum flexibility for the president.

216
00:22:37.125 --> 00:22:43.407
<v Jamie Dunphy>So as we get into this, that is what you will be seeing filed in on the item itself.

217
00:22:43.567 --> 00:22:45.095
<v Jamie Dunphy>So just wanted to clarify that.

218
00:22:46.443 --> 00:22:47.311
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

219
00:22:47.472 --> 00:22:50.429
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And was there a second to Councilor Novick's proposal?

220
00:22:52.180 --> 00:22:52.382
<v Jamie Dunphy>Second.

221
00:22:52.500 --> 00:22:53.651
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Vice President.

222
00:22:56.119 --> 00:22:58.247
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal, are you back in the queue or is that an old hand?

223
00:22:58.971 --> 00:22:59.616
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, that's okay.

224
00:23:00.842 --> 00:23:05.304
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So for folks watching, I know that was a flurry of information very quickly.

225
00:23:06.075 --> 00:23:10.432
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'll try to summarize, and if I've missed something, please colleagues jump in.

226
00:23:11.107 --> 00:23:22.711
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have an underlying proposal on council meetings, which was debated in a work session, an amendment from Councilor Kanal, which has been proposed and seconded, which would capture thank you.

227
00:23:22.776 --> 00:23:24.846
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>—Some of the conversation from that work session.

228
00:23:25.358 --> 00:23:38.403
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>An amendment from Councilor Smith that we are getting written up, which has been seconded, which would change the meeting schedule to include a weekly morning meeting and once-a-month evening meetings.

229
00:23:39.141 --> 00:23:51.318
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And an amendment from Councilor Koyama Lane, which has been seconded, to decrease the amount of time before the council president must schedule something at a council meeting from 90 days to 45 days.

230
00:23:52.137 --> 00:24:07.192
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have an amendment that is under Councilor Dunphy's name, which a few councilors' staff helped to put together, that is a bit of a bare-bones capturing of the conversation around committees from our work session.

231
00:24:07.882 --> 00:24:17.239
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have a proposal that I have put forward based on some conversations since that was put together with a number of councilors around another way that we could think about committees.

232
00:24:17.287 --> 00:24:17.479
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you.

233
00:24:18.279 --> 00:24:29.951
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And a proposal put forward by Councilor Novick for that second item, the committee item around how our council's leadership meets with committee chairs.

234
00:24:31.277 --> 00:24:32.134
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Did I miss anything?

235
00:24:33.846 --> 00:24:34.025
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

236
00:24:35.544 --> 00:24:43.041
<v Sameer Kanal>Just clarifying that that amendment was friendly and not seconded the package on the first one that I put forward.

237
00:24:43.903 --> 00:24:47.482
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think that we need to vote on it and not just accept it in.

238
00:24:47.980 --> 00:24:48.173
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay.

239
00:24:49.104 --> 00:24:50.435
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Just given the extent of it.

240
00:24:50.548 --> 00:24:52.699
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But I do— I thought I heard a second on—.

241
00:24:52.892 --> 00:24:53.470
<v Sameer Kanal>It was seconded.

242
00:24:53.534 --> 00:24:53.855
<v Dan Ryan>Okay.

243
00:24:54.336 --> 00:24:55.026
<v Sameer Kanal>Okay, thank you.

244
00:24:55.123 --> 00:24:55.941
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

245
00:24:56.743 --> 00:25:15.375
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>There may be other changes as we discuss that folks want to bring forward, but for our community members who are signed up to testify, this at least gives us a starting place for what the breadth of the debate is So with that, seeing no one else in the queue, Rebecca, could you please call up our first testifiers?

246
00:25:17.049 --> 00:25:21.759
<v Rebecca Dobert>Our first testifier is Terry Harris, followed by Donna Cohen.

247
00:25:22.439 --> 00:25:27.305
<v Rebecca Dobert>And excuse me, President, do you want to go to 6 minutes each or 3 per?

248
00:25:28.096 --> 00:25:31.373
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Because we're combining the 2, do we have anybody else signed up to testify?

249
00:25:32.141 --> 00:25:34.087
<v Rebecca Dobert>No, these are the only testifiers.

250
00:25:34.873 --> 00:25:39.280
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Give a little more time since we're opening it up on both at the same time.

251
00:25:39.442 --> 00:25:40.182
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Yes, thank you.

252
00:25:40.744 --> 00:25:41.516
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Mr. Harris, welcome.

253
00:25:42.512 --> 00:25:52.357
<v On Monday>Yeah, you know, my Governance Committee testimony on Monday went 14 minutes, so cutting it in half is going to be, you know, just great.

254
00:25:53.005 --> 00:26:04.284
<v On Monday>I appreciate the opportunity, um, as always, um, and I've had a lot of time to sort through all of this stuff, and I appreciate putting all the amendments out there.

255
00:26:06.127 --> 00:26:11.364
<v On Monday>I'm going to testify as generally as to not get into the weeds of all your amendments.

256
00:26:12.471 --> 00:26:28.469
<v On Monday>Um, in my assessment, the council's problem— and this is important— um, with committees and with meetings runs deeper than what scheduling consolidation or jurisdictional realignments are going to fix.

257
00:26:29.576 --> 00:26:45.371
<v On Monday>You have some fundamental problems, fundamental questions around the role of committees and council the procedural structure to implement that role effectively, and providing meaningful, meaningful public involvement within that structure.

258
00:26:46.453 --> 00:26:56.604
<v On Monday>Unless and until the council commits to an approach to these interconnected problems, the committee system and the council will continue to struggle.

259
00:26:57.519 --> 00:27:05.159
<v On Monday>The starting point for your committee structure discussions should be a recognition that committees are a solution and not a problem.

260
00:27:06.798 --> 00:27:12.532
<v On Monday>So I have 4 pages of written comments in your files.

261
00:27:14.094 --> 00:27:24.862
<v On Monday>That is not going to fit my 6 minutes, so I'm going to hit the highlights here, the headlines if you will, and will be available to answer questions.

262
00:27:26.150 --> 00:27:31.409
<v On Monday>First of all, an increase in regular meetings is not going to solve your workload problem.

263
00:27:32.301 --> 00:27:39.422
<v On Monday>The detailed work of committee— detailed work of governance needs to be done in committee in parallel.

264
00:27:42.890 --> 00:27:51.849
<v On Monday>In addition to establishing the new committees, the council should commit to actually using them, and a committee of the whole will help you do that.

265
00:27:53.410 --> 00:27:58.157
<v On Monday>Um, I had, you know, 14 minutes on committee of the whole and governance yes.

266
00:27:58.383 --> 00:27:58.864
<v On Monday>On Monday.

267
00:27:59.811 --> 00:28:03.952
<v On Monday>Um, and I'll just say that you have some experience with that.

268
00:28:04.708 --> 00:28:08.704
<v On Monday>Your budget committee operated as a committee of the whole.

269
00:28:09.523 --> 00:28:13.746
<v On Monday>You took testimony in the budget committee as a committee of the whole.

270
00:28:14.259 --> 00:28:19.541
<v On Monday>You did your amendments, you did all of your adjustment in the budget committee as a committee of the whole.

271
00:28:20.682 --> 00:28:28.023
<v On Monday>Then you convened from the budget committee to the regular council to pass a budget bill.

272
00:28:28.364 --> 00:28:30.303
<v On Monday>So that's the experience.

273
00:28:30.691 --> 00:28:38.679
<v On Monday>That can help you with broader discussions other than the budget if you implement it in rules.

274
00:28:38.938 --> 00:28:39.928
<v On Monday>So that's all I'll say about that.

275
00:28:42.619 --> 00:28:58.967
<v On Monday>Verbal comments and agency presentations on legislation or legislative items should be generally necessary only once, and it should be directed almost exclusively to committees.

276
00:29:00.689 --> 00:29:12.054
<v On Monday>If the public is here to give input to the council on a legislative item, they need to know that their input is being heard in the right place at the right time by the right people.

277
00:29:13.182 --> 00:29:16.308
<v On Monday>Doing two hearings is confusing that.

278
00:29:17.573 --> 00:29:25.201
<v On Monday>And if you want to do things in parallel, you need to have that input in committee where the work is really being done, and that's early on.

279
00:29:26.450 --> 00:29:36.017
<v On Monday>If you need a full council to hear a hearing, use a committee of the whole and do all the committee work at that level.

280
00:29:36.801 --> 00:29:42.778
<v On Monday>Don't make people come twice because they don't know which, which hearing matters.

281
00:29:42.826 --> 00:29:43.067
<v Sameer Kanal>I agree.

282
00:29:43.838 --> 00:29:52.185
<v On Monday>And that will save you time overall so that you don't have presentations over and over again.

283
00:29:54.940 --> 00:29:59.644
<v On Monday>Committees need to be structured to make recommendations to the full council that have consequence.

284
00:30:01.339 --> 00:30:07.057
<v On Monday>They should be able to move things to a consent calendar or just kill things outright in committee.

285
00:30:10.769 --> 00:30:11.416
<v Rebecca Dobert>Finally, on—.

286
00:30:13.326 --> 00:30:22.976
<v On Monday>To operate effectively, and you're going to have full council meetings weekly and not biweekly, you're going to need more committee hearings.

287
00:30:23.412 --> 00:30:27.106
<v On Monday>The committee hearings bimonthly are not going to be enough.

288
00:30:27.510 --> 00:30:33.467
<v On Monday>So you will have shifted the procedural bottleneck into committee now.

289
00:30:34.270 --> 00:30:54.576
<v On Monday>I'd suggest that you can have long-form and short-form committee hearings alternating weeks so that long-form you can have lots of testimony and discussion on big things, and short-form you can do the quick little code fixes and things that get your eyes on it, but it doesn't take as long.

290
00:30:56.960 --> 00:30:59.689
<v On Monday>Miscellaneous considerations in these last 55 seconds.

291
00:31:01.465 --> 00:31:05.018
<v On Monday>Governance and finance probably ought to be its own committee.

292
00:31:05.453 --> 00:31:08.817
<v On Monday>And not be relegated to a committee of the whole or full council thing.

293
00:31:09.252 --> 00:31:18.476
<v On Monday>There are lots of small little nitpicky things in government governance and finance that deserve committee attention, not the attention of all of you every single time.

294
00:31:22.207 --> 00:31:30.767
<v On Monday>The internal service rates discussion needs not be an entire council conversation.

295
00:31:32.008 --> 00:31:33.884
<v On Monday>But it does need attention in a committee.

296
00:31:34.910 --> 00:31:39.287
<v On Monday>The subquorum leadership group is a good idea, but its membership shouldn't drive the number of committees.

297
00:31:40.665 --> 00:31:50.335
<v On Monday>There is some finesse that can be had to avoid your open meetings problems, and maybe Councilor Novick's amendment might address that.

298
00:31:51.249 --> 00:31:55.162
<v On Monday>5 Standing committees and a committee of the whole is a nicely sized thing.

299
00:31:55.337 --> 00:32:01.584
<v On Monday>And 10 seconds, committee chairs and vice chairs, are preferable to committee co-chairs.

300
00:32:03.338 --> 00:32:04.766
<v On Monday>Only 9 seconds over.

301
00:32:04.943 --> 00:32:05.867
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Mr. Harris.

302
00:32:06.144 --> 00:32:07.554
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We appreciate hearing from you.

303
00:32:07.618 --> 00:32:09.986
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I know you've spent a lot of time thinking about these topics.

304
00:32:15.230 --> 00:32:16.215
<v Rebecca Dobert>You're good to approach, Donna.

305
00:32:18.165 --> 00:32:19.127
<v Rebecca Dobert>Next we have Donna Cohen.

306
00:32:20.569 --> 00:32:20.667
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

307
00:32:20.931 --> 00:32:21.275
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Welcome.

308
00:32:21.423 --> 00:32:22.900
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you for being here with us today.

309
00:32:23.145 --> 00:32:23.573
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

310
00:32:24.432 --> 00:32:27.790
<v Donna Cohen>I'm going to take a breath in between the 2 testimonies, if that's okay.

311
00:32:30.573 --> 00:32:34.461
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So, um, morning, Council.

312
00:32:34.510 --> 00:32:35.607
<v Donna Cohen>My name is Donna Cohen.

313
00:32:36.836 --> 00:32:38.357
<v Donna Cohen>Uh, I'm a resident of District 2.

314
00:32:40.154 --> 00:32:42.339
<v Donna Cohen>I present workshops on civics to adults.

315
00:32:43.432 --> 00:32:54.022
<v Donna Cohen>In the how to engage with your elected officials part of my Citizen Activism 101 workshop, which I presented at Midland and Albina branch libraries this summer.

316
00:32:54.763 --> 00:33:00.432
<v Donna Cohen>I have always been pleased to say how fulfilling it is to speak to one's city council, county commission, et cetera.

317
00:33:00.674 --> 00:33:02.179
<v Donna Cohen>Would you show the picture, please?

318
00:33:03.450 --> 00:33:13.013
<v Donna Cohen>This is a picture I show of when several of us came to council about a very serious, as in people were dying, traffic safety issue in St. Johns.

319
00:33:14.321 --> 00:33:16.692
<v Donna Cohen>Our t-shirts, by the way, signified the project we were working on.

320
00:33:16.740 --> 00:33:16.855
<v Candace Avalos>Thank you.

321
00:33:18.646 --> 00:33:28.147
<v Donna Cohen>At the time, I'm actually on the schedule there, but I had spoken before and a new person wanted to speak from the neighborhood and we swapped, something which can't be done now.

322
00:33:28.698 --> 00:33:29.881
<v Donna Cohen>I don't quite understand that.

323
00:33:30.755 --> 00:33:38.681
<v Donna Cohen>Now I add a picture showing the slow process of the public communication process, unfortunately.

324
00:33:38.744 --> 00:33:45.231
<v Donna Cohen>Prior to 2025, my experience was that I could request a slot to speak to council and get scheduled within a week to a month.

325
00:33:45.279 --> 00:33:45.328
<v Angelita Morillo>Yes.

326
00:33:46.167 --> 00:33:50.613
<v Donna Cohen>The current wait is, is over 2 months, and you're lucky if you can grab a spot at all.

327
00:33:51.159 --> 00:34:00.915
<v Donna Cohen>And the waitlist option, which may or may not prove useful, is exclusive to those who can get email alerts from their phones and respond within as little as 4 to 5 minutes.

328
00:34:01.269 --> 00:34:07.061
<v Donna Cohen>I kid you not, I have timestamp evidence of waitlist opportunities and when they are fulfilled.

329
00:34:08.009 --> 00:34:13.159
<v Donna Cohen>And not everyone has the luxury of flexibility for last-minute cancellations for a slot either.

330
00:34:13.880 --> 00:34:22.436
<v Donna Cohen>As outlined on the webpage description for this agenda item, there have been less than half the opportunities for open public comment with the new council meeting structure.

331
00:34:22.998 --> 00:34:28.590
<v Donna Cohen>Being able to speak to council on matters which council has yet to discuss or even be aware is critical.

332
00:34:28.670 --> 00:34:35.577
<v Donna Cohen>Council definitely needs to meet more frequently and thus provide more opportunities for the public to speak on any topic.

333
00:34:36.282 --> 00:34:38.556
<v Donna Cohen>Um, yes, the proposed ordinance will do just that.

334
00:34:38.621 --> 00:34:38.717
<v Unidentified speaker>Thank you.

335
00:34:39.744 --> 00:34:51.137
<v Donna Cohen>As someone who participated in forums during the creation of the plans for the new city government and was on the speakers bureau for Portland United for Change, I was impressed at how often the issue of communication between the public and the city council was brought up.

336
00:34:51.715 --> 00:34:55.427
<v Donna Cohen>I commend city council for recognizing the issues addressed by the proposed ordinance.

337
00:34:55.956 --> 00:35:01.563
<v Donna Cohen>We're still going through growing pains in our new government— with our new government, but you're clearly trying.

338
00:35:01.820 --> 00:35:07.251
<v Donna Cohen>Thank you for the proposal to increase council meetings and thus Public communication with council.

339
00:35:11.956 --> 00:35:17.885
<v Donna Cohen>Okay, so now the, um, second ordinance on policy committees.

340
00:35:20.076 --> 00:35:35.648
<v Donna Cohen>Um, in regard to the policy committees, there is a discussion of whether to reduce the number of committees from the current 8, whether to increase the time allowed for the meetings, and whether to make sure there is someone from every district on all policy committees I am in support of all these changes.

341
00:35:36.788 --> 00:35:43.436
<v Donna Cohen>One of my main concerns is that there has not been enough— there's not been time scheduled for open public communication during policy committee meetings.

342
00:35:44.079 --> 00:35:49.827
<v Donna Cohen>For example, I have some thoughts and some research to share with the Housing Committee but have had no opportunity to share them.

343
00:35:49.956 --> 00:35:52.798
<v Donna Cohen>I wrote to all the committee members, received no response.

344
00:35:53.184 --> 00:36:03.311
<v Donna Cohen>I wrote again, indicating a second attempt, and received response from 2 councilor offices, both directing me to the agenda page where there was no option for open public comment.

345
00:36:04.018 --> 00:36:06.389
<v Donna Cohen>Neither is there an email specifically for the committee.

346
00:36:06.501 --> 00:36:10.429
<v Donna Cohen>In other words, the public is totally shut out for anything but an agenda item.

347
00:36:11.791 --> 00:36:31.469
<v Donna Cohen>Another example is that, as the issue of life and death impact to tens of thousands, not only in District 2, but all those who have family members that work at the port facilities and Rivergate Industrial Area in District 2, namely that the North Peninsula will be completely severed from the rest of Portland after the quake to come, possibly for months.

348
00:36:31.998 --> 00:36:36.206
<v Donna Cohen>This should have been able to be presented to the Transportation and Public Safety Committees.

349
00:36:37.202 --> 00:36:39.596
<v Donna Cohen>It is a separate issue from the CEI overall.

350
00:36:40.655 --> 00:36:53.327
<v Donna Cohen>By not being able to do so, we saw the siloing of efforts to solicit monies from the legislature, one effort by the mayor and the city as a whole, and another by the community on the North Peninsula, just D2 councilors and our state legislators.

351
00:36:53.376 --> 00:36:53.585
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

352
00:36:54.244 --> 00:36:57.264
<v Donna Cohen>Imagine how that looked to the State Transportation Committee.

353
00:36:58.179 --> 00:37:06.324
<v Donna Cohen>Now some of our leaders on the North Peninsula are seeking a Zoom meeting with the mayor and some of you councilors to smooth this out for the upcoming special session.

354
00:37:06.518 --> 00:37:08.639
<v Donna Cohen>We want to be on the same page.

355
00:37:09.425 --> 00:37:17.329
<v Donna Cohen>We have received an answer— as of yesterday, we had only received an answer from one office, Councilor Murillo, and today we heard something from D2.

356
00:37:18.085 --> 00:37:23.001
<v Donna Cohen>Uh, and I dropped off something in the mayor's office and Councilor Clark's office today.

357
00:37:24.833 --> 00:37:45.106
<v Donna Cohen>Public Communication and Policy Committees will allow input on new ideas to those council members most involved with the topic and overall provide more opportunities for public communication with, communication with council because the proposal to increase such time with the full council only brings us up to the amount that was available under our prior form of government.

358
00:37:45.831 --> 00:37:46.523
<v Donna Cohen>Thank you for your time.

359
00:37:48.454 --> 00:37:51.652
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you very much for being here, Donna, and for sharing all of those ideas.

360
00:37:51.992 --> 00:37:52.331
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you.

361
00:37:53.945 --> 00:37:55.077
<v Rebecca Dobert>That concludes testimony.

362
00:37:59.369 --> 00:38:12.579
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, I think we've heard a number of additional ideas, some of which have been part of our conversation and some of which have not yet thank you.

363
00:38:12.579 --> 00:38:12.579
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you, Councilor Herbold, for that update.

364
00:38:12.579 --> 00:38:12.719
<v Rebecca Dobert>We appreciate that.

365
00:38:12.719 --> 00:38:16.599
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We appreciate the information that we get from both Terry and Donna.

366
00:38:16.599 --> 00:38:41.485
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I would like us to focus first on the first agenda item, the ordinance before us, and open up discussion on— sorry, I'm losing my page here— open up discussion on the ordinance to adopt council regular meeting schedule pursuant to code subsection 3.02010.

367
00:38:44.739 --> 00:38:51.648
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have a few amendments open, but I would like to start with the amendment that Councilor Kanal has put on the table.

368
00:38:51.711 --> 00:38:53.047
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>He was the first to propose one.

369
00:38:53.177 --> 00:38:57.423
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It also generally relates to the discussion that we've already had.

370
00:38:57.472 --> 00:39:00.184
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal, are you in the queue to speak to that amendment?

371
00:39:00.559 --> 00:39:00.985
<v Steve Novick>I can be.

372
00:39:01.394 --> 00:39:02.755
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, why don't we start there?

373
00:39:03.936 --> 00:39:04.657
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Madam President.

374
00:39:07.496 --> 00:39:12.427
<v Sameer Kanal>Colleagues, uh, today we are introducing an ordinance which would return council to scheduled weekly meetings.

375
00:39:12.507 --> 00:39:15.527
<v Sameer Kanal>It's being proposed by Councilor Dunphy, Councilor Avalos, and myself.

376
00:39:16.088 --> 00:39:30.128
<v Sameer Kanal>Uh, we talked through the document at a work session last week, and based on those pieces of feedback heard from colleagues, uh, I have proposed an amendment which has been, um, agreed to by both co-sponsors as well.

377
00:39:30.175 --> 00:39:30.496
<v Nancy Thorington>Thank you.

378
00:39:31.202 --> 00:39:34.023
<v Sameer Kanal>To reflect your feedback in it.

379
00:39:34.152 --> 00:39:38.592
<v Sameer Kanal>It does not reflect the things that were points of contention, as the council president brought up.

380
00:39:38.657 --> 00:39:49.045
<v Sameer Kanal>I think we can debate those subsequent to this amendment, but it does reflect everything that was discussed that was a consensus position or near consensus.

381
00:39:49.541 --> 00:39:52.090
<v Sameer Kanal>So I'll just walk through it briefly.

382
00:39:53.148 --> 00:40:05.605
<v Sameer Kanal>The key points here in the council findings, Section 1, It adjusts for the dates and times that have been updated since this was written in May.

383
00:40:06.168 --> 00:40:07.668
<v Sameer Kanal>It removes references to July.

384
00:40:07.958 --> 00:40:08.797
<v Sameer Kanal>We're past July now.

385
00:40:09.248 --> 00:40:13.253
<v Sameer Kanal>It adds into the findings the dates that we had scheduled special meetings.

386
00:40:13.914 --> 00:40:17.992
<v Sameer Kanal>And the key points are in the now therefore the council directs.

387
00:40:19.016 --> 00:40:22.576
<v Sameer Kanal>And it removes D, E, and F entirely.

388
00:40:22.625 --> 00:40:22.690
<v Steve Novick>Okay.

389
00:40:23.545 --> 00:40:24.014
<v Sameer Kanal>From it.

390
00:40:25.164 --> 00:40:33.545
<v Sameer Kanal>This is the removing the no executive sessions may be scheduled on Thursday between 2:00 and 5:00 PM unless with the written consent of at least 9 councilors.

391
00:40:33.836 --> 00:40:39.686
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm realizing as I read this, and I'll mention now to Rebecca, sorry, Section C should also be removed.

392
00:40:40.554 --> 00:40:42.190
<v Sameer Kanal>That's based on feedback there.

393
00:40:42.255 --> 00:40:43.583
<v Sameer Kanal>So we'll send you that updated file.

394
00:40:45.152 --> 00:40:48.601
<v Sameer Kanal>It removes the references to meetings on July 2nd and June 21st.

395
00:40:48.826 --> 00:40:48.969
<v Sameer Kanal>Yes.

396
00:40:49.083 --> 00:41:17.628
<v Sameer Kanal>That was Part E. And it also removes references to the budget-specific work sessions that are— and meetings that we'd already scheduled, which was Section F. So it narrows the field back down to the creation of a new schedule that has weekly meetings on Wednesday, the soft stop on, um, at 9 o'clock on evening meetings, and then there's updates to the impact statement to reflect everything I just said, and you can look down there.

397
00:41:18.097 --> 00:41:34.340
<v Sameer Kanal>Finally, although this was not discussed, I did take the opportunity to clarify one item in the second and third to last lines of the impact statement, which just had the word folks, and I expanded that out to emphasize who folks refers to, which is community, councilors, and staff.

398
00:41:34.760 --> 00:41:39.244
<v Sameer Kanal>That was not discussed, but I figured it was— it made sense to update through this process as well.

399
00:41:41.414 --> 00:41:42.603
<v Sameer Kanal>So that's what the amendment would do.

400
00:41:42.682 --> 00:41:44.224
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm happy to take any questions on it.

401
00:41:44.306 --> 00:41:51.510
<v Sameer Kanal>Again, this was, uh, my interpretation with colleagues based off of the full council feedback in the work session.

402
00:41:51.623 --> 00:41:52.918
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

403
00:41:53.226 --> 00:41:53.954
<v Sameer Kanal>And this was seconded.

404
00:41:54.538 --> 00:41:55.639
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And this has been seconded.

405
00:41:57.396 --> 00:41:58.219
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

406
00:41:58.380 --> 00:42:05.695
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, is there any discussion to the amendment before us as described by Councilor Kanal?

407
00:42:07.579 --> 00:42:10.818
<v Candace Avalos>I guess my question is, are they— is it— sorry, point of order.

408
00:42:11.608 --> 00:42:15.074
<v Candace Avalos>Because it's friendly, is it an amendment that we have to approve or no?

409
00:42:15.574 --> 00:42:20.293
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think that this is extensive enough that we should vote on it, just with all of those removals.

410
00:42:20.550 --> 00:42:23.898
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, I hope it moves quickly, but I think we should vote.

411
00:42:24.494 --> 00:42:26.119
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Uh, Councilor Zimmerman, was your hand up?

412
00:42:28.190 --> 00:42:28.547
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Go right ahead.

413
00:42:29.592 --> 00:42:29.853
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thanks.

414
00:42:30.081 --> 00:42:45.990
<v Eric Zimmerman>Um, Councilor Knoll, I appreciate the detail in which you listened at those work sessions and, and C, D, E, and F being out, um, is enough for me to support this amendment and make this the new underlying baseline document.

415
00:42:46.766 --> 00:42:55.012
<v Eric Zimmerman>I also plan to support, uh, you know, Councilor Smith's, but this is, I think, a better start if that is, um, if it's going to go forward.

416
00:42:55.061 --> 00:43:06.449
<v Sameer Kanal>So I just want to say thanks for that, and, and you'll have my support on this amendment to the and I'm not sure if everybody heard it, but just to clarify, C is not in the underlying file, but C should be removed as well.

417
00:43:06.514 --> 00:43:08.277
<v Sameer Kanal>That's an error on our part when we sent it in.

418
00:43:08.340 --> 00:43:14.255
<v Sameer Kanal>So I'd ask Councilor Green if you're okay with friendly amending this amendment to include the removal of C.

419
00:43:14.849 --> 00:43:23.971
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So essentially the therefores would be A with the removal of the date and B, and that's really what we're talking about here.

420
00:43:25.235 --> 00:43:25.349
<v Angelita Morillo>Correct.

421
00:43:25.641 --> 00:43:26.485
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

422
00:43:26.550 --> 00:43:27.492
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Koyama Lane?

423
00:43:28.012 --> 00:43:29.978
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>That was almost exactly what I was going to say.

424
00:43:30.449 --> 00:43:30.757
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you.

425
00:43:33.340 --> 00:43:34.148
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Smith?

426
00:43:35.052 --> 00:43:36.039
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you, Madam President.

427
00:43:36.184 --> 00:43:45.708
<v Loretta Smith>I am in favor of weekly council meetings and generally supportive of Councilor Kanal's proposed amendment, which appears to meet several of our shared goals.

428
00:43:46.226 --> 00:43:50.362
<v Loretta Smith>One area of concern that I have is with introducing 2 evening meetings, Yes.

429
00:43:50.425 --> 00:43:59.675
<v Loretta Smith>Considering the, the increased costs and the toll evening meetings have on our support staff, that, that would not be the most optimal way to go about it.

430
00:44:00.061 --> 00:44:18.125
<v Loretta Smith>In the financial and budgetary impact section of the amendment, it is suggested that the proposed changes would occur parallel to a corresponding reduction in committee meetings in a way that would mitigate, cancel out, or even exceed the budget increase from the additional full council meetings.

431
00:44:19.023 --> 00:44:34.271
<v Loretta Smith>But since its submission, the current best proposal for a subcommittee structure includes 5 standing committees down from 8, which would not reduce committee meetings or meeting time enough to be proportional to weekly council meetings as proposed.

432
00:44:34.768 --> 00:44:43.387
<v Loretta Smith>It seems that the only way to mitigate a substantial increase in cost without rejecting the proposal would be to limit evening meetings to once per month.

433
00:44:43.500 --> 00:44:54.739
<v Loretta Smith>Councilmember Smith, Individual council offices may be able to hold office hours in the evening on an individual need— needed basis to increase opportunities to, uh, engage with the public.

434
00:44:55.365 --> 00:45:00.103
<v Loretta Smith>And engagement is important and it's critical, and I've, I've heard a lot about that.

435
00:45:00.376 --> 00:45:04.663
<v Loretta Smith>So that's where I'm at about the, the current proposal.

436
00:45:05.739 --> 00:45:06.460
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

437
00:45:07.184 --> 00:45:08.934
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Clark.

438
00:45:09.737 --> 00:45:10.605
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Council President.

439
00:45:11.021 --> 00:45:15.184
<v Olivia Clark>Um, I agree with Councilor Smith, but I also had a question.

440
00:45:15.231 --> 00:45:18.943
<v Olivia Clark>So if this passes today, when does it go into effect?

441
00:45:21.454 --> 00:45:24.983
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So this is an ordinance that does not currently have an emergency clause.

442
00:45:25.626 --> 00:45:36.617
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So we are considering amendments today, but unless somebody introduces an emergency clause, this would actually move to the calendar on September September 3rd for passage.

443
00:45:37.195 --> 00:45:41.518
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Non-emergency ordinances go into effect 30 days after passage.

444
00:45:42.418 --> 00:45:57.023
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I have scheduled out on our calendars, or I have had the clerk hold time on our calendars, every Wednesday morning moving forward, and we have been scheduling those as special meetings.

445
00:45:57.152 --> 00:46:08.565
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So it would be my intent, if it appears that we're moving in the direction of passing this to begin implementing a schedule as close to this as we can get through special meetings immediately upon passage.

446
00:46:09.081 --> 00:46:22.996
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But it would not go into effect until 30 days after passage, which would either— or 30 days after passage, which would likely be September 3rd, I believe, is that first Wednesday of the month, unless we were to add an emergency clause today.

447
00:46:24.880 --> 00:46:25.972
<v Olivia Clark>Okay, I was thinking October.

448
00:46:26.266 --> 00:46:30.697
<v Olivia Clark>But maybe I'm— am I calculating that right?

449
00:46:31.340 --> 00:46:31.757
<v Olivia Clark>October.

450
00:46:31.902 --> 00:46:36.333
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>October 3rd would be the effective date if it was 30 days after passage on September 3rd.

451
00:46:36.398 --> 00:46:39.737
<v Olivia Clark>Okay, but you're basically scheduling as though it were the real thing.

452
00:46:40.492 --> 00:47:00.271
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have been scheduling special meetings to allow us to get through our work without running overtime for the last few weeks, and I would intend to continue that practice unless I heard from folks can you talk a little bit about the budget impact and what that means for the Council Clerk's Office?

453
00:47:03.297 --> 00:47:10.380
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I can do my best, and I also may phone a friend as I start to talk because I would—.

454
00:47:10.492 --> 00:47:11.429
<v Eric Zimmerman>Just a point of order.

455
00:47:11.686 --> 00:47:17.257
<v Eric Zimmerman>I want to make sure, because I'm a little bit— I want to make sure we're talking about the amendment because then we have the overarching vote.

456
00:47:18.273 --> 00:47:30.364
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I know it was friendly, but that could be confusing because— and I'm sorry, Councilor, but like right now as it reads with 2 night meetings, I'll be a no vote on the overarching document.

457
00:47:30.798 --> 00:47:35.295
<v Eric Zimmerman>But this amendment I think is an improvement to the overarching document, so I plan to vote for the amendment.

458
00:47:36.081 --> 00:47:39.806
<v Eric Zimmerman>I just want to clarify that because it is a strange friendly amendment but substantive.

459
00:47:40.112 --> 00:47:41.364
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Let's do this, Councilor.

460
00:47:41.476 --> 00:47:56.282
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>There is a fair amount of data that we've been sent about cost of previous meetings, and I'm going to see if we can get somebody from our city operations team here to talk specific numbers on costs when we get back to the underlying ordinance.

461
00:47:56.909 --> 00:48:03.960
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So let's hold on the answer to that question, but I'll make sure that we have information at least as good as what I can share and hopefully better.

462
00:48:04.217 --> 00:48:04.442
<v Olivia Clark>Okay.

463
00:48:04.505 --> 00:48:05.534
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Once we're through this amendment.

464
00:48:05.597 --> 00:48:12.199
<v Olivia Clark>Let me just say that I, I don't feel a real sense of urgency right now before the end of the year to have these meetings.

465
00:48:13.797 --> 00:48:24.702
<v Olivia Clark>I'm not feeling that kind of sense of urgency, but I am really concerned about the impact on staff, not— and not just the clerk staff, but all the other staff that we have come to this committee as well.

466
00:48:25.378 --> 00:48:26.846
<v Olivia Clark>Just put— I'll put that out there.

467
00:48:26.942 --> 00:48:27.539
<v Olivia Clark>I'm very concerned.

468
00:48:29.157 --> 00:48:29.432
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

469
00:48:30.306 --> 00:48:31.018
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal?

470
00:48:33.382 --> 00:48:45.925
<v Sameer Kanal>I, I just, uh, ask for, if you could, uh, Madam President, take Councilor Zimmerman's point, because it was a point of order, that that's— this entire conversation around evening meetings is sort of separate from the amendment we're currently discussing.

471
00:48:46.277 --> 00:48:46.695
<v Candace Avalos>Correct.

472
00:48:46.920 --> 00:48:48.362
<v Sameer Kanal>So I do want to talk about it.

473
00:48:48.443 --> 00:48:54.170
<v Sameer Kanal>I just want to separate the conversation, and I just ask for that point of order to be acted upon.

474
00:48:55.585 --> 00:48:56.351
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

475
00:48:58.246 --> 00:48:59.853
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Any other discussion to the amendment?

476
00:49:00.313 --> 00:49:00.427
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

477
00:49:03.516 --> 00:49:14.407
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Rebecca, could you please call the roll on the amendment from Councilor Kanal, which among other things removes, uh, C, D, and E from the enacted language, and F?

478
00:49:18.094 --> 00:49:19.126
<v Olivia Clark>Can I ask a point of order?

479
00:49:19.481 --> 00:49:23.228
<v Olivia Clark>Okay, we're, we're voting on the overall—.

480
00:49:23.340 --> 00:49:25.762
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We're voting on Councilor Kanal's amendment.

481
00:49:26.166 --> 00:49:27.668
<v Olivia Clark>Okay, which would remove the original—.

482
00:49:27.766 --> 00:49:30.659
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>His original C, D, E, and F, among other changes.

483
00:49:31.286 --> 00:49:32.793
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Based on the conversation last week.

484
00:49:32.840 --> 00:49:40.086
<v Olivia Clark>Okay, I'm sorry to be dense, but when are we gonna vote on Councilor Smith's amendment?

485
00:49:40.199 --> 00:49:44.929
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Presumably that will be— I have that written down as the next thing on the list in the order things were proposed previously.

486
00:49:44.992 --> 00:49:46.210
<v Olivia Clark>Just wanted some reassurance.

487
00:49:47.413 --> 00:49:47.670
<v Sameer Kanal>Me too.

488
00:49:47.893 --> 00:49:52.286
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We will get to have the conversation on night meetings posthaste.

489
00:49:53.184 --> 00:49:54.579
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Rebecca, could you please call the roll?

490
00:49:55.445 --> 00:49:56.855
<v Rebecca Dobert>Just one point of clarification.

491
00:49:57.353 --> 00:50:01.541
<v Rebecca Dobert>This is Canal 1 for document 2025-300.

492
00:50:02.009 --> 00:50:02.137
<v Rebecca Dobert>Yes.

493
00:50:02.347 --> 00:50:03.135
<v Sameer Kanal>Plus C.

494
00:50:04.021 --> 00:50:07.784
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Canal 1 plus C, which was a floor amendment to Canal 1.

495
00:50:07.996 --> 00:50:10.054
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We're removing C as well.

496
00:50:11.481 --> 00:50:12.016
<v Rebecca Dobert>Koyama Lane?

497
00:50:12.518 --> 00:50:12.568
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Aye.

498
00:50:13.800 --> 00:50:14.202
<v Steve Novick>Murillo?

499
00:50:15.108 --> 00:50:15.155
<v Angelita Morillo>Aye.

500
00:50:16.318 --> 00:50:16.802
<v Rebecca Dobert>Novick?

501
00:50:17.045 --> 00:50:17.094
<v Olivia Clark>Aye.

502
00:50:18.094 --> 00:50:18.498
<v Rebecca Dobert>Clark?

503
00:50:18.661 --> 00:50:18.838
<v Olivia Clark>Aye.

504
00:50:19.097 --> 00:50:19.144
<v Loretta Smith>Aye.

505
00:50:19.565 --> 00:50:20.452
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Zimmerman?

506
00:50:24.405 --> 00:50:24.420
<v Steve Novick>Aye.

507
00:50:25.056 --> 00:50:25.072
<v Candace Avalos>Aye.

508
00:50:26.766 --> 00:50:26.815
<v Unidentified speaker>Aye.

509
00:50:28.233 --> 00:50:28.282
<v Unidentified speaker>Aye.

510
00:50:30.586 --> 00:50:30.635
<v Rebecca Dobert>Aye.

511
00:50:34.226 --> 00:50:34.356
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Aye.

512
00:50:35.358 --> 00:50:38.367
<v Rebecca Dobert>And the amendment is approved with 12 aye and 0 nay votes.

513
00:50:41.278 --> 00:50:42.085
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Rebecca.

514
00:50:42.731 --> 00:50:48.378
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, we did have 2 other amendments that were proposed previously to this ordinance.

515
00:50:48.460 --> 00:50:50.931
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Smith, do you have the written version of your amendment?

516
00:50:52.041 --> 00:51:08.789
<v Loretta Smith>I don't have a— Madam President, I don't have a written proposal other than the fact that, um, what I said earlier, to have all council meetings on Wednesdays starting at 9:30.

517
00:51:09.387 --> 00:51:14.208
<v Loretta Smith>The 3rd Wednesday of the month, we have 2 council meetings, one in the morning and one in the evening.

518
00:51:16.411 --> 00:51:17.186
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

519
00:51:17.300 --> 00:51:19.128
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And there was a second to that, I believe.

520
00:51:20.876 --> 00:51:24.969
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, colleagues, is there discussion on Councilor Smith's amendment?

521
00:51:25.114 --> 00:51:27.922
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And Rebecca, we are working on getting that in written form for you.

522
00:51:29.302 --> 00:51:30.041
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Zimmerman.

523
00:51:31.132 --> 00:51:32.126
<v Eric Zimmerman>So thank you, Councilor Smith.

524
00:51:32.271 --> 00:51:33.572
<v Eric Zimmerman>I plan to support the amendment.

525
00:51:34.021 --> 00:51:50.786
<v Eric Zimmerman>I, I think it is the underlying change to the document that couldn't get me to support weekly meetings, uh, as the I've said before, the largest city in Oregon should have weekly council meetings.

526
00:51:50.851 --> 00:51:52.307
<v Eric Zimmerman>I feel very strongly about that.

527
00:51:52.980 --> 00:51:54.586
<v Eric Zimmerman>There's a lot to continue to fix.

528
00:51:54.876 --> 00:52:05.260
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I also appreciate the consistency that you introduced by not having an either/or on that 3rd Wednesday, but having an increase.

529
00:52:06.255 --> 00:52:07.251
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I appreciate that.

530
00:52:07.396 --> 00:52:15.521
<v Eric Zimmerman>I share Councilor Clark's concerns about the urgency and timing and the impact on staff.

531
00:52:15.697 --> 00:52:21.764
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think one of the important things for, for anything, both the public and the staff, is predictability.

532
00:52:22.197 --> 00:52:23.577
<v Eric Zimmerman>And this will be predictable.

533
00:52:23.641 --> 00:52:26.161
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I think that that's a really good step in the right direction.

534
00:52:26.867 --> 00:52:30.672
<v Eric Zimmerman>So if this— I'll vote for the amendment, and I do hope it passes.

535
00:52:31.570 --> 00:52:35.744
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I think if it does, that we have a reasonable meeting schedule coming up potentially.

536
00:52:35.791 --> 00:52:35.936
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

537
00:52:35.983 --> 00:52:36.289
<v Candace Avalos>Councilor Dan Ryan.

538
00:52:40.434 --> 00:52:41.369
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

539
00:52:42.126 --> 00:52:44.751
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I want to note 2 things.

540
00:52:44.929 --> 00:52:50.719
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, there's been a lot of conversation about cost, and I appreciate, Councilor Clark, that you brought that up.

541
00:52:51.527 --> 00:53:05.864
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, I do believe, and I'm waiting to hear back, that having 2 meetings that day, um, Could increase costs because of the length of the day.

542
00:53:05.945 --> 00:53:30.891
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>What I've heard from staff is that if we go from 9:30 in the morning— and we've discussed this when talking about committee schedules, so I hadn't talked to them about it in the council context, but I'm, I'm taking that information from talking about committees to council— if we have a day that goes from 9:30 in the morning until 9 o'clock at night, that's about a 16-hour day for staff when you include the prep and wrap-up time.

543
00:53:31.612 --> 00:53:37.733
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And that creates a fair amount of additional cost for some of the teams that support us.

544
00:53:38.581 --> 00:53:48.998
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I am very supportive of narrowing down to one evening meeting for a lot of reasons, including the impact on our staff.

545
00:53:49.559 --> 00:54:03.177
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I had put in our budget and was pleased to see council support 2 evening meetings in our budgeted for, thinking that one of those would be for committees, but that we would have one evening council meeting.

546
00:54:03.224 --> 00:54:06.387
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm very supportive to moving to back to one evening council meeting.

547
00:54:06.965 --> 00:54:13.192
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I do have some concerns about the long day of the, the morning meeting still being scheduled on that day.

548
00:54:13.963 --> 00:54:19.869
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Zimmerman, I hear your argument about predictability, but I just want to raise those cost and staffing concerns.

549
00:54:19.916 --> 00:54:20.045
<v Nancy Thorington>Thank you.

550
00:54:20.393 --> 00:54:22.141
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, so that we're making an informed decision.

551
00:54:23.789 --> 00:54:25.487
<v Loretta Smith>Point of order, Madam President.

552
00:54:26.222 --> 00:54:29.826
<v Loretta Smith>Um, is there something in the charter that says we have to have one night meeting?

553
00:54:30.182 --> 00:54:31.271
<v Loretta Smith>Where, where did we get that from?

554
00:54:32.643 --> 00:54:33.498
<v Loretta Smith>It's in the charter?

555
00:54:35.614 --> 00:54:36.920
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It is not in the charter.

556
00:54:37.001 --> 00:54:41.927
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I believe that it was added in code around our schedule.

557
00:54:42.317 --> 00:54:43.369
<v Loretta Smith>Okay, okay, perfect.

558
00:54:44.114 --> 00:54:50.041
<v Loretta Smith>But I'm willing— I, I'm willing to accept a friendly amendment that would put it on another day so we don't have a night 19-hour day.

559
00:54:50.202 --> 00:55:01.307
<v Loretta Smith>But I just, I just think that, um, whatever day we put it on, it's going to link— it's going to still extend that day, even if we change it to Thursday or Tuesday or Monday.

560
00:55:02.221 --> 00:55:25.496
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>If we were to not have the morning meeting that day so that our support teams could come in later that day, essentially work with their supervisors to flex their time, so we would have, depending on if there were 3 or 4 weeks in a month, either— rather, if there are 4 or 5 weeks in a month, have either 3 or 4 morning meetings, but the day that we had an evening meeting, not have a morning meeting.

561
00:55:25.932 --> 00:55:29.945
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>The trade-off is we would lose the consistency that Councilor Zimmerman has mentioned.

562
00:55:30.543 --> 00:55:33.389
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That would address the concerns that I've raised.

563
00:55:34.710 --> 00:55:38.221
<v Loretta Smith>Yeah, it would be great to hear some more discussion about that and what that would look like.

564
00:55:39.960 --> 00:55:40.637
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Clark.

565
00:55:41.052 --> 00:55:43.862
<v Olivia Clark>Well, I, I would just say it's a long day.

566
00:55:44.327 --> 00:55:47.844
<v Olivia Clark>If we could start that day at 2:30 or something like that.

567
00:55:47.940 --> 00:55:49.851
<v Olivia Clark>We've done that in the past, I think, our others.

568
00:55:50.590 --> 00:55:53.865
<v Olivia Clark>Um, maybe you— should I make a friendly amendment to that?

569
00:55:55.038 --> 00:55:55.438
<v Olivia Clark>I've just—.

570
00:55:55.583 --> 00:56:03.177
<v Loretta Smith>Would you accept a friendly amendment to your amendment just to, to not have a, a Wednesday morning meeting and just substitute it with an evening meeting?

571
00:56:03.291 --> 00:56:06.228
<v Olivia Clark>No, to keep the evening meeting, but not start in the morning.

572
00:56:06.585 --> 00:56:07.523
<v Olivia Clark>We can start in the afternoon.

573
00:56:07.782 --> 00:56:10.358
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>On the 3rd Wednesday to not have a morning meeting.

574
00:56:10.405 --> 00:56:10.876
<v Olivia Clark>Exactly.

575
00:56:12.478 --> 00:56:19.371
<v Loretta Smith>I'd be okay with that if that's what people believe is good on the staff.

576
00:56:20.181 --> 00:56:28.623
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Clark, can I recommend that we hear, because there are a number of folks in the queue from others, and have you come back and offer that friendly amendment after we hear a little more discussion?

577
00:56:28.896 --> 00:56:30.331
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm very supportive of it, but—.

578
00:56:30.331 --> 00:56:30.766
<v Olivia Clark>That's great.

579
00:56:30.911 --> 00:56:34.702
<v Olivia Clark>Well, that's not why I got myself in the queue, but it was just— for the moment.

580
00:56:35.585 --> 00:56:43.251
<v Olivia Clark>What I really wanted to ask you about, Madam President, is just— you made the comment about evening meetings for committees.

581
00:56:44.148 --> 00:56:50.773
<v Olivia Clark>I'll be interested in that, that we hold that option open for committee chairs to have evening meetings.

582
00:56:50.885 --> 00:56:58.166
<v Olivia Clark>And I don't know how that factors into our budget or how we get permission to do that, but I just want to say that I think we should have that option.

583
00:56:59.416 --> 00:56:59.704
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

584
00:56:59.898 --> 00:57:07.619
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm happy to discuss my thoughts on that more when we talk about committees, or we can wait, get through, see where we land with committees, and then figure out implementation.

585
00:57:08.389 --> 00:57:08.887
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

586
00:57:08.983 --> 00:57:09.916
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Koyama Lane.

587
00:57:11.876 --> 00:57:21.833
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I also am interested in what it looks like for one of those 2 evening council meetings to be subbed out for a slot for possible evening committee meetings.

588
00:57:22.449 --> 00:57:30.074
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'm not saying that I'm one way or the other, but I'm interested in what that looks like and the cost from my understanding, it would be a lot less more.

589
00:57:30.364 --> 00:57:36.155
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I do think while I am a morning person, we do see higher engagement and attendance in the evening.

590
00:57:36.907 --> 00:57:41.003
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>If it also is to support our committee work, that could also make sense to me.

591
00:57:43.088 --> 00:57:43.800
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

592
00:57:43.978 --> 00:57:44.657
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Novick.

593
00:57:46.338 --> 00:57:52.047
<v Steve Novick>Yeah, I agree that we shouldn't be having anybody work 16-hour days.

594
00:57:53.780 --> 00:58:01.920
<v Steve Novick>I rather like the idea of having— always having Wednesday morning meetings.

595
00:58:02.032 --> 00:58:08.751
<v Steve Novick>So I would— might be comfortable with having the night meeting be on a different day, like Thursday evening.

596
00:58:10.293 --> 00:58:30.809
<v Steve Novick>That means we have more overall meetings, but it might help us use the night meetings in a more targeted way for topics which we know are going to have lots of public I mean, I think that maybe we could do just fine having the one meeting a month being a night meeting and not having it every Wednesday morning.

597
00:58:31.813 --> 00:58:33.898
<v Steve Novick>But so I'm sort of teetering between those two.

598
00:58:33.996 --> 00:58:42.635
<v Steve Novick>Do we have 3 morning meetings and one night meeting on a different night, or do we have 4 morning meetings plus a night meeting on a different night?

599
00:58:44.186 --> 00:58:52.831
<v Steve Novick>As to the idea of starting the meeting, Councilor Clark's idea of starting the meeting at 2:30, I do not like the idea of our meeting from 2:30 to 9 at night.

600
00:58:52.978 --> 00:58:56.563
<v Steve Novick>I don't think, don't think that we function well when we're meeting 7 hours straight.

601
00:58:59.760 --> 00:59:00.467
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

602
00:59:00.902 --> 00:59:01.672
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Avalos.

603
00:59:05.240 --> 00:59:11.250
<v Candace Avalos>I think that when it comes to evening meetings, for me it's more about what the goal is.

604
00:59:11.668 --> 00:59:29.242
<v Candace Avalos>And to me, the goal is increasing the participation of I obviously understand the logistical restraints, the feelings of— I definitely agree that there's no way I could support this amendment that currently, as it states, would be a full day, right?

605
00:59:29.322 --> 00:59:30.960
<v Candace Avalos>A whole morning and an evening meeting.

606
00:59:31.009 --> 00:59:34.382
<v Candace Avalos>I think that's more untenable for both staff and for us.

607
00:59:35.248 --> 00:59:44.992
<v Candace Avalos>But the broader goal of this amendment being reducing our amount of council meetings from 2 in the evening to 1, I do not support.

608
00:59:45.585 --> 00:59:56.764
<v Candace Avalos>I understand and respect the staff impact, but also this is a new council, we have new expectations, and I don't think that our desire to increase the people's voice and representation in council should be prohibited by a staffing issue.

609
00:59:57.469 --> 00:59:58.929
<v Candace Avalos>So I will not be supporting this amendment.

610
00:59:59.056 --> 01:00:05.280
<v Candace Avalos>I would like to continue to have 2 evening meetings, or I would like to, I guess, start since we don't currently have that.

611
01:00:06.050 --> 01:00:12.652
<v Candace Avalos>I want to increase the amount of opportunities people have to engage with us in off hours.

612
01:00:15.500 --> 01:00:16.177
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

613
01:00:18.119 --> 01:00:21.789
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Zimmerman, have you spoken to this amendment?

614
01:00:21.951 --> 01:00:22.679
<v Eric Zimmerman>Ryan should speak.

615
01:00:22.985 --> 01:00:24.295
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, perfect.

616
01:00:24.456 --> 01:00:24.990
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Ryan.

617
01:00:26.721 --> 01:00:33.652
<v Dan Ryan>Council President, I like the consistency we're offering Portlanders with council meetings on Wednesdays, with one Wednesday being an evening meeting.

618
01:00:34.021 --> 01:00:35.161
<v Dan Ryan>I think that would simplify this.

619
01:00:36.478 --> 01:00:37.777
<v Dan Ryan>You like that friendly amendment?

620
01:00:37.922 --> 01:00:38.099
<v Rebecca Dobert>Yep.

621
01:00:38.742 --> 01:00:40.748
<v Dan Ryan>Councilor Smith likes that friendly amendment.

622
01:00:41.150 --> 01:00:46.577
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is that the same as the amendment Councilor Clark was proposing, or are you proposing something different?

623
01:00:46.914 --> 01:00:48.134
<v Dan Ryan>No, no, it's, it's different.

624
01:00:48.231 --> 01:00:49.949
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So, okay, why don't you lay it out for us?

625
01:00:49.996 --> 01:00:52.934
<v Dan Ryan>This one, C, is we have a council meeting every Wednesday.

626
01:00:53.737 --> 01:00:56.885
<v Dan Ryan>One Wednesday a month we have council after dark.

627
01:00:56.949 --> 01:00:57.815
<v Dan Ryan>You know, we have an evening meeting.

628
01:00:58.956 --> 01:01:00.336
<v Dan Ryan>Sorry, college football's starting soon.

629
01:01:00.818 --> 01:01:01.090
<v Dan Ryan>Yeah.

630
01:01:01.717 --> 01:01:06.869
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So, Councilor, that would be instead of a morning meeting that day, we would have the evening meeting that day.

631
01:01:06.918 --> 01:01:07.094
<v Dan Ryan>Yes.

632
01:01:07.318 --> 01:01:11.862
<v Dan Ryan>And then I think that provides— council meetings are, are on Wednesdays, and then once a month we have an evening one.

633
01:01:12.295 --> 01:01:12.856
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Excellent.

634
01:01:14.222 --> 01:01:16.548
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, are you offering that as a friendly amendment?

635
01:01:16.789 --> 01:01:17.768
<v Dan Ryan>I am, especially now.

636
01:01:17.914 --> 01:01:20.402
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, and Councilor Smith, I believe, has accepted that.

637
01:01:20.947 --> 01:01:27.469
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And who was our second on the— Councilor Ryan, you were the second on Councilor Smith's original yes, absolutely.

638
01:01:27.516 --> 01:01:28.554
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Amendment, correct?

639
01:01:28.797 --> 01:01:29.219
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Perfect.

640
01:01:29.672 --> 01:01:30.579
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

641
01:01:30.838 --> 01:01:33.610
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So this has been changed.

642
01:01:33.657 --> 01:01:46.331
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>This proposal has been changed by a friendly amendment to be one evening meeting a month, and we would not have the morning meeting that day.

643
01:01:46.539 --> 01:01:50.751
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I believe that this has been proposed for the 3rd Wednesday.

644
01:01:51.137 --> 01:01:51.927
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is that correct?

645
01:01:52.106 --> 01:01:53.492
<v Dan Ryan>Yeah, whatever it was earlier, it was the 3rd.

646
01:01:53.557 --> 01:01:53.880
<v Dan Ryan>Yeah.

647
01:01:54.380 --> 01:02:01.014
<v Dan Ryan>This offers consistency for Portlanders, offers efficiency for our staff, and also it's cost sensitive.

648
01:02:01.880 --> 01:02:02.074
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

649
01:02:02.871 --> 01:02:03.588
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Zimmerman.

650
01:02:05.246 --> 01:02:05.507
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thanks.

651
01:02:05.719 --> 01:02:08.387
<v Eric Zimmerman>I, I think that's a fine, friendly amendment.

652
01:02:09.340 --> 01:02:14.208
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think it brings up an important piece here, and this is, this is why I care a lot that we have one night meeting.

653
01:02:14.936 --> 01:02:26.471
<v Eric Zimmerman>And it really gets to, we can either talk about supporting the employees who support us, or we can take action to support the employees who support us.

654
01:02:26.744 --> 01:02:37.625
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I think that taking action to limit the number of night meetings is one of those actions that reduces strain on a pretty significant apparatus to keep this animal alive.

655
01:02:38.684 --> 01:02:58.659
<v Eric Zimmerman>Um, it also really matters— there, I just want to highlight, there are a couple of with this many consistent meetings on every Wednesday, we have got to have a clear stop time on more days.

656
01:02:58.916 --> 01:03:03.536
<v Eric Zimmerman>We have, we have blown the finish line on more meetings than we've met it, I feel like.

657
01:03:04.585 --> 01:03:11.360
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I think that, that, that trend has reared its head in this document alone just by outlining the 9 PM stop time.

658
01:03:11.409 --> 01:03:11.829
<v Eric Zimmerman>Councilor Dan Ryan.

659
01:03:11.952 --> 01:03:13.458
<v Eric Zimmerman>Stop time that was highlighted.

660
01:03:13.539 --> 01:03:32.567
<v Eric Zimmerman>There's obviously an appetite for that, which if, if the presiding officer is able to hold these times and be consistent on that, that's part of why I was okay with both a morning meeting and then a night meeting, because I, I think it would be unhealthy to go from 9:30 until 9 at night.

661
01:03:33.032 --> 01:03:37.760
<v Eric Zimmerman>But 3 hours and then many hours later, starting 6 hours later, starting again, that sent— that felt palatable.

662
01:03:37.809 --> 01:03:37.920
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

663
01:03:38.646 --> 01:03:40.489
<v Eric Zimmerman>But I like the change that's been made.

664
01:03:40.586 --> 01:04:06.108
<v Eric Zimmerman>But it still has this underlying piece of, I think, reducing chaotic schedules, recognizing that a lot of folks keep us working and keep this dais alive, and that we, in the way we do or do not find the end of a meeting and think, We have to get through it.

665
01:04:07.005 --> 01:04:09.858
<v Eric Zimmerman>Most of the time, there will always be another meeting.

666
01:04:10.371 --> 01:04:14.842
<v Eric Zimmerman>There are very few things that can't be tabled until the next meeting if we've blown through it.

667
01:04:15.802 --> 01:04:21.539
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I recognize that that will happen, but to some other councilors' points, we're going to have so many more opportunities for this.

668
01:04:22.148 --> 01:04:29.664
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think we need to lean into it and do our, our best to apply the principles about the nighttime meeting of finish up the last item.

669
01:04:29.713 --> 01:04:30.001
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

670
01:04:31.567 --> 01:04:37.248
<v Eric Zimmerman>Or finish up the item that is open and then call it and apply that as much as we can stringently.

671
01:04:37.539 --> 01:04:43.971
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I'm not in favor of putting it in code, but I think it is a presiding officer's prerogative to help us stick to those timelines.

672
01:04:44.405 --> 01:04:48.637
<v Eric Zimmerman>It's about a 3-hour, maybe a 4-hour at most when we have these daytime morning meetings.

673
01:04:49.427 --> 01:05:01.255
<v Eric Zimmerman>So I think that we should take seriously, both in this conversation as well as when we get into committees, the impacts that we are having on the rest of the support staff who keep this council alive.

674
01:05:01.320 --> 01:05:01.626
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

675
01:05:04.260 --> 01:05:05.083
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

676
01:05:05.164 --> 01:05:09.777
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Smith, we'll get right back to you, but we've had 2 people join the queue who haven't spoken yet to the amendment.

677
01:05:10.579 --> 01:05:11.561
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, Councilor Kanal.

678
01:05:12.463 --> 01:05:13.413
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Madam President.

679
01:05:13.574 --> 01:05:15.666
<v Sameer Kanal>I will be voting no on this amendment.

680
01:05:15.827 --> 01:05:23.387
<v Sameer Kanal>I appreciate that it has been improved, I think, by Councilor Ryan's friendly amendment to the amendment, but I think the underlying point Councilor Sameer Kanal.

681
01:05:23.436 --> 01:05:23.836
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Mr. Mayor.

682
01:05:23.916 --> 01:05:26.465
<v Sameer Kanal>I think the point that Councilor Avalos raised is still compelling to me.

683
01:05:26.514 --> 01:05:28.309
<v Sameer Kanal>So I just want to step back for a second.

684
01:05:28.726 --> 01:05:34.514
<v Sameer Kanal>We budgeted in the budget for 2 evening meetings of some part of the council per month.

685
01:05:34.978 --> 01:05:36.293
<v Sameer Kanal>That's already approved.

686
01:05:36.822 --> 01:05:37.831
<v Sameer Kanal>It has been funded.

687
01:05:38.762 --> 01:05:53.731
<v Sameer Kanal>There were some parameters on that that needed to be created around not having a 6 o'clock meeting end up going till 11:13 like our first one did, that the point that the portion of the document which Councilor Zimmerman just mentioned, the soft stop, addresses.

688
01:05:54.324 --> 01:06:02.454
<v Sameer Kanal>The question here is not whether we have 2 night meetings a month or 1, because it's not about— that's not the underlying question.

689
01:06:02.503 --> 01:06:08.110
<v Sameer Kanal>The underlying question is whether that second evening meeting is for the full council or would be reserved for a committee.

690
01:06:08.849 --> 01:06:11.469
<v Sameer Kanal>Either way, it's funded and it is going to be staffed.

691
01:06:11.516 --> 01:06:14.635
<v Sameer Kanal>That's already approved in June, that there would be 2 meetings a month.

692
01:06:14.682 --> 01:06:14.795
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

693
01:06:14.891 --> 01:06:20.793
<v Sameer Kanal>Some portion of this council in the evening, whether it's the full council or a committee, is yet to be determined.

694
01:06:21.530 --> 01:06:34.023
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, secondly, the consistency argument— it is equally consistent to say morning, morning, evening, morning, or morning, evening, morning, evening if it's the same thing every month.

695
01:06:34.440 --> 01:06:36.027
<v Sameer Kanal>Neither is more consistent than the other.

696
01:06:36.925 --> 01:06:51.501
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, so I think as long as the adoption of this ordinance in some form will create that consistency in a way that improves upon the current practice, which I appreciate from the Council President, of augmenting our additional schedule with special meetings.

697
01:06:51.710 --> 01:06:51.869
<v Rebecca Dobert>Okay.

698
01:06:52.590 --> 01:07:03.461
<v Sameer Kanal>So given all of that, the real question here is fundamentally, do we want a second meeting in the evening to be for a committee, which would be inconsistent which committee it would be, right?

699
01:07:03.557 --> 01:07:09.987
<v Sameer Kanal>That would change over time, which would be not necessarily— we have no understanding of what the process for yes.

700
01:07:10.052 --> 01:07:12.476
<v Sameer Kanal>Determining that would be because we haven't built one yet.

701
01:07:12.925 --> 01:07:20.215
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, or do we want it to be for where the people come, which is the council, which is the full council as it has been for decades and it should remain?

702
01:07:20.873 --> 01:07:35.597
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, and I have seen the patterns of who comes and how many people come in the evening for the full council versus the daytime meetings, and it is very, very clear that there is more appetite for the evening meetings on the whole.

703
01:07:36.206 --> 01:07:46.791
<v Sameer Kanal>And I, in particular, after, as the council president has noted, her choice to schedule, I think in a really good way, those items that are of public concern primarily in the evenings.

704
01:07:47.449 --> 01:07:49.650
<v Sameer Kanal>So with that said, I'll be voting no on it.

705
01:07:49.778 --> 01:07:57.873
<v Sameer Kanal>I think we need to retain the idea that this entire purpose of this enterprise is to feed, is to serve the people.

706
01:07:58.789 --> 01:08:01.728
<v Sameer Kanal>And we've already addressed much of the staff concerns, but fundamentally, Councilor Smith.

707
01:08:02.003 --> 01:08:11.559
<v Sameer Kanal>We've lost the fact that, that having people be able to come and testify here before their elected representatives, all 12 of us, is the underlying purpose of, of this entire enterprise.

708
01:08:12.320 --> 01:08:12.496
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks.

709
01:08:15.068 --> 01:08:15.795
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

710
01:08:15.876 --> 01:08:16.685
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Morillo.

711
01:08:19.014 --> 01:08:21.390
<v Angelita Morillo>Um, Councilor Kanal actually answered most of my questions.

712
01:08:21.439 --> 01:08:28.520
<v Angelita Morillo>I was going to ask logistically what it's going to take to adjust the budget, uh, if we were to have 2 evening council meetings.

713
01:08:28.569 --> 01:08:32.948
<v Angelita Morillo>So hearing that we have already budgeted for that makes me feel better about this.

714
01:08:33.043 --> 01:08:46.081
<v Angelita Morillo>I completely agree that we do need to have more evening meetings because there are very different types of people that are able to attend in the middle of the day versus people who are— who I've seen come at council at evening meetings.

715
01:08:46.658 --> 01:08:51.757
<v Angelita Morillo>I am also perfectly fine with Councilor Ryan's friendly amendment to this.

716
01:08:51.805 --> 01:08:53.056
<v Angelita Morillo>I think it was common sense.

717
01:08:54.034 --> 01:09:09.462
<v Angelita Morillo>And I agree with Councilor Zimmerman as well that there— we do need to have some limits so that people are at their best when we're on the dais and that our staff can also, you know, have lives that they are organizing around work and they know exactly when things are going to end.

718
01:09:09.527 --> 01:09:16.645
<v Angelita Morillo>But overall, we do want evening engagement for council meetings and ideally one day for committee meetings as well.

719
01:09:16.725 --> 01:09:18.372
<v Angelita Morillo>So I'll be supportive of this.

720
01:09:18.551 --> 01:09:18.890
<v Angelita Morillo>Thanks.

721
01:09:20.668 --> 01:09:21.429
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

722
01:09:22.609 --> 01:09:23.595
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Novick.

723
01:09:25.899 --> 01:09:34.525
<v Steve Novick>Yeah, I just, I think that the number of items where it's the people want to come in the evening to talk about them is limited.

724
01:09:35.463 --> 01:09:42.498
<v Steve Novick>So I just intuitively think that having one night a month is going to be enough to satisfy that desire.

725
01:09:43.048 --> 01:10:01.856
<v Steve Novick>And I'm curious if Councilor Avalos or Councilor Kanal can come up with examples of in the past 6 months of an item which should have been heard at an evening meeting but was heard at a day meeting, and therefore you think that that limited what would have been robust public input.

726
01:10:03.880 --> 01:10:05.056
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor, would you like to respond?

727
01:10:05.137 --> 01:10:07.122
<v Sameer Kanal>I don't want to use my second attempt, but—.

728
01:10:07.380 --> 01:10:10.042
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

729
01:10:10.266 --> 01:10:12.912
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Avalos, would you like to respond briefly?

730
01:10:13.412 --> 01:10:14.975
<v Candace Avalos>I don't have a specific example.

731
01:10:15.199 --> 01:10:16.181
<v Candace Avalos>I don't think I need one.

732
01:10:16.310 --> 01:10:29.185
<v Candace Avalos>I don't think we've even gotten— we've even scratched the surface of the types of topics So I'm looking to the future of how we're setting up a system for people to engage with us.

733
01:10:29.250 --> 01:10:32.332
<v Candace Avalos>So I don't think that an example is necessarily relevant.

734
01:10:32.478 --> 01:10:39.613
<v Candace Avalos>I don't have a specific one other than, I guess, the second Councilor Kanal to say this one is probably the best example I come up with on the spot.

735
01:10:42.814 --> 01:10:44.177
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Novick, anything further?

736
01:10:45.115 --> 01:10:45.987
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Koyama Lane?

737
01:10:47.573 --> 01:10:57.828
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'd like to start with saying I do appreciate, Council President, how you've been intentional about putting items that seem to have a lot of public interest for evening meetings, scheduling them then.

738
01:11:00.993 --> 01:11:10.988
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I like the idea of having the option to be able to, for the public to meet us, come meet, come before us 2 times a month in the evening.

739
01:11:13.731 --> 01:11:21.688
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I— it's— we don't necessarily have to use both of those, especially as you're very intentional about scheduling.

740
01:11:22.672 --> 01:11:24.819
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>They could always be taken off the schedule.

741
01:11:25.271 --> 01:11:29.920
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>It's always easier to take something off the schedule, cancel it, than to try to fit it in.

742
01:11:31.465 --> 01:11:42.149
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>As this is now, I do not plan to support it without seeing that it's in writing and it's clear that the public could meet us in the evening 2 times a month.

743
01:11:46.599 --> 01:11:57.140
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor, are you referring to having a committee slot in writing somewhere, or are you referring to council meetings when you say having something in writing?

744
01:11:57.900 --> 01:12:04.309
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Having a committee slot and having a real clear outline of what that would look like and how committees would sign up for that.

745
01:12:04.373 --> 01:12:13.882
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I know that part of the next thank you.

746
01:12:15.692 --> 01:12:16.623
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Smith.

747
01:12:18.826 --> 01:12:19.725
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you, Madam President.

748
01:12:19.789 --> 01:12:22.554
<v Loretta Smith>I, I think it goes back to what Councilor Zimmerman said.

749
01:12:22.682 --> 01:12:30.515
<v Loretta Smith>If we start taking things off the agenda, then people don't have a sense that this is a regular occurrence.

750
01:12:30.609 --> 01:12:30.721
<v Candace Avalos>Yes.

751
01:12:31.139 --> 01:12:36.125
<v Loretta Smith>So putting things on and off as we feel, that's, that's not a, that's not a good option.

752
01:12:36.734 --> 01:12:44.447
<v Loretta Smith>We need to be able to give the public 3 days, 3 days a month when we're going to meet, and then that one day for the evening.

753
01:12:44.511 --> 01:13:03.371
<v Loretta Smith>Now, there are going to be some extraordinarily special meetings that may not be a committee meeting or may not be a, um, a council meeting that is of public interest that we might need to have a an evening meeting that all of us are here for.

754
01:13:04.094 --> 01:13:10.050
<v Loretta Smith>So it may be a work session that people are highly interested in that we have at night.

755
01:13:10.515 --> 01:13:13.869
<v Loretta Smith>So I think we need to have the flexibility to do that.

756
01:13:14.030 --> 01:13:25.797
<v Loretta Smith>But I think, as Councilor Ryan said, his friendly amendment is probably our best bet to keeping things very simple and having a routine.

757
01:13:25.862 --> 01:13:26.055
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

758
01:13:26.551 --> 01:13:30.610
<v Loretta Smith>So that people can get used to a routine of when we're actually meeting.

759
01:13:30.867 --> 01:13:32.181
<v Loretta Smith>Because right now we don't have that.

760
01:13:32.310 --> 01:13:33.819
<v Loretta Smith>It's all over the place.

761
01:13:34.412 --> 01:13:37.139
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

762
01:13:38.085 --> 01:13:40.234
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dunphy, I don't believe you've spoken to this amendment yet.

763
01:13:40.283 --> 01:13:40.828
<v Jamie Dunphy>I have not.

764
01:13:40.891 --> 01:13:41.261
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you.

765
01:13:41.710 --> 01:13:46.121
<v Jamie Dunphy>You know, colleagues, I am going to be supportive of the Smith Amendment as changed.

766
01:13:46.747 --> 01:13:51.014
<v Jamie Dunphy>I am not right now inclined to have 2 evening meetings a month.

767
01:13:51.173 --> 01:13:54.125
<v Jamie Dunphy>I don't think that we have yet demonstrated as a body that that is necessary.

768
01:13:54.622 --> 01:14:03.511
<v Jamie Dunphy>We have the budget in order to have 2 evening events happen, meaning a council meeting and potentially a committee meeting, potentially a special hearing.

769
01:14:04.590 --> 01:14:05.845
<v Jamie Dunphy>We can always change our rules.

770
01:14:05.942 --> 01:14:11.157
<v Jamie Dunphy>We will inevitably change our rules in the next 6 months when we decide that what we're agreeing on today isn't working for us.

771
01:14:14.824 --> 01:14:19.469
<v Jamie Dunphy>I don't feel like we have yet reached a point in our flow where that is quite necessary.

772
01:14:19.518 --> 01:14:21.711
<v Jamie Dunphy>So I will be supportive of having one evening meeting.

773
01:14:21.759 --> 01:14:21.984
<v Rebecca Dobert>Councilor Dan Ryan.

774
01:14:22.396 --> 01:14:36.615
<v Jamie Dunphy>I also am very supportive of the idea of intentionally building in space for committee meetings in the evenings, especially because I think as we progress this conversation further, we will see the definitions of why we have committees being a little bit more clear.

775
01:14:37.082 --> 01:14:39.810
<v Jamie Dunphy>And so I will be supportive of this amendment.

776
01:14:39.922 --> 01:14:42.715
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

777
01:14:42.939 --> 01:14:45.219
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Clark.

778
01:14:46.407 --> 01:14:47.899
<v Olivia Clark>I'm sorry, did you call me?

779
01:14:48.252 --> 01:14:49.101
<v Candace Avalos>Okay, good.

780
01:14:50.239 --> 01:15:00.020
<v Olivia Clark>I just want to remind people that it's not just the council clerk's office, it's not just BTS, and it's not just security that is supporting us.

781
01:15:00.502 --> 01:15:04.719
<v Olivia Clark>It's all the people in the bureaus, and we have seen them here.

782
01:15:04.990 --> 01:15:11.068
<v Olivia Clark>We don't always see them here because they're over in the Portland building listening to us and being on call in case we have a question.

783
01:15:11.501 --> 01:15:16.519
<v Olivia Clark>And we forget that those are costs too, that all those— I'm afraid we're going to burn those people out.

784
01:15:17.720 --> 01:15:24.604
<v Olivia Clark>And that's an ongoing concern I have, if we haven't already burnt them out by our endless debating about things.

785
01:15:26.100 --> 01:15:28.832
<v Olivia Clark>But I'm pro the one meeting, just be clear.

786
01:15:29.161 --> 01:15:29.966
<v Olivia Clark>Just want to remind people.

787
01:15:31.539 --> 01:15:33.181
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor, for bringing that up.

788
01:15:33.360 --> 01:15:40.779
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I do think that that's one of the places where the impact difference between committees and Council is clear.

789
01:15:42.042 --> 01:15:42.626
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Morillo.

790
01:15:46.221 --> 01:15:58.145
<v Angelita Morillo>I just wanted to push back on the idea, or maybe answer Councilor Novick's question regarding matters of public interest, because I think that there have been quite a lot, but we haven't always had an opportunity to do an evening meeting.

791
01:15:58.722 --> 01:16:06.353
<v Angelita Morillo>The top 3 that came to mind for me were the Zenith resolution, the algorithmic price fixing ban, which I will be bringing back.

792
01:16:07.154 --> 01:16:11.225
<v Angelita Morillo>Anything regarding ICE right now is going to be a huge matter of public interest.

793
01:16:11.882 --> 01:16:17.319
<v Angelita Morillo>The Portland Street Response resolution, the Albina settlement, any of the police settlements.

794
01:16:17.399 --> 01:16:22.033
<v Angelita Morillo>I'm sure we will have a lot of people coming in if we have it more publicly available.

795
01:16:23.028 --> 01:16:41.283
<v Angelita Morillo>So I think that there are a lot of matters of public interest, and what I have seen in my committee meetings, even with people who I agree with and like, is that the people who can come and testify generally are either wealthy, retired, Or they tend to be lobbyists for organizations and they're paid.

796
01:16:41.381 --> 01:16:48.030
<v Angelita Morillo>And again, those could be people I agree with and like, but you get a different type of person that comes in in the evening meetings.

797
01:16:48.769 --> 01:17:02.695
<v Angelita Morillo>And I think that that's really important and valuable for us as a council to hear, because during our committee meetings too, it's different when the full body of council is hearing the testimony than it is when someone is reading off to you.

798
01:17:02.743 --> 01:17:03.001
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

799
01:17:03.787 --> 01:17:09.221
<v Angelita Morillo>Hey, the staff summary says that 12 people testified and they were all strongly in favor of this because of XYZ.

800
01:17:09.719 --> 01:17:20.029
<v Angelita Morillo>That doesn't have the same emotional impact for us as legislators and leaders as it does when you are face to face with your community and you have to answer them and you have to look them in the eyes and say yes or no on something.

801
01:17:20.542 --> 01:17:27.805
<v Angelita Morillo>So I think that, um, overall having 2 evening meetings that we have already budgeted for is reasonable.

802
01:17:28.319 --> 01:17:37.877
<v Angelita Morillo>I think there will be lots of matters of public interest as long as we thank you, Councilor.

803
01:17:38.006 --> 01:17:47.805
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I hesitated to get in the queue, but I do think that it's important to note that as we talk about accessibility of meetings, evening meetings are really important.

804
01:17:47.854 --> 01:17:57.011
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>There are people who can come who can't come during the day, but we shouldn't assume that people who work are better off coming to an evening meeting than during the day.

805
01:17:57.113 --> 01:17:59.484
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have members of our community who work shift work.

806
01:17:59.582 --> 01:18:07.744
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have members of our community who work in, um, hospitality and entertainment industries for whom a daytime meeting actually can be better.

807
01:18:08.131 --> 01:18:18.710
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, and I just want to make sure that we are not making assumptions about who has access to what types— times of day, um, thinking only about people who work 9 to 5.

808
01:18:20.335 --> 01:18:22.869
<v Angelita Morillo>Well, yes, I think I was talking— Councilor, it was a broader comment.

809
01:18:26.385 --> 01:18:38.516
<v Loretta Smith>Yes, I do have a written up, um, amendment, and I, I'd like to move to amend this ordinance by replacing A1 and A2 with the following.

810
01:18:39.033 --> 01:18:49.462
<v Loretta Smith>Number 1, on the 1st, 2nd— on the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and any 5th Wednesday of each month beginning at 9:30 AM 2.

811
01:18:50.094 --> 01:18:53.863
<v Loretta Smith>On the 3rd Wednesday of each month beginning at 6 PM.

812
01:18:55.173 --> 01:19:05.976
<v Loretta Smith>And amend the ordinance by inserting a new Section A.3 and renumbering the current A.3 to A.4.

813
01:19:06.574 --> 01:19:13.453
<v Loretta Smith>Any regular meeting that is recessed with unheard agenda items will continue at 2 PM the following Thursday.

814
01:19:13.534 --> 01:19:13.680
<v Candace Avalos>Second.

815
01:19:15.150 --> 01:19:19.194
<v Loretta Smith>That is just the housekeeping rule that I didn't have in before.

816
01:19:20.739 --> 01:19:21.417
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

817
01:19:21.561 --> 01:19:25.627
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And if your team can share that with everybody and get it to the clerk, that would be helpful.

818
01:19:26.460 --> 01:19:26.751
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you.

819
01:19:27.122 --> 01:19:27.833
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal.

820
01:19:30.113 --> 01:19:30.987
<v Sameer Kanal>Uh, 2 things.

821
01:19:31.083 --> 01:19:32.296
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Madam President.

822
01:19:32.457 --> 01:19:45.782
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, first, I appreciate the point you made, Madam President, and I— it gave me an opportunity to, to mention why, because I was asked earlier, why is it alternating for first and third, second and fourth, as opposed to some other form of configuration there.

823
01:19:46.863 --> 01:19:49.057
<v Sameer Kanal>And it relates to your point about shift work.

824
01:19:49.106 --> 01:19:53.287
<v Sameer Kanal>And I remember I've worked retail, I've worked hospitality, I've had different schedules.

825
01:19:55.305 --> 01:19:57.543
<v Sameer Kanal>Ordinances are generally heard in 2 successive meetings.

826
01:19:57.720 --> 01:20:08.065
<v Sameer Kanal>So having the opportunity for one of those 2 meetings to be in the evening allows for at least those regardless of schedule to take part in some way in part of that conversation.

827
01:20:08.114 --> 01:20:08.213
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you.

828
01:20:09.006 --> 01:20:16.345
<v Sameer Kanal>And so I do think that that variety, as Councilor Murillo brought up, is vital to ensuring that everyone can participate.

829
01:20:17.099 --> 01:20:29.181
<v Sameer Kanal>The other thing I'll note, and I was not aware of this until Councilor Smith just read the new text, is that we would be eliminating the Wednesday afternoon recessed meetings in the text that was just read.

830
01:20:29.759 --> 01:20:40.738
<v Sameer Kanal>And so, yes, because the third part, the new A3, says that any A meeting that was recessed with unfinished items would be resumed at 2 o'clock on Thursday.

831
01:20:41.074 --> 01:20:41.412
<v Loretta Smith>Right.

832
01:20:42.037 --> 01:20:51.927
<v Sameer Kanal>Which means that the 2 o'clock that you can see currently in A1 as currently read, recess session of a Wednesday morning meeting will be held at 2 PM on that Wednesday.

833
01:20:52.632 --> 01:21:06.047
<v Sameer Kanal>So that Wednesday meeting for the 3 or 4, however many Wednesdays a month in which there is a morning meeting, would go away with this amendment, which is another reason I think that, that it, it should be, um, voted no on.

834
01:21:07.523 --> 01:21:07.779
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

835
01:21:08.404 --> 01:21:09.125
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

836
01:21:09.204 --> 01:21:13.500
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Smith, are you raising your hand with a correction on your amendment?

837
01:21:13.547 --> 01:21:23.627
<v Loretta Smith>Right, we would still, even on the, on the morning meetings, if we need to, um, if we need to recess, we still have the ability to do that on Thursday at 2 o'clock.

838
01:21:24.507 --> 01:21:38.801
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Right now and on the So in the proposed calendar ideas that have been sent out, Councilor Smith, we have the option of a Wednesday afternoon recess or a Thursday afternoon recess.

839
01:21:39.009 --> 01:21:40.498
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That's in code currently.

840
01:21:41.252 --> 01:21:50.993
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We haven't generally used the Wednesday afternoon recess, but I could foresee us using the Wednesday afternoon recess after a morning meeting.

841
01:21:51.667 --> 01:22:00.734
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We would not use that Wednesday afternoon time after, on weeks when we had an evening meeting on those weeks, we would obviously just use that Thursday afternoon time.

842
01:22:01.360 --> 01:22:14.756
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So I think the question is whether you are intending to limit those options or whether you're intending to maintain the status quo option of a Wednesday or Thursday afternoon recess except on weeks when we have an evening meeting.

843
01:22:15.496 --> 01:22:17.520
<v Loretta Smith>Yes, that sounds good.

844
01:22:18.644 --> 01:22:22.609
<v Loretta Smith>Councilor Zimmerman, Can you enter this conversation?

845
01:22:22.738 --> 01:22:26.319
<v Loretta Smith>Because I think that that would— is he for a point of order?

846
01:22:27.154 --> 01:22:32.693
<v Eric Zimmerman>Yeah, so I think that your amendment with the Thursday option is, is the important part here.

847
01:22:32.917 --> 01:22:46.548
<v Eric Zimmerman>I mean, I think that this— what we're getting at here is the, the Wednesday option, basically 2 hours after maybe we took a break on the current Wednesday, is, is not a great practice.

848
01:22:46.886 --> 01:22:46.998
<v Candace Avalos>Right.

849
01:22:47.078 --> 01:22:50.533
<v Eric Zimmerman>It turns into an all-day meeting, and I think that's part of what we're solving here.

850
01:22:51.399 --> 01:23:07.222
<v Eric Zimmerman>It allows the presiding officer to say, come back on the Thursday, and I think that's a healthier rhythm instead of take your half hour, because we never seem to end when we should, and then come back 30 minutes later.

851
01:23:07.302 --> 01:23:11.046
<v Eric Zimmerman>That is where we're in these all-day meetings when they should have just been a morning meeting.

852
01:23:11.479 --> 01:23:19.655
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so I think Councilor Smith's option of Thursday is the important and not this doubling up on Wednesday piece.

853
01:23:20.217 --> 01:23:29.646
<v Loretta Smith>Right, because it says any regular meeting that is recessed with unheard agenda items will continue at 2:00 PM the following Thursday, whether it be a night or a morning meeting.

854
01:23:31.851 --> 01:23:34.935
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think that's a healthier rhythm for everybody involved.

855
01:23:39.872 --> 01:23:42.502
<v Eric Zimmerman>I also would like to— my— the reason I really had my hand in there was to say that I think that's a good idea.

856
01:23:43.319 --> 01:23:47.409
<v Eric Zimmerman>I don't even know what we call it anymore, but limit debate to anybody in the queue and let's move on to a vote.

857
01:23:48.864 --> 01:23:49.543
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

858
01:23:49.851 --> 01:23:57.750
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think that it is important for folks to see this in writing because it's making more changes, Councilor, than you had originally shared.

859
01:23:57.829 --> 01:24:00.048
<v Loretta Smith>If my staff is listening, please send that to the clerk.

860
01:24:01.042 --> 01:24:02.372
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, do we have that in the mail?

861
01:24:02.421 --> 01:24:04.032
<v Loretta Smith>And send it to the entire council.

862
01:24:06.002 --> 01:24:08.596
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It sounds like we may have just sent that out.

863
01:24:09.015 --> 01:24:09.743
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

864
01:24:10.293 --> 01:24:13.467
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, thank you to Elijah.

865
01:24:14.890 --> 01:24:15.197
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor—.

866
01:24:15.327 --> 01:24:15.942
<v Loretta Smith>Okay, this— that's it.

867
01:24:15.990 --> 01:24:16.800
<v Loretta Smith>No, this is the same thing.

868
01:24:16.930 --> 01:24:21.511
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, so let's give everybody a minute to look at what is in writing here.

869
01:24:22.936 --> 01:24:28.481
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I believe that everybody has had at least 2 opportunities to speak to this.

870
01:24:31.079 --> 01:24:32.650
<v Rebecca Dobert>Can I—.

871
01:24:32.650 --> 01:24:42.221
<v Sameer Kanal>Councilor Kanal, do you have I hadn't finished, but this, this was— I got interrupted at the end there with the information, so can I finish the thought?

872
01:24:42.606 --> 01:24:42.815
<v Angelita Morillo>Please.

873
01:24:43.233 --> 01:24:49.078
<v Sameer Kanal>Uh, in 2024, this council met 36 or 45 hours a month.

874
01:24:49.189 --> 01:24:56.431
<v Sameer Kanal>This is assuming the normal cadence of 3-hour, um, meetings with the recesses built in, and that was the maximum.

875
01:24:56.479 --> 01:24:57.957
<v Sameer Kanal>Sometimes they didn't take the recess meeting.

876
01:24:58.422 --> 01:25:00.606
<v Sameer Kanal>In 2025, we met 15 hours a month.

877
01:25:01.231 --> 01:25:06.247
<v Sameer Kanal>This proposal, the underlying ordinance would go back to 30 or 39 hours a month.

878
01:25:06.296 --> 01:25:08.490
<v Sameer Kanal>So it's still fewer than in preceding years.

879
01:25:08.587 --> 01:25:13.219
<v Sameer Kanal>And that's because there's no opportunity for 2 recess meetings on an evening meeting.

880
01:25:14.195 --> 01:26:06.775
<v Sameer Kanal>And the amendment that's being proposed right now, given that reduction of the Wednesday recess time, would reduce it to 24 or 30 hours a month, which is a significant change from all of the underlying numbers we just discussed, it reduces— we'd be adding only 9 hours of full council a month, which I think, given that we have increased the number of filers from 6 to 14 people who can initiate a document here, and we've increased the number of people who debate and discuss those proposals from 5 councilors, including the mayor, to now 12, there is a need to ensure that we're not going so far lower than what we've had in the past, uh, not to mention the underlying needs that was brought up in the testimony around public testimony.

881
01:26:07.408 --> 01:26:07.716
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

882
01:26:11.386 --> 01:26:12.238
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

883
01:26:14.506 --> 01:26:18.189
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, are there any other comments?

884
01:26:18.819 --> 01:26:21.011
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I, I would just—.

885
01:26:23.685 --> 01:26:35.082
<v Loretta Smith>Councilor Smith, correct the math on that, because if you add the Thursday meetings, that's an— that's another 3 hours, and 3 times, um, 4 is 12.

886
01:26:35.788 --> 01:26:39.288
<v Loretta Smith>With the other 4 meetings, that's 24.

887
01:26:40.962 --> 01:26:47.676
<v Loretta Smith>And but we do have the ability, if we need to, to go over on the Wednesday morning meetings.

888
01:26:50.569 --> 01:26:52.713
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So, okay.

889
01:26:55.054 --> 01:26:55.650
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

890
01:26:55.715 --> 01:27:01.574
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I see no one else in the queue, and I think we have all well more than exhausted our 2 speaking points each.

891
01:27:01.914 --> 01:27:10.047
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Rebecca, could you please call the roll on Councilor Smith's amendment, which I believe we now all have in writing?

892
01:27:16.109 --> 01:27:17.195
<v Rebecca Dobert>Sorry, I'm pulling it up.

893
01:27:22.746 --> 01:27:22.842
<v Unidentified speaker>No.

894
01:27:28.101 --> 01:27:29.222
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>No.

895
01:27:30.646 --> 01:27:30.824
<v Rebecca Dobert>Aye.

896
01:27:31.585 --> 01:27:31.617
<v Loretta Smith>Aye.

897
01:27:32.975 --> 01:27:33.119
<v Mitch Green>No.

898
01:27:35.076 --> 01:27:35.238
<v Steve Novick>Aye.

899
01:27:38.493 --> 01:27:38.752
<v Rebecca Dobert>No.

900
01:27:39.353 --> 01:27:39.483
<v Candace Avalos>Aye.

901
01:27:41.706 --> 01:27:41.755
<v Rebecca Dobert>Aye.

902
01:27:42.631 --> 01:27:43.604
<v Sameer Kanal>No.

903
01:27:47.310 --> 01:27:47.407
<v Rebecca Dobert>No.

904
01:27:47.778 --> 01:27:47.939
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Aye.

905
01:27:48.988 --> 01:27:51.701
<v Rebecca Dobert>And the amendment is approved with 7 aye and 5 nay votes.

906
01:27:55.220 --> 01:27:55.993
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, councilors.

907
01:27:57.800 --> 01:28:08.667
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, I believe Councilor Koyama Lane had proposed an amendment which has Councilor Koyama Lane, would you like to speak to that amendment?

908
01:28:08.862 --> 01:28:09.121
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Sure.

909
01:28:09.185 --> 01:28:09.945
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you, Madam President.

910
01:28:10.789 --> 01:28:30.274
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>So as part of the discussions that we're having around streamlining committees, possibly adding council meetings, I'm proposing an amendment to Section 3.02.020 titled Council Agenda to change the deadline for items being heard to be moved from 3 months to 45 days.

911
01:28:31.800 --> 01:28:38.114
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>There have been concerns raised about the length of time council items take to come before council once out of committee.

912
01:28:39.020 --> 01:28:40.942
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I hear some of these concerns.

913
01:28:41.216 --> 01:28:50.605
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>For example, as the timeline plays out, attachments may become irrelevant as well as losing urgency, and momentum can be lost on the issue itself.

914
01:28:51.436 --> 01:28:59.287
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>With this proposed council regular meeting schedule that we're suggesting, Today, we may no longer need the full 90 days.

915
01:28:59.655 --> 01:29:13.653
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>So goals for reducing that timeline include increased transparency and efficiency and limiting the amount of time needed for staff to track the status of any individual item and be ready without notice to present.

916
01:29:14.327 --> 01:29:17.565
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>So I look forward to this discussion around what you all think around this.

917
01:29:18.961 --> 01:29:19.729
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

918
01:29:20.323 --> 01:29:22.296
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And we do have a second on that already.

919
01:29:22.408 --> 01:29:29.220
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, is there any thank you, Madam President.

920
01:29:30.221 --> 01:29:32.599
<v Mitch Green>To me, this seems pretty straightforward and sensible.

921
01:29:32.792 --> 01:29:36.305
<v Mitch Green>We've doubled the amount of— we will double the amount of council meetings.

922
01:29:37.180 --> 01:29:39.255
<v Mitch Green>We should be able to schedule those within 45 days.

923
01:29:39.952 --> 01:29:41.360
<v Mitch Green>So I will plan to support these.

924
01:29:41.699 --> 01:29:42.023
<v Mitch Green>Thank you.

925
01:29:48.251 --> 01:29:49.764
<v Olivia Clark>I'm not so certain.

926
01:29:50.493 --> 01:29:59.569
<v Olivia Clark>I guess that we need to do that, that maybe we need to implement the additional council meetings first and then come back and reevaluate this.

927
01:30:01.380 --> 01:30:04.349
<v Olivia Clark>Um, so I'm torn.

928
01:30:04.784 --> 01:30:16.779
<v Olivia Clark>Um, I think I'll probably vote against it and hope that we have time to really see if our new, uh, council cycle works to, um, facilitate rapid movement.

929
01:30:16.975 --> 01:30:20.207
<v Olivia Clark>I don't know that we need to zero in on 45 days.

930
01:30:23.060 --> 01:30:23.574
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

931
01:30:23.655 --> 01:30:24.347
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Ryan.

932
01:30:25.090 --> 01:30:25.975
<v Dan Ryan>Thank you, Madam President.

933
01:30:26.297 --> 01:30:33.706
<v Dan Ryan>My concern here is that, have you had a conversation with Michael Jordan or the DCAs about your amendment?

934
01:30:37.023 --> 01:30:37.851
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I have not.

935
01:30:37.997 --> 01:30:39.363
<v Dan Ryan>That's, that's, thank you.

936
01:30:39.801 --> 01:30:45.860
<v Dan Ryan>And the reason I would want to talk to them about that, because I think what I keep hearing is the workload challenge.

937
01:30:46.261 --> 01:30:53.137
<v Dan Ryan>I also know Council President has reason to weigh in on why, as Council President, she's made some of those decisions.

938
01:30:54.195 --> 01:31:02.836
<v Dan Ryan>But I really think what I'm experiencing is sometimes we're not connecting with the staff who fundamentally have to implement what we're passing.

939
01:31:03.269 --> 01:31:09.809
<v Dan Ryan>And if we don't have time to socialize it and then work with them, it sometimes takes more than 45 days.

940
01:31:09.921 --> 01:31:11.605
<v Dan Ryan>Councilor yeah.

941
01:31:12.247 --> 01:31:14.238
<v Dan Ryan>So right now, that's my hesitation why I'd vote no.

942
01:31:14.478 --> 01:31:14.960
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I hear that.

943
01:31:15.055 --> 01:31:22.679
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I know that as governance leaders, we've talked about this idea and that was something that you brought forward, which is something that makes a lot of sense.

944
01:31:23.064 --> 01:31:27.060
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>So I know my team has reached out and started to ask about those conversations.

945
01:31:27.237 --> 01:31:29.099
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I haven't gotten to have them yet.

946
01:31:29.243 --> 01:31:30.992
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And what you're saying is very valid.

947
01:31:31.104 --> 01:31:31.442
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you.

948
01:31:31.762 --> 01:31:32.805
<v Dan Ryan>I so appreciate your candor.

949
01:31:32.934 --> 01:31:33.190
<v Dan Ryan>Thank you.

950
01:31:33.672 --> 01:31:35.421
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

951
01:31:35.518 --> 01:31:48.259
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I'll note that City Administrator Jordan is out this week, but acting in his stead is, um, um, I believe we have Sarah this week acting in his stead.

952
01:31:48.306 --> 01:31:51.603
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I apologize, I was thinking through the schedule because there's a few different people.

953
01:31:52.023 --> 01:31:55.072
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, I'm seeing if she's available to weigh in on that, Councilor.

954
01:31:55.747 --> 01:31:56.438
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Smith.

955
01:31:57.113 --> 01:31:58.045
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you, Madam President.

956
01:31:58.140 --> 01:32:07.998
<v Loretta Smith>And I, I would say ditto, ditto, ditto to Councilor Clark because we don't know the flow, and then we have to add this extra layer of if we're changing the committee system.

957
01:32:08.079 --> 01:32:10.470
<v Loretta Smith>So it's going to be harder to get out of committee.

958
01:32:10.711 --> 01:32:12.332
<v Loretta Smith>We're going to be in committees longer.

959
01:32:12.974 --> 01:32:14.930
<v Loretta Smith>So that's going to be a strain.

960
01:32:15.300 --> 01:32:21.365
<v Loretta Smith>So I would suggest us getting into the flow of what we're going to be doing in terms of our infrastructure.

961
01:32:21.783 --> 01:32:28.811
<v Loretta Smith>So we know if 45 days is the, the actual timeline, and we may need to expand it to 120 days.

962
01:32:29.229 --> 01:32:40.485
<v Loretta Smith>I don't know, but we need to figure out how to how to manage what all this, all these new changes and look to see if our levers that we're trying to put in place, if it's going to be appropriate.

963
01:32:40.533 --> 01:32:43.548
<v Loretta Smith>So I agree with Councilor Clark.

964
01:32:43.854 --> 01:32:44.306
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

965
01:32:46.659 --> 01:32:47.402
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

966
01:32:47.483 --> 01:32:48.983
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Green.

967
01:32:50.795 --> 01:32:57.798
<v Mitch Green>Yeah, I just wanted to note that most of what we'll be doing when we do policy development is pre-referral to the full council.

968
01:32:58.242 --> 01:33:08.153
<v Mitch Green>And so when we engage with the bureaus, it is important to engage with them early as we develop our policies, and then that gets referred to our committee, and then we pass it out of committee.

969
01:33:09.467 --> 01:33:18.818
<v Mitch Green>And so I don't think we're shortcutting the engagement with staff by moving the referral from committee to full council to 45 days.

970
01:33:18.994 --> 01:33:22.810
<v Mitch Green>And I think it gives us an opportunity to clear some bottlenecks that we have in the city right now.

971
01:33:23.920 --> 01:33:32.328
<v Mitch Green>As many of my colleagues have said, we want to be the city of yes, and it's hard to imagine being the city of yes if we have a really long lead time in passing policy.

972
01:33:32.376 --> 01:33:34.023
<v Mitch Green>And so that's why I support the 45 days.

973
01:33:36.350 --> 01:33:36.931
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

974
01:33:37.094 --> 01:33:37.887
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal.

975
01:33:39.280 --> 01:33:41.078
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Madam President.

976
01:33:43.545 --> 01:34:05.467
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm confused by the conversation around whether or not we would need to ask I am confused because once something has been filed, the filer, whether it's a part of the administration or it's a city councilor, obviously wants it to be discussed.

977
01:34:05.851 --> 01:34:15.137
<v Sameer Kanal>And so having this backstop of it can't be longer than however many days it is, is a protection for that individual and for the content to ensure that it happens.

978
01:34:15.234 --> 01:34:15.859
<v Sameer Kanal>Councilor Dan Ryan.

979
01:34:16.757 --> 01:34:25.413
<v Sameer Kanal>But I think what we're hearing here is really the tools of status quo bias, because the tools of status quo bias are using process to impede progress.

980
01:34:25.525 --> 01:34:29.507
<v Sameer Kanal>Did you run this by someone that's not material to the conversation?

981
01:34:29.942 --> 01:34:30.777
<v Sameer Kanal>Is one of those things.

982
01:34:30.824 --> 01:34:39.270
<v Sameer Kanal>And I'm just baffled by the idea that if the administration or a councilor is putting it forward, they wouldn't want it to be on the agenda faster.

983
01:34:39.898 --> 01:34:43.157
<v Sameer Kanal>So that's not about the number of days specifically.

984
01:34:43.206 --> 01:34:43.606
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think that's a fair point.

985
01:34:44.314 --> 01:34:45.966
<v Sameer Kanal>But it is about the conversation.

986
01:34:46.015 --> 01:34:47.989
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm just very, very confused by that.

987
01:34:49.371 --> 01:34:50.847
<v Sameer Kanal>And its applicability here.

988
01:34:51.844 --> 01:35:00.690
<v Sameer Kanal>As it relates to Councilor Koyama Lane's amendment, I appreciate this conversation because we are talking about this in the context of how many hours of council we have.

989
01:35:01.573 --> 01:35:05.828
<v Sameer Kanal>We can't act at the pace that the people want us to act right now.

990
01:35:05.972 --> 01:35:07.707
<v Sameer Kanal>And that's not primarily because of this.

991
01:35:08.237 --> 01:35:08.927
<v Sameer Kanal>It may relate to the number of days.

992
01:35:08.992 --> 01:35:09.393
<v Sameer Kanal>Councilor Koyama Lane.

993
01:35:09.845 --> 01:35:21.908
<v Sameer Kanal>I think it does to some degree, as we saw with Councilor Dunphy's proposal on changing the noise code, and that was the only reason that that ended up getting on the special meeting agenda that week.

994
01:35:22.472 --> 01:35:31.027
<v Sameer Kanal>But primarily it's because we move slower than the mayor and we are unable to be as responsive to the needs of the people as we'd like to be.

995
01:35:32.462 --> 01:35:33.416
<v Sameer Kanal>Part of that's by design.

996
01:35:34.400 --> 01:35:40.032
<v Sameer Kanal>The mayor is designed to act faster, but part of it is because of the underlying needs for this entire ordinance.

997
01:35:40.096 --> 01:35:43.788
<v Sameer Kanal>And I think because the day count relates to that, this is relevant to that conversation.

998
01:35:44.630 --> 01:35:47.217
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm not 100% certain where I'm at on it.

999
01:35:47.265 --> 01:35:58.818
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm likely to vote yes at this moment, but I do think it's worth saying we should be looking at a council agenda that reflects the needs of the people as council sees it.

1000
01:35:59.368 --> 01:36:18.712
<v Sameer Kanal>And I feel like we've had a lot of time go towards the mayor's proposals and the administration's proposals, which are important and have had the other part of our government, meaning councilors, have to wait to have whenever the gaps, whatever the scraps are left at the table on the agenda from the mayor's side.

1001
01:36:19.148 --> 01:36:19.487
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks.

1002
01:36:21.404 --> 01:36:22.296
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1003
01:36:23.025 --> 01:36:23.885
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Zimmerman.

1004
01:36:25.701 --> 01:36:28.376
<v Eric Zimmerman>That was quicker than I expected.

1005
01:36:28.603 --> 01:36:28.699
<v Eric Zimmerman>Okay.

1006
01:36:32.551 --> 01:36:51.818
<v Eric Zimmerman>I guess I have said multiple times when we've written code, when we've written council rules, that I'm not a big fan of putting a lot of specifics in what a presiding officer or what a chair or vice chair does because I value the decision-making of that person, and it's part of how I judge them in their role.

1007
01:36:52.797 --> 01:37:14.707
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so, And I know there's differences of opinions about how much authority or what the role of council president is that exists on this dais, but I am counting on the presiding officer of this council to have an idea for the breadth and extent of all things coming to this council and making the best decision for what comes next.

1008
01:37:14.931 --> 01:37:24.360
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so by adding this 45— so to be clear, I was against In December and January, I was against the 90 days, and that was a compromise.

1009
01:37:24.617 --> 01:37:42.230
<v Eric Zimmerman>And now this 45 days is just that much more of how much I would be against it, because 45 days in our work, given the nature of, of everything that comes, I think, um, eliminates my ability to say the presiding officer has decision-making abilities on this.

1010
01:37:42.663 --> 01:37:50.461
<v Eric Zimmerman>And it means any person could do the role because you just say, oh, we're coming up on 45 days, this thing has to go forward.

1011
01:37:50.541 --> 01:38:03.395
<v Eric Zimmerman>Councilor So I think there are times when a perfectly well-meaning piece of legislation is going to bump up against that 45 days, but given what we're in the midst of, it may be a bad time for council to take it up.

1012
01:38:03.541 --> 01:38:06.349
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I use this topic specifically that we're on today.

1013
01:38:07.055 --> 01:38:31.095
<v Eric Zimmerman>If this had hit its 45-day mark on May 23rd, I think it would have been chaos for us in the midst of a much bigger mission, which was and so I think 90 days gives, gives a great deal of flexibility and still gives us as councilors a serious backstop that is not too far in one direction.

1014
01:38:31.448 --> 01:38:43.359
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so I want to just caution everybody in that I think the presiding officer has a role, and that role is a little bit of a bigger picture, an awareness of a bigger picture than maybe we all do from our 5 different perspectives.

1015
01:38:43.422 --> 01:38:53.345
<v Eric Zimmerman>Councilor and so for that reason, I think 45 days is well-meaning, but actually in implementation could cause us pretty significant problems down the line.

1016
01:38:53.409 --> 01:39:10.208
<v Eric Zimmerman>So I hope that we don't support this amendment, and I hope that we lean on the presiding officer to give us a reason or to help us politic something if we need it to come more quickly instead of continually using the rules, because I think we are inherently in politics.

1017
01:39:10.256 --> 01:39:10.368
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

1018
01:39:10.806 --> 01:39:17.438
<v Eric Zimmerman>And we are in the business of convincing other humans to get a thing we care about passed, or at least heard.

1019
01:39:18.750 --> 01:39:20.641
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And you want to listen to—.

1020
01:39:22.648 --> 01:39:26.854
<v Eric Zimmerman>We will only use, uh, the rules if we're not good at the politics.

1021
01:39:27.527 --> 01:39:29.092
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so I just, I just offer that up.

1022
01:39:32.533 --> 01:39:33.552
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1023
01:39:34.378 --> 01:39:41.326
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Um, colleagues, we have DCA Morrissey stepping in, who's our acting city administrator this week.

1024
01:39:41.470 --> 01:39:48.131
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And, um, DCA Morrissey, you have DCA Oliveira in the room as well if you want to phone a friend.

1025
01:39:48.211 --> 01:40:06.408
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>The question for you both that was posed by Councilor Ryan, um, what we're discussing right now is whether the current requirement that a presiding officer schedule something at council that has come out of committee, which is a 90-day requirement, something has to be schedule that council within 90 days should be shortened to 45 days.

1026
01:40:07.082 --> 01:40:42.351
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And whether— I'm paraphrasing Councilor Ryan, so if I paraphrase incorrectly, please step in— whether something that is coming from a councilor, so not something that the administration has brought forward, but something coming from a councilor coming out of committee and then being heard and presumably passed out of council within 45 days, is a a requirement that would work for the administrative side, or whether there are times where you all would want us to take more time in order for you to have more time to prep for that presumably being passed and coming to you for implementation.

1027
01:40:43.573 --> 01:40:44.215
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thanks, Councilor.

1028
01:40:44.697 --> 01:40:46.207
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Was that an appropriate summary?

1029
01:40:46.287 --> 01:40:46.817
<v Dan Ryan>Yeah, better than I thought.

1030
01:40:46.881 --> 01:40:47.122
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

1031
01:40:47.587 --> 01:40:50.543
<v Unidentified speaker>So for the record, this is on.

1032
01:40:51.219 --> 01:40:51.989
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I don't believe it's on.

1033
01:40:52.118 --> 01:40:52.663
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is it green now?

1034
01:40:52.969 --> 01:40:53.338
<v Unidentified speaker>It's on now.

1035
01:40:54.206 --> 01:40:59.131
<v Unidentified speaker>So for the record, DCA Sarah Morrissey, she/her pronouns.

1036
01:41:00.109 --> 01:41:07.833
<v Unidentified speaker>My response would be that it depends on the context, and it is highly dependent on how the staff have been engaged.

1037
01:41:07.962 --> 01:41:23.809
<v Unidentified speaker>If the council office needs to develop policy, if it is impacting a budgetary element that needs analysis, it's just highly contextual, dependent on the volume of work and complexity.

1038
01:41:24.483 --> 01:41:25.797
<v Unidentified speaker>That the item has.

1039
01:41:25.845 --> 01:41:35.452
<v Unidentified speaker>So whether it's, I'd say, right, if a council member is bringing forward a resolution, I feel like that would be fine in the 45 days or less.

1040
01:41:35.853 --> 01:41:47.143
<v Unidentified speaker>I think if it's an ordinance, any type of land use, any type of major budgetary impact, that would take a more coordinated, significant time.

1041
01:41:47.319 --> 01:41:49.740
<v Unidentified speaker>And so I think it just depends on the scope.

1042
01:41:49.853 --> 01:41:50.029
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

1043
01:41:50.141 --> 01:41:54.207
<v Unidentified speaker>Scale of the impact of whatever council is working on.

1044
01:41:54.319 --> 01:42:04.363
<v Unidentified speaker>And then also I would say, how much have the teams on the administrative side been involved, whether it's providing analysis or developing code?

1045
01:42:04.865 --> 01:42:09.262
<v Unidentified speaker>Again, just depends on what the ordinance would be.

1046
01:42:10.984 --> 01:42:11.377
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

1047
01:42:19.509 --> 01:42:20.359
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you, Madam President.

1048
01:42:20.408 --> 01:42:25.225
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you, um, um, Assistant DCA Sarah.

1049
01:42:25.851 --> 01:42:41.460
<v Loretta Smith>I was just getting ready to say that, that we have 2 things at our disposal as a commission, and the reason why we would need to talk to the administration and the mayor's office is to ask them, um, whether this is a resolution, an ordinance, if they could get things out quicker.

1050
01:42:41.524 --> 01:42:48.323
<v Loretta Smith>Because what I find is the issue is that there are all these emergency ordinances that we should have had earlier.

1051
01:42:48.418 --> 01:42:53.354
<v Loretta Smith>And if we had that time earlier, that 90 days would have been really nice to have.

1052
01:42:54.203 --> 01:42:58.994
<v Loretta Smith>Secondly, we always have at our disposal the 9/12ths.

1053
01:42:59.460 --> 01:43:06.863
<v Loretta Smith>If there's an emergency, if there's something that needs to go on the big council, then we have that ability to put those items forward.

1054
01:43:06.927 --> 01:43:08.786
<v Loretta Smith>And I think we should use that.

1055
01:43:09.042 --> 01:43:09.346
<v Candace Avalos>Councilor Smith.

1056
01:43:11.011 --> 01:43:14.876
<v Loretta Smith>We should use that lever sparingly, but we do have it at our disposal.

1057
01:43:15.069 --> 01:43:24.252
<v Loretta Smith>That would help with this, this, uh, 45-day thing that, that folks may think that we need right now in, in code.

1058
01:43:24.350 --> 01:43:25.627
<v Loretta Smith>I, I just don't think that we need it.

1059
01:43:26.279 --> 01:43:26.719
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

1060
01:43:29.078 --> 01:43:29.859
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1061
01:43:31.840 --> 01:43:41.148
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, I want to speak to this just from the experiences that I've had as the presiding officer over the last 7 months, and we have had some things that have come right up to the deadline.

1062
01:43:41.980 --> 01:43:51.756
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>The reason that we have had that has been the combination of less frequent meetings and, for the most part, the budget period.

1063
01:43:52.621 --> 01:43:53.181
<v Angelita Morillo>Mm-hmm.

1064
01:43:53.261 --> 01:43:58.453
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>When things were coming right up to the deadline was during and immediately after our budget process.

1065
01:43:59.511 --> 01:44:05.909
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And my intent is never to drag things out to the very end unnecessarily.

1066
01:44:06.743 --> 01:44:26.492
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I am looking forward to, if the underlying passes in some form, having the flexibility of more regular meetings so that we can be more thoughtful as a body about what is at a night meeting versus a day meeting, what is paired together and not paired together.

1067
01:44:26.555 --> 01:44:28.047
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We had an unfortunate pairing of—.

1068
01:44:28.064 --> 01:44:28.609
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilwoman Loretta Smith.

1069
01:44:28.689 --> 01:44:34.895
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I've had to move a lot of agenda items recently that I would've liked to avoid, but because of deadlines, wasn't able to.

1070
01:44:35.761 --> 01:44:38.792
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And my hope is that things don't come up against the deadline.

1071
01:44:39.225 --> 01:45:14.386
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I worry that if we shorten that deadline, which I understand having that backstop in case you have a presiding officer holding something, I worry that by shortening the deadline too much, we end up when we're in the middle of the budget process, or if we have a really meaty item takes up time in a number of council meetings to get through the full debate, that we could end up in a situation again where our presiding officer in the future has to arbitrarily move things around in a way that isn't what the body was hoping for because of the deadline.

1072
01:45:14.724 --> 01:45:19.453
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So I just want to share that perspective.

1073
01:45:21.104 --> 01:45:40.654
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think I and future presiding officers can work with whatever this body wants to choose, but not having that flexibility while a backstop that I think provides folks a guarantee that presiding officers won't play games with their measures does limit our ability to be thoughtful about how we bring things forward.

1074
01:45:47.304 --> 01:45:51.762
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Madam President, and thank you, DCA.

1075
01:45:51.880 --> 01:45:52.456
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Councilor Hersey.

1076
01:45:52.520 --> 01:45:53.561
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you, Councilor Hersey, for the clarity.

1077
01:45:53.818 --> 01:46:04.105
<v Olivia Clark>I'm, I'm quite concerned about, uh, the budget, the impact that we have on, uh, the staff and all the different bureaus, uh, particularly the ones I work with.

1078
01:46:04.234 --> 01:46:06.012
<v Olivia Clark>There's— we do so much work.

1079
01:46:06.877 --> 01:46:16.381
<v Olivia Clark>Um, and thank you, Council President, for reminding us about, um, the kind of backlog we had during the budget process.

1080
01:46:16.573 --> 01:46:25.854
<v Olivia Clark>I think it's a good reminder and there's nothing that says that we can't bring things forward more quickly now, especially that we're going to have more meetings.

1081
01:46:27.340 --> 01:46:40.596
<v Olivia Clark>And I guess I'm lucky that you waited a little while to call on me because I was feeling a little heated about some of the comments that were made regarding how the people want us to act and the needs of the people.

1082
01:46:41.337 --> 01:46:58.059
<v Olivia Clark>I think the people want us to provide some leadership on economic revitalization in this city, that they're waiting for us to deal with those larger issues and affordability and homelessness and those kinds of things.

1083
01:46:58.380 --> 01:47:04.467
<v Olivia Clark>I think we're way behind in offering leadership on economic revitalization.

1084
01:47:04.564 --> 01:47:08.130
<v Olivia Clark>I just want to put that out there, that I think that's what the people are waiting for us to do.

1085
01:47:08.837 --> 01:47:09.735
<v Olivia Clark>But that's just a side comment.

1086
01:47:09.800 --> 01:47:10.024
<v Olivia Clark>Thank you.

1087
01:47:10.365 --> 01:47:10.755
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

1088
01:47:12.395 --> 01:47:13.418
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1089
01:47:13.858 --> 01:47:15.123
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Koyama Lane.

1090
01:47:18.970 --> 01:47:20.631
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I really appreciate this great conversation.

1091
01:47:20.856 --> 01:47:25.418
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I think a lot of really good questions and concerns, comments have come up.

1092
01:47:26.984 --> 01:47:36.208
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Just want to remind everyone that currently it can take 3 months for something to come to committee and then another 3 months for it to come to full council.

1093
01:47:36.842 --> 01:47:37.940
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>So that is 6 months.

1094
01:47:39.682 --> 01:47:41.948
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I think we need to ask if that feels right.

1095
01:47:43.345 --> 01:47:53.128
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I've seen some of those concerns pop up with different items from many of us up here, wanting our agenda to come to full council.

1096
01:47:53.515 --> 01:48:02.554
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I saw that, I saw conversations around SIP where folks are really wanting that to get on the full council, around the noise code, around a few other things.

1097
01:48:02.688 --> 01:48:03.171
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I think that's a good point.

1098
01:48:03.399 --> 01:48:10.969
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I really found my colleague Councilor Zimmerman's point interesting around the timing piece, especially with budget.

1099
01:48:11.162 --> 01:48:15.195
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>That does make sense to me that we do want to be able to maintain flexibility.

1100
01:48:16.895 --> 01:48:33.372
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I have seen some ways that Council President already has been able to be flexible and frankly reasonable if you have a conversation with her about an item that is in the queue, being able to talk about that.

1101
01:48:34.128 --> 01:48:38.859
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And also, when it's getting close to the 90 days, there are some workarounds.

1102
01:48:39.289 --> 01:48:50.462
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I've seen items that are close to the 90 days and we can put it on the agenda and take it off, or we have a conversation if the members who are introducing it are open for that coming later.

1103
01:48:52.845 --> 01:49:07.627
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I hope, and I invite everyone to really zoom out and think about this as I'm trying to be as politically neutral as possible and think about how long do you think it makes sense for legislation that you might want to bring to come to make it through.

1104
01:49:08.653 --> 01:49:15.287
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I also am reviewing code and seeing that, I mean, when something is coming to the full council, it has already passed out of committee.

1105
01:49:16.056 --> 01:49:23.027
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>So there's been debate, it's passed, it's met the administrative requirements in coordination with the auditor.

1106
01:49:23.122 --> 01:49:23.314
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

1107
01:49:24.771 --> 01:49:28.069
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And so for me, part of this really is math.

1108
01:49:28.813 --> 01:49:43.137
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>If we are going to be meeting twice as frequently, there should be an expectation that Portlanders expect that we are getting through business faster, which is something I'm hearing from staff also, that we need to be getting through stuff faster.

1109
01:49:47.490 --> 01:49:48.376
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1110
01:49:50.407 --> 01:49:52.842
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Novick, I don't believe you've spoken yet to this issue.

1111
01:49:53.067 --> 01:49:54.524
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Actually, I'm pausing.

1112
01:49:54.573 --> 01:49:56.688
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm sorry, I don't believe Councilor Dunphy has either.

1113
01:49:56.832 --> 01:49:58.082
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dunphy, go right ahead.

1114
01:49:58.738 --> 01:49:59.076
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you.

1115
01:49:59.140 --> 01:50:01.655
<v Jamie Dunphy>Yeah, I am going to be supportive of this amendment.

1116
01:50:01.720 --> 01:50:07.761
<v Jamie Dunphy>I, you know, Council President, I think you have done as great of a job with the situation as we could.

1117
01:50:08.434 --> 01:50:12.680
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think that you're exactly right that meeting frequency and the budget has screwed everything up.

1118
01:50:13.400 --> 01:50:16.444
<v Jamie Dunphy>I am also the author of 2 ordinances that this body has passed.

1119
01:50:16.717 --> 01:50:22.797
<v Jamie Dunphy>That both approached the 90-day mark, and we had very limited tools to be able to adjust with that.

1120
01:50:23.423 --> 01:50:37.125
<v Jamie Dunphy>I'm also noting that the written testimony, though it is anonymous, one-third of the testimony in the— on this item is specifically that this council has not acted with the urgency that the moment calls upon.

1121
01:50:37.172 --> 01:50:48.006
<v Jamie Dunphy>So anything that I think we can do to increase the, the turnover time for these things is going to be leading towards the values that we are going to.

1122
01:50:48.391 --> 01:50:53.643
<v Jamie Dunphy>I firmly believe that this council president and future ones— well, I don't know about future ones.

1123
01:50:53.755 --> 01:51:00.483
<v Jamie Dunphy>I know this council president is working with the best intentions towards getting things scheduled and that we are doubling the number of council meetings.

1124
01:51:00.530 --> 01:51:06.006
<v Jamie Dunphy>So I think building in some additional urgency in our time is reasonable.

1125
01:51:06.150 --> 01:51:07.885
<v Jamie Dunphy>So I will be supportive of this amendment.

1126
01:51:07.932 --> 01:51:08.045
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you.

1127
01:51:09.770 --> 01:51:10.420
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1128
01:51:10.501 --> 01:51:12.188
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Novick, had you wanted an opportunity?

1129
01:51:13.341 --> 01:51:17.648
<v Steve Novick>Uh, I just wanted to, um, see the actual text of the amendment in context again.

1130
01:51:17.824 --> 01:51:20.492
<v Steve Novick>I think Councilor Karamalelis said she'd send it to me.

1131
01:51:20.636 --> 01:51:22.306
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Yes, I sent it to him on Teams.

1132
01:51:22.420 --> 01:51:22.966
<v Candace Avalos>I don't see it.

1133
01:51:23.144 --> 01:51:23.481
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

1134
01:51:23.965 --> 01:51:25.091
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'll let you two figure that out.

1135
01:51:25.155 --> 01:51:26.009
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Avalos?

1136
01:51:28.923 --> 01:51:32.095
<v Candace Avalos>I agree, um, with the framing that Councilor Dunphy just shared.

1137
01:51:32.224 --> 01:51:37.886
<v Candace Avalos>I think that if we're making all of these changes to increase the amount of time that we have to do our business.

1138
01:51:38.608 --> 01:51:43.596
<v Candace Avalos>It only makes sense to decrease the amount of time it takes for our business to get on the agenda.

1139
01:51:44.462 --> 01:51:59.847
<v Candace Avalos>I obviously understand the challenges of agenda setting, and yet the urgency that everyone seems to want, I think, can only really happen if we are pushing ourselves through our systems to ensure that we're moving our items more quickly.

1140
01:52:00.360 --> 01:52:12.735
<v Candace Avalos>I get that there's a level of discretion that any council president needs, and yet but, you know, again, the combination of adding more time and the fact that we need to be moving more quickly, I think it's important that we make this change right now.

1141
01:52:13.186 --> 01:52:14.908
<v Candace Avalos>And we're setting up our future, right?

1142
01:52:15.505 --> 01:52:21.368
<v Candace Avalos>Because all of these things that we're describing that we've experienced in the first few months are, I think, in a lot of ways an anomaly.

1143
01:52:21.805 --> 01:52:28.984
<v Candace Avalos>They are a product of a growing new— growing our new government.

1144
01:52:29.470 --> 01:53:02.466
<v Candace Avalos>And so I'm looking at this I think that we need to take into consideration that we're making a lot of adjustments right now to ensure that we are working with both urgency but also working in collaboration through our committees to vet these policies, so I don't see why we can't shorten that timeline from committee to council.

1145
01:53:02.547 --> 01:53:10.865
<v Candace Avalos>I think all of the extra layers of working with the bureaus and all those other variables that were being discussed, I think those variables get worked out in committee.

1146
01:53:11.283 --> 01:53:16.470
<v Candace Avalos>We specifically have a structure in committee that things can stay in committee as long as they need to to get the work done.

1147
01:53:16.823 --> 01:53:19.618
<v Candace Avalos>By the time it's done by committee, it needs to get on the council agenda.

1148
01:53:19.954 --> 01:53:21.512
<v Candace Avalos>Waiting 90 days is way too long.

1149
01:53:22.027 --> 01:53:29.408
<v Candace Avalos>I think with the addition of more time of council, We should approve this amendment to ensure that things coming out of committee are moving through our body more quickly.

1150
01:53:29.505 --> 01:53:30.435
<v Candace Avalos>So I will be supporting it.

1151
01:53:30.773 --> 01:53:31.992
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1152
01:53:32.072 --> 01:53:33.404
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Smith, I apologize.

1153
01:53:33.756 --> 01:53:34.479
<v Loretta Smith>That's, that's okay.

1154
01:53:34.559 --> 01:53:40.447
<v Loretta Smith>So we're changing our structure and we're having twice the amount of meetings, right?

1155
01:53:41.121 --> 01:53:45.693
<v Loretta Smith>So this particular amendment is solving for a problem we don't have yet.

1156
01:53:46.270 --> 01:53:51.331
<v Loretta Smith>Let's let this work through the next 3 months to see what these new excuse me.

1157
01:53:53.579 --> 01:53:53.805
<v Olivia Clark>Sorry.

1158
01:53:54.226 --> 01:54:03.277
<v Loretta Smith>Um, what these new, um, meetings will give us, I guarantee you that we'll see things come up on the, on the, on the big council quicker.

1159
01:54:03.838 --> 01:54:06.747
<v Loretta Smith>So I don't like to solve for problems that we don't have right now.

1160
01:54:06.811 --> 01:54:10.837
<v Loretta Smith>We've changed our structure, so let's give this structure an opportunity to work.

1161
01:54:11.225 --> 01:54:17.444
<v Loretta Smith>If after 3 months it's still a long time before we get to the big, uh, council, then this, this is an appropriate amendment.

1162
01:54:18.233 --> 01:54:22.170
<v Loretta Smith>And I want to say for the record, I'm a chair of the Labor and Workforce Committee.

1163
01:54:22.748 --> 01:54:27.462
<v Loretta Smith>It has never taken 3 months for anyone to get on, on my calendar.

1164
01:54:27.868 --> 01:54:28.256
<v Loretta Smith>Never.

1165
01:54:29.573 --> 01:54:32.269
<v Loretta Smith>So let's, let's just give it a chance, you guys.

1166
01:54:32.902 --> 01:54:34.916
<v Loretta Smith>Let's stop solving for problems and nuance.

1167
01:54:36.398 --> 01:54:37.347
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1168
01:54:40.060 --> 01:54:41.835
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Uh, Acting Administrator, is that what we're using?

1169
01:54:42.028 --> 01:54:45.110
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Morrissey, uh, did you have anything else to add?

1170
01:54:45.158 --> 01:54:48.229
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It sounded like there might have been some other yeah.

1171
01:54:49.720 --> 01:54:50.443
<v Unidentified speaker>Hi, thank you.

1172
01:54:51.356 --> 01:55:16.966
<v Unidentified speaker>So I also wanted to share that for specifically, I would like to flag just from a staff capacity standpoint, it is already pretty challenging to make sure that we have the ability to really have the— we need the time to have the accuracy so we can give you correct information and ensure that we can implement with accuracy and be effective in the ordinances or the rules that you are all making.

1173
01:55:17.414 --> 01:55:30.996
<v Unidentified speaker>I will also share that Title 33, so that is a really hard one to have a 45-day time turnaround, especially that's around planning and zoning.

1174
01:55:31.332 --> 01:55:39.045
<v Unidentified speaker>If there are anything that have to require updated findings, we do need more than 45 days to do that work.

1175
01:55:39.445 --> 01:55:46.788
<v Unidentified speaker>And so I would just urge for the for staff who are really working hard to ensure you have as much.

1176
01:55:46.983 --> 01:55:54.104
<v Unidentified speaker>Complete information and that things are done on time and with accuracy, that we take that into account.

1177
01:55:54.185 --> 01:56:00.171
<v Unidentified speaker>So I would just voice that to help support the staff's work.

1178
01:56:02.909 --> 01:56:13.362
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So just to clarify on those code changes, the reason that staff need additional time is about creating the record in case those are appealed.

1179
01:56:13.411 --> 01:56:14.720
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is that the type of change you're referring to?

1180
01:56:14.768 --> 01:56:14.930
<v Unidentified speaker>Correct.

1181
01:56:14.978 --> 01:56:16.448
<v Unidentified speaker>So creating updated findings.

1182
01:56:16.831 --> 01:56:21.382
<v Unidentified speaker>Is especially with Title 33, staff definitely need more than 45 days.

1183
01:56:23.050 --> 01:56:23.590
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you.

1184
01:56:26.069 --> 01:56:28.332
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor— I'm looking at my list, I'm sorry.

1185
01:56:28.430 --> 01:56:30.337
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Green, I don't believe you've spoken to this yet.

1186
01:56:30.402 --> 01:56:30.824
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Go right ahead.

1187
01:56:32.122 --> 01:56:32.895
<v Mitch Green>Thank you, Madam President.

1188
01:56:33.796 --> 01:56:39.720
<v Mitch Green>Acting DCA or CA— DCA Morris, you raised an interesting question for me.

1189
01:56:41.072 --> 01:56:55.148
<v Mitch Green>In your view, does staff need more than 45 days between the time that an action has passed out of committee to then be considered at full council, or do they need more than 45 days just in general to develop this policy?

1190
01:56:56.623 --> 01:56:57.282
<v Unidentified speaker>Thanks for the question.

1191
01:56:57.409 --> 01:57:01.163
<v Unidentified speaker>I think it depends on what the action between committee and council is.

1192
01:57:01.742 --> 01:57:08.864
<v Unidentified speaker>If you do have to do, like I said, updated findings related to land use and zoning, they do need more than 45 days.

1193
01:57:09.041 --> 01:57:16.630
<v Unidentified speaker>I think, again, it would just depend okay, that's very helpful.

1194
01:57:18.649 --> 01:57:19.332
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1195
01:57:19.657 --> 01:57:23.475
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor— Councilor Kanal, did you just leave the queue?

1196
01:57:25.087 --> 01:57:25.182
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Yeah.

1197
01:57:25.747 --> 01:57:26.069
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

1198
01:57:26.375 --> 01:57:29.256
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor, um, Ryan.

1199
01:57:30.238 --> 01:57:31.703
<v Dan Ryan>Thank you, Council President.

1200
01:57:32.105 --> 01:57:33.652
<v Dan Ryan>I want us to keep this in mind.

1201
01:57:33.877 --> 01:57:35.337
<v Dan Ryan>You know this better than anyone, Council President.

1202
01:57:35.387 --> 01:57:36.422
<v Dan Ryan>There are demands that are being made by the city attorney's office.

1203
01:57:36.520 --> 01:57:44.345
<v Dan Ryan>That come from the administration, from the executive, that are time-sensitive to keep the operations of the city moving forward.

1204
01:57:44.635 --> 01:57:47.054
<v Dan Ryan>So I know that you have to factor that into the calendar.

1205
01:57:47.440 --> 01:57:50.712
<v Dan Ryan>And so I just wanted to make sure that we lift that because those are urgent.

1206
01:57:51.292 --> 01:57:54.595
<v Dan Ryan>And, uh, DCA Morrissey, would that be a fair statement?

1207
01:57:56.859 --> 01:57:56.988
<v Rebecca Dobert>Yes.

1208
01:57:57.345 --> 01:57:57.717
<v Dan Ryan>Thank you.

1209
01:57:58.171 --> 01:58:08.841
<v Dan Ryan>And so I just don't— that's another reason why we need that flexibility on new items coming in thank you, Councilor.

1210
01:58:08.921 --> 01:58:09.688
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal.

1211
01:58:10.551 --> 01:58:12.019
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Madam President.

1212
01:58:14.439 --> 01:58:25.466
<v Sameer Kanal>I think that it's— this is a point that's been raised a couple times, um, and when we talk about staff, what we're really talking about here is bureau directors and above, DCAs, uh, city administrator, all of that.

1213
01:58:25.949 --> 01:58:28.719
<v Sameer Kanal>Most of the time, the people doing the filing are not city employees.

1214
01:58:29.350 --> 01:58:35.064
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, below that level, uh, there may be a deputy director, I suppose, as well, um, or that has to have approval.

1215
01:58:35.113 --> 01:58:39.863
<v Sameer Kanal>So we're, we're talking about who, who's dealing with the, the filing timelines and waiting here.

1216
01:58:40.636 --> 01:58:53.957
<v Sameer Kanal>Obviously there's a lot of other staff that work on it too, but I want to, I want to just be clear that we're not talking about, um, rank-and-file staff doing the filing without it already going through a large process, um, to get to that point.

1217
01:58:56.608 --> 01:59:01.310
<v Sameer Kanal>I think what's interesting here is the assumption that what council puts forward is not urgent.

1218
01:59:01.969 --> 01:59:09.431
<v Sameer Kanal>That's what I'm struggling with, is this implication that only what the administration puts forward is urgent.

1219
01:59:09.511 --> 01:59:11.935
<v Sameer Kanal>I do not question its urgency or its importance.

1220
01:59:12.400 --> 01:59:23.395
<v Sameer Kanal>What I question is the implication that what council puts forward, generally informed by the people that we talk to in those town halls and evening meetings and in our emails, is not urgent.

1221
01:59:23.443 --> 01:59:25.724
<v Sameer Kanal>Councilor are not urgent too.

1222
01:59:26.140 --> 01:59:32.163
<v Sameer Kanal>And I'm concerned that, you know, we're going to be in a situation— we're talking about let's wait 3 or 4 months.

1223
01:59:32.404 --> 01:59:38.621
<v Sameer Kanal>We're going to be in a situation in the next 3 or 4 months where we're going to have hopefully some sort of legislation about ICE.

1224
01:59:39.310 --> 01:59:41.399
<v Sameer Kanal>I do not want to be voting on that in 2026.

1225
01:59:42.443 --> 01:59:44.257
<v Sameer Kanal>I would like to be voting on that in 2025.

1226
01:59:44.917 --> 01:59:52.176
<v Sameer Kanal>And there's going to be a need for us to address those things and everything that Councilor Clark mentioned.

1227
01:59:52.225 --> 01:59:52.337
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you.

1228
01:59:52.449 --> 01:59:58.108
<v Sameer Kanal>Which I agree with completely on economic development and homelessness and all those issues too.

1229
01:59:58.636 --> 02:00:01.489
<v Sameer Kanal>And those might be filed by us.

1230
02:00:01.778 --> 02:00:05.064
<v Sameer Kanal>They might also be filed by the administration, and both are urgent.

1231
02:00:05.448 --> 02:00:10.514
<v Sameer Kanal>And this implication that what we file is not urgent, that really is troubling me with this whole conversation.

1232
02:00:11.011 --> 02:00:19.762
<v Sameer Kanal>It's less relevant to the number of days, and I really appreciate Council President's comments because your experience, Madam President, is relevant to this.

1233
02:00:19.810 --> 02:00:19.922
<v Angelita Morillo>Thank you.

1234
02:00:20.372 --> 02:00:30.176
<v Sameer Kanal>In a very direct way, and I'd love to know, because you mentioned that you wouldn't want to limit it too far, if you have another set of days, another number of days that might make you personally more comfortable with it.

1235
02:00:31.533 --> 02:00:31.823
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks.

1236
02:00:33.164 --> 02:00:34.684
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1237
02:00:35.250 --> 02:00:38.125
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I actually am in the queue specifically to reply to that.

1238
02:00:38.333 --> 02:00:50.769
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Yes, I just, I want to clarify because what my colleague just said was that the deadlines that are our acting city administrator was talking about would only affect directors and above.

1239
02:00:50.961 --> 02:01:18.864
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And my understanding from what I heard, and I want to make sure this is accurate, is that what you were describing, Acting Administrator Morrissey, is that on land use and code items where staff need to have a record before we pass something that our attorneys can then use if those code changes or land use items are appealed through the land use system that can stand, that can hold.

1240
02:01:19.443 --> 02:01:46.338
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>If there are committee changes that are significant that would require staff, frontline staff, who are the people who write those documents, to make changes to those documents, we would need enough time for those frontline staff and the attorneys to work together to change the documents before council debated to make sure that the record could hold if those were appealed in a land use process.

1241
02:01:46.779 --> 02:02:03.064
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So we're actually talking about the needs of frontline staff and our non-management attorney team to do work so that the findings accurately reflect what council has asked for in an appeal so that we can actually win in court.

1242
02:02:03.162 --> 02:02:05.872
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is that— we're talking about frontline staff, is that accurate?

1243
02:02:06.216 --> 02:02:06.761
<v Unidentified speaker>That is accurate.

1244
02:02:07.048 --> 02:02:08.604
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, thank you for clarifying.

1245
02:02:08.780 --> 02:02:12.323
<v Sameer Kanal>My comment was not in response to the DCA's comments.

1246
02:02:12.547 --> 02:02:19.377
<v Sameer Kanal>My comment was in response to earlier colleagues who were talking about who is the burden being placed on staff who are filing the item.

1247
02:02:20.082 --> 02:02:22.006
<v Sameer Kanal>I agree completely with everything you just said.

1248
02:02:22.262 --> 02:02:25.645
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, thank you, Councilor.

1249
02:02:26.911 --> 02:02:30.166
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Ryan, you've spoken twice, so I want to make sure we hear from others.

1250
02:02:30.759 --> 02:02:31.849
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Zimmerman.

1251
02:02:33.811 --> 02:02:34.135
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

1252
02:02:34.779 --> 02:02:49.180
<v Eric Zimmerman>Um, I, you know, in listening to this conversation, I'm not getting the sense from, from other councilors that, that anybody is conveying less urgent, more urgent.

1253
02:02:49.533 --> 02:02:51.581
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so I'm not, I'm not hearing that.

1254
02:02:52.048 --> 02:03:02.697
<v Eric Zimmerman>But if we have a 90-day backstop, which we currently have, We have a presiding officer who can always put something on the agenda day one.

1255
02:03:03.942 --> 02:03:11.033
<v Eric Zimmerman>That window to me is, is serving an important role right now, and I'm not, I'm not bothered by, by going to the end of that window.

1256
02:03:12.319 --> 02:03:40.184
<v Eric Zimmerman>But I would also say in terms of urgency and flexibility, as was noted earlier with the 9/12 option, if something is so urgent but the presiding officer is so against it, I guess I have to debate whether or not there is enough consensus around an item being urgent that one cannot get 9 people to say we must hear it now.

1257
02:03:40.695 --> 02:03:42.555
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I think that that is a healthy debate.

1258
02:03:43.020 --> 02:03:44.702
<v Eric Zimmerman>And a lot of this council is split.

1259
02:03:45.599 --> 02:03:53.738
<v Eric Zimmerman>And a lot of this council, we're going to have these debates that, um, that are, are important debates even when we disagree with each other.

1260
02:03:53.787 --> 02:03:54.154
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think that's a good point.

1261
02:03:55.215 --> 02:04:04.976
<v Eric Zimmerman>But for the things where we are united in that their urgency is there, and if we have a council president who is the one stick in the mud who doesn't want to move it, I think we still have the tools to do it.

1262
02:04:05.105 --> 02:04:08.878
<v Eric Zimmerman>So to Councilor Smith's point, I'm not sure of the problem we're solving here.

1263
02:04:09.970 --> 02:04:22.694
<v Eric Zimmerman>And for those things that don't have 9 people saying they're urgent, then healthy, timely debate is important and 90 days to me seems very reasonable for that.

1264
02:04:22.984 --> 02:04:34.432
<v Eric Zimmerman>And, and so, um, yeah, again, I think, you know, this, this amendment to the overarching baseline document would be pretty concerning.

1265
02:04:34.707 --> 02:04:35.016
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

1266
02:04:35.762 --> 02:04:36.409
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1267
02:04:36.489 --> 02:04:37.234
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Morillo.

1268
02:04:40.659 --> 02:04:42.882
<v Angelita Morillo>I just want to address a few things that I heard earlier.

1269
02:04:43.012 --> 02:05:00.194
<v Angelita Morillo>So for one thing, 90 days is not acceptable when people are suffering and we have to get legislation passed for another thing, there were some comments about this is politics, not rulemaking, and so therefore you have to build consensus.

1270
02:05:00.771 --> 02:05:13.141
<v Angelita Morillo>I would say that we are a pretty, pretty split council on many issues, and actually, Councilor Zimmerman, you and I are probably on the opposite ends of the spectrum, so the irony of that coming from you is not lost on me.

1271
02:05:13.766 --> 02:05:26.635
<v Angelita Morillo>But the value implication that we need to have in this is that we need to be able to Uh, a majority vote to pass things for the people when we are representing very different types of people is not a value that I necessarily think is needed.

1272
02:05:26.987 --> 02:05:42.306
<v Angelita Morillo>There are going to be times where I'm going to pass things with 7 votes, and that is fine with me because, uh, actually passing legislation that is going to help people who I am choosing to represent, who happen to be the people at the very bottom of the ladder, uh, that is my priority.

1273
02:05:42.354 --> 02:05:42.466
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you.

1274
02:05:44.539 --> 02:05:51.579
<v Angelita Morillo>So the 9/12 vote only has utility to a certain degree to rush something through.

1275
02:05:51.579 --> 02:05:56.300
<v Angelita Morillo>Sometimes you just need something to be on the agenda and you know that you're going to get 7 votes and you're going to call it a day.

1276
02:05:57.140 --> 02:06:03.500
<v Angelita Morillo>And we are absolutely required to move with urgency on some of these issues.

1277
02:06:04.060 --> 02:06:09.779
<v Angelita Morillo>I have heard every single person here at one point or another absolutely berate the council president or be extremely Councilor critical of the council president's handling of Sameer this.

1278
02:06:09.779 --> 02:06:09.962
<v Angelita Morillo>Councilor Smith, I'm Kanal.

1279
02:06:09.840 --> 02:06:09.859
<v Angelita Morillo>Sorry.

1280
02:06:10.074 --> 02:06:10.493
<v Angelita Morillo>Councilor Sameer Kanal.

1281
02:06:10.668 --> 02:06:14.828
<v Angelita Morillo>Councilor Sameer Kanal was extremely angry that they could not get their item on the agenda because we did not have enough time.

1282
02:06:15.405 --> 02:06:26.902
<v Angelita Morillo>And the idea that the administrative side of council gets to completely bog down our agenda so that we can't, as the legislative body, pass legislation is a huge problem.

1283
02:06:27.304 --> 02:06:45.796
<v Angelita Morillo>Everything that Councilor Kanal laid out means that we are essentially forfeiting our power as a legislative and and we are the people here who are representing every single district, every single type of person in Portland.

1284
02:06:45.844 --> 02:06:49.439
<v Angelita Morillo>We have a wide variety of perspectives on this council for that very reason.

1285
02:06:50.274 --> 02:06:54.832
<v Angelita Morillo>So the 45-day limit is not unheard of.

1286
02:06:55.136 --> 02:06:58.297
<v Angelita Morillo>This is, I think, very reasonable given that we're going to have more meetings.

1287
02:06:59.085 --> 02:07:00.818
<v Angelita Morillo>I understand the concerns about certain land use issues.

1288
02:07:00.881 --> 02:07:01.234
<v Angelita Morillo>Councilor Smith.

1289
02:07:01.572 --> 02:07:07.886
<v Angelita Morillo>Issues or different code changes that staff need delays, maybe that can be an amendment or something to the code.

1290
02:07:08.479 --> 02:07:12.194
<v Angelita Morillo>But overall, this is— we are required to act with urgency.

1291
02:07:12.948 --> 02:07:15.376
<v Angelita Morillo>So I hope that we can get on board with this.

1292
02:07:18.078 --> 02:07:18.738
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1293
02:07:18.818 --> 02:07:19.524
<v Steve Novick>Councilor Novick.

1294
02:07:20.520 --> 02:07:23.396
<v Steve Novick>So I have to say, I don't feel prepared to vote on this today.

1295
02:07:24.023 --> 02:07:40.055
<v Steve Novick>I mean, I was just looking at the existing language and I'm probably dense, but it's not clear to me that it assumes that something has to have a chance to come through committee before the 45 days starts.

1296
02:07:40.877 --> 02:07:42.020
<v Steve Novick>So I'd want that to be clear.

1297
02:07:42.164 --> 02:07:48.158
<v Steve Novick>I also think that it should be, if we adopt this, it should be at the option of the filer.

1298
02:07:48.934 --> 02:07:56.282
<v Steve Novick>Because if the filer, after consulting with the administration, realizes, yes, it's going to take 60 days to write up findings on a land use issue, Right.

1299
02:07:56.655 --> 02:08:01.015
<v Steve Novick>Then the filer should be able to say, okay, then I'm waiving the 45 days.

1300
02:08:02.699 --> 02:08:03.840
<v Steve Novick>And maybe that's enough.

1301
02:08:03.936 --> 02:08:07.856
<v Steve Novick>I mean, it seems to me that it's sort of a question of who do you trust?

1302
02:08:08.097 --> 02:08:16.104
<v Steve Novick>Do we trust the filers not to rush things when they shouldn't, when there's issues like, you know, a complicated land use issue?

1303
02:08:16.573 --> 02:08:20.788
<v Steve Novick>Or do we trust the council president to bring things forward in a timely manner?

1304
02:08:21.484 --> 02:08:26.168
<v Steve Novick>And I think you can argue it either way.

1305
02:08:26.347 --> 02:08:28.805
<v Steve Novick>So I just wanna say that as of right now, I'm kind of confused.

1306
02:08:32.909 --> 02:08:39.220
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor, was there a motion there for us to do anything different or just expressing your thoughts on where we are right now?

1307
02:08:39.349 --> 02:08:40.284
<v Steve Novick>Just where we are right now.

1308
02:08:40.577 --> 02:08:42.275
<v Steve Novick>I don't feel prepared to vote today.

1309
02:08:42.519 --> 02:08:42.761
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

1310
02:08:42.841 --> 02:08:44.073
<v Steve Novick>I'd wanna think about it more.

1311
02:08:44.945 --> 02:08:45.739
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1312
02:08:46.548 --> 02:08:53.829
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, seeing no one else in the queue, Yeah, I—.

1313
02:08:54.167 --> 02:08:56.947
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>This is likely not going to pass.

1314
02:08:57.043 --> 02:08:57.863
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I understand that.

1315
02:08:58.104 --> 02:09:07.104
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>DCA Morrissey, I appreciate you sharing the needs of DCAs and bureaus.

1316
02:09:07.768 --> 02:09:24.819
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Uh, I know we've had many conversations as leadership about ways that we can work on the flow, make sure it's I think it is known that we need to figure out how we're working in tandem a little bit better and how to collaborate.

1317
02:09:25.140 --> 02:09:27.533
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I hope that this can come up for another conversation.

1318
02:09:28.112 --> 02:09:29.909
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>It's clear that it's very controversial.

1319
02:09:30.118 --> 02:09:39.382
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I see staff members running around and talking to DCAs, and some of you might want to be careful because I sit right next to Council President and I can see exactly what you're sending to her.

1320
02:09:39.431 --> 02:09:47.912
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Council President, um, Councilor Knoll, are you in the queue for debate?

1321
02:09:48.074 --> 02:09:54.259
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, uh, seeing no one else in the queue for debate, Rebecca, could you please call the roll?

1322
02:10:00.220 --> 02:10:00.703
<v Rebecca Dobert>Coyomelín?

1323
02:10:01.219 --> 02:10:01.268
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Aye.

1324
02:10:02.090 --> 02:10:02.493
<v Rebecca Dobert>Murillo?

1325
02:10:03.541 --> 02:10:03.670
<v Angelita Morillo>Aye.

1326
02:10:04.668 --> 02:10:05.153
<v Loretta Smith>Novick?

1327
02:10:07.024 --> 02:10:07.818
<v Steve Novick>A worried no.

1328
02:10:08.336 --> 02:10:10.103
<v Steve Novick>I mean, I might be a yes tomorrow.

1329
02:10:10.280 --> 02:10:12.711
<v Nancy Thorington>I just don't feel prepared to be a yes today.

1330
02:10:12.824 --> 02:10:14.136
<v Eric Zimmerman>Don't let them shiver your timbers.

1331
02:10:15.829 --> 02:10:16.251
<v Rebecca Dobert>Clark?

1332
02:10:16.881 --> 02:10:17.028
<v Olivia Clark>No.

1333
02:10:18.338 --> 02:10:18.645
<v Rebecca Dobert>Green?

1334
02:10:19.552 --> 02:10:19.681
<v Mitch Green>Yes.

1335
02:10:20.539 --> 02:10:20.993
<v Rebecca Dobert>Zimmerman?

1336
02:10:21.268 --> 02:10:21.494
<v Jamie Dunphy>No.

1337
02:10:22.448 --> 02:10:22.689
<v Rebecca Dobert>Avalos?

1338
02:10:24.555 --> 02:10:24.587
<v Candace Avalos>Aye.

1339
02:10:25.681 --> 02:10:26.036
<v Rebecca Dobert>Dunphy?

1340
02:10:26.567 --> 02:10:26.615
<v Jamie Dunphy>Aye.

1341
02:10:27.548 --> 02:10:27.998
<v Rebecca Dobert>Smith?

1342
02:10:28.353 --> 02:10:28.658
<v Loretta Smith>No.

1343
02:10:29.560 --> 02:10:29.978
<v Rebecca Dobert>Kanal?

1344
02:10:30.992 --> 02:10:31.039
<v Olivia Clark>Aye.

1345
02:10:34.045 --> 02:10:34.141
<v Rebecca Dobert>No.

1346
02:10:34.577 --> 02:10:34.819
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>No.

1347
02:10:35.560 --> 02:10:37.979
<v Rebecca Dobert>The amendment fails with 6 aye and 6 nay votes.

1348
02:10:39.939 --> 02:11:07.734
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, colleagues, there were no other amendments that were put on the floor prior to debate, um, so we are now at debate of the underlying, now amended twice, And the queue is open for comments, debate, questions, or further amendments on the underlying ordinance.

1349
02:11:13.962 --> 02:11:14.737
<v Eric Zimmerman>Wait, the meeting's good.

1350
02:11:14.996 --> 02:11:17.158
<v Eric Zimmerman>Let's vote.

1351
02:11:17.900 --> 02:11:23.198
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I, I'm, I'm going to mention one thing first just because I want to make sure we're all aware.

1352
02:11:23.717 --> 02:11:32.646
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>In A3, there's language that says when a meeting falls on a legal holiday, the meeting will be held on the next succeeding business day at the same hour.

1353
02:11:33.515 --> 02:11:39.953
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I just wanna note that depending on how we set up our calendar, there could be some complications there.

1354
02:11:40.403 --> 02:11:48.976
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I don't think that it's enough to vote against this, but I wanted to note that that is something that we may have to come back to at a future time.

1355
02:11:49.329 --> 02:11:50.582
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>We have done field amendments.

1356
02:11:54.380 --> 02:11:56.833
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, seeing no one else in the queue.

1357
02:11:57.046 --> 02:11:59.073
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Rebecca, could you please— oh, Councilor Avalos.

1358
02:12:00.685 --> 02:12:02.341
<v Candace Avalos>Sorry, um, for the last minute.

1359
02:12:03.529 --> 02:12:05.442
<v Candace Avalos>I guess I just want to make a broader point.

1360
02:12:06.326 --> 02:12:13.119
<v Candace Avalos>I think what has emerged in this discussion is something we've been talking about since the beginning, which is what is the purpose of the council?

1361
02:12:13.394 --> 02:12:16.832
<v Candace Avalos>How does the people— how do the people interact with us?

1362
02:12:17.752 --> 02:12:19.488
<v Candace Avalos>What is the way that our policies move through?

1363
02:12:19.783 --> 02:12:26.956
<v Candace Avalos>And ultimately how are we demonstrating that we are being responsive with urgency to the communities that put us here?

1364
02:12:28.752 --> 02:12:39.409
<v Candace Avalos>I am just overall concerned that we do not share a similar value, it seems, in increasing the people's voice in our chambers.

1365
02:12:39.753 --> 02:12:42.043
<v Candace Avalos>And I just want to put on the record my disappointment.

1366
02:12:43.275 --> 02:12:47.921
<v Candace Avalos>I think that we continue to look at systems as being neutral when they're not.

1367
02:12:47.985 --> 02:12:48.375
<v Candace Avalos>Councilwoman Loretta Smith.

1368
02:12:49.694 --> 02:12:58.177
<v Candace Avalos>In fact, we redid this entire form of government because the way of being was very exclusive to the very communities that we now have represented on this council.

1369
02:12:58.529 --> 02:13:16.515
<v Candace Avalos>So I would encourage us to look holistically at our systems and remember that we instituted this new form of government to increase the people's representation, and making decisions to not add more nighttime, to not increase the urgency in our timelines, go— is antithetical to that overall outcome.

1370
02:13:17.273 --> 02:13:20.963
<v Candace Avalos>So I hope we continue to reflect on how we meet that goal.

1371
02:13:21.657 --> 02:13:23.252
<v Candace Avalos>I will continue to push us to do so.

1372
02:13:23.818 --> 02:13:24.173
<v Candace Avalos>Thanks.

1373
02:13:26.323 --> 02:13:27.180
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1374
02:13:29.136 --> 02:13:38.618
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I moved to call roll momentarily thinking that we were on an emergency item, but we're not.

1375
02:13:38.666 --> 02:13:40.394
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So we will hear this at our next meeting.

1376
02:13:40.902 --> 02:13:42.347
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Knoll, did you have anything to add?

1377
02:13:42.412 --> 02:13:42.507
<v Loretta Smith>No.

1378
02:13:43.215 --> 02:13:43.407
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

1379
02:13:44.338 --> 02:13:57.087
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Seeing no one else in the queue, we are going to move this to second reading at our September meeting and close this agenda item.

1380
02:13:58.307 --> 02:14:05.195
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We do have another agenda item open today, colleagues, establishing the new committee council structure.

1381
02:14:08.170 --> 02:14:28.725
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>This is an item that we debated in a work session, and following that work session, a number of councilors asked that our colleagues who had brought forward proposals on our committee structure sit down together and try to capture what those proposals were.

1382
02:14:29.359 --> 02:14:29.863
<v Nancy Thorington>Okay.

1383
02:14:31.939 --> 02:14:44.280
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dunphy has put forward an amendment that captures that, which is kind of the most boiled-down version of what folks thought they heard from our colleagues.

1384
02:14:46.108 --> 02:14:50.310
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>There are also amendments to that, as Councilor Dunphy mentioned, to build back up.

1385
02:14:51.341 --> 02:15:05.442
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I have put in an amendment with an additional idea for fewer committees following conversations with a few people as well as with some of our staff around how we might set up a structure.

1386
02:15:05.506 --> 02:15:10.854
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>The idea of having 4 committees seemed like an option that we should also consider.

1387
02:15:10.935 --> 02:15:18.311
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So I tried to capture how we might get there based again on the conversation that we had heard.

1388
02:15:18.975 --> 02:15:24.740
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And Councilor Novick has an amendment which is now posted, described earlier.

1389
02:15:24.837 --> 02:15:25.338
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Novick.

1390
02:15:26.310 --> 02:15:32.662
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Around how chairs or co-chairs might meet with our presiding officers.

1391
02:15:35.759 --> 02:15:47.667
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dunphy, how do you want to go about taking on the amendments that you have put forward?

1392
02:15:48.506 --> 02:15:50.815
<v Jamie Dunphy>Well, I'd like to approach them individually.

1393
02:15:51.390 --> 02:15:57.271
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think there are 4 separate issues that I think require each an up and down vote from this body.

1394
02:15:58.497 --> 02:16:04.288
<v Jamie Dunphy>I can briefly outline all 4 of them if that's helpful and we can discuss them in order or we can go through one by one at a time.

1395
02:16:04.966 --> 02:16:16.944
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think that there is— I am noting a potential conflict between Dunphy Amendment A and Novick's amendment just in terms of language.

1396
02:16:17.056 --> 02:16:20.576
<v Jamie Dunphy>And so we may need some clarification as we get further into this process.

1397
02:16:21.729 --> 02:16:25.112
<v Jamie Dunphy>But however you would like me to approach this, I'm happy to.

1398
02:16:25.752 --> 02:16:26.988
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Why don't we do them one at a time?

1399
02:16:27.036 --> 02:16:32.613
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And colleagues, I just want to note also that there are some calendars posted as supplemental information.

1400
02:16:33.207 --> 02:16:36.654
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I mentioned in an email to everybody, but we'll just put on the record as well.

1401
02:16:36.718 --> 02:16:45.934
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>None of those are meant to be an official calendar that we are adopting, but just a way to give everyone an idea of how our workflow might look.

1402
02:16:46.496 --> 02:16:59.823
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>As informed by staff in Council Operations and the Clerk's Office on what workflows would fit best for our supporting teams depending on some of the choices that we might make today.

1403
02:17:01.268 --> 02:17:04.719
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dunphy, why don't you go ahead and introduce your first amendment?

1404
02:17:05.361 --> 02:17:05.716
<v Jamie Dunphy>Sure.

1405
02:17:06.261 --> 02:17:17.777
<v Jamie Dunphy>Well, I'm also wondering whether or not we should take your amendment first because to some extent, some of my amendments do speak to there being 5 committees.

1406
02:17:17.841 --> 02:17:24.846
<v Jamie Dunphy>And so I'm happy to— well, I guess whatever the body thinks, but I'm happy to start us off, or unless you wanted to take yours first.

1407
02:17:27.665 --> 02:17:29.090
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Let's— I'm looking at what you have.

1408
02:17:33.832 --> 02:17:37.620
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think other than C, we can probably move forward with your amendments.

1409
02:17:37.895 --> 02:17:39.433
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay, great.

1410
02:17:39.659 --> 02:17:40.566
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>At least do A and B.

1411
02:17:40.664 --> 02:17:41.295
<v Jamie Dunphy>Let's do A and B.

1412
02:17:41.343 --> 02:17:42.087
<v Jamie Dunphy>So Dunphy Amendment A.

1413
02:17:42.914 --> 02:17:53.234
<v Jamie Dunphy>This is us calling the question on whether or not to have a co-chair model or a vice chair model or chair-vice chair model or maximum flexibility.

1414
02:17:53.282 --> 02:18:08.538
<v Jamie Dunphy>For the purposes of my amendment, I am proposing that the City Council have a chair-vice chair model for the committees with the responsibilities outlined for each of the chair and the vice chair and the responsibilities for both.

1415
02:18:08.586 --> 02:18:08.715
<v Loretta Smith>Second.

1416
02:18:09.529 --> 02:18:11.673
<v Jamie Dunphy>I'm happy to read it out loud, but folks also can read.

1417
02:18:11.898 --> 02:18:13.284
<v Jamie Dunphy>All right.

1418
02:18:13.495 --> 02:18:15.622
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And Councilor, can we pause for one minute?

1419
02:18:15.688 --> 02:18:22.019
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Did we— I think that previously I hadn't taken seconds on these since there were multiple in this document.

1420
02:18:22.067 --> 02:18:25.302
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So I want to make sure as we go through these that we do get a second on each of them.

1421
02:18:25.384 --> 02:18:26.403
<v Jamie Dunphy>Sure, absolutely.

1422
02:18:26.871 --> 02:18:37.938
<v Jamie Dunphy>Just briefly reading Dunphy Amendment A, it reads that D2.1, each committee shall be administered by a chair and vice chair.

1423
02:18:38.179 --> 02:18:43.494
<v Jamie Dunphy>Subsection A, the chair's responsibilities shall include: I, leading each committee meeting.

1424
02:18:44.906 --> 02:18:46.384
<v Jamie Dunphy>Double I, 2, I guess.

1425
02:18:46.994 --> 02:18:54.268
<v Jamie Dunphy>Representing each committee on the leadership team and communicating upcoming topics from the administration to the vice chair and other members of the committee.

1426
02:18:55.343 --> 02:19:07.650
<v Jamie Dunphy>Section B, the vice chair's responsibilities shall include chairing committee meetings when the chair is absent, Chairing temporary or joint committee subgroups as needed to tackle subject— specific subject areas.

1427
02:19:08.809 --> 02:19:22.827
<v Jamie Dunphy>Section C, both chair and vice chair shall be responsible for tracking policy implementation within the administration to ensure policy goals are reached and collaborating on committee agenda topics and coordinating with councilors and staff to bring salient issues to the committee.

1428
02:19:23.671 --> 02:19:24.984
<v Jamie Dunphy>And I would entertain a second.

1429
02:19:25.778 --> 02:19:26.004
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Second.

1430
02:19:28.989 --> 02:19:30.759
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Seconded by Councilor Koyama Lane.

1431
02:19:31.916 --> 02:19:34.733
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Knoll, are you in the queue to debate Dunphy Amendment A?

1432
02:19:35.135 --> 02:19:36.003
<v Sameer Kanal>No, Madam President.

1433
02:19:36.084 --> 02:19:37.515
<v Sameer Kanal>I'm in the queue to ask a question.

1434
02:19:37.950 --> 02:19:38.996
<v Sameer Kanal>Just a clarifying question.

1435
02:19:39.198 --> 02:19:39.584
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Go right ahead.

1436
02:19:41.319 --> 02:19:42.255
<v Sameer Kanal>What is the leadership team?

1437
02:19:42.336 --> 02:19:46.084
<v Sameer Kanal>I didn't see that anywhere else in this entire document except in a whereas.

1438
02:19:47.762 --> 02:19:48.461
<v Jamie Dunphy>That's a good point.

1439
02:19:50.960 --> 02:19:56.135
<v Sameer Kanal>It seems like in the foundational piece of information for this one, so I just wanted to understand it better.

1440
02:19:57.400 --> 02:20:00.236
<v Jamie Dunphy>That is a good point.

1441
02:20:02.001 --> 02:20:04.977
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dunphy, do you prefer to leave this as is?

1442
02:20:05.091 --> 02:20:05.737
<v Rebecca Dobert>Do you prefer—.

1443
02:20:06.289 --> 02:20:09.129
<v Jamie Dunphy>Oh, sorry, I think that's sort of implied.

1444
02:20:09.227 --> 02:20:15.979
<v Jamie Dunphy>I guess it would probably need to be in Section E. I think that is Section E. It's functioning.

1445
02:20:16.045 --> 02:20:27.599
<v Jamie Dunphy>It's not referred to explicitly as a leadership team in Section E, but the committee the committee chair shall convene with the council president to coordinate agendas, priorities, overall strategy, and on convening ad hoc workgroups as needed, which is in the underlying.

1446
02:20:28.765 --> 02:20:34.636
<v Jamie Dunphy>It is not explicitly called a leadership team, and I'm happy to omit the language or add it back in.

1447
02:20:38.208 --> 02:20:44.709
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dunphy, do you prefer to add the term leadership team to E, or do you prefer to take that out of Dunphy A?

1448
02:20:44.790 --> 02:20:46.583
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think I would prefer to take it out of Dunphy A.

1449
02:20:47.067 --> 02:20:57.110
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay, so it would read representing each committee and communicating upcoming topics from the administration to the— oh gosh, that doesn't read right.

1450
02:20:59.811 --> 02:21:00.860
<v Jamie Dunphy>Okay.

1451
02:21:02.858 --> 02:21:12.924
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>You could say representing each committee in Councilor—.

1452
02:21:13.694 --> 02:21:17.100
<v Jamie Dunphy>Sure, I will just omit 2A.

1453
02:21:17.742 --> 02:21:23.346
<v Jamie Dunphy>Just take that out and just keep communicating upcoming, right?

1454
02:21:23.587 --> 02:21:24.727
<v Jamie Dunphy>Like, yeah, sure.

1455
02:21:24.871 --> 02:21:26.959
<v Jamie Dunphy>Yeah, uh, actually that's a better option.

1456
02:21:27.104 --> 02:21:31.793
<v Jamie Dunphy>Uh, I would omit the words representing each committee on the leadership team.

1457
02:21:31.938 --> 02:21:38.903
<v Jamie Dunphy>And so the chair's responsibilities include communicating upcoming topics from the administration to the vice chair and other members of the committee.

1458
02:21:40.809 --> 02:21:41.055
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay.

1459
02:21:41.299 --> 02:21:42.944
<v Jamie Dunphy>Omitting the first half of the sentence.

1460
02:21:44.469 --> 02:21:44.614
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Got it.

1461
02:21:45.213 --> 02:21:48.193
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>When Councilor Koyama Lane comes back, we'll make sure that that's a friendly.

1462
02:21:49.115 --> 02:21:51.513
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But in the meantime, let's move forward there as is.

1463
02:21:52.608 --> 02:21:55.140
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, is there any debate on the amendment?

1464
02:21:57.243 --> 02:22:00.060
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Ryan?

1465
02:22:00.484 --> 02:22:03.269
<v Dan Ryan>Yes, thank you, Madam Chair— Madam President.

1466
02:22:04.117 --> 02:22:10.924
<v Dan Ryan>Councilor Dunphy, I wanna hear from you why you like the chair-vice chair model as opposed to the co-chair model.

1467
02:22:11.213 --> 02:22:21.024
<v Dan Ryan>I've experienced both and I experienced them a bit differently, but I find a lot of value in the one that I am a co-chair in.

1468
02:22:21.779 --> 02:22:34.108
<v Dan Ryan>And I think what we're getting at here is there's a direct correlation between, this is my assumption in reading this, that you like the chair-vice chair model because it supports this leadership team that we're learning about?

1469
02:22:34.701 --> 02:22:45.950
<v Jamie Dunphy>I, I, on the one hand, yes, I think that the ability for us to have a greater ability to coordinate with the president, vice president, and the work that is happening in the committees in a structured way makes a lot of sense to me.

1470
02:22:46.656 --> 02:22:50.091
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think that the co-chair model is confusing to the public in a lot of ways.

1471
02:22:50.604 --> 02:22:57.558
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think that in a lot of circumstances I'm seeing it work very well for some of our colleagues, but I don't know that that is I think that's a good point.

1472
02:22:57.685 --> 02:23:02.792
<v Jamie Dunphy>I don't think that is necessarily a sustainable model depending on future councils.

1473
02:23:05.467 --> 02:23:09.269
<v Jamie Dunphy>And I think it's just broadly generally a confusing model.

1474
02:23:09.528 --> 02:23:21.165
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think that it, to some degree, I just think that a hierarchy makes sense with regard to communication and leadership within a committee.

1475
02:23:24.316 --> 02:23:34.416
<v Jamie Dunphy>I worry that to some extent it is not— the co-chair model isn't inherently for the health of the body, but rather for the health of egos of elected officials.

1476
02:23:35.079 --> 02:23:39.122
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think that if everybody is a leader, then nobody is a leader, and it doesn't matter at that point.

1477
02:23:39.219 --> 02:23:45.170
<v Jamie Dunphy>And I think we aren't able to move forward with any sort of strategic vision for the broader body.

1478
02:23:46.389 --> 02:23:47.065
<v Dan Ryan>Okay, thank you.

1479
02:23:47.164 --> 02:24:01.540
<v Dan Ryan>I think what I need to hear from maybe perhaps I'm in the queue, and why don't I address that then, just so that I don't cut in front of others?

1480
02:24:01.813 --> 02:24:03.052
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Are you comfortable with that, Councilor?

1481
02:24:03.182 --> 02:24:06.467
<v Dan Ryan>I think I'll just end with a statement that we're clearly, you know, divided.

1482
02:24:06.788 --> 02:24:08.958
<v Dan Ryan>The media's picked up on this of late, of course.

1483
02:24:09.777 --> 02:24:12.878
<v Dan Ryan>I think it's really important to have balance no matter where we're going with this.

1484
02:24:13.778 --> 02:24:22.389
<v Dan Ryan>And if there's a room where it's happening, which is this executive team or this leadership team, then I'll be— the new fight would be about ensuring we have some balance there.

1485
02:24:24.069 --> 02:24:25.513
<v Dan Ryan>Just had to put that into the record.

1486
02:24:28.010 --> 02:24:28.460
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Novick.

1487
02:24:29.881 --> 02:24:35.238
<v Steve Novick>We talked about this a bit in a previous meeting, but I like the co-chair model.

1488
02:24:35.368 --> 02:24:38.070
<v Steve Novick>I think it works well where it's being used.

1489
02:24:39.665 --> 02:24:41.424
<v Steve Novick>And so I don't want to remove that as a possibility.

1490
02:24:42.286 --> 02:24:53.486
<v Steve Novick>I also think that, you know, it might be about egos, but I think that it's going to be a lot more difficult for people to vote for a new committee structure if only 5 people are going to have gavels.

1491
02:24:54.064 --> 02:24:59.191
<v Steve Novick>And there's a reason— I mean, avoiding a bloodbath is a reasonable thing to think about.

1492
02:24:59.529 --> 02:25:06.915
<v Steve Novick>I also, as I said earlier today, I don't think that— I don't see the value of a leadership team.

1493
02:25:06.979 --> 02:25:11.923
<v Steve Novick>For one thing, I think that this this is a council that doesn't consist of people who generally follow leaders.

1494
02:25:12.180 --> 02:25:16.097
<v Steve Novick>I think they're more aligned with Bob Dylan's line, don't follow leaders, watch the parking meters.

1495
02:25:17.237 --> 02:25:26.663
<v Steve Novick>And I think that having a mysterious leadership team making decisions that they by definition couldn't share with other people because that would violate public meetings law would be a problem.

1496
02:25:27.192 --> 02:25:32.556
<v Steve Novick>So again, my amendment proposes that we just sort of, I don't even know if this is necessary to write this down, that we can have—.

1497
02:25:32.556 --> 02:25:32.844
<v Sameer Kanal>Councilor Smith.

1498
02:25:36.659 --> 02:25:46.479
<v Steve Novick>Thank you, Councilor.

1499
02:25:46.479 --> 02:25:50.639
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Smith.

1500
02:25:50.639 --> 02:25:52.440
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you, Madam President.

1501
02:25:52.500 --> 02:25:59.319
<v Loretta Smith>And Councilor Dunphy, I'm trying to figure— I was looking at your Dunphy A.

1502
02:25:59.319 --> 02:26:01.379
<v Loretta Smith>Now, does that include that there must be a committee referral report?

1503
02:26:01.413 --> 02:26:05.522
<v Loretta Smith>Be only— you said at least one chair from each committee.

1504
02:26:07.020 --> 02:26:10.862
<v Loretta Smith>Is, is that a part of your, of your proposal?

1505
02:26:11.477 --> 02:26:14.399
<v Jamie Dunphy>Uh, yeah, there would be a, a chair and a vice chair for each committee.

1506
02:26:15.030 --> 02:26:15.239
<v Loretta Smith>Okay.

1507
02:26:15.289 --> 02:26:16.984
<v Loretta Smith>And from each, uh, district?

1508
02:26:17.129 --> 02:26:18.500
<v Jamie Dunphy>Uh, that is, that is Dunphy B.

1509
02:26:18.677 --> 02:26:18.855
<v Jamie Dunphy>We will—.

1510
02:26:18.855 --> 02:26:19.582
<v Loretta Smith>That's Dunphy B.

1511
02:26:19.646 --> 02:26:20.388
<v Jamie Dunphy>Go to that in a second.

1512
02:26:20.518 --> 02:26:20.630
<v Loretta Smith>Okay.

1513
02:26:20.710 --> 02:26:23.615
<v Loretta Smith>So that's what I was wanting to talk about.

1514
02:26:23.681 --> 02:26:48.799
<v Loretta Smith>I, I just want to say for the record, I think that, um, in terms of condensing confusion or, or, or less confusion, that changing this whole committee system, whether it be to your Dunphy A or, or B, I think we should actually wait to do these kinds of things until the top of the year because we agreed not to change presidents every 6 months.

1515
02:26:49.474 --> 02:26:53.584
<v Loretta Smith>And I think making all these different changes is confusing to the public.

1516
02:26:54.082 --> 02:26:58.128
<v Loretta Smith>I like the idea of where we're at right now, and then we change it at the top of the year.

1517
02:26:58.176 --> 02:26:58.336
<v Candace Avalos>Thank you.

1518
02:26:58.787 --> 02:27:01.820
<v Loretta Smith>If there's going to be a change in president or otherwise.

1519
02:27:01.917 --> 02:27:04.454
<v Loretta Smith>I think we just confuse the people too much.

1520
02:27:04.647 --> 02:27:16.255
<v Loretta Smith>And if we're talking about our bureaus, now our bureaus have to go through another level of understanding, new chairs, the whole nine yards.

1521
02:27:16.304 --> 02:27:20.415
<v Loretta Smith>So I'd like to stay where we're at.

1522
02:27:20.799 --> 02:27:21.218
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

1523
02:27:22.389 --> 02:27:26.468
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor thank you, Councilor.

1524
02:27:28.416 --> 02:27:35.292
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think I'm next in the queue, so I'll address Councilor Ryan's question and wanted to mention one other thing as well.

1525
02:27:35.356 --> 02:27:49.908
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Ryan, in terms of the leadership team, I have foreseen using that space not for substantive conversations about what we want to do on items in a way that Councilor Novick has suggested, yes.

1526
02:27:50.038 --> 02:27:56.576
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Which might absolutely violate serial meetings laws if people talk to each other.

1527
02:27:57.268 --> 02:28:26.057
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But as a space, for example, to say if we have an evening committee meeting, allow chairs to come together and talk about what items they have coming up on their agenda where they might need to use an evening meeting space to take more public testimony and who has things coming up more quickly and how do we figure out who could use that time, um, this month, next month, the month after.

1528
02:28:26.537 --> 02:28:47.898
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Those more, um, administrative items, um, things like how are folks managing testimony in their committee and are there new practices that we want to put in place where it's helpful to have everybody in the room and having it really be a more administrative space than substantive space.

1529
02:28:48.557 --> 02:28:53.430
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So I think that it would be very helpful to have for those reasons.

1530
02:28:53.685 --> 02:29:06.060
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think that as council president, I have run into a number of situations where I would have liked to be able to very quickly sit down with all of the committee chairs and say, hey, here's an idea.

1531
02:29:06.125 --> 02:29:11.016
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Hey, here's a thing that I think we should be doing differently in terms of how how council and committee work together.

1532
02:29:11.979 --> 02:29:18.113
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>When we have backlogs of items, to be able to sit down with everybody and hash out some of those things would be helpful.

1533
02:29:18.644 --> 02:29:27.586
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Right now, I try to do that in one-offs when they come up with specific committees, but I think it would be fantastic for me as a leader to have that space.

1534
02:29:27.891 --> 02:29:29.722
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>If we decide not to have that space, that's okay.

1535
02:29:29.802 --> 02:29:30.477
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We haven't had it.

1536
02:29:30.525 --> 02:29:31.745
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I can move forward without it.

1537
02:29:31.809 --> 02:29:34.362
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But those are the types of reasons that I would like to have that space.

1538
02:29:34.459 --> 02:29:34.683
<v Rebecca Dobert>Thank you.

1539
02:29:34.989 --> 02:29:37.121
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>May I ask a follow-up?

1540
02:29:37.811 --> 02:29:38.068
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Sure.

1541
02:29:38.388 --> 02:29:40.715
<v Dan Ryan>Okay, I appreciate what you just said.

1542
02:29:40.875 --> 02:29:47.096
<v Dan Ryan>My question is also about the composite, 'cause you seem to be in favor of a chair, vice chair, not co-chairs.

1543
02:29:47.674 --> 02:29:56.912
<v Dan Ryan>And if shared leadership of the co-chairs can figure it out on who to bring to that meeting, say it's monthly, why would there be opposition to that?

1544
02:29:57.153 --> 02:30:00.888
<v Dan Ryan>And my point is also that I really think it's important that we have balance in that group.

1545
02:30:01.549 --> 02:30:06.621
<v Dan Ryan>And I would worry if all the chairs were from one side of this aisle that seems to be emerging.

1546
02:30:08.408 --> 02:30:09.134
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1547
02:30:09.213 --> 02:30:14.055
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I'll move into the other things I wanted to say generally and why I joined the queue.

1548
02:30:14.136 --> 02:30:17.704
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I think that that might address some of what you just raised.

1549
02:30:19.049 --> 02:30:27.061
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, I'm not supportive of this amendment because when I first brought forward to you all a committee structure, Councilor Smith.

1550
02:30:27.158 --> 02:30:35.409
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>When I talked about the committee structure with some co-chairs and some chairs and vice chairs, I said that I was doing so very intentionally to create the precedent that we could have either one.

1551
02:30:37.139 --> 02:30:43.888
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>As we think about changing committees, I think it's very possible that we could have a situation where we have only chairs and vice chairs.

1552
02:30:44.644 --> 02:30:52.773
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But I don't want to write that somewhere because I think that that undoes the precedent setting of saying we are okay with having either of these things.

1553
02:30:53.621 --> 02:31:03.433
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Sure that whatever this council needs in the future and whatever a president of this council needs in the future, they can bring forward as a proposal to the body as a whole to vote on.

1554
02:31:04.174 --> 02:31:09.876
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I don't want to arbitrarily say we shouldn't do one or we should always do the other.

1555
02:31:11.754 --> 02:31:17.810
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>In terms of balance, I want to address that point, which is not something that's here.

1556
02:31:18.004 --> 02:31:19.647
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>This is just about do we want Councilor Smith.

1557
02:31:19.694 --> 02:31:19.952
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Mayor.

1558
02:31:20.001 --> 02:31:20.854
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm not proposing to change what our committees are.

1559
02:31:20.950 --> 02:31:30.617
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And if this passes, then our code would require me to bring forward a proposal to this body on committee membership, which I would intend to do at our first meeting after the recess.

1560
02:31:32.809 --> 02:31:34.817
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>But this change would create winners and losers.

1561
02:31:35.155 --> 02:31:36.136
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>It certainly would.

1562
02:31:36.537 --> 02:31:45.688
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Decreasing the number of chairs means that— or the number of committees means that we would decrease the number of folks around the dais holding gavels.

1563
02:31:46.708 --> 02:31:50.954
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think that's a point that we all need to go into this knowing.

1564
02:31:51.149 --> 02:31:52.674
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We need to be open-eyed about that.

1565
02:31:53.500 --> 02:31:58.656
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>To Councilor Dunphy's point, when everybody leads, nobody leads is perhaps the right approach.

1566
02:31:58.786 --> 02:32:03.529
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>To Councilor Ryan's point, when you give everybody an opportunity to lead, you have more voices.

1567
02:32:04.134 --> 02:32:05.917
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think that those are both very valid points.

1568
02:32:10.090 --> 02:32:19.141
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I do, because I have heard away from this dais from a number of people concerns about how I might approach leadership moving forward.

1569
02:32:19.206 --> 02:32:37.301
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Just want to state for the record, for all of you and for others listening, that I have tried to approach this work from the start, and I shared with some of my colleagues before any of us were seated, before my name was out there for council president, that it's how I would approach my work in any position here.

1570
02:32:38.286 --> 02:32:45.628
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Trying to make sure that many voices get heard because I generally think that when you listen and respond to your opposition, you come up with better policy.

1571
02:32:47.872 --> 02:33:04.682
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So I hope that as we go through this, I don't have folks impugning my values and the way that I would approach things by suggesting that I would intentionally politically create a system where we have Councilor Smith.

1572
02:33:05.230 --> 02:33:09.426
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I would not have all chairs from one perspective or another.

1573
02:33:09.556 --> 02:33:23.117
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I don't believe that there are only 2 perspectives on this council, but I certainly would not pull all from one or the other for a leadership team that I was creating at a time when I'm leading this body.

1574
02:33:26.349 --> 02:33:28.737
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Knoll.

1575
02:33:29.130 --> 02:33:30.095
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Madam President.

1576
02:33:31.861 --> 02:33:35.532
<v Sameer Kanal>I agree completely with everything that Councilor Ryan said in his previous comments.

1577
02:33:35.790 --> 02:33:39.460
<v Sameer Kanal>So maybe we're not as divided as we might say.

1578
02:33:40.423 --> 02:33:44.591
<v Sameer Kanal>I have a question just to clarify, Madam President.

1579
02:33:45.311 --> 02:34:03.629
<v Sameer Kanal>Your description of what you would use a theoretical leadership team for, my understanding, and I'm gonna use a very specific quote here, is that that would not include, quote, any determination, action, vote, or final disposition upon a motion, proposal, order, resolution, ordinance, or measure on which a vote of a governing body is required.

1580
02:34:04.721 --> 02:34:10.148
<v Sameer Kanal>And, and that is because you're talking about administrative uses, and that's my understanding.

1581
02:34:10.197 --> 02:34:19.943
<v Sameer Kanal>I don't want to hold you legally to it, but my understanding of your, your, uh, uh, thematic approach to it, I think that squares as those are 2 separate ideas, right?

1582
02:34:19.992 --> 02:34:25.459
<v Sameer Kanal>We wouldn't be using that to deliberate upon things that whether or not to pass or fail an item.

1583
02:34:26.938 --> 02:34:30.360
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>My intent would not be to bring forward items like that.

1584
02:34:30.698 --> 02:34:33.287
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I don't wanna speak to what somebody might do in the future.

1585
02:34:33.915 --> 02:34:34.480
<v Sameer Kanal>Fair enough.

1586
02:34:34.802 --> 02:34:35.932
<v Sameer Kanal>I appreciate that distinction.

1587
02:34:36.335 --> 02:34:40.483
<v Sameer Kanal>I quote that, that's from the public meetings law, state public meetings law.

1588
02:34:41.100 --> 02:34:47.567
<v Sameer Kanal>And it is my— it's my way of saying I'm not sure that a leadership team needs to only have 6 people on it.

1589
02:34:49.734 --> 02:34:54.084
<v Sameer Kanal>Because I'm not sure the public meetings law applies to the idea of sharing information in the first place.

1590
02:34:54.908 --> 02:35:00.261
<v Sameer Kanal>That's immaterial to my reason for opposing this amendment, but I do think it's relevant information too.

1591
02:35:00.648 --> 02:35:09.286
<v Sameer Kanal>And that's ORS 192.610, Section 1, Part 2, as retitled in the most recent update to it.

1592
02:35:11.308 --> 02:35:14.995
<v Sameer Kanal>So I think that that's one framing piece of information.

1593
02:35:15.060 --> 02:35:15.174
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

1594
02:35:15.826 --> 02:35:16.066
<v Sameer Kanal>Bless you.

1595
02:35:16.388 --> 02:35:27.560
<v Sameer Kanal>And so what I, what I would say is the 5 co-chairs who are current— 5 councilors who are currently co-chairs all spoke in favor of the co-chair model last time, uh, when we did the work session.

1596
02:35:27.625 --> 02:35:33.796
<v Sameer Kanal>And I'll just point out that working with, uh, Councilor Novick has been, um, very— a good experience for me.

1597
02:35:34.181 --> 02:35:44.831
<v Sameer Kanal>And part of the reason why is it forces us to actually subsume our egos in some ways to, to talk with each other because we have different approaches We have different networks and knowledge bases.

1598
02:35:45.248 --> 02:35:57.537
<v Sameer Kanal>And so that act of creating, of co-creation of an agenda is actually, I think, healthy for elected officials who, I don't know if anyone out there might guess this, but it occasionally happens that an elected official has an ego.

1599
02:35:58.100 --> 02:35:58.838
<v Sameer Kanal>I think so.

1600
02:35:59.352 --> 02:36:03.465
<v Sameer Kanal>So I think we're in a good place with that particular thing.

1601
02:36:03.576 --> 02:36:09.665
<v Sameer Kanal>And I agree with the approach that Councilor Smith brought up around letting this kind of play out a little bit.

1602
02:36:09.739 --> 02:36:13.925
<v Sameer Kanal>Until— on at least this specific issue, until New Year's.

1603
02:36:14.153 --> 02:36:25.154
<v Sameer Kanal>And also Councilor Zimmerman's previous point about not over-limiting the role of the council president, because that's what this would do before that second resolution that would have to come up.

1604
02:36:25.729 --> 02:36:28.994
<v Sameer Kanal>So those are my reasons why I'll be voting no on it.

1605
02:36:29.397 --> 02:36:59.436
<v Sameer Kanal>The other point I'll make is that even if the goal was to achieve a 6-person or fewer the only distinction that seems— the only 2 distinctions that seem to be happening here between a chair and a vice chair, one is whether or not they're a part of this leadership team or not, and the other is whether or not they're swapping the gavels, or one is always the primary and the other is always the secondary if the first person's not present.

1606
02:36:59.886 --> 02:37:02.726
<v Sameer Kanal>And that latter one does not appear to be a high priority to anybody.

1607
02:37:02.773 --> 02:37:03.318
<v Sameer Kanal>I think it's a good idea.

1608
02:37:04.234 --> 02:37:05.084
<v Sameer Kanal>Correct me if I'm wrong.

1609
02:37:05.519 --> 02:37:17.048
<v Sameer Kanal>So even, I even think the goal of that could be achieved by just designating one of 2 co-chairs in that scenario as the person who goes to a hypothetical leadership team should one be created in the future.

1610
02:37:18.188 --> 02:37:22.281
<v Sameer Kanal>And I'm very open to Councilor Novick's other comments on whether or not to structure it that way as well.

1611
02:37:22.361 --> 02:37:25.349
<v Sameer Kanal>And I'm looking forward to that amendment, but I'll be voting no on this one.

1612
02:37:25.734 --> 02:37:25.975
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

1613
02:37:26.938 --> 02:37:27.532
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1614
02:37:27.596 --> 02:37:28.318
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Murillo.

1615
02:37:31.127 --> 02:37:32.218
<v Angelita Morillo>Thank you, Council President.

1616
02:37:32.570 --> 02:37:40.478
<v Angelita Morillo>I was going to say that I also agree with Councilor Ryan, so maybe we can start a tally sheet of when we agree and maybe make a bingo game out of it.

1617
02:37:41.458 --> 02:37:43.478
<v Angelita Morillo>I think that co-chairs are really important.

1618
02:37:43.863 --> 02:37:49.430
<v Angelita Morillo>I don't think it's about ego, though I agree a lot of elected officials run for office because we think we're so special.

1619
02:37:49.558 --> 02:38:08.940
<v Angelita Morillo>But the co-chair model I have found actually creates a much more balanced committee because and what, for example, I've had a really great time talking with Councilor Novick as co-chair of the Climate Committee.

1620
02:38:09.159 --> 02:38:18.149
<v Angelita Morillo>I think we have different relationships within community, within government, with different experts and who we choose to bring to the table.

1621
02:38:18.159 --> 02:38:25.079
<v Angelita Morillo>And I think that that has strengthened our committee and made it really just brought a wide array of voices to the table that we would have not otherwise had.

1622
02:38:25.079 --> 02:38:25.120
<v Angelita Morillo>Thank you.

1623
02:38:25.224 --> 02:38:26.484
<v Angelita Morillo>We wouldn't have had otherwise.

1624
02:38:26.936 --> 02:38:33.679
<v Angelita Morillo>So I have found that the co-chair model brings a lot of balance and nuance to the work that we do, and I think it's really important.

1625
02:38:35.281 --> 02:38:43.077
<v Angelita Morillo>I also just firmly disagree with the idea, like, at the end of the day, when you have a gavel, you have power over what gets heard.

1626
02:38:43.207 --> 02:38:48.715
<v Angelita Morillo>You have power over who gets a seat at the table, who— what gets put on the public record.

1627
02:38:49.134 --> 02:38:50.630
<v Angelita Morillo>It is a huge power to have.

1628
02:38:50.679 --> 02:38:50.968
<v Dan Ryan>Councilor Smith.

1629
02:38:51.584 --> 02:39:08.218
<v Angelita Morillo>So I think that good leadership is actually being able to learn how to share power, and especially under our new government structure where we have different districts that we're representing and such a wide array of voices at the table, we have an opportunity to share power in a way that we never have before.

1630
02:39:08.968 --> 02:39:11.034
<v Angelita Morillo>And I think that we should seriously consider that.

1631
02:39:11.115 --> 02:39:14.157
<v Angelita Morillo>So for those reasons, I'll be a no on this amendment.

1632
02:39:17.329 --> 02:39:18.238
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1633
02:39:18.385 --> 02:39:19.487
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Koyama Lane.

1634
02:39:21.159 --> 02:39:21.954
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you, Madam President.

1635
02:39:23.350 --> 02:39:41.563
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>With many of these things coming up, I am trying to balance what might be best for this body and our needs in terms of how we're working together and our culture and our flow, and then what I would imagine would be best down the road, put in place for many years.

1636
02:39:41.837 --> 02:39:46.164
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>That's attention for me, just to be transparent.

1637
02:39:46.629 --> 02:39:56.713
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>This idea of how to bring in more councilors, whether it's leadership team or just in general into some meetings, I don't think that's controversial between us.

1638
02:39:56.842 --> 02:40:01.112
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I think it's something we're talking a lot about and maybe have some different ideas of how that could look.

1639
02:40:01.722 --> 02:40:12.625
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>On Monday mornings, we meet with the mayor and all of the DCAs and do some sending of Committee, uh, sending of— sent their items to different committees.

1640
02:40:13.202 --> 02:40:16.736
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Maybe that's a place where other folks can step in, maybe not.

1641
02:40:17.298 --> 02:40:23.638
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Um, maybe part of this is having primaries for DCAs, which is something that I heard from Mr. Jordan that could be helpful.

1642
02:40:24.699 --> 02:40:27.027
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'm not sure about what that looks like.

1643
02:40:27.106 --> 02:40:30.799
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I am— I'm not sure if that actually should be in code or outlined in code.

1644
02:40:30.863 --> 02:40:33.064
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I think that's something that we want some flexibility with.

1645
02:40:33.915 --> 02:40:36.640
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I feel similarly with chairs and co-chairs.

1646
02:40:37.173 --> 02:40:41.933
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>If I'm being honest, what I think is best for down the road for clarity is chair and vice chair.

1647
02:40:43.191 --> 02:40:53.490
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And I'm leaning more for the health of this body for there to be some more flexibility, especially as we are trying to build some trust and figure this out.

1648
02:40:54.933 --> 02:40:56.310
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>So right now I am a no.

1649
02:40:58.186 --> 02:40:58.915
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1650
02:40:59.001 --> 02:40:59.645
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Green.

1651
02:41:02.302 --> 02:41:02.690
<v Mitch Green>Thank you.

1652
02:41:03.978 --> 02:41:12.266
<v Mitch Green>I went into this not really knowing where I was going to land on this because it's such a hard one for me because I see— I can see it both ways.

1653
02:41:12.397 --> 02:41:12.834
<v Mitch Green>I really can.

1654
02:41:12.931 --> 02:41:15.813
<v Mitch Green>It's quite efficient to have a pretty expected hierarchy.

1655
02:41:15.861 --> 02:41:17.189
<v Mitch Green>I'm sorry for my leisure wear.

1656
02:41:17.399 --> 02:41:19.084
<v Mitch Green>I wanted to wear a Western shirt today.

1657
02:41:19.197 --> 02:41:20.751
<v Mitch Green>I realize that now I'm on the camera.

1658
02:41:22.471 --> 02:41:25.013
<v Mitch Green>But I've been convinced by this argument.

1659
02:41:25.324 --> 02:41:29.451
<v Mitch Green>I mean, like the co-chair thing and Council President, sorry for the levity.

1660
02:41:29.934 --> 02:41:44.215
<v Mitch Green>Council President, you, you raised some really important, um, things for us to think about, which is that the job that you have is to balance things and to think about what is for the best health of our governing body.

1661
02:41:45.236 --> 02:41:54.397
<v Mitch Green>And based upon who gets elected to these positions, you're not necessarily going to be able to solve that equation in a rigid model.

1662
02:41:54.511 --> 02:41:54.575
<v Rebecca Dobert>Right.

1663
02:41:54.862 --> 02:41:59.024
<v Mitch Green>So some years it may be, maybe all chairs and vice chairs.

1664
02:41:59.074 --> 02:42:00.718
<v Mitch Green>Some years it may be all co-chairs.

1665
02:42:00.832 --> 02:42:05.522
<v Mitch Green>But I think there needs to be a degree of freedom to kind of wiggle in that space.

1666
02:42:05.585 --> 02:42:13.586
<v Mitch Green>So I think at this point I am leaning— I am, I am prepared to vote no on this, um, to keep that flexibility.

1667
02:42:13.780 --> 02:42:19.844
<v Mitch Green>But I also wanted to say another thing was, was I, I don't think that we should impugn the council president's motives.

1668
02:42:20.474 --> 02:42:24.362
<v Mitch Green>On who gets assigned to these seats.

1669
02:42:25.718 --> 02:42:29.398
<v Mitch Green>I think she has tried to balance things.

1670
02:42:29.447 --> 02:42:37.854
<v Mitch Green>I may disagree with the theory of change and that balance for the sake of balance is what's for the best of all of us, but I see the balance nevertheless.

1671
02:42:38.353 --> 02:43:00.799
<v Mitch Green>And I think that if I was ever in a situation where I didn't think that my thank you, Councilor.

1672
02:43:00.799 --> 02:43:02.559
<v Mitch Green>Councilor Novick?

1673
02:43:02.559 --> 02:43:12.540
<v Steve Novick>I just wanted to say that I think that the theme of we don't have to write everything down is one that we can apply to a lot of the issues here, like in terms of what Councilor— Vice President Koyama Lane was talking about, that we don't have to write Lane everything down.

1674
02:43:12.649 --> 02:43:22.022
<v Steve Novick>Was saying about being useful to have, or what you, Madam President, were saying about useful sometimes to have chairs in meetings with the executive.

1675
02:43:23.527 --> 02:43:25.564
<v Steve Novick>It doesn't necessarily have to be all the chairs all the time.

1676
02:43:25.854 --> 02:43:31.449
<v Steve Novick>I mean, if they identify what issues they want to talk about, you could ask a couple of the chairs of a couple of the committees to come to that meeting.

1677
02:43:31.611 --> 02:43:39.654
<v Steve Novick>So I think that instead of like saying there will be a leadership team that shall do this, I think you could achieve the same goal by being a little more freewheeling.

1678
02:43:43.281 --> 02:43:43.668
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1679
02:43:43.750 --> 02:43:44.540
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Avalos.

1680
02:43:48.110 --> 02:44:03.715
<v Candace Avalos>Coming in, I think that my feelings towards this amendment were of support, and I do generally, um, still think that it would be good to have a more clear, uh, clear delineation of leadership.

1681
02:44:03.780 --> 02:44:22.529
<v Candace Avalos>And part of it is because I'm still grappling with where are we headed as a So I think that's why this vote is complicated for me, because I think I was coming in feeling that this would be the best option so that it would clear the way to make more sense logistically for what a leadership team could look like.

1682
02:44:22.674 --> 02:44:31.661
<v Candace Avalos>Because I don't think that this whole, like, co-chair and then we pick one, I don't think that that's equitable, or I think that would be a little bit messier.

1683
02:44:31.709 --> 02:44:32.067
<v Candace Avalos>Councilor Loretta Smith.

1684
02:44:32.731 --> 02:44:48.200
<v Candace Avalos>That being said, I think in the beginning when it was originally proposed as a, like, we should keep it flexible so that each committee could have its own structure, it's clear that councilors are experiencing that in different ways, and I think that's okay.

1685
02:44:49.318 --> 02:44:58.563
<v Candace Avalos>And I definitely agree with Councilor Morillo's points just around, like, what shared governance looks like, and I can see that argument.

1686
02:44:58.611 --> 02:44:59.663
<v Candace Avalos>I see both of the arguments.

1687
02:44:59.808 --> 02:45:02.104
<v Candace Avalos>And again, I kind of came in leaning towards this.

1688
02:45:02.154 --> 02:45:10.341
<v Candace Avalos>Councilor but I guess now I'm leaning away from it just for the sake of what I'm seeing is the spirit that everybody is bringing to how they're seeing the flexibility.

1689
02:45:11.254 --> 02:45:16.806
<v Candace Avalos>And I guess I'm, you know, still curious how this all lands as it relates to a leadership team.

1690
02:45:16.853 --> 02:45:25.435
<v Candace Avalos>So that's a big reason why I wanted to support it in the first place, but I guess I will not support it now due to where the discussion has headed.

1691
02:45:25.772 --> 02:45:32.317
<v Candace Avalos>But thank you, Councilor Dunphy, because him and I have talked a lot about this, and I definitely agree with the spirit of what you were doing.

1692
02:45:32.495 --> 02:45:36.250
<v Candace Avalos>I think based on what I'm hearing from my colleagues, I'm inclined to not support it.

1693
02:45:36.378 --> 02:45:39.025
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So thank you, Councilor.

1694
02:45:39.090 --> 02:45:39.877
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Clark.

1695
02:45:40.599 --> 02:45:41.818
<v Olivia Clark>Uh, thank you, Madam President.

1696
02:45:42.123 --> 02:45:45.590
<v Olivia Clark>Um, I, uh, support the amendment.

1697
02:45:46.136 --> 02:45:50.211
<v Olivia Clark>I think it's very confusing for the public to have co-chairs.

1698
02:45:50.324 --> 02:45:51.254
<v Olivia Clark>Who do we contact?

1699
02:45:51.913 --> 02:45:54.689
<v Olivia Clark>You know, I know we're in the process of birthing a new government.

1700
02:45:55.155 --> 02:45:56.149
<v Olivia Clark>I don't want twins.

1701
02:45:56.679 --> 02:45:59.279
<v Olivia Clark>I just want one, uh, one council chair.

1702
02:46:00.647 --> 02:46:01.681
<v Olivia Clark>Councilor Dunphy.

1703
02:46:04.377 --> 02:46:05.459
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal.

1704
02:46:06.154 --> 02:46:07.622
<v Sameer Kanal>Just one quick point here.

1705
02:46:07.914 --> 02:46:15.575
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, in the earlier item, I guess it was testimony for both of these, we had a, a piece of testimony that said that we don't have committee emails.

1706
02:46:16.333 --> 02:46:30.013
<v Sameer Kanal>And I think that this would help a great deal with any potential confusion that exists with the public, uh, alongside some of the other work we're doing to shorten the URLs So it can just be CAPS instead of council-and, you know, all that.

1707
02:46:30.173 --> 02:46:47.014
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, I think having a single point of contact might assist with the, um, the ability for a community member to— or, or frankly anybody— to reach out to, uh, co-chairs by saying, here's an email, goes to capscommittee@, and it forwards automatically to Councilor Novick and I.

1708
02:46:47.094 --> 02:46:54.703
<v Sameer Kanal>It's not a real email address, but I'm suggesting something like that, um, to assist with the ability to contact, um, co-chairs together.

1709
02:46:54.783 --> 02:46:54.960
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks.

1710
02:46:58.259 --> 02:46:59.064
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1711
02:46:59.787 --> 02:47:07.988
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, seeing no one else in the queue, Rebecca, could you please call the roll on Dunphy Amendment A?

1712
02:47:12.389 --> 02:47:12.978
<v Rebecca Dobert>Councilor Moline.

1713
02:47:17.210 --> 02:47:17.502
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>No.

1714
02:47:18.974 --> 02:47:19.459
<v Rebecca Dobert>Morillo?

1715
02:47:20.816 --> 02:47:20.978
<v Olivia Clark>No.

1716
02:47:22.370 --> 02:47:22.709
<v Rebecca Dobert>Novick?

1717
02:47:23.000 --> 02:47:23.243
<v Steve Novick>No.

1718
02:47:24.440 --> 02:47:24.713
<v Rebecca Dobert>Clark?

1719
02:47:24.859 --> 02:47:25.391
<v Olivia Clark>Yes, aye.

1720
02:47:26.394 --> 02:47:26.620
<v Rebecca Dobert>Green?

1721
02:47:27.315 --> 02:47:27.443
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>No.

1722
02:47:29.172 --> 02:47:29.608
<v Rebecca Dobert>Zimmerman?

1723
02:47:30.028 --> 02:47:30.190
<v Loretta Smith>Aye.

1724
02:47:31.239 --> 02:47:31.546
<v Rebecca Dobert>Avalos?

1725
02:47:33.900 --> 02:47:35.140
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Hmm, no.

1726
02:47:36.912 --> 02:47:37.346
<v Rebecca Dobert>Dunphy?

1727
02:47:38.409 --> 02:47:38.458
<v Jamie Dunphy>Aye.

1728
02:47:41.662 --> 02:47:42.016
<v Rebecca Dobert>Smith?

1729
02:47:47.012 --> 02:47:47.028
<v Loretta Smith>Aye.

1730
02:47:47.737 --> 02:47:47.898
<v Steve Novick>No.

1731
02:47:51.770 --> 02:47:51.932
<v Dan Ryan>No.

1732
02:47:55.022 --> 02:47:55.264
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>No.

1733
02:47:55.671 --> 02:48:00.084
<v Rebecca Dobert>The amendment fails with 4 aye and 8 nay votes.

1734
02:48:01.389 --> 02:48:02.409
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, colleagues.

1735
02:48:02.475 --> 02:48:04.646
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We are scheduled until 1:30 today.

1736
02:48:04.727 --> 02:48:15.627
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think we have time to do one more amendment and If we can end then or very close to then, I'm going to challenge us to do that, and then we will pick back up tomorrow where we leave off today.

1737
02:48:16.188 --> 02:48:18.352
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Dunphy, would you like to move your next amendment?

1738
02:48:19.057 --> 02:48:19.409
<v Jamie Dunphy>Absolutely.

1739
02:48:19.474 --> 02:48:20.194
<v Jamie Dunphy>Thank you, colleagues.

1740
02:48:20.275 --> 02:48:21.029
<v Jamie Dunphy>Also, that was great.

1741
02:48:21.140 --> 02:48:24.171
<v Jamie Dunphy>I'm glad we all got on the, you know, got to have the conversation.

1742
02:48:25.389 --> 02:48:27.344
<v Jamie Dunphy>Dunphy Amendment B is really very straightforward.

1743
02:48:27.554 --> 02:48:35.246
<v Jamie Dunphy>I would like it that regardless of how many committees we have, that each district is represented as a committee chair in some capacity.

1744
02:48:35.764 --> 02:48:43.365
<v Jamie Dunphy>Now that we have a co-chair model as an option, it should be certainly easier, but I think that it will be harder.

1745
02:48:43.511 --> 02:48:51.556
<v Jamie Dunphy>You know, I have heard repeatedly, I think, you know, partially because of the structure and too many committees before, that we couldn't have every district represented on every committee.

1746
02:48:52.769 --> 02:49:01.004
<v Jamie Dunphy>This resolution will move in that direction, but I think that it would also be important to designate a Councilor from each district as a chair.

1747
02:49:02.817 --> 02:49:09.926
<v Jamie Dunphy>And so Dunphy B adds subsection 4 that says each district shall have at least one chair of a policy committee.

1748
02:49:12.179 --> 02:49:14.255
<v Jamie Dunphy>And I would entertain a second if anybody's interested.

1749
02:49:14.754 --> 02:49:15.800
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Is there a second?

1750
02:49:15.897 --> 02:49:16.299
<v Mitch Green>Second.

1751
02:49:16.541 --> 02:49:17.748
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1752
02:49:17.829 --> 02:49:18.602
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal.

1753
02:49:19.134 --> 02:49:21.194
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you, Madam President.

1754
02:49:21.274 --> 02:49:25.388
<v Sameer Kanal>I have a question and then a comment.

1755
02:49:25.566 --> 02:49:29.938
<v Sameer Kanal>So and the question may also be a suggestion, I'm not sure.

1756
02:49:30.261 --> 02:49:36.288
<v Sameer Kanal>You mentioned that now that we have co-chairs available to us, that that may change the way that this is interpreted, but this still uses the word chair.

1757
02:49:36.416 --> 02:49:44.168
<v Sameer Kanal>Would it be friendly to add in the parenthetical co- so it could be either a chair or a co-chair depending on how that plays out?

1758
02:49:45.856 --> 02:49:47.670
<v Jamie Dunphy>It doesn't offend me, certainly.

1759
02:49:48.461 --> 02:49:52.781
<v Sameer Kanal>So that'd be prior to the word, it would be, well, a chair, a co-chair is still a chair.

1760
02:49:53.399 --> 02:49:54.302
<v Sameer Kanal>Are we interpreting it that way?

1761
02:49:54.368 --> 02:49:54.804
<v Sameer Kanal>Is that—.

1762
02:49:55.110 --> 02:50:04.817
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I want to look to our attorney to make sure, but my interpretation in implementing this would be that this could be a chair or co-chair the way it's written legally.

1763
02:50:04.933 --> 02:50:05.727
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Does that check?

1764
02:50:07.536 --> 02:50:08.808
<v Nancy Thorington>I think that's a fine interpretation.

1765
02:50:09.404 --> 02:50:13.979
<v Sameer Kanal>I am seeing the most emphatic thumbs up I've ever seen to that.

1766
02:50:14.092 --> 02:50:16.685
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So let's just state it clearly for the record.

1767
02:50:16.819 --> 02:50:27.000
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>2 of our attorneys have given us the thumbs up here that this could be interpreted as meaning a chair in any capacity.

1768
02:50:27.402 --> 02:50:28.028
<v Candace Avalos>Okay.

1769
02:50:28.173 --> 02:50:28.993
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Chair or co-chair.

1770
02:50:29.234 --> 02:50:29.555
<v Sameer Kanal>Thank you.

1771
02:50:29.876 --> 02:50:32.736
<v Sameer Kanal>That addresses one of my underlying concerns.

1772
02:50:33.154 --> 02:50:47.412
<v Sameer Kanal>As I think everyone may recall, I voted no on the original committees, not because of the part of their creation, their number, or their purpose, But specifically the district representation as a membership.

1773
02:50:47.492 --> 02:50:57.334
<v Sameer Kanal>And I really appreciate Councilor Dunphy for bringing this whole thing forward, for putting in that each district shall have at least one member, which is outside the scope of this amendment, but relevant here.

1774
02:50:58.111 --> 02:51:03.884
<v Sameer Kanal>Because I've been debating whether or not this is required to achieve that goal.

1775
02:51:04.417 --> 02:51:10.174
<v Sameer Kanal>I do think that with 4 committees at minimum, we'd be talking about 8 co-chairs.

1776
02:51:10.238 --> 02:51:10.335
<v Sameer Kanal>Yes.

1777
02:51:10.976 --> 02:51:13.209
<v Sameer Kanal>Uh, at maximum or 4 chairs at minimum.

1778
02:51:13.273 --> 02:51:20.206
<v Sameer Kanal>And in that scenario, it is definitely possible to achieve that without sort of manipulating the system to achieve it.

1779
02:51:20.688 --> 02:51:23.373
<v Sameer Kanal>And so as a result, I'm, I'm less concerned about it here.

1780
02:51:24.049 --> 02:51:43.963
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, I don't know that it necessarily— uh, I'm concerned about it's being implemented in the future in a way that is serving that goal primarily as opposed to serving the need of the but I also know that this isn't code, so I, I'm, I'm less concerned about it now, but I'm looking forward to hearing the debate.

1781
02:51:44.884 --> 02:51:45.546
<v Sameer Kanal>Thanks.

1782
02:51:46.417 --> 02:51:47.192
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1783
02:51:47.338 --> 02:51:48.308
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Vice President Koyama Lane.

1784
02:51:49.211 --> 02:51:50.165
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you, Madam President.

1785
02:51:50.899 --> 02:51:52.717
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I appreciate the intent behind this.

1786
02:51:52.941 --> 02:52:00.260
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Similar to membership of each committee, having someone from each district represented, that makes a lot of sense to me.

1787
02:52:00.792 --> 02:52:02.435
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I do have some concerns around the language.

1788
02:52:06.404 --> 02:52:17.592
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'm wondering if you would be open to or have thought about changing this so it says each district shall have at least one council member holding a gavel.

1789
02:52:18.558 --> 02:52:21.248
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>So that could mean it's not necessarily a policy committee.

1790
02:52:21.522 --> 02:52:28.351
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>If we end up with a finance committee with a— or role as council president, that each district would have at least one council member holding a gavel.

1791
02:52:28.415 --> 02:52:28.628
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thank you.

1792
02:52:29.565 --> 02:52:33.581
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Can I respond real quick?

1793
02:52:33.757 --> 02:52:35.354
<v Jamie Dunphy>Yeah, sorry, go right ahead.

1794
02:52:38.355 --> 02:52:40.668
<v Jamie Dunphy>I would prefer to leave it in the way it's written.

1795
02:52:41.086 --> 02:52:54.477
<v Jamie Dunphy>Coming from the east side, I want some guarantee in some capacity with language that we are using consistently throughout the rest of the document that we will have some geographic representation in leadership.

1796
02:52:55.983 --> 02:53:11.162
<v Jamie Dunphy>And I do appreciate that there could be situations in which it, you know, I mean, an ad hoc committee or a subgroup workgroup may be sufficient, but I want to make sure that we have broad representation wherever possible.

1797
02:53:11.274 --> 02:53:13.650
<v Jamie Dunphy>So that is my preference, is just to keep it as it is.

1798
02:53:16.742 --> 02:53:17.423
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1799
02:53:18.524 --> 02:53:19.547
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Zimmerman.

1800
02:53:20.292 --> 02:53:21.897
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I'm sorry, did you have any follow-up, Councilor?

1801
02:53:23.118 --> 02:53:24.088
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>No, I was just going to say thank you.

1802
02:53:25.075 --> 02:53:25.772
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Zimmerman.

1803
02:53:25.966 --> 02:53:27.503
<v Eric Zimmerman>Thanks.

1804
02:53:27.810 --> 02:53:34.260
<v Eric Zimmerman>Um, so this prepositions us to have to have at least 4 committees.

1805
02:53:34.533 --> 02:53:35.744
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think that's important to note.

1806
02:53:36.777 --> 02:53:37.728
<v Eric Zimmerman>We haven't made that decision.

1807
02:53:38.700 --> 02:53:51.898
<v Eric Zimmerman>Um, it also— I think there's a big difference between getting elected to represent your district, which we've all done, and we're all equal in that sense, but the skill set then to run a committee is different.

1808
02:53:52.332 --> 02:53:56.041
<v Eric Zimmerman>And I don't think that that is inherently given to you simply because you were elected.

1809
02:53:57.068 --> 02:54:08.004
<v Eric Zimmerman>And in this, in this theory, that could occur in a single district where we could even have 3 people who do not want to chair something, and this would say now they must.

1810
02:54:08.934 --> 02:54:22.584
<v Eric Zimmerman>Um, we are all equal in representing our districts and having been elected to represent our, our folks, but I don't think we are all equal in our right to have a gavel or to be a chair.

1811
02:54:22.713 --> 02:54:28.537
<v Eric Zimmerman>I think that is a different decision by the presiding officer to make those choices.

1812
02:54:28.585 --> 02:54:39.402
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so this amendment would complicate that in ways that I don't— you know, I'm just sitting here quickly looking.

1813
02:54:39.450 --> 02:54:42.440
<v Eric Zimmerman>It's like 2 chairs currently exist from District 1.

1814
02:54:42.635 --> 02:54:42.716
<v Eric Zimmerman>Yeah.

1815
02:54:44.275 --> 02:54:47.550
<v Eric Zimmerman>2 Co-chairs and a president exist in District 2.

1816
02:54:48.835 --> 02:54:52.625
<v Eric Zimmerman>2 Co-chairs and a vice president exist in District 3.

1817
02:54:53.974 --> 02:54:56.430
<v Eric Zimmerman>A co-chair and 2 chairs exist in District 4.

1818
02:54:56.575 --> 02:55:00.750
<v Eric Zimmerman>So from a geographic representation perspective, I'm feeling like we've hit the mark.

1819
02:55:01.938 --> 02:55:06.867
<v Eric Zimmerman>And so for, for that, I'm not looking to add more complicating or more restrictiveness to this.

1820
02:55:07.477 --> 02:55:21.879
<v Eric Zimmerman>I also think that Um, we can be respectful that we're all elected from different parts of the city, and there's a difference to this next level of leadership, which is why we take votes for things like council president and vice president.

1821
02:55:22.186 --> 02:55:26.851
<v Eric Zimmerman>Um, so for, for that reason, I, I don't think I'll be supporting this.

1822
02:55:27.270 --> 02:55:32.162
<v Eric Zimmerman>While I do believe it comes from a very genuine, transparent place, I'm just— I'm not there on this.

1823
02:55:35.157 --> 02:55:38.271
<v Loretta Smith>Uh, thank you, Madam President.

1824
02:55:38.367 --> 02:55:42.200
<v Loretta Smith>I, I, I agree with, um, Councilor Zimmerman.

1825
02:55:42.715 --> 02:55:55.806
<v Loretta Smith>I— this is confusing, and because we haven't taken a vote on the number, I'm not clear how many committee members are going to be on each, uh, committee, whether it be 4 or 5.

1826
02:55:56.368 --> 02:56:01.751
<v Loretta Smith>So that's also concerning to me that it was not identified.

1827
02:56:02.315 --> 02:56:05.587
<v Loretta Smith>So I, I agree with what you're saying, um, Councilor.

1828
02:56:10.578 --> 02:56:11.415
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1829
02:56:12.527 --> 02:56:20.042
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Before I say anything to this, I just want to acknowledge the awkwardness of me weighing in on something like this while sitting in the president's seat.

1830
02:56:20.188 --> 02:56:34.466
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I try to think about these things for the future, not for me in this seat now, but I acknowledge that it sometimes comes I am a little bit concerned about this requirement.

1831
02:56:36.530 --> 02:56:40.799
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I have heard loud and clear from folks the concerns about not having people on some committees.

1832
02:56:41.057 --> 02:56:48.290
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And in response to that, I've tried to share the various criteria that we were looking at in making those committees.

1833
02:56:49.049 --> 02:56:59.378
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And we heard just a few minutes ago that the City Attorney's Office the need to balance values when thinking about folks who are chairing committees.

1834
02:57:00.298 --> 02:57:09.921
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We have heard in this debate the need to think about interest, both in chairing a committee at all, but also interest in terms of what issues people want to work on.

1835
02:57:11.488 --> 02:57:24.622
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We are now hearing a need to include in the balance of how we pick chairs and the proposal I put forward and that we vote on geographic representation.

1836
02:57:25.552 --> 02:57:34.836
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I've heard from many of my colleagues comments about how just because somebody is in the same district doesn't mean that some of you feel like you represent the same people.

1837
02:57:35.622 --> 02:57:41.523
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I think it's my job to represent everybody in District 2, but I know that that isn't shared by everyone.

1838
02:57:42.918 --> 02:58:09.841
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And so I'm struggling to think about how I take take all of these different needs, overlay skill sets, because I think about not just does somebody have the skill set or not, but in the future when we've had a number of years of elections and we have councilors who have served for longer or less long and who have more experience in our system versus not, just that understanding of what as a committee chair one needs to do.

1839
02:58:09.969 --> 02:58:14.879
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor and when I think about holding all of those things, something has to give.

1840
02:58:16.623 --> 02:58:30.568
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So I am probably a no on this, but I would ask colleagues that if you are a yes on this, you have some thoughts for me, not necessarily here today because we're running up on time, but in the future, of what you think should give instead.

1841
02:58:31.791 --> 02:58:49.610
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Because I can't put all of those things as the top priority in figuring out who should Councilor Green, you've not spoken.

1842
02:58:50.069 --> 02:58:53.329
<v Mitch Green>Yeah, I was just going to raise a question for the carrier.

1843
02:58:54.969 --> 02:59:07.989
<v Mitch Green>Um, Councilor Dunphy, given the sort of sequencing of how we're considering resolutions and amendments, would you consider withdrawing this at this stage and being ready to reintroduce it after we've adopted a resolution that specifies who's going to chair what committees?

1844
02:59:07.989 --> 02:59:08.110
<v Mitch Green>It is just literally not possible.

1845
02:59:11.727 --> 02:59:12.860
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think that's fair.

1846
02:59:13.005 --> 02:59:25.695
<v Jamie Dunphy>I am also— I will also note that if we had, for example, 3 committees, which I can't imagine we could get below 3 committees, but if we had 3 each having co-chairs, that's 6.

1847
02:59:26.405 --> 02:59:28.273
<v Jamie Dunphy>We could pretty easily meet at that point.

1848
02:59:28.420 --> 02:59:32.641
<v Jamie Dunphy>But I do hear that perhaps there is an underlying question that we should answer first.

1849
02:59:32.690 --> 02:59:40.733
<v Jamie Dunphy>I think the underlying question is, And so, uh, and then in the interest of time, I'm happy to, uh, withdraw for now with the— wait, is it a withdrawal or a table?

1850
02:59:40.781 --> 02:59:41.200
<v Jamie Dunphy>What do I do?

1851
02:59:43.451 --> 02:59:52.363
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>I believe you would table the amendment, which normally would mean we would go to your next amendment, except that I'll note it's 1:25.

1852
02:59:52.413 --> 02:59:57.816
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>So if you do so, I will probably have us end the meeting for today and pick back up at your next amendment tomorrow.

1853
02:59:58.477 --> 03:00:10.771
<v Jamie Dunphy>I don't want to knowing we have 5 minutes left and there are some folks in the queue who may still be interested in speaking on this, I don't want to preemptively table it, but I am absolutely willing to table the amendment conversation until later.

1854
03:00:12.360 --> 03:00:13.197
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1855
03:00:14.405 --> 03:00:15.338
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Koyama Lane.

1856
03:00:17.287 --> 03:00:18.431
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>Thank you, Madam President.

1857
03:00:19.299 --> 03:00:22.429
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>This is helpful to hear more about your intention behind this.

1858
03:00:23.141 --> 03:00:27.162
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>At first, I was thinking about it as making sure that there was really balance throughout the city.

1859
03:00:27.338 --> 03:00:37.738
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And as you were talking about it, it sounded to me more also, or also, or more, not sure, you can explain, that this was about making sure that District 1 isn't left out and is part of the conversation.

1860
03:00:38.075 --> 03:00:39.806
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>And that is compelling to me.

1861
03:00:39.933 --> 03:00:47.032
<v Tiffany Koyama Lane>I'm wondering if you have considered the idea of putting in something specifically around District 1.

1862
03:00:48.331 --> 03:00:50.798
<v Jamie Dunphy>You know, I certainly feel special about District 1.

1863
03:00:52.273 --> 03:00:55.381
<v Jamie Dunphy>But I don't think that for the health of the body it makes a lot of sense.

1864
03:00:56.363 --> 03:01:02.674
<v Jamie Dunphy>And I think this was the closest that I could get to making sure that my constituents east of I-205 are represented.

1865
03:01:03.219 --> 03:01:05.004
<v Jamie Dunphy>And in some circumstances, east of 82nd.

1866
03:01:05.131 --> 03:01:07.156
<v Jamie Dunphy>I don't— don't forget about you, Lents and Sumner.

1867
03:01:07.799 --> 03:01:13.100
<v Jamie Dunphy>But I didn't want to necessarily call out District 1 as though it is something precious.

1868
03:01:15.777 --> 03:01:16.332
<v Jamie Dunphy>Even though it is.

1869
03:01:20.900 --> 03:01:22.521
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you for that suggestion, Councilor.

1870
03:01:22.649 --> 03:01:23.260
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor Kanal?

1871
03:01:24.013 --> 03:01:24.447
<v Sameer Kanal>Yeah, thanks.

1872
03:01:24.656 --> 03:01:32.533
<v Sameer Kanal>Um, Councilor Zimmerman and, uh, Council President, I think your, your arguments convinced me, so I, I, uh, do think I'll be a no on this.

1873
03:01:32.694 --> 03:01:47.884
<v Sameer Kanal>But I do want to point out that I think this is something we should just have be a part of the conversation when we do have that second document come up around what the, um, what the, uh, the members and, and leadership might look like, not as the only goal.

1874
03:01:47.948 --> 03:01:57.968
<v Sameer Kanal>And I think at that time it does make sense to give input to you, Madam President, on how we might individually think that those items should be weighed.

1875
03:01:59.459 --> 03:02:01.029
<v Sameer Kanal>Not items, criteria that you used.

1876
03:02:01.352 --> 03:02:01.983
<v Sameer Kanal>So thank you.

1877
03:02:03.277 --> 03:02:03.957
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Thank you, Councilor.

1878
03:02:04.263 --> 03:02:08.735
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>And I hear that I'm now put on notice to make sure that I can explain all of that.

1879
03:02:08.870 --> 03:02:09.445
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>That's great.

1880
03:02:13.024 --> 03:02:15.670
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, there is no one else in the queue.

1881
03:02:16.310 --> 03:02:24.486
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Councilor, would you like to take a chance on a vote on this, or would you like to make a motion to lay it on the table to come back to later in the debate?

1882
03:02:24.583 --> 03:02:27.852
<v Jamie Dunphy>I'd like to make a motion to lay it on the table for a later date.

1883
03:02:28.558 --> 03:02:33.478
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Given that that motion is coming from the carrier, is that something that we need to vote on to close debate on this amendment?

1884
03:02:34.328 --> 03:02:37.149
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, so we need to vote to close debate on this amendment.

1885
03:02:37.293 --> 03:02:45.263
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>You'll then have the second.

1886
03:02:45.412 --> 03:02:46.387
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>We can do it without objection?

1887
03:02:47.680 --> 03:02:47.872
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Fantastic.

1888
03:02:48.745 --> 03:02:51.942
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Colleagues, is there any objection to laying this matter on the table?

1889
03:02:52.298 --> 03:02:54.962
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>The carrier will be able to bring it back up at another point in the debate.

1890
03:02:55.979 --> 03:03:18.868
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>Okay, seeing none, I am going to carry over I will move to postpone our debate on this agenda item to tomorrow's recessed council meeting, which begins at 2:30, and we will continue debate on amendments and on the underlying motion.

1891
03:03:19.542 --> 03:03:22.393
<v Elana Pirtle-Guiney>This meeting is post— is recessed.

1892
03:03:28.968 --> 03:03:30.018
<v Loretta Smith>Thank you.

